Next Article in Journal
Water Balance of Mediterranean Quercus ilex L. and Pinus halepensis Mill. Forests in Semiarid Climates: A Review in A Climate Change Context
Next Article in Special Issue
Rural Landscape Planning and Forest Management in Tuscany (Italy)
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Use of Harvesters in Large-Diameter Hardwood-Dominated Stands
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reasons for Choosing Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and Sustainable Green Ecosystem Council (SGEC) Schemes and the Effects of Certification Acquisition by Forestry Enterprises in Japan
Article

Forest Management Certification in Romania: Motivations and Perceptions

1
Department of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, Sirul Beethowen street, no. 1, 500123 Brasov, Romania
2
Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, Sirul Beethowen street, no. 1, 500123 Brasov, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2018, 9(7), 425; https://doi.org/10.3390/f9070425
Received: 31 May 2018 / Revised: 27 June 2018 / Accepted: 13 July 2018 / Published: 15 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Policies Affecting Development and Forest Conservation)
Forestland privatization and transition to a market economy triggered important changes in the Romanian forest sector, imposing challenges for forest management structures. Voluntary forest management certification has been considered a possible solution; therefore, the certified forest area has increased rapidly regardless of the land owner. The purpose of this study is to provide an insight into the certification process. It presents the result of a survey applied to 417 forest management structures in Romania, which was intended to identify the perception of their managers regarding the reasons to adopt certification, the changes determined by the certification, the problems during the process, and the benefits. The study reveals the difference in perception among different types of forest management structures. Non-state management structures voluntarily adopted FSC certification, mainly aiming to obtain economic advantages. Most of the respondents indicated important changes in the consultation with stakeholders including local communities, transparency and clear records, the use of chemicals, and biodiversity protection. Although the FSC certification was not perceived as solving issues like illegal logging, there is a general perception that it improved forest management. The study concludes that the FSC certification proves the willingness of the Romanian forest management sector to cope with the market and trends and clarify its position in society. View Full-Text
Keywords: forest certification; management; sustainability; Romania forest certification; management; sustainability; Romania
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Halalisan, A.F.; Abrudan, I.V.; Popa, B. Forest Management Certification in Romania: Motivations and Perceptions. Forests 2018, 9, 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9070425

AMA Style

Halalisan AF, Abrudan IV, Popa B. Forest Management Certification in Romania: Motivations and Perceptions. Forests. 2018; 9(7):425. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9070425

Chicago/Turabian Style

Halalisan, Aureliu F., Ioan V. Abrudan, and Bogdan Popa. 2018. "Forest Management Certification in Romania: Motivations and Perceptions" Forests 9, no. 7: 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9070425

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop