Next Article in Journal
Growth and Its Relationship to Individual Genetic Diversity of Mountain Hemlock (Tsuga mertensiana) at Alpine Treeline in Alaska: Combining Dendrochronology and Genomics
Previous Article in Journal
Compatible System for Predicting Total and Merchantable Stem Volume over and under Bark, Branch Volume and Whole-Tree Volume of Pine Species
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 8
Issue 11
10.3390/f8110419
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dynamics of Understory Shrub Biomass in Six Young Plantations of Southern Subtropical China

by
Yuanqi Chen
1,
Xi’an Cai
2,
Yanju Zhang
2,3,
Xingquan Rao
2 and
Shenglei Fu
4,*
1
Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Clean-utilization and Mine Environment Protection, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China
2
Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4
College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2017, 8(11), 419; https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110419
Submission received: 3 August 2017 / Revised: 18 October 2017 / Accepted: 30 October 2017 / Published: 2 November 2017
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Understory shrubs are an important component of forest ecosystems and drive ecosystem processes, such as ecosystem carbon cycling. However, shrub biomass carbon stocks have rarely been reported, which limits our understanding of ecosystem C stock and cycling. In this study, we evaluated carbon accumulation of shrub species using allometric equations based on height and basal diameter in six subtropical plantations at the age of 1, 3, 4 and 6 years. The results showed that plantation type did not significantly affect the total biomass of shrubs, but it significantly affected the biomass of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, Ilex asprella, Clerodendrum fortunatum and Baeckea frutescens. The biomass of dominant shrub species R. tomentosa, I. asprella, Gardenia jasminoides and Melastoma candidum increased with stand age, while the biomass of C. fortunatum and B. frutescens decreased. The inconsistent biomass-time patterns of different shrub species may be the primary reason for the altered total shrub biomass in each plantation. Consequently, we proposed that R. tomentosa, I. asprella, G. jasminoides and M. candidum could be preferable for understory carbon accumulation and should be maintained or planted because of their important functions in carbon accumulation and high economic values in the young plantations of southern subtropical China.

1. Introduction

Shrubs are a type of vegetal group with a specific structure [1] and are essential to the biophysical and biodynamic processes of different ecosystems [2,3]. In arid and semi-arid ecosystems, shrubs are conducive to the increase in the number of herb-layer plant species [4]. In subtropical forests, shrubs facilitate the growth of understory tree seedling [5,6]. In reclaimed mined sites, shrubs act as ecosystem engineers [7]. In addition, understory shrub increases litter decomposition and the accumulation of litter-derived carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in forest soils by altering soil microbial activity and community composition [8,9,10].
Physiological and ecological characteristics of shrubs have been systematically studied [11,12,13]. Palmroth et al. [14] found that an understory shrub had little response to N additions in terms of photosynthetic physiology or growth in boreal coniferous forests, which indicated that the shrub played a vital role in ecosystem C and N cycling. In addition, understory shrubs can respond quickly to thinning of even-aged stands [15]. Currently, increasing studies on shrubs focus on total shrub biomass and biomass carbon storage [16,17]. Bai et al. [18] reported the dynamics of two multi-stemmed understory shrubs in two temperate forests. Regarding the dynamics of understory shrub biomass, more attention has been paid to comparisons of different stand ages in a single forest type, or different forest types in a specific stand age [19,20]. Meanwhile, estimation of shrub biomass is addressed at different scales. Shrub biomass was calculated from remote sensing data, terrestrial and airbone LiDAR data in dryland ecosystems [21,22,23], or biomass allometric equations [19]. Dynamics of total understory shrub biomass and an individual shrub species biomass in different plantations have not been widely reported, especially in young subtropical plantations.
The plantation area of China (69 million hectares) is one third of that of the total global area [24], of which subtropical plantations account for more than 60% [25]. Most subtropical plantations are young plantations. Hanley [15] found that the understory shrub and herb biomass makes up a large proportion of ecosystem productivity in young forests relative to old forests. Indeed, understory vegetation is even recognized as a principal driver of ecosystem function and process [26,27]). Chastain Jr et al. [28] reported that shrubs and herbs could have high potential carbon sequestration in Appalachian forests. Nonetheless, understory and forest floor are recognized as a whole in general [29], and the contributions of shrubs and herbs to the carbon sink are not separated [30,31]. Therefore, more research is needed to clarify the role of understory shrub communities and an individual shrub species in carbon cycling of subtropical forest ecosystems.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the dynamics of shrub biomass at the early restoration stages in plantations and to select preferable understory shrub species for the carbon sink. To this end, we calculated the biomass of individual shrub species and the total biomass of shrubs in six young subtropical plantations and evaluated their dynamics from age 1 to 6 years. Our research provides useful references on management of understory shrub species based on carbon accumulation of the shrub biomass.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites

This study was conducted at the Heshan National Field Research Station of Forest Ecosystem (112°54′ E, 22°41′ N), located in Guangdong province, China. The climate in this region is typical subtropical monsoon, with a distinct wet (April to September) and dry season (October to March), mean annual precipitation of 1700 mm and mean annual temperature of 21.7 °C. The average altitude is 10–80 m. The soil is classified as an Ultisol developed from sandstone. The dynamics of understory shrub biomass were studied in six plantations, including Eucalyptus urophylla monoculture plantation (EU), Acacia crassicarpa monoculture plantation (AC), Castanopsis hystrix monoculture plantation (CH), 10-species mixed plantation (M10), 30-species mixed plantation (M30) and a naturally recovered shrubland (NS). These plantations were established in 2005 on hilly land with similar site characteristics, and the tree seedlings were planted at a spacing of 2 m × 3 m (about 1650 trees per hectare) except for the naturally recovered shrubland where the plants sprouted naturally and were not be planted. Each plantation had three replicate plots, and the area of each plot was 1 hectare. All plots were distributed randomly in the experimental site with an area of 50 hectares. A permanent quadrat plot of 900 m2 (30 m by 30 m) was established in each plot with an area of 1 hectare. The height of trees in these plantations is shown in Table 1.

2.2. Methods

Vegetation inventories were conducted in permanent quadrats in 2006, 2008, 2009 and 2011, corresponding to 1 year, 3 years, 4 years and 6 years, respectively, after permanent quadrat plots were established in these plantations. A permanent quadrat plot was divided into nine subplots (four 5 m × 5 m small subplots for each subplot). In each subplot, we selected two bidiagonal small subplots and then measured the height and basal diameter of all shrubs during each inventory. There were eighteen small subplots in a permanent quadrat plot for each inventory. The biomass of each shrub species was estimated by allometric regression equations in all plantations [32].

2.3. Statistics Analysis

Two-way ANOVAs were employed to test the effects of plantation type and stand age on the number of shrub species, total biomass of shrubs, and biomass of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, Ilex asprella, Gardenia jasminoides, Melastoma candidum, Clerodendrum fortunatum, Baeckea frutescens. One-way ANOVA and multiple comparison analysis (LSD) were performed to determine the effect of plantation type on the number of shrub species and total biomass of shrubs at the same stand age, and the effect of stand age on the number of shrub species and the total biomass of shrubs in the same plantation. Data were reciprocally or square-root transformed when required to meet the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. Statistical significance was determined at P < 0.05. All analyses were performed with SPSS software (SPSS. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Dynamics of Shrub Species

The number of shrub species was significantly affected by plantation type (two-way ANOVA, F = 3.18, P = 0.015). It was higher in AC than in other plantations (Figure 1). The number of shrub species was the highest in AC at the age of 3 and 6 years (about 13.3 species), and it was the lowest in EU at the age of 1 year and in NS at the age of 6 years (about 7 species). However, stand age did not significantly affect the number of shrub species (two-way ANOVA, F = 1.44, P = 0.243). The interaction between plantation type and stand age was not significant (F = 0.44, P = 0.957).
During the period of 1 to 6 years old, 23 shrub species were found in these plantations regardless of plantation type (Table 2). About 16, 13, 16, 13, 13 and 15 species were found in NS, EU, AC, CH, M10 and M30, respectively, 10 of which were shared by these given plantations regardless of replicated quadrats. Endemic species also present included Glochidion zeylanicum only in NS, Glochidion eriocarpum in AC, Garcinia oligantha in CH, Cassia alata, Symplocos chinensis, and Psychotria rubra in M30 (Table 2).

3.2. Dynamics of the Total Shrub Biomass

Two-way ANOVA indicated that plantation type did not significantly affect the total biomass of shrubs (two-way ANOVA, F = 1.46, P = 0.223). However, to some extent, the total biomass of shrubs was affected by stand age (two-way ANOVA, F = 2.74, P = 0.054; Figure 2). The interaction between plantation type and stand age was not significant (F = 0.60, P = 0.858). In all given plantations, the total biomass of shrubs at the age of 4 and 6 years was significantly higher than that at the age of 1 year (P = 0.025 and P = 0.013, respectively. The average biomass increased from 704.09 kg ha−1 at the age of 1 year to 1571.66 kg ha−1 at the age of 6 years regardless of plantation type (Figure 2).

3.3. Biomass of the Dominant Shrub Species

The biomass of each dominant shrub species in all given plantations was separately evaluated and analyzed (Figure 3). From 1 to 6 years, the summation of biomass for these six dominant shrub species, namely, R. tomentosa, I. asprella, G. jasminoides, M. candidum, C. fortunatum and B. frutescens), accounted for about 94.84–97.40%, 91.87–95.56%, 85.19–91.58%, 88.94–98.44%, 91.04–97.98%, and 91.09–98.20% of the total biomass of shrubs in NS, EU, AC, CH, M10, and M30, respectively. Among these six shrub species, the biomass of R. tomentosa was the highest (Figure 3), and it accounted for about 42.43–80.92% of the total biomass of shrubs.
Two-way ANOVA showed that plantation type significantly affected the biomass of R. tomentosa, I. asprella, C. fortunatum and B. frutescens (Table 3). The biomass of R. tomentosa was significantly higher in M30 than in other plantations, it was also higher in M10 than in CH (P < 0.034, and P = 0.027, respectively). Biomass of I. asprella was significantly higher in AC than in CH, M10 and M30 (P < 0.021). Biomass of C. fortunatum was significantly lower in NS than in AC, CH and M10 (P < 0.021), and it was also lower significantly in EU than in M10 (P = 0.031). Stand age significantly affected the biomass of I. asprella, M. candidum, C. fortunatum and B. frutescens. Stand age also had an effect on the biomass of R. tomentosa to some extent (Table 3). The biomass of R. tomentosa, I. asprella, M. candidum increased from 453.13, 84.99, 25.42 kg ha−1 at the age of 1 year to 1049.26, 204.15, 56.15 kg ha−1 at the age of 6 years, regardless of plantation type (Figure 3). The biomass of R. tomentosa and M. candidum was higher in plantations at the age of 4 and 6 years than that at the age of 1 year (P = 0.034, and P = 0.011, respectively), and the biomass of I. asprella was higher in plantations at the age of 3 and 6 years than that at the age of 1 year (P = 0.005, and P = 0.038, respectively). However, the biomass of C. fortunatum and B. frutescens decreased significantly from 72.65, 36.88 kg ha−1 at the age of 1 year to 18.44, 9.19 kg ha−1 at the age of 6 years regardless of plantation type (P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Neither plantation type nor stand age affected the biomass of G. jasminoides, but its average biomass increased to 41.33 kg ha−1 at the age of 6 years relative to 15.79 kg ha−1 at the age of 1 year regardless of plantation type.

4. Discussion

4.1. Effects of Plantation Type

Plantation type affected the number of shrub species significantly. The number of shrub species was obviously higher in AC than that in other plantations, which was the highest in AC, and the lowest in NS. This can be ascribed to the understory abiotic and biotic conditions and the characteristics of species [33,34]. Shrub germination may be affected by herbs through competition for nutrients and light; higher herb biomass hinders shrub species germination [35,36]. In these studied plantations, herbs were dominated by Dicranopteris dichotoma [27]. The herb biomass was the lowest in AC, and the highest in NS [32].
Regardless of plantation type and stand age, 23 shrub species were found in the studied plantations. The number of shrub species was very close to the previous research result (13–23 species) [37]. Carneiro et al. [38] found that the average number of understory species was 6–15 in Eucalyptus plantations aged 1 and 10 years old. Luo et al. [39] also found the diversity of shrub species was similar among subtropical plantations in southern China. In our research, some endemic species in the specific plantations were found, yet the possible reasons why these endemic species were only present in specific plantations are still unclear and could need further study.
Plantation type significantly affected the biomass of R. tomentosa, I. asprella, C. fortunatum and B. frutescens. Soil physicochemical properties could make contributions to the difference [40]. However, we previously found that there were no significant differences in soil organic carbon among these plantations [41], and there were no significant differences in soil pH, soil nitrogen, soil available phosphorus among the above six plantations [42]. Moreover, in our experimental sites, the effects of plantation type on mean soil temperature, soil water content, and leaf area index were not significant either [43]. Therefore, we speculate that it could be ascribed to the differences in microenvironment among different plantations. For instance, AC had the highest canopy density (from direct observation); thus, the light in the understory could be the weakest for all studied plantations.

4.2. Effects of Stand Age

Stand age did not significantly affect the number of shrub species. This is inconsistent with another study in humid tropical plantations [44]. The diverse climates could be responsible for the differences [45,46]. A previous study suggested that understory richness was driven by loss of early colonists [47]. In our study, these plantations were still young and the understory shrub species may have not developed to the stage of loss of early colonists. Therefore, the effect of stand age on the number of shrub species could be negligible.
The total biomass of shrubs increased from 704.09 kg ha−1 at the age of 1 year to 1571.66 kg ha−1 at the age of 6 years regardless of plantation type, which was higher than the result (158 kg ha−1) of the previous study [48]. Plantation type did not significantly influence the total biomass of shrubs in our study. The likely reasons were that all studied plantations were young and the canopies were not completely closed (from direct observation). A large proportion of shrub species received sufficient light for growth [49]. In addition, shrubs can adopt an arborescent shape under a tree canopy to some extent [50]. The change in biomass with stand age was consistent with Li et al. [51]. In these studied plantations, the total biomass of shrubs were mainly from the biomass of R. tomentosa, I. asprella, G. jasminoides, M. candidum, C. fortunatum and B. frutescens. The summed biomass of these six shrub species accounted for about 85.19–98.44% of the total biomass of shrubs. The result from the survey of shrub species also suggested that R. tomentosa, G. jasminoides, C. fortunatum and B. frutescens were dominant understory shrub species in subtropical forests in eastern Guangdong, China [52]. Furthermore, the dominant shrub species R. tomentosa, M. candidum, I. asprella and G. jasminoides have high economic values. For instance, Rhodomyrtone is a natural antibacterial drug candidate from R. tomentosa [53]. The root extracts from I. asprella lessen acute respiratory distress syndrome in mice infected with the influenza virus [54].
Stand age significantly affected the biomass of I. asprella, M. candidum, C. fortunatum and B. frutescens. It also slightly influenced the biomass of R. tomentosa (Table 3). The biomass of R. tomentosa, I. asprella, M. candidum increased with stand age. The increase in biomass resulted from plant height and basal diameter increases. However, the biomass of C. fortunatum and B. frutescens decreased with stand ages. The decrease in biomass was mainly caused by individuals being reduced (Table 4). The biomass of G. jasminoides did not show obvious changes with stand age, which could be a result of the wide environmental adaptation of G. jasminoides [55,56]. Overall, different shrub species had varied responses to stand age. However, the soil physiochemical properties (i.e., soil moisture content, soil pH, and soil organic matter content) and soil microbial communities of different shrub species were very similar in a Eucalyptus plantation [57]. Thus, changes in the light environment could be one of the main reasons. Furthermore, there are various optimum light levels for the growth of different shrubs [6,58]. For example, G. jasminoides showed its optimum growth rate above 52% sunlight [49], and there was a very rigorous light demand by B. frutescens [59].

5. Conclusions

In this study, plantation type significantly affected the number of shrub species, but stand age did not. The effects of plantation type and stand age on the total biomass of shrubs were not significant. Moreover, there were similar dominant shrub species in the six plantations. The biomass of the dominant shrub species R. tomentosa, I. asprella, G. jasminoides and M. candidum increased with stand age, while the biomass of C. fortunatum and B. frutescens decreased. These results suggest that shrub species such as R. tomentosa, I. asprella, G. jasminoides and M. candidum could be suitable for carbon accumulation by understory plant biomass in young plantations in southern subtropical China. These four species have high economic values. Consequently, we propose that R. tomentosa, I. asprella, G. jasminoides and M. candidum should be maintained or planted under plantations.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1

Acknowledgments

We thank Jianping Wu, Lei Zuo and Jie Zhao for their helpful comments and for their help in refining the language of the manuscript. This study work was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of the Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project of China (31210103920), the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2017JJ3083), the Research Foundation of the Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China (17B099), and the Forestry Science and Technology Innovation Project in Guangdong province (2014KJCX019-03). We express our sincere gratitude to all members of the Heshan National Field Observation and Research Station of the Forest Ecosystem in China and all members of the Restoration Ecology Research Group, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author Contributions

This study was carried out with collaboration among all authors. Shenglei Fu conceived and designed the experiments; Yuanqi Chen and Yanju Zhang performed the experiments; Yuanqi Chen and Xi’an Cai checked the experimental results; Xi’an Cai and Xingquan Rao provided the experimental data; Yuanqi Chen wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mandal, G.; Joshi, S.P. Estimation of above-ground biomass and carbon stock of an invasive woody shrub in the subtropical deciduous forests of Doon Valley, western Himalaya, India. J. For. Res. 2015, 26, 291–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Di Castri, F.; Goodall, D.W.; Specht, R.L. Mediterranean Type Shrubland; Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1981; p. 56. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang, B.; Li, Y.; Ding, B.; Both, S.; Erfmeier, A.; Härdtle, W.; Ma, K.; Schmid, B.; Scholten, T.; Seidler, G.; et al. Impact of tree diversity and environmental conditions on the survival of shrub species in a forest biodiversity experiment in subtropical China. J. Plant Ecol. 2017, 10, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. He, Y.; Liu, X.; Xie, Z. Shrub effects on herbaceous vegetation vary with growth stages and herb relative location. Pol. J. Ecol. 2014, 62, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, L.; Ren, H.; Liu, N.; Wang, J. The shrub Rhodomyrtus tomentosa acts as a nurse plant for seedlings differing in shade tolerance in degraded land of South China. J. Veg. Sci. 2010, 21, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, N.; Zhu, W.; Sun, Z.; Yang, L.; Yuan, S.; Ren, H. Canopy size dependent facilitations from the native shrub Rhodomyrtus tomentosa to the early establishment of native trees Castanopsis fissa and Syzygium hancei in tropical China. Restor. Ecol. 2014, 22, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alday, J.G.; Santana, V.M.; Marrs, R.H.; Martínez-Ruiz, C. Shrub-induced understory vegetation changes in reclaimed mine sites. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 73, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, J.; Wan, S.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, L.; Fu, S. Contributions of understory and/or overstory vegetations to soil microbial PLFA and nematode diversities in eucalyptus monocultures. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hortal, S.; Bastida, F.; Moreno, J.L.; Armas, C.; García, C.; Pugnaire, F.I. Benefactor and allelopathic shrub species have different effects on the soil microbial community along an environmental severity gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 88, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qiao, Y.; Miao, S.; Silva, L.C.; Horwath, W.R. Understory species regulate litter decomposition and accumulation of C and N in forest soils: A long-term dual-isotope experiment. For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 329, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Restrepo, C.; Vargas, A. Seeds and seedlings of two neotropical montane understory shrubs respond differently to anthropogenic edges and treefall gaps. Oecologia 1999, 119, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Katahata, S.I.; Naramoto, M.; Kakubari, Y.; Mukai, Y. Seasonal changes in photosynthesis and nitrogen allocation in leaves of different ages in evergreen understory shrub Daphniphyllum humile. Trees 2007, 21, 619–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Knapp, E.E.; Weatherspoon, C.P.; Skinner, C.N. Shrub seed banks in mixed conifer forests of northern California and the role of fire in regulating abundance. Fire Ecol. 2012, 8, 32–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Palmroth, S.; Bach, L.H.; Nordin, A.; Palmqvist, K. Nitrogen-addition effects on leaf traits and photosynthetic carbon gain of boreal forest understory shrubs. Oecologia 2014, 175, 457–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hanley, T.A. Potential management of young-growth stands for understory vegetation and wildlife habitat in southeastern Alaska. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2005, 72, 95–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hou, L.; Lei, R. Carbon dioxide sequestration of main shrub species in a natural secondary Pinus Tabulaeformis forest at the Huoditang forest zone in the Qinling Moutain. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2009, 29, 6077–6084, (In Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  17. Pasalodos-Tato, M.; Ruiz-Peinado, R.; Del Río, M.; Montero, G. Shrub biomass accumulation and growth rate models to quantify carbon stocks and fluxes for the Mediterranean region. Eur. J. For. Res. 2015, 134, 537–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bai, X.; Brenes-Arguedas, T.; Ye, J.; Wang, X.; Lin, F.; Yuan, Z.; Shi, S.; Xing, D.; Hao, Z. Dynamics of two multi-stemmed understory shrubs in two temperate forests. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zeng, H.; Liu, Q.; Feng, Z.; Ma, Z. Biomass equations for four shrub species in subtropical China. J. For. Res. 2010, 15, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pang, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, L.; Cui, H. Characteristics of shrub layer biomass and carbon density in different forest types and different regions in Hubei province. J. Northwest For. Univ. 2014, 29, 46–51, (In Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  21. Zandler, H.; Brenning, A.; Samimi, C. Quantifying dwarf shrub biomass in an arid environment: Comparing empirical methods in a high dimensional setting. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 158, 140–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, A.; Glenn, N.F.; Olsoy, P.J.; Mitchell, J.J.; Shrestha, R. Aboveground biomass estimates of sagebrush using terrestrial and airborne LiDAR data in a dryland ecosystem. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2015, 213, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Greaves, H.E.; Vierling, L.A.; Eitel, J.U.; Boelman, N.T.; Magney, T.S.; Prager, C.M.; Griffin, K.L. High-resolution mapping of aboveground shrub biomass in Arctic tundra using airborne lidar and imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2016, 184, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. State Forestry Administration. The Main Results of the 8th National Forest Resources Inventory (from 2009 to 2013). 2014. Available online: http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/65/content-659670.html (accessed on 1 August 2017).
  25. Wang, H.; Liu, S.R.; Mo, J.M.; Wang, J.X.; Makeschin, F.; Wolff, M. Soil organic carbon stock and chemical composition in four plantations of indigenous tree species in subtropical China. Ecol. Res. 2010, 25, 1071–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nilsson, M.; Wardle, D. Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: Evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2005, 3, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, J.; Wan, S.; Li, Z.; Shao, Y.; Xu, G.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, L.; Fu, S. Dicranopteris-dominated understory as major driver of intensive forest ecosystem in humid subtropical and tropical region. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 49, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chastain, R.A., Jr.; Currie, W.S.; Townsend, P.A. Carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling implications of the evergreen understory layer in Appalachian forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 231, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, C.; Wei, X.; Zhou, G.; Yan, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Liu, H.; Tang, X.; Zhang, Q. Impacts of a large-scale reforestation program on carbon storage dynamics in Guangdong, China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, X.; Zhao, J.; Wu, J.; Chen, H.; Lin, Y.; Zhou, L.; Fu, S. Impacts of understory species removal and/or addition on soil respiration in a mixed forest plantation with southern China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 261, 1053–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, J.; Liu, Z.; Chen, D.; Huang, G.; Zhou, L.; Fu, S. Understory plants can make substantial contributions to soil respiration: Evidence from two subtropical plantations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 2355–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Rao, X.; Wang, X.; Liang, C.; Lin, Y.; Zhou, L.; Cai, X.; Fu, S. Carbon storage and allocation pattern in plant biomass among different forest plantation stands in Guangdong, China. Forests 2015, 6, 794–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, S.; Zobel, K. Climate warming may facilitate invasion of the exotic shrub Lantana camara. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Michalet, R.; Brooker, R.W.; Lortie, C.J.; Maalouf, J.P.; Pugnaire, F.I. Disentangling direct and indirect effects of a legume shrub on its understorey community. Oikos 2015, 124, 1251–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fernández, M.E.; Gyenge, J.E.; Salda, G.D.; Schlichter, T.M. Silvopastoral systems in northwestern Patagonia I: Growth and photosynthesis of Stipa speciosa under different levels of Pinus ponderosa cover. Agrofor. Syst. 2002, 55, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dyer, L.A.; Letourneau, D.K.; Chavarria, G.V.; Amoretti, D.S. Herbivores on a dominant understory shrub increase local plant diversity in rain forest communities. Ecology 2010, 91, 3707–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhou, G.; Chen, F.; Zhou, J.; Kuang, X.; Niu, D.; Ye, C.; Guo, X. A Study on Species Diversity of Shrubs in Eucalyptus spp. Plantation under Different Management Practices. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis 2012, 34, 59–65, (In Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  38. Carneiro, M.; Fabião, A.; Martins, M.C.; Cerveira, C.; Santos, C.; Nogueira, C.; Lousã, M.; Hilário, L.; Fabião, A.; Abrantes, M.; et al. Species richness and biomass of understory vegetation in a Eucalyptus globulus Labill. coppice as affected by slash management. Eur. J. For. Res. 2007, 126, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Luo, Y.; Chen, F.; Xue, C.; Liu, P. Species diversity of shrub layer in forest communities, Guangdong Province in South China. Guangdong For. Technol. 2014, 30, 8–14, (In Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  40. Becknell, J.M.; Powers, J.S. Stand age and soils as drivers of plant functional traits and aboveground biomass in secondary tropical dry forest. Can. J. For. Res. 2014, 44, 604–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, Y.; Yu, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, T.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, W.; Fu, S. Reforestation makes a minor contribution to soil carbon accumulation in the short term: Evidence from four subtropical plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2017, 384, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, F.; Zhu, W.; Xia, H.; Fu, S.; Li, Z. Nitrogen mineralization and leaching in the early stages of a subtropical reforestation in Southern China. Restor. Ecol. 2010, 18, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yu, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Fu, S.; Li, Z.; Xia, H.; Zhou, L. Temperature sensitivity of total soil respiration and its heterotrophic and autotrophic components in six vegetation types of subtropical China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 607, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hummel, S. Understory development in young Cordia alliodora plantations. New For. 2000, 19, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Suchar, V.A.; Crookston, N.L. Understory cover and biomass indices predictions for forest ecosystems of the Northwestern United States. Ecol. Indic. 2010, 10, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, Z.W.; Chen, R.S.; Song, Y.X.; Han, C.T. Distribution and estimation of aboveground biomass of alpine shrubs along an altitudinal gradient in a small watershed of the Qilian Mountains, China. J. Mt. Sci. 2015, 12, 961–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Halpern, C.B.; Lutz, J.A. Canopy closure exerts weak controls on understory dynamics: A 30-year study of overstory-understory interactions. Ecol. Monogr. 2013, 83, 221–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, Y.; Kang, F.; Han, H.; Cheng, X.; Zhou, B.; Li, Y.; Liu, K.; Yin, X. Analysis on influence factors of undergrowth vegetation biomass in Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in Mount Taiyue. J. Central South Univ. For. Technol. 2015, 35, 104–108, 125, (In Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  49. Cheng, X.; Yu, M.; Wang, G.G.; Wu, T.; Zhang, C. Growth, morphology and biomass allocation in response to light gradient in five subtropical evergreen broadleaved tree seedlings. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2013, 25, 537–546. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hamelin, C.; Gagnon, D.; Truax, B. Aboveground biomass of Glossy Buckthorn is similar in open and understory environments but architectural strategy differs. Forests 2015, 6, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Y.; Zheng, S.; Gong, G.; Chen, J.; Tang, B.; Zhu, Z.; Wu, X.; Mu, C. Biomass and its allocation of undergrowth Vitex negundo L. in different age classes of mixed cypress forest. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2010, 30, 2809–2818, (In Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  52. Chen, F.; Luo, Y.; Li, Q. Allometric equations for estimating biomass of dominant shrub species in subtropical forests in eastern Guangdong Province, China. J. Central South Univ. For. Technol. 2013, 33, 5–11, (In Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  53. Limsuwan, S.; Trip, E.N.; Kouwen, T.R.; Piersma, S.; Hiranrat, A.; Mahabusarakam, W.; Voravuthikunchai, S.P.; van Dijl, J.M.; Kayser, O. Rhodomyrtone: A new candidate as natural antibacterial drug from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa. Phytomedicine 2009, 16, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dai, W.P.; Li, G.; Li, X.; Hu, Q.P.; Liu, J.X.; Zhang, F.X.; Su, Z.R.; Lai, X.P. The roots of Ilex asprella extract lessens acute respiratory distress syndrome in mice induced by influenza virus. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 155, 1575–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhou, T.; Zhang, W.; Fan, J.; Wang, H.; Ma, D.; Li, Q. Comparison on photosynthetic and fluorescence characteristics between one cultivar and one species in Gardenia. China For. Sci. Technol. 2015, 29, 18–23, (Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhu, X. Ecological Characteristics of Five Shrubs in Eucalyptus Urophylla Forest. Master’s Thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, May 2015; p. 26. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhu, X.; Liang, C.; Ca, X.; Fu, S.; Zhou, L. Soil microbial community characteristics of 5 tree species in Eucalyptus urophylla plantation. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2015, 24, 617–623, (Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  58. Liang, H.L.; Liu, H.N.; Yang, Q.H.; Huang, R.Z.; Wei, X.; Ye, W.H.; Luo, W.H.; Xiong, Z.C. Seed germination of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa. Seed Sci. Technol. 2013, 41, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, K.X.; Liang, X.J.; Wei, X.J.; Huang, J.; Liang, W.H. Research Progress on Baeckea frutesce. Guangxi For. Sci. 2013, 42, 38–42, (Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
Forests 08 00419 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of plantation type and stand age on the number of shrub species. NS, EU, AC, CH, M10 and M30 represent naturally recovered shrubland, Eucalyptus urophylla, Acacia crassicarpa, Castanopsis hystrix, 10-species mixed plantation and 30-species mixed plantation, respectively. The value is the average ± standard error, n = 3.
Figure 1. Effects of plantation type and stand age on the number of shrub species. NS, EU, AC, CH, M10 and M30 represent naturally recovered shrubland, Eucalyptus urophylla, Acacia crassicarpa, Castanopsis hystrix, 10-species mixed plantation and 30-species mixed plantation, respectively. The value is the average ± standard error, n = 3.
Forests 08 00419 g001
Forests 08 00419 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of plantation type and stand age on the total biomass of shrubs. The value is the average ± standard error, n = 3. For abbreviations, please see Figure 1.
Figure 2. Effects of plantation type and stand age on the total biomass of shrubs. The value is the average ± standard error, n = 3. For abbreviations, please see Figure 1.
Forests 08 00419 g002
Forests 08 00419 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of plantation type and stand age on the biomass of individual shrub species. (a) Rhodomyrtus tomentosa; (b) Ilex asprella; (c) Gardenia jasminoides; (d) Melastoma candidum; (e) Clerodendrum fortunatum and (f) Baeckea frutescens. The value is the average ± standard error, n = 3. For abbreviations, please see Figure 1.
Figure 3. Effects of plantation type and stand age on the biomass of individual shrub species. (a) Rhodomyrtus tomentosa; (b) Ilex asprella; (c) Gardenia jasminoides; (d) Melastoma candidum; (e) Clerodendrum fortunatum and (f) Baeckea frutescens. The value is the average ± standard error, n = 3. For abbreviations, please see Figure 1.
Forests 08 00419 g003
Table
Table 1. Average height of trees in six plantations (meter).
Table 1. Average height of trees in six plantations (meter).
PlantationsStand Age (Year)
146
NS1.20 ± 0.380.99 ± 0.121.05 ± 0.02
EU4.76 ± 0.2910.21 ± 1.1511.69 ± 1.03
AC2.58 ± 0.27.41 ± 0.339.15 ± 0.90
CH0.79 ± 0.013.97 ± 0.225.61 ± 0.09
M100.90 ± 0.062.81 ± 0.193.63 ± 0.32
M300.90 ± 0.102.94 ± 0.033.98 ± 0.03
Note: NS, EU, AC, CH, M10 and M30 indicate naturally recovered shrubland, Eucalyptus urophylla, Acacia crassicarpa, Castanopsis hystrix, 10-species mixed plantation and 30-species mixed plantation, respectively. The value is the average of three plots ± standard error, n = 3. An average of one plot is based on the average of all trees in the replicated plot.
Table
Table 2. Shrub species in six plantations.
Table 2. Shrub species in six plantations.
Species NamePlantations
NSEUACCHM10M30
Mallotus apelta√√√√√√
Ficus variolosa√○√○√√
Cassia alata○○○○○√
Rhaphiolepis indica√√√√√√
Baeckea frutescens√√√√√√
Clerodendrum fortunatum.√√√√√√
Breynia fruticosa√○√○√○
Symplocos chinensis○○○○○√
Gardenia jasminoides√√√√√√
Psychotria rubra○○○○○√
Phyllodium pulchellum○○√√○○
Wikstroemia indica√√√○√√
Glochidion eriocarpum○○√○○○
Ilex asprella√√√√√√
Eurya chinensis√√√√√√
Evodia lepta√√√√√○
Helicteres angustifolia√√√○√√
Garcinia oligantha○○○√○○
Glochidion puberum○○√○○√
Rhodomyrtus tomentosa√√√√√√
Ficus hirta√√√√√√
Glochidion zeylanicum√○○○○○
Melastoma candidum√√√√√√
Note: “√” and “○” indicate that the species are present or absent, respectively in this plantation regardless of stand age. For abbreviations, please see Table 1.
Table
Table 3. Effects of plantation type and stand age on the biomass of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, Ilex asprella, Gardenia jasminoides, Melastoma candidum, Clerodendrum fortunatum, and Baeckea frutescens.
Table 3. Effects of plantation type and stand age on the biomass of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, Ilex asprella, Gardenia jasminoides, Melastoma candidum, Clerodendrum fortunatum, and Baeckea frutescens.
Shrub SpeciesPTSAPT × SA
FPFPFP
Rhodomyrtus tomentosa2.6820.0322.7540.0531.1620.332
Ilex asprella2.5860.0393.1980.0320.4130.967
Gardenia jasminoides1.4790.2150.5350.6610.6820.789
Melastoma candidum1.6690.1603.2760.0291.1690.327
Clerodendrum fortunatum2.9100.0238.359<0.0011.4770.152
Baeckea frutescens5.537<0.0016.1880.0010.8750.594
Note: PT, plantation type; SA, stand age; PT × SA, interactions between plantation type and stand age. Results are from two-way factorial ANOVA. The factors used for the ANOVA were plantation type (levels: naturally recovered shrubland, Eucalyptus urophylla, Acacia crassicarpa, Castanopsis hystrix, 10-species mixed plantation and 30-species mixed plantation), and stand age (levels: 1, 3, 4 and 6 years old).
Table
Table 4. Density of shrub species (individuals per hectare).
Table 4. Density of shrub species (individuals per hectare).
Shrub SpeciesPlantationStand Age (Year)
1346
Rhodomyrtus tomentosaNS6853443737891991
EU465254160.41933151
AC9481775667704000
CH6104328125701526
M1014148820774152370
M3012207263740895015
Ilex asprellaNS189517316317
EU430489228489
AC415785533578
CH178156311193
M10267422230356
M30133178341193
Melastoma candidumNS789411415333
EU578444656575
AC741511919644
CH1096578756630
M103851415896548
M3018225701059578
Gardenia jasminoidesNS24498231206
EU415185156254
AC519593548526
CH897496207
M10222496215296
M30726267193400
Clerodendrum fortunatumNS345936931849289
EU60402159548800
AC5452394128071030
CH12415479324152000
M101062217853207711
M301161540962681852
Baeckea frutescensNS5933586754852133
EU307222441800565
AC173315931741156
CH927440372644222
M101324483567296748
M30924425411926333
Note: NS, EU, AC, CH, M10 and M30 indicate naturally recovered shrubland, Eucalyptus urophylla, Acacia crassicarpa, Castanopsis hystrix, 10-species mixed plantation and 30-species mixed plantation, respectively.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Cai, X.; Zhang, Y.; Rao, X.; Fu, S. Dynamics of Understory Shrub Biomass in Six Young Plantations of Southern Subtropical China. Forests 2017, 8, 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110419

AMA Style

Chen Y, Cai X, Zhang Y, Rao X, Fu S. Dynamics of Understory Shrub Biomass in Six Young Plantations of Southern Subtropical China. Forests. 2017; 8(11):419. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Yuanqi, Xi’an Cai, Yanju Zhang, Xingquan Rao, and Shenglei Fu. 2017. "Dynamics of Understory Shrub Biomass in Six Young Plantations of Southern Subtropical China" Forests 8, no. 11: 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110419

APA Style

Chen, Y., Cai, X., Zhang, Y., Rao, X., & Fu, S. (2017). Dynamics of Understory Shrub Biomass in Six Young Plantations of Southern Subtropical China. Forests, 8(11), 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop