Next Article in Journal
Local Heat Stroke Prevention Plans in Japan: Characteristics and Elements for Public Health Adaptation to Climate Change
Next Article in Special Issue
Essential Questions on Suicide Bereavement and Postvention
Previous Article in Journal
Mass Casualties and Health Care Following the Release of Toxic Chemicals or Radioactive Material—Contribution of Modern Biotechnology
Previous Article in Special Issue
MATES in Construction: Impact of a Multimodal, Community-Based Program for Suicide Prevention in the Construction Industry

Controlling Access to Suicide Means

Department of Health Sciences, University of Molise, Via De Sanctis, Campobasso 86100, Italy
Institute of Psychiatry, University of Bologna, 5 V.le C. Pepoli, Bologna 40133, Italy
Psychiatry Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, 385 Tremont Ave., East Orange, NJ 07018, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8(12), 4550-4562;
Received: 27 October 2011 / Revised: 15 November 2011 / Accepted: 29 November 2011 / Published: 7 December 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Suicide Prevention and Public Health)
Background: Restricting access to common means of suicide, such as firearms, toxic gas, pesticides and other, has been shown to be effective in reducing rates of death in suicide. In the present review we aimed to summarize the empirical and clinical literature on controlling the access to means of suicide. Methods: This review made use of both MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science and the Cochrane library databases, identifying all English articles with the keywords “suicide means”, “suicide method”, “suicide prediction” or “suicide prevention” and other relevant keywords. Results: A number of factors may influence an individual’s decision regarding method in a suicide act, but there is substantial support that easy access influences the choice of method. In many countries, restrictions of access to common means of suicide has lead to lower overall suicide rates, particularly regarding suicide by firearms in USA, detoxification of domestic and motor vehicle gas in England and other countries, toxic pesticides in rural areas, barriers at jumping sites and hanging, by introducing “safe rooms” in prisons and hospitals. Moreover, decline in prescription of barbiturates and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), as well as limitation of drugs pack size for paracetamol and salicylate has reduced suicides by overdose, while increased prescription of SSRIs seems to have lowered suicidal rates. Conclusions: Restriction to means of suicide may be particularly effective in contexts where the method is popular, highly lethal, widely available, and/or not easily substituted by other similar methods. However, since there is some risk of means substitution, restriction of access should be implemented in conjunction with other suicide prevention strategies. View Full-Text
Keywords: suicide; means of suicide; restriction of means suicide; means of suicide; restriction of means
MDPI and ACS Style

Sarchiapone, M.; Mandelli, L.; Iosue, M.; Andrisano, C.; Roy, A. Controlling Access to Suicide Means. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 4550-4562.

AMA Style

Sarchiapone M, Mandelli L, Iosue M, Andrisano C, Roy A. Controlling Access to Suicide Means. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2011; 8(12):4550-4562.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sarchiapone, Marco, Laura Mandelli, Miriam Iosue, Costanza Andrisano, and Alec Roy. 2011. "Controlling Access to Suicide Means" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 8, no. 12: 4550-4562.

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop