Next Article in Journal
The Implications of Derisking: The Case of Malta, a Small EU State
Next Article in Special Issue
Women on Boards and Firm Performance: A Microeconometric Search for a Connection
Previous Article in Journal
Capital Structure and Firm Performance in Australian Service Sector Firms: A Panel Data Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bankruptcy Prediction with the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis: An Empirical Study of Slovak Businesses
Article

Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Comparative Analysis between Listed Family and Non-Family Firms in Japan

1
School of International Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University, Nishinomiya 662-8501, Japan
2
Doshisha Business School, Doshisha University, Kyoto 6028580, Japan
3
Zurich Insurance Company Ltd, Tokyo 1640003, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13(9), 215; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13090215
Received: 19 August 2020 / Revised: 10 September 2020 / Accepted: 15 September 2020 / Published: 18 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corporate Finance)
This study aims to explore the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance of publicly listed family and non-family firms in the Japanese manufacturing industry. The study obtains data from Bloomberg over the period 2014–2018 and covers 1412 firms comprising of 861 non-family and 551 family firms. Our results show that family firms outperform non-family counterparts in terms of return on assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q when a univariate analysis is invoked. On multivariate analysis, family firms show superior performance to non-family firms with Tobin’s Q. However, family ownership negates firm performance when ROA is taken into account. Regarding the impact of governance elements on Tobin’s Q, institutional shareholding appears to be a significant and positive factor for promoting the performance of both family and non-family firms. Furthermore, board size encourages the performance of non-family firms, while such influence is not observed for family firms. In terms of ROA, foreign ownership inspires the performance of both family and non-family firms. Moreover, government ownership stimulates the performance of family firms, while board independence significantly negates the same. Besides, we find that the performance of family firms run by the founder’s descendants is superior to that of family firms run by the founder. These findings have critical policy implications for family firms in Japan. View Full-Text
Keywords: family firm; non-family firm; corporate governance; corporate performance; Japan family firm; non-family firm; corporate governance; corporate performance; Japan
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Koji, K.; Adhikary, B.K.; Tram, L. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Comparative Analysis between Listed Family and Non-Family Firms in Japan. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13090215

AMA Style

Koji K, Adhikary BK, Tram L. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Comparative Analysis between Listed Family and Non-Family Firms in Japan. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2020; 13(9):215. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13090215

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koji, Kojima, Bishnu K. Adhikary, and Le Tram. 2020. "Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Comparative Analysis between Listed Family and Non-Family Firms in Japan" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 13, no. 9: 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13090215

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop