1. Introduction
In Africa, concerns regarding forest management have led to widespread information regarding the negative aspects of forest cover by degradation and deforestation [
1,
2,
3]. Although abundant information regarding certain aspects of African forests is available, including forest cover change [
4,
5,
6,
7,
8], forest gains, and forest management guidelines, there is little information available on forest stand structures and dynamics. There is a need to strengthen and integrate national institutions to increase the capacity for countries in Africa to enforce forest laws and control the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation. The Collaborative Partnership on Forests (CPF) addresses the gap concerning the knowledge of forests in Africa [
9,
10]. Many programs and projects, such as ‘’Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in developing countries (REDD+), aim to reduce the impact on climate change, conserve biodiversity, and protect ecosystems services by reducing carbon emissions [
11,
12]. Furthermore, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is dedicated to assisting developing countries with developing national forest monitoring systems and providing relieve forest resource information for national forest policy development, planning, and sustainable management [
13].
In natural forests, the structure and dynamics of forests are the result of a large number of feedback loops and processes caused by disturbance regimes across time and space [
14]. However, forest structure and dynamics may also be a result of the interactions among species, environmental factors, and human intervention over long periods. The most common representation of forest dynamics is a spatial distribution of the diameter class structure of trees [
15,
16,
17,
18] combined with tree-ring analyses for studies of growth dynamics [
19,
20,
21,
22].
Studies addressing miombo woodland management in Africa have targeted difficult issues, including charcoal production and deforestation rates. For example, in Angola, REDD+ initiative project activities include the formulation and implementation of a community forest management plan, introduction of ameliorated kilns to produce charcoal, plantation of native species suitable for firewood and charcoal, agroforestry activities, promotion of agricultural activities, and improvement of bee-keeping activities [
23,
24]. Unfortunately, growth rates and dynamics of tree species used for charcoal production have received little attention [
8,
25,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32]. Miombo forests have mostly been studied in Zambia [
27,
33,
34], Malawi [
35,
36], Tanzania [
25,
37,
38], and Mozambique [
39,
40,
41,
42].
Miombo woodlands are a significant biome that cover about 10% of the African landmass, and they cover between 2.7 and 3.6 million km
2 in 11 African countries [
43]. In Angola, miombo woodlands cover more than 45% of the nature forest intermixed with edaphic areas and grasslands [
44,
45]. They are tropical or near tropical ecosystems characterized by continuous herbaceous cover, which mostly consists of heliophilous C
4 grasses and sedges that display clear seasonality related to water stress [
46]. It has been somewhat problematic to define the term ‘miombo’. It has been difficult to characterize miombo land use under climate change, and the biome has been inadequately represented in regional and global modeling efforts and policy formation. A mature undisturbed miombo is physiognomically a closed deciduous forest within the spectrum of savannah ecosystems grading into a seasonal dry forest with a mean annual rainfall between 800 and 1400 mm; canopy heights are no more than 15 m. Local vernacular uses terms such as woodland, bushland, wooded grassland, and savanna. However, the use of the term savanna to describe miombo is discontinued because it has been defined in so many different ways that it is no longer possible to use it in a precise classificatory sense [
47,
48]. The term miombo originated from the Bantu language and it has been used by ecologists in Africa to refer those trees of the genus
Brachystegia, including species such as
Brachystegia floribunda,
Brachystegia glaberrina,
Brachystegia longifolia,
Jubernardia paniculata,
Isoberlian angolensis, and
Marquesia macrouura [
25,
47,
49,
50].
Most of the miombo trees and shrubs flourish in the same period immediately after the rains. The increasing need for agricultural lands due to population increases, and the unsustainable use and overharvesting of natural resources, combined with the impacts of climate change (e.g., drought, fires), allows for insufficient time for many miombo trees and associated species to regenerate naturally. These stressors have produced areas classified as open and closed miombo areas [
51]. This classification system first appeared with the use of aerial photographs dating from 1946, 1967, and 1981 to determine past vegetation patterns and disturbances [
52,
53]. The classification system has also been used in studies of past assessments of land use and cover change [
8,
43,
54,
55]. Semi-arid climate is the main edaphic determinant that leads to a division of dry miombo (located in an area of less than 1000 mm of annual rainfall) and wet miombo (located in areas with more than 1000 mm annual rainfall), which occur in the northern part of the miombo distribution, including eastern Angola, northern Zambia, southwestern Tanzania, and central Malawi [
46,
56,
57]. Ecosystem services (ES) from miombo provide important contributions to the livelihoods of millions in the rural and urban populations, and they help alleviate the poverty in the region. Some of the miombo ES include the provision of fuelwood, building materials, and fruit for rural populations, in addition to charcoal, bush-meat, and medicines that rural and urban populations rely on. However, miombo offer little value for logging because of the low proportion of commercially valuable timber species. The management of miombo areas must address multiple objectives.
Current efforts to improve the management of miombo are misguided and based on poor information, and they serve to distract from science-based efforts to address challenges with the forests [
47,
58,
59,
60,
61,
62]. Challenges of miombo management include low inherent productivity, limited support to develop local forest enterprise, a lack of strong local organization, a legacy of armed conflict, and low resource rents associated with high management transaction costs.
In Angola, miombo forests were mainly assessed on the spatial dynamics of the central-plateau and species diversity [
49,
54,
63,
64,
65,
66]. The overextraction of wood resources, due to clearing for agricultural purposes, charcoal production, indiscriminate burning, and sometimes overgrazing, creates disorder that impacts the health of forests in Angola [
54,
65] . The land-use change in forests due to human activities has been demonstrated in miombo forests [
6,
54,
64,
67,
68].
The Angolan civil war, which lasted for 27 years, made people understand the importance of forests because they were a means of survival in periods when people could not work on farms. It is very difficult to imagine life without forest resources. The importance of forest resources is known, but establishing the best forest management policies and practices takes a long time and the best data available. The forests were overexploited during the war and no management was conducted, and many small trees were harvested for charcoal and firewood [
69]. The government established a minimum cutting tree diameter (MCD) of 20 cm at diameter at breast height (DBH), thus local peoples are only allowed to cut a tree that is at least 20 cm DBH. Government strategies of forest resources management have focused on prohibitions and restrictions. For instance, no records of certain harvesting techniques, delineation of mature and immature stands, and post-harvest sowing or planting of new trees are available to managers.
During and after the civil war (1975–2002), the acquisition of forest data in miombo forests was difficult due to the presence of landmines. More recently, remote sensing has allowed for the collection of some forest data throughout the country. However, data on tree growth patterns are almost nonexistent because Angola has still not completed the National Forestry Inventory. The country lacks forest laws and an appropriate legal management framework.
To obtain an overview of Angolan miombo forests and to help formulate forest policy and laws, it is imperative to describe the patterns of tree species distributions and dynamics in terms of tree growth. The primary objective of our study is to characterize forest structure, as expressed in terms of tree abundance by tree diameter classes. From that data, we described the patterns of six of the most representative tree species of miombo forests in Angola, and we predicted the minimum harvestable diameter using fitted models to support sustainable forest practices and management in miombo forests of Angola.
4. Discussion
The diameter distribution is a common approach used to describe the structure and growth of a stand. It illustrates the structure of a stand in terms of DBH and abundance of individual tree species in a forest. It can also help identify species that can regenerate in a given ecosystem. When diameter distribution characterizes a single peak that is left skewed, then this pattern must be maintained (because the median is the most descriptive measure of the central tendency) through silvicultural interventions (
Figure 5). However, the dynamic patterns of most species begin more vigorous growth at around the age of 20, with a DBH of 20 to 30 cm (
Table 3). Some species displayed a narrow inverted-J distribution, which represents a typical distribution for uneven-aged forests [
93,
94,
95,
96]. A U-shaped distribution was observed for species like
P. angolensis and
E. abyssinica, which suggests that forest stand dynamics are primarily controlled by competition (
Figure 5C,E,F). Irregularity of the diameter distribution reflects the importance that each tree species represents to local communities, which explains the abundance of non-charcoal production tree species in open miombo forests (
Figure 4). The categorization of open or closed miombo is related to its land use for settlement and infrastructure development, including arable and pastoral agriculture, cutting of live wood resources for building poles and fencing materials, and unsustainable fuel wood harvesting [
97]. These anthropogenic activities represent the major factors that determine the structure and dynamic of miombo forests. The main tree species used for charcoal production were not common in open miombo (
Figure 3 and
Figure 4). Brachystegia speciformis,
B. boehmii,
A. antunesiana, and
G. abyssinica best characterized the forest structure and species composition. The reduced presence of a particular species in the management zones is attributed to the selective or unsustainable harvesting for charcoal production. This finding is in agreement with the finding of several other studies of the structure, dynamics, and composition of miombo forests [
34,
52,
66,
97,
98]. However,
P. angolensis, an important timber species, was a very important species in the past for people living around miombo forests [
99]. Based on the questionnaire survey, forest ownership mostly depends on family wealth in terms of land possession, which is passed on by inheritance.
By fitting separate models in KORFit, we were able to establish different growth patterns and predict the number of years each tree species needed to attain a certain diameter. The growth curves presented had relatively good fit for the selected tree species in our study area. For instance, trees need at least 25 to 35 years to achieve the assumed allowable minimum cut diameter (DBH 20 cm), as established by the Angolan government (Institute for Forest Development). Logistic and Gompertz growth functions provided the best fits for the miombo tree species, as confirmed by the higher RMSE (3.86–3.96) and lower AIC (628.83) values compared to other models. The lowest RMSE, 2.12–2.96, and AIC was found in
B. boehmii for Gompertz and Korf functions (
Table 5). Similar studies have been published that examined the relationships between species, tree diameter, height, and age [
31,
100,
101,
102].
The model selection criteria, AIC, RMSE, and p-value, tended to select complex model functions that were overfit in KORFit software. However, it is important to recognize that growth functions for miombo tree species are still hard to perform due to the difficulty of collecting data for growth modeling. It is also important to remember that the more complex the mode is, the more difficult the results are in terms of predictive values.
The pattern of annual ring development provides a means to determine the age for regrowth stands in miombo and predict the merchantable age for the species for timber or charcoal production in miombo. It is difficult to detect the growth rings of miombo species [
103]. Therefore, allometric models are often used for the prediction and estimation of volume and biomass of miombo tree species [
37,
104,
105]. The results of this study can be used to determine the appropriate allowable cut in each management zone and the future cutting cycles in miombo forests (in open and closed miombo).
4.1. Description of the Structure for Management Planning Zones
Management zoning helps farmers, managers, and policy makers identify and address the major problems in each area. Similar studies that have suggested management zoning as an introductive framework for management come from Sweden [
106,
107,
108], the Czech Republic [
109,
110,
111,
112], and Poland [
19,
113,
114,
115]. Forest zoning consists of separating the land base into different management zones to address specific objectives; for example, conservation zones, intensive production zones, or even unmanaged zones (
Figure 7). The categorization of open and closed miombo has been discussed in many published works and most do not describe the characteristics of these miombo categories [
3,
43,
116,
117,
118]. In addition, the distribution of land management zone regimes and specific tree species growing in each zone have not been described [
98]. The development of a matrix model will help promote better decisions in the management of miombo [
119,
120]. The finding of our studies suggest that models should focus on the development of management approaches tailored to each management zone (open or closed miombo) based on actual tree species presence, abundances, and its importance to local communities. We suggest managing the miombo with policies, incentives, and options for local rural communities within the framework of management zones to facilitate the establishment of forest management guidelines.
4.1.1. Management zones A (MZ 0—A)
Administrated from Ukuma municipality, however, this zone also covers Tchindjende municipality. In these zones, only firewood collection that targets fallen branches or the dead trees shall be allowed. The guidelines for management shall be to coordinate from Ukuma municipality, under the control of the Ministry of Agriculture. This zone represents plantations with potential timber production. Therefore, coppice forestry, with different silvicultural treatments, such as thinning, is recommended. The incentives for these management zones shall consist of technical assistance to optimize the harvest schedule.
4.1.2. Management Zone B (MZ 1—B)
Administrated from Bailundo municipality, management zone B represents closed miombo, which are areas still suitable for charcoal production. In these zones, the presence of the preferred species used for timber and charcoal production is much higher. Therefore, from a long-term perspective, we suggest to have this zone a conservation area for timber production only. It is recommended that these zones be conserved for timber production for at least 25 to 35 years without charcoal production (
Figure 6) and allow for the collection of firewood only.
4.1.3. Management Zone C (MZ 2—C)
There are four MZ 2 areas with similar patterns of tree species distributions and stages of degradation. The administration shall be from Londuimbali municipality and it will cover the areas of Mungo and Longojo with similar management guidelines (
Figure 7). The Management zone C represents open miombo, which is the main zone where charcoal and firewood comes from. Due to the intense production of charcoal, these zones shall be limited to the collection of firewood only. The silvicultural approach recommended for these areas is a coppice system, which allows for regeneration that can later serve as firewood. The government shall provide incentives for farmers that decide not to produce charcoal within this zone for at least 10 to 20 years.
4.1.4. Management Zone D (MZ 3—D)
Management zone D covers two municipalities and it shall be administrated from Huambo municipality. It represents the grassland or savannas left for pastoral activities. The extraction of firewood and charcoal is intense in this zone due to the expansion of agricultural activities. This zone represents a conversion of miombo forest to agricultural lands [
64]. The agricultural period in this zone begins after the original miombo forest is slashed and burned (
Appendix A), and then new fertile areas are opened. After four to 15 years of cultivation, the land becomes poor and unsuitable for agricultural activities [
121,
122], and it is covered by grass and small shrubs. If natural regeneration processes are not interrupted, this zone becomes an MZ—C with areas of open miombo where shrubs and small miombo trees persist (
Appendix A and
Appendix C).
4.1.5. Management Zone E (MZ 4—E)
Management zone E is represented by two zones and it could be administered from Ekunha municipality. This zone is a transition of MZ—D to MZ—E and is mainly a combination of agricultural lands and grassy vegetation. Agricultural lands become useless after five periods of continued cultivation and the fields are eventually only used for pastoral activities [
122]. It is recommended that agroforestry systems would be a good fit in this zone.
To manage miombo woodlands needs sustainably, good knowledge of forest structure, composition, and tree growth rates within each management zone is critical. In the past, the creation of cutting rotation cycles for miombo species has been hindered by difficulties in determining the age of the trees because it was assumed that many tree species do not form annual rings [
123,
124]. However, dendrochronological studies have proven that miombo tree species produce distinct annual growth rings, and many of these studies encourage the use of tree ring analysis as a tool to understand the age structure and growth dynamics of miombo for sustainable management [
125].