Next Article in Journal
Correction: Bronisz K. and Zasada M., Comparison of Fixed- and Mixed-Effects Approaches to Taper Modeling for Scots Pine in West Poland. Forests 2019, 10, 975
Previous Article in Journal
Describing Medicinal Non-Timber Forest Product Trade in Eastern Deciduous Forests of the United States
Open AccessArticle

An Assessment of Stumpage Price and the Price Index of Chinese Fir Timber Forests in Southern China Using a Hedonic Price Model

by Hong Chen 1,2,3, Zhongsheng He 1,3, Wei Hong 1 and Jinfu Liu 1,2,3,*
1
College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Shangxiadianlu 15, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
College of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Shangxiadianlu 15, Fuzhou 350002, China
3
Key Lab of Ecology and Resources Statistics of Fujian Colleges, Shangxiadianlu15, Fuzhou 350002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2020, 11(4), 436; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040436
Received: 28 February 2020 / Revised: 5 April 2020 / Accepted: 9 April 2020 / Published: 12 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Economics, Policy, and Social Science)
Research Highlights: Stumpage price is the most important factor affecting the value of forests. Therefore, an understanding of the factors affecting stumpage prices and trends is critical for effective forest management. Background and Objectives: Chinese fir is the most important fast-growing timber species in China, it is also the tree species with the largest trading volume in the stumpage markets of Southern China. The aim of this study was to analyze the determinants and trends of stumpage prices for Chinese fir timber forests. Materials and Methods: Data on 928 sales of Chinese fir timber forests transacted between 2007 and 2016 were gathered from the stumpage markets in Southern China. We analyzed the relationship between stumpage prices and sales characteristics using the hedonic price method (HPM) and measured the stumpage price index with a dummy time hedonic index. Results: (1) The double logarithmic form of the HPM yielded a more accurate estimate than the semi logarithmic form. The R2ad values in the nine annual prediction models were all above 80%. Stock volume made the greatest contribution to stumpage price, followed by stand age. Stand area had no significant impact on the stumpage price. (2) Stumpage prices of Chinese fir timber forests fluctuated greatly, especially in 2010 and 2015 when the sequential price indexes were 180.01% and 74.95%, respectively. Taking 2007 as the baseline, we calculated the base price index in 2016 to be 197%, with an average annual growth rate of 7.82%. (3) The stumpage market was associated with a higher degree of risk than the timber market. Conclusions: Our findings provide valuable inputs that can guide and facilitate the Chinese government’s efforts to optimize resource allocation and standardize the stumpage market. View Full-Text
Keywords: stumpage price; Chinese fir timber forests; hedonic price method; dummy time hedonic index; Southern China stumpage price; Chinese fir timber forests; hedonic price method; dummy time hedonic index; Southern China
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, H.; He, Z.; Hong, W.; Liu, J. An Assessment of Stumpage Price and the Price Index of Chinese Fir Timber Forests in Southern China Using a Hedonic Price Model. Forests 2020, 11, 436.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop