Next Article in Journal
Biological Legacies and Rockfall: The Protective Effect of a Windthrown Forest
Next Article in Special Issue
Resilience as a Moving Target: An Evaluation of Last Century Management Strategies in a Dry-Edge Maritime Pine Ecosystem
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential Distribution of Juniperus rigida Sieb. et Zucc. Vary Diversely in China under the Stringent and High GHG Emission Scenarios Combined Bioclimatic, Soil, and Topographic Factors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Forest Management Evaluation Using Carbon Credits: From Production to Environmental Forests
 
 
Article

Winners and Losers in Energy Transition: Study Case of Wood Biomass Power-Plants Implementation in France

1
Ecologie-Systématique-Evolution Lab (UMR 8079), Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France
2
Cultures-Environnements-Arctique-Représentations-Climat Lab (CEARC), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78280 Guyancourt, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Guangyu Wang
Forests 2021, 12(9), 1139; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091139
Received: 24 June 2021 / Revised: 27 July 2021 / Accepted: 22 August 2021 / Published: 24 August 2021
International policies promote renewable forms of energy to mitigate climate change. In Europe, the production of electricity using wood biomass represents one of the most popular energy alternatives. In 2012, France initiated a large-scale strategy to develop wood biomass energy. The biggest wood biomass power-plant project has been developed in the French Mediterranean area and its huge size raises several issues for the short- and long-term sustainability of local forests and associated economic sectors. The French Mediterranean forests provide four types of economic goods (private, club, common, and public goods) and multiple ecosystem services, which makes them complex to manage under an energy transition policy. In this paper, we applied three qualitative methods, namely interviews, participative workshops, and observant participation, and three conceptual models, namely (i) Ostrom’s (2010) self-organization key conditions, (ii) the types of economic goods classified according to their excludability and rivalry properties, and (iii) the ecosystem service categorization system of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). With our methods, we show that the renewable strategy chosen in France replicates the current centralized production model based on fossil and nuclear fuels. Thus, we demonstrate that European, national, and local authorities fail to consider the multiple ecosystem services that forest management strategies should include to face the energy transition, climate change, and the other ecological challenges of the 21st century. View Full-Text
Keywords: common-pool resource management; local vs. global; economic oligopoly; panacea paradigm; renewable energy; sectoral organization common-pool resource management; local vs. global; economic oligopoly; panacea paradigm; renewable energy; sectoral organization
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sansilvestri, R.; Cordier, M.; Lescuyer, T. Winners and Losers in Energy Transition: Study Case of Wood Biomass Power-Plants Implementation in France. Forests 2021, 12, 1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091139

AMA Style

Sansilvestri R, Cordier M, Lescuyer T. Winners and Losers in Energy Transition: Study Case of Wood Biomass Power-Plants Implementation in France. Forests. 2021; 12(9):1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sansilvestri, Roxane, Mateo Cordier, and Thibault Lescuyer. 2021. "Winners and Losers in Energy Transition: Study Case of Wood Biomass Power-Plants Implementation in France" Forests 12, no. 9: 1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091139

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop