Next Article in Journal
The Development of the CAIRDE General Awareness Training
Previous Article in Journal
Cultural Adaptation of the Mothers and Babies Online Course: A Delphi Study for Black Mothers with Preterm Infants
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Need for Culturally Responsive Nutritional Counselling for Pregnant Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women in Australia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Governance in Crisis: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Global Health Governance During COVID-19

by
Kadria Ali Abdel-Motaal
and
Sungsoo Chun
*
Institute of Global Health and Human Ecology, American University, New Cairo 11835, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(8), 1305; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081305
Submission received: 14 June 2025 / Revised: 7 August 2025 / Accepted: 15 August 2025 / Published: 20 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancing Health Equity: Challenges and Opportunities)

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed major structural deficiencies in global health governance, including stark inequities in vaccine access, intervention timing, and mortality outcomes. While economic resources played a role, the influence of governance performance remains insufficiently examined. This study addresses a significant gap by integrating governance metrics with pandemic response data to assess how governance quality, independent of income level, affected national outcomes. Although the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) dataset has been widely used to document policy responses, this study offers a novel contribution by linking these policy interventions with governance performance and evaluating their joint effect on health outcomes and vaccine equity. Methods: This mixed-methods study combines quantitative analysis of global datasets with a qualitative literature review. Quantitative data were mainly obtained from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT), the World Bank’s Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGIs), and World Bank/WHO databases. A governance performance index was constructed using two WGI components: Government Effectiveness and Regulatory Quality. Countries were grouped into high, medium, or low governance categories. Statistical tests included ANOVA, Kaplan Meier survival analysis, and multivariable OLS regression. The qualitative component reviewed 45 academic and institutional sources on governance performance during COVID-19. Results: Countries with high governance performance had earlier public health interventions, lower mortality, and broader vaccine coverage, independent of income level. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed faster school closures in these countries (p < 0.01). Multivariable regression showed governance remained a significant predictor after adjusting for income and health spending. Qualitative findings highlighted recurring weaknesses in legal enforceability, intergovernmental coordination, and global financing mechanisms. Conclusion: Governance performance had a decisive impact on pandemic outcomes. The COVID-19 crisis revealed the need for robust governance systems capable of responding to complex emergencies that extend beyond the health sector into institutional, economic, and social spheres.
Keywords: Global Health Governance; pandemic response; COVID-19; governance effectiveness Global Health Governance; pandemic response; COVID-19; governance effectiveness

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdel-Motaal, K.A.; Chun, S. Governance in Crisis: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Global Health Governance During COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081305

AMA Style

Abdel-Motaal KA, Chun S. Governance in Crisis: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Global Health Governance During COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025; 22(8):1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081305

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdel-Motaal, Kadria Ali, and Sungsoo Chun. 2025. "Governance in Crisis: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Global Health Governance During COVID-19" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 22, no. 8: 1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081305

APA Style

Abdel-Motaal, K. A., & Chun, S. (2025). Governance in Crisis: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Global Health Governance During COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(8), 1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081305

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop