Next Article in Journal
In-Situ Growth of Nucleus Geometry to Dual Types of Periodically Ringed Assemblies in Poly(nonamethylene terephthalate)
Next Article in Special Issue
Silica Microspheres for Economical Advanced Solar Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Liquid Crystalline Cholesteric Reflective Layers for Colored Silicon-Based Solar Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Direct Observation of Induced Graphene and SiC Strengthening in Al–Ni Alloy via the Hot Pressing Technique
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Development of Graphene/Silica Hybrid Composites: A Review for Their Applications and Challenges

1
Research Center for Metallurgy and Materials-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Building 470, PUSPIPTEK Area, Tangerang Selatan, Banten 15314, Indonesia
2
Department of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, East Java 60111, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2021, 11(11), 1337; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11111337
Submission received: 20 September 2021 / Revised: 25 October 2021 / Accepted: 26 October 2021 / Published: 1 November 2021

Abstract

:
Graphene and silica are two materials that have wide uses and applications because of their unique properties. Graphene/silica hybrid composite, which is a combination of the two, has the good properties of a combination of graphene and silica while reducing the detrimental properties of both, so that it has promising future prospects in various fields. It is very important to design a synthesis method for graphene/silica composite hybrid materials to adapt to its practical application. In this review, the synthesis strategies of graphene, silica, and hybrid graphene/silica composites such as hydrothermal, sol-gel, hydrolysis, and encapsulation methods along with their results are studied. The application of this composite is also discussed, which includes applications such as adsorbents, energy storage, biomedical fields, and catalysts. Furthermore, future research challenges and futures need to be developed so that hybrid graphene/silica composites can be obtained with promising new application prospects.

1. Introductions

In the period 1982–1983, the major concept re-direction of the sol-gel process to create heterogeneous material was explained by Roy, Komarneni, and colleagues. During the process, the term ‘nanocomposite’ was often used [1]. Nanocomposite, solid phase material, has at least one dimension in the nanometre range on amorphous, semicrystalline, or crystalline or combinations thereof. Composition of nanocomposites are design based on multifunctional properties that refer to the inorganic or organic, or both [1,2].
To a great extent in the last two decades, the progression of many aspects built by nanocomposite has been developed. Nanocomposite properties are influenced by the structures. Therefore, the need for understanding and practicing material behavior across length scales from the atomic to the macroscopic scale is important for scientists and engineers. Commonly, their reinforced material is divided into particles, layered materials, and fibrous materials [2].
Similarly, nanocomposites are also divided by their matrix. There are polymer matrix nanocomposites, ceramic matrix nanocomposites, and metal matrix nanocomposites [3]. Extraordinary properties were obtained by combining various materials as previously mentioned. such as its based composition, reinforcement, or matrix on the design material process by the scientist and engineer. Essentially, a variety of applications of nanocomposites is achieved by versatile properties that could be enhanced from their manufacturing [4]. Recently, nanocomposites have widely been applied in environmental remedies, energy, medicine, sunscreens, biomaterials, etc. Nanocomposites are becoming an attractive field of materials which provide novel performance due to their remarkable properties [5]. Currently, nanocomposites are widely used in industry to replace the use of conventional fillers because most of the nanoscale fillers are able to improve the mechanical and thermal properties of nanocomposites [6].
Graphene, a semimetal thin material, is a single layer carbon atom with 2 dimensional sheets in a densely packed honeycomb lattice structure [5]. Since its discovery, it has continuously been making an impact on future material development, increasing research into advance synthesis methods from year to year, in order to confront industrial challenges from many angles, such as automotive, green energy, electronics, biomedical, catalyst and others [7]. The graphene-copper (II) phthalocyanine (CuPc) hybrid material has been used as an electrocatalyst for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 [8]. Meanwhile, reduced Nickel/graphene oxide nanoparticles were applied as a catalyst to convert CO2 to CH4 by showing good activity in CO2 methanation processes [9].
Starting from the academic field to isolated graphite in 2004, existing theoretical possibility in preparing tiny sheets of graphene, within 10 years becoming a high prospect project in growing economical and innovative research for society, aiming dynamics field and multitude of actors on commercial [7]. Graphene discovery was a sign of the new era for researchers and the material physics community to collect the “gold” from the “hidden gold mine”. [10].
With numerous functions and a high chance of becoming a future material, graphene has been supported by its great properties. It has a large surface area (2630 m2), high electrical conductivity (106 S cm−1), high thermal conductivity (5000 W m−1 K−1), high mechanical strength (~40 Nm−1), great optical transmittance (~97.7%), high modulus of elasticity (1 TPa), and high electron intrinsic mobility (250000 cm2 V−1 s−1) [11,12,13]. Primarily, due to the potential value of graphene, analysis of this material is focused on its properties such as electrical, physical, mechanical, and optical [12]. For example, recognizing that properties needed for several characterization methods are likely optical microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), Raman scattering and Rayleigh scattering [14]. In the case of graphene attractive properties, various applications have been listed including high-end composite materials, field effect transistors, electromechanical systems, strain sensors, electronics, supercapacitors, hydrogen storage and solar cells [13].
Silica is an inexhaustible resource on earth [15] that can be found both from natural resources [16] and inorganic compounds [17]. Agricultural waste such as rice husks, rice hulls, bagasse ash, semi-burned rice straw ash [18], bentonite, quartz sand, and diatomaceous earth [15] are the natural resources containing high silica. Meanwhile, silica obtained from inorganic compounds, namely TEOS (Tetraethyl Orthosilicate) [18], SSS (Sodium Silicate Solution), and TMOS (Tetramethyl Orthosilicate) can be synthesized from silane [17]. In recent years, the synthesis of silica from natural materials has been growing with various advantages. The natural evolution of plants over the years has been able to develop silica layers and produce highly reactive silica by a simple process [15].
Silica has wide applications in various fields including drug delivery systems, catalysis, biomedical, imaging, chromatography, sensors and as a filler composite material [18]. Porous silica ceramics as candidates for high temperature dielectrics and thermal shields with their dielectric and thermal properties as well as low density used in aerospace and engineering [19]. Naturally, silica has a tendency to produce the strength and hardness of ceramic materials [15]. In addition, silica aerogel is a promising material used in composite insulators with its porous, ultra-lightweight, and nanostructured properties. It also can be used as a material for water resistance, UV protection, fire resistance, and has excellent acoustic barrier properties [20]. Silica gel with a high specific surface area and a gas adsorption capacity due to the presence of micro and mesopores is used as an adsorbent such as for removal of heavy metals from wastewater and the adsorption of volatile organic compounds [21]. In other fields of application, silica nanoparticles are used as superhydrophobic materials by changing their hydrophilic properties to hydrophobic ones [22].
Based on the several advantages possessed by graphene and silica, both can be integrated to produce better new properties. The synthesis of graphene silica hybrid composites will produce properties that integrate the two and can avoid performance degradation caused by agglomeration of graphene [23]. Stack agglomeration that occurs in the graphene preparation process will greatly reduce the specific surface area, thereby reducing the performance of graphene. The combination of graphene and silica can effectively reduce agglomeration and produce advanced functional materials [24]. This material has complementary advantages and considerable application prospects in many fields. Currently, graphene and silica (G/SiO2) hybrid composites are widely applied for electrodes, catalysts, hydrogen storage, batteries, displays, adsorbents, and sensors [23].
In this paper review, we report on the current focus on the development of graphene–silica hybrid composites and their applications in various fields. Furthermore, various synthesis methods for graphene, silica, and graphene–silica hybrid composites have been summarized according to sources. The functions and applications of graphene–silica hybrid composites in various fields are briefly discussed.

2. Synthesis Methods

2.1. Synthesis Method of Silica

Silica extraction from several sources with various methods aims to produce silica with a high purity and a high quality. Several researchers have conducted research to synthesize silica from its source with various methods and have focused on the environmental regulation of temperature and combustion time as well as chemical treatment so as to produce different structures and properties of silica amorphous to the crystalline phase [25].

2.1.1. Sol-Gel Method

Sol-gel is the most frequently used method in silica synthesis and is suitable for the manufacturing industry. The reaction in this method is controlled by one of the acidic or basic conditions. By using this method, a uniform silica particle in size, high purity, ease of control and scalability was achieved [22]. Abbas, et al. [20] conducted an experiment on extracting silica aerogel from rice husks using the sol-gel method for application in environmentally friendly, lightweight, and heat-resistant cement composites. It uses sodium hydroxide solution to form hydrogel, is immersed in ethanol to make an alcogel and surface modification to form a hydrophobic gel, and is then dried to produce silica aerogel. The result showed a dominant mesoporous structure and a high surface area of 760 m2/g. The addition of silica aerogel to the cement composite can reduce the density from 2102 kg/m3 to 1133 kg/m3 and lowers the thermal conductivity from 1.76 W/mK to 0.33 W/mK.
In the study by Ismail et al. [22], the extraction of silica nanoparticles from silica sand using is performed mechanically by grinding and the sol-gel method is used as a superhydrophobic material. To form a silica superhydrophobic, silica nanoparticles were mixed with stearic acid and ethanol. It was observed that the particle size increased with the increasing chain length of the alcohol. The particle size distribution was related to solvent polarity, which influenced the nucleation and growth of the silica particles. Methanol is the most polar alcohol solvent, which can increase the solubility of sodium silicate and therefore obtained a high concentration of very small silica nuclei. The superhydrophobic effect of silica nanoparticles can also be seen in their application, both as coatings and as mixed materials.
The sol-gel method was also used in the research of Sdiri et al. [21] to extract silica gel from siliceous sands. Silica sand was mixed with sodium carbonate to prepare sodium silicate, and hydrochloric acid was then added to obtain silica gel in micro and mesoporous pores with a high adsorption capacity. The silica content resulting from this method was 88.8–97.5%. The porosity of the silica gel reaches 57% and the specific surface area exceeds 340 m2/G. Silica gel obtained from this method was in micro and mesoporous pores with a high adsorption capacity, which has potential to be applied to adsorbents, such as heavy metal removal from wastewater and the adsorption of volatile organic compounds.

2.1.2. Hydrothermal

The hydrothermal method is one of the processes used to synthesize silica with a low cost and a simple technique in the preparation of nanomaterials [26]. The synthesis of amorphous silica nanowires from commercial silicate glass was carried out by Zhu Y et al. [26] using the one-step hydrothermal method. The hydrothermal process was carried out at a temperature of 170 °C. The results showed that the silica in nanoscale was achieved in the form of an amorphous SiO2 nanowire with a diameter of 20–100 nm and a length of several tens of micrometers.
In a study by Ortiz et al. [27], MCM-41 mesoporous silica was synthesized by a hydrothermal method using sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) as a source of silica, hexadecyltrimethyl-ammonium bromide (CTAB) as a template agent, and ethyl acetate as a pH regulator. The synthesis was carried out at 80, 90, and 100 °C, resulting in an increase in temperature affecting the formation of MCM-41 silica negatively. Mesoporous silica MCM-41 is synthesized from these reaction conditions depicted in a well-ordered hexagonal array with spherical morphology and particle sizes of 200 to 500 nm. MCM-41 mesoporous silica could have promising applications in catalysis, drug delivery systems and the adsorption of organic molecules owing to its high specific surface area.

2.1.3. Leaching

The two main steps in extracting silica, especially from natural resources, are combustion and chemical treatment. Dissolution of materials in acid can be used to remove organic compounds in materials before combustion [28]. A method of chemical treatment with hydrochloric acid or sulfuric acid was used to prepare ultrafine size silica, high reactivity and high purity. The purpose of acid pretreatment is to increase purity by removing impurities and gives the silica a high surface area during its deposition [25]. Eko, et al. [29] applied sulfuric acid for the leaching process of low-grade silica from quartz sand. The result depicted sulfuric acid as being very effective to remove impurities of aluminum and iron up to 42% and 85%, respectively. The process using sulfuric acid could produce high purity silica with 96.44% purity.
In environmentally friendly chemical extraction methods, there are acid alkaline treatment and washing steps aimed at controlling the size and pores in the silica particles [25,26]. Febriana, et al. [30] has succeeded in synthesizing silica by a direct leaching method at atmospheric pressure. Precipitated silica content of 13.6% was obtained under optimum conditions at a temperature of 90 °C and a stirring speed of 800 rpm, with a sodium hydroxide solution of 7.5 M, which produced amorphous precipitate silica with a purity of ±96%. Azat, et al. [25] conducted an experiment to extract silica from rice husk. The leaching process used a hydrochloric acid solution and was calcined at 600 °C. The amorphous silica with a purity of 98.2–99.7% and a certain surface area of 120–980 m2/G was produced from this method.
Another study by Park et al. [28] demonstrating the process of extracting silica from rice husks uses a two-stage continuous process consisting of a friction ball attrition and an alkaline washing method. With the use of NaOH, the silica yield becomes saturated, starting from 0.2 M and a yield of 79%. With the use of KOH, silica yields a saturation starting from 0.5 M with a yield of about 77%. The optimum reaction conditions were a concentration of 0.2 M at 80 °C for 3 h, and a solid content of 6% (w/v). This extraction method produces amorphous silica with 98.5% purity. Synthesis of amorphous and crystalline silica from rice husk was also carried out by Zainal et al. [15] using chemical treatment with hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 60 °C. The combustion was carried out at a temperature of 700 °C and 1000 °C for 2 h. From the experiment, it was found that amorphous silica is formed at 700 °C and crystalline silica is formed at 1000 °C. Chemical treatment before combustion increased the silica content from 95.7% to 98.7%.

2.1.4. Pyrolysis

Pyrolysis is one of the methods used to synthesize silica. Catalyst-assisted pyrolysis of polymeric precursors for nanostructures is a simple and easy controlling method. Moreover, its products are of a high purity. It can be applied in fabricating Si-based nanostructures by adjusting the composition of polymeric precursors, catalysts, and atmospheres [31]. In the study of Cho et al. [32], silica particles were synthesized by the flame spray pyrolysis (FSP) method from two precursors of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) and silicate acid. When the concentration of TEOS is increased from 0.1 to 0.5 M, the specific surface area of silica powder is decreased from 285 to 81.4 m2/g and the average particle size is increased from 9.6 to 33.5 nm.
Research conducted by Gao, et al. [31] nano-/submicron silica spheres were successfully synthesized by the pyrolysis method from amorphous polysilazane preceramic powder with FeCl2 catalyst. The perhydropolysilazane precursor was solidified by heating at 260 °C for 0.5 h in N2. The mixture of amorphous SiCN with FeCl2 was heated to 1250 °C and pyrolyzed there for 2 h. This experiment resulted in an amorphous silica with a diameter of 600–800 nm and a smooth clean surface without any flaws.
A comparison of the result characteristic from several different synthesis methods can be seen in Table 1.

2.2. Synthesis Method of Graphene

About two past decades, since its first mechanically exfoliation, graphene has been widely synthesized with many various methods and materials. Graphene synthesis can be divided into two different methods, there are: ‘Bottom-up’ and ‘Top-down’ [11,33]. The bottom-up method is by using another substrate as a field for planting the graphene by putting the carbon precursor vapor into them, or in other words, using a different source that contains carbon rather than graphite. Meanwhile, for top-down methods using mechanical or chemical steps to obtain one single layer graphene from the structure of the graphite and derivatives (graphite oxide and graphite fluoride), or crushing apart multiple layer graphite into a single graphene sheet [11,34]. The detailed explanation of synthesis graphene is described in the following sections.

2.2.1. Top-Down Approaches

The Top-Down method processing raw material into final product that can be used to widely apply in industry. Starting from its first exfoliation in 2004, a thousand trials have been elevated to produce graphene from graphite. This method has several benefits compared with bottom-up methods, such as its potential to scale up, optimization of cost revenue, no need for substrate transfer, and its high productivity [35]. Therefore, the top-down method is mainly used on large-scale implementations. Some methods are discussed in the following segments.

Exfoliation Method

Basically, this method is the easiest and most widely used to synthesize graphite into graphene. An exfoliation method is divided into several types: mechanical exfoliation (scotch tape), chemical/electrochemical exfoliation, thermal exfoliation, and electrical exfoliation [35,36]. Mechanical exfoliation, also known as scotch tape, was developed by Geim and Novoselov in 2004 by using highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) as a precursor and subjected it into oxygen plasma etching. As a result, 5 μm deep mesas existed and then it pressed into a layer of photoresist to the baking process. To peel out flakes of graphite from the mesas, scotch tape was used. After that, the thin flakes obtained are deposited to acetone and framed on the surface of Si/SiO2 wafer. SEM and optical microscopy were used to analyze the few-layer graphene (FLG) formed. From this, Geim and Novoselov gained few- and single-layer graphene flakes up to 10 μm in size [5,37].
GICs, graphite intercalation compounds, were structured by graphite with atoms or molecules in compounds which were intercalated between the carbon layers. Mechanical and thermal exfoliation was served by this intercalation because of its characteristics. The increase in space between the layers weakened the interlayer interactions. The arrangement of the layer involved stacking from first stage GICs to the higher stage to complete formed monolayer platelets. Then, the expanded graphite (EG) could be produced from the higher stage GIC by exfoliating in rapid heating [36]. Graphene oxide (GO) could be formed from graphite oxide by using mechanical exfoliation (i.e., ultrasonication and stirring), since graphite oxide has natural hydrophilic and larger space interlayers along concentration 3 mg/mL [36].
Eswaraiah et al. (2011) implemented this method using focused solar radiation [38]. From a convex lens of 90 mm diameter, solar radiation is intensified and is directed to graphite oxide. It will increase the temperature of solar radiation by 150–200 °C from ambient temperature and a change in power from 60 mW to 2 W. The color of graphite oxide is also changed from light brown to dark black due to the high intensity of radiation. Exfoliation happens at a low temperature (150–200 °C) because of the rapid heating rate (>100 °C s−1), then decomposition of the functional group occurs with the evolution of CO2. The synthesis result depicts most of the GO as being efficiently exfoliated to form separated, ultrathin, and transparent sheets. Moreover, TEM images show the wrinkled nature of the graphene sheets. The thickness of graphene sheets calculated by HRTEM lattice imaging came out to be ~1 nm. The average step heights measured between the surface of the sheets and the substrate were found to be ~0.9 to 1.4 nm, proving them to be two atoms thick.

Chemical Reduction of Graphene Oxide/Organic Treatment

Chemical reduction triggered the exfoliated graphene oxide sheets to produce a balanced colloidal dispersion of graphene oxide (GO) [39]. Graphite oxide has hydrophilic characteristics in several solvents, including water, alcohol, etc. The same as graphite oxide, graphene oxide is suspended by sonication in solvents and acts as a precursor for graphene synthesis [37,40]. Purposing graphene formed by oxidizing graphite into graphene is one step ahead of producing a bulk graphene process [41]. Single- or multi-layer GO is created by the modification of Hummer’s original method, and is adjusted in a thermal or chemical process [11,37].
Handayani et al. used sulphuric acid, sodium nitrite, and hydrogen peroxide potassium permanganate as chemical reagents in this method [42]. An exfoliation and intercalation process are performed by oxidizing graphite powder into graphene oxide and reducing it into graphene in polar aprotic solvents. Brownish graphene oxide from chemical treatment is the product and then sodium borohydride is added as a reducing agent to dispersing graphene oxide, turning the color black and homogenizing it. Abbas, et al. synthesized graphene oxide from Spent coffee beans via modified Hummer’s method and reduced graphene oxide to form graphene using hydrazine as a reducing agent [43]. The electrochemical performance of the rGO-based modified electrode showed that the energy, voltage, and coulombic efficiency of the rGO-based electrode were more than 90% with a stability of up to 65 cycles. The efficiency is comparable to that of pure graphite electrodes used commercially. This is so that the material from biomass-derived rGO has great potential as a substitute for commercial graphite as an electrode material for VRB applications. He et al. in 2011 investigated the properties of graphene paper using chemical reduction [44]. Graphene was prepared in a paper form after synthesis using exfoliation, sonication, homogenization, and the addition of a hydrazine process. Furthermore, it annealed at 80 °C in a vacuum for 24 h before being cooled to room temperature. Characterization methods such as Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy (UV-Vis) absorption spectra, Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectra, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA), Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) and others were implemented to analyze the properties of chemically reduced graphene (CRG). As a result of this research there is the fabrication of stable CRG aqueous dispersions and papers with different reduction levels. Properties of CRG are associated with levels of chemical reduction that can be adjusted and monitored to obtain the desired thermal stability, electrical property or tensile strength, and advanced controlled properties. Chemical reduction of graphene oxide using sodium acetate trihydrate presents its advantages in low-cost, use of non-toxic agent, no hazardous waste and simple product separation processes [45]. Sodium acetate trihydrate is an effective reducing agent in removing most of the oxygen-containing groups from GO for restoring the conjugated electronic structure of graphene.

Electrochemical Method

Electrochemical reactions mainly consist of cathode, anode, electrolyte, and metallic contact (standard electrochemical cell). The synthesis method of electrochemical reduction has the purpose of returning the actual properties of pristine graphene and of utilizing the reduced graphene (rGO) capability. This method has a resulting product, namely electrochemically reduced graphene oxide (ErGO), which contains graphene structure and properties that are different from pristine graphene. The reduction process is controlled by its potential value, and group of oxygen removal in graphene oxide (GO) by working of the electrode surface. Part of the electrochemical system affected the properties of the ErGO [46].
The pencil core is used as an electrode, a cathode and an anode in research by Liu et al. [47] Electrochemical exfoliation is configured in 1 M aqueous electrolytes (H2SO4 or H3PO4) and is potentially ramped for between +7 V and −7 V for 5–8 min. The result of this study is that the exfoliated graphene oxide flakes are quite large and have great electrocatalytic activity and toxicity tolerance for an oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline solution. Different electrode materials were conducted by Parvez et al. in 2013 [48] using Platinum (Pt) as a cathode and graphite as an anode. Electrochemical exfoliation is configured in 0.1 M H2SO4 solutions and is potentially ramped at +10 V for 10 min. The result of this study is that the exfoliated graphene has yielded about 60% and with multiple layers. Moreover, the product has a large sheet size, low oxygen content, and/or high C/O ratio as well as excellent electronic properties. Referring to the two studies above, the perfect electrolyte for an electromechanical system is a high-grade acid such as H2SO4. Flaking process on graphite is supported by acid electrolyte.

Ball Milling

Recently, the current development on the graphene synthesis method has a higher potential, which is improved from another step-like ball milling process. The product actually has a chance to enhance and also be an efficient stage for the synthesis method. Although this method is still being developed, high quality graphene from grinding bulk is hopefully produced on a large scale. Graphene, a ball-milling product, is influenced by the wet and dry conditions. Two forces play an important role in this process, such as shear forces exfoliating large graphene sheets, while normal forces break down graphite flakes [35].
Wu et al. show the accomplished mechanochemical reactions from the suspension of graphite and polystyrene (PS) solution by a ball-milling process [49]. High electrical conductive PS/graphene nanocomposites are obtained with homogenous mono- or few-layer graphene sheets. The process is operated by dispersed graphite nanoplatelets in N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) solvent to sonicate and generate it into a ball mill with 300 rpm. Mondall et al. used a modified Hummers method and a ball mill with zirconium ball (5 mm diameter) with 800 rpm angular speed to prove the amorphisms of reduced graphene oxides and the removal of oxygen function groups [50].
Lin et al. in 2017 found a new method on graphene synthesis, especially few-layer graphene (FLG) using plasma-assisted ball milling (P-milling) with various media [51]. The ball-milling media used in this experiment are boron nitride (BN), tungsten carbide (WC), zinc oxide (ZnO), iron oxide (Fe2O3), and germanium oxide (GeO2). Preparation is done by calcining the expandable graphite at 1000 °C for 15 min with a heating rate at 5 °C/min under Ar atmosphere. Then, the sample is mixed with tungsten carbide (WC) with a ratio of 1:4 to place it in the ball-milling process. The P-milling process is set up with vibration on a 7 mm amplitude, 16 Hz frequency, 15 kV voltage, 1.5 A current, and 60 kHz discharge frequency. Treatment time is configured at 2 h, 5 h, 8 h and 10 h. The result of this process is the 6-layered FLG nanosheets with a high quality after the 8 h process with WC medium. The layers were formed due to the influence of inductive capacity of the ball-milling media, where it will affect the quality of FLG. The higher the inductive capacity, the lower the layer formed, and the higher the FLG quality. However, the ideal range for the inductive capacity is around 7–8.

2.2.2. Bottom-Up Approaches

A bottom-up graphene synthesis method that adjusts to the capability of the material from the building part is by part of the structure. The electron character is influenced by the configurations of atoms that are based on carbon precursors. The benefit of this method is that the size of its setting can be adjusted, so the dimension of the product is predictable. However, this method has several limitations compared to the top-down method, including the low properties obtained (i.e., yield), high cost, and the difficulties in scaling up. The following sections explain the examples of the bottom-up method [35].

Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD)

Since 2009, the CVD method has become popular among researchers and has been often used until now. The carrier of this system is an inert gas with a high temperature and vacuum environment to process highly volatile carbon sources. There are many sources of carbon, such as precursors in gases (methane, acetylene, ethylene), liquids (ethanol, methanol), and solids (bio-carbon, polymer, waste plastic). The opportunity of this method lies in the high electrical conductivity that can be widely applied for electronic devices [11].
Li et al. in 2012 implemented a CVD method by keeping electropolished Cu foils under low pressure and toluene at 500–600 °C to grow continuous single layer graphene films [52]. As a result, the graphene has been produced with a high sheet resistance, a good transmittance of around 97.33% at 550 nm and a good electron mobility of 190 cm2/(V.s). Li et al. also reported this, but from a different precursor, methane [53]. Copper foil was analyzed at a high temperature (1035 °C) under low pressure. The product obtained had a single crystallographic orientation, with a high electron mobility of 4000 cm2/(V.s).
Principally, the precursor carbon source and the rate of growth graphene determined the form of the graphene product. Big or small, the graphene size could be adjusted by controlling those two factors. Moreover, the large-area, high quality graphene and the large size of the graphene single crystals with different shapes and layers could be fabricated in case of the managed synthesis parameter due to Liu et al. in 2017 [54].

Arc Discharge

Arc discharge is a low cost and environmentally friendly synthesized graphene method. The obtained graphene with this method could be done under several circumstances, such as in a hydrogen, helium, or nitrogen state. Few-layered graphene (FLG) is produced under a helium and carbon dioxide mixture as it was in an experiment by Wu et al. in 2010 [55]. Synthesis method is controlled by directing current around 100–200 A, discharging voltage 30 V, and setting up diameter of anode 13 mm and cathode 40 mm. The result exhibits FLG sheets in organic solvents that can be easily dispersed and have fewer defects than other chemical steps. The capability of the solution used is important for fabricating electrical devices and composite materials.
In 2016, Kim et al. showed the arc discharge process to produce bi- and trilayer graphene using water medium as the dielectric [56]. A DC power supply is used to flow the direct current with amounts 1 A to 4 A between cathode and anode, keeping the voltage at about 25 V to initiate the arc discharge process. To remove the residual solvent, a drying process is needed with heating at around 85 °C for 2 h. The resulting product has the probability to become a good electrode because it has a high transmittance (84.5% at 550 cm−1) and an electrical resistivity of 27.7 kΩ cm−2.

CNT Unzipping

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes were cut longitudinally by first suspending them in sulphuric acid and then treating them with KMnO4. This produced oxidized graphene nanoribbons, which were subsequently reduced chemically. The resulting graphene nanoribbons were found to be conducting, but were electronically inferior to large-scale graphene sheets due to the presence of oxygen defect sites [37].
Kosynkin et al. in 2009 [57] explained how to get graphene nanoribbons by unzipping CNT. The product obtained was approximately near a 100% yield of the nanoribbon structure. Mechanism opening is dependent on oxidation alkenes by permanganate acid. Graphene structures were found subsequently in acid conditions (H2SO4) in exfoliating nanotubes.

2.3. Synthesis Method of Silica–Graphene Hybrid Composites

A SiO2/graphene composite is a material that has a high specific surface area, good mechanical properties, and good electrical conductivity. Appropriate fabrication methods must be chosen to produce composites with improved physical and chemical properties in order to obtain a high performance [24].

2.3.1. Hydrothermal

The hydrothermal method is one of the simplest methods of graphene/silica (G/SiO2) composite synthesis [23]. Graphene/mesoporous silica composites have been successfully synthesized by Qian et al. with one-step hydrothermal method from Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS) and organic solvents as a carbon source. Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was dissolved with urea and was then added to an organic solvent, iso-propanol, and TEOS. It was reacted for 4 h at 180 °C. The formation mechanism of G/SiO2 is shown in Figure 1. The result of this experiment shows that graphene and silica layer are simultaneously produced and the distribution of graphene is uniform in the composite. In addition, organic solvents such as hexane, heptane, toluene, benzene, and cyclohexane can be used as a carbon source, therefore graphene does not need to use graphite as a carbon source.
TEM image of G/SiO2 composites prepared with different organic solvents as a carbon source are shown in Figure 2. It is shown that all mesoporous spherical particles with a radial channel structure in the diameter of 0.2–1 μm and uniform distribution of graphene in composite were produced from this experiment. The pore size of the prepared SiO2@G/SiO2 particles reaches 17.7 nm.
The synthesis of SiO2 nanocomposite/reduced graphene oxide (RGO) has also been successfully synthesized by Yi et al. [58] with a one-step hydrothermal method under acidic conditions using tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) and graphene oxide (GO). Mixtures of GO and SiO2 will undergo a hydrothermal reaction in a cylindrical stainless steel reactor at 120 °C for 12 h. Along with the TEOS hydrolysis process, silica is loaded on a GO sheet surface with covalent bonds. Experimental results show that SiO2 nanoparticles can be dispersed uniformly on the surface of the RGO. The composite containing 75 wt.% SiO2 has a micro-mesopore structure with a surface area of 676 m2/g. The synthesized SiO2/RGO samples had an adsorption performance with the efficiency of Cr(VI) ion removal in wastewater reached equilibrium in 30 min and the adsorption efficiency of Cr(VI) reached 98.8% at pH = 2 and temperature 35 °C.

2.3.2. Sol-Gel

Sol-gel is one of the methods used to synthesize graphene/silica composites with the advantage of easy control of chemical composition and the ability to form composites with various filling materials [59]. The synthesis of silica/graphene oxide hydrogel has been successfully carried out by Oh Byeolnim et al. using the sol-gel method based on silica hydrogel with a combination of an acid/base catalyst system. From this experiment, it was found that GO was dispersed and did not suffer structural damage. The higher the GO volume, the faster the gelatinization process so as to minimize the occurrence of GO particle agglomeration. The presence of a catalyst (NaOH) makes the composition in the composite evenly distributed due to the acceleration of the gelatinization process. On the other hand, the hydrogel weakens with increasing GO, but the flexibility increases. It has a modulus of elasticity of 10 kPa–4.5 MPa, the highest compressive strength, compressive strain, and young modulus is about 0.3 Mpa, 0.35, 4.7 Mpa.
Haeri et al. in 2017 exhibited two route sol-gel methods for synthesized silica-functionalized graphene oxide nanosheets (GONs) [60]. The first route of the sol-gel method is running. 5 wt.% silane mixture (TEOS-60 wt.% and APTES-40 wt.%), 80 wt.% alcohol and 15 wt.% deionized water, then added GO nanosheets with the control pH of 4. For the second route, GO nanosheets are put into a mixture after oligomers formed from interaction between the hydrolyzed TEOS and APTES silane precursors at specific circumstances with pH 4 for 72 h, followed by the sonication process. The resulting surface GONs has coarse and unequal characteristics, and also SiO2 nanoparticles appear a lot for the second method compared with the first method. This is because in second method, silane deposition is converted into SiO2 nanoparticles, whereas in method 1, it was grafted in a GO sheet.

2.3.3. Hydrolysis

Wang et al. [61] have successfully synthesized silica/graphene oxide sheets for epoxy composites using one step process with assistance of diethylenetriamine (DETA) or ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) as catalyst. GO was prepared from graphite with a modified Hummer’s method and SiO2 was prepared from TEOS with hydrolysis and condensation. The SiO2 could be easily formed onto the GO surface by the hydrolysis of TEOS which improved the dispersibility of GO and enhanced interaction with epoxy matrix. It was revealed that the GO-SiO2/epoxy composites exhibited higher tensile, flexural and impact strength and modulus than that of GO.
Another work of Silica-Graphene Oxide Hybrid Composite Particles synthesizedwith hydrolysis method was performed by Zhang et al. [62]. Preparation of Si-GO Hybrid Composites were conducted by dispersion GO and TEOS in ethanol and hydrated ammonia was added to the mixture as a catalyst. Successful decoration of silica nanoparticles on layered GO surface by hydrolysis of TEOS in Si-GO composite were ensured by SEM and TEM images depicted in Figure 3c,f, respectively. The results show the success of the synthesis of silica particles on the GO surface. Si-GO hybrid composite particles showed a better thermal stability than GO. The Si-GO hybrid composite-based ER (electrorheology) fluid exhibits typical ER characteristics and behaves as a Bingham fluid in the presence of an electric field. ER fluids present a very short relaxation time in dielectric analysis.

2.3.4. Encapsulation

Encapsulation is one of the graphene/silica composite synthesis methods that can produce advantages in increasing silica−epoxy interface adhesion. The GO (graphene) encapsulation core shell hybrid made with an ultra-thin layer GO (graphene) on organic/inorganic objects can provide special properties and applications [63].
The experiment about epoxy/silica composites by introducing graphene oxide to the interface was done by Chen et al. [63] with the core shell method. GO was prepared from natural graphite by the Hummers method and surface modification of SiO2 with an APS coupling agent. The SiO2−GO hybrid was fabricated by mixing the suspension of SiO2−NH2 and the GO solution. Preparation of epoxy/SiO2−GO composites by dispersion of SiO2−GO in tetrahydrofuran solvent. The SiO2 and SiO2−GO composite morphology investigated by SEM and HR-TEM reveal that SiO2 particles exhibits smooth surface (Figure 4a), whereas SiO2−GO shows that the silica surfaces are intimately covered by ultrathin GO with the shell thicknesses less than 3 nm as depicted in Figure 4 b-d The presence of flexible and very thin GO sheets can be attributed to the creases and rough texture of the composite. Mechanical properties such as Young’s modulus, tensile strength, fracture toughness, and elongation are 1.36 GPa, 51 MPa, 1.81 MPa m1/2, and 7.36% respectively. It also has a Tg of 181.5–209.1 °C. The relatively reduced Tg values are due to the reduced network density, particle confinement of the filler−matrix interface, and the reduction in organic network density, which dominate the relaxation behavior of epoxy segments.
The SiO2@poly(methylmethacrylate)–reduced graphene oxide (SiO2@PMMA–rGO) composite was successfully synthesized by Ye et al. [64] with the encapsulation method. The synthesis was carried out by dispersion method polymerization and mixing of colloids based on electrostatic assembly. Monodispersed SiO2 nanoparticles with an average diameter of 300 nm were synthesized by hydrolysis and condensation of TEOS. An aqueous graphene oxide suspension was added to a positively charged SiO2@PMMA nanoparticle dispersion with stirring. The resulting product exhibits a high thermal stability with a decomposition temperature increased by 80 °C. Besides that, it also showed strong mechanical properties with a 108% increase in modulus up to a 125% increase in hardness. This composite has advantages in thermal stability, a strong mechanical performance, and an excellent conductivity. This method can efficiently avoid the agglomeration of the fused nanofillers as well as improving the interfacial adhesion between the PMMA filler and matrix, so that the resulting composite has a high performance. The strength and weaknesses of several processing methods for graphene/silica composites are compared, as seen in Table 2.

3. Applications of Silica-Graphene-Based Hybrid Composites

3.1. Adsorbent

Graphene and its derivatives have the advantage of having a high specific surface area and degrade persistent organic matter chemicals in water, which gives it great potential as an adsorption material for environmental pollutants. Meanwhile, SiO2 has the advantages of being a cheap, non-toxic, and chemically stable material that can overcome the problem of GO aggregation and can increase the specific surface area and adsorption properties. GO has many functional groups containing oxygen, which can absorb heavy metals from wastewater by electrostatic attraction, ion exchange, or surface complexation. Mesoporous silica has good potential in water treatment because of its stable mesoporous structure. Graphene/silica composites as adsorbents for water treatment have advantages over the use of graphene and silica individually because they have a higher adsorption capacity and stability [24].
In the research of Liu et al. [65], synthesis of graphene-silica (GS) composites by anchored nano-zero-valent iron (NZVI) to the surface were used to remove As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solution that the maximum capacity reached 45.57 mg/g and 45.12 mg/g respectively, by electrostatic attraction and complexation. Mesoporous silica ordered graphene oxide with a two-dimensional mesoporous structure and a large surface area has been synthesized by Wang, et al. (2015) [66] through the sol-gel method. This material is applied as a heavy metal adsorbent in water by adsorption separation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, that have removal efficiency, for metals As, Cd, Cr, Hg, and Pb reaching 97.7, 96.9, 96.0, 98.5, and 78.7%, respectively.
A graphene/silica composite material can be used as an adsorbent for organic pollutants due to their high specific surface area, active site, and good stability [24]. Phenyl-modified magnetic graphene/mesoporous silica (MG-MS-Ph) with a hierarchical pore-bridge structure was synthesized by Wang, et al. (2016) [67], which was applied as a pesticide adsorbent from wastewater. The resulted composite has a surface area of 446.5 m2/g with very regular mesopores, a uniform pore size of 2.8 nm, a pore volume 0.32 cm3/g, and a high saturation magnetization of 25 emu/g. The synthesis of the porous magnetic silica-graphene oxide hybrid composite (Fe3O4@mSiO2/GO) was successfully carried out by Liu, et al. (2014) [68] through the core-shell method to be applied as a p-nitrophenol adsorbent from an aqueous solution. The maximum adsorption capacity produced reached 1548.78 mg/g at a solution pH of 8 and a temperature of 25 °C.
The adsorbent commonly used for CO2 is an activated porous solid adsorbent such as carbon, zeolites, and metal-organic frameworks. Graphene coupled with silica also has a good performance as a CO2 adsorbent by increasing its pores [24]. Wang, et al. (2019) [69] used a 2D/3D structure of reduced graphene-silica oxide (G-Si) aerogel combination using mesoporous silica SBA-15. These special 2D/3D morphological features result in the high CO2 absorption capacity of 6.02 mmol/g as seen in Figure 5a. In addition, equilibrium is achieved very quickly within the first 12 min for 30-50 wt% of TEPA loading indicating that CO2 gas molecules diffused freely throughout G-Si aerogel and SBA-15 as shown in Figure 5b. Another CO2 adsorbent that has also been successfully synthesized is the reduced amine/graphene oxide (AMS/RGO) modified silica hybrid composite by Vinodh, et al. with a limited growth methodology, which the RGO introduced into the amino alkyl siloxane matrix. This composite shows a good absorption capacity (15% by weight) and a Maximum CO2 adsorption up to 14.7%.

3.2. Energy Storage

Many sources have stated that graphene has high expectations on building energy storage equipment. Great properties in the electrical field required an important role in constructing it. A combination between graphene structures and other materials such as silica provides the strengthened characteristics of composite [11]. Graphene can be formed into the three-dimensional graphene aerogel type, consisting of interconnected graphene sheets and loaded materials. Furthermore, important properties, such as mechanical and electrical ones, are preserved approaching the structures [70].
In the last decade, power saving technology to store energy has been developed in several ways, such as through batteries, capacitors, and others. Electrochemical capacitors (Ecs), commonly called supercapacitors, are devices with a high power capacity and a long cycle life (>100,000 cycles) which required minimal maintenance, and fast charging [71]. Research in this field has attractive value, due to its potential resource as an energy storage component. Ghosh et al. (2018) [72], by using the sol-gel method, synthesized a layer-by-layer composite that contained reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and iron silicate in glass. From that study it was found that the specific capacitance for the composite is 370 F/g, ranked in high grade for supercapacitor applications. This is because of a multilayer structure from rGO and iron silicate glass supporting the properties, such as a large surface area, swinging bonds, high electrical conductivity, and a racking porosity. A multilayer concept, such as an electrode capacitor, is also applied and was analyzed by Kim et al. (2015) [73] A vacuum channel was performed to understand the electrical and photodetection properties of the resulting product. A high responsivity for the structure of about 1.0 A/W at 633 nm was discovered and there is the hope for a capacitance of around 10 nF/cm2 for 1 μm depletion.
In the research of Abbas, et al., reduced graphene oxide (rGO) from waste coffee bean biomass is used as an alternative electrode material for the VRB (Vanadium redox flow battery) system. The resulting rGO exhibited more than 90% energy, voltage and coulombic efficiency, which was comparable to that of commercially used pure graphite electrodes. This electrode also has a stable cyclic performance for 65 cycles due to its high electrocatalytic activity and its enhanced charge transfer [43].
Another type of graphene form—aerogel—shapes the three-dimensional graphene that maintains interesting properties such as a large specific area, flexibility, and conduction. Furthermore, it could be implemented in catalysis, sensing, energy storage and others [70]. Du et al. in 2018 [74] investigated the effect of the addition of amino-functionalized silica as a template and doping agent for N-doped graphene aerogel. The forming structure is an N-doped rGO aerogel with a filling of SiO2-NH2 particles between the spaces and it has a macroscope diameter of around 50 μm. The number of SiO2-NH2 particles has an opposite value with a pore size of rGO aerogel; when it is higher the pore size it will be smaller, but the number of pores will increase. Electrochemical properties from the structure can be identified as the high specific capacitances of 350 F/g at the current density of 1 A/g with a great reversibility of 88%, a cycling efficiency after 10,000 cycle, and is supported by other properties like a specific large surface area pf 481.8 m2/g, a low series resistance and a high nitrogen doping content of about 4.4 atom% so that the composites are reliable as the components of a capacitor with a high oil-absorbability and recyclability.
Along with the rapid development of technology, the need for energy is also getting higher. An energy-saving concept with promising future prospects is lithium-ion batteries. The allocation of excellent properties other than energy storage, such as a high energy and power density, good durability, and environmental buddies, are impressively used in electric vehicle applications. However, this requires special attention for operating it under the limitation of voltage and temperature [75]. Graphene and silica combined were able to act as the electrode of lithium batteries, both anode and cathode. In 2013, Li et al. [76] mapped out the anode from a combination of graphene oxide and SiO2 nanoparticles by an annealing process. Three-dimensional graphene networks were formed owing to great properties such as reversible capacity (610.9 mAh/g at 50 mA/g after 50 cycles) and superb rate capability (291.5 mAh/g at 5000 mA/g). Considered as the electrode because of high power density, there was a large porosity and a high electrical conductivity based on the attribute of network structure. In addition, the anode can be designed by a self-assembly process as done by Yin et al. (2017) [77], Wang et al. (2018) [78] and Kim et al. (2018) [79].
Self-assembly procedures to construct the anode lithium-ion battery were done by Yin et al. [77] using ultrasonic-assisted hydrothermal and heat treatments. The unification process considered the mass ratio of all the materials used (colloidal silica, sucrose, and graphene oxide), playing an important role in this manner. Setting up the ratio of silica to sucrose of 0.15 exhibited a great electrical performance, such as discharge capacity (906 mA h/g) and reversible capacity (542 mAh/g at 100 mA/g after 216 cycle). A uniformly dispersed order of small SiO2 nanoparticles in the composites display the high properties (good conductivity) with a simple method implied [77]. An applied convenient method by a facile electrostatic self-assembly approach for obtaining nano-Si/reduced graphene oxide porous composite as anode of Li-ion battery application, Wang et al. [78] forfeiting SiO2 as a sacrificial template. The composites consist of nano-SiO2 particles evenly spread across rGO sheets that can intensify electronic conductivity. According to the result as depicted in Figure 6, electrochemical performances increase with the great reversible capacity (1849 mAh/g at 0.2 A/g) along with a decent capacity retention, and a high rate capability (535 mAh/g at 2 A/g) [78]. Kim et al. [79] reported that the novel structure consists of graphene nanocomposite with ordered mesoporous carbon-silica-titania using one-pot evaporation-induced. Mobility of ions is supported by the regular form of mesopores, which can assist in the transport of electrons in the graphene sheets and the penetration process in electrolytes. Furthermore, the structure clarifies the reason why it can be appropriate for electrodes. Within a high reversible capacity (547 mAh/g) and an efficient reversibility (65%), there is an increasing cycle work besides the large structural area [79].
On the other hand, this was also done for cathode of lithium-sulfur batteries by Kim et al. in 2014 [80] by using mesoporous-graphene silica that was infiltrated with sulfur on the organic liquid (polysulfide) electrolyte, resulting in the composite structure with a good electrochemical performance. Respectively, the electrical properties reported for cycling stability and reversible capacity were about 500 mAh/g and 380 mAh/g after 400 cycles. To be more convincing, further research was needed to discover the properties of this structure [80].
For solar energy conversion, alternative power saving, the best strategy for hydrogen production is photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting based on semiconductor electrodes. In 2018, Zhao et al. [81] analyzed the function and synergy effect of silane molecules and GO in WO3 nanosheets array (WO3 NS), where the WO3 NS was already grafted by silane molecules to make an external electric field (EEF). The result product possessed a high photocurrent of 1.25 mA/cm2 at 1.23 V vs RHE, rising 1.8 times as before. The important role of silane for this structure was a hole-storage spot together with GO being a hole-transfer pathway, carrier for channel, and increasing reactive site to promote water oxidation kinetics.

3.3. Biomedical Fields

GO has good biocompatibility, low toxicity, water solubility, and easy surface modification, which makes it attractive in the biomedical field. Meanwhile, silica nanoparticles have excellent biocompatibility, encapsulation ability in hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules, high surface area, tunable morphology, and scalable synthetics availability. This makes the combination of graphene and silica in composites have a high potential for application in medical fields such as drug carriers, imaging, diagnosis, and therapy [24].
Research conducted by He, et al. [82] with the assembly of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) and mesoporous silica grafted with an alkyl chain (MSN-C18) for application as a drug carrier on exposure to near-infrared light (NIR). This material has a structure formed by the noncovalent interaction of the RGO cap and the alkyl chain at the MSN-C18 surface. There is an unlocking mechanism on this material that allows the loaded drug molecules to be released by irradiating NIR light. These drug carrier agents can be a promising drug delivery system for cancer therapy.
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNPs) coated in blue fluorescent N-graphene quantum dots, loaded with DOX drug, and finally coated with hyaluronic acid (HA), was synthesized by Gui, et al. [83] for intracellular delivery of the cancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) to specific targeting of tumor cells. Imaging of human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells may arise as a result of cellular uptake of NPs with HA-DOX-GQD@MSNPs type architecture via fluorescence microscopy. Song, et al. [84] have designed a multifunctional probe incorporating active-targeted fluorescent imaging (FL)/photoacoustic imaging (PA) and chemo-photothermal therapy for tumors. Modified graphene oxide (GO) folate (FA) molecules were used to coat core-shell silver sulfide@mesopore silica (QD@Si) for loading the antitumoral doxorubicin (DOX) on mesoporous channels by the presence of electrostatic adhesion, and a delivery system (QD@Si-D/GO-FA) for active targeted dual-mode imaging and synergistic chemo-photothermal for tumors. The obtained cell survival rate was 76.3 ± 4.6%, which indicates that the probe has good biocompatibility. Tumors can be effectively killed at an increase in temperature to 63.5 °C under laser irradiation with combination chemotherapy due to the presence of GO exfoliation from QD@Si-D/GO-FA after irradiation.
In the study of Shao, et al. [85], mesoporous silica-coated polydopamine (MS)-fused reduced graphene oxide (pRGO) with modified hyaluronic acid (HA) (pRGO@MS-HA) has been used for cancer chemo-photothermal therapy as seen in Figure 7. This material is used to enhance doxorubicin (DOX) loading, with good dispersibility, excellent photothermal and tumor cell killing efficiency, and a specificity for targeting tumor cells, which is better than any monotherapy.

3.4. Catalysis

By using a two-step reduction method, purposely to make sandwich nanostructure electrocatalyst that contain silica nanosphere filled palladium encapsulated with graphene (denoted Pd/SiO2@RGO), this study has been research by Yang et al. in 2018. [86] The product has several advantages, mainly in methanol electrooxidation. There are SiO2 particles that help the spreading of Pd NPs and prevent the aggregation of rGO, and also moderate the rGO strategy. Pd/SiO2@RGO shows an excellent durability because it has the highest retained current density of 308.5 mA/mg and the lowest current decay speed of 19.3% during 1500 s.
In 2018, Nguyen et al. [87] find out for an photocatalytic application under visible irradiation by using convenient simple self-assembly to mixing lanthanum copper sulfur (LaCuS2) with mesoporous silica and graphene oxide, in order to shape a new ternary catalyst. The result has a pore size of around 5.83 nm with excellent photocatalytic characteristics. Under pH 11, the rate degrades by almost 100% until pH 9, which means an enhanced dye removal percentage. Furthermore, the optimum amount is 0.05 g for the gallic acid photocatalytic, which refers to good photocatalytic performances [87]. On the other hand, Oh et al. [88], uses TEOS and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) on a self-assembly method to create mesoporous SiO2/CdO-graphene composites (SCdOG). The result of the photocatalytic degradation achieves almost 100% Methylene Blue (MB) organic dye removal after the adsorption equilibrium for 2 h, as shown in Figure 8. Furthermore, the adsorption capability was the highest in the case of MB dye, compared with the other dyes. Besides that, this work opens a way to elevate the photocatalytic activity of gallic acid at ambient conditions without any further different oxidation processes, as well as for developing an efficient hetero-system for hydrogen production.
The composite that contains mesoporous silica layers within an encapsulating graphene nanosheet supported by an ultrafine metal was studied by Shang et al. in 2014 [89], and was developed by Sarkar et al. in 2019 [90] by changing metal uses with Cu. Besides producing the structure with the desire properties, their research is also trying to provide a catalyst which can be useful in chemical reactions. Shang et al. found catalysts with high activity and stability, and great recycling and reusability. Catalytic performance is enhanced by SiO2 layers, and can be deactivated by feedstock poisoning.
Here, the applications and challenges for graphene/silica composites are compared as seen in Table 3.
From the application of graphene-silica hybrid composite, we summarized the properties of graphene, silica and graphene/silica composites and its potential applications which is depicted in the Table 4:

4. Conclusions and Future Prospects

Various advances in synthesis methods and applications related to silica, graphene, and graphene/silica hybrid composites have been reviewed in this paper. Graphene and silica have become interesting materials for use in various fields because of their special properties. Graphene and its derivatives have properties such as a large surface area, high electrical conductivity, high thermal conductivity, high mechanical strength, great optical transmittance, high modulus of elasticity, and high electron intrinsic mobility. Silica has a wide application based on its various properties such as low density, tendency to produce the strength and hardness of ceramic materials, high porous, ultra-lightweight, biocompatibility, nanostructured properties, high specific surface area, and gas adsorption capacity due to the presence of its micro and mesopores. The several major findings for this review are (1) the current progress of strategy for synthesis graphene/silica was described with their advantages and potential applications; (2) The combination of graphene with silica in graphene/silica hybrid composite can avoid performance degradation of materials caused by agglomeration of graphene and greatly increasing specific surface area and biocompatibility. On the other hand, graphene can provide excellent mechanical properties and a high electrical and thermal conductivity. (3) The combination of graphene and silica in graphene/silica hybrid composites can form a synergistic effect to produce excellent properties. These excellent properties of graphene/silica contribute to spacious application prospects in many fields such as energy storage, catalysts, adsorbent, and biomedicine.
One of the challenges of silica/graphene-based composites is the difficulty of maximizing electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, and electromagnetic shielding together because of their high surface areas and chemical stability that tend to resist losses. The development of new fabrication methods need to be carried out by taking into account the optimization of components and the interactions between the components graphene and silica, as well as the structure and property relationships, in order to efficiently produce properties suitable for the desired application. In this way, SiO2/graphene composites can produce extraordinary properties that can open new technological opportunities in various fields.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H.; wrote the paper, M.H., N.N., A.N., A.B.P., E.F., E.S. and F.F.; writing—review and editing, M.H.; supervision, M.H. and A.R.; project administration, M.H.; funding acquisition, M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), grant number 26/A/DT/2021.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Komarneni, S. Nanocornposites. J. Mater. Chem. 1992, 2, 1219–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Thostenson, E.; Li, C.; Chou, T. Nanocomposites in context. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 491–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bogue, R. Nanocomposites: A review of technology and applications. Assem. Autom. 2011, 31, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sonawane, G.H.; Patil, S.P.; Sonawane, S.H. Nanocomposites and Its Applications. In Applications of Nanomaterials; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nanosci. Technol A Collect. Rev. Nat. J. 2009, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  6. Handayani, M.; Sulistiyono, E.; Rokhmanto, F.; Darsono, N.; Fransisca, P.L.; Erryani, A.; Wardono, J.T. Fabrication of Graphene Oxide/Calcium Carbonate/Chitosan Nanocomposite Film with Enhanced Mechanical Properties. IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 578, 12073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alvial-Palavicino, C.; Konrad, K. The rise of graphene expectations: Anticipatory practices in emergent nanotechnologies. Futures 2019, 109, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Latiff, N.M.; Fu, X.; Mohamed, D.K.; Veksha, A.; Handayani, M.; Lisak, G. Carbon based copper(II) phthalocyanine catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction: Effect of carbon support on electrocatalytic activity. Carbon 2020, 168, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Krisnandi, Y.K.; Abdullah, I.; Prabawanta, I.B.G.; Handayani, M. In-situ hydrothermal synthesis of nickel nanoparticle/reduced graphene oxides as catalyst on CO2 methanation. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing LLC: Melville, NY, USA, 2020; Volume 2242, p. 40046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abergel, D.; Apalkov, V.; Berashevich, J.; Ziegler, K.; Chakraborty, T. Properties of graphene: A theoretical perspective. Adv. Phys. 2010, 59, 261–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tsang, A.C.H.; Huang, H.; Xuan, J.; Wang, H.; Leung, D. Graphene materials in green energy applications: Recent development and future perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 120, 109656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, Y.; Murali, S.; Cai, W.; Li, X.; Suk, J.W.; Potts, J.R.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene-based Materials: Graphene and Graphene Oxide: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications (Adv. Mater. 35/2010). Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3906–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Papageorgiou, D.G.; Kinloch, I.A.; Young, R.J. Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 90, 75–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Soldano, C.; Mahmood, A.; Dujardin, E. Production, properties and potential of graphene. Carbon 2010, 48, 2127–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zainal, N.S.; Mohamad, Z.; Mustapa, M.S.; Badarulzaman, N.A.; Zulkifli, A.Z.; Bhd, S.A.N.S.S. The Ability of Crystalline and Amorphous Silica from Rice Husk Ash to Perform Quality Hardness for Ceramic Water Filtration Membrane. Int. J. Integr. Eng. 2019, 11, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mulyati, S.; Muchtar, S.; Yusuf, M.; Arahman, N.; Sofyana, S.; Rosnelly, C.M.; Fathanah, U.; Takagi, R.; Matsuyama, H.; Shamsuddin, N.; et al. Production of High Flux Poly(Ether Sulfone) Membrane Using Silica Additive Extracted from Natural Resource. Membranes 2020, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sharma, J.; Polizos, G. Hollow Silica Particles: Recent Progress and Future Perspectives. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zulfiqar, U.; Subhani, T.; Husain, S.W. Synthesis and characterization of silica nanoparticles from clay. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2016, 4, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, J.-J.; Li, H.-J.; Zhou, X.-H.; Li, E.-Z.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.-L.; Feng, Z.-S. Efficient synthesis of hollow silica microspheres useful for porous silica ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 13907–13912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abbas, N.; Khalid, H.R.; Ban, G.; Kim, H.T.; Lee, H. Silica aerogel derived from rice husk: An aggregate replacer for lightweight and thermally insulating cement-based composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 195, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sdiri, A.; Higashi, T.; Bouaziz, S.; Benzina, M. Synthesis and characterization of silica gel from siliceous sands of southern Tunisia. Arab. J. Chem. 2014, 7, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ismail, A.; Saputri, L.N.M.Z.; Dwiatmoko, A.A.; Susanto, B.H.; Nasikin, M. A facile approach to synthesis of silica nanoparticles from silica sand and their application as superhydrophobic material. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2021, 9, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qian, H.; Li, W.; Wang, X.; Xie, F.; Li, W.; Qu, Q. Simultaneous growth of graphene/mesoporous silica composites using liquid precursor for HPLC separations. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 537, 148101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ma, M.; Li, H.; Xiong, Y.; Dong, F. Rational design, synthesis, and application of silica/graphene-based nanocomposite: A review. Mater. Des. 2021, 198, 109367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Azat, S.; Sartova, Z.; Bekseitova, K.; Askaruly, K. Extraction of high-purity silica from rice husk via hydrochloric acid leaching treatment. Turk. J. Chem. 2019, 43, 1258–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, Y.; He, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Shen, T.; Chen, Y.; Yang, D.-Q.; Sacher, E.; Jifan, Z. Synthesis of amorphous SiO2 nanowires by one-step low temperature hydrothermal process. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 115202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meléndez-Ortiz, H.I.; Mercado-Silva, A.; García-Cerda, L.A.; Castruita, G.; Perera-Mercado, Y.A. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica MCM-41 Using Commercial Sodium Silicate. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2017, 57, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Park, J.; Gu, Y.; Park, S.; Hwang, E.; Sang, B.-I.; Chun, J.; Lee, J. Two-Stage Continuous Process for the Extraction of Silica from Rice Husk Using Attrition Ball Milling and Alkaline Leaching Methods. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sulistiyono, E.; Handayani, M.; Prasetyo, A.B.; Irawan, J.; Febriana, E.; Firdiyono, F.; Yustanti, E.; Sembiring, S.N.; Nugroho, F.; Muslih, E.Y. Implementation of sulfuric acid leaching for aluminum and iron removal for improvement of low-grade silica from quartz sand of Sukabumi, Indonesia. East. Eur. J. Enterp. Technol. 2021, 3, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Febriana, E.; Manurung, U.A.B.; Prasetyo, A.B.; Handayani, M.; Muslih, E.Y.; Nugroho, F.; Sulistiyono, E.; Firdiyono, F. Dissolution of quartz sand in sodium hydroxide solution for producing amorphous precipitated silica. IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 858, 012047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gao, F.; Peng, Z.; Fu, X. One-Step Synthesis and Characterization of Silica Nano-/Submicron Spheres by Catalyst-Assisted Pyrolysis of a Preceramic Polymer. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cho, K.; Chang, H.; Kil, D.S.; Park, J.; Jang, H.D.; Sohn, H.Y. Mechanisms of the Formation of Silica Particles from Precursors with Different Volatilities by Flame Spray Pyrolysis. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Avouris, P.; Dimitrakopoulos, C. Graphene: Synthesis and applications. Mater. Today 2012, 15, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Edwards, R.S.; Coleman, K.S. Graphene synthesis: Relationship to applications. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 38–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Z.; Fraser, A.; Ye, S.; Merle, G.; Barralet, J.E. Top-down bottom-up graphene synthesis. Nano Futur. 2019, 3, 042003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Potts, J.R.; Dreyer, D.R.; Bielawski, C.W.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polymers 2011, 52, 5–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cooper, D.R.; D’Anjou, B.; Ghattamaneni, N.; Harack, B.; Hilke, M.; Horth, A.; Majlis, N.; Massicotte, M.; Vandsburger, L.; Whiteway, E.; et al. Experimental Review of Graphene. ISRN Condens. Matter Phys. 2012, 2012, 501686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Eswaraiah, V.; Aravind, S.S.J.; Ramaprabhu, S. Top down method for synthesis of highly conducting graphene by exfoliation of graphite oxide using focused solar radiation. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 6800–6803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Handayani, M.; Kepakisan, K.A.A.; Anshori, I.; Darsono, N.; Thaha, Y.N. Graphene oxide based nanocomposite modified screen printed carbon electrode for qualitative cefixime detection. Proc. Int. Semin. Metall. Mater. Accel. Res. Innov. Metall. Mater. Incl. Sustain. Ind. 2021, 2382, 40005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, H.; Abdala, A.A.; MacOsko, C.W. Graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 6515–6530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Febriana, E.; Handayani, M.; Susilo, D.N.A.; Yahya, M.S.; Ganta, M.; Sunnardianto, G.K. A simple approach of synthesis of graphene oxide from pure graphite: Time stirring duration variation. Proc. Int. Semin. Metall. Mater. Accel. Res. Innov. Metall. Mater. Incl. Sustain. Ind. 2021, 2382, 40006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Handayani, M.; Ganta, M.; Susilo, D.N.A.; Yahya, M.S.; Sunnardianto, G.K.; Darsono, N.; Sulistiyono, E.; Setiawan, I.; Lestari, F.P.; Erryani, A. Synthesis of graphene oxide from used electrode graphite with controlled oxidation process. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 541, 12032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Abbas, A.; Eng, X.E.; Ee, N.; Saleem, F.; Wu, D.; Chen, W.; Handayani, M.; Tabish, T.A.; Wai, N.; Lim, T.M. Development of reduced graphene oxide from biowaste as an electrode material for vanadium redox flow battery. J. Energy Storage 2021, 41, 102848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, H.; He, G.; Zhu, J.; Bei, F.; Sun, X.; Wang, X. Synthesis and characterization of graphene paper with controllable properties via chemical reduction. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 14631–14638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, X.; Li, K.; Li, H.; Lu, J.; Fu, Q.; Chu, Y. Graphene nanosheets synthesis via chemical reduction of graphene oxide using sodium acetate trihydrate solution. Synth. Met. 2014, 193, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Toh, S.Y.; Loh, K.S.; Kamarudin, S.K.; Daud, W.R.W. Graphene production via electrochemical reduction of graphene oxide: Synthesis and characterisation. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 251, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, J.; Yang, H.; Zhen, S.G.; Poh, C.K.; Chaurasia, A.; Luo, J.; Wu, X.; Yeow, E.K.L.; Sahoo, N.G.; Lin, J.; et al. A Green Approach to the Synthesis of High-Quality Graphene Oxide Flakes via Electrochemical Exfoliation of Pencil Core. RSC Adv. 2013, 207890, 8669–8679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Parvez, K.; Li, R.; Puniredd, S.R.; Hernandez, Y.; Hinkel, F.; Wang, S.; Feng, X.; Mullen, K. Electrochemically exfoliated graphene as solution-processable, highly conductive electrodes for organic electronics. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3598–3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Wu, H.; Zhao, W.; Hu, H.; Chen, G. One-step in situ ball milling synthesis of polymer-functionalized graphene nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 8626–8632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mondal, O.; Mitra, S.; Pal, M.; Datta, A.; Dhara, S.; Chakravorty, D. Reduced graphene oxide synthesis by high energy ball milling. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 161, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lin, C.; Yang, L.; Ouyang, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Zhu, M. A new method for few-layer graphene preparation via plasma-assisted ball milling. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 728, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, X.; Magnuson, C.W.; Venugopal, A.; Tromp, R.M.; Hannon, J.B.; Vogel, E.M.; Colombo, L.; Ruoff, R.S. Large-Area Graphene Single Crystals Grown by Low-Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition of Methane on Copper. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 2816–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, X.; Magnuson, C.W.; Venugopal, A.; An, J.; Suk, J.W.; Han, B.; Borysiak, M.; Cai, W.; Velamakanni, A.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Graphene Films with Large Domain Size by a Two-Step Chemical Vapor Deposition Process. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 4328–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Liu, H.; Liu, Y. Controlled Chemical Synthesis in CVD Graphene. Phys. Sci. Rev. 2017, 2, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, Y.; Wang, B.; Ma, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, F.; Chen, Y. Efficient and large-scale synthesis of few-layered graphene using an arc-discharge method and conductivity studies of the resulting films. Nano Res. 2010, 3, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kim, S.; Song, Y.; Wright, J.; Heller, M.J. Graphene bi- and trilayers produced by a novel aqueous arc discharge process. Carbon 2016, 102, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, Z.-S.; Ren, W.; Gao, L.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Z.; Liu, B.; Tang, D.; Yu, B.; Jiang, C.; Cheng, H.-M. Synthesis of Graphene Sheets with High Electrical Conductivity and Good Thermal Stability by Hydrogen Arc Discharge Exfoliation. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yi, G.; Xing, B.; Zeng, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Cao, J.; Chen, L. One-Step Synthesis of Hierarchical Micro-Mesoporous SiO2/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites for Adsorption of Aqueous Cr(VI). J. Nanomater. 2017, 2017, 6286549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Oh, B.; Oh, J.-S.; Lee, E.-J.; Han, C.-M. Synthesis of uniformly dispersed silica/graphene oxide composite hydrogel using acid/base combinatorial catalysts system. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 26, 101841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Haeri, S.; Asghari, M.; Ramezanzadeh, B. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of an epoxy composite through inclusion of graphene oxide nanosheets functionalized with silica nanoparticles through one and two steps sol-gel routes. Prog. Org. Coatings 2017, 111, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, M.; Ma, L.; Li, B.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, H.; Wu, G.; Huang, Y.; Song, G. One-step generation of silica particles onto graphene oxide sheets for superior mechanical properties of epoxy composite and scale application. Compos. Commun. 2020, 22, 100514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, W.L.; Choi, H.J. Silica-Graphene Oxide Hybrid Composite Particles and Their Electroresponsive Characteristics. Langmuir 2012, 28, 7055–7062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chen, L.; Chai, S.; Liu, K.; Ning, N.; Gao, J.; Liu, Q.; Chen, F.; Fu, Q. Enhanced Epoxy/Silica Composites Mechanical Properties by Introducing Graphene Oxide to the Interface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 4398–4404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ye, W.; Zhang, L.; Li, C. Facile fabrication of silica–polymer–graphene collaborative nanostructure-based hybrid materials with high conductivity and robust mechanical performance. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 25450–25456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, P.; Liang, Q.; Luo, H.; Fang, W.; Geng, J. Synthesis of nano-scale zero-valent iron-reduced graphene oxide-silica nano-composites for the efficient removal of arsenic from aqueous solutions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 33507–33516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, X.; Pei, Y.; Lu, M.; Lu, X.; Du, X. Highly efficient adsorption of heavy metals from wastewaters by graphene oxide-ordered mesoporous silica materials. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 2113–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Lu, M.; Teng, R.; Du, X. Facile synthesis of phenyl-modified magnetic graphene/mesoporous silica with hierarchical bridge-pore structure for efficient adsorption of pesticides. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 198, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, F.; Wu, Z.; Wang, D.; Yu, J.; Jiang, X.; Chen, X. Magnetic porous silica–graphene oxide hybrid composite as a potential adsorbent for aqueous removal of p -nitrophenol. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 490, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, W.; Motuzas, J.; Zhao, X.S.; da Costa, J.C.D. 2D/3D amine functionalised sorbents containing graphene silica aerogel and mesoporous silica with improved CO2 sorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 222, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhao, B.; Sun, T.; Zhou, X.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, K.; Dong, L.; Wei, D. Three-dimensional graphene composite containing graphene-SiO2 nanoballs and its potential application in stress sensors. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Zhang, L.L.; Zhou, R.; Zhao, X.S. Graphene-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 5983–5992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ghosh, A.; Miah, M.; Majumder, C.; Bag, S.; Chakravorty, D.; Saha, S.K. Synthesis of multilayered structure of nano-dimensional silica glass/reduced graphene oxide for advanced electrochemical applications. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 5539–5549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, M.; Kim, H.K. Ultraviolet-enhanced photodetection in a graphene/SiO2/Si capacitor structure with a vacuum channel. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 104504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Du, Y.; Liu, L.; Xiang, Y.; Zhang, Q. Enhanced electrochemical capacitance and oil-absorbability of N-doped graphene aerogel by using amino-functionalized silica as template and doping agent. J. Power Sources 2018, 379, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lu, L.; Han, X.; Li, J.; Hua, J.; Ouyang, M. A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources 2013, 226, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, H.; Lu, C. Preparation of three-dimensional graphene networks for use as anode of lithium ion batteries. Funct. Mater. Lett. 2013, 6, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yin, L.-H.; Wu, M.; Li, Y.-P.; Wu, G.-L.; Wang, Y.-K.; Wang, Y. Synthesis of SiO2 @carbon-graphene hybrids as anode materials of lithium-ion batteries. New Carbon Mater. 2017, 32, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, M.-S.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Jia, R.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, F.-Y.; Yang, Z.-L.; Huang, Y.; Li, X.; Xu, W. Facile electrostatic self-assembly of silicon/reduced graphene oxide porous composite by silica assist as high performance anode for Li-ion battery. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 456, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kim, J.; Kim, D.; Ryu, J.H.; Yoon, S. One pot synthesis of ordered mesoporous carbon–silica–titania with parallel alignment against graphene as advanced anode material in lithium ion batteries. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 71, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kim, K.H.; Jun, Y.-S.; Gerbec, J.A.; See, K.A.; Stucky, G.D.; Jung, H.-T. Sulfur infiltrated mesoporous graphene–silica composite as a polysulfide retaining cathode material for lithium–sulfur batteries. Carbon 2014, 69, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Zhao, Z.; Zheng, L.; Hu, W.; Zheng, H. Synergistic effect of silane and graphene oxide for enhancing the photoelectrochemical water oxidation performance of WO3NS arrays. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 292, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. He, D.; Li, X.; He, X.; Wang, K.; Tang, J.; Yang, X.; He, X.; Yang, X.; Zou, Z. Noncovalent assembly of reduced graphene oxide and alkyl-grafted mesoporous silica: An effective drug carrier for near-infrared light-responsive controlled drug release. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 5588–5594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gui, W.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Yu, D.; Ma, Q. N-Doped graphene quantum dot@mesoporous silica nanoparticles modified with hyaluronic acid for fluorescent imaging of tumor cells and drug delivery. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Song, Y.-Y.; Li, C.; Yang, X.-Q.; An, J.; Cheng, K.; Xuan, Y.; Shi, X.-M.; Gao, M.-J.; Song, X.-L.; Zhao, Y.-D.; et al. Graphene oxide coating core–shell silver sulfide@mesoporous silica for active targeted dual-mode imaging and chemo-photothermal synergistic therapy against tumors. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 4808–4820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shao, L.; Zhang, R.; Lu, J.; Zhao, C.; Deng, X.; Wu, Y. Mesoporous Silica Coated Polydopamine Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide for Synergistic Targeted Chemo-Photothermal Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 1226–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yang, F.; Zhang, B.; Dong, S.; Tang, Y.; Hou, L.; Chen, Z.; Li, Z.; Yang, W.; Xu, C.; Wang, M.; et al. Silica nanosphere supported palladium nanoparticles encapsulated with graphene: High-performance electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation reaction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 452, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Nguyen, D.C.T.; Woo, J.-H.; Cho, K.Y.; Jung, C.-H.; Oh, W.-C. Highly efficient visible light driven photocatalytic activities of the LaCuS2-graphene composite-decorated ordered mesoporous silica. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 205, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Oh, W.-C.; Nguyen, D.C.T.; Areerob, Y. Novel cadmium oxide-graphene nanocomposite grown on mesoporous silica for simultaneous photocatalytic H2-evolution. Chemosphere 2020, 239, 124825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Shang, L.; Bian, T.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, D.; Wu, L.-Z.; Tung, C.-H.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, T. Graphene-Supported Ultrafine Metal Nanoparticles Encapsulated by Mesoporous Silica: Robust Catalysts for Oxidation and Reduction Reactions. Angew Chem. 2014, 126, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sarkar, C.; Pendem, S.; Shrotri, A.; Dao, D.Q.; Mai, P.P.T.; Ngoc, T.N.; Chandaka, D.R.; Rao, T.V.; Trinh, Q.T.; Sherburne, M.P.; et al. Interface Engineering of Graphene-Supported Cu Nanoparticles Encapsulated by Mesoporous Silica for Size-Dependent Catalytic Oxidative Coupling of Aromatic Amines. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 11722–11735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of G/SiO2 composite growth mechanism. This figure is reproduced from ref. [23] with the required copyright permission.
Figure 1. Schematic of G/SiO2 composite growth mechanism. This figure is reproduced from ref. [23] with the required copyright permission.
Crystals 11 01337 g001
Figure 2. TEM images of G/SiO2 composites prepared with different organic solvents as carbon sources. (A), toluene; (B), xylene; (C), mesitylene; (D), n-hexane; (E), n-heptane; (F), cyclohexane. This figure is reproduced from ref. [23] with required copyright permission.
Figure 2. TEM images of G/SiO2 composites prepared with different organic solvents as carbon sources. (A), toluene; (B), xylene; (C), mesitylene; (D), n-hexane; (E), n-heptane; (F), cyclohexane. This figure is reproduced from ref. [23] with required copyright permission.
Crystals 11 01337 g002
Figure 3. (a) SEM image of pure graphite, (b) SEM image of GO, (c) SEM image of Si-GO hybrid composite (d) TEM image of pure graphite, (e) TEM image of GO, (f) TEM image of Si-GO hybrid composite. This figure is reproduced from ref. [62] with the required copyright permission.
Figure 3. (a) SEM image of pure graphite, (b) SEM image of GO, (c) SEM image of Si-GO hybrid composite (d) TEM image of pure graphite, (e) TEM image of GO, (f) TEM image of Si-GO hybrid composite. This figure is reproduced from ref. [62] with the required copyright permission.
Crystals 11 01337 g003
Figure 4. SEM image of (a) Raw SiO2, (b) Created SiO2-GO hybrid, TEM of (c) Core shell structured SiO2-GO hybrid, (d) Graphene encapsulating silica sphere. This figure is reproduced from ref. [63] with required copyright permission.
Figure 4. SEM image of (a) Raw SiO2, (b) Created SiO2-GO hybrid, TEM of (c) Core shell structured SiO2-GO hybrid, (d) Graphene encapsulating silica sphere. This figure is reproduced from ref. [63] with required copyright permission.
Crystals 11 01337 g004
Figure 5. CO2 sorption kinetics of (a) 2D/3D G-Si aerogel/SBA-15 (4.7 wt.%) loaded with TEPA 80 wt.% and (b) short term isotherms by varying the TEPA loading. This figure is reproduced from ref. [69] with the required copyright permission.
Figure 5. CO2 sorption kinetics of (a) 2D/3D G-Si aerogel/SBA-15 (4.7 wt.%) loaded with TEPA 80 wt.% and (b) short term isotherms by varying the TEPA loading. This figure is reproduced from ref. [69] with the required copyright permission.
Crystals 11 01337 g005
Figure 6. (a) CV curves of p Si/rGO at a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1 in the potential range of 0.01-3.0 V (vs. Li/Li+). (b) Rate capability of p Si/rGO and Si/rGO. Galvanostatic discharge/charge curves of (c) Si/rGO and (d) p Si/rGO; (e) Cycling performance of p Si/rGO and Si/rGO at 0.2 A g−1; (f) Cycling performance of p Si/rGO 1.0 A g−1 in a potential range of 0.01–1.5 V vs. Li/Li+. The loading mass of active material is 1.1 mg/cm2. This figure is reproduced from ref. [78] with required copyright permission.
Figure 6. (a) CV curves of p Si/rGO at a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1 in the potential range of 0.01-3.0 V (vs. Li/Li+). (b) Rate capability of p Si/rGO and Si/rGO. Galvanostatic discharge/charge curves of (c) Si/rGO and (d) p Si/rGO; (e) Cycling performance of p Si/rGO and Si/rGO at 0.2 A g−1; (f) Cycling performance of p Si/rGO 1.0 A g−1 in a potential range of 0.01–1.5 V vs. Li/Li+. The loading mass of active material is 1.1 mg/cm2. This figure is reproduced from ref. [78] with required copyright permission.
Crystals 11 01337 g006
Figure 7. In vivo anti-tumor activity of pRGO@MS(DOX)-HA nanocomposite. (A) IR thermal images of HeLa tumor-bearing mice upon 808 nm-laser irradiation for different periods of time. (B) Representative images of mice bearing HeLa tumors after different treatments for varied time periods. (C) Temperature variation curves of tumor regions recorded by the IR thermal camera during NIR laser irradiation. (D) Tumor growth curves of mice after various treatments (five mice for each group). (E) The average body weights of mice after various treatments. (F) Representative H&E sections of tumors after treatment with saline, DOX, pRGO@MS-HA, pRGO@MS-HA+NIR, pRGO@MS(DOX)-HA, pRGO@MS(DOX)-HA+NIR. This figure is reproduced from ref. [85] with the required copyright permission.
Figure 7. In vivo anti-tumor activity of pRGO@MS(DOX)-HA nanocomposite. (A) IR thermal images of HeLa tumor-bearing mice upon 808 nm-laser irradiation for different periods of time. (B) Representative images of mice bearing HeLa tumors after different treatments for varied time periods. (C) Temperature variation curves of tumor regions recorded by the IR thermal camera during NIR laser irradiation. (D) Tumor growth curves of mice after various treatments (five mice for each group). (E) The average body weights of mice after various treatments. (F) Representative H&E sections of tumors after treatment with saline, DOX, pRGO@MS-HA, pRGO@MS-HA+NIR, pRGO@MS(DOX)-HA, pRGO@MS(DOX)-HA+NIR. This figure is reproduced from ref. [85] with the required copyright permission.
Crystals 11 01337 g007
Figure 8. (a) SCdOG nanocomposite for the different cationic dyes degradation under visible light irradiation. (b) Adsorption capability of SCdOG nanocomposites for MB removal.The experiments were carried out with a neutral pH. This figure is reproduced from ref. [88] with the required copyright permission.
Figure 8. (a) SCdOG nanocomposite for the different cationic dyes degradation under visible light irradiation. (b) Adsorption capability of SCdOG nanocomposites for MB removal.The experiments were carried out with a neutral pH. This figure is reproduced from ref. [88] with the required copyright permission.
Crystals 11 01337 g008
Table 1. Comparison of the result and method of silica synthesis.
Table 1. Comparison of the result and method of silica synthesis.
PaperSource of SilicaMethodPurity (%)Particle Size (nm)ProductSurface Area (m2/g)
Abbas, et al. (2019) [20]Rice huskSol-gel--Mesoporous760
Ismail, et al. (2021) [22]Silica sandSol-gel-170.3 ± 14.3Nanoparticle-
Sdiri, et al. (2014) [21]Siliceous sandSol-gel88.8–97.5-Micro and mesoporous340
Zhu Y, et al. (2019) [26]Silicate glassHydrothermal-20–100Amorphous nanowires-
Ortiz, et al. (2013) [27]Sodium silicateHydrothermal-200–500Mesoporous860–1028
Azat, et al. (2019) [25]Rice huskLeaching98.2–99.7-Amorphous120–980
Park, et al. (2021) [28]Rice huskLeaching98,5-Amorphous silica1973
Zainal, et al. (2019) [15]Rice huskLeaching98-Amorphous and crystalline-
Gao, et al. (2013) [31]Polylazane preceramic powderPyrolysis-600–800Nano-/submicron spheres-
Cho, et al. (2009) [32]TEOS and silicate acidPyrolysis-9.6–33.5Particle81,4
Table 2. Several processing methods for synthesis of graphene–silica hybrid composites.
Table 2. Several processing methods for synthesis of graphene–silica hybrid composites.
NoComposites Processing MethodStrengthWeaknessRef.
1Graphene/mesoporous silica (G/SiO2)HydrothermalGraphene does not need to be prepared in advance, graphene
and silica layer overlapped to form intercalation, uniformly distribution, organic
solvents can be used as carbon sources, no toxic gas is generated during the reaction. It does not require the use of a catalyst
Graphene can only be made by adding TEOS as a precursor, if it is reacted in big open
space then the rate of chemical reactions is too slow to produce
graphene.
[23]
2SiO2/RGOHydrothermalEfficient method, easy-to-synthesize process, low cost, composites stabilityControl sheet restacking and aggregation of SiO2 nanoparticles is required[58]
3Silica/graphene oxide hydrogel Sol-gelMechanical properties of the composite hydrogel such as stiffness can be adjusted by adjusting the GO contentsIncreasing the addition of GO can weaken and decrease the mechanical properties of the hydrogel[59]
4Silica-functionalized graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets (GONs)Sol-gelUsing two different route methods which produce various results-[60]
5Silica/graphene oxide sheets epoxy compositesHydrolysisCatalysts (DETA and NH4OH) improving mechanical properties of composites by functionalization GO and forming SiO2 from a promotion of the hydrolysis of TEOS on the GO surface The mechanical properties and distribution of the resulting particles are highly dependent on the use of a catalyst[61]
6Silica-Graphene OxideHydrolysisRelatively simple, inexpensive, and fast method-[62]
7Epoxy/silica composites by introducing graphene oxideEncapsulationInterfacial structures and properties can control by using GO as a novel coupling agent-[63]
8SiO2@poly(methylmethacrylate)–reduced graphene oxide (SiO2@PMMA–rGO)EncapsulationCovalent molecular binding and strongly electrical interaction produce outstanding thermal stability, hardness, and electrical conductivityThe morphology of the composites are strongly influenced by the synthesis conditions[64]
Table 3. Applications of graphene-silica hybrid composites, advantages and challenges.
Table 3. Applications of graphene-silica hybrid composites, advantages and challenges.
NoApplications of Graphene/Silica CompositesMethodAdvantagesChallengeRef.
1Adsorbent for As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solutionelectrostatic attraction and complexationCan be composited with other materials to increase absorption efficiencyDependent on pH of the solution, unable to reach WHO drinking water standard[65]
2Adsorbent for heavy metal As, Cd, Cr, Hg, and PbSol-gelLow-cost, environmental friendly
synthesis method, highly efficient adsorption
Complicated manufacturing process[66]
3Adsorbent for pesticidesOne-step solvothermal and one-step methodLow cost and efficient adsorbentslow concentrations pesticides in complex wastewater.[67]
4Adsorbent for p-nitrophenolGrafting and core-shellHigh adsorption capacity, composites could be easily separated from solutions through an external magnetic forceThe introduction of SiO2 and GO will reduce the magnetization so that an external magnetic field is needed,
the rate of diffusion slows down in the first stage
[68]
5Adsorbent for CO2 captureFreeze-drying methodHigh CO2 sorption capacity, very stable under sorptionMorphological feature of the 2D/3D sorbent assembly is attributed to decreasing surface area and pore volume, very slow sorption kinetics[69]
6Energy storage: electrode material in supercapacitorsSol-gelspecific capacitance of the
composite is considerably higher than that of graphene and has good cyclic stability as electrode material for supercapacitor
The measurement of temperature dependent resistance for the composite in the
temperature range from 5 K–300 K was performed under cycle cryostat and high vacuum condition
[72]
7Energy storage: supercapacitor electrodeHydrothermal methodUltrahigh specific
surface area,
high capacitance and long lifetime
Need high temperature annealing process [74]
8Energy storage: as anode
materials of lithium lithium-ion batteries
Hydrothermal method and heat treatmentsenhance the electrical conductivity, and improve the electrochemical performance. [77]
9Energy storage: Lithium battery
electrode
electrostatic self-assembly
method
Enhance the electronic conductivity, provide more transfer channels for
Li+, excellent electrochemical performance
The pH value of process needs to be adjusted to help electrostatic self-assembly method [78]
10Biomedical field: drug carrier for near infraredlight-responsive controlled drug releaseCapped noncovalent bindingBiocompatible, biofriendly, efficient killing efficacy towards cancer cellsNIR light is needed to control the drug release from
mesopores to nucleus
[82]
11Biomedical field: fluorescent imaging of tumor cells
and drug delivery
Coatingenables simultaneous drug release, fluorescent monitoringMetal ion can quench the intensity
of the N-GQDs (N-Doped graphene quantum dot)
[83]
12Biomedical field: imaging and Chemo- Photothermal Synergistic
Therapy Against Tumor
Coating Core-ShellBiocompatibility, provide a basis for the early diagnosis and treatment of tumorLaser radiation are needed to produce a more effective tumor killed [84]
13Biomedical field: Chemo- Photothermal TherapyCoatingGood biocompatibility, dispersibility, excellent photothermalproperty, remarkable tumor cell killing efficiency, specificity to target tumor cellsFluoroscopy results differ in certain body parts due to organ efficiency[85]
14Catalyst: electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation reactionHydrothermal methodImprove the electrocatalytic performance, long-time endurance and superior durability. [86]
15Catalyst: photocatalytic of organic dyes, gallic acid Hydrothermal methodEnhanced photocatalytic activity for
organic dyes and gallic acid, improved the hydrogen evolution
process
[88]
16Catalyst: for Oxidation and Reduction
Reactions
Deposition–precipitation method.High catalytic activity and excellent high-temperature stabilityNanosize
catalyst can agglomerate and sinter very easily during high temperature calcination
[89]
Table 4. Properties of graphene, silica and graphene/silica composites and its potential applica-ions.
Table 4. Properties of graphene, silica and graphene/silica composites and its potential applica-ions.
NoProperties of GrapheneProperties of Silica Properties of Graphene/Silica CompositesPotential ApplicationsRef.
1Graphene and its derivatives exhibit high specific surface area, however, graphene oxide will be easily agglomerated in the aqueous solution and re-stack between layers SiO2 is a non-toxic and chemically stable material which not only easily overcomes the aggregation problem of GO but also improves the specific surface area and adsorption propertiesThe combination of graphene and silica nanoparticles enhance the specific surface area, prevent restacking of graphene sheet and produce an excellent adsorption capacityEnvironment and adsorption material[65,66,67,68]
2Graphene-based materials have excellent
chemical and physical stability and high electrical conductivity, however, graphene sheets are easy to restack
SiO2 particles could be inserted into the space between graphene sheets to produce a rigid support for flexible graphene sheets to prevent the π-π stacking of
graphene sheets
Ultrahigh specific surface area, hierarchical porous structure, high capacitance and long lifetimeEnergy storage [74,77]
3Graphene, especially graphene oxide (GO), has good water solubility, low toxicity, good biocompatibility, and easy surface modificationSilica has a high surface area, good biocompatibility, encapsulation capability in hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules, tunable morphology, and scalable synthetic
availability
The combination of graphene and silica nanoparticles exhibit excellent synergistic properties include high surface area, excellent biocompatibility, tunable morphology and low toxicity as biomedical composite materialsBiomedical application includes drug delivery system, imaging and therapy[84,85]
4Graphene shows strong catalytic activity in photocatalysis and electrocatalysis, owing to its large surface area, has excellent conductivity for electron
capture and transport
Silica has large surface area, regular pore size, thermal and chemical stability, and variable chemical functional groups. Silica can prevent the agglomeration of graphene, and enhance the electrocatalytic performance of grapheneThe combination of graphene and silica nanoparticles
integrates the advantages of the two components and shows remarkable
application prospects in improving the catalytic performance
Catalysis[86,88]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Handayani, M.; Nafi’ah, N.; Nugroho, A.; Rasyida, A.; Prasetyo, A.B.; Febriana, E.; Sulistiyono, E.; Firdiyono, F. The Development of Graphene/Silica Hybrid Composites: A Review for Their Applications and Challenges. Crystals 2021, 11, 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11111337

AMA Style

Handayani M, Nafi’ah N, Nugroho A, Rasyida A, Prasetyo AB, Febriana E, Sulistiyono E, Firdiyono F. The Development of Graphene/Silica Hybrid Composites: A Review for Their Applications and Challenges. Crystals. 2021; 11(11):1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11111337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Handayani, Murni, Nurin Nafi’ah, Adityo Nugroho, Amaliya Rasyida, Agus Budi Prasetyo, Eni Febriana, Eko Sulistiyono, and Florentinus Firdiyono. 2021. "The Development of Graphene/Silica Hybrid Composites: A Review for Their Applications and Challenges" Crystals 11, no. 11: 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11111337

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop