Appropriate diagnosis is the key factor for treatment of viral diseases [
21]. Nevertheless, viral infections are difficult to distinguish, especially at the onset. If acute infection appears, the patient presents the set of nonspecific signs and symptoms. Time is the most important factor in rapidly developing and epidemiologically dangerous diseases, such as influenza, Ebola and SARS (
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome). On the other hand, chronic viral diseases are asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic. The therapeutic success, focused on organ protection from chronic destruction and failure, e.g., in HIV-1 (
Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1) or HCV (
Hepatitis C Virus), depends on early detection of an infective agent.
It has been more than twenty years since aptamers were constructed [
2,
3]. Up to date, studies on their exploitation in viral diseases are not developed enough. They have been mostly focused on the well-known viruses, such as HIV-1, HCV, HBV (
Hepatitis B Virus), HPV (
Human Papilloma Virus), SARS and influenza [
22,
23,
24,
25,
26,
27,
28]. Studies on other viruses have not been carried out systematically, e.g., only occasional experiments were conducted with aptamers against Rift Valley Fever, Dengue or different arboviruses [
21,
29,
30].
2.1. Experimental Diagnostic Studies with Aptamers and Aptamer-Based Biosensors Conducted on Laboratory Model Samples
A particular attention was focused on influenza diagnosis, due to high risk of infection and remarkable frequency of mutations, resulting in a cyclical appearance of new viral strains with epidemic or even pandemic danger. Most recently, avian influenza was an epidemiological challenge; the disease is characterized by a severe course, high mortality rate and increased risk of zoonotic influenza strain generation. It is capable of moving from one person to another [
31,
32,
33]. Hemagglutinin (HA), a well-known influenza protein, is a glycoprotein expressed in high amounts on the viral surface. It is responsible for fusion of virus with the host cell. There are at least 18 different HA antigens, therefore, it could serve not only for infection diagnosis, but also to distinguish current influenza types and subtypes. Gopinath
et al. constructed two RNA aptamers, P30-10-16 and A-20, that specifically bind the type A and B of HA, respectively. Aptamers are able to distinguish then influenza type A from type B or even closely related strains of the same influenza subtype [
34,
35]. It should be emphasized that P30-10-16 binds target molecule (H3N2 of virus A) with more than 15-fold higher affinity, as compared to conventional anti-HA monoclonal antibody [
35]. Recently, there were also constructed aptamers able to detect influenza virus type A: H1N1 and H3N2, as well as avian virus, H5N1 [
36,
37]. Thus, it was shown that aptamers can recognize dangerous influenza strains with high epidemiological risk.
However, it is still necessary to generate simple and available technics in order to increase the benefits of aptamers. Wang and Li generated the construct able to detect avian influenza virus, assigned as aptasensor. The method was based on quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), including attachment of quartz particles to the polymeric, porous hydrogel, containing DNA aptamers [
36].
It is thought that similar methods can be used to detect other human infections, such as HIV-1 and Ebola. Tombelli
et al. generated biosensors based on SPR and QCM technique. They introduced aptamers capable of detecting the HIV-1 Tat protein, using biotin-streptavidin interaction. This approach allows for high specificity distinction between Tat and Rev (other HIV protein, structurally similar to Tat) [
24]. Ruslinda
et al. targeted the same Tat molecule, using biosensor based on the diamond field-effect transistor (FET) technique [
23].
Another important field of aptamer application are chronic infections caused by viruses of hepatitis B and C. Aptamer specific for HCV E2 glycoprotein was obtained by Park
et al. who invented a new diagnostic test—Enzyme Linked Apto-Sorbent Assay (ELASA)—which allowed not only for qualitative analysis, but also quantification of virus particles in the tested samples. Such solution could be used,
i.e., for monitoring of antiviral treatment [
38].
Liu
et al. investigated the RNA aptamer (HBs-A22) recognizing HBsAg antigen, present on infected hepatocytes. Thus, it is possible to find HBV infected cells, whereas former assays detected only antigen purified form [
25].
An important influence for viral diagnostics development with aptamers have been made by Labib
et al. who constructed gold microelectrodes with impedimetric properties in order to distinguish biologically active from inactive form of the virus. They applied heat-inactivated Vaccinia as a model. Using specific DNA aptamers they detected, the presence of the viable virus form, since the impedance was lower [
39]. Tang
et al. used the same virus and received DNA aptamer, which was capable of distinguish the infected human cells from their healthy, non-infected counterparts. The idea was based on the presence of unspecified membrane marker appearing on the cell surface [
40]. Similar study was carried out by Parekh
et al., who additionally defined the target of constructed aptamer as a glycosylated HA presented on infected cells [
41].
An important threat to the human health, due to its oncogenic potential, is Human Papilloma Virus. The type 16 of HPV is responsible for approximately 50% of all cervical cancer cases. The direct causative molecule is the viral oncoprotein E7. It is necessary to develop the line of rapid, sensitive, and less costly diagnostic tools, identifying the type of virus infection, as well as a detection of dysplastic endometrial cells with the high risk of malignant transformation. Consequently, HPV is a potential target for aptamers. Toscano-Garibay
et al. used
in vitro selection to obtain the RNA aptamer that binds viral E7 oncoprotein. As a part of the biosensor it could provide a powerful diagnostic tool [
27]. Graham and Zarbl received fluorescent-conjugated DNA aptamer able to bind superficial determinants of normal cervical epithelium. The cells that initiated malignant transformation did not bind the aptamer [
42].
Bruno
et al. generated DNA aptamers directed against pathogens of the
arbovirus family, including such viruses, such as Chikungunja, Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever, Dengue, West Nile and tickborne encephalitis. They received sequences with high specificity and affinity for both the purified, recombinant viral proteins and whole inactive viruses. They proved the value of selected sequences in projected diagnostic methods,
i.e., lateral flow chromatographic test strip and fluorescent aptamer-magnetic bead sandwich assay. They also proposed the aptamers to be used for passive immunity and antiviral prophylaxis because of the low immunogenicity. This approach could be promising in any dangerous infection with lack of efficient therapeutic alternative [
29].
The spread of Dengue Fever virus is caused by extended occurrence of its host,
Aedes aegypti mosquito, as the result of contemporary climate changes. Fletcher
et al. constructed three modular biosensors allowing for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of viral infection. It was based on the appearance of fluorescence, while the biosensor has detected the virus. The sensor contained the following modules: (i) sequence complementary to the viral genome, (ii) sequence complementary to the aptamer, (iii) aptamer-EcoRI restriction enzyme complex, (iv) DNA motive bound to fluorescence inhibitor, (v) EcoRI target sequence, and (vi) DNA fragment labeled with a fluorescent dyer (primary fluorescence was quenched by its inhibitor). When aptamer bound the viral genome, the fragment complementary to the aptamer was exposed. The conformational changes of biosensor occurred, EcoRI was released and activated. The enzyme cleaved the DNA sequence stained with fluorescent dyer with subsequent appearance of fluorescence, with intensity proportional to the number of viral copies [
21].
Table 1 shows a summary of the described methods.
Table 1.
Aptamers and aptamer-based biosensors in viral diagnostics. (n/d, no data)
Table 1.
Aptamers and aptamer-based biosensors in viral diagnostics. (n/d, no data)
Virus | Aptamer Name | Type | Target | Binding Affinity (Kd) | Detection Technique | Limit of Detection | Refs. |
---|
Influenza H5N1 | RHA0006 RHA0385 | DNA | Hemagglutinin | 15.3 nM 24.7 nM | sandwich enzyme linked aptamer assay (ELASA) | 0.1 µg/well | [37] |
n/d | surface protein | 4.65 nM | QCM-based biosensor coated with the hydrogel | 0.0128 HAU | [36] |
HIV-1 | n/d | RNA | Tat protein | 1nM | FET-based biosensor | 1.2 × 109 molecules | [23] |
n/d | QCM-based biosensor SPR-based biosensor | 0.25ppm | [24] |
HCV | E2-B E2-D | DNA | E2 glycoprotein | 4 nM 0.8 nM | enzyme linked apto-sorbent assay (ELASA) | 3.13–6.25 × 102 FFU/mL, 16 ng/mL of glycoprotein E2 | [38] |
Vaccinia | n/d | DNA | vaccinia particles | 25 nM | AptaVISens-V aptamer-based viability impedimetric sensor | 330 PFU | [39] |
PP3 | Hemagglutinin | 3.24 nM | fluorescence microscope using Alexa Fluor 594-labeled aptamer PP3 | n/d | [41] |
TV01 | surface protein | 7.3 nM | flow cytometry assay using Cy5-labeled aptamer TV01 | [40] |
HPV | 13 14 20 28 | DNA | epitopes on cell surface proteins of non-infected cells | 2.5 nM 7.1 nM 1.6 nM 6.9 nM | confocal microscope | n/d | [42] |
G5α3N.4 | RNA | oncoprotein E7 | 1.9 µM | EMSA assay | [27] |
Chikungunya, Dengue, West Nile | spectrum of selected aptamers | DNA | viral envelope proteins | spectrum of data | lateral flow chromatographic test strip fluorescent aptamer-magnetic bead sandwich assay | n/d | [29] |
Dengue | apt_EcoRI | n/d | EcoRI enzyme—one of biosensor modules | n/d | modular biosensor detecting the genetic sequences of Dengue genome | n/d | [21] |
2.3. Advantages and Disadvantages of Aptamer-Based Tests in Comparison to Other Diagnostics Methods
The current diagnostic standard for viral infections is Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) or molecular biology tests [
19,
21,
36,
41]. Commonly used ELISA is a multi-stage procedure and is considered to be not efficient enough because of relatively low sensitivity as well as high rate of false positive results [
19,
21,
36]. Moreover, it is difficult in use because of obligatory application of monoclonal antibodies, which are not available for some viral diseases [
13].
Most of the currently used immunosorbent tests are able to detect a current disease just at the moment of specific antibody formation directed against the infective agent. However, a specific host immunity develops after several weeks or months from the origin of infection. The problem is known as the so-called “window period”. In addition, some patients receive immunosuppressive therapy and the effective antibody generation may not occur [
43,
44].
Alternatively, routinely used or even experimental diagnostic molecular tests allow for direct detection of the alien genetic material, without waiting for the immune response of the host. Furthermore, the advantage of molecular assays is their extremely high sensitivity: they are able to detect single viral copies and/or early viral transcripts immediately after the onset of infection [
45,
46]. Unfortunately, due to very high costs, complicated procedures and necessity of employing highly skilled staff, they have been rarely performed.
Aptamers seem to be an appropriate response to the problems described above. They present an attractive alternative to the currently used procedures, due to their high specificity, affinity of binding to any viral antigen and low cost production. The use of biosensors equipped with the aptamers or another research techniques using these molecules allows for detection of both: early (genetic material, viral proteins) and late (host own antibodies) infection markers [
21,
23]. Furthermore, aptamers enable to distinguish between infected host cells and not infected ones and may be helpful to recognize active forms of the virus [
39,
42].
׳Table 3 compares a few of the standard diagnostic techniques used in the detection of influenza, HBV and HIV. It should be noted once again that in many cases, the use of currently available diagnostic tools have a number of disadvantages, which could be easily avoided using aptamers [
47,
48,
49,
50]. Moreover, the aptamer-based minimum threshold of detection is sometimes lower than in RT-PCR, as in case of influenza virus [
36,
49]. On the other hand, when the detection threshold is similar, or even higher as compare to currently used techniques, aptamers ensure increased sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test [
39]. Nevertheless, the time of diagnosis is also significant. As shown in
Table 4, the detection time of influenza virus using aptasensor-based technique is remarkable shorter than in other methods [
19,
47,
48,
49,
50].
Table 3.
Comparison of clinically used viral diagnostics tests.
Table 3.
Comparison of clinically used viral diagnostics tests.
Virus | Method | Detection limit | Advantages | Disadvantages | Refs. |
---|
Influenza | isolation and identification of the virus | 1 EID50/mL | sensitivity | time consuming | [47] |
ELISA | 1.0 ng | rapid | high rate of false positive results | [48] |
RT-PCR | 0.0256 HAU | specificity sensitivity | expensive complicated, highly skilled stuff | [49] |
qRT-PCR | 10 copies /reaction | [50] |
HBV | ELISA | 0.5 pg/mL | as presented above | [51] |
qRT-PCR | 18 IU/mL | [52] |
HIV | ELISA | 0.9–1.2 IU/mL | [53] |
qPCR | 18–65 copies/mL | [54] |
Table 4.
Comparison of Avian Influenza Virus detection time with different diagnostic methods.
Table 4.
Comparison of Avian Influenza Virus detection time with different diagnostic methods.
Method | Virus Isolation | ELISA | RT-PCR | qRT-PCR | SPR Aptasensor |
---|
detection time | 120–170 h | 3 h | 5 h | 3 h | 1.5 h |
2.4. Future Perspectives of Aptamers in Diagnostic Procedures
Due to the rapid growth of population and different varieties of viruses that are frequently resistant to standard therapeutic treatment, there is clearly an urgent need to develop the new diagnostic methods, characterized by high sensitivity and specificity, allowing for early and rapid pathogen detection.
Biosensor technology is probably the most rapidly growing area of the current diagnosistics of viral diseases. Aptamers are perfect example of molecular recognition biosensor element. The production cost is low, in comparison to monoclonal antibodies. They also provide sensitivity and specificity of the constructed biosensors.
We believe that aptamer-based biosensors could have been applied as promising approach in some specific issues. They could be used for cheap diagnosis at an early stage of the disease, i.e., immediately after exposure to the pathogen, as well as to monitor the treatment process. SELEX versatility and its susceptibility to modifications, as enhancement of the selective pressure, could allow obtaining aptamers detecting precisely the level of viremia, which is below the threshold of the currently used diagnostic methods. Moreover, aptamer-based approach ensures more rapid and cheaper diagnosis.
The aptamer structure might be a major constraint in their future application as diagnostic tool. Many existing aptamers are RNA molecules that are highly susceptible to degradation by nucleases. Consequently, their use as molecular-recognition element of the biosensors may be limited. This problem can be solved by synthesizing a “mirror” analog of these particles that retains their original properties, but are not cleaved by nucleases [
7]. Alternative solution includes local modifications of the ribose 2' sites in the aptamer chain [
4,
6].
In conclusion, we believe that aptamers are molecules potentially attractive for viral diagnostics.