Next Article in Journal
Resource Limitations Influence Growth and Vigor of Idaho Fescue, a Common Understory Species in Pacific Northwest Ponderosa Pine Forests
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantification of Phosphorus Exports from a Small Forested Headwater-Catchment in the Eastern Ore Mountains, Germany
Previous Article in Journal
Independent Effects of Invasive Shrubs and Deer Herbivory on Plant Community Dynamics
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Biodiversity Benefits and Opportunity Costs of Plantation Forest Management: A Modelling Case Study of Pinus radiata in New Zealand
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2017, 8(1), 5;

Influence of Forest Harvest on Nitrate Concentration in Temperate Streams—A Meta-Analysis

Biometry and Environmental System Analysis, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
Current address: Tennenbacherstr. 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Henning Meesenburg
Received: 18 October 2016 / Revised: 15 December 2016 / Accepted: 16 December 2016 / Published: 22 December 2016
Full-Text   |   PDF [286 KB, uploaded 22 December 2016]   |  


Forest harvest alters natural nutrient cycles, which is reflected in stream water run-off from harvested catchments. Nitrate is an essential nutrient for plant growth, but increased concentrations in rivers, lakes, and oceans have contributed to eutrophication and anoxic conditions. Based on a literature review, we assessed the impact of three different harvest methods—clearcut, patchcut, and selective harvest—on nitrate concentrations in temperate forest streams. In a meta-analysis, the influence of harvest methods and additional environmental variables was analysed. Nitrate concentrations are significantly influenced by harvest methods, forest composition, site altitude, and time passed after the harvesting. The remaining unexplained between-site variability is small compared to the between-site variability explained by the model, indicating the model’s validity. The effect of forest harvest is most pronounced in coniferous and deciduous forests, where clearcuts and patchcuts result in high nitrate run-off three to five years after harvest. Mixed forest plots can compensate for clearcut and patchcut, and do not show a significantly increased nitrate concentration after harvest. Selective harvest at low intensities succeeded in maintaining nitrate levels similar to control or pre-harvest levels in coniferous and mixed forests, and showed a positive but not significant trend in deciduous forests. Coniferous and deciduous monocultures clearly face the problem that nitrate wash-out cannot be minimized by reducing clearcut to patchcut harvest, whereas mixed forests are more suitable to diminish nitrate wash-out in both clearcut and patchcut. View Full-Text
Keywords: forest management; water quality; nitrogen; water chemistry forest management; water quality; nitrogen; water chemistry

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary materials


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Mupepele, A.-C.; Dormann, C.F. Influence of Forest Harvest on Nitrate Concentration in Temperate Streams—A Meta-Analysis. Forests 2017, 8, 5.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top