Next Article in Journal
Structure and Regeneration Patterns of Pinus nigra subsp. salzmannii Natural Forests: A Basic Knowledge for Adaptive Management in a Changing Climate
Next Article in Special Issue
Road Expansion and Its Influence on Trail Sustainability in Bhutan
Previous Article in Journal
Understory Light Conditions Associated with Partial Overstory Removal and Midstory/Understory Control Applications in a Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Previous Article in Special Issue
Best Practices for Tourism Concessions in Protected Areas: A Review of the Field
Open AccessArticle

An Ecosystem Approach to Recreation Location Quotients

Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, 115 Green Hall, 1530 Cleveland Ave. N., St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
Center for Changing Landscapes, University of Minnesota, 151 Rapson Hall, 89 Church St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2011, 2(4), 993-1012;
Received: 31 August 2011 / Revised: 11 November 2011 / Accepted: 28 November 2011 / Published: 2 December 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Expanding Forests’ Benefits: Forest-based Recreation and Tourism)
Despite the widespread agreement on the importance of preserving ecological integrity in conservation and outdoor recreation decision-making processes, traditional metrics analyzing the supply of and demand for conservation and recreation resources have focused on geographical and population-centric units of measurement rather than ecological ones. One tool past researchers have used to inform recreation resource planning is the recreation location quotient (RLQ). While simple park-to-population ratios or acres-per-capita metrics provide a base measure of carrying capacity and are often useful to set broad recreation supply standards, the RLQ offers a more nuanced snapshot of supply and demand by comparing regional ratios to a standardized reference region. The RLQ is thus able to provide a statistic or quotient that highlights regions where recreation resources are particularly abundant and/or scarce relative to a reference area. This project expands the past RLQ analyses by investigating the distribution of recreation resources across the 10 ecological sections found within the US state of Minnesota. RLQs were calculated using recreation trail mileage, natural resource and recreation area acreage data, and recreation facility data from federal, state, and local agencies. Results found notable differences in supply of recreation resources across ecological sections. Some sections were considerably underrepresented in recreation resources-per area (e.g., Red River Valley and North Central Glaciated Plains) while others were underrepresented in recreation resources-per capita (e.g., Minnesota and Northeast Iowa Morainal). The RLQ statistics and resulting maps illustrating relative surplus or deficiencies can inform future land acquisition decisions and highlight the need for cross-jurisdictional planning in order to ensure outdoor recreation systems are ecologically representative. Possible implications and recommendations for future planning decisions are discussed. View Full-Text
Keywords: recreation management; recreation resource inventory; geo-spatial analysis; ecosystem management recreation management; recreation resource inventory; geo-spatial analysis; ecosystem management
Show Figures

MDPI and ACS Style

Oftedal, A.; Davenport, M.; Schneider, I.E.; Zerger, C.; Schreurs, B.; Vogel, M. An Ecosystem Approach to Recreation Location Quotients. Forests 2011, 2, 993-1012.

AMA Style

Oftedal A, Davenport M, Schneider IE, Zerger C, Schreurs B, Vogel M. An Ecosystem Approach to Recreation Location Quotients. Forests. 2011; 2(4):993-1012.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oftedal, Andrew; Davenport, Mae; Schneider, Ingrid E.; Zerger, Cindy; Schreurs, Brian; Vogel, Mary. 2011. "An Ecosystem Approach to Recreation Location Quotients" Forests 2, no. 4: 993-1012.

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop