Next Article in Journal
Maxent Modeling for Identifying the Nature Reserve of Cistanche deserticola Ma under Effects of the Host (Haloxylon Bunge) Forest and Climate Changes in Xinjiang, China
Previous Article in Journal
Burning Characteristics of Ancient Wood from Traditional Buildings in Shanxi Province, China
Article

Case Studies of the Financial Performance of Silvopastoral Systems in Southern Queensland, Australia

by 1,*, 1, 2,3 and 2,3,4
1
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4072, Australia
2
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Agri-Science Queensland, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast 4556, Australia
3
Forest Research Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast 4556, Australia
4
Department of Plant Pathology, The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 3261, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Luis Diaz-Balteiro
Forests 2022, 13(2), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020186
Received: 5 December 2021 / Revised: 6 January 2022 / Accepted: 7 January 2022 / Published: 26 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Economics, Policy, and Social Science)
There is considerable uncertainty surrounding the future availability of hardwood timber from state-owned native forests in southern Queensland. The timber industry is becoming increasingly reliant on private native forests, where much is on properties primarily managed for beef cattle grazing. Historically, these forests have been periodically high-grade harvested without silvicultural treatment or cleared to increase pasture production where landholders have the right to do so. This study compares these traditional forest management practices at four case study properties against silvopastoral system alternatives. Merchantable timber, pasture and cattle production was estimated for each management scenario with a native forest silvicultural treatment response model. The net present value of each scenario was estimated over a 20-year management period. For all case study properties, the worst-performing forest management scenario was to clear forest for grazing. Investment in silvopastoral systems in southern Queensland was found to be financially attractive, particularly when silvicultural treatments were implemented in year zero to increase timber production. Silvicultural treatments increased the mean annual increment of merchantable timber over 20 years by an average of 1.3 m3/ha/year relative to the scenario where no management was performed in year zero. Forest management scenarios with silvicultural treatments had better financial performance than scenarios without silvicultural treatment. However, long payback periods and sovereign risk are serious impediments to silvopastoral system adoption in southern Queensland. If these concerns can be overcome, private native forests have the potential to be sustainably managed to improve the financial performance of farms, improve regional employment and income generation, supply Queensland’s future hardwood timber needs, and increase carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation on private land. View Full-Text
Keywords: livestock; agroforestry; timber production; forest management; silvicultural treatment; pasture livestock; agroforestry; timber production; forest management; silvicultural treatment; pasture
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Francis, B.; Venn, T.; Lewis, T.; Brawner, J. Case Studies of the Financial Performance of Silvopastoral Systems in Southern Queensland, Australia. Forests 2022, 13, 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020186

AMA Style

Francis B, Venn T, Lewis T, Brawner J. Case Studies of the Financial Performance of Silvopastoral Systems in Southern Queensland, Australia. Forests. 2022; 13(2):186. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020186

Chicago/Turabian Style

Francis, Ben, Tyron Venn, Tom Lewis, and Jeremy Brawner. 2022. "Case Studies of the Financial Performance of Silvopastoral Systems in Southern Queensland, Australia" Forests 13, no. 2: 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020186

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop