Climate Change Governance in Forestry and Nature Conservation in Selected Forest Regions in Serbia: Stakeholders Classification and Collaboration
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Analytical Framework
2.1. Stakeholder Analysis (SA)
2.2. Social Network Analysis (SNA)
2.3. Combining SA and SNA
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Defining Respondents
3.2. Data Collection
- Q19: Please specify stakeholders (individuals, institutions, organizations, state enterprises, civil associations, NGO’s and others) performing work and/or activities or on any other way are achieving their interests in forestry and nature protection.
- Q20: Were any of specified stakeholders, involved in the climate change governance (Y/N).If the answer is yes, please indicated how.
- Q21: Please indicate other stakeholders, involved in the climate change governance and indicate interest and (perceived) influence of all specified stakeholders.
- Q23: Please specify with which stakeholder(s) performing work and/or activities in forestry and nature protection you collaborate with concerning climate change governance related issues.
- Q23(a): Please specify areas for the collaboration in climate change governance (open question).
- Q23(b): Please specify how often you are in contact in relation to mentioned areas of the collaboration.
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Analysis of Collaboration Network
4.2. SNA per Areas for the Collaboration
- Remediation of forest damages from ice breaks, floods, and fires (Area 1);
- Workshops, seminars and expert knowledge exchange (Area 2);
- Tree planting, waste disposal and green space maintenance (Area 3);
- Project-related activities (Area 4);
- Climate-related data information exchange (Area 5);
- Information exchange with emergency management departments and divisions (Area 6);
- Information exchange concerning environmental monitoring and precaution (Area 7).
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Abbrev. | Specified Stakeholders | Climate Change Competency |
---|---|---|
PUBLIC SECTOR | ||
Public Administration and Local Self-Government | ||
MEP | Ministry of Environmental Protection Sector for environmental governance Sector for environmental monitoring and precaution Sector for nature conservation and climate change | Harmonization and/or development of strategies, policies, and laws for environmental protection, nature, climate change, and other related activities |
MAFWM-DF | Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management—Directorate of Forests | Harmonization and/or development of forestry strategies, policies, and laws with the strategy of adaptation to climate change |
MME | Ministry of Mining and Energy Sector for energy efficiency and renewable resources | Adaptation and/or development of strategies, policies, and laws of energy, climate change, and the use of renewable energy resources (RES) |
MI | Ministry of Interior Sector for emergency management | Organizing and implementing measures for the protection and rescue of people, material and cultural goods, and the environment from natural disasters |
CG | City administration government Departments, divisions, and services for environmental protection Departments, divisions, and services for environmental control and inspection | Development and preparation of local action plans for environmental protection, nature conservation activities, environmental inspection |
MG | Municipal administration government Departments and divisions for environmental protection Departments, division, and services for environmental control and inspection Departments and division for economic development | Preparation and implementation of local action plans for environmental protection, provision of control and inspection of environmental protection |
DDEM | City departments and municipal divisions for emergency management | Management and coordination of measures for protection and rescue of people, material and cultural goods and the environment from natural disasters, |
VC | Village communities | Implementation of actions and programs for environmental protection |
Public institutions and services | ||
Agencies and Institutes | ||
INCS | Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia | Monitoring the state of biodiversity, providing guidelines for sustainable management of protected areas, application of international conventions, research work |
CIPH | City Institutes for Public Health | Preparation, planning and implementation of programs for monitoring the state and preservation of the environment; identification and implementation of measures in natural and other major disasters and emergencies; |
Education and research organizations (faculties, schools and institutes) | ||
UB-FF | University of Belgrade—Forestry Faculty | Research work, education and education in forestry-related to climate change |
IF | Institute of Forestry, Belgrade | Research work in forestry, nature conservation, environment, etc. concerning climate change |
UB-FB | University of Belgrade—Faculty of Biology | Research, education and education in the environment and nature conservation about climate change |
PSS | Primary and Secondary Schools | Education and education on environmental protection, nature conservation in connection with climate change |
Public Enterprises (PE) | ||
PE for state forest management | ||
PESŠ | PE “Srbijašume”—forest estates and forest management units | Sustainable forest management, research on forest management and the impact of climate change |
PE National Parks (NP) | ||
PE NP | PE “NP Tara”, Bajina Bašta; PE “NP Kopaonik”, Kopaonik; JPE “NP Đerdap”, Donji Milanovac. | Protected area governance, the impact of climate change on protected areas |
Other PE | ||
PEES | PE “Elektroprivreda Srbije” branch HE “Đerdap”, Kladovo; branch Drinsko-Limske HE, Bajina Bašta | Transmission and distribution of electricity, acceptance of the flood wave, measures to improve the efficient use of water resources |
PWESV | PWE “Srbijavode”, Belgrade | Regulation of watercourses and protection against the harmful effects of water, implementation of flood defenses, execution of measures and works for protection against torrents |
PUEGRE | PUE for Greenery | Landscaping and maintenance of green public areas, landscaping and maintenance of the environment, waste management |
PUEH | PUE for Heating | Transmission and distribution of electricity and heat, gas, measures to improve the efficient use of energy resources, including RES |
Abbrev. | Specified Stakeholders | Climate Change Competencies |
---|---|---|
CIVIL AND PRIVATE SECTOR | ||
Nongovernmental Organizations and Citizens Associations | ||
Nongovernmental Organizations (NGO) | ||
Environmental NGO | ||
NGOGOR | NGO “Pokret Gorana Srbije” | Afforestation, landscaping activities, educational work with youth on improving the environment and raising environmental awareness, including the issue of climate change |
NGO | Local environmental NGO | Raising public awareness on nature conservation, environmental protection about climate change |
NGOKNJ | Timočki klub, Knjaževac | Raising public awareness on nature conservation, environmental protection concerning climate change |
Humanitarian NGO | ||
Citizens Associations | ||
Business and Professional Associations | ||
HA | Hunting Associations | Protection and hunting of wild animals, gathering, organizing and implementing activities of all citizens interested in the conservation of nature, flora and fauna, as well as ecological protection of the natural environment |
MA | Mountaineering Associations | Sport manifestations, information exchange and awareness raise on environmental protection and climate change |
PRIVATE SECTOR | ||
APFO | Associations of Private Forest Owners | Encouraging the exchange of information and implementation of projects related to sustainable forest management, |
PFO | Private Forest Owners | Use of forests |
Abbrev. | Name of Institution/Organization | Abbrev. | Name of Institution/Organization |
---|---|---|---|
PUBLIC SECTOR | |||
Public Administration and Local Self-Government | |||
MEPENV | Ministry of Environmental Protection—Sector for environmental governance | MAFWM-DF | Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management—Directorate of Forests |
MEPINSP | Ministry of Environmental Protection—Sector for environmental monitoring and precaution | MME | Ministry of Mining and Energy |
MI | Ministry of Interior—Sector for Emergency Management | MYS | Ministry of Youth and Sport |
LMKV | City administration Kraljevo | LMKU | Municipal administration Kučevo |
LMLE | City administration Leskovac | LMGO1 | Municipal administration Golubac |
LMNIŠ | City administration Niš | LMGO2 | Municipal administration Golubac |
LMPI | City administration Pirot | LMŠA | Municipal administration Šabac |
LMKŠ | City administration Kruševac | LMVA | Municipal administration Valjevo |
LMSB | Municipal administration Sokobanja | LMLJIG | Municipal administration Ljig |
LMZA | Municipal administration Zaječar | LMMAJD | Municipal administration Majdanpek |
LMNE | Municipal administration Negotin | LMBOR | Municipal administration Bor |
LMDMIL1 | Municipal administration Majdanpek | LMAL | Municipal administration Aleksinac |
LMDMIL2 | Municipal administration Majdanpek | LMKNJ | Municipal administration Knjaževac |
LMRAŠKA | Municipal administration Raška | LMSVRLJ | Municipal administration Svrljig |
LMPB | Municipal administration Priboj | LMMEROŠ | Municipal administration Merošina |
LMBB | Municipal administration Bajina Bašta | LMKURŠ | Municipal administration Kuršumlija |
LMLO | Municipal administration Loznica | LMRAŽ | Municipal administration Ražanj |
LMKR | Municipal administration Krupanj | LSBOLJ | Municipal administration Boljevac |
LMIV | Municipal administration Ivanjica | LMPR | Municipal administration Prijepolje |
LMVB | Municipal administration Vrnjačka Banja | LMŽAG | Municipal administration Žagubica |
DDEM | City dep. and municipal for emergency management divisions | ||
Public institutions and services | |||
Agencies and Institutes | |||
INCS | Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia | EPA | Environmental Protection Agency |
Education and research organizations (faculties, schools and institutes) | |||
UB-FF | University of Belgrade—Forestry Faculty | IF | Institute of Forestry, Belgrade |
PSS | Primary and Secondary Schools | ||
Other institutions and services | |||
TO | Touristic organizations of local government units | ||
Public Enterprises (PE) | |||
PE for state forest management | |||
PESŠ | PE “Srbijašume” | ||
PE “Srbijašume”—Forest Estates (FE) | |||
FEKŠ | PE “Srbijašume”—FE Rasina | FEKURŠ1 | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Toplica” |
FEKURŠ2 | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Toplica” | FEIV1 | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Golija” |
FENI | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Niš” | FELE | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Šuma” |
FEBOLJ | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Timočke šume” | FEKU | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Severni Kučaj” |
FEPR | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Prijepolje” | FEPI | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Pirot” |
FELO | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Boranja” | FEKV | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Stolovi” |
PE “Srbijašume”—Forest Management Units (FMU) | |||
FMURAŽ | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Rasina”—FMU Ražanj | FMUKR | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Boranja”—FMU “Krupanj” |
FMUBOLJ | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Timočke šume”—FMU Boljevac | FMUIV2 | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Golija”—FMU “Ivanjica” |
FMUSB | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Niš”—FMU Sokobanja | FMUIV3 | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Golija”—FMU “Devići” |
FMUAL | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Niš”—FMU Aleksinac | FMUPK | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Toplica”—FMU “Prokuplje” |
FMUKNJ | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Timočke šume”—FMU “Knjaževac” | FMUKU | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Severni Kučaj”—FMU “Kučevo” |
FMUNI | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Niš”—FMU “Niš-Bačka Palanka” | FMUŠA | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Boranja”—FMU “Šabac” |
FMUZA | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Timočke šume”—FMU “Zaječar” | FMUVA | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Boranja”—FMU “Valjevo” |
FMUBOR | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Timočke šume”—FMU “Bor“ | FMUPI | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Pirot”—FMU “Pirot” |
FMUDMIL | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Timočke šume”—ŠU “Donji Milanovac” | FMUMAJD | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Severni Kučaj”—FMU “Majdanpek” |
FMUPB | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Prijepolje”—ŠU “Priboj” | FMUŽAG | PE “Srbijašume”—FE “Severni Kučaj”—FMU “Žagubica” |
PE for management of protective forests | |||
PEGOČ1 | PE for management of protective forests of Vrnjačka Banja “Šume—Goč” | PEGOČ2 | PE for management of protective forests of Vrnjačka Banja “Šume—Goč” |
PE National Parks (NP) | |||
PENPT1, | PE “NP Tara”, Bajina Bašta | PENPĐER | PE “NP Đerdap”, Donji Milanovac. |
PENPT2 | PE “NP Tara”, Bajina Bašta | PENPT13 | PE “NP Tara”, Bajina Bašta |
PENPK1 | PE “NP Kopaonik”, Kopaonik | PENPK2 | PE “NP Kopaonik”, Kopaonik |
Other PE | |||
PEES | PE “Elektroprivreda Srbije“ branch HE “Đerdap”, Kladovo; branch Drinsko-Limske HE, Bajina Bašta | PUEGRE | PUE for Greenery |
PERS | PE “Putevi Srbije”, Belgrade | PUEH | PUE for Heating |
PWESV | PWE “Srbijavode”, Belgrade |
Abbrev. | Name of Institution/Organization | Abbrev. | Name of Institution/Organization |
---|---|---|---|
CIVIL AND PRIVATE SECTOR | |||
Nongovernmental Organizations and Citizens Associations | |||
Nongovernmental Organizations (NGO) | |||
International NGO | |||
WWF | World Wide Fund for Nature Adria-Serbia, Belgrade | REC | Office of Regional environmental center for Central and Eastern Europe, Belgrade |
Environmental NGO | |||
NGO GOR | NGO “Pokret Gorana Srbije” | NGONIŠ2 | NGO “Razvojni centar” |
NGONI1 | NGO “Zeleni ključ”, Niš | NGOSVRLJ | Woman association “ETNO forum” |
NGOKNJ | NGO “Timočki klub”, Knjaževac | NGOKURŠ | NGO “Sektor za razvoj i saradnju regiona” |
NGONI2 | NGO “Protekta”, Niš | NGOPK | NGO “Pozitivni društveni faktor” |
NGORAŠ | NGO “Zeleni putokaz”, Raška | NGOPI | NGO “GEA” |
NGOKV1 | NGO “Bennem”, Kraljevo | NGOKŠ | NGO “Treehouse” |
NGOKV2 | NGO “Klasična tradicija”, Kraljevo | NGOPB | NGO “Argument” |
NGOLE1 | Youth association “Logos” | NGOPR | NGO “Ožalj” |
NGOLE2 | Development center “Mreža” | NGOMAJD | NGO “Majdan-eko” |
NGOKU | NGO “Entuzijasti Kučeva” | NGOLJIG | NGO “Seoski turizam Srbije” |
NGOGO | Association “Ekopek” | NGOBOR | NGO “Eko-klub” |
NGOŠA | NGO “Ekos” | NGOZAJ | Timočki youth center |
NGOVA | Ecological association Gradac | NGODMIL | NGO “Lazarus” |
NGOLO | NGO “Razvoj sela” | NGOSB | NGO “Sokobanjsko ekološko društvo” |
Humanitarian NGO | |||
RSHC | Russian Serbian Humanitarian Center | ||
Organizations for Advocacy and Public Policy | |||
SCTM | Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities | ||
Citizens Associations | |||
Business and Professional Associations | |||
HA | Hunting Associations | FA | Fishing Associations |
Associations of Private Forest Owners | |||
PRIVATE SECTOR | |||
APFO | Associations of Private Forest Owners |
Collaboration Area | Entire Network | Area 1 | Area 2 | Area 3 | Area 4 | Area 5 | Area 6 | Area 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governance Level | Central Node Affiliation (%) | |||||||
National | 30 | 20 | 18 | / | 24 | 28 | 25 | 50 |
Regional | 27.5 | 30 | 52 | 20 | 11 | 33 | / | / |
Local | 42.5 | 50 | 30 | 80 | 65 | 39 | 75 | 50 |
References
- IPCC. Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems; Shukla, P.R., Skea, J., Buendia, E.C., Masson-Delmotte, V., Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D.C., Zhai, P., Slade, R., Connors, S., Diemen, R., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Rajapaksa, D.; Islam, M.; Managi, S. Natural capital depletion: The impact of natural disasters on inclusive growth. Econ. Disasters Clim. Chang. 2017, 1, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Managi, S.; Guan, D. Multiple disasters management: Lessons from the Fukushima triple events. Econ. Anal. Policy 2017, 53, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- González-De Vega, S.; De las Heras, J.; Moya, D. Resilience of mediterranean terrestrial ecosystems and fire severity in Semiarid areas: Responses of Aleppo Pine forests in the short, mid and long term. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 573, 1171–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joint Research Centre, European Commission. Forest Fire Danger Extremes in Europe under Climate Change: Variability and Uncertainty; Publications Office: Luxembourg, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- García-Llamas, P.; Suárez-Seoane, S.; Taboada, A.; Fernández-Manso, A.; Quintano, C.; Fernández-García, V.; Fernández-Guisuraga, J.M.; Marcos, E.; Calvo, L. Environmental drivers of fire severity in extreme fire events that affect Mediterranean Pine forest ecosystems. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 433, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koutsias, N.; Arianoutsou, M.; Kallimanis, A.S.; Mallinis, G.; Halley, J.M.; Dimopoulos, P. Where did the fires burn in Peloponnisos, Greece the summer of 2007? Evidence for a synergy of fuel and weather. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2012, 156, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- San-Miguel-Ayanz, J.; Moreno, J.M.; Camia, A. Analysis of large fires in European Mediterranean landscapes: Lessons learned and perspectives. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 294, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turco, M.; von Hardenberg, J.; AghaKouchak, A.; Llasat, M.C.; Provenzale, A.; Trigo, R.M. On the key role of droughts in the dynamics of summer fires in Mediterranean Europe. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Aleksić, P.; Krstić, M.; Jančić, G. Forest fires—Ecological and economic problem in Serbia. Bot. Serbica 1999, 33, 169–176. [Google Scholar]
- Rankovic, N.; Poduska, Z.; Nedeljkovic, J.; Nonic, D. Influence of temperature and rainfalls on the number of visitors in the National Park “Tara”. Glas. Sumar. Fak. 2015, 112, 97–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rankovic, N.; Nedeljkovic, J.; Zlatic, M.; Stanisic, M.; Nonic, D. Trends in the extent of damages from natural hazards in forests in Serbia and the influence of temperature and precipitation. Glas. Sumar. Fak. 2016, 114, 201–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rankovic, N.; Stanisic, M.; Nedeljkovic, J.; Nonic, D. Damage trends in selected forest regions and a future period forecast. Glas. Sumar. Fak. 2019, 119, 189–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hallegatte, S.; Maskrey, A.; Oki, T.; Oswald-Spring, U.; Wilbanks, T.; Zebhe Yanda, P. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Field, C.B., Barros, V., Stocker, T.F., Dahe, Q., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fröhlich, J.; Knieling, J. Conceptualising climate change governance. In Climate Change Governance; Knieling, J., Leal Filho, W., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 9–26. ISBN 978-3-642-29831-8. [Google Scholar]
- Blomquist, W. Multi-level governance and natural resource management: The challenges of complexity, diversity, and uncertainty. In Institutions and Sustainability; Beckmann, V., Padmanabhan, M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 109–126. [Google Scholar]
- Lockwood, M.; Davidson, J.; Curtis, A.; Stratford, E.; Griffith, R. Multi-level environmental governance: Lessons from Australian natural resource management. Aust. Geogr. 2009, 40, 169–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johansson, J. Collaborative governance for sustainable forestry in the emerging bio-based economy in Europe. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2018, 32, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Gregorio, M.; Fatorelli, L.; Paavola, J.; Locatelli, B.; Pramova, E.; Nurrochmat, D.R.; May, P.H.; Brockhaus, M.; Sari, I.M.; Kusumadewi, S.D. Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2019, 54, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhodes, R.A.W. Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organ. Stud. 2007, 28, 1243–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pahl-Wostl, C. A Conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2009, 19, 354–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klijn, E.-H.; Koppenjan, J. Governance network theory: Past, present and future. Policy Politics 2012, 40, 587–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action; Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graham, J.; Amos, B.; Plumptre, T. Governance Principles for Protected Areas in the 21st Century: A Discussion Paper; Institute on Governance: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2003; 50p. [Google Scholar]
- Böhling, K.; Arzberger, M.B. New modes of governance in Bavaria’s Alpine forests: The ‘mountain forest initiative’ at work. For. Policy Econ. 2014, 49, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansell, C.; Gash, A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2007, 18, 543–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Jones, C.; Hesterly, W.S.; Borgatti, S.P. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1997, 22, 911–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Bogason, P.; Musso, J.A. The democratic prospects of network governance. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 2006, 36, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newig, J.; Günther, D.; Pahl-Wostl, C. Synapses in the network: Learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. E&S 2010, 15, art24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marks, G. Structural policy and multilevel governance in the EC. In The State of the European Community; Cafruny, A., Rosenthal, G., Eds.; Longman: Harlow, UK, 1993; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- Bache, I.; Flinders, M. Multi-Level Governance; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernstein, S.; Cashore, B. Examination of the influences of global forest governance arrangements at the domestic level. In Embracing Complexity: Meeting the Challenges of International Forest Governance; IUFRO World Series 28; Rayner, J., Buck, A., Katila, P., Eds.; IUFRO Secretariat: Vienna, Austria, 2010; pp. 111–135. [Google Scholar]
- Pezdevšek Malovrh, Š.; Paletto, A.; Posavec, S.; Dobšinská, Z.; Đorđević, I.; Marić, B.; Avdibegović, M.; Kitchoukov, E.; Stijović, A.; Trajkov, P.; et al. Evaluation of the operational environment factors of nature conservation policy implementation: Cases of selected EU and non-EU countries. Forests 2019, 10, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Neil Adger, W.; Arnell, N.W.; Tompkins, E.L. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2005, 15, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pülzl, H.; Dominguez, G. Interrelations of actors and organisations in the European Union and Pan-Europe with regards to forest policy-making. In European Forest Governance: Issues at Stake and the Way Forward; EFI Series: What Science Can Tell Us 2; Pülzl, H., Hogl, K., Kleinschmit, D., Wydra, D., Arts, B., Mayer, P., Palahi, M., Winkel, G., Wolfslehner, B., Eds.; European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland, 2013; pp. 64–74. [Google Scholar]
- Kleinschmit, D.; Edwards, P. Pan-European forest-focused and forest related policies. In European Forest Governance: Issues at Stake and the Way Forward; EFI Series: What Science Can Tell Us 2; Pülzl, H., Hogl, K., Kleinschmit, D., Wydra, D., Arts, B., Mayer, P., Palahi, M., Winkel, G., Wolfslehner, B., Eds.; European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland, 2013; pp. 45–51. [Google Scholar]
- Mostert, E. Who should do what in environmental management? Twelve principles for allocating responsibilities. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 45, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Fliervoet, J.M.; Geerling, G.W.; Mostert, E.; Smits, A.J.M. Analyzing collaborative governance through social network analysis: A case study of river management along the Waal river in The Netherlands. Environ. Manag. 2016, 57, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Meadowcroft, J. Climate Change Governance; Policy Research Working Papers; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Keskitalo, E.C.H. Introduction: Adaptation to climate change in Europe: Theoretical framework and study design. In Developing Adaptation Policy and Practice in Europe: Multi-Level Governance of Climate Change; Keskitalo, H.E.C., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 1–38. [Google Scholar]
- Nedeljković, J.; Stanišić, M. Forest and climate change governance. In Climate Action; Leal Filho, W., Azeiteiro, U., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P.G., Wall, T., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ostrom, E. A Multi-scale approach to coping with climate change and other collective action problems. Solutions 2010, 1, 27–36. [Google Scholar]
- Corfee-Morlot, J.; Kamal-Chaoui, L.; Donovan, M.G.; Cochran, I.; Robert, A.; Teasdale, P.J. Cities, Climate Change and Multilevel Governance; OECD Environment Working Papers; OECD: Paris, France, 2009; p. 125. [Google Scholar]
- Gudurić, I. The Perception of Decision-Makers to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban and Periurban Forests of Belgrade. Master’s Thesis, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Nonic, D.; Stanisic, M.; Nedeljkovic, J.; Rankovic, N. Cooperation in the climate change mitigation in forestry and nature protection at different levels of governance. Glas. Sumar. Fak. 2017, 116, 99–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Nedeljković, J.; Pezdevšek Malovrh, Š.; Curman, M.; Avdibegović, M.; Nonić, D.; Stanišić, M. Climate change governance in forestry and nature conservation: Institutional framework in selected see countries. Sumar. List 2019, 143, 445–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutabdžija, S. Defining the Set of Forest Governance Principles in Forestry Sector of the Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Forestry of the University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Louman, B.; Keenan, R.J.; Kleinschmit, D.; Atmadja, S.; Sitoe, A.A.; Nhantumbo, I.; Velozo, R.d.C.; Morales, J.P. SDG 13: Climate action—Impacts on forests and people. In Sustainable Development Goals: Their Impacts on Forests and People; Pierce Colfer, C.J., Winkel, G., Galloway, G., Pacheco, P., Katila, P., de Jong, W., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 419–444. [Google Scholar]
- Simpson, H.; de Loë, R. The agricultural community as a social network in a collaborative, multi-stakeholder problem-solving process. Water 2017, 9, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Moote; Lowe, K. Issues in Forest Restoration: What to Expect from Collaboration in Natural Resource Management: A Research Synthesis for Practitioners; NAU Ecological Restoration Institute: Flagstaff, AZ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Enserink, B.; Hermans, L.; Bots, P.; Koppenjan, J.; Kwakkel, J.; Thissen, W. Policy Analysis of Multi-Actor Systems; Eleven International Pub: den Haag, The Netherlands, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Reed, M.S.; Graves, A.; Dandy, N.; Posthumus, H.; Hubacek, K.; Morris, J.; Prell, C.; Quinn, C.H.; Stringer, L.C. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 1933–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prell, C.; Hubacek, K.; Reed, M. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2009, 22, 501–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reed, M.S.; Curzon, R. Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: A literature review. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 2015, 12, 15–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raum, S. A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 29, 170–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laktić, T.; Žiberna, A.; Kogovšek, T.; Pezdevšek Malovrh, Š. Stakeholders’ social network in the participatory process of formulation of Natura 2000 Management Programme in Slovenia. Forests 2020, 11, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Bulkeley, H. Climate policy and governance: An editorial essay: Climate policy and governance. Wires Clim. Chang. 2010, 1, 311–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andonova, L.B.; Betsill, M.M.; Bulkeley, H. Transnational climate governance. Glob. Environ. Politics 2009, 9, 52–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuyper, J.W.; Linnér, B.-O.; Schroeder, H. Non-state actors in hybrid global climate governance: Justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post-Paris era: Non-state actors in hybrid global climate governance. Wires Clim. Chang. 2018, 9, e497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Paletto, A.; Balest, J.; Demeo, I.; Giacovelli, G.; Grilli, G. Power of forest stakeholders in the participatory decision making process: A case study in northern Italy. Acta Silv. Lignaria Hung. 2016, 12, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Borg, R.; Toikka, A.; Primmer, E. Social capital and governance: A social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in central Finland. For. Policy Econ. 2015, 50, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauck, J.; Schmidt, J.; Werner, A. Using social network analysis to identify key stakeholders in agricultural biodiversity governance and related land-use decisions at regional and local level. E&S 2016, 21, art49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laktić, T.; Pezdevšek Malovrh, Š. Stakeholder participation in Natura 2000 Management Program: Case study of Slovenia. Forests 2018, 9, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Knoke, D.; Kuklinski, J.H. Network analysis: Basic concepts. In Markets, Hierarchies & Networks: The Coordination of Social Life; Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R., Mitchell, J., Eds.; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1991; pp. 173–182. [Google Scholar]
- Provan, K.G.; Huang, K.; Milward, H.B. The evolution of structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed health and human services network. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2009, 19, 873–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juhola, S.; Westerhoff, L. Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: A case study of network governance in two European countries. Environ. Sci. Policy 2011, 14, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunningham, R.; Cvitanovic, C.; Measham, T.; Jacobs, B.; Dowd, A.-M.; Harman, B. Engaging communities in climate adaptation: The potential of social networks. Clim. Policy 2016, 16, 894–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Živojinović, I.; Wolfslehner, B.; Tomićević-Dubljević, J. Social and policy aspects of climate change adaptation in urban forests of Belgrade. SEEFOR 2015, 6, 219–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Gray, B. The pathways of my research: A journey of personal engagement and change. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 1989, 25, 383–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brugha, R. Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy Plan. 2000, 15, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Grimble, R.; Wellard, K. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agric. Syst. 1997, 55, 173–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weible, C.M. Beliefs and perceived influence in a natural resource conflict: An advocacy coalition approach to policy networks. Political Res. Q. 2005, 58, 461–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, W.C. Interest groups: Economic perspectives and contributions. J. Theor. Politics 1990, 2, 85–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grimble, R.; Chan, M.; Aglionby, J.; Quan, J. Trees and Trade-Offs: A Stakeholder Approach to Natural Resource Management; Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Lienert, J.; Schnetzer, F.; Ingold, K. Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 125, 134–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Wasserman, S.; Faust, K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications; Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Freeman, R.E. The Stakeholder Approach Revisited. Z. Wirtsch. Unternehm. 2004, 5, 228–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Harary, F.; Norman, R.; Cartwright, D. Structure Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
- Scott, J.; Carrington, P. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Ibarra, H.; Andrews, S.B. Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Adm. Sci. Q. 1993, 38, 277–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newman, M.E.J. The structure of scientific collaboration Networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goyal, S. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- De Nooy, W.; Mrvar, A.; Batagelj, V. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Revised and Expanded Edition for Updated Software, 3rd ed.; Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Crona, B.; Bodin, Ö. What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management. E&S 2006, 11, art7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Lovrić, M.; Lovrić, N.; Mavsar, R. Mapping forest-based bioeconomy research in Europe. For. Policy Econ. 2020, 110, 101874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowley, T.J. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1997, 22, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svendsen, A.C.; Laberge, M. Convening stakeholder networks. J. Corp. Citizsh. 2005, 2005, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dos Muchangos, L.S.; Tokai, A.; Hanashima, A. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis to evaluate the stakeholders of a MSWM system—A pilot study of Maputo city. Environ. Dev. 2017, 24, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritchie, J.; Lewis, J. (Eds.) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2003; ISBN 0-7619-7109-2. [Google Scholar]
- Ackermann, F.; Eden, C. Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice. Long Range Plan. 2011, 44, 179–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borgatti, S.; Everett, M.; Freeman, L. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis; Analytic Technologies: Harvard, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Albert, R.; Jeong, H.; Barabási, A.-L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 2000, 406, 378–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Olsson, P.; Folke, C. Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: A study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 2001, 4, 85–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ernstson, H.; Sörlin, S.; Elmqvist, T. Social movements and ecosystem services: The role of social network structure in protecting and managing Urban Green Areas in Stockholm. E&S 2008, 13, art39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Leavitt, H.J. Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 1951, 46, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lähtinen, K.; Toppinen, A.; Suojanen, H.; Stern, T.; Ranacher, L.; Burnard, M.; Kitek Kuzman, M. Forest sector sustainability communication in Europe: A systematic literature review on the contents and gaps. Curr. For. Rep. 2017, 3, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandström, C.; Lindkvist, A.; Öhman, K.; Nordström, E.-M. Governing competing demands for forest resources in Sweden. Forests 2011, 2, 218–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, B. Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Hum. Relat. 1985, 38, 911–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodin, Ö.; Crona, B.I. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a diference? Glob. Environ. Chang. 2009, 19, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granovetter, M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 1985, 91, 481–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodin, Ö.; Crona, B.I. Management of natural resources at the community level: Exploring the role of social capital and leadership in a rural fishing community. World Dev. 2008, 36, 2763–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, H.; Chung, M.-H.; Labianca, G. Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Acad. Manag. J. 2004, 47, 860–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodin, Ö.; Norberg, J. Information network topologies for enhanced local adaptive management. Environ. Manag. 2005, 35, 175–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grafton, R.Q. Social capital and fisheries governance. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2005, 48, 753–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, M.; Scholz, J.; Lubell, M.; Mindruta, D.; Edwardsen, M. Building consensual institutions: Networks and the national estuary program. Am. J. Political Sci. 2003, 47, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woolcock, M. Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory Soc. 1998, 27, 151–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woolcock, M. The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. ISUMA Can. J. Policy Res. 2001, 2, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
- Mwangi, E.; Wardell, A. Multi-level governance of forest resources. Int. J. Commons 2012, 6, 79–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pretty, J.; Ward, H. Social capital and the environment. World Dev. 2001, 29, 209–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klijn, E.H.; Steijn, B.; Edelenbos, J. The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks. Public Adm. 2010, 88, 1063–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Koeszegi, S.T. Trust-building strategies in inter-organizational negotiations. J. Manag. Psychol. 2004, 19, 640–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baird, J.; Plummer, R.; Bodin, Ö. Collaborative governance for climate change adaptation in Canada: Experimenting with adaptive co-management. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2016, 16, 747–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaffee, S.L.; Wondolleck, J.M. Making collaboration work: Lessons from a comprehensive assessment of over 200 wideranging cases of collaboration in environmental management. Conserv. Pract. 2000, 1, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trimble, M.; Berkes, F. Participatory research towards co-management: Lessons from artisanal fisheries in Coastal Uruguay. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 128, 768–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davenport, M.A.; Leahy, J.E.; Anderson, D.H.; Jakes, P.J. Building trust in natural resource management within local communities: A case study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Environ. Manag. 2007, 39, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Broto, V.C.; Macucule, D.A.; Boyd, E.; Ensor, J.; Allen, C. Building collaborative partnerships for climate change action in Maputo, Mozambique. Environ. Plan. A 2015, 47, 571–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Gaillard, J.C.; Monteil, C.; Perrillat-Collomb, A.; Chaudhary, S.; Chaudhary, M.; Chaudhary, O.; Giazzi, F.; Cadag, J.R.D. Participatory 3-dimension mapping: A tool for encouraging multi-caste collaboration to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Appl. Geogr. 2013, 45, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grygoruk, M.; Rannow, S. Mind the Gap! Lessons from science-based stakeholder dialogue in climate-adapted management of wetlands. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 186, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hermansen, E.; McNeill, D.; Kasa, S.; Rajão, R. Co-operation or co-optation? NGOs’ roles in Norway’s international climate and forest initiative. Forests 2017, 8, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Cent, J.; Mertens, C.; Niedziałkowski, K. Roles and impacts of non-governmental organizations in Natura 2000 implementation in Hungary and Poland. Environ. Conserv. 2013, 40, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Manolache, S.; Nita, A.; Ciocanea, C.M.; Popescu, V.D.; Rozylowicz, L. Power, influence and structure in Natura 2000 governance networks. A comparative analysis of two protected areas in Romania. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 212, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sector | Organization | Statistical Region | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Šumadija & Western Serbia | Southern & Eastern Serbia | |||
Public sector | Public enterprise for state forest management “Srbijašume” | 14 | 20 | 34 |
Public enterprise for management of protective forests of Vrnjačka banja “Šume-Goč” | 2 | - | 2 | |
Public enterprises national parks | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
Local self-government | 14 | 20 | 34 | |
Civil sector | Nongovernmental organizations | 10 | 17 | 27 |
45 | 58 | 103 |
Variable | Value | Code |
---|---|---|
Frequency of contacts | Daily and weekly | 1 |
Monthly, quarterly, yearly | 0 | |
Interest in climate change governance | Same interest value | 1 |
Different interest value | 0 | |
Perceived influence on climate change governance | Same perceived influence value | 1 |
Different perceived influence value | 0 | |
National governance level | Same level affiliation | 1 |
Different level affiliation | 0 | |
Regional governance level | Same level affiliation | 1 |
Different level affiliation | 0 | |
Local governance level | Same level affiliation | 1 |
Different level affiliation | 0 | |
Statistical region | Same region affiliation | 1 |
Different region affiliation | 0 | |
Public sector | Same sector affiliation | 1 |
Different sector affiliation | 0 | |
Civil and private sector | Same sector affiliation | 1 |
Different sector affiliation | 0 | |
Central position in the network | Yes | 1 |
No | 0 |
Public Sector | ||
---|---|---|
Group | Stakeholders in the “Key Players” Quadrant | |
Public administration and local self-government: | Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management—Directorate of Forests (MAFWM-DF) | |
Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) | ||
Ministry of Interior—Sector for emergency management (MI) | ||
City departments and municipal divisions for emergency management (DDEM) | ||
Agencies and institutes | Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia (INCS) | |
City Institutes for Public Health (CIPH) | ||
Education and research organizations | The University of Belgrade—Forestry Faculty (UB-FF) | |
The University of Belgrade—Faculty of Biology (UB-FB) | ||
PE | PE NPs | PE “NP Tara”, Bajina Bašta; PE “NP Đerdap”, Donji Milanovac; PE “NP Kopaonik”, Kopaonik; |
Other PEs | PE “Elektroprivreda Srbije” branch HE “Đerdap”, Kladovo; branch Drinsko-Limske HE, Bajina Bašta (PEES) |
Public Sector | ||
---|---|---|
Group | Stakeholders in the “Subjects” Quadrant | |
Public administration and local self-government | Ministry of Interior—sector for emergency management (MI) | |
City administration (CG) Departments, divisions, and services for environmental protection Departments, divisions, and services for environmental control and inspection | ||
Municipal administration (MG) Departments and divisions for environmental protection Departments, divisions, and services for environmental control and inspection Departments and division for economic development | ||
Village communities (VC) | ||
Education and research organizations | Primary and Secondary Schools (PSS) | |
Institute of Forestry, Belgrade (IF) | ||
PE | PE for state forest management | PE “Srbijašume”—forest estates (FE) and forest management units (FMU) |
Other PE’s | PUE for Greenery (PUEGREE) | |
PWE “Srbijavode” (PWES) | ||
Civil Sector | ||
Environmental NGOs | Pokret gorana Srbije (NGO GOR) | |
Local environmental NGOs (NGO) | ||
Timočki klub, Knjaževac (NGOKNJ) | ||
Citizens associations | Business and professional associations | Hunting associations (HA) |
Private Sector | ||
Private forest owners (PFO) | Associations of private forest owners (APFO) | |
Physical persons |
Areas for the Collaboration | Degree Range | Eigenvector Centrality Range | Density | Average Distance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Remediation of forest damages from ice breaks, floods, and fires (Area 1) | 1–40 | 0.013–0.638 | 0.010 | 2.400 |
Workshops, seminars and expert knowledge exchange (Area 2) | 1–70 | 0.001–0.472 | 0.035 | 2.520 |
Tree planting, waste disposal and green space maintenance (Area 3) | 1–52 | 0.002–0.677 | 0.014 | 2.708 |
Project-related activities (Area 4) | 1–32 | 0.001–0.647 | 0.012 | 3.206 |
Climate related data and information exchange (Area 5) | 1–47 | 0.003–0.404 | 0.032 | 2.524 |
Information exchange with emergency department and divisions (Area 6) | 1–13 | 0.057–0.700 | 0.002 | 2.156 |
Information exchange concerning environmental monitoring and precaution (Area 7) | 1–33 | 0.123–0.707 | 0.004 | 1.941 |
Dependent Variables 1 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaboration Network | Remediation of Forest Damages | Workshops, Seminars and Expert Knowledge Exchange | Tree Planting, Waste Disposal and Green Space Maintenance | Project-Related Activities | Climate Related Data and Information Exchange | Information Exchange with Emergency Department and Divisions 5 | Information Exchange Concerning Environment. Monitoring and Precaution 6 | |||||||||
R2 per Area for the Collaboration | 0.59845 | 0.11611 | 0.06570 | 0.05562 | 0.01155 | 0.25759 | 0.00472 | 0.05960 | ||||||||
Coefficient 3 | p value 4 | Coefficient | p value | Coefficient | p value | Coefficient | p value | Coefficient | p value | Coefficient | p value | Coefficient | p value | Coefficient | p value | |
Independent Variables 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Intercept | 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 |
Collaboration frequency | 0.67584 | 0.00010 | 0.31404 | 0.00010 | 0.12944 | 0.00010 | −0.04337 | 0.00130 | 0.06579 | 0.00070 | 0.47843 | 0.00010 | 0.01654 | 0.11409 | 0.23097 | 0.00010 |
Interest value | −0.00512 | 0.34807 | 0.04848 | 0.00520 | −0.05738 | 0.01090 | 0.03126 | 0.08599 | 0.01147 | 0.30587 | −0.08839 | 0.00010 | 0.03691 | 0.00770 | −0.04342 | 0.07069 |
Perceived influence value | 0.01082 | 0.16428 | 0.00449 | 0.43246 | 0.01220 | 0.27437 | 0.03729 | 0.01120 | 0.02612 | 0.05009 | 0.01168 | 0.23888 | 0.00182 | 0.46575 | −0.03497 | 0.10909 |
Sector affiliation | 0.02619 | 0.01870 | 0.02564 | 0.09789 | −0.00231 | 0.44916 | 0.02005 | 0.19118 | −0.03014 | 0.06189 | 0.05911 | 0.00010 | 0.03606 | 0.00860 | 0.03209 | 0.10029 |
Statistical region affiliation | 0.13481 | 0.00010 | −0.02005 | 0.13289 | 0.10218 | 0.00590 | 0.23602 | 0.00010 | 0.02967 | 0.07339 | −0.05709 | 0.00060 | 0.02115 | 0.07259 | −0.04867 | 0.00060 |
National level affiliation | −0.03471 | 0.00020 | −0.00957 | 0.28857 | −0.01709 | 0.16578 | −0.05233 | 0.00010 | 0.03226 | 0.03610 | −0.01079 | 0.23738 | −0.01563 | 0.05559 | −0.00553 | 0.46245 |
Regional level affiliation | −0.00019 | 0.51665 | −0.0348 | 0.00470 | 0.07204 | 0.00090 | −0.02610 | 0.02730 | −0.02253 | 0.02660 | −0.03950 | 0.00160 | −0.01590 | 0.04260 | −0.01473 | 0.17848 |
Local level affiliation | −0.05907 | 0.00170 | −0.04610 | 0.08939 | −0.02541 | 0.22358 | −0.04411 | 0.13069 | −0.04764 | 0.04350 | −0.05953 | 0.01790 | −0.04071 | 0.02900 | −0.02217 | 0.30367 |
Centrality of position | 0.15087 | 0.00010 | 0.02803 | 0.16028 | 0.11990 | 0.00010 | 0.02565 | 0.21358 | 0.00965 | 0.32487 | 0.00173 | 0.45805 | −0.01706 | 0.18818 | −0.01555 | 0.40706 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Stanišić, M.; Lovrić, M.; Nedeljković, J.; Nonić, D.; Pezdevšek Malovrh, Š. Climate Change Governance in Forestry and Nature Conservation in Selected Forest Regions in Serbia: Stakeholders Classification and Collaboration. Forests 2021, 12, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060709
Stanišić M, Lovrić M, Nedeljković J, Nonić D, Pezdevšek Malovrh Š. Climate Change Governance in Forestry and Nature Conservation in Selected Forest Regions in Serbia: Stakeholders Classification and Collaboration. Forests. 2021; 12(6):709. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060709
Chicago/Turabian StyleStanišić, Mirjana, Marko Lovrić, Jelena Nedeljković, Dragan Nonić, and Špela Pezdevšek Malovrh. 2021. "Climate Change Governance in Forestry and Nature Conservation in Selected Forest Regions in Serbia: Stakeholders Classification and Collaboration" Forests 12, no. 6: 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060709