Correction: Graillot, B.; et al. Progressive Adaptation of a CpGV Isolate to Codling Moth Populations Resistant to CpGV-M. Viruses 2014, 6, 5135–5144
by
Benoît Graillot
1,2, 
Marie Berling
1,3,
Christine Blachere-López
4,
Myriam Siegwart
5,
Samantha Besse
2 and
Miguel López-Ferber
1,* 1
LGEI, Ecole des Mines d’Alès, Institut Mines-Telecom et Université de Montpellier Sud de France. 6, Avenue de Clavières, 30319 Alès, France
2
Natural Plant Protection, Arysta LifeScience Group, Avenue Léon Blum, 64000 Pau, France
3
Present address : CREA, 215 Avenue de la Roche Parnale, ZI Motte Longue, 74130 Bonneville, France
4
INRA, 6, Avenue de Clavières, 30319 Alès, France
5
INRA, unité PSH, Agroparc, 84914 Avignon Cedex 9, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2015, 7(12), 6313-6315; https://doi.org/10.3390/v7122939
Submission received: 16 November 2015
/
Accepted: 26 November 2015
/
Published: 3 December 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Viruses)
Abstract
:In our article “Progressive Adaptation of a CpGV Isolate to Codling Moth Populations Resistant to CpGV-M.” (Viruses 2014, 6, 5135–5144; doi:10.3390/v6125135) [1] we obtained resistance values of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella, RGV laboratory colony [2], when challenged with Cydia pomonella Granulovirus, Mexican Isolate (CpGV-M), that were lower than those previously published [2]. Careful analysis of both the RGV colony and the CpGV-M virus stock used led to the realization that a low level contamination of this virus stock with CpGV-R5 occurred. We have made new tests with a verified stock, and the results are now in agreement with those previously published.
In our article “Progressive Adaptation of a CpGV Isolate to Codling Moth Populations Resistant to CpGV-M.” (Viruses 2014, 6, 5135–5144; doi:10.3390/v6125135) [1] we obtained resistance values of the RGV laboratory colony, when challenged with Cydia pomonella Granulovirus, Mexican Isolate (CpGV-M), that were lower than those previously published [2].
Careful analysis of both the RGV colony and the CpGV-M virus stock used led to the realization that a low level contamination of this virus stock with CpGV-R5 occurred.
We have made new tests with a verified stock, and the results are now in agreement with those published by Berling et al. [2] and in the same range as those obtained with another insect population, CpRR1 [3].
Below you will find the corrected Table 2 for our recently published article [1], in which line 7 has changed.
Table 2.
Pathogenicities, measured by lethal concentration (LC)50 and LC90 of four viral isolates on Cydia pomonella laboratory colonies susceptible and resistant to CpGV-M.
| Host Colony | Virus Isolate | Total No. of Insects Tested | No. of OB/µL (95% CI) | Slope ± SE | Χ2 | Resistance Factor (Fold) (a) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC50 | LC90 | LC50 | LC90 | |||||
| Susceptible | CpGV-M | 786 | 13.10 (6.55–23.20) | 223.10 (110.70–654.18) | 1.04 ± 0.09 | 5.99 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| NPP-R1 (b) | 689 | 25.80 (14.48–39.93) | 328.55 (196.93–702.51) | 1.16 ± 0.13 | 1.28 | 2.0 | 1.5 | |
| 2016-r4 (b) | 999 | 39.65 (6.40–133.91) | 805.85 (260.20–1.36 × 103) | 0.98 ± 0.11 | 13.6 | 3.0 | 3.5 | |
| 2016-r8 | 445 | 48.37 (21.18–81.44) | 280.52 (158.02–857.03) | 1.678 ± 0.25 | 4.67 | 3.7 | 1.3 | |
| 2016-r16 | 790 | 6.76 (2.6–13.37) | 59.63 (27.54–278.55) | 1.36 ± 0.13 | 11.42 | 0.5 | 0.25 | |
| Resistant | CpGV-M | 1619 | 2.22 × 106 (1.19 × 106–5.67 × 106) | --- | 0.50 ± 0.07 | 10.6 | 1.7 × 105 | --- |
| NPP-R1 (b) | 578 | 166.31 (91.21–278.27) | 1.28 × 104 (5.95 × 103–3.80 × 104) | 0.70 ± 0.08 | 4.81 | 13 | 57 | |
| 2016-r4 (b) | 1201 | 102.31 (63.20–146.91) | 1.57 × 103 (1.01 × 103–2.97 × 103) | 1.10 ± 0.10 | 6.21 | 7.8 | 7 | |
| 2016-r8 | 456 | 41.27 (26.97–58.96) | 319.24 (207.87–582.06) | 1.44 ± 0.17 | 1.83 | 3.2 | 1.5 | |
| 2016-r16 | 545 | 22.43 (13.73–34.36) | 410.67 (240.16–846.43) | 1.02 ± 0.11 | 3.60 | 1.7 | 1.8 | |
(a) The pathogenicity of CpGV-M on susceptible larvae is used as a reference level; (b) Results from [2]
As a consequence, the first paragraph in the Discussion section must also be changed:
“Codling moth resistant natural populations did not respond to control by CpGV-M. The resistance levels were variable, from a hundred-fold to more than a thousand-fold resistance as a function of the relative frequency of the resistant genotypes. The RGV resistant colony, developed from a natural population, exhibits a homogeneous resistance level against CpGV-M higher than 105 (for LC50) compared to the level for the susceptible colony.”
We apologize to the readers of Viruses for any inconvenience this may have caused.
References
- Graillot, B.; Berling, M.; Blachere-López, C.; Siegwart, M.; Besse, S.; López-Ferber, M. Progressive adaptation of a CpGV isolate to codling moth populations resistant to CpGV-M. Viruses 2014, 6, 5135–5144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berling, M.; Blachere-Lopez, C.; Soubabere, O.; Lery, X.; Bonhomme, A.; Sauphanor, B.; Lopez-Ferber, M. Cydia pomonella granulovirus genotypes overcome virus resistance in the codling moth and improve virus efficiency by selection against resistant hosts. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2009, 75, 925–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asser-Kaiser, S.; Fritsch, E.; Undorf-Spahn, K.; Kienzle, J.; Eberle, K.E.; Gund, N.A.; Reineke, A.; Zebitz, C.P.W.; Heckel, D.G.; Huber, J.; et al. Rapid emergence of baculovirus resistance in codling moth due to dominant, sex-linked inheritance. Science 2007, 317, 1916–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Graillot, B.; Berling, M.; Blachere-López, C.; Siegwart, M.; Besse, S.; López-Ferber, M. Correction: Graillot, B.; et al. Progressive Adaptation of a CpGV Isolate to Codling Moth Populations Resistant to CpGV-M. Viruses 2014, 6, 5135–5144. Viruses 2015, 7, 6313-6315. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7122939
AMA Style
Graillot B, Berling M, Blachere-López C, Siegwart M, Besse S, López-Ferber M. Correction: Graillot, B.; et al. Progressive Adaptation of a CpGV Isolate to Codling Moth Populations Resistant to CpGV-M. Viruses 2014, 6, 5135–5144. Viruses. 2015; 7(12):6313-6315. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7122939
Chicago/Turabian StyleGraillot, Benoît, Marie Berling, Christine Blachere-López, Myriam Siegwart, Samantha Besse, and Miguel López-Ferber. 2015. "Correction: Graillot, B.; et al. Progressive Adaptation of a CpGV Isolate to Codling Moth Populations Resistant to CpGV-M. Viruses 2014, 6, 5135–5144" Viruses 7, no. 12: 6313-6315. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7122939
