Next Article in Journal
A Practical Tablet-Based Hearing Aid Configuration as An Exemplar Project for Students of Instrumentation
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of A Transient Noise Reduction Algorithm in Cochlear Implant Users
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Performance of Transcranial Contralateral Routing of Signal, Pre-Implanted Trimmer Digital and Digital Bone Anchored Hearing Aid in Adults with Unilateral Hearing Loss

by
Neelamegarajan Devi
*,
Suma Chatni
,
Kasetty Jagannathaiah S. Ramadevi
and
Darga Baba Fakruddin
All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Audiol. Res. 2015, 5(2), 133; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.133
Submission received: 17 March 2015 / Revised: 17 March 2015 / Accepted: 13 April 2015 / Published: 16 June 2015

Abstract

Individuals with unilateral hearing loss of severe-profound degree face listening difficulties while localizing a sound source and while perceiving speech in the presence of noise. The objective was to compare the efficacy of the digitally programmable bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA), trimmer digital BAHA and the transcranial contralateral routing of signal (T-CROS) in improving the listening performance in adults with unilateral hearing loss. Twenty-four adults with unilateral hearing loss was assessed for sound field thresholds, speech perception performance in quiet and noise (direct and indirect conditions) and the subjective quality rating of speech in unaided and aided with either T-CROS or digitally programmable BAHA or trimmer digital BAHA attached to the headband. Results indicated that the participants performed better with both the digitally programmable and the trimmer digital BAHA than the T-CROS in both quiet and noise. However, the digitally programmable BAHA performed better when the speech arrived from the poorer ear side. The current study helps in prioritizing the hearing amplification devices for the trial and also helps in arriving at the appropriate hearing amplification device for the individuals with unilateral hearing loss.
Keywords: Speech in noise; direct and indirect condition; speech perception Speech in noise; direct and indirect condition; speech perception

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Devi, N.; Chatni, S.; Ramadevi, K.J.S.; Baba Fakruddin, D. Comparison of Performance of Transcranial Contralateral Routing of Signal, Pre-Implanted Trimmer Digital and Digital Bone Anchored Hearing Aid in Adults with Unilateral Hearing Loss. Audiol. Res. 2015, 5, 133. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.133

AMA Style

Devi N, Chatni S, Ramadevi KJS, Baba Fakruddin D. Comparison of Performance of Transcranial Contralateral Routing of Signal, Pre-Implanted Trimmer Digital and Digital Bone Anchored Hearing Aid in Adults with Unilateral Hearing Loss. Audiology Research. 2015; 5(2):133. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.133

Chicago/Turabian Style

Devi, Neelamegarajan, Suma Chatni, Kasetty Jagannathaiah S. Ramadevi, and Darga Baba Fakruddin. 2015. "Comparison of Performance of Transcranial Contralateral Routing of Signal, Pre-Implanted Trimmer Digital and Digital Bone Anchored Hearing Aid in Adults with Unilateral Hearing Loss" Audiology Research 5, no. 2: 133. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.133

APA Style

Devi, N., Chatni, S., Ramadevi, K. J. S., & Baba Fakruddin, D. (2015). Comparison of Performance of Transcranial Contralateral Routing of Signal, Pre-Implanted Trimmer Digital and Digital Bone Anchored Hearing Aid in Adults with Unilateral Hearing Loss. Audiology Research, 5(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.133

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop