Next Article in Journal
Environmental Surveillance. An Additional/Alternative Approach for Virological Surveillance in Greece?
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Long Term Impact of Phosphorus Fertilization on Phosphorus Loadings Using AnnAGNPS
Previous Article in Journal
Distributional Benefit Analysis of a National Air Quality Rule
Previous Article in Special Issue
Arsenic in Soils and Forages from Poultry Litter-Amended Pastures
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8(6), 1893-1913;

Effect of Manure vs. Fertilizer Inputs on Productivity of Forage Crop Models

Unit for Extensive Animal Production, Research Council of Agriculture, Via Appia-Bella Scalo, 74085, Muro Lucano, Italy
Centre of Meat Production Breeding, Research Council of Agriculture, Via Salaria 31, 00015, Monterotondo, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 March 2011 / Accepted: 4 May 2011 / Published: 1 June 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Pollution: Prevention and Mitigation)
Full-Text   |   PDF [392 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]


Manure produced by livestock activity is a dangerous product capable of causing serious environmental pollution. Agronomic management practices on the use of manure may transform the target from a waste to a resource product. Experiments performed on comparison of manure with standard chemical fertilizers (CF) were studied under a double cropping per year regime (alfalfa, model I; Italian ryegrass-corn, model II; barley-seed sorghum, model III; and horse-bean-silage sorghum, model IV). The total amount of manure applied in the annual forage crops of the model II, III and IV was 158, 140 and 80 m3 ha−1, respectively. The manure applied to soil by broadcast and injection procedure provides an amount of nitrogen equal to that supplied by CF. The effect of manure applications on animal feeding production and biochemical soil characteristics was related to the models. The weather condition and manures and CF showed small interaction among treatments. The number of MFU ha−1 of biomass crop gross product produced in autumn and spring sowing models under manure applications was 11,769, 20,525, 11,342, 21,397 in models I through IV, respectively. The reduction of MFU ha−1 under CF ranges from 10.7% to 13.2% those of the manure models. The effect of manure on organic carbon and total nitrogen of topsoil, compared to model I, stressed the parameters as CF whose amount was higher in models II and III than model IV. In term of percentage the organic carbon and total nitrogen of model I and treatment with manure was reduced by about 18.5 and 21.9% in model II and model III and 8.8 and 6.3% in model IV, respectively. Manure management may substitute CF without reducing gross production and sustainability of cropping systems, thus allowing the opportunity to recycle the waste product for animal forage feeding. View Full-Text
Keywords: manure; crop models; cropping system; silage and seed production; MFU ha−1 manure; crop models; cropping system; silage and seed production; MFU ha−1
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Annicchiarico, G.; Caternolo, G.; Rossi, E.; Martiniello, P. Effect of Manure vs. Fertilizer Inputs on Productivity of Forage Crop Models. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 1893-1913.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top