Next Article in Journal
Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials Test Results in Individuals with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility and Sound Localization Abilities With Hearing Aids Using Binaural Wireless Technology
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms

Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Alberta - Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine; Department of Audiology, Alberta Health Services - Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital; Department of Surgery - Otolaryngology, University of Alberta - Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, Canada
Audiol. Res. 2013, 3(1), e3; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2013.e3
Submission received: 30 May 2012 / Revised: 3 October 2012 / Accepted: 31 October 2012 / Published: 21 February 2013

Abstract

This study investigates changes in amplitude and delays in low-frequency toneburst cochlear microphonic (CM) waveforms recorded at the ear canal in response to different stimulus intensities. Ten volunteers aged 20-30 were recruited. Low-frequency CM waveforms at 500 Hz in response to a 14-ms toneburst were recorded from an ear canal electrode using electrocochleography techniques. The data was statistically analyzed in order to confirm whether the differences were significant in the effects of stimulus intensity on the amplitudes and delays of the low-frequency CM waveforms. Electromagnetic interference artifacts can jeopardize CM measurements but such artifacts can be avoided. The CM waveforms can be recorded at the ear canal in response to a toneburst which is longer than that used in ABR measurements. The CM waveforms thus recorded are robust, and the amplitude of CM waveforms is intensity-dependent. In contrast, the delay of CM waveforms is intensity-independent, which is different from neural responses as their delay or latency is intensity-dependent. These findings may be useful for development of the application of CM measurement as a supplementary approach to otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement in the clinic which is severely affected by background acoustic noise. The development of the application in the assessment of low-frequency cochlear function may become possible if a further series of studies can verify the feasibility, but it is not meant to be a substitute for audiometry or OAE measurements. The measurement of detection threshold of CM waveform responses using growth function approach may become possible in the clinic. The intensity-independent nature of CMs with regards to delay measurements may also become an impacting factor for differential diagnoses and for designing new research studies.
Keywords: cochlear microphonics; otoacoustic emissions; electrocochleography; auditory brainstem responses; ear canal electrode; low frequency cochlear microphonics; otoacoustic emissions; electrocochleography; auditory brainstem responses; ear canal electrode; low frequency

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M. Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms. Audiol. Res. 2013, 3, e3. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2013.e3

AMA Style

Zhang M. Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms. Audiology Research. 2013; 3(1):e3. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2013.e3

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Ming. 2013. "Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms" Audiology Research 3, no. 1: e3. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2013.e3

APA Style

Zhang, M. (2013). Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms. Audiology Research, 3(1), e3. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2013.e3

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop