Next Article in Journal
Photonic Crystals
Next Article in Special Issue
The Na2−nHn[Zr(Si2O7)]∙mH2O Minerals and Related Compounds (n = 0–0.5; m = 0.1): Structure Refinement, Framework Topology, and Possible Na+-Ion Migration Paths
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Acoustic Metamaterials for Simultaneous Sound Attenuation and Air Ventilation Performances
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tilkerodeite, Pd2HgSe3, a New Platinum-Group Mineral from Tilkerode, Harz Mountains, Germany

1
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
2
Helmholtz Centre Potsdam German Research Centre for Geosciences GFZ, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
3
Eschenweg 6, D-32760 Detmold, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2020, 10(8), 687; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10080687
Submission received: 27 July 2020 / Revised: 4 August 2020 / Accepted: 6 August 2020 / Published: 8 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crystal Chemistry and Properties of Minerals)

Abstract

:
Tilkerodeite, ideally Pd2HgSe3, is a new platinum-group selenide from the Eskaborner Stollen (Adit Eskaborn) at Tilkerode, Harz Mountains, Germany. Tilkerodeite crystals occur as euhedral inclusions in tiemannite or as extremely fine-grained lamellar aggregates (grain-size up to 3 μm) in a dolomite–ankerite matrix, together with clausthalite, tiemannite, jacutingaite, stibiopalladinite, and native gold. Neighbouring Se-bearing minerals include tischendorfite and chrisstanleyite. Tilkerodeite is opaque with a metallic luster, and is flexible in blade-like crystals, with perfect basal cleavage { 001 } . In plane-polarized light, tilkerodeite is brownish-grey. It is weakly bireflectant, and weakly pleochroic in shades of light-brown and grey. The anisotropy is weak, with rotation tints in weak shades of greenish-brown and grey-brown. The range of reflectance is estimated in comparison to clausthalite with 45–50%. Electron-microprobe analyses yield the mean composition (wt. %) Se 32.68, Hg 26.33, Pt 20.62, Pd 15.89, Pb 2.72, Cu 0.66, S 0.27, total 99.17 wt. %. The empirical formula (based on six atoms pfu) is (Pd1.08Pt0.76Pb0.09Cu0.07)Σ2.00Hg0.95(Se2.98S0.07)Σ3.05. The ideal formula is Pd2HgSe3. Tilkerodeite is trigonal, with Pt4Tl2Te6-type structure, space group P 3 m1, a = 7.325(9) Å, c = 5.288(6) Å, V = 245.7(9) Å3, and Z = 2. It is the Pd-analogue of jacutingaite. Tilkerodeite formed hydrothermally, possibly involving the alteration of tiemannite by low-temperature oxidizing fluids. The new species has been approved by the IMA-CNMNC (2019-111) and is named after the locality. Tilkerode is the most important selenide-bearing occurrence in Germany and type locality of naumannite, eskebornite, and tischendorfite.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Tilkerode, in the eastern Harz Mountains, is the most important selenide deposit in Germany, which was mined for iron (hematite) and native gold in the 18 and 19 Centuries [1]. It hosts 18 confirmed selenides, and is the type locality for naumannite (Ag2Se), eskebornite (CuFeSe2), and tischendorfite (Pd8Hg3Se9) [2].
This paper provides the description of a new platinum-group element (PGE) mineral, tilkerodeite, ideally Pd2HgSe3, from Tilkerode. The new selenide was discovered as part of the re-examination of the tischendorfite co-type material (14 newly mounted and polished thick sections taken from veinlet sample No. 4154, Figure 1) and studied by polarized light microscopy (PLM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with electron-probe microanalyses (EPMA), and electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD). This sample was collected from the Eskaborner Stollen (Eskaborn adit; 51°38′3″ North, 11°19′4″ East), at the 60-m level, 5 m north of the blind shaft IV [1].
The new species and its name have been approved by the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) of the IMA, proposal n. 2019–111. The holotype polished section is housed in the Mineral Collection at the Mineralogical Institute of the Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany, under the inventory Number MiSa84670. The mineral name is for the locality.

2. Materials and Methods

Tilkerodeite was studied for appearance and optical and physical properties by polarized light microscopy (PLM). The tilkerodeite-containing sample was prepared for optical microscopy using standard diamond polishing techniques. Sample preparation involved the following machinery and materials: lapping and polishing machine type “Buehler Metaserv”, Buehler UK Ltd., Coventry, UK; grinding and polishing machine type “Kent MK 2A”, Engis Ltd., UK; “Pellon” polishing chemotextile type PAN-W, Hartfeld & Co., Allerød, Denmark; diamond suspension, water soluble (grain sizes 6 μm, 3 μm, 1 μm, 0.25 μm) type Gala-Tec GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany; and fixed abrasive steel discs, consisting of diamond in steel-binding (grain sizes 600, 800, 1200 mesh). Optical studies were performed using a “Leitz DMRM” polarizing microscope, Type 301-371-010, Leitz/Leica, Wetzlar, Germany (air-objectives: PL Fluotar 50×, aperture 0.85 BD; PL APO 100×, aperture 0.90 BD; PL APO 150×, aperture 0.90 D). Digital photomicrographs were taken using a CANON EOS 70D camera mounted on the microscope.
EPMA, high-resolution SEM, and EBSD were used to characterize the composition and structure of the new mineral and associated phases. Back-scatter electron (BSE) imaging was performed using a ZEISS 1550VP field emission SEM. EBSD analyses were performed using an HKL EBSD system on the ZEISS 1550VP SEM, operated at 20 kV and 6 nA in focused-beam mode with a 70° tilted stage and a variable pressure mode (25 Pa) using procedures described in Ma and Rossman (2008, 2009) [3,4]. The focused electron beam is several nanometers in diameter. The spatial resolution for diffracted backscatter electrons is ~30 nm in size. The EBSD system was calibrated using a single-crystal silicon standard. The structure was determined and cell constants were obtained by matching the experimental EBSD patterns with structures of Pd2HgSe3, Pt2HgSe3, other Pd–Hg–Se, and Pt–Hg–Se phases. Quantitative wavelength-dispersive (WDS) elemental microanalysis was performed using a JEOL 8200 electron microprobe (10 kV and 10 nA, focused beam). The focused electron beam was ~120 nm in diameter. Analyses were processed with the CITZAF correction procedure [5]. Mineral identification was also made by semi-quantitative energy-dispersive (EDS) elemental analysis using a JEOL 8230 electron microprobe.

3. Results

3.1. Appearance

The selenides and native gold occur in a dolomite/ankerite vein, filling fractures and cementing an older, strongly fragmented dolomite generation in a rubble breccia (Figure 1).
Tilkerodeite forms thin tabular or spindle-shaped crystals (up to 3 μm in length and 0.5 μm in width); intersertal intergrowth with clausthalite (PbSe) and tiemannite (HgSe); and, more rarely, stibiopalladinite (Pd5Sb2), jacutingaite (Pt2HgSe3), and native gold (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). Tilkerodeite crystals of this association were studied for composition and structure. In the immediate vicinity of this type of mineral assemblage occur tiemannite–(clausthalite) aggregates (of up to 2 mm in diameter), which contain large quantities of tiny, oriented lamellae of what have been identified by EPMA-EDS representing both tilkerodeite and jacutingaite (Figure 6). These aggregates have concave bulges towards the adjacent dolomite, which show distinct corrosion features. This type of inclusion-rich tiemannite is partially replaced by dolomite and/or clausthalite.

3.2. Physical and Optical Properties

Tilkerodeite is black or grey in color and possesses a black streak. It is opaque in transmitted light, exhibiting a metallic lustre. It is characterized by a distinct basal cleavage and parting parallel { 001 } . The mineral is flexible, with distinct layered structure, forming laminated crystals that are partially curved. Cathodoluminescence was not observed. The relative polishing hardness of tilkerodeite in comparison to clausthalite is estimated to ~3 Mohs.
Magnetic properties and density could not be measured owing to small grain size. Calculated density is 9.67 g·cm−3, considering the empirical formula and EBSD unit-cell data reported in Section 3.3 and Section 3.4.
In plane-polarized incident light, tilkerodeite is brownish-grey to greyish-white. In the assemblage with clausthalite, it is weakly bireflectant, and weakly pleochroic in shades of brown and grey (Figure 2). The anisotropy is weak, with rotation tints in weak shades of greenish-brown and grey-brown.
Quantitative reflectance values could not be acquired due to grain-size restrictions. The range of relative reflectance for tilkerodeite was estimated in comparison to clausthalite to 45–50%. Tilkerodeite has a slightly lower reflectance compared to neighboring jacutingaite, likely related to its comparatively larger Pd concentrations.

3.3. Chemical Composition

Table 1 compiles the analytical data for tilkerodeite (means of five spot analyses; ranges, 1δ standard deviations (SD); and probe standards).
The mean chemical composition of type tilkerodeite is (wt. %) Se 32.68, Hg 26.33, Pt 20.62, Pd 15.89, Pb 2.72, Cu 0.66, S 0.27, and sum 99.17. Considering structural data for jacutingaite [6], small quantities of Pb and Cu are probably substituting for the platinum-group elements (PGE). Insignificant S is replacing for Se. The empirical formula (based on 6 atoms pfu) is (Pd1.08Pt0.76Pb0.09Cu0.07)Σ2.00Hg0.95(Se2.98S0.07)Σ3.05. The simplified formula is (Pd,Pt)2HgSe3. The ideal formula is Pd2HgSe3, which requires Pd 32.72, Hg 30.85, Se 36.43, total 100 wt. %.

3.4. Crystal Structure

Grain size of the new mineral was too tiny to permit extraction of a fragment for conventional single-crystal X-ray analysis. However, main parameters of crystal structure could be definitely resolved by EBSD. The EBSD patterns of tilkerodeite (Figure 7) are indexed only by the P 3 m1 Pt4Tl2Te6-type structure of synthetic Pd2HgSe3 [6] and jacutingaite Pt2HgSe3 [7]. The patterns give a best fit by a scaled cell from endmember cells of Pd2HgSe3 [6] and Pt2HgSe3 [7] based on its empirical formula, with a mean angular deviation of 0.45–0.50°, revealing the cell parameters: a = 7.325(9) Å, c = 5.288(6) Å, V = 245.7(9) Å3, and Z = 2. The general error of lattice parameters was estimated from its EBSD indexing cell.
X-ray powder diffraction data (Table 2, in Å for CuKα1, Bragg-Brentano geometry) were calculated from the cell parameters of tilkerodeite, atomic coordinates of synthetic Pd2HgSe3 [6], and the temperature factors of jacutingaite Pt2HgSe3 [7], with a formula of (Pd1.17Pt0.83)HgSe3 (simplified from the empirical formula in this study), using Powder Cell version 2.4 [8].

4. Discussion

4.1. Relation to Other Species

An unknown mineral of the presumed composition Pd2HgSe3 (no analytical data provided) has been reported from Hope’s Nose, Torquay, Devon, UK [9]. It is associated with gold, chrisstanleyite, and several other selenium species and coded as UM1998-//-Se:HgPd in the IMA-CNMNC list of unvalid unnamed minerals [10].
Tilkerodeite constitutes the Pd-analogue of jacutingaite, ideally Pt2HgSe3. Table 3 summarizes structural data for both species. Type jacutingaite from the Cauê iron-ore deposit, Itabira district, Minas Gerais, Brazil, is associated with athenite Pd2(As0.75Hg0.25), potarite PdHg, and hematite and has the mean empirical formula (Pt1.46Pt0.42Cu0.10Ag0.01)Σ21.99Hg0.98Se3.04. Tilkerode is the second reported occurrence of jacutingaite, and the first reported occurrence of this species in original host rock assemblage.

4.2. Origin

A comprehensive discussion of the formation of the Pd–Pt–Hg–Pb–Sb–Se mineral assemblage at Tilkerode will be the subject of a companion paper. Here, we will focus on the origin of just tilkerodeite.
The presence of tilkerodeite in association with, or even inside, tiemannite suggests that both species are genetically related. Preliminary electron-probe microanalyses conducted in inclusion-poor domains of the associated tiemannite infers concentrations up to 0.4 wt. % Pd and 0.3 wt. % Pt, respectively. Thus, fluid-induced alteration of Pd–Pt-bearing tiemannite may have mobilized the PGE, which subsequently were re-deposited as tilkerodeite and jacutingaite via dissolution–reprecipitation reaction. The question of whether the amounts of PGE contained in HgSe were sufficient to account for all the tiny but numerous grains of both species cannot yet be conclusively answered.
The physico-chemical conditions during tilkerodeite formation are not properly constrained. The new species is most likely a secondary mineral and associated clausthalite and tiemannite have large stability fields in terms of temperature and relative selenium–sulfur fugacities. Thermodynamic data for the associated PGE species are lacking, as is the occurrence of T-critical minerals within the assemblage.

Author Contributions

C.M. performed the SEM, EBSD, and EPMA-WDS analyses and discovered the new mineral. H.-J.F. supervised the research and conducted the EPMA-EDS work. G.G. manufactured the polished sections and took care of the physical and optical data. G.G. was the first who noted the presence of jacutingaite as “unknown” species in the holotype section. H.-J.F., C.M., and G.G. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Caltech GPS Division Analytical Facility, in which the SEM, EBSD, and EPMA analyses were carried out, was partly supported by NSF Grants EAR-0318518 and DMR-0080065.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ritsuro Miyawaki, Chairman of the CNMNC, and its members for helpful comments and edits on the submitted proposal. We thank three reviewers for their constructive reviews.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tischendorf, G. Zur Genesis einiger Selenidvorkommen, insbesondere von Tilkerode im Harz. Freib. Forsch-Hefte 1959, 69, 1–168. [Google Scholar]
  2. Stanley, C.J.; Criddle, A.J.; Förster, H.-J.; Roberts, A.C. Tischendorfite, Pd8Hg3Se9: A new mineral from Tilkerode, Harz Mountains, Germany. Canad. Miner. 2002, 40, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ma, C.; Rossman, G.R. Barioperovskite, BaTiO3, a new mineral from the Benitoite Mine, California. Amer. Miner. 2008, 93, 154–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ma, C.; Rossman, G.R. Tistarite, Ti2O3, a new refractory mineral from the Allende meteorite. Amer. Miner. 2009, 94, 841–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Armstrong, J.T. CITZAF: A package of correction programs for the quantitative electron microbeam X-ray analysis of thick polished materials, thin films, and particles. Microbeam Anal. 1995, 4, 177–200. [Google Scholar]
  6. Laufek, F.; Vymazalová, A.; Drábek, M. Powder diffraction study of Pd2HgSe3. Powder Diffr. 2017, 32, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vymazalová, A.; Laufek, F.; Drábek, M.; Cabral, A.R.; Haloda, J.; Sidorinová, T.; Lehmann, B.; Galbiatti, H.F.; Drahokoupil, J. Jacutingaite, Pt2HgSe3, a new platinum-group mineral species from the Cauê iron-ore deposit, Itabira District, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Canad. Miner. 2012, 50, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kraus, W.; Nolze, G. POWDER CELL—A program for the representation and manipulation of crystal structures and calculation of the resulting X-ray powder patterns. J. Appl. Crystall. 1996, 29, 301–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paar, W.H.; Roberts, A.C.; Criddle, A.J.; Topa, D. A new mineral, chrisstanleyite, Ag2Pd3Se4, from Hope’s Nose, Torquay, Devon, England. Mineral. Mag. 1998, 62, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smith, D.G.W.; Nickel, E.H. A system for codification for unnamed minerals: Report of the Subcommittee for Unnamed Minerals of the IMA Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification. Canad. Mineral. 2007, 45, 983–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cross section through Tilkerode sample No. 4154, the co-type specimen of the tischendorfite- and chrisstanleyite-bearing dolomite/ankerite veinlet (partially reddish stained by hematite), which forms a typical rubble breccia. The position of the gold-bearing Pt–Pd–Hg–Pb–Sb–Se mineralization is marked by a green circle. Width of image 12 cm.
Figure 1. Cross section through Tilkerode sample No. 4154, the co-type specimen of the tischendorfite- and chrisstanleyite-bearing dolomite/ankerite veinlet (partially reddish stained by hematite), which forms a typical rubble breccia. The position of the gold-bearing Pt–Pd–Hg–Pb–Sb–Se mineralization is marked by a green circle. Width of image 12 cm.
Crystals 10 00687 g001
Figure 2. Reflected plane-polarized light digital image in air showing tilkerodeite (til, crème-grey) with clausthalite (cl, light-grey), jacutingaite (jac, crème-grey), native gold (light-yellow), and stibiopalladinite (st, light crème-brown), in dolomite matrix (dark-grey). Width of image 75 μm.
Figure 2. Reflected plane-polarized light digital image in air showing tilkerodeite (til, crème-grey) with clausthalite (cl, light-grey), jacutingaite (jac, crème-grey), native gold (light-yellow), and stibiopalladinite (st, light crème-brown), in dolomite matrix (dark-grey). Width of image 75 μm.
Crystals 10 00687 g002
Figure 3. SEM-back-scattered electron (BSE) image of the mineral aggregate shown in Figure 2. Areas enclosed by green rectangles are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5.
Figure 3. SEM-back-scattered electron (BSE) image of the mineral aggregate shown in Figure 2. Areas enclosed by green rectangles are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5.
Crystals 10 00687 g003
Figure 4. SEM-back-scatter electron (BSE) image of the area shown in the right rectangle in Figure 3.
Figure 4. SEM-back-scatter electron (BSE) image of the area shown in the right rectangle in Figure 3.
Crystals 10 00687 g004
Figure 5. SEM-BSE image of the area shown in the left rectangle in Figure 3.
Figure 5. SEM-BSE image of the area shown in the left rectangle in Figure 3.
Crystals 10 00687 g005
Figure 6. Reflected plane-polarized light digital image in air of a tiemannite–clausthalite aggregate containing a plethora of tiny, partly oriented lamellae of tilkerodeite and jacutingaite. The tiemannite grain shows concave bulges towards the adjacent dolomite, and is partially replaced by clausthalite (whitish-grey on the lower rim). Width of image 200 µm.
Figure 6. Reflected plane-polarized light digital image in air of a tiemannite–clausthalite aggregate containing a plethora of tiny, partly oriented lamellae of tilkerodeite and jacutingaite. The tiemannite grain shows concave bulges towards the adjacent dolomite, and is partially replaced by clausthalite (whitish-grey on the lower rim). Width of image 200 µm.
Crystals 10 00687 g006
Figure 7. (a) Electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD) pattern of one tilkerodeite crystal shown in Figure 5; (b) the pattern indexed with the P 3 m1 (Pd,Pt)2HgSe3 structure.
Figure 7. (a) Electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD) pattern of one tilkerodeite crystal shown in Figure 5; (b) the pattern indexed with the P 3 m1 (Pd,Pt)2HgSe3 structure.
Crystals 10 00687 g007
Table 1. Chemical data for tilkerodeite.
Table 1. Chemical data for tilkerodeite.
Constituent (wt. %)MeanRangeSDProbe Standard
Pd15.8915.31–16.330.40Pd
Pt20.6220.37–20.980.24Pt
Pb2.721.73–3.320.65PbS
Cu0.660.56–0.840.11Cu
Hg26.3325.27–27.060.72HgTe
Se32.6832.21–33.040.31Se
S0.270.26–0.300.02PbS
Total99.1798.51–99.750.52
Table 2. Calculated X-ray powder diffraction data for tilkerodeite (Irel > 1).
Table 2. Calculated X-ray powder diffraction data for tilkerodeite (Irel > 1).
hkld [Å]Irelhkld [Å]Irel
1006.343664101.38431
0015.288090421.36002
0114.061884021.360010
1103.662563031.35401
2003.171820331.35401
1113.010994111.33921
2012.72001001411.33921
0122.440550041.32201
1022.440540141.29421
2102.397713221.27501
1212.183742321.27501
3002.114622231.270010
0222.0309341331.24522
2022.030961141.24353
3011.963422041.22032
0311.963410241.22031
2201.8313373311.18951
1221.776154031.17901
2121.776134211.169215
0031.762751241.15771
3101.759415021.14391
2211.730433231.12232
1031.698330341.12101
3111.669423041.12101
1131.588331511.11381
0231.540742421.09189
0411.5191194221.09181
1321.464824131.08871
3121.464821431.08871
3201.455312241.07192
2131.420236001.05736
2311.40321
Note: The strongest diffraction lines are given in bold.
Table 3. Comparative data for tilkerodeite and jacutingaite.
Table 3. Comparative data for tilkerodeite and jacutingaite.
Mineral/PhaseTilkerodeiteSynthetic Pd2HgSe3Jacutingaite
formula(Pd,Pt)2HgSe3Pd2HgSe3Pt2HgSe3
crystal systemtrigonaltrigonaltrigonal
space groupP 3 m1P 3 m1P 3 m1
a [Å]7.325(9)7.3096(2)7.3477(2)
c [Å]5.288(6)5.2829(1)5.2955(1)
V3]245.7(9)244.45(1)247.59(1)
Z222
intense XRD lines [d in Å (I) hkl] 5.2831 (15) 0015.2917 (100) 001
2.7200 (100) 2012.7151 (100) 2012.7273 (16) 201
2.4376 (23) 0122.4443 (10) 012
2.0309 (34) 0222.0280 (53) 0222.0349 (18) 022
1.8313 (37) 2201.8274 (29) 220
1.7653 (37) 003
1.5191 (19) 0411.5160 (15) 041
1.3600 (10) 402
1.3240 (11) 004
1.2700 (10) 2231.2681 (11) 223
1.1692 (15) 4211.1668 (13) 421
1.0449 (11) 025
referencethis paper[6][7]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, C.; Förster, H.-J.; Grundmann, G. Tilkerodeite, Pd2HgSe3, a New Platinum-Group Mineral from Tilkerode, Harz Mountains, Germany. Crystals 2020, 10, 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10080687

AMA Style

Ma C, Förster H-J, Grundmann G. Tilkerodeite, Pd2HgSe3, a New Platinum-Group Mineral from Tilkerode, Harz Mountains, Germany. Crystals. 2020; 10(8):687. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10080687

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Chi, Hans-Jürgen Förster, and Günter Grundmann. 2020. "Tilkerodeite, Pd2HgSe3, a New Platinum-Group Mineral from Tilkerode, Harz Mountains, Germany" Crystals 10, no. 8: 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10080687

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop