Next Article in Journal
Factors Influencing the Geographical Distribution of Dendroctonus armandi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytidae) in China
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Warming and Nitrogen Addition on the Soil Bacterial Community in a Subtropical Chinese Fir Plantation
Previous Article in Journal
Salicylic Acid Alleviated Salt Damage of Populus euphratica: A Physiological and Transcriptomic Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Forest Thinning on Soil Microbial Community Structure and Function
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Tree Species in a Planted Forest of Eastern China

1
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Road, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
3
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA 95615, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2019, 10(5), 424; https://doi.org/10.3390/f10050424
Submission received: 17 April 2019 / Revised: 9 May 2019 / Accepted: 15 May 2019 / Published: 16 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Microbial Communities and Processes)

Abstract

:
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) play an important role in the establishment and maintenance of plant communities in forest ecosystems. Most previous studies about AMF have been conducted in natural forests, and little attention has been paid to trees in planted forests. This study investigated AMF associated with tree species and the relationships between edaphic factors and AMF communities in a planted forest of eastern China. We found high total AMF colonization rates in the roots of Carya illinoensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch, Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Makinoz, Taxodium ‘zhongshansha’, Eucommia ulmoides Oliv., and Elaeagnus pungens Thunb., ranging from 62.07% to 100%, indicating that AMF can establish effective symbiotic relationships with these tree species. The AMF colonization rate was significantly and negatively correlated with soil phosphorus, while AMF colonization intensity was significantly and negatively correlated with soil moisture content, total carbon, and organic matter content. Spore density was in the range of 4.38 to 76.38 spores per g soil. In total, 35 AMF species from 10 genera were identified. Glomus and Acaulospora were the dominant genera. Acaulospora foveata and Septoglomus constrictum were the dominant species. AMF communities differed among the tree species and were closely related to edaphic factors, and AMF diversity was significantly related to soil carbon and pH. Our results revealed the colonization, community, and diversity of AMF associated with tree species, as well as their relationships with edaphic factors, in planted forests. Our findings can be used to provide insight on the utilization and management of AMF to maintain sustainable management of planted forests.

1. Introduction

Planted forests play an increasingly important role in meeting the demand for wood and environmental conservation, and 20% of forests in China are categorized as planted forest land, covering an area of about one-third of the world’s planted forest land. Decreasing soil quality is the principal threat to sustainable forest management, particularly in planted forests. Harnessing soil microorganisms provides an eco-friendly and cost-effective method to solve that problem. Soil microorganisms play important roles in soil formation, nutrient cycling, nutrient uptake, and reclamation of ecosystems [1,2,3]. In particular, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic associations with the roots of more than 80% of plant species [4], and they play a vital role in the successful establishment and maintenance of plant communities [5]. AMF hyphae can take up phosphorous (P), which cannot be absorbed by root hairs [6], and the AMF soil mycelial network provides many benefits to host plants [7], including plant growth promotion [8,9] and improvement of plant resistance to stress and disease [10,11]. In addition, AMF can be beneficial to soil aggregation as a result of the actions of hyphae and glomalin secretion [1,12]. Hence, the occurrence and colonization of AMF would be beneficial to the survival of tree seedlings and the sustainable management of forests. Investigations on the mycorrhizal colonization statuses of tree species were mainly made in natural forest ecosystems, and have rarely been made in planted forests.
Moreover, the AMF species associated with plant species have different functions to hosts and important influences on the distribution, diversity, and regeneration of plant communities [13]. The biological and functional diversity of AMF is vitally important to forest ecosystems, and can be decisive for plant community structures and productivity [14,15]. Previous studies on AMF diversity in forests have been conducted mainly in Brazil [16,17], Mexico [18], USA [19], India [20,21], Bangladesh [22], Ethiopia [23], and China [24]. In China, AMF diversity was examined in grassland ecosystems [25,26], an agroecosystem [27], a wetland ecosystem [28], and a natural forest ecosystem [29], mostly concentrating on medicinal plants [30,31] and herbaceous plants [32]. However, knowledge about the diversity of AMF associated with tree species in planted forests is scanty. It is well known that AMF are widespread in various ecosystems, and their colonization and community are also influenced by soil physicochemical properties [33]. It is important to consider the influence of abiotic factors on root colonization and fungal community composition when investigating the diversity of AMF.
In the present study, Carya illinoensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch, Populus lasiocarpa Oliv., Metasequoia glyptostroboides Hu et Cheng, Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Makinoz, Taxodium ‘zhongshansha’, Eucommia ulmoides Oliv., Ginkgo biloba Linn., and Elaeagnus pungens Thunb. in a planted forest of eastern China were selected as studied tree species because of their important ecological and economic values. Although some of the tree species, such as C. illinoensis, have been described as forming mycorrhizas with ectomycorrhizal fungi Tuber [34], they might also form mycorrhizas with AMF. Here, we focused on the AMF associated with trees. The AMF colonization statuses and spore community compositions in the rhizospheres of the eight tree species were estimated. The relationship between edaphic factors and AMF was been studied. The results of this study would provide insight on the utilization and management of AMF to maintain sustainable management of planted forests.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Sites and Sampling

The Jiangsu coastal area is located in eastern China. The beach area is 6520 million square meters, accounting for more than one quarter of the total beach area in China, which is expanding by 26–33 million square meters per year. Although this beach area is a valuable reserve land resource, poor soil fertility, high salt content, a shallow water table, frequent inclement weather, and a vulnerable ecosystem make it very difficult to construct a protective forest in this area. The Chinese government has been trying to develop forestry in the Jiangsu coastal area. The Dafeng forest farm (33°03′ N, 120°43′ E) of Jiangsu Province was established to develop plantations in the 1950s, and different tree species were transplanted to the farm at different times. Eight ecological and economic tree species, C. illinoensis, P. lasiocarpa, M. glyptostroboides, Z. serrata, T. ‘zhongshansha’, E. ulmoides, G. biloba, and E. pungens, were imported from local tree nurseries in 1990–1998. The tree species were randomly planted in different plots (one tree species per plot), and each tree species was planted in more than three plots. The plots were more than 6000 m2, and the distance between plots was more than 1000 m. These plots were of light saline land, and the growths of trees were not seriously affected by salt in the soil.
Samples were collected from the planted forest in the Dafeng forest farm in October 2017. The region is located in the subtropical and warm–wet transition zone, with a mean annual temperature of 14 °C and mean annual rainfall of approximately 1058.4 mm [35]. The eight ecological and economic tree species mentioned above were examined in this study, with three sampling plots employed for each tree species. Each plot included triplicate samples, and the distances between the replicates were greater than 10 m. The fine roots and rhizosphere soils (soils adhering to roots) (about 1500 g each) were collected at depths of 5–30 cm from triplicate samples and mixed together as one sample. A total of 24 samples were collected. The soil samples were divided into two parts, with one part used for soil physicochemical analysis and the other used for spore isolation studies. The soil samples were air-dried for about 2 weeks, and the physical and chemical properties of rhizosphere soils adhered to roots of tree species were measured. The roots were washed carefully with tap water, and both the soil and root samples were stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C until used.

2.2. Soil Physicochemical Analysis

The air-dried soil samples were sieved through a 2 mm grid. Soil pH was measured in a soil:water suspension (1:5 (w/v)) with a digital pH meter (PHS-3D, Shanghai Leici Instrument Limited Company, Shanghai, China). To determine the soil moisture content (SM), the soil samples were dried at 105 °C for 48 h, and SM was calculated as water (%) by mass = [(wet mass − dry mass)/dry mass]. Soil electric conductivity (EC) was measured in a soil:water suspension (1:5 (w/v)) using a conductivity meter (DDS-11C, Shanghai Hong Yi Instrument Company). Nitrate nitrogen content (NN) was determined using the phenol disulfonic acid method [36]. Available phosphorus (AP) and total phosphorus (TP) were extracted by sodium bicarbonate, and their concentrations were estimated using molybdenum blue colorimetry [37]. Available potassium (AK) and total potassium (TK) were extracted by ammonium acetate, and their contents were determined using a flame photometer (Sherwood, Model 425 Flame Photometer, Sherwood, Chicago, IL, USA). Organic matter content (OM) was measured by wet oxidation with potassium dichromate [38]. Soil total nitrogen (TN), total carbon (C), and total sulfur (S) contents were determined using an elemental analyzer (Vario MACRO cube, Elementar Trading Shanghai, Shanghai, China).

2.3. Assessment of AMF Colonization

The clearly washed fine roots were soaked in 10% (w/v) KOH, and then stained with 0.05% trypan blue solution in lactic acid–glycerol as described by Phillips and Hayman [39]. The percentage of root colonization including total AMF colonization (RLC, %), vesicle colonization (RLV, %), arbuscules colonization (RLA, %), hyphae colonization (RLH, %), and the colonization intensity were estimated based on a previously described method [40].

2.4. AMF Spore Quantification and Identification

The AMF spores were extracted from a sample of 100 g air-dried soil by wet sieving and sucrose density centrifugation [41]. For determining the spore density (SD), the isolated intact healthy spores were collected on a filter paper and separated by morphotype, including spore size, color, ornamentations, wall layers, and hyphal attachments, and then counted under a dissecting microscope at 45 × magnification. The spores were mounted in polyvinyl lactoglycerol (PVLG) and PVLG + Melzer’s reagent (1:1, v/v) [42]. The spores were identified according to the identification manuals provided by [43], recent advances in Glomeromycota taxonomy [44,45,46], and the reference culture descriptions (http://invam.wvu.edu/the-fungi/classification and http: //www.zor.zut.edu.p1/Glomeromycota).

2.5. Diversity Studies and Statistical Analyses

The frequency of occurrence (FO), relative abundance (RA), importance value (IV), spore density (SD), species richness (SR), Shannon–Wiener index (H), and evenness (E) were used to estimate the structure of the AMF community. These parameters can be calculated by the following formulas:
FO = (number of samples in which the species or genus was observed/total samples) × 100%
where species were put into the following categories, based on percent occurrence: Dominant (50%), most common (31%–50%), common (10%–30%), and rare (<10%), according to Zhang et al. [47].
  • RA = (spore number of species or genus/total spore number) × 100%
  • IV = (FO + RA)/2
  • SD = spore number/100 g air-dried soil
  • SR = species number/soil sample
  • H = i = 1 k ( P i lnP i ) ; P i = n i /N, where n i is the spore number of a species and N is the total number of identified spore samples [48].
  • E = H/ H max ;   H max = ln S, where S is the total number of identified species.
Correlation analysis was conducted using SPSS 17.0 to test for a possible correlation between the colonization rate, diversity of AMF, and soil properties. Redundancy analysis (RDA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) were performed with Canoco for Windows (version 5.0, Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA) to reveal the influence of edaphic properties on the composition of AMF communities. Rare species were removed and AMF spore number data were transformed to log (x + 1) for the analysis.

3. Results

3.1. AMF Colonization and SD

The SD and AMF colonization statuses for the eight ecological and economic tree species studied are shown in Table 1. The results revealed that all the tree species examined could be colonized by AMF. Among the eight tree species studied, the RLA, RLH, and SD of E. ulmoides were the highest, corresponding to 83.91%, 87.36%, and 12,281 per 100 g air-dried soil, respectively. C. illinoensis and T. ‘zhongshansha’ presented the highest RLV (59.00%) and RLC (90.30%). The RLC values of Z. serrata and E. pungens were more than 70.00%, and their spores were 3871 and 1880 per 100 g air-dried soil, respectively. Although the RLC of Z. serrata was not low, the colonization intensity was inferior. Furthermore, the variations in RLC of M. glyptostroboides and P. lasiocarpa were high, ranging from 12.90% to 86.65%, whereas that of P. lasiocarpa ranged from 25.81% to 90.00%. The RLC, RLV, RLA, RLH, and SD of G. biloba were lower than those of the other tree species, with values corresponding to 12.26%, 8.93%, 6.70%, 11.15%, and 9.18% per 100 g air-dried soil, respectively. These results indicated that C. illinoensis, P. lasiocarpa, M. glyptostroboides, T. ‘zhongshansha’, E. ulmoides, and E. pungens could form a good symbiotic relationship with AMF, whereas Z. serrata and G. biloba did not rely on AMF.

3.2. Identification of Spores and AMF Community Composition and Diversity

A total of 35 AMF species were identified in the rhizosphere soils of the eight tree species examined (Figure 1; Table 2). These AMF belonged to 10 genera and six families (Glomeraceae, Claroideoglomeraceae, Gigasporaceae, Acaulosporaceae, Ambisporaceae, and Archaeosporaceae). A total of 79.51% of AMF spores were from the Glomeraceae family, and 49.28% were from the genus Rhizophagus. Acaulospora foveata and Septoglomus constrictum were the dominant species, with FO values of more than 50%. Acaulospora foveata was found in the rhizosphere soils of all tree species studied, while Rhizophagus clarus (28.99%) was the most abundant AMF species.
Among the eight tree species investigated, the SR of AMF was the highest for E. pungens and lowest for Z. serrata (Table 3). Interestingly, the most abundant AMF species and genera differed with the tree species. R. clarus was the most abundant AMF species for Z. serrata and E. ulmoides, Glomus reticulatum was the most abundant AMF species for T. ‘zhongshansha’, and Rhizophagus intraradices was the most abundant AMF species for P. lasiocarpa. Furthermore, Rhizophagus was the most abundant AMF genus for P. lasiocarpa, Z. serrata, and E. ulmoides; Glomus was the most abundant AMF genus for T. ‘zhongshansha’ and G. biloba; and Acaulospora was the most abundant genus for M. glyptostroboides and E. pungens. The SR for E. ulmoides was significantly lower than those for E. pungens and C. illinoensis. The H values for E. ulmoides and Z. serrata were significantly lower than those for C. illinoensis, M. glyptostroboides, and G. biloba, and the E value for M. glyptostroboides was significantly higher than that for Z. serrata (Table 3).

3.3. Chemical and Physical Soil Parameters

The soil properties of the rhizospheres of the eight ecological and economic tree species examined are presented in Table 4. The SM of the rhizosphere of Z. serrata was significantly higher than those of the rhizospheres of E. ulmoides and G. biloba. The soil TN in the rhizosphere of E. pungens was significantly higher than that in the rhizosphere of E. ulmoides. Furthermore, the soil TP in the rhizosphere of G. biloba was the highest, and was significantly higher than those in the rhizospheres of the other tree species, while the soil AP ranged from 2.31 to 17.11 mg/kg, with the highest soil AP being found in the rhizosphere of M. glyptostroboides. The soil OM, C, and S in the rhizospheres of Z. serrata and M. glyptostroboides were higher than those in the rhizospheres of the other tree species. However, no differences in soil pH, EC, NN, AK, and TK were found among all the soil samples from the rhizospheres of the examined tree species.

3.4. Relationship between Soil Factors and AMF

AMF colonization and community diversity were significantly related to soil properties (Table 5). While RLC, RLA, and RLH were negatively and significantly correlated with TP (p < 0.01), a significant positive correlation was observed between RLV and TK (r = 0.483, p < 0.05). Colonization intensity was noted to be negatively and significantly correlated with SM (r = −0.417, p < 0.05), OM (r = −0.467, p < 0.05), C (r = 0.496, p < 0.05), and S (r = 0.453, p < 0.05). Moreover, while there was no significant correlation between SD and soil properties, a significant positive correlation was found between SR and pH (r = 0.478, p < 0.05). Besides, C negatively and significantly affected SR (r = −0.415, p < 0.05) and H (r = −0.408, p < 0.05).
Based on the RDA results related to AMF community composition (Figure 2), it was noted that pH significantly related to Claroideoglomus (p < 0.01), SM significantly related to Ambispora and Septoglomus (p < 0.05), and TK significantly related to Glomus (p < 0.05). However, none of the soil properties had significant relationships with Acaulospora, Rhizophagus, Funneliformis, and Glomeraceae.
CCA revealed that edaphic factors could explain only 17.17% of the variations in AMF species composition and diversity (Figure 2). According to the CCA results, soil pH and TK were positively correlated with the occurrence of Acaulospora excavate, Claroideoglomus etunicatum, and G. reticulatum; soil EC and NN were positively correlated with the occurrence of Acaulospora foveata, Claroideoglomus claroideum, Funneliformis geosporum, Funneliformis mosseae, Glomus pustulatum, and Rhizophagus intraradices; and SM, AP, and AK were positively correlated with the occurrence of Acaulospora rehmii, Ambispora leptoticha, Glomus multiforum, Rhizophagus aggregates, Rhizophagus clarus, and Septoglomus constrictum.

4. Discussion

The results of the present study showed that the eight tree species examined in the planted forest were colonized by AMF. However, the AMF colonization status varied significantly depending on sampling point and the planted tree species, consistent with the results of a previous study on AMF of tree species in different forests [22]. Similar variations in AMF colonization have also been found in other types of forests, such as tropical rainforests [24,49] and peat swamp forests [50]. These variances in the colonization of AMF may be caused by mycorrhizal dependencies of different host plants [51], by colonization abilities of various AMF species, and by climatic and edaphic factors [52]. In the present study, when compared with other tree species, the total AMF colonization rates for C. illinoensis, Z. serrata, T. ‘zhongshansha’, E. ulmoides, and E. pungens were high, ranging from 62.07% to 100%. A previous study demonstrated that C. illinoensis formed mycorrhizas with ectomycorrhizal fungi Tuber [34]. Our study indicated that AMF can establish better symbiotic relationships with these five tree species above, including C. illinoensis, compared with other tree species.
It is well known that soil properties have an important influence on the colonization of AMF. High soil fertility can affect the sporulation and colonization ability of AMF. Among all the nutrient elements, P is most closely associated with mycorrhizal formation, playing an important role in regulating the colonization rate of AMF [51]. A fertilization experiment conducted by Shi et al. showed that the colonization rate of AMF was reduced after the addition of a phosphatic fertilizer to the soil [53]. In the present study, the differences of rhizosphere soil physical and chemical properties might be due to the effects of tree species, but in turn could affect AMF colonization and community composition. Correlation analysis showed that RLC, RLA, and RLH were negatively and significantly correlated with TP (p < 0.01). It has been speculated that soil containing a high P content might have a negative impact on the transduction of phosphatase secreted by AMF, restraining the growth of AMF [54]. A significant and positive correlation was observed between RLC and TK; however, its underlying reason needs further research. The OM, which serves as a nutrient sink for plants, could also regulate the intensity of AMF colonization [55], and soil humidity levels have been found to have an important effect on AMF colonization and mycorrhizal efficiency [56]. In the present study, the colonization intensity of AMF was significantly and negatively correlated with SM, C, and OM.
Evaluation of the percent population of AMF spores in the rhizosphere soils of the eight tree species revealed values of SD in the range of 4.38–76.38 per g soil, which are much higher than those reported in the Hazarikhil forest in Bangladesh (0.35–4.32 spores per g soil) [22] and Amazonian terra firme forest in Brazil (1.5–9.4 spores per g soil) [16], comparable with those found in the tropical rainforest of Xishuangbana in China (0.6–19.1 spores per g soil) [57] and the subtropical forest of Huangshan in China (0.45–32.50 spores per g soil) [29], and much lower than those noted in a primary forest in the French Guiana (50–154 spores per g soil) [58]. Besides, no significant relationship was found between SD and edaphic factors, whereas a significant and positive association was detected between SD and AMF colonization rates. These results are in accordance with the research reported by Louis and Lim [59], but contrast to the results of Chaiyasen et al. [60]. These varying findings could be due to plant root traits, spore germination, AMF colonization capacities, and environmental factors.
Glomerospores have key characteristics for identification at the species level, and many studies on AMF have been successfully conducted based on morphological identification [61,62]. In the present study, a total of 35 AMF species were detected via spore morphology in the planted forest, compared with 27 AMF species found in a tropical rainforest [57], 58 AMF species observed in the Brazilian Atlantic forest [63], and 25 AMF species noted in a subtropical forest [29]. Our results demonstrated a high AMF diversity associated with the ecological and economic trees in planted forests. Besides, in the present study, Glomeraceae was the most abundant family, Glomus and Acaulospora were the dominant genera, and Acaulospora foveata and Septoglomus constrictum were the dominant species observed in the rhizosphere of the examined planted forest. Previous studies have also reported Glomus and Acaulospora to be the dominant genera in other forests [33,57], and they might form a functional complementarity with the host. The dominance of Glomus and Acaulospora in planted forests may be related to their smaller spore size, which allows them to easily produce more spores in a short time period. Furthermore, the high isolation frequencies of Acaulospora foveata and Septoglomus constrictum noted in the present study demonstrated the ability of these fungi to adapt well to the local environment. Nevertheless, although Acaulospora foveata and Septoglomus constrictum were widely distributed in soil, their relative abundances were not high, which may be due to their moderate sporulation ability, but strong mycelial network, which can extend over a large area, leading to a wide distribution in soil [64].
The AMF SR and communities in the rhizosphere soils of different tree species varied, which is in accordance with those reported in previous studies [65,66]. These differences in the AMF SR and communities may be owing to the preferences of host plants to AMF [67]. In addition, correlation analysis revealed that AMF SR and H were significantly related to soil C, which could possibly be owing to the abilities of host plants to deliver different levels of C to the soil and indirectly affect the sporulation, growth, and survival of different AMF [14,68]. It must be noted that the differential microenvironments that host plants offer can influence AMF sporulation, community abundance, and diversity. Accordingly, in the present study, Rhizophagus clarus spores were abundant in the rhizosphere soil of Z. serrata, whereas Glomus reticulatum spores were high in the rhizosphere soil of T. ‘zhongshansha’. Thus, these findings could be potentially valuable for selecting high-efficiency AMF for the afforestation of different tree species.
Edaphic factors had a strong impact on the composition of AMF communities [27]. Soil pH is considered to be a key environmental factor that shapes the AMF community structure [69] by influencing the availability of some ions and nutrients from the soil to plants [70]. A previous study showed that soil P was the most significant factor affecting the AMF communities [52], because high P levels in soil could reduce the content and change the composition of root exudates that carry materials and energy necessary for AMF [71]. In addition, soil texture [72], OM [73], and EC [27] have also been reported to affect AMF communities. In the present study, RDA and CCA suggested that soil C and pH were the significant drivers of AMF composition and diversity, followed by soil SM, TP, and TK. Furthermore, in accordance with a previous study suggesting that glomoid species thrive in high pH (7.8) [74], the high abundance and richness of Funneliformis, Glomus, Rhizophagus, and Septoglomus observed in the present study, all of which belong to Glomeraceae, might be attributed to the high soil pH (7.62–8.56). Besides, high soil pH might also be responsible for the relatively low abundance of Acaulospora, which is more widely distributed in acidic soils. Unlike soil pH, the relationship between soil C and AMF communities has rarely been examined. Moreover, the relative abundance of Ambispora and Septoglomus was significantly and positively related to SM, indicating that they may be not adapted to dry conditions. In addition, climatic conditions have been indicated to have an important effect on AMF communities [52], which requires further research.

5. Conclusions

In the studied planted forest, the roots of most trees were colonized by AMF. Among them, the roots of C. illinoensis, Z. serrata, T. ‘zhongshansha’, E. ulmoides, and E. pungens were readily colonized by AMF, which indicates that the application of AMF in afforestation of these tree species has great potential. The AMF colonization rate was significantly and negatively correlated with soil P, which suggests that the application of AMF in afforestation is more suitable in low P soil. In the rhizosphere soils of all the examined tree species, abundant spore numbers and high diversities of AMF species were found. Glomus and Acaulospora were the dominant genera, meaning that they are the most promising genera for application in afforestation. The AMF community composition and diversity were highly related to the host trees and edaphic factors, which indicates that local edaphic factors should be considered when applying AMF in afforestation. In total, the results of this study could be beneficial for the sustainable management of planted forests.

Author Contributions

J.Z., G.G.W., and J.W. conceived the experiments. J.W., Z.Y., Z.F., L.Z., and S.M. conducted the experiments. J.W. and Y.Y. interpreted the data. J.W. wrote the manuscript. B.Z. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Agricultural Science and Technology Independent Innovation Fund of Jiangsu province of China (Grant No. CX (17) 004), the National Special Fund for Forestry Scientific Research in the Public Interest (Grant No. 201504406), the Major Fund for Natural Science of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Grant No. 15KJA220004), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), and the Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University (2169125).

Acknowledgments

B.Z. was supported by the Greater Everglades Priority Ecosystem Science program and UC Davis Chancellors’ postdoc fellowship. The authors thank Yang of Nanjing Forestry University for his suggestions during the writing of this manuscript and the staff at the Dafeng forest farm for their assistance in the field work. We also thank Donald L. De Angelis of the University of Miami and International Science Editing (http://www.internationalscienceediting.com) for editing this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Purin, S.; Rillig, M.C. The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal protein glomalin: Limitations, progress, and a new hypothesis for its function. Pedobiologia 2007, 51, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van der Heijden, M.G.; Bardgett, R.D.; van Straalen, N.M. The unseen majority: Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 296–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, D.; Liu, Y.; Fang, S.; Tian, Y. Tress species composition influenced microbial diversity and nitrogen availability in rhizosphere soil. Plant Soil Environ. 2015, 10, 438–443. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fernández, N.; Fontenla, S.; Messuti, M.I. Co-occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizas and dark septate endophytes in pteridophytes from a Valdivian Temperate Rainforest in Patagonia, Argentina. In Mycorrhiza: Occurrence in Natural and Restored Environments; Pagano, M., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 99–126. [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 13–41. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jakobsen, I. Transport of Phosphorus and Carbon in VA mycorrhizas. In Mycorrhiza; Varma, A., Hock, B., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1995; pp. 297–324. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cardoso, E.J.B.N.; Vasconcellos, R.L.F.; Bini, D.; Miyauchi, M.Y.H.; Santos, C.A.; Alves, P.R.L.; Paula, A.M.; Nakatani, A.S.; Pereira, J.M.; Nogueira, M.A. Soil health: Looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? Sci. Agric. 2013, 70, 219–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wicaksono, W.A.; Sansom, C.E.; Jones, E.E.; Perry, N.B.; Monk, J.; Ridgway, H.J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Leptospermum scoparium (mānuka): Effects on plant growth and essential oil content. Symbiosis 2018, 75, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, T.; Hu, Y.J.; Zhang, K.; Tian, C.Y.; Guo, J.X. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve plant growth of Ricinus communis by altering photosynthetic properties and increasing pigments under drought and salt stress. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 117, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sarkar, A.; Asaeda, T.; Wang, Q.; Kaneko, Y.; Rashid, M.H. Response of Miscanthus sacchariflorus to zinc stress mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Flora 2017, 234, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, X.; Chen, B.; Zhang, X. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate arsenic toxicity to Medicago sativa by influencing arsenic speciation and partitioning. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 157, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Leifheit, E.F.; Veresoglou, S.D.; Lehmann, A.; Morris, E.K.; Rillig, M.C. Multiple factors influence the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil aggregation-a meta-analysis. Plant Soil 2014, 374, 523–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Klironomos, J.N.; Ursic, M.; Moutoglis, P.; Strietwolf Engel, R.; Boller, T.; Wiemken, A.; Sanders, I.R. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines the plant diversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 1998, 398, 39–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bever, J.D.; Schultz, P.A.; Pringle, A.; Morton, H.B. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: More diverse than meets the eye, and the ecological tale of why. Bioscience 2001, 51, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiang, J.; Moore, J.A.M.; Priyadarshi, A.; Classen, A.T. Plant-mycorrhizal interactions mediate plant community coexistence by altering resource demand. Ecology 2017, 98, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Freitas, R.O.; Buscardo, E.; Nagy, L.; Maciel, A.B.S.; Carrenho, R.; Luizão, R.C.C. Erratum to: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities along a pedo-hydrological gradient in a Central Amazonian terra firme forest. Mycorrhiza 2014, 24, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pereira, C.M.R.; Silva, D.K.A.D.; Goto, B.T.; Maia, L.C. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Atlantic forest areas under different land uses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 185, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Álvarez-Sánchez, J.; Sánchez-Gallen, I.; Hernández-Cuevas, L.; Hernández, L.; Cruz, C. What can the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community tell us about plant biodiversity loss? In Recent Advances on Mycorrhizal Fungi, Fungi Bioloyg; Pagano, M., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 23–33. [Google Scholar]
  19. Álvarez-Sánchez, J.; Johnson, N.C.; Antoninka, A.; Chaudhary, V.B.; Lau, M.K.; Owen, S.M.; Sánchez-Gallen, I.; Guadarrama, P.; Castillo, S. Large-scale diversity patterns in spore communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In Mycorrhiza: Ocurrence in Natural and Restored Environments; Pagano, M., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 29–47. [Google Scholar]
  20. Senapati, M.; Das, A.B.; Das, P. Association of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with 21 forest tree species. Indian J. For. 2000, 23, 326–331. [Google Scholar]
  21. Singh, S.S.; Tiwari, S.C.; Dkhar, M.S. Species diversity of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi in jhum fallow and natural forest soils of Arunachal Pradesh, north eastern India. Trop. Ecol. 2003, 44, 207–215. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dhar, P.P.; Mridha, M.A.U. Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations in different forest tree species of Hazarikhil forest of Chittagong, Bangladesh. J. For. Res. 2012, 23, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wubet, T.; Weiss, M.; Kottke, I.; Teketay, D.; Oberwinkler, F. Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Prunus africana, an endangered medicinal tree species in dry Afromontane forests of Ethiopia. New Phytol. 2004, 161, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Cong, L.C.; Ye, Z.S.; Lei, L.; Huang, J.S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with common tree species in a tropical rain forest in Bawangling of Hainan Island, China. Chin. J. Ecol. 2010, 29, 269–273. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tian, H.; Gai, J.P.; Zhang, J.L.; Christie, P.; Li, X.L. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with wild forage plants in typical steppe of eastern Inner Mongolia. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2009, 45, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yu, J.; Xue, Z.K.; He, X.L.; Liu, C.M.; Steinberger, Y. Shifts in composition and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and glomalin contents during revegetation of desertified semiarid grassland. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 115, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cui, X.; Hu, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, J.S.; Lin, X.G. Reclamation negatively influences arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community structure and diversity in coastal saline-alkaline land in Eastern China as revealed by Illumina sequencing. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016, 98, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, F.Y.; Liu, R.J.; Lin, X.G.; Zhou, J.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal status of wild plants in saline-alkaline soils of the Yellow River Delta. Mycorrhiza 2004, 14, 133–137. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yang, A.N.; Lu, L.; Zhang, N. The diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the subtropical forest of Huangshan (Yellow Mountain), East-Central China. World J. Microb. Biot. 2011, 27, 2351–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, H.G.; Wang, Y.J.; Tang, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi diversity associated with two halophytes Lycium barbarum L. and Elaeagnus angustifolia L. in Ningxia, China. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2016, 63, 796–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, M.Y.; Jiang, P. Colonization and diversity of AM fungi by morphological analysis on medicinal plants in southeast China. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, X.L.; Gai, J.P.; Cai, X.B.; Li, X.L.; Christie, P.; Zhang, F.Z.; Zhang, J.L. Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with two co-occurring perennial plant species on a Tibetan altitudinal gradient. Mycorrhiza 2014, 24, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jamiołkowska, A.; Księżniak, A.; Gałązka, A.; Hetman, B.; Kopacki, M.; Skwary-Bednarz, B. Impact of abiotic factors on development of the community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the soil: A Review. Int. Agrophys. 2018, 32, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Benucci, G.M.; Bonito, G.; Baciarelli Falini, L.; Bencivenga, M. Mycorrhization of pecan trees (Carya illinoinensis) with commercial truffle species: Tuber aestivum Vittad. and Tuber borchii Vittad. Mycorrhiza 2012, 22, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ding, N.N.; Wang, B.S.; Liang, Z.H.; Liu, D.H. Effects of different Amelioration measures on coastal saline soil in the David’s Deer Reserve of Dafeng County of Jiangsu province. Soils 2011, 43, 487–492. [Google Scholar]
  36. Xiao, L.; Huang, Y.M.; Zeng, Q.C.; Zhao, J.F.; Zhou, J.Y. Soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass response to crop types on the terraces of the Loess Plateau, China. J. Soil Sediment. 2018, 18, 1971–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, X.; Sun, H.; Pumpanen, J.; Sietiö, O.M.; Heinonsalo, J.; Köster, K.; Berninger, F. The impact of wildfire on the microbial C:N:P stoichiometry and the fungal-to-bacterial ratio in permafrost soil. Biogeochemistry 2019, 142, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Walkley, A.J.; Black, I.A. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gong, M.Q.; Chen, Y.L.; Zhong, C.L. Mycorrhizal Research and Application; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1997; p. 223. [Google Scholar]
  41. Oehl, F.; Sieverding, E.; Ineichen, K.; Mäder, P.; Boller, T.; Wiemken, A. Impact of land use intensity on the species diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agroecosystems of Central Europe. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2003, 69, 2816–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Morton, J.B. Taxonomy of VA mycorrhizal fungi: Classification, nomenclature, and identification. Mycotaxon 1988, 32, 267–324. [Google Scholar]
  43. Schenck, N.C.; Perez-Collins, Y. Manual for the Identification of va Mycorrhizal Fungi, 3rd ed.; Synergistic Publications: Gainesville, FL, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  44. Schüßler, A.; Walker, C. The Glomeromycota: A Species List with New Families and New Genera; Libraries at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Gloucester, Botanische Staatssammlung Munich and Oregon State University: Kew, OR, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  45. Oehl, F.; Sieverding, E.; Palenzuela, J.; Ineichen, K.; Alves da silva, G. Advances in Glomeromycota taxonomy and classification. IMA Fungus 2011, 2, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Krüger, M.; Krüger, C.; Walker, C.; Stockinger, H.; Schüßler, A. Phylogenetic reference data for systematic and phylotaxonomy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from phylum to species level. New Phytol. 2012, 193, 970–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Y.; Guo, L.D.; Liu, R.J. Survey of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in deforested and natural forest land in the subtropical region of Dujiangyan, southwest China. Plant Soil 2004, 261, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shannon, C.E.; Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 1949; pp. 623–656. [Google Scholar]
  49. Muthukumar, T.; Udaiyan, K. Arbuscular mycorrhizas of plants growing in the Western Ghats region, Southern India. Mycorrhiza 2000, 9, 297–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tawaraya, K.; Hashimoto, K.; Wagatsuma, T. Effect of root exudate fractions from P-deficient and P-sufficient onion plants on root colonisation by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora margarita. Mycorrhiza 1998, 8, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kowalska, I.K.; Konieczny, A.K.; Gastol, M.K.; Sady, W.K.; Hanusfajerska, E.K. Effect of mycorrhiza and phosphorus content in nutrient solution on the yield and nutritional status of tomato plants grown on rockwool or coconut coir. Agric. Food. Sci. 2015, 24, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gong, M.G.; Ming, T.; Zhang, Q.M.; Feng, X.X. Effects of climatic and edaphic factors on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere of Hippophae rhamnoides in the Loess Plateau, China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2012, 32, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shi, G.; Liu, Y.; Johnson, N.C.; Olsson, P.A.; Mao, L.; Cheng, G.; Jiang, S.J.; An, L.Z.; Du, G.Z.; Feng, G.Y. Interactive influence of light intensity and soil fertility on root-associated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 2014, 378, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, S.F.; He, X.L.; Chen, T.S. Ecological research of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from the rhizosphere of Raspberry and Blackberry. Acta Agric. Boreal.-Occident. Sin. 2007, 16, 219–221. [Google Scholar]
  55. Bhatia, N.P.; Sundari, K.; Adholeya, A. Diversity and selective dominance of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In Concepts in Mycorrhizal Research; Mukerji, K.G., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1996; pp. 133–178. [Google Scholar]
  56. Abbott, L.K.; Robson, A.D. Factors influencing the occurrence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1991, 35, 121–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhao, Z.W.; Wang, G.H.; Yang, L. Biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a tropical rainforest of Xishuangbanna, southwest China. Fungal Divers. 2003, 13, 233–242. [Google Scholar]
  58. Martin, J.; Bereau, M.E.; Ocampo, J.A. Arbuscular mycorrhizas in Dicorynia guianensis and Eperua falcata treesfrom primary tropical rain forest of French Guiana. Symbiosis 2001, 31, 283–291. [Google Scholar]
  59. Louis, I.; Lim, G. Spore density and root colonization of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas in tropical soil. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1987, 88, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chaiyasen, A.; Douds, D.D.; Gavinlertvatana, P.; Lumyong, S. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Tectona grandis Linn.f. plantations and their effects on growth of micropropagated plantlets. New For. 2017, 48, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Silva, I.R.; Souza, F.A.; Silva, D.K.A.; Oehl, F.; Maia, L.C. Patterns of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal distribution on mainland and island sandy coastal plain ecosystems in Brazil. Microb. Ecol. 2017, 74, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pontes, J.S.; Oehl, F.; Pereira, C.D.; Machado, C.T.; Coyne, D.; da Silva, D.K.; Maia, L.C. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the Brazilian’s Cerrado and in soybean under conservation and conventional tillage. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 117–118, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bonfim, J.A.; Gumiere, T.; Oehl, F. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a Brazilian atlantic forest toposequence. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 71, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jasper, D.A.; Abbott, L.K.; Robson, A.D. The survival of infective hyphae of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in dry soil: An interaction with sporulation. New Phytol. 1993, 124, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Öpik, M.; Moora, M.; Zobel, M.; Saks, Ü.; Wheatley, R.; Wright, F.; Daniell, T. High diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a boreal herb-rich coniferous forest. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Moreira, M.; Baretta, D.; Siumui, T.; Cardoso, E.J.B.N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in native and in replanted Araucaria forest. Sci. Agric. 2009, 66, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Hazard, C.; Gosling, P.; Gast, C.J.; Mitchell, D.T.; Doohan, F.M.; Bending, G.D. The role of local environment and geographical distance in determining community composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at the landscape scale. ISME J. 2013, 7, 498–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Murray, T.R.; Frank, D.A.; Gehring, C.A. Ungulate and topographic control of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spore community composition in a temperate grassland. Ecology 2010, 91, 815–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bonfim, J.A.; Rlf, V.; Stürmer, S.L.; Cardoso, E.J.B.N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the Brazilian Atlantic forest: A gradient of environmental restoration. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2013, 71, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ramos, A.C.; Façanha, A.R.; Feijó, J.A. Proton (H+) flux signature for the presymbiotic development of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2008, 178, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tawaraya, K.; Takaya, Y.; Turjaman, M.; Tuah, S.J.; Limin, S.H.; Tamain, Y.; Cha, J.Y.; Wagatsuma, T.; Osaki, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of tree species grown in peat swamp forests of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 182, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Silva, D.K.A.; Souza, R.G.D.; Velez, B.A.D.A.; Silva, G.A.; Oehl, F.; Maia, L.C. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on a vegetation gradient in tropical coastal dunes. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 96, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Estrada, B.; Beltrán-Hermoso, M.; Palenzuela, J.; Iwase, K.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M.; Barea, J.M.; Oehl, F. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere of Asteriscus maritimus (L.) Less., a representative plant species in arid and saline Mediterranean ecosystems. J. Arid Environ. 2013, 97, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fritz, O.; Endre, L.; Arno, B.; Karl, S.; Robert, B.; Marcel vander, H.; Ewald, S. Soil type and land use intensity determine the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 724–738. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. AMF community composition in the rhizosphere soils of different tree species. Tree species: CI, Carya illinoensis; PL, Populus lasiocarpa; MG, Metasequoia glyptostroboides; ZS, Zelkova serrata; TZ, Taxodium ‘zhongshansha’; GB, Ginkgo biloba; EP, Elaeagnus pungens.
Figure 1. AMF community composition in the rhizosphere soils of different tree species. Tree species: CI, Carya illinoensis; PL, Populus lasiocarpa; MG, Metasequoia glyptostroboides; ZS, Zelkova serrata; TZ, Taxodium ‘zhongshansha’; GB, Ginkgo biloba; EP, Elaeagnus pungens.
Forests 10 00424 g001
Figure 2. The redundancy analysis (RDA) (a) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) (b) of AMF genera and species with edaphic factors. AcauExcv, Acaulospora excavate; AcauFove, Acaulospora foveata; AcauRehm, Acaulospora rehmii; AmbsLept, Ambispora leptoticha; ClarClar, Claroideoglomus claroideum; ClarEtum, Claroideoglomus etunicatum; FunnGeos, Funneliformis geosporum; FunnMoss, Funneliformis mosseae; GlomMult, Glomus multiforum; GlomPust, Glomus pustulatum; GlomRetc, Glomus reticulatum; RhizAggr, Rhizophagus aggregatus; RhizClar, Rhizophagus clarus; Rhizintr, Rhizophagus intraradices; SeptCons, Septoglomus constrictum.
Figure 2. The redundancy analysis (RDA) (a) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) (b) of AMF genera and species with edaphic factors. AcauExcv, Acaulospora excavate; AcauFove, Acaulospora foveata; AcauRehm, Acaulospora rehmii; AmbsLept, Ambispora leptoticha; ClarClar, Claroideoglomus claroideum; ClarEtum, Claroideoglomus etunicatum; FunnGeos, Funneliformis geosporum; FunnMoss, Funneliformis mosseae; GlomMult, Glomus multiforum; GlomPust, Glomus pustulatum; GlomRetc, Glomus reticulatum; RhizAggr, Rhizophagus aggregatus; RhizClar, Rhizophagus clarus; Rhizintr, Rhizophagus intraradices; SeptCons, Septoglomus constrictum.
Forests 10 00424 g002
Table 1. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) colonization statuses of roots and spore density in the rhizosphere soils of trees.
Table 1. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) colonization statuses of roots and spore density in the rhizosphere soils of trees.
Tree SpeciesAMF Colonization/%Colonization IntensitySD (No. Per 100 g Air-Dried Soil)
RLCRLV RLARLH
CI90.3 ± 11.6 a45.6 ± 40.9 ab71.8 ± 14.3 ab81.8 ± 8.6 abMedium-strong934.7 ± 608.2 b
PL67.2 ± 35.7 a38.5 ± 38.8 ab54.7 ± 33.9 ab67.2 ± 35.9 abInferior-strong2075.7 ± 403.6 ab
MG52.1 ± 34.3 a32.2 ± 28.0 ab37.7 ± 29.9 bc47.6 ± 30.1 bInferior-medium1876.0 ± 734.0 ab
ZS73.1 ± 15.3 a39.1 ± 14.5 ab68.4 ± 25.0 ab73.1 ± 15.3 abInferior3971.0 ± 2684.9 a
TZ88.7 ± 9.8 a59.0 ± 8.7 a74.5 ± 14.6 ab86.5 ± 12.1 aMedium-strong1478.7 ± 1125.3 ab
EU87.4 ± 19.0 a31.5 ± 25.6 ab83.9 ± 24.9 a87.4 ± 19.0 aStrong4207.0 ± 3069.4 a
GB12.3 ± 15.4 b8.9 ± 9.6 b6.7 ± 5.7 c11.2 ± 13.4 cInferior-medium918.7 ± 247.4 b
EP86.7 ± 6.7 a56.7 ± 13.5 ab64.6 ± 16.6 ab86.7 ± 6.7 aMedium-strong1880.0 ± 284.0 ab
Tree species: CI, Carya illinoensis; PL, Populus lasiocarpa; MG, Metasequoia glyptostroboides; ZS, Zelkova serrata; TZ, Taxodium ‘zhongshansha’; GB, Ginkgo biloba; EP, Elaeagnus pungens. RLC, RLV, RLA, and RLH are the percentages of root length with total, vesicle, arbuscules, and hyphae colonization, respectively. SD is the spore density. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Table 2. Occurrence frequency, relative abundance, and important values of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi species for trees.
Table 2. Occurrence frequency, relative abundance, and important values of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi species for trees.
Species No.AM FungiTree SpeciesFO (%)RA (%)IV (%)
CIPLMGZSTZEUGBEP
1Acaulospora bireticulata+4.170.0082.09
2Acaulospora excavata++++258.31716.66
3Acaulospora foveata++++++++504.35227.18
4Acaulospora paulinae+4.170.0472.11
5Acaulospora rehmii+++12.50.3186.41
6Acaulospora rugosa+4.170.1242.15
7Acaulospora scrobiculata+4.170.6282.40
8Ambispora leptoticha++++26.672.21914.44
9Claroideoglomus claroideum++12.51.1566.83
10Claroideoglomus etunicatum+++++33.332.96418.15
11Claroideoglomus luteum+4.170.0312.10
12Entrophospora infrequens+4.170.2872.23
13Funneliformis geosporum+++++++37.55.84221.67
14Funneliformis mosseae+++++++37.56.30721.90
15Gigaspora decipiens+4.170.0392.10
16Glomus ambisporum+4.170.0082.09
17Glomus dolichosporum+4.170.0622.12
18Glomus microcarpum+4.170.4892.33
19Glomus monosporum+8.330.5514.44
20Glomus multicaule++8.330.6284.48
21Glomus multiforum++++16.672.8329.75
22Glomus pansihalos+4.170.7212.45
23Glomus pustulatum++++29.172.78515.98
24Glomus reticulatum++++++29.175.11217.14
25Glomus versiforme+4.170.0312.10
26Glomus sp1+4.170.1162.14
27Glomus sp2+4.170.2092.19
28Glomus sp3+4.170.0392.10
29Glomus sp4+4.170.3802.28
30Rhizophagus aggregatus+++16.673.0499.86
31Rhizophagus clarus++++29.1728.99129.08
32Rhizophagus intraradices+++20.837.14513.99
33Septoglomus constrictum+++++++54.1710.51232.34
34Septoglomus deserticola++++16.173.6629.92
35Sclerocystis sinuosa+4.170.0392.10
Species richness131212711101416
Tree species: CI, Carya illinoensis; PL, Populus lasiocarpa; MG, Metasequoia glyptostroboides; ZS, Zelkova serrata; TZ, Taxodium ‘zhongshansha’; GB, Ginkgo biloba; EP, Elaeagnus pungens. FO, RA, and IV are the frequency of occurrence, relative abundance, and importance value, respectively.
Table 3. Diversity indices of AMF communities in the rhizosphere soils of trees.
Table 3. Diversity indices of AMF communities in the rhizosphere soils of trees.
CIPLMGZSTZEUGBEP
SR6.33 ± 2.08 a5.67 ± 2.31 ab5.33 ± 0.58 ab4.00 ± 1.00 ab500 ± 1.73 ab3.33 ± 0.58 b5.67 ± 1.15 ab6.67 ± 1.53 a
H1.37 ± 0.36 a1.29 ± 0.24 ab1.52 ± 0.11 a0.81 ± 0.40 b1.11 ± 0.34 ab0.82 ± 0.10 b1.54 ± 0.17 a1.30 ± 0.31 ab
E0.76 ± 0.06 ab0.80 ± 0.11 ab0.91 ± 0.05 a0.58 ± 0.22 b0.74 ± 0.27 ab0.71 ± 0.17 ab0.89 ± 0.03 ab0.70 ± 0.19 ab
Tree species: CI, Carya illinoensis; PL, Populus lasiocarpa; MG, Metasequoia glyptostroboides; ZS, Zelkova serrata; TZ, Taxodium ‘zhongshansha’; GB, Ginkgo biloba; EP, Elaeagnus pungens. SR, H, and E are the species richness, Shannon–Wiener index, and evenness of the AMF community, respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Table 4. Chemical properties of soil in the rhizospheres of eight tree species.
Table 4. Chemical properties of soil in the rhizospheres of eight tree species.
SpeciespHSM
(%)
EC
(µS/cm)
NN
(mg/kg)
TN
(%)
AP
(mg/kg)
TP
(mg/kg)
AK
(mg/kg)
TK
(g/kg)
OM
(g/kg)
C
(%)
S
(‰)
CI8.05 a28.13 a298.3 a37.99 a0.400 ab12.50 ab854.7 b156.4 a14.35 a4.23 c1.60 c0.285 abc
PL7.95 a21.22 ab259.0 a35.47 a0.300 ab1.75 b737.0 b134.2 a15.54 a4.91 c1.67 bc0.252 abcd
MG7.78 a22.71 ab200.6 a52.43 a0.253 ab17.11 a906.5 b175.9 a14.40 a11.32 ab2.00 ab0.299 ab
ZS7.77 a29.26 a248.3 a33.72 a0.297 ab2.31 b829.5 b184.6 a13.46 a12.87 a2.20 a0.307 a
TZ7.97 a20.04 ab191.1 a26.63 a0.327 ab3.00 b788.9 b110.9 a15.60 a5.26 bc1.72 bc0.225 cd
EU7.88 a14.78 b178.4 a69.14 a0.187 b4.93 b811.8 b167.1 a13.96 a7.09 abc1.84 abc0.232 bcd
GB8.13 a19.89 b145.6 a38.24 a0.417 ab7.77 ab1272.8 a134.4 a14.06 a2.98 c1.58 c0.192 d
EP8.11 a25.75 ab180.4 a13.48 a0.727 a6.07 b931.9 b120.2 a14.02 a4.35 c1.73 bc0.215 cd
Tree species: CI, Carya illinoensis; PL, Populus lasiocarpa; MG, Metasequoia glyptostroboides; ZS, Zelkova serrata; TZ, Taxodium ‘zhongshansha’; GB, Ginkgo biloba; EP, Elaeagnus pungens. SM, organic matter; EC, soil electric conductivity; NN, nitrate nitrogen content; TN, soil total nitrogen; AP, available phosphorus; TP, total phosphorus; AK, available potassium; TK, total potassium; OM, organic matter; C, total carbon; S, total sulfur. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Table 5. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between AMF community parameters and edaphic factors.
Table 5. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between AMF community parameters and edaphic factors.
pHSMECNNTNAPTPAKTKOMCS
RLC−0.092−0.0440.067−0.2460.086−0.112−0.635 **−0.0940.284−0.051−0.0060.170
RLV−0.220−0.061−0.045−0.2660.235−0.161−0.378−0.1900.483 *−0.030−0.0260.067
RLA−0.151−0.1510.030−0.2230.033−0.184−0.568 **−0.0760.1920.0290.0280.163
RLH−0.105−0.0600.078−0.2330.081−0.173−0.627 **−0.1140.298−0.0200.0190.160
COI0.331−0.417 *−0.2570.020−0.018−0.064−0.269−0.1010.400−0.467 *−0.496 *−0.453 *
SD−0.112−0.340−0.074−0.020−0.1170.012−0.056−0.074−0.1150.1000.034−0.038
SR0.478 *0.006−0.337−0.2910.279−0.0050.095−0.129−0.074−0.300−0.415 *−0.373
H0.1690.002−0.332−0.1020.2740.3180.374−0.215−0.130−0.316−0.408 *−0.305
E−0.146−0.004−0.1310.1150.1210.3650.346−0.212−0.028−0.228−0.218−0.099
Acaulospora0.169−0.108−0.232−0.031−0.072−0.009−0.2480.179−0.1100.2160.198−0.041
Ambispora−0.108−0.445 *−0.1260.051−0.1900.272−0.037−0.026−0.069−0.002−0.033−0.076
Claroideoglomus0.600 **0.2320.274−0.1160.1040.0660.000−0.0550.070−0.280−0.3290.011
Funneliformis−0.211−0.0800.0920.3680.012−0.056−0.0620.009−0.033−0.326−0.086−0.148
Glomus0.047−0.099−0.087−0.1690.050−0.2310.048−0.1680.483 *−0.0190.0500.003
Rhizophagus−0.360−0.0260.148−0.108−0.039−0.099−0.0730.110−0.2150.3470.3340.295
Septoglomus−0.243−0.415 *−0.151−0.063−0.0800.073−0.1030.055−0.2630.2740.2150.027
Glomeraceae−0.394−0.1750.078−0.074−0.036−0.142−0.0870.059−0.1160.2820.3280.220
SM, organic matter; EC, soil electric conductivity; NN, nitrate nitrogen content; TN, soil total nitrogen; AP, available phosphorus; TP, total phosphorus; AK, available potassium; TK, total potassium; OM, organic matter; C, total carbon; S, total sulfur. RLC, RLV, RLA, and RLH are percentages of root length with total, vesicle, arbuscules, and hyphae colonization, respectively. COI, colonization intensity; SD, spore density; SR, H, and E are species richness, Shannon–Wiener index, and evenness of the AMF community, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Wang, G.G.; Zhang, B.; Yuan, Z.; Fu, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Zhu, L.; Ma, S.; Zhang, J. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Tree Species in a Planted Forest of Eastern China. Forests 2019, 10, 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10050424

AMA Style

Wang J, Wang GG, Zhang B, Yuan Z, Fu Z, Yuan Y, Zhu L, Ma S, Zhang J. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Tree Species in a Planted Forest of Eastern China. Forests. 2019; 10(5):424. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10050424

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jinping, G. Geoff Wang, Bo Zhang, Zhongming Yuan, Zhiyuan Fu, Yingdan Yuan, Lingjun Zhu, Shilin Ma, and Jinchi Zhang. 2019. "Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Tree Species in a Planted Forest of Eastern China" Forests 10, no. 5: 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10050424

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop