Next Article in Journal
Resettlement Workforce Perspectives on Mental Health Care of Refugees
Previous Article in Journal
Benefits of Multimodal Exercise Intervention for BDNF and Cytokines Levels, Cognitive Function, and Motor Functionality in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Preliminary Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Maternal Satisfaction with Perinatal Care and Breastfeeding at 6 Months Postpartum

by
Caitlin M. Dressler
1,
Karina M. Shreffler
1,*,
Ingrid R. Wilhelm
1,
Jameca R. Price
2 and
Karen P. Gold
2
1
Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73117, USA
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, OK 74135, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(8), 1246; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081246
Submission received: 1 July 2025 / Revised: 31 July 2025 / Accepted: 7 August 2025 / Published: 9 August 2025

Abstract

Positive childbirth experiences increase breastfeeding in the early postpartum period. Using a diverse, clinic-based sample of predominately low-income women (n = 118) recruited at their first prenatal appointment in 2017–2018 and followed through six months postpartum, binary logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between maternal satisfaction with perinatal care measured two weeks postpartum and breastfeeding at six months postpartum. Participants reported high satisfaction with perinatal care overall (mean = 25.7; range of 6–30), and 25% of participants reported breastfeeding at six months postpartum. Regression results found that greater satisfaction with perinatal care is associated with higher odds of breastfeeding at six months postpartum (OR = 1.19; p < 0.05), controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. These findings that have important implications for providers as they identify a group at risk for shorter breastfeeding duration: those who are less satisfied with their perinatal care. More research is needed to identify methods providers can use to increase satisfaction with care as well as to successfully encourage and assist mothers with breastfeeding despite challenges that might arise during pregnancy or childbirth that are associated with low satisfaction.

1. Introduction

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and World Health Organization (WHO) recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life and continued breastfeeding through the first two years of life while transitioning to solid foods [1,2]. Despite the recommendation to exclusively breastfeed for six months, only about 25% of new mothers obtain this goal in the United States [3]. Breastfeeding is well-known to improve the short- and long-term health of both women and their children [4,5]. Breastfeeding that meets recommended exclusivity and duration is often a goal of childbearing women and their healthcare providers [6]. Supporting women to initiate and sustain breastfeeding through at least six months is critical for public health [7,8].
Research examining risks for early cessation of breastfeeding often focuses on hospital practices, cultural differences, or personal characteristics that might not be modifiable such as age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and maternal employment [9]. To facilitate sustained breastfeeding, it is critical to identify predisposing influences on breastfeeding duration that are susceptible to intervention [10]. The influence of maternity care practices is a continued area of foci and surveillance via the CDC’s national survey of Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care (mPINC), and the annual CDC Breastfeeding Report Card [3,11]. While there is expansive literature investigating the influence of perinatal care practices and a variety of psychosocial predictors of breastfeeding [12,13,14,15,16], there are only a few that examine how maternal satisfaction with perinatal experiences are related to long-term breastfeeding success [17,18,19,20].
The perinatal period and childbirth experience can have an important impact on the physical and mental health of the mother and the wellbeing of the family [21,22,23]. The care that physicians and nurses provide during the prenatal period, childbirth, and immediately after impact the experience a woman attributes to the birth of her child [22,24,25]. Positive experiences lead to greater maternal self-efficacy, confidence, competence, and decreased levels of stress and anxiety [25,26]. A woman whose perinatal care experiences support psychosocial development that closely aligns with her needs results in neurocognitive changes that result in richer, more supportive environments for the infant [25]. Negative childbirth experiences, on the other hand, can lead to feelings of powerlessness [27], increased levels of stress [28], and depression [29]. These can often alter the interactions between a mother and her child [30]; postnatal depression, for example, can have long-term consequences for infants’ impaired cognitive and emotional development [31].
Positive childbirth experiences [32,33] and hospital practices encouraging breastfeeding within the first hour after birth, exclusive breastmilk feeding while in the hospital, rooming in, no pacifier unless medically indicated, and community postpartum lactation support [3,11,13,15,24,34] increase breastfeeding during the early postpartum period. Less is known, however, regarding the association between maternal satisfaction with care across the perinatal period and sustained breastfeeding outcomes. Yet, it is clear that providers have the potential to directly influence breastfeeding tendencies in mothers [9]. When non-medically indicated supplementation with formula is recommended by the pediatrician, women are more likely to cease exclusive breastfeeding [14,35]. Alternatively, supportive providers increase breastfeeding duration by educating women about current national goals and recommendations for breastfeeding duration [3,36]. Patients often rely on their healthcare professionals to provide recommendations regarding their health behaviors that will benefit their overall health and offer solutions when they experience difficulties. This relationship is often built over time between the patient and provider. The quality of communication between the healthcare professional and a mother can impact the satisfaction of care received during the childbirth experience [37], and it can have a direct influence on breastfeeding self-efficacy and subsequent duration [38]. During pregnancy and childbirth, the patient relies on her provider to provide the most recent evidence-based care. During this critical time, providers are positioned to support mothers and facilitate the development of optimum breastfeeding behaviors through interactions that may influence new mothers’ satisfaction with care.
The present study uses longitudinal data to examine the causal impact of maternal satisfaction with perinatal care following childbirth and breastfeeding at six months postpartum. We expect that mothers with greater satisfaction with care will have higher odds of breastfeeding at six months postpartum. The results of the study are vital to inform healthcare practices that have the potential to improve maternal satisfaction with perinatal care and increase the odds of continued breastfeeding into the postpartum period.

2. Materials and Methods

This study applied quantitative analysis of longitudinal survey data to explore the association between maternal satisfaction with perinatal care and breastfeeding at six months postpartum. This study draws from a diverse and primarily low-income sample of 177 mothers, aged 16–38, recruited from two university-affiliated women’s health clinics in a metropolitan area in the South-Central United States. The goal of the larger study was to identify risk and protective factors for maternal and child health outcomes. Participants were recruited at their first prenatal visit in 2017–2018 and followed through their pregnancies and after delivery to 22 months postpartum, participating in up to nine survey assessments. The sample for the current study includes the 118 participants who continued participation through the sixth assessment, occurring at six months postpartum. A majority of the participants reported a historically marginalized racial/ethnic identity (40% non-Hispanic White (n = 47); 28% Black (n = 35); 13% Hispanic (n = 16); 17% Native American (n = 20)), and nearly 90% reported using public insurance to pay for their perinatal care.
Following approval from the Institutional Review Boards from the two participating universities, potential participants were approached based on screening questions by nursing staff members. Screening items included being 16 weeks pregnant or less, planning to continue the pregnancy and be a primary caregiver, and being between 15 and 45 years of age. Those who were potentially interested in participating were transferred to members of the research team, who informed potential participants of the study’s purpose and procedures and signed informed consent (or assent and parental consent from participants under 18) obtained from those who wished to participate. Following enrollment, participants were texted survey links via REDCap and compensated between $25–50 USD each time surveys were completed.
Measures for this study come from the first, fourth, and sixth assessment, conducted at the first prenatal visit, approximately two weeks post-birth, and six months post birth, respectively. The primary independent variable, satisfaction with perinatal care, was assessed at two-weeks post-birth via a six-item survey that is a section of the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey (MES) [39]. The development of the MES was initiated by the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System with the goal of surveying new mothers on the experiences surrounding pregnancy, birth and immediate postpartum period. The MES questionnaire has been tested for reliability and validity and provides high quality data regarding women’s childbirth experiences [39]. The section of the survey used for this study asked participants to rank their overall satisfaction with the interactions with their healthcare providers regarding the information given to them, compassion and understanding, competency, the concern for their privacy, the respect shown to the patient, and the patients’ involvement in making decisions with the healthcare provider [40]. Six items are used to assess satisfaction with perinatal care on a 5-point Likert scale, with scores that range from 6 to 30, with 6 indicating low satisfaction and a score of 30 signaling high satisfaction. This sample also ranged from 6 to 30, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.96, indicating high reliability of the scale.
Sustained breastfeeding, the dependent variable of this study, was measured at 6 months postpartum as a dichotomous variable (1 = yes; 0 = no) based on the survey question, “Are you currently breastfeeding?”
Several sociodemographic variables previously associated with breastfeeding behaviors were used as control variables for this study and were collected at the participant’s first prenatal appointment. These include maternal age measured in years. Marital status was coded as a dichotomous variable where 1 = married and 0 = single. Race/ethnicity was coded into dummy variables using Census priority coding guidelines for Native American, Hispanic, and Black participants, with non-Hispanic White as the reference category; and parity coded from 0 to 9 children. Due to little variation in participants’ income levels with nearly 90% reporting public insurance, income was not included as a control variable for the study. Instead, we used an indicator of economic hardship; participants were asked if they experienced hardships in the past 12 months, such as homelessness, food insecurity, and not being able to pay for utility bills. “Yes” responses were coded as a 1 and summed to create an index of economic hardship ranging from 0 to 7.
Binary logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between maternal satisfaction with perinatal care measured two weeks postpartum and breastfeeding at six months postpartum, controlling for maternal age, economic hardship, race/ethnicity, marital status, and number of children.

3. Results

Descriptive statistics are included in Table 1. Approximately 25% of participants reported continuing to breastfeed at six months postpartum. Although the range of satisfaction with perinatal care spanned the full range, the average score was quite high (M = 25.73; SD = 4.91), indicating fairly high satisfaction with perinatal care on average. As mentioned above, the sample was comprised of a majority of participants from historically disadvantaged racial/ethnic and income status groups. On average, participants experienced nearly two economic hardship events in the past year (M = 1.91; SD = 2.23), and 28% reported being married at the time of the first survey assessment. On average, participants had at least one child (M = 1.3; SD = 1.5).
Approximately half of participants rated their satisfaction with their perinatal care providers as “very satisfied” on each of the scale items. See Figure 1 for the distribution of responses to the satisfaction with perinatal care scale items.
The logistic regression analysis (see Table 2) examined the association between satisfaction with perinatal care following birth and the odds of sustained breastfeeding at six months postpartum. We found that greater satisfaction with perinatal care was associated with higher odds of continued breastfeeding at six months postpartum (OR = 1.19; p < 0.05), controlling for maternal age, economic hardship, race/ethnicity, marital status, and number of children. Marital status (OR = 2.83; p < 0.05) also was associated with increased odds of breastfeeding at six months postpartum, but we did not find other significant associations between control variables and odds of breastfeeding.

4. Discussion

This study supports our hypothesis that maternal satisfaction with her prenatal and childbirth care is related to her likelihood of continued breastfeeding at six months postpartum. Although a considerable body of research has investigated predictors of breastfeeding previously, most studies focused on breastfeeding initiation or relied on retrospective reports of breastfeeding duration, resulting in overestimation of duration [41]. Additionally, prior studies have examined how baby friendly hospital practices influence breastfeeding outcomes, but they did not emphasize maternal perceptions of satisfaction with her perinatal care. The present study shows the importance of maternal perceptions of healthcare providers and patient interactions for successful breastfeeding behaviors in a diverse and predominately low-income sample. The relatively low rate of continued breastfeeding at six months—25% of participants in our sample—is comparable to rates among similar samples, such as mothers living in the South, those who report Black racial identity, and those living below the poverty line [42].
This study highlights that perinatal care and interactions between healthcare providers and their patients are critical to facilitating optimum breastfeeding behaviors. This is a similar finding to others that have found that perinatal care is critical for breastfeeding initiation and exclusivity in the early postpartum period. For example, breastfeeding withing the first hour of life has been associated with greater self-efficacy and duration of breastfeeding [38]. Early initiation of breastfeeding is still a barrier for healthcare staff following the delivery of a newborn. The World Health Organization/UNICEF has administered the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) with the development of the 10 Steps to Successful Breastfeeding [34]. This initiative was developed to assist healthcare facilities that care for women and children to implement healthcare practices that protect and promote breastfeeding. Studies on the effectiveness of BFHI found that hospital staff showed competence in explaining the benefits of and how to manage breastfeeding [37,43]; and mothers roomed in with the infant, the infant was only given breastmilk, and pacifiers were not used [15]. Despite the BFHI program being initiated over 25 years ago, these practices have yet to be standardized as a public health policy and only 26.86% of annual U.S. births occur in BFHI-designated hospitals [44]. Maternal perceptions of support for breastfeeding are higher when hospitals are designated as Baby-Friendly [45], but prior studies have not yet examined the association between BFHI-designation and broader maternal satisfaction with perinatal care. Future research is needed to examine whether the mechanism underscoring the influence of BFHI on breastfeeding outcomes might be due in part to maternal perceptions of care and the provider–patient relationship.

4.1. Strengths and Limitations

This study fills a gap in the literature by exploring the importance of maternal satisfaction with perinatal care on continued breastfeeding at six months postpartum. The current study has several notable strengths, including a diverse sample of low-income women recruited during pregnancy and followed into the postpartum period. The sample predominately comprises participants with demographic characteristics associated with considerably lower rates of breastfeeding than the national average [42]. Identifying factors associated with breastfeeding at six months postpartum among this sample is important for future intervention efforts among similar populations. Further, rather than relying on retrospective reports of satisfaction with care or breastfeeding duration, the study is prospective and captures maternal satisfaction with perinatal care following birth and current breastfeeding at six months postpartum.
Despite its strengths, this study has several limitations due to study assessments that should be addressed in future research. First, the measure of satisfaction with perinatal care was only assessed following birth and did not specify specific care providers. Future research should examine maternal perceptions of perinatal care across the prenatal period, not only following childbirth. Additionally, the measures should ask if responses are given in reference to one key provider or multiple providers. Second, our data only included a measure of continued breastfeeding at six months postpartum as opposed to exclusivity of breastfeeding or a calendar. Future research should examine exclusivity as well as duration of breastfeeding beyond six months postpartum. It might be useful to employ event history analysis to examine duration of breastfeeding, which would enable a more sensitive analysis of breastfeeding duration.

4.2. Implications of Study Findings

This study has important implications for healthcare system practices and for providers who work with women during pregnancy. Although there has been considerable attention on the importance of hospital practices for breastfeeding outcomes as noted above, our results highlight the need for greater emphasis on provider–patient interactions and communication. Maternal satisfaction with various domains of perinatal care including information, compassion, and respect shown by providers has long-term implications for breastfeeding outcomes. Ensuring that providers are aware of the long-term benefits of a positive provider–patient relationship can help promote outcomes such as breastfeeding that endure beyond the childbirth experience.

5. Conclusions

Positive childbirth experiences increase breastfeeding behaviors in the first six months of the postpartum period. Breastfeeding has numerous lifelong health benefits for both mothers and newborns and should be promoted by perinatal healthcare providers. This study found that maternal satisfaction with prenatal and childbirth care predicted greater odds of sustained breastfeeding through six months postpartum. This study highlights the importance of provider interaction, communication, and caregiving behaviors for breastfeeding outcomes. As breastfeeding duration continues to fall below national recommendations, identifying and promoting caregiving practices that promote sustained breastfeeding are an important target for intervention.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.P.G. and K.M.S.; methodology, K.M.S., J.R.P. and K.P.G.; formal analysis, K.M.S.; investigation, C.M.D., K.M.S., I.R.W., J.R.P. and K.P.G.; data curation, K.M.S., J.R.P. and K.P.G.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.D., K.M.S. and I.R.W.; writing—review and editing, C.M.D., K.M.S., I.R.W., J.R.P. and K.P.G.; supervision, K.M.S.; project administration, K.M.S.; funding acquisition, K.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health [P20GM109097]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the National Institutes of Health. K.M. Shreffler was supported by the Fran and Earl Ziegler Endowed Chair in Nursing Research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Institutional Review Board (IRB #7954 and date of 3 July 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Parental consent was also obtained for participants under 18.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2022 annual conference of the Midwestern Nursing Research Society in Schaumburg, IL. For more information, contact: Karina M. Shreffler, College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1100 N. Stonewall Ave., Oklahoma City, OK 73117. Phone: 405-271-2420, ext. 49237. Email: karina-shreffler@ouhsc.edu.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare at this time.

References

  1. Younger-Meek, J.; Noble, L. Technical report: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 2022, 150, e2022057989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization. The Optimal Duration of Exclusive Breastfeeding: Report of the Expert Consultation. Available online: https://apps.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/WHO_NHD_01.09/en/index.html (accessed on 24 July 2025).
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care (mPINCTM) Survey. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding-data/mpinc/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/mpinc/index.htm (accessed on 6 August 2025).
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding Benefits Both Baby and Mom. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/features/breastfeeding-benefits.html (accessed on 24 July 2025).
  5. Pathirana, M.M.; Andraweera, P.H.; Aldridge, E.; Harrison, M.; Harrison, J.; Leemaqz, S.; Arstall, M.A.; Dekker, G.A.; Roberts, C.T. The association of breast feeding for at least six months with hemodynamic and metabolic health of women and their children aged three years: An observational cohort study. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2023, 18, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. World Health Organization. Continued Breastfeeding for Healthy Growth and Development. Available online: https://www.who.int/tools/elena/interventions/continued-breastfeeding (accessed on 24 July 2025).
  7. Pan American Health Organization. Strengthening Maternal and Child Health Through Improved Breastfeeding Practices. Available online: https://www.paho.org/en/news/15-6-2025-strengthening-maternal-and-child-health-through-improved-breastfeeding-practices (accessed on 24 July 2025).
  8. Goldstein, I.; Sadaka, Y.; Amit, G.; Kasir, N.; Bourgeron, T.; Warrier, V.; Akiva, P.; Tsadok, M.A.; Zimmerman, D.R. Breastfeeding duration and child development. JAMA Netw. Open 2025, 8, e251540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dieterich, C.M.; Felice, J.P.; O’Sullivan, E.; Rasmussen, K.M. Breastfeeding and health outcomes for the mother-infant dyad. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 60, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dennis, C.E.; Faux, S. Development and psychometric testing of the breastfeeding self-efficacy scale. Res. Nurs. Health 1999, 22, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding Report Card United States. 2020. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding-data/media/pdfs/2024/05/2020-breastfeeding-report-card-h.pdf (accessed on 6 August 2025).
  12. Dabritz, H.A.; Hinton, B.G.; Babb, J. Maternal hospital experiences associated with breastfeeding at 6 months in a northern California county. J. Hum. Lact. 2010, 26, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jones, R.; Jones, L.; Feary, A.-M. The effects of single-family rooms on parenting behavior and maternal psychological factors. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2016, 45, 359–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Maliszewska, K.M.; Bidzan, M.; Świątkowska-Freund, M.; Preis, K. Socio-demographic and psychological determinants of exclusive breastfeeding after six months postpartum—a Polish case-cohort study. Ginekol. Pol. 2018, 89, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Murray, E.K.; Ricketts, S.; Dellaport, J. Hospital practices that increase breastfeeding duration: Results from a population-based study. Birth 2007, 34, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Waits, A.; Guo, C.-Y.; Chien, L.Y. Evaluation of factors contributing to the decline in exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months postpartum: The 2011–2016 National Surveys in Taiwan. Birth 2018, 45, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bizon, A.M.B.; Giugliani, E.R.J. Women’s satisfaction with breastfeeding and risk of exclusive breastfeeding interruption. Nutrients 2023, 15, 5062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Davis, A.M.B.; Sclafani, V. Birth experiences, breastfeeding, and the mother–child relationship: Evidence from a large sample of mothers. Can. J. Nurs. Res. 2022, 54, 518–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gökbulut, N.; Beydağ, K.D. The effects of women’s satisfaction with their birth experience on breastfeeding sufficiency. SHS Web Conf. 2017, 37, 01083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Labarère, J.; Gelbert-Baudino, N.; Ayral, A.-S.; Duc, C.; Berchoud, V.; Schelstraete, C. Determinants of 6-month maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding experience in a multicenter prospective cohort study. J. Hum. Lact. 2012, 28, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bossano, C.; Townsend, K.; Walton, A.; Blomquist, J.; Handa, V. The maternal childbirth experience more than a decade after delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 217, 342.e1–342.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hinic, K. Understanding and promoting birth satisfaction in new mothers. MCN 2017, 42, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Olza, I.; Leahy-Warren, P.; Benyamini, Y.; Kazmierczak, M.; Karlsdottir, S.I.; Spyridou, A.; Crespo-Mirasol, E.; Takacs, L.; Hall, P.J.; Murphy, M.; et al. Women’s psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: A meta-synthesis. BMJ Open 2018, 18, e020347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lopes, F.; Nakamura, M.U.; Nomura, R.M.Y. Women’s satisfaction with childbirth in a public hospital in Brazil. Birth 2021, 48, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Orchard, E.R.; Rutherford, H.J.V.; Holmes, A.J.; Jamadar, S.D. Matrescence: Lifetime impact of motherhood on Cognition and the brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2023, 27, 302–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Takehara, K.; Noguchi, M.; Shimane, T.; Misago, C. The positive psychological impact of rich childbirth experiences on child-rearing. Jpn. J. Public Health. 2009, 56, 312–321. [Google Scholar]
  27. Goldbort, J.G. Women’s lived experience of their unexpected birthing process. J. Matern. Child Nurs. 2009, 34, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hollander, M.H.; Van Hastenberg, E.; Van Dillen, J.; Van Pampus, M.G.; De Miranda, E.; Stramrood, C.A.I. Preventing traumatic childbirth experiences: 2192 women’s perceptions and views. Arch. Women’s Ment. Health 2017, 20, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bell, A.F.; Andersson, E. The birth experience and women’s postnatal depression: A systematic review. Midwifery 2016, 39, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brummelte, S.; Galea, L. Postpartum depression: Etiology, treatment and consequences for maternal care. Horm. Behav. 2016, 77, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hoffman, C.; Dunn, D.M.; Njoroge, W.F. Impact of postpartum mental illness upon infant development. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2017, 19, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hinic, K. Predictors of breastfeeding confidence in the early postpartum period. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2016, 45, 649–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Menichini, D.; Zambri, F.; Govoni, L.; Ricchi, A.; Infante, R.; Palmieri, E.; Calli, M.C.; Molinazzi, M.T.; Messina, M.P.; Putignano, A.; et al. Breastfeeding promotion and support: A quality improvement study. Ann. Dell’istituto Super. Di Sanità 2021, 57, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  34. World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund (WHO/UNICEF). Protecting, Promoting and Supporting Breast-feeding: The Special Role of Maternity Services/a Joint WHO/UNICEF Statement. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/39679 (accessed on 29 July 2025).
  35. Kellams, A.; Harrel, C.; Omage, S.; Gregory, C.; Rosen-Carole, C. Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine ABM Clinical Protocol #3: Supplementary Feedings in the Healthy Term Breastfed Neonate, Revised 2017. Breastfeed. Med. 2017, 12, 188–198. [Google Scholar]
  36. Radzyminski, S.; Callister, L.C. Health professionals’ attitudes and beliefs about breastfeeding. J. Perinat. Educ. 2015, 24, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. McLellan, J.; Laidlaw, A. Perceptions of postnatal care: Factors associated with primiparous mother’s perceptions of postnatal communication and care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013, 13, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nankumbi, J.; Mukama, A.A.; Ngabirano, T.D. Predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy among women attending an urban postnatal clinic, Uganda. Nurs. Open 2019, 6, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dzakpasu, S.; Kaczorowski, J.; Chalmers, B.; Heaman, M.; Duggan, J.; Neusy, E. The Canadian maternity experiences survey: Design and methods. J. Obstet.Gynaecol. Can. 2008, 30, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Public Health Agency of Canada. The Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. 2008. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/injury-prevention/health-surveillance-epidemiology-division/maternal-infant-health/canadian-maternity-experiences-survey.html (accessed on 29 July 2025).
  41. Agampodi, S.B.; Fernando, S.; Dharmaratne, S.D.; Agampodi, T.C. Duration of exclusive breastfeeding: Validity of retrospective assessment at nine months of age. BMC Pediatr. 2011, 11, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Anstey, E.H.; Chen, J.; Elam-Evans, L.D.; Perrine, C.G. Racial and geographic differences in breastfeeding—United States, 2011–2015. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2017, 66, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Luegmair, K.; Zenzmaier, C.; Oblasser, C.; König-Bachmann, M. Women’s satisfaction with care at the birthplace in Austria: Evaluation of the Babies Born Better survey national dataset. Midwifery 2018, 59, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Baby-Friendly USA. Available online: https://www.babyfriendlyusa.org/ (accessed on 7 June 2023).
  45. Lojander, J.; Axelin, A.; Bergman, P.; Niela-Vilén, H. Maternal perceptions of breastfeeding support in a birth hospital before and after designation to the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: A quasi-experimental study. Midwifery 2022, 110, 103350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution of Responses to Satisfaction with Perinatal Care Providers Items.
Figure 1. Distribution of Responses to Satisfaction with Perinatal Care Providers Items.
Ijerph 22 01246 g001
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of Study Variables (N=118).
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of Study Variables (N=118).
VariablesM or %SDRange
Breastfeeding (6 mo)25% 0–1
Satisfaction with care scale 25.734.916–30
Satisfaction with:
Information provided by providers4.240.941–5
Compassion shown by providers4.330.851–5
Competency of providers4.250.891–5
Concern for privacy/dignity4.280.941–5
Respect shown by providers4.360.861–5
Your involvement in decision-making4.270.941–5
Sociodemographic characteristics
Age25.670.3716–38
Economic hardship1.912.230–6
Married28% 0–1
Race/ethnicity
White40% 0–1
Black28% 0–1
Hispanic14% 0–1
Native American17% 0–1
Parity1.301.500–10
Table 2. Odds of Breastfeeding at 6 Months Postpartum by Satisfaction with Perinatal Care and Sociodemographic Characteristics (N = 118).
Table 2. Odds of Breastfeeding at 6 Months Postpartum by Satisfaction with Perinatal Care and Sociodemographic Characteristics (N = 118).
VariablesOdds Ratio (95% CI) SE
Satisfaction with Perinatal Care 1.19 (1.04—1.37)*0.07
Sociodemographic characteristics
Age1.02 (0.92—1.13) 0.05
Economic hardship0.88 (0.66—1.17) 0.15
Married2.83 (0.99—8.09)*0.54
Race/ethnicity (White)
Black0.40 (0.11—1.49) 0.67
Hispanic1.26 (0.30—5.34) 0.74
Native American0.63 (0.14—2.80) 0.76
Parity1.21 (0.87—1.67) 0.17
Constant0.01**2.38
Nagelkerke R Square0.28
Notes: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Reference category in parentheses.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dressler, C.M.; Shreffler, K.M.; Wilhelm, I.R.; Price, J.R.; Gold, K.P. Maternal Satisfaction with Perinatal Care and Breastfeeding at 6 Months Postpartum. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081246

AMA Style

Dressler CM, Shreffler KM, Wilhelm IR, Price JR, Gold KP. Maternal Satisfaction with Perinatal Care and Breastfeeding at 6 Months Postpartum. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025; 22(8):1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dressler, Caitlin M., Karina M. Shreffler, Ingrid R. Wilhelm, Jameca R. Price, and Karen P. Gold. 2025. "Maternal Satisfaction with Perinatal Care and Breastfeeding at 6 Months Postpartum" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 22, no. 8: 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081246

APA Style

Dressler, C. M., Shreffler, K. M., Wilhelm, I. R., Price, J. R., & Gold, K. P. (2025). Maternal Satisfaction with Perinatal Care and Breastfeeding at 6 Months Postpartum. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(8), 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081246

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop