Next Article in Journal
Chinese Guidelines Related to Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia
Previous Article in Journal
A Critical Analysis and Review of Lancet COVID-19 Hydroxychloroquine Study
 
 
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy (JMAHP) is published by MDPI from Volume 12 Issue 1 (2024). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Taylor & Francis.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Organizational Aspect in Healthcare Decision-Making: A Literature Review

by
Amélie Dubromel
1,*,
Marie-Audrey Duvinage-Vonesch
2,
Loïc Geffroy
3 and
Claude Dussart
1,3
1
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pharmacie Et Stérilisation Centrales, Saint-Genis-Laval, France
2
Pharmacy Department, Military Teaching Hospital Saint-Anne, Toulon, France
3
Laboratory “Systemic Health Care”, EA 4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2020, 8(1), 1810905; https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1810905
Submission received: 22 February 2020 / Revised: 3 August 2020 / Accepted: 12 August 2020 / Published: 31 August 2020

Abstract

Background: Organizational aspect is rarely considered in healthcare. However, it is gradually seen as one of the key aspects of the decision-making process as well as clinical and economic dimensions. Our primary objective was to identify criteria already used to assess the organizational impact of medical innovations. Our secondary objective was to structure them into an inventory to support decision-makers to select the relevant criteria for their complex decision-making issues. Materials and methods: A search using the Medline database was conducted in June 2019. The records published between January, 1990 and December, 2018 were identified. The publications cited by the authors of the included articles and the websites of health technology assessment agencies, units or learned societies identified during the search were also consulted. The identified criteria were structured in an inventory. Results: We selected 107 records of a wide range of evidence mostly published after the 2000s. We identified 636 criteria that we classified into five categories: people, task, structure, technology, and surroundings. Conclusion: Criteria selection is a crucial step in any multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). This work is the first step in the development of a validated MCDA method to assess the organizational impact of medical innovations.
Keywords: review; health technology assessment; multi-criteria decision analysis; decision-making; organizational aspect review; health technology assessment; multi-criteria decision analysis; decision-making; organizational aspect

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dubromel, A.; Duvinage-Vonesch, M.-A.; Geffroy, L.; Dussart, C. Organizational Aspect in Healthcare Decision-Making: A Literature Review. J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2020, 8, 1810905. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1810905

AMA Style

Dubromel A, Duvinage-Vonesch M-A, Geffroy L, Dussart C. Organizational Aspect in Healthcare Decision-Making: A Literature Review. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy. 2020; 8(1):1810905. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1810905

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dubromel, Amélie, Marie-Audrey Duvinage-Vonesch, Loïc Geffroy, and Claude Dussart. 2020. "Organizational Aspect in Healthcare Decision-Making: A Literature Review" Journal of Market Access & Health Policy 8, no. 1: 1810905. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1810905

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop