Next Article in Journal
Scientific Evidence in Public Health Decision-Making: A Systematic Literature Review of the Past 50 Years
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Different Types of Social Resources on Coping Self-Efficacy and Distress During Australia’s Black Summer Bushfires
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Nutrition Communication in Early Childhood Education Settings: Overcoming Challenges and Promoting Collaboration with Caregivers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

System Mapping of Farm-to-School Partnerships to Enhance Student Access to Healthy, Local Foods

by
Melissa Guillen
1 and
Katherine E. Soule
2,*
1
Cooperative Extension in San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura Counties, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93110, USA
2
Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(9), 1342; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091342
Submission received: 31 May 2025 / Revised: 6 August 2025 / Accepted: 22 August 2025 / Published: 27 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Healthy Diet and Nutrition during Childhood and Adolescence)

Abstract

Farm-to-school (F2S) partnerships connect schools with local producers to enhance student access to healthy, local foods and support regional food systems. Despite widespread implementation, few studies have examined the system-level structures that facilitate effective and sustainable F2S efforts across diverse community contexts. This study utilized a mixed-methods system mapping approach to analyze four F2S systems on California’s Central Coast. Data sources included public data sources, in-person site observations, and local expert resources. The researchers hypothesized that successful F2S systems would share core features that support implementation and long-term sustainability, including aligned values among stakeholders, the presence of identified champions, and multi-directional pathways for food procurement and communication. They constructed system maps and compared them in order to identify both common structural features and context-specific adaptations. Findings support the hypothesis and highlight the critical role of community-based organizations and distributors and/or aggregators in brokering relationships, coordinating resources, and reducing administrative burdens. Institutionalization through wellness policy integration and district-level support further distinguished higher-functioning systems. Identified barriers included inequities in procurement infrastructure, limited funder engagement, and uneven access to local food sources. System mapping offers a valuable tool to understand, strengthen, and scale equitable F2S implementation.
Keywords: farm-to-school; student nutrition; nutrition behaviors farm-to-school; student nutrition; nutrition behaviors

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guillen, M.; Soule, K.E. System Mapping of Farm-to-School Partnerships to Enhance Student Access to Healthy, Local Foods. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091342

AMA Style

Guillen M, Soule KE. System Mapping of Farm-to-School Partnerships to Enhance Student Access to Healthy, Local Foods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025; 22(9):1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guillen, Melissa, and Katherine E. Soule. 2025. "System Mapping of Farm-to-School Partnerships to Enhance Student Access to Healthy, Local Foods" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 22, no. 9: 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091342

APA Style

Guillen, M., & Soule, K. E. (2025). System Mapping of Farm-to-School Partnerships to Enhance Student Access to Healthy, Local Foods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(9), 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop