Next Article in Journal
Correction: Trishkin, M., et al. Assessment of a Company’s Due Diligence System against the EU Timber Regulation: A Case Study from Northwestern Russia. Forests 2015, 6, 1380–1396
Next Article in Special Issue
Detecting Local Drivers of Fire Cycle Heterogeneity in Boreal Forests: A Scale Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Regional Differences in Upland Forest to Developed (Urban) Land Cover Conversions in the Conterminous U.S., 1973–2011
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Variability of Wildland Fuels in US Northern Rocky Mountain Forests
Open AccessArticle

Quantifying Fire Cycle from Dendroecological Records Using Survival Analyses

1
Canadian Forest Service-Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec, QC G1V 4C7, Canada
2
Forest Research Institute, Industrial Chair NSERC-UQAT-UQAM in Sustainable Forest Management, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, QC J9X 5E4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Eric J. Jokela
Forests 2016, 7(7), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/f7070131
Received: 12 May 2016 / Accepted: 16 June 2016 / Published: 28 June 2016
Quantifying fire regimes in the boreal forest ecosystem is crucial for understanding the past and present dynamics, as well as for predicting its future dynamics. Survival analyses have often been used to estimate the fire cycle in eastern Canada because they make it possible to take into account the censored information that is made prevalent by the typically long fire return intervals and the limited scope of the dendroecological methods that are used to quantify them. Here, we assess how the true length of the fire cycle, the short-term temporal variations in fire activity, and the sampling effort affect the accuracy and precision of estimates obtained from two types of parametric survival models, the Weibull and the exponential models, and one non-parametric model obtained with the Cox regression. Then, we apply those results in a case area located in eastern Canada. Our simulation experiment confirms some documented concerns regarding the detrimental effects of temporal variations in fire activity on parametric estimation of the fire cycle. Cox regressions appear to provide the most accurate and robust estimator, being by far the least affected by temporal variations in fire activity. The Cox-based estimate of the fire cycle for the last 300 years in the case study area is 229 years (CI95: 162–407), compared with the likely overestimated 319 years obtained with the commonly used exponential model. View Full-Text
Keywords: accuracy; boreal forest; coverage; Cox regression; dendrochronology; exponential; fire cycle; precision; survival analyses; time since fire; Weibull accuracy; boreal forest; coverage; Cox regression; dendrochronology; exponential; fire cycle; precision; survival analyses; time since fire; Weibull
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Cyr, D.; Gauthier, S.; Boulanger, Y.; Bergeron, Y. Quantifying Fire Cycle from Dendroecological Records Using Survival Analyses. Forests 2016, 7, 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7070131

AMA Style

Cyr D, Gauthier S, Boulanger Y, Bergeron Y. Quantifying Fire Cycle from Dendroecological Records Using Survival Analyses. Forests. 2016; 7(7):131. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7070131

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cyr, Dominic; Gauthier, Sylvie; Boulanger, Yan; Bergeron, Yves. 2016. "Quantifying Fire Cycle from Dendroecological Records Using Survival Analyses" Forests 7, no. 7: 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7070131

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop