Next Article in Journal
Recombinant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium as a Vaccine Vector for HIV-1 Gag
Next Article in Special Issue
Evolution of Specific Antibodies and Proviral DNA in Milk of Small Ruminants Infected by Small Ruminant Lentivirus
Previous Article in Journal
Viral Subversion of the Nuclear Pore Complex
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Polytropic Caprine Arthritis Encephalitis Virus Promoter Isolated from Multiple Tissues from a Sheep with Multisystemic Lentivirus-Associated Inflammatory Disease
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Retroviral Infections in Sheep and Goats: Small Ruminant Lentiviruses and Host Interaction

Genomics and Health Group, Department of Genetics, Physical Anthropology and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Bilbao 48080, Spain
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2013, 5(8), 2043-2061;
Original submission received: 3 June 2013 / Revised: 26 July 2013 / Accepted: 5 August 2013 / Published: 19 August 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Small Ruminant Lentiviruses)


Small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLV) are members of the Retrovirus family comprising the closely related Visna/Maedi Virus (VMV) and the Caprine Arthritis-Encephalitis Virus (CAEV), which infect sheep and goats. Both infect cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage and cause lifelong infections. Infection by VMV and CAEV can lead to Visna/Maedi (VM) and Caprine Arthritis-Encephalitis (CAE) respectively, slow progressive inflammatory diseases primarily affecting the lungs, nervous system, joints and mammary glands. VM and CAE are distributed worldwide and develop over a period of months or years, always leading to the death of the host, with the consequent economic and welfare implications. Currently, the control of VM and CAE relies on the control of transmission and culling of infected animals. However, there is evidence that host genetics play an important role in determining Susceptibility/Resistance to SRLV infection and disease progression, but little work has been performed in small ruminants. More research is necessary to understand the host-SRLV interaction.

1. Small Ruminant Lentiviruses (SRLVs)

Lentiviruses are a subgroup of the Retrovirus family, which infect a wide range of species including humans and livestock species, causing slow infections that may lead to progressive degenerative diseases. Visna/Maedi Virus (VMV) and Caprine Arthritis-Encephalitis Virus (CAEV) infect sheep and goats. Phylogenetic analyses have established that they are part of a viral continuum and therefore are grouped together as Small Ruminant Lentiviruses (SRLVs) [1,2,3].

1.1. SRLV Infection and Disease

Although SRLVs can infect a variety of cells, their target cells are of the monocyte/macrophage lineage where viral expression is closely dependent on the monocyte to macrophage maturation [4,5,6,7].
SRLVs are mainly transmitted horizontally or from dam to offspring via the respiratory and lactogenic routes. Both asymptomatic and diseased animals are a source of viruses for naive animals [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
Lesions induced by SRLVs are characterized by mononuclear infiltration in target organs and persistent inflammation [17,18]. SRLVs cause Visna/Maedi (VM) in sheep and Caprine Arthritis-Encephalitis (CAE) in goats, multisystemic inflammatory diseases affecting lungs, the central nervous system (CNS), joints and mammary glands. In both cases, symptoms take several months to years to develop (see Figure 1 for disease timeline). The syndromes may be present to varying degrees in the same animal or occur independently [6,10,19,20,21,22].
Figure 1. Small Ruminant Lentivirus (SRLV) timeline. SRLVs are transmitted via the respiratory or lactogenic route. Proviral DNA transcription and gene expression is suppressed until infected monocytes mature into macrophages. Once in the target organs, infected macrophages initiate viral replication, which induces an inflammatory cascade. Despite a vigorous immune response, the virus is not cleared and the animal will remain a carrier for life. Most animals remain asymptomatic, but a certain percentage of the animals develop the clinical disease in one or several target organs. Subclinical infection and disease progression may range from months to years. Both Visna/Maedi (VM) and Caprine Arthritis-Encephalitis (CAE) are ultimately fatal. Host genetic factors, infecting viral strain and management influence the occurrence, length and spectrum of affected target organs.
Figure 1. Small Ruminant Lentivirus (SRLV) timeline. SRLVs are transmitted via the respiratory or lactogenic route. Proviral DNA transcription and gene expression is suppressed until infected monocytes mature into macrophages. Once in the target organs, infected macrophages initiate viral replication, which induces an inflammatory cascade. Despite a vigorous immune response, the virus is not cleared and the animal will remain a carrier for life. Most animals remain asymptomatic, but a certain percentage of the animals develop the clinical disease in one or several target organs. Subclinical infection and disease progression may range from months to years. Both Visna/Maedi (VM) and Caprine Arthritis-Encephalitis (CAE) are ultimately fatal. Host genetic factors, infecting viral strain and management influence the occurrence, length and spectrum of affected target organs.
Viruses 05 02043 g001

1.2. Relevance and Control of SRLVs

SRLV infection and associated diseases are present in most sheep-rearing countries worldwide, negatively affecting production and animal welfare [1,17]. The economic impact depends on the breed, management system and type of production [6,10,11,23].
SRLV infections are difficult to control due to the ability of the virus to integrate into the host’s genome, induce persistent infections and elude neutralization. Vaccination attempts have occasionally caused increased viremia and more severe disease [1,6,18,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Currently, the control of VM and CAE relies on the control of transmission and test and cull schemes of infected animals and their progeny [30,31,32].
The development of disease-resistant breeding stock has been undertaken in other diseases due to lack of effectiveness of vaccines and development of resistance of pathogens to drugs and chemicals, which are becoming increasingly common [33]. However, the detection of SRLV-resistant animals remains problematic since DNA markers have to be identified and the interaction of SRLVs with the host and the pathogenesis of VM and CAE are not fully understood. It is therefore necessary to dissect the antigen and immune response if appropriate control methods are to be developed [34].

2. Host Genetic Resources

Since the domestication of sheep and goats human-mediated breeding has generated specialized animals suitable for a wide range of purposes, and hundreds of breeds exist worldwide which often have their own genetic signature [35,36].
There has been a huge increase in the research and application of disease genetics in small ruminants due to the growing knowledge of the influence of host genetics on disease control and the increase in available genetic and genomic tools. Apart from the scientific interest, there is a growing pressure on breeders to select animals that are healthier and more resistant both to infectious and metabolic diseases, which could be feasible with the available biotechnology tools and quickly augmenting knowledge on lentivirus molecular biology/pathogenesis [32,33].
However, in general the development of small ruminant genetic and genomic resources lags behind that of other domestic species such as cattle [37,38,39].
Different markers and strategies can be used to discover disease-associated loci, including microsatellites, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), copy number polymorphisms or variants, etc., which in addition can be complemented with expression assays [38,40]. Current high-throughput techniques allow the rapid genotyping of markers such as SNPs. (see Table 1 for limitations of association studies).

3. Host-Viral Pathogen Interaction

The interaction between retroviruses (RV) and their hosts is complex. RVs are obligate pathogens that require the host’s cellular machinery to complete their cycle. In response, the hosts have developed sophisticated mechanisms to fight viral infections, including innate and adaptive immune systems [50,51]. Observation of retroviral diseases in various species has shown that even in a population infected by a particular virus strain there are usually differences in the outcome of infection and disease of individual animals [52], and studies on host immune response, gene variability and expression could reveal why.
In humans, host genetic factors are important determinants that influence susceptibility to HIV infection and subsequent progression to AIDS, which has been thoroughly studied. Inter-individual variability in susceptibility to HIV-1 infection, transmission, disease progression, and response to antiviral therapy have been attributed to host determinants and variability in multiple genes [53,54].
Table 1. Limitations of genetic association studies in complex multifactorial diseases such as SRLV-induced pathologies. Factors leading to confounding that may be encountered as well as their consequences are shown (information compiled from [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49].
Table 1. Limitations of genetic association studies in complex multifactorial diseases such as SRLV-induced pathologies. Factors leading to confounding that may be encountered as well as their consequences are shown (information compiled from [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49].
Population stratificationOften present in livestock due to breeding practicesBias/PartialityCase samples are treated with preference
Sample sizeAffects power to detect associationMarker densityOften few markers are analyzed per gene
PhenotypeDescription must be accurateMarker frequencyFrequency of marker variants affect odds of detecting association
AgeOlder animals have been exposed for a longer timeSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Gene effectGenes involved have small/moderate effectsPowerDepends on sample size, marker frequency and gene effect
Presence of other diseasesMay facilitate SRLV pathogenesisGene interactionOften unaccounted for
SRLVsConfounding factorsFailure to account for them may lead to erroneous interpretations
Different virus strainsDifferent virulence and host/organ spectrum complicates research;Multiple correctionsNecessary yet may lead to reject real associations
Strain variability may affect detection of infected individualsConsistency/replicabilityResults must be replicated in different populations/
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORSCan results be replicated in a different population?
HusbandryProlonged and crowded housing enhances infection
SRLVs share many characteristics with HIV and indeed, in small ruminants, differences in susceptibility have been observed as well. However, a characteristic that differentiates SRLVs from other lentiviruses is that they do not cause immunodeficiency. In fact, one of the unresolved issues in SRLV infections is the fact that the virus is not cleared despite the host mounting an immune response. It is believed that SRLV proviral DNA escapes detection by the immune system by persisting in monocytes, thus allowing viral dissemination to target tissues. Furthermore, SRLVs may interfere with the function of effector cells implicated in the defense against the virus, such as macrophages and dendritic cells, altering the type of immune responses that are induced [5,11,17,55,56].
Other lentivirus species, although not as extensively studied as HIV, have added information on host genetic factors that may influence lentiviral pathogenesis including Equine Infectious Anemia Virus (EIAV), bovine immunodeficiency virus (BIV), Jembrana disease virus (JDV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV). Among these species, SRLVs, EIAV and BIV/JDB have a tropism for cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage, while the others also infect lymphocytes. In these non-primate lentivirus species differential susceptibility and associated genes may be found as well [1,7,57].

4. Evidence Pointing to the Existence of Host Genetics Controlling SRLV Pathogenesis

SRLV-induced pathogenesis is a complex process determined by multiple factors (See Table 1 for more details) such as host genetics, virus strain, management practices and presence of other diseases [10,17,32,58,59,60,61,62,63].
The above factors must be accounted for, but do not rule out genetic susceptibility. There is evidence that host genetics play an important role in determining susceptibility/resistance to SRLV infection and pathogenesis, but little work has been performed in small ruminants [64].
Research indicates that a breed (or genetic) predisposition may exist regarding infection susceptibility, provirus levels and lesion occurrence and progression, and thus the influence of the host’s genetics can be studied at different levels. The VMV-infected asymptomatic Karakul sheep imported to Iceland in the 1930s never developed signs of the disease but their importation resulted in a widespread dissemination of VM to the extremely susceptible native Icelandic sheep [34]. The research carried out by Icelandic scientists showed that some flocks/family lines had a slower disease progression. In addition, progression of Maedi was delayed in Icelandic x Border Leicester cross individuals [17,32,65]. Research carried out in other countries/breeds has provided further evidence of differential individual and breed susceptibility as well [55,66,67,68,69].

4.1. Infection

Resistance to SRLV infection despite repeated exposure could be interpreted as an innate resistance to infection [64,70]. Significant breed effects on seroprevalence have been observed in comingled flocks, with some sheep and goat breeds being more likely to seroconvert, indicating a possible host genetic restriction. For instance, a higher seroprevalence has been demonstrated in Texel, Border Leicester and Finnish sheep breeds as opposed to Ile de France, Rambouillet and Suffolk [10,23,32,68,71,72]. Saanen and Toggenburg goats are more likely to seroconvert whereas Bedouin Black could be resistant to infection under natural conditions [73,74].
In Latxa dairy-sheep, seroconversion was strongly associated with lifetime maternal VMV-serological status. Offspring of consistently seronegative ewes (>4 years old) were less likely to become infected, suggesting the existence of an inheritable factor of VMV-infection resistance [31].
Herrmann-Hoesing et al. [64] detected breed differences in seroprevalence and provirus levels (Rambouillet had lower values in both characters in comparison with Columbia and Polipay), which could imply mechanisms preventing infection and/or aiding in virus control after infection occurs. Interestingly, a correlation has been observed between virus load and the severity of lesions in both sheep and goats [17,21,26,34,75,76] suggesting that breeds/individuals able to control virus levels may be less likely to develop VM and CAE. After infection, there is an acute viremia followed by an immune response that restricts virus replication to low levels; although the infection is not cleared, virus replication is kept at a low level [77]. Some hosts may be better at regulating the extent of viral gene expression in macrophages and perhaps disease progression [1,64]. Latency appears to be controlled by an interaction of cellular and viral transcription factors that regulate viral RNA expression [32,78,79].

4.2. Clinical Disease

Concerning disease progression, it does not progress uniformly in all individuals and rapid progressors have been observed [19,56]. Furthermore, the extent of SRLV-induced lesions and the spectrum of affected organs may depend on the host’s genetics as well as the infecting virus strain [10,80]. Certain breeds seem to be more likely to develop the clinical signs, while others remain in a subclinical infection stage. Coarse wool type sheep may be more susceptible than fine wool type sheep [66]. Border Leicester sheep could be more likely than Columbia to develop SRLV-specific lesions [66,67]. Chios and Awassi sheep seem to be highly susceptible to infection but resistant to the development of the clinical disease [32,74,81]. Interestingly, Assaf sheep, a stabilized Awassi x East Friesian cross, show high SRLV seroprevalence and VM clinical disease occurrence including the neurological manifestation [82].
Further evidence is provided by experiments carried out with isogenic twin lambs, which showed that the host’s genetics influence the extent and severity of SRLV-induced pulmonary lesions [70].

5. Host Genetic Factors Involved in SRLV-Induced Pathogenesis

SRLV pathogenesis is difficult to analyze due to the strains, different host species and breeds, differential disease progression and affected organ spectrums. It seems that the relationship between small ruminants and SRLVs is complex and that the pathogenesis is likely induced by a number of genes with small or moderate effects [7,56].
The cellular receptor(s) for SRLVs has not been conclusively identified and therefore that information cannot be exploited yet. Most likely it is a common cell membrane molecule as SRLVs can enter other cells apart from target cells, and thus the receptor does not dictate cell tropism [17,34,83,84]. However, classical VMV and CAEV strains appear to use different receptors [7,85,86]. The mannose receptor (MR) is a putative receptor for SRLVs. Crespo et al. [87] characterized the ovine MR nucleotide and protein sequence, and its role in VMV infection is currently being studied.
Both innate and adaptive (humoral and cellular) immune responses are induced by SRLVs and various works have identified immune response loci that could influence resistance/susceptibility to SRLV infection and disease, providing evidence that genetic factors might modulate the outcome. Below are some host genetic factors that have been involved in SRLV infection and disease.

5.1. Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC)

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region, a polymorphic multi-gene complex located on chromosome 20 in sheep and chromosome 23 in goats [88,89], has been implicated in SRLV infection and SRLV-induced disease. The MHC Class I and II genes encode receptor glycoproteins that bind and present antigenic peptides to T cells initiating the immune response. The MHC is one of the few polymorphic systems for which it has been possible to establish a functional significance for the observed genetic variation [90]. Its polymorphism and association with infectious disease has been intensely studied in a myriad of diseases with viral etiology, although such studies are scarce in small ruminants.
In the ovine species, VMV infection increases the expression level of the MHC Class II in the lung, the CNS and the synovium [76,91,92,93,94]. In addition, Class I and II polymorphic gene variants have been linked to SRLV provirus levels and disease progression (See Table 2 for more details; [64,95,96]).
Table 2. Major histocompatability complex (MHC) genes/variants associated with VM or CAE pathogenesis.
Table 2. Major histocompatability complex (MHC) genes/variants associated with VM or CAE pathogenesis.
RegionVariantTyping method/markerSpecies/Breed(s) studiedReference
Class Iallele CLA Be7AlloantiseraGoat/Saanen[97]
Allele OMHC1* 205MicrosatelliteSheep/Latxa[96]
Class IIAlleles DRB1*0403- and DRB1*07012 and various amino acid positionsCloning and direct sequencingSheep/Rambouillet, Polipay & Columbia[64]
DRB1*0325PCR-Sequence-Based TypingSheep/Latxa[95]
Allele DRB2* 275MicrosatelliteSheep/Latxa[96]
The highly polymorphic nature of many loci in the MHC, among which the DR beta 1 (DRB1) gene is a clear example (over 100 alleles identified to date in sheep [64]), makes it difficult to investigate its involvement in SRLV pathogenesis [90]. Genotyping methods with enough resolution are necessary to type MHC loci, and sample sizes are often inadequate to test rare variants. The effect of different MHC alleles remains to be elucidated but it is possible that polymorphisms, depending on the location, may alter the ability of MHC molecules to bind and present antigens, affect the interaction with T cells or elicit differential immune responses [98,99].

5.2. Antibody and T Cell Response

SRLV infection induces antibody response, which has been well studied due to its use in SRLV serologic diagnostics [100]. However, neutralizing antibodies are slow to be induced or have low affinity and relatively low titers. A small amount of free viruses combined with the ability to spread from cell to cell means that propagation and spread cannot be fully stopped by antibodies [7,101].
Nevertheless, some antibody responses may be better at controlling SRLV. Data indicates that the antibody response is skewed in SRLV-infected sheep and goats. Only immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) subtype responses are detected in sheep whilst in goats IgG1 dominates the humoral response [19,102,103,104,105].
Concerning T cells, both T cell proliferative and cytotoxic responses are induced after SRLV infection [7]. However, the CD4+/CD8+ cell ratio is decreased in the bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF), synovial fluid and cerebrospinal fluid of diseased animals because of higher levels of CD8+ cells, which could be correlated with the severity of lung lesions [93,94,106,107,108]. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) appear to be important effector cells, for they may inhibit viral replication but also contribute to lesions through cytokine production or cytotoxicity [34,76,109,110].
In ruminants, IgG1 induces a type-2 T helper cell (Th2) response, while production of IgG2 is indicative of a Th1 response [111]. Interestingly, goats with a Th2-biased CD4+ T cell response are known to develop arthritis, but those with a mixed IgG1 and IgG2 response remain without clinical signs, suggesting that anti-SRLV IgG2 antibodies protect against disease induction [7,19,104,112]. In addition, CD80 levels, which favor Th1 cell differentiation, were low in clinically affected sheep compared with asymptomatic and seronegative controls [80].

5.3. Cytokines and Receptors

Cytokines are important signaling proteins that act as important mediators of the immune system, which initiate and modulate many processes. Studies in diverse species have revealed that cytokine and cytokine receptor expression levels, polymorphisms and profiles in the host can affect the pathogenesis of virus-induced diseases.
Cytokines seem to have an important role in SRLV induced pathogenesis, including the modulation of the ongoing immune activation in target organ lesions with some cytokines favoring the appearance of lesions. Cytokines induce the recruitment and differentiation of monocytes to macrophages as well, favoring additional infection by attracting target cells and thus creating a vicious circle. Indeed, several cytokines have been found up or down regulated (See Table 3) in VM and CAE, although more data on cytokines are necessary [7,10,19,20,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120].
Although most research has focused on expression, a few works have explored the influence of polymorphisms. Cytokine polymorphisms are known to affect cytokine gene transcription [121,122], or they may affect cytokine function thus influencing the outcome of infection and disease. Chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is an example of how polymorphisms could affect SRLV pathogenesis. CCR5 participates in leukocyte recruitment against different pathogens, including ovine lentiviruses. A deletion in this locus causes an almost four-fold reduction in transcription in animals carrying the deletion allele, as well as showing association with a decreased provirus-burden. Considering that monocytes/macrophages are the main target cells of VMV, it has been suggested that a reduced chemotactic ability of CCR5 could result in reduced influx of such cells to the site of infection, which could also slow the rate of cellular infection [120,121,123].
Alteration of cytokine profile has been suggested in both sheep, and goats and it is suspected that SRLVs induce a switch to a Type 2 (Th2 type) cytokine response. Evidence backing this is the up regulation of Type 2 cytokines such as anti-inflammatory cytokines IL4 and IL10 [20,80,102,105].

5.4. Innate Immunity and Restriction Factors

The role of innate immunity is gaining interest in the field of lentiviral infections [7]. Genes of the innate immune response are being characterized in small ruminants and their association with SRLV pathogenesis is being tested.
Since the innate immunity senses highly conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) via a number of receptors and signaling molecules, polymorphisms in innate immune genes are very likely to affect the host susceptibility to infections. Indeed, such an effect has been observed in a number of species and diseases, and thus genes such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and their variation have been suggested to be good candidate prospects in various diseases affecting domestic livestock [124,125].
TLRs are a family of transmembrane signaling molecules that trigger both the innate and the adaptive immune response mechanisms in response to PAMPs, including viral components [50,126].
Table 3. Cytokine and cytokine receptor genes implicated in SRLV pathogenesis in sheep and goats.
Table 3. Cytokine and cytokine receptor genes implicated in SRLV pathogenesis in sheep and goats.
Gene symbolGeneSpeciesMethodsAnalyzed materialParameter analysedReferences
IL1βInterleukin-1betaSheepSemiquantitative RT-PCR 1LungClinical disease[114]
IL2/IL2RInterleukin-2/Interleukin-2 receptorSheepSemiquantitative RT-PCR, qPCR 2Lung, PBMCs 3, lymph node leukocytesInfection, Clinical disease[114,118,120]
GoatIn situ hybridizationJointsInfection, Clinical disease[113]
IL4Interleukin-4SheepSemiquantitative RT-PCRLungClinical disease[114]
GoatSemiquantitative RT-PCRPBMCsClinical disease[20]
IL6Interleukin-6SheepRT-PCRAlveolar macrophagesInfection, Clinical disease[116]
IL8Interleukin-8SheepRT-qPCR, in situ hybridization, Northern blot, Semiquantitative RT-PCRBALF, alveolar macrophages,Infection, Clinical disease[115,117,119]
GoatIn situ hybridizationMacrophagesInfection[20]
IL10Interleukin-10SheepSemiquantitative RT-PCRLung, alveolar macrophagesInfection, Clinical disease[114,116]
IFNyInterferon-gammaSheepSemiquantitative RT-PCRLungClinical disease[114]
GoatSemiquantitative RT-PCR, in situ hybridizationPBMCs, jointsClinical disease[19,113]
TNFαTumor Necrosis factor-alphaSheepqPCRLung, udderClinical disease[120]
TGF-β1Tumor growth factor beta-1SheepSemiquantitative RT-PCRAlveolar macrophagesInfection, Clinical disease[116]
GoatIn situ hybridizationMacrophagesInfection[20]
MCP-1Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1GoatIn situ hybridizationMacrophages, jointsInfection ,Clinical disease[20,113]
GM-CSFGranulocyte macrophage stimulating factorSheepSemiquantitative RT-PCRLung, alveolar macrophagesInfection, Clinical disease[114,116]
GoatIn situ hybridizationMacrophagesInfection[20]
CCR5Chemokine (C-C motif) Receptor 5SheepCloning & sequencing, qPCRPBMCs, lungInfection, Clinical disease[120,121]
1 RT-PCR: Reverse Transcriptase PCR; 2 qPCR: Quantitative PCR; 3 PBMCs: Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.
Mikula et al. [127] suggested that individual susceptibility existed in the Tsigai breed that may be defined by the presence of SNPs in TLR7 and TLR8, which sense double stranded viral RNA. Mutations at the TLR7 locus may affect PAMP binding onto the TLR molecule [127,128]. In addition, these two genes have recently been found to be up regulated in diseased sheep [120]. Furthermore, different Toll-like receptors may activate different signaling pathways, with different biological consequences, and thus merit additional research [50].
In response to retroviruses and other transposable elements, which invade the host’s genome, hosts have developed intracellular defenses known as restriction factors. These proteins block the viral cycle using different strategies, such as directly attacking viral structures or editing viral genetic material during reverse transcription [129,130]. In recent years there has been a notable increase in this research area.
Ovine TRIM5α seems to be able to restrict VMV DNA synthesis [131]. This intracellular factor restricts retroviral replication by interacting with the capsid and preventing uncoating. A recent study has suggested an association between a tripartite motif protein 5 alpha (TRIM5α) polymorphism that inactivates antiviral activity and accelerates AIDS disease progression [56,132]. Whether such an effect is also present in sheep and goats will still have to be investigated.
Research is needed concerning additional innate immunity genes. Apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme (APOBEC3) proteins, which act against a wide variety of retroviruses including HIV, have been studied in sheep and they could be good candidates for SRLVs [7,130,133,134,135]. A human APOBEC3G variant has been associated with rapid HIV-1 disease progression [50].
Recently, allele and haplotype variants of the transmembrane protein gene 154 (TMEM154) locus have been associated with SRLV infection, which has been proposed as a locus that could be used for genetic marker-based selection [23]. Sheep with the ancestral variant haplotypes of this gene had an increased risk of becoming infected compared with individuals with mutant forms. However, the function of TMEM14 has not been established yet.

6. Conclusions

So far, a number of genes implicated in SRLV infection and disease have been identified, but more research is necessary to understand the host-SRLV interaction. A better understanding of loci involved in SRLV infection and pathology and their polymorphism could lead to the identification and selective breeding of naturally resistant animals, thus avoiding culling and reducing viral load and disease development [23,131]. There are encouraging examples where breeding programs have successfully selected animals with enhanced resistance, for example nematodes, mastitis, foot rot and scrapie in sheep; nowadays genetic tools are being employed to aid this selection, as seen in scrapie. However, a critical question will be if there is also a correlation between disease resistance and production traits. Breeding for resistance as a sole objective may not be desirable due to the potential negative impact it may have on other desirable production traits [33,90]. In addition, the molecular characterization of host genetic factors involved in SRLV infection and disease could detect new targets, which could uncover new host pathways leading to opportunities to develop antiviral therapies.


We are grateful to the editorial board of this journal for the opportunity to write this review. The research of Genomics and Health group is funded by the Basque Government Industry Dpt. (grant SA-10/00120 to B.M.J.) and UPV/EHU (grants GIU07/62 and GIU10/22 to B.M.J. and UFI 11/20). We are also grateful to the four anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and constructive criticism.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References and Notes

  1. Patel, J.R.; Heldens, J.G.M.; Bakonyi, T.; Rusvai, M. Important mammalian veterinary viral immunodiseases and their control. Vaccine 2012, 30, 1767–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Leroux, C.; Cruz, J.C.M.; Mornex, J.F. SRLVs: A genetic continuum of lentiviral species in sheep and goats with cumulative evidence of cross species transmission. Curr. HIV Res. 2010, 8, 94–100. [Google Scholar]
  3. Leroux, C.; Vuillermoz, S.; Mornex, J.F.; Greenland, T. Genomic heterogeneity in the pol region of ovine lentiviruses obtained from bronchoalveolar cells of infected sheep from France. J. Gen. Virol. 1995, 76, 1533–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gorrell, M.D.; Brandon, M.R.; Sheffer, D.; Adams, R.J.; Narayan, O. Ovine lentivirus is macrophagetropic and does not replicate productively in T lymphocytes. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 2679–2688. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ryan, S.; Tiley, L.; McConnell, I.; Blacklaws, B. Infection of dendritic cells by the Maedi-Visna lentivirus. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 10096–10103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Christodoulopoulos, G. Maedi-Visna: Clinical review and short reference on the disease status in Mediterranean countries. Small Rumin. Res. 2006, 62, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Blacklaws, B.A. Small ruminant lentiviruses: Immunopathogenesis of Visna-Maedi and caprine arthritis and encephalitis virus. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect.Dis. 2012, 35, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rowe, J.D.; East, N.E. Risk factors for transmission and methods for control of caprine arthritis-encephalitis virus infection. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 1997, 13, 35–53. [Google Scholar]
  9. Blacklaws, B.A.; Berriatúa, E.; Torsteinsdottir, S.; Watt, N.J.; De Andrés, D.; Klein, D.; Harkiss, G.D. Transmission of small ruminant lentiviruses. Vet. Microbiol. 2004, 101, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pépin, M.; Vitu, C.; Russo, P.; Mornex, J.F.; Peterhans, E. Maedi-Visna Virus infection in sheep: A review. Vet. Res. 1998, 29, 1–53. [Google Scholar]
  11. Peterhans, E.; Greenland, T.; Badiola, J.; Harkiss, G.; Bertoni, G.; Amorena, B.; Eliaszewicz, M.; Juste, R.A.; Krassnig, R.; Lafont, J.P.; et al. Routes of transmission and consequences of small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLVs) infection and eradication schemes. Vet. Res. 2004, 35, 257–274. [Google Scholar]
  12. Leginagoikoa, I.; Daltabuit-Test, M.; Alvarez, V.; Arranz, J.; Juste, R.A.; Amorena, B.; de Andrés, D.; Luján, L.L.; Badiola, J.J.; Berriatúa, E. Horizontal Maedi-Visna Virus (MVV) infection in adult dairy-sheep raised under varying MVV-infection pressures investigated by ELISA and PCR. Res. Vet. Sci. 2006, 80, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gufler, H.; Gasteiner, J.; Lombardo, D.; Stifter, E.; Krassnig, R. Serological study of small ruminant lentivirus in goats in Italy. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 73, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Herrmann-Hoesing, L.M.; Palmer, G.G.H.; Knowles, D.P.D. Evidence of proviral clearance following postpartum transmission of an ovine lentivirus. Virology 2007, 362, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Broughton-neiswanger, L.E.; White, S.N.; Knowles, D.P.; Mousel, M.R.; Lewis, G.S.; Herndon, D.R.; Herrmann-Hoesing, L.M. Non-maternal transmission is the major mode of ovine lentivirus transmission in a ewe flock: A molecular epidemiology study. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2010, 10, 998–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Álvarez, V.; Arranz, J.; Daltabuit-Test, M.; Leginagoikoa, I.; Juste, R.A.; Amorena, B.; de Andrés, D.; Luján, L.L.; Badiola, J.J.; Berriatúa, E. Relative contribution of colostrum from Maedi-Visna Virus (MVV) infected ewes to MVV-seroprevalence in lambs. Res. Vet. Sci. 2005, 78, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thormar, H. Maedi-Visna Virus and its relationship to human immunodeficiency virus. AIDS Rev. 2005, 7, 233–245. [Google Scholar]
  18. Leroux, C.; Mornex, J.F. Retroviral infections in sheep and the associated diseases. Small Rumin. Res. 2008, 76, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cheevers, W.P.; Beyer, J.C.; Knowles, D.P. Type 1 and type 2 cytokine gene expression by viral gp135 surface protein-activated T lymphocytes in caprine arthritis-encephalitis lentivirus infection. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 6259–6263. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lechner, F.; Machado, J.; Bertoni, G.; Seow, H.F.; Dobbelaere, D.A.E.; Peterhans, E. Caprine arthritis encephalitis virus dysregulates the expression of cytokines in macrophages. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 7488–7497. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ravazzolo, A.P.; Nenci, C.; Vogt, H.R.; Waldvogel, A.; Obexer-Ruff, G.; Peterhans, E.; Bertoni, G. Viral load, organ distribution, histopathological lesions, and cytokine mRNA expression in goats infected with a molecular clone of the caprine arthritis encephalitis virus. Virology 2006, 350, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Benavides, J.; García-Pariente, C.; Fuertes, M.; Ferreras, M.C.; García-Marín, J.F.; Juste, R.A. Maedi-Visna: The meningoencephalitis in naturally occurring cases. J. Comp. Pathol. 2009, 141, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Heaton, M.P.M.; Clawson, M.L.M.; Chitko-Mckown, C.G.; Leymaster, K.A.; Smith, T.P.L.; Harhay, G.P.; White, S.N.; Herrmann-Hoesing, L.M.; Mousel, M.R.; Lewis, G.S.; et al. Reduced lentivirus susceptibility in sheep with TMEM154 mutations. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cheevers, W.P.; Ho, I.; Beyer, J.C. Immune response to caprine arthritis/encephalitis virus surface protein induced by coimmunization with recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing the caprine arthritis/encephalitis virus envelope gene and caprine interleukin-12. Vaccine 2000, 18, 2494–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Torsteinsdóttir, S.; Carlsdóttir, H.M.; Svansson, V.; Matthíasdóttir, S.; Pétursson, G. Vaccination of sheep with Maedi-Visna Virus gag gene and protein, beneficial or harmful? Vaccine 2007, 25, 6713–6720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brodie, S.J.; Marcom, K.A.; Pearson, L.D.; Anderson, B.C.; de la Concha-Bermejillo, A.; Ellis, J.A.; DeMartini, J.C. Effects of virus load in the pathogenesis of lentivirus-induced lymphoid interstitial pneumonia. J. Infect. Dis. 1992, 166, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pétursson, G.; Matthíasdóttir, S.; Svansson, V.; Andrésdóttir, V.; Georgsson, G.; Martin, A.H.; Agnarsdóttir, G.; Gísladóttir, E.; Arnadóttir, S.; Högnadóttir, S.; et al. Mucosal vaccination with an attenuated Maedi-Visna Virus clone. Vaccine 2005, 23, 3223–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheevers, W.P.; Snekvik, K.R.; Trujillo, J.D.; Kumpula-McWhirter, N.M.; Pretty On Top, K.J.; Knowles, D.P. Prime-boost vaccination with plasmid DNA encoding caprine-arthritis encephalitis lentivirus env and viral SU suppresses challenge virus and development of arthritis. Virology 2003, 306, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nenci, C.; Zahno, M.L.; Vogt, H.R.; Obexer-Ruff, G.; Doherr, M.G.; Zanoni, R.; Bertoni, G. Vaccination with a T-cell-priming Gag peptide of caprine arthritis encephalitis virus enhances virus replication transiently in vivo. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88, 1589–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Blacklaws, B.; Bird, P.; McConnell, I. Early events in infection of lymphoid tissue by a lentivirus, Maedi-Visna. Trends Microbiol. 1995, 3, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Berriatúa, E.; Álvarez, V.; Extramiana, B.; González, L.; Daltabuit, M.; Juste, R. Transmission and control implications of seroconversion to Maedi-Visna Virus in Basque dairy-sheep flocks. Prev. Vet. Med. 2003, 60, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. DeMartini, J.; de la Concha-Bermejillo, A.; Carlson, J.; Bowen, R. Diseases caused by Maedi-Visna and other ovine lentiviruses. In Breeding for Disease Resistance in Farm Animals; Axford, R.F.E., Bishop, S.C., Nicholas, F.W., Owen, J.B., Eds.; CAB International: Oxon, UK, 2000; pp. 301–324. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bishop, S.; Morris, C. Genetics of disease resistance in sheep and goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 70, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Torsteinsdottir, S.; Andresdottir, V.; Arnarson, H.; Petursson, G. Immune response to Maedi-Visna Virus. Front Biosci. 2007, 12, 1532–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lawson-Handley, L.; Byrne, K.; Santucci, F.; Townsend, S.; Taylor, M.; Bruford, M.W.; Hewitt, G.M. Genetic structure of European sheep breeds. Heredity 2007, 99, 620–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kijas, J.W.; Townley, D.; Dalrymple, B.P.; Heaton, M.P.; Maddox, J.F.; Wilson, P.; Ingersoll, R.G.; Mcculloch, R.; Mcwilliam, S.; Tang, D.; et al. A Genome wide survey of SNP variation reveals the genetic structure of sheep breeds. PLoS One 2009, 4, e4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. The International Sheep Genomics Consortium; Archibald, A.; Cockett, N.; Dalrymple, B.P.; Faraut, T.; Kijas, J.W.; Maddox, J.F.; Mcewan, J.C.; Oddy, V.H.; Raadsma, H.W.; et al. The sheep genome reference sequence: A work in progress. Anim. Genet. 2010, 2009, 449–453. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ibeagha-Awemu, E.M.; Kgwatalala, E.M.I.P.; Ibeagha, A.E.; Zhao, X. A critical analysis of disease-associated DNA polymorphisms in the genes of cattle, goat, sheep, and pig. Mamm. Genome 2008, 19, 226–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Becker, D.; Tetens, J.; Brunner, A.; Bürstel, D.; Ganter, M.; Kijas, J.; International Sheep Genomics Consortium; Drögemüller, C. Microphthalmia in Texel sheep is associated with a missense mutation in the paired-like homeodomain 3 (PITX3) gene. PLoS One 2010, 5, e8689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. Purdie, A.C.; Plain, K.M.; Begg, D.J.; de Silva, K.; Whittington, R.J.; de Silva, K. Candidate gene and genome-wide association studies of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in cattle and sheep: A review. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011, 34, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Silverman, E.K.; Palmer, L.J. Case-control association studies for the genetics of complex respiratory diseases. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2000, 22, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Daly, A.K.; Day, C.P. Candidate gene case-control association studies: Advantages and potential pitfalls. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2001, 52, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Campbell, H.; Rudan, I. Interpretation of genetic association studies in complex disease. Pharmacogenomics J. 2002, 2, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hirschhorn, J.N.; Lohmueller, K.; Byrne, E.; Hirschhorn, K. A comprehensive review of genetic association studies. Genet. Med. 2002, 4, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cardon, L.R.; Palmer, L.J. Population stratification and spurious allelic association. Lancet 2003, 361, 598–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Colhoun, H.M.; McKeigue, P.M.; Smith, G.D. Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes. Lancet 2003, 361, 865–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cordell, H.J.; Clayton, D.G. Genetic association studies. Lancet 2005, 366, 1121–1131. [Google Scholar]
  48. Balding, D.J. A tutorial on statistical methods for population association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Narum, S.R. Beyond bonferroni: Less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conserv. Genet. 2006, 7, 783–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bochud, P.Y.; Bochud, M.; Telenti, A.; Calandra, T. Innate immunogenetics: A tool for exploring new frontiers of host defence. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2007, 7, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abbas, A.K.; Lichtman, A.H. Basic Immunology, Updated Edition; Saunders Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  52. Maclachlan, N.; Dubovi, E.J. Fenner’s Veterinary Virology, 4th ed.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  53. Miyazawa, M.; Tsuji-kawahara, S.; Kanari, Y. Host genetic factors that control immune responses to retrovirus infections. Vaccine 2010, 26, 2981–2996. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kaur, G.; Mehra, N. Genetic determinants of HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS: Immune response genes. Tissue Antigens 2009, 74, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Brodie, S. Current concepts in the epizootiology, diagnosis, and economic importance of ovine progressive pneumonia in North America: A review. Small Rumin. Res. 1998, 27, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Blacklaws, B.A.; Harkiss, G.D. Small ruminant lentiviruses and human immunodeficiency virus: Cousins that take a long view. Curr. HIV Res. 2010, 8, 26–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stump, D.S.; VandeWoude, S. Animal models for HIV AIDS: A comparative review. Comp. Med. 2007, 57, 33–43. [Google Scholar]
  58. Angelopoulou, K.; Brellou, G.D.; Vlemmas, I.; Greenland, T. A novel deletion in the LTR region of a Greek small ruminant lentivirus may be associated with low pathogenicity. Virus Res. 2006, 118, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Oskarsson, T.; Hreggvidsdóttir, H.S.; Agnarsdóttir, G.; Matthíasdóttir, S.; Ogmundsdóttir, M.H.; Jónsson, S.R.; Georgsson, G.; Ingvarsson, S.; Andrésson, O.S.; Andrésdóttir, V. Duplicated sequence motif in the long terminal repeat of Maedi-Visna Virus extends cell tropism and is associated. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 4052–4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Leginagoikoa, I.; Minguijón, E.; Juste, R.A.; Barandika, J.; Amorena, B.; de Andrés, D.; Badiola, J.J.; Luján, L.; Berriatua, E.; de Andrés, D. Effects of housing on the incidence of Visna/Maedi virus infection in sheep flocks. Res. Vet. Sci. 2010, 88, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. González, L.; Juste, R.A.; Cuervo, L.A.; Idigoras, I.; Saez de Ocariz, C. Pathological and epidemiological aspects of the coexis- tence of Maedi-Visna and sheep pulmonary adenomatosis. Res. Vet. Sci. 1993, 54, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Andrésdóttir, V.; Tang, X.; Agnarsdóttir, G.; Andrésson, O.S.; Georgsson, G.; Skraban, R.; Torsteinsdóttir, S.; Rafnar, B.; Benediktsdóttir, E.; Matthíasdóttir, S.; Arnadóttir, S.; et al. Biological and genetic differences between lung- and brain-derived isolates of Maedi-Visna Virus. Virus Genes 1998, 16, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Reina, R.; Grego, E.; Bertolotti, L.; de Meneghi, D.; Rosati, S. Genome analysis of small-ruminant lentivirus genotype E: A caprine lentivirus with natural deletions of the dUTPase subunit, vpr-like accessory gene, and 70-base-pair repeat of the U3 region. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 1152–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Herrmann-Hoesing, L.M.; White, S.N.; Mousel, M.R.; Lewis, G.S.; Knowles, D.P. Ovine progressive pneumonia provirus levels associate with breed and Ovar-DRB1. Immunogenetics 2008, 60, 749–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Palsson, P. Maedi and visna in sheep. In Slow Virus Diseases of Animals and Man; Kimberlin, R.H., Ed.; North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 1976; pp. 17–43. [Google Scholar]
  66. Straub, O.C. Maedi-Visna Virus infection in sheep. History and present knowledge. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2004, 27, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cutlip, R.C.; Lehmkuhl, H.D.; Brogden, K.A.; Sacks, J.M. Breed susceptibility to ovine progressive pneumonia (Maedi/Visna) virus. Vet. Microbiol. 1986, 12, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Houwers, D.J.; VIsscher, A.H.; Defise, P.R. Importance of ewe/lamb relationship and breed in the epidemiology of Maedi-Visna VIRUS infections. Res. Vet. Sci. 1989, 46, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  69. Zink, M.C.; Johnson, L.K. Pathobiology of lentivirus infections of sheep and goats. Virus Res. 1994, 32, 139–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. De la Concha-Bermejillo, A.; Brodie, S.J.; Magnus-Corral, S.; Bowen, R.A.; DeMartini, J.C. Pathologic and serologic responses of isogeneic twin lambs to phenotypically disinct lentiviruses. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol. 1995, 8, 116–123. [Google Scholar]
  71. Gates, N.L.; Winward, L.D.; Gorham, J.R.; Shen, D.T. Serologic survey of prevalence of ovine progressive pneumonia in Idaho range sheep. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1978, 173, 1575–1577. [Google Scholar]
  72. Keen, J.E.; Hungerford, L.L.; Wittum, T.E.; Kwang, J.; Littledike, E.T. Risk factors for seroprevalenceof ovine lentivirus in breeding ewe flocks in Nebraska, USA. Prev. Vet. Med. 1997, 30, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rowe, J.D.; East, N.E.; Franti, C.E.; Thurmond, M.C.; Pedersen, N.C.; Theilen, G.H. Risk factors associated with the incidence of seroconversion to caprine arthritis-encephalitis virus in goats on California dairies. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1992, 53, 2396–2403. [Google Scholar]
  74. Perk, K. Characteristics of ovine and caprine lentivirus infections. Leukemia 1995, 9, 98–100. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, Z.; Watt, N.J.; Hopkins, J.; Harkiss, G.; Woodall, C.J. Quantitative analysis of Maedi-Visna Virus DNA load in peripheral blood monocytes and alveolar macrophages. J. Virol. Methods 2000, 86, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Singh, I.; McConnell, I.; Blacklaws, B. Immune response to individual Maedi-Visna Virus gag antigens. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 912–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fluri, A.; Nenci, C.; Zahno, M.-L.; Vogt, H.; Charan, S.; Busato, A.; Pancino, G.; Peterhans, E.; Obexer-Ruff, G.; Bertoni, G. The MHC-haplotype influences primary, but not memory, immune responses to an immunodominant peptide containing T- and B-cell epitopes of the caprine arthritis encephalitis virus Gag protein. Vaccine 2006, 24, 597–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Clements, J.E.; Zink, M.C. Molecular biology and pathogenesis of animal lentivirus infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 9, 100–117. [Google Scholar]
  79. Staskus, K.A.; Couch, L.; Bitterman, P.; Retzel, E.F.; Zupancic, M.; List, J.; Haase, A.T. In situ amplification of visna virus DNA in tissue sections reveals a reservoir of latently infected cells. Microb. Pathog. 1991, 11, 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  80. Reina, R.; Glaria, I.; Benavides, J.; de Andrés, X.; Crespo, H.; Solano, C.; Pérez, V.; Luján, L.; Pérez, M.M.; Pérez de la Lastra, J.M.; et al. Association of CD80 and CD86 expression levels with disease status of Visna/Maedi virus infected sheep. Viral Immunol. 2007, 20, 609–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gudnadóttir, M.; Demosthenous, A.; Hadjisavvas, T. Vaccination delays Maedi-Visna lentivirus infection in a naturally-infected sheep flock. BMC Vet. Res. 2013, 9, e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Benavides, J.; García-Pariente, C.; Ferreras, M.C.; Fuertes, M.; García-Marín, J.F.; Pérez, V. Diagnosis of clinical cases of the nervous form of Maedi-Visna in 4- and 6-month-old lambs. Vet. J. 2007, 174, 255–258. [Google Scholar]
  83. Brodie, S.J.; Pearson, L.D.; Zink, M.C.; Bickle, H.M.; Anderson, B.C.; Marcom, K.A.; Demartinit, J.C.; DeMartini, J.C. Ovine lentivirus expression and disease. Virus replication, but not entry, is restricted to macrophages of specific tissues. Am. J. Pathol. 1995, 146, 250–263. [Google Scholar]
  84. Agnarsdóttir, G.; Thorsteinsdóttir, H.; Oskarsson, T.; Matthíasdóttir, S.; Haflidadóttir, B.S.; Andrésson, O.S.; Andrésdóttir, V. The long terminal repeat is a determinant of cell tropism of Maedi-Visna Virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2000, 81, 1901–1905. [Google Scholar]
  85. Hötzel, I.; Cheevers, W.P. A maedi-visna virus strain K1514 receptor gene is located in sheep chromosome 3p and the syntenic region of human chromosome 2. J. Gen. Virol. 2002, 83, 1759–1764. [Google Scholar]
  86. Hötzel, I.; Cheevers, W.P. Host range of small-ruminant lentivirus cytopathic variants determined with a selectable caprine arthritis-encephalitis virus pseudotype system. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 7384–7391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Crespo, H.; Jauregui, P.; Glaria, I.; José, I.S.; Polledo, L.; García-Marín, J.F.; Luján, L.; de Andrés, D.; Amorena, B.; Reina, R. Mannose receptor may be involved in small ruminant lentivirus pathogenesis. Vet. Res. 2012, 43, e43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  88. Amills, M.; Ramiya, V.; Norimine, J.; Lewin, H.A. The major histocompatibility complex of ruminants. Rev. Sci. Tech. 1998, 17, 108–120. [Google Scholar]
  89. Dukkipati, V.S.R.; Blair, H.T.; Garrick, D.J.; Murray, A. “Ovar-Mhc”—Ovine major histocompatibility complex: Structure and gene polymorphisms. Genet. Mol. Res. 2006, 5, 581–608. [Google Scholar]
  90. Sayers, G.; Sweeney, T. Gastrointestinal nematode infection in sheep—A review of the alternatives to anthelmintics in parasite control. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2005, 6, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lee, W.C.; Bird, P.; McConnell, I.; Watt, N.J.; Blacklaws, B. The phenotype and phagocytic activity of macrophages during Maedi-Visna Virus infection. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996, 51, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bergsteinsdóttir, K.; Arnadóttir, S.; Torsteinsdóttir, S.; Agnarsdóttir, G.; Andrésdóttir, V.; Péttursson, G.; Georgsson, G. Constitutive and visna virus induced expression of class I and II major histocompatibility complex antigens in the central nervous system of sheep and their role in the pathogenesis of visna lesions. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1998, 24, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Harkiss, G.D.; Watt, N.J.; King, T.J.; Williams, J.; Hopkins, J. Retroviral arthritis: Phenotypic analysis of cells in the synovial fluid of sheep with inflammatory synovitis associated with visna virus infection. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1991, 60, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Anderson, A.A.; Harkiss, G.D.; Watt, N.J. Quantitative analysis of immunohistological changes in the synovial membrane of sheep infected with Maedi-Visna Virus. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1994, 72, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Larruskain, A.; Minguijón, E.; García-etxebarria, K.; Moreno, B.; Arostegui, I.; Juste, R.A; Jugo, B.M. MHC class II DRB1 gene polymorphism in the pathogenesis of Maedi-Visna and pulmonary adenocarcinoma viral diseases in sheep. Immunogenetics 2010, 62, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Larruskain, A.; Minguijón, E.; Arostegui, I.; Moreno, B.; Juste, R.A.; Jugo, B.M. Microsatellites in immune-relevant regions and their associations with Maedi-Visna and ovine pulmonary adenocarcinoma viral diseases. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2012, 145, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ruff, G.; Regli, J.G.; Lazary, S. Occurrence of caprine leucocyte class I and II antigens in Saanen goats affected by caprine arthritis (CAE). Eur. J. Immunogenet. 1993, 20, 285–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Batalia, M.A.; Collins, E.J.; Carolina, N. Peptide binding by class I and class II MHC molecules. Biopolymers 1997, 43, 281–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Konnai, S.; Takeshima, S.; Tajima, S.; Yin, S.A.; Okada, K.; Onuma, M.; Aida, Y. The influence of ovine MHC class II DRB1 alleles on immune response in bovine leukemia virus infection. Microbiol. Immunol. 2003, 47, 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  100. De Andrés, D.; Klein, D.; Watt, N.J.; Berriatua, E.; Torsteinsdottir, S.; Blacklaws, B.A.; Harkiss, G.D. Diagnostic tests for small ruminant lentiviruses. Vet. Microbiol. 2005, 107, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Singh, D.K.; Chebloune, Y.; Mselli-Lakhal, L.; Karr, B.M.; Narayan, O. Ovine lentivirus-infected macrophages mediate productive infection in cell types that are not susceptible to infection with cell-free virus. J. Gen. Virol. 1999, 80, 1437–1444. [Google Scholar]
  102. Torsteinsdóttir, S.; Georgsson, G.; Gísladóttir, E.; Rafnar, B.; Pálsson, P.A.; Pétursson, G. Pathogenesis of central nervous system lesions in visna: Cell-mediated immunity and lymphocyte subsets in blood, brain and cerebrospinal fluid. J. Neuroimmunol. 1992, 41, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Perry, L.L.; Wilkerson, M.J.; Hullinger, G.A.; Cheevers, W.P. Depressed CD4T lymphocyte proliferative response and enhanced antibody response to viral antigen in chronic lentivirus-induced arthritis. J. Infect. Dis. 1995, 171, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Trujillo, J.D.; Hotzel, K.J.; Snekvik, K.R.; Cheevers, W.P. Antibody response to the surface envelope of caprine arthritis-encephalitis lentivirus: Disease status is predicted by SU antibody isotype. Virology 2004, 325, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bird, P.; Reyburn, H.T.; Blacklaws, B.A.; Allen, D.; Nettleton, P.; Yirrell, D.L.; Watt, N.; Sargan, D.; McConnell, I. The restricted IgG1 antibody response to maedi visna virus is seen following infection but not following immunization with recombinant gag protein. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1995, 102, 274–280. [Google Scholar]
  106. Watt, N.J.; MacIntyre, N.; Collie, D.; Sargan, D.; McConnell, I. Phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte populations in the lungs and regional lymphoid tissue of sheep naturally infected with Maedi-Visna Virus. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1992, 90, 204–208. [Google Scholar]
  107. Luján, L.; Begara, I.; Collie, D.D.; Watt, N.J. CD8+ lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage and blood: In vivo indicators of lung pathology caused by Maedi-Visna Virus. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1995, 49, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jolly, P.E.; Gangopadhyay, A.; Chen, S.; Reddy, P.G.; Weiss, H.L. Changes in the leukocyte phenotype profile of goats infected with the caprine arthritis encephalitis virus. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1997, 56, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Blacklaws, B.A; Bird, P.; Allen, D.; McConnell, I. Circulating cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors in Maedi-Visna Virus-infected sheep. J. Gen. Virol. 1994, 75, 1589–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lee, W.C.; McConnell, I.; Blacklaws, B.A. Cytotoxic activity against Maedi-Visna Virus-infected macrophages. J. Virol. 1994, 68, 8331–8338. [Google Scholar]
  111. Estes, D.M.; Brown, W.C. Type 1 and type 2 responses in regulation of Ig isotype expression in cattle. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2002, 90, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Snekvik, K.R.; Beyer, J.C.; Bertoni, G.; von Beust, B.R.; Baszler, T.V; Palmer, G.H.; McElwain, T.F.; Cheevers, W.P. Characterization of caprine interleukin-4. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2001, 78, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lechner, F.; Vogt, H.R.; Seow, H.F.; Bertoni, G.; Cheevers, W.P.; von Bodungen, U.; Zurbriggen, A; Peterhans, E. Expression of cytokine mRNA in lentivirus-induced arthritis. Am. J. Pathol. 1997, 151, 1053–1065. [Google Scholar]
  114. Woodall, C.J.; Maclaren, L.J.; Watt, N.J. Differential levels of mRNAs for cytokines, the interleukin-2 receptor and Class II DR/DQ genes in ovine interstitial pneumonia induced by Maedi visna virus infection. Vet. Pathol. 1997, 34, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Legastelois, I.; Cottin, V.; Mornex, J.F.; Cordier, G. Alveolar macrophages from sheep naturally infected by Visna-Maedi virus contribute to IL-8 production in the lung. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1997, 59, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhang, Z.; Harkiss, G.D.; Hopkins, J. Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor is elevated in alveolar macrophages from sheep naturally infected with Maedi-Visna Virus and stimulates Maedi-Visna Virus replication in macrophages in vitro. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2002, 129, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Legastelois, I.; Cordier, O.; Cozon, G.; Cador, J. Visna-Maedi virus-induced expression of interleukin-8 gene in sheep alveolar cells following experimental in vitro and in vivo infection. Res. Virol. 1996, 147, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ellis, J.A.; DeMartini, J.C. Ovine interleukin-2: Partial purification and assay in normal sheep and sheep with ovine progressive pneumonia. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1985, 8, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Legastelois, I.; Levrey, H.; Greenland, T.; Mornex, J.F.; Cordier, G. Visna-Maedi virus induces interleukin-8 in sheep alveolar macrophages through a tyrosine-kinase signaling pathway. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1998, 18, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Larruskain, A.; Bernales, I.; Luján, L.; de Andrés, D.; Amorena, B.; Jugo, B.M. Expression analysis of 13 ovine immune response candidate genes in Visna/Maedi disease progression. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 36, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. White, S.N.; Mousel, M.R.; Reynolds, J.O.; Lewis, G.S.; Herrmann-Hoesing, L.M. Common promoter deletion is associated with 3.9-fold differential transcription of ovine CCR5 and reduced proviral level of ovine progressive pneumonia virus. Anim. Genet. 2009, 40, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Shirakawa, I.; Deichmann, K.A.; Izuhara, I.; Mao, I.; Adra, C.N.; Hopkin, J.M. Atopy and asthma: Genetic variants of IL-4 and IL-13 signalling. Immunol. Today 2000, 21, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Locati, M.; Otero, K.; Schioppa, T.; Signorelli, P.; Perrier, P.; Baviera, S.; Sozzani, S.; Mantovani, A. The chemokine system: Tuning and shaping by regulation of receptor expression and coupling in polarized responses. Allergy 2002, 57, 972–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Medzhitov, R. Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature 2007, 449, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Werling, D.; Jann, O.; Offord, V.; Glass, E.; Coffey, T. Variation matters: TLR structure and species-specific pathogen recognition. Trends mmunol. 2009, 30, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Takeda, K.; Kaisho, T.; Akira, S. Toll-like receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 21, 335–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Mikula, I.; Bhide, M.; Pastorekova, S. Characterization of ovine TLR7 and TLR8 protein coding regions, detection of mutations and Maedi-Visna Virus infection. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2010, 138, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Bell, J.K.; Mullen, G.E.; Leifer, C.A.; Mazzoni, A.; Davies, D.R.; Segal, D.M. Leucine-rich repeats and pathogen recognition in Toll-like receptors. Trends Immunol. 2003, 24, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zheng, Y.H.; Peterlin, B.B. Intracellular immunity to HIV-1: Newly defined retroviral battles inside infected cells. Retrovirology 2005, 2, e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  130. Huthoff, H.; Towers, G.J. Restriction of retroviral replication by APOBEC3G/F and TRIM5alpha. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 16, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Jáuregui, P.; Crespo, H.; Glaria, I.; Luján, L.; Contreras, A.; Rosati, S.; de Andrés, D.; Amorena, B.; Towers, G.J.; Reina, R. Ovine TRIM5αcan restrict Visna/Maedi virus. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 9504–9509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Van Manen, D.; Rits, M.A.; Beugeling, C.; van Dort, K.; Schuitemaker, H.; Kootstra, N.A. The effect of Trim5 polymorphisms on the clinical course of HIV-1 infection. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. LaRue, R.S.; Jónsson, S.R.; Silverstein, K.A.T.; Lajoie, M.; Bertrand, D.; El-Mabrouk, N.; Hötzel, I.; Andrésdóttir, V.; Smith, T.P.L.; Harris, R.S. The artiodactyl APOBEC3 innate immune repertoire shows evidence for a multi-functional domain organization that existed in the ancestor of placental mammals. BMC Mol. Biol. 2008, 9, 10–1186. [Google Scholar]
  134. LaRue, R.S.; Lengyel, J.; Jonsson, S.R.; Andresdottir, V.; Harris, R.S. Lentiviral Vif degrades the APOBEC3Z3/APOBEC3H protein of its mammalian host and is capable of cross-species activity. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 8193–8201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Jónsson, S.R.; Haché, G.; Stenglein, M.D.; Fahrenkrug, S.C.; Andrésdóttir, V.; Harris, R.S. Evolutionarily conserved and non-conserved retrovirus restriction activities of artiodactyl APOBEC3F proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 5683–5694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Larruskain, A.; Jugo, B.M. Retroviral Infections in Sheep and Goats: Small Ruminant Lentiviruses and Host Interaction. Viruses 2013, 5, 2043-2061.

AMA Style

Larruskain A, Jugo BM. Retroviral Infections in Sheep and Goats: Small Ruminant Lentiviruses and Host Interaction. Viruses. 2013; 5(8):2043-2061.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Larruskain, Amaia, and Begoña M. Jugo. 2013. "Retroviral Infections in Sheep and Goats: Small Ruminant Lentiviruses and Host Interaction" Viruses 5, no. 8: 2043-2061.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop