Next Article in Journal
Safety of the Hypersound® Audio System in Subjects with Normal Hearing
Previous Article in Journal
Speech Intelligibility in Various Noise Conditions with the Nucleus® 5 Cp810 Sound Processor
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

One-Year Follow up of Auditory Performance in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Implanted with the Neurelec Digisonic® Sp/saphyr® Neo Cochlear Implant System

by
Déborah Borger
1,
Geneviève Lina-Granade
1,
Stéphanie Verneyre
1,
Hung Thai-Van
2,3,4,
Sonia Saaï
5,
Michel Hoen
3,*,
Dan Gnansia
3 and
Eric Truy
1,2,3
1
1ENT Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
2
University of Lyon, Lyon, France
3
Lyon Neurosciences Research Center, Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, CRNL, INSERM UMR 1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Lyon, France
4
Audiology Service and Orofacial Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
5
Oticon Medical - Neurelec, Vallauris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Audiol. Res. 2015, 5(2), 139; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.139
Submission received: 15 June 2015 / Revised: 15 June 2015 / Accepted: 1 August 2015 / Published: 12 October 2015

Abstract

This study aimed to quantify outcomes in a group of patients who were implanted with an Oticon Medical Neurelec (Vallauris, France) cochlear implant system, the Digisonic® SP/Saphyr® Neo. Ten participants took part in this preliminary study. Their speech perception capacities were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12-months after cochlear implant activation and compared to pre-implantation scores and to scores observed with former versions of the sound processor. Compared to former versions of the sound processor, patients using the Saphyr® Neo processor obtained better speech perception scores for sentences in silence at each tests session (3 months: 79%, 6 months: 82% and 12 months: 94%) compared to Digisonic® users (respectively: 58%, 69% and 75%) and Convex sound processor users (resp. 39%, 59% and 51%). These observations confirm that the technological improvements made in the Saphyr® Neo sound processor coupled with the Digisonic® implant, provided quantifiable benefits in speech perception in Quiet compared to former versions of the processor Convex and Digisonic® SP.
Keywords: Cochlear implant outcomes; tonal audiometry; speech audiometry; post-lingual deafness Cochlear implant outcomes; tonal audiometry; speech audiometry; post-lingual deafness

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borger, D.; Lina-Granade, G.; Verneyre, S.; Thai-Van, H.; Saaï, S.; Hoen, M.; Gnansia, D.; Truy, E. One-Year Follow up of Auditory Performance in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Implanted with the Neurelec Digisonic® Sp/saphyr® Neo Cochlear Implant System. Audiol. Res. 2015, 5, 139. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.139

AMA Style

Borger D, Lina-Granade G, Verneyre S, Thai-Van H, Saaï S, Hoen M, Gnansia D, Truy E. One-Year Follow up of Auditory Performance in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Implanted with the Neurelec Digisonic® Sp/saphyr® Neo Cochlear Implant System. Audiology Research. 2015; 5(2):139. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borger, Déborah, Geneviève Lina-Granade, Stéphanie Verneyre, Hung Thai-Van, Sonia Saaï, Michel Hoen, Dan Gnansia, and Eric Truy. 2015. "One-Year Follow up of Auditory Performance in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Implanted with the Neurelec Digisonic® Sp/saphyr® Neo Cochlear Implant System" Audiology Research 5, no. 2: 139. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.139

APA Style

Borger, D., Lina-Granade, G., Verneyre, S., Thai-Van, H., Saaï, S., Hoen, M., Gnansia, D., & Truy, E. (2015). One-Year Follow up of Auditory Performance in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Implanted with the Neurelec Digisonic® Sp/saphyr® Neo Cochlear Implant System. Audiology Research, 5(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.139

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop