Next Article in Journal
Monitoring the Effectiveness of a Preschool Hand Hygiene Intervention Using Flow Cytometry to Determine the Reduction in the Microbiological Counts
Previous Article in Journal
Can an Evidence-Based Mental Health Intervention Indirectly Benefit Caregivers and Peers of Intervention Participants in Rural Sierra Leone?
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Dark Side and the Light Side of Technology-Related Stress and Stress Related to Workplace Innovations: From Artificial Intelligence to Business Transformations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 22
Issue 6
10.3390/ijerph22060845
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Dual Impact of Digital Connectivity: Balancing Productivity and Well-Being in the Modern Workplace

by
Giorgia Bondanini
1,2,*,
Cristina Giovanelli
1,2,
Nicola Mucci
3,4 and
Gabriele Giorgi
1,2
1
Business@Health Laboratory, European University of Rome, 00190 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, 00190 Rome, Italy
3
School of Occupational Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
4
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(6), 845; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060845
Submission received: 31 March 2025 / Revised: 8 May 2025 / Accepted: 20 May 2025 / Published: 28 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Dark Side and the Light Side of Technology Related Stress and Stress Related to Workplace Innovations: 2nd Edition)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

Background: Digital connectivity is essential in modern work environments, enhancing productivity and communication. However, its rapid expansion post-COVID-19 raises concerns about burnout, digital fatigue, and work-related stress. Objective: This PRISMA-based systematic review examines the benefits and challenges of digital work, assessing its impact on occupational health and proposing mitigation strategies. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Library identified 40 peer-reviewed studies published since 2020, focusing on digital connectivity, remote work, and employee well-being. Studies on purely technological aspects were excluded. Results: While digital tools improve efficiency and flexibility, they also increase workload, cognitive overload, and stress. Prolonged screen exposure contributes to mental exhaustion and sleep disturbances. Limited digital infrastructure further exacerbates productivity barriers. Conclusions: Digital connectivity offers both opportunities and risks. Organizations should implement structured policies such as offline hours, digital detox initiatives, and mental health support to sustain productivity and well-being. Future research should explore sector-specific interventions and long-term impacts of digital work practices.

1. Introduction

So far, the deepened blending of digital connectivity into the workplaces today has changed how individuals engage socially, work in collaboration, and perform work that shapes productivity. The move toward remote work—certainly hastened by the COVID-19 pandemic—has disrupted age-old constructs of work, enabling people to do their jobs from just about anywhere. This digital transformation brought several advantages: greater flexibility, improved communication, and enhanced operational efficiency [1]. Moreover, organizations have taken advantage of digital solutions to optimize workflows, automate processes, and enable worldwide collaboration. However, this transition has come with significant challenges in its own right, affecting employee well-being and mental health [2]. A commonly discussed topic of concern surrounding digital connectivity is work–life balance. Smart working definitely enables employees to do without crammed travel to and from the office, allowing them to gain more control over their schedule, but it also fuzzes the boundary between personal and professional [3]. The ability to easily access work-related communications outside of traditional working hours has resulted in an “always on” culture and increased stress levels, as well as more difficulty detaching from work-related commitments. Galanti et al.’s (2021) study suggests that overuse of digital tools, especially videoconferencing and instant messaging platforms, presents a risk of cognitive overload, digital fatigue, and social isolation [4]. It has also been apparent that the mental health ramifications of digital connectivity can manifest themselves through burnout and sleep disturbance [5]. The demand for constant accessibility, even with extended screen time, has raised stress levels among employees across a range of industries. According to a study conducted by Abdeen and Khalil in 2023, it was found that increased use of digital work platforms where more digital work is shared had significant implications that led to lower productivity, job dissatisfaction, and higher turnover intentions [6]. Some employees reported experiencing increased levels of anxiety and depression resulting from the barrage of digital communication and virtual collaboration [7]. Nevertheless, despite these factors being relevant information, remote working and with that, digital connectedness, are central in any contemporary company’s prominence. So, many organizations are starting to look for solutions to mitigate the negative effects of excessive digital screen time. Structured remote work policies, scheduled breaks, and ergonomic recommendations are just some of the strategies being put in place to ensure productivity does not come at the expense of health and well-being. Moreover, the development of artificial intelligence and automation may help to relieve workload pressures by streamlining repetitive tasks or optimizing time management [8].
A socio-economic issue that needs to be tackled with digital connectivity is the gap between those with access and those without access to information systems; this situation is called the digital divide. Workers with steady online access and high-end equipment enjoy consistent virtual teamwork; however, wealthy employees flourish while employees in poor regions trail behind. This inequality can imply further effects on the satisfaction of employees, such as meeting career and growth perspectives, and also can have an overall impact on their performance in the workplace, thus raising the demand for organizations to adjust this access in order to ensure equal places due to the existing digital infrastructure and resources [9].
However, from the broader organizational filter, the adoption of technology has driven profound alterations in ways of working, inducing firms to reconsider their management and employee participation strategies. It is up to employers to find that balance of how to encourage innovation on behalf of their workforce while managing the various potential negatives of working in remote and hybrid work environments. In an effort to mitigate the challenges brought about by excessive digital connectivity, organizations have attempted to intervene with wellness initiatives, digital detox efforts, and mental health resources [10].
From a psychological standpoint, the digital connectivity challenge facing employees is another area of concern. The trend of remote working and digital collaboration is leaving many professionals feeling lonely and disengaged. Indeed, we have swapped social face time for streamlined interfaces, with exchanges now taking place in a world that until very recently was face to face, making us efficient and hyper-connected but perhaps less emotionally parabolic. Yusuf et al. (2023) found that regular virtual events can help team cohesion but also cause video call fatigue and, in some instances, diminished engagement overall [11].
On the other hand, the medical aspect also has a lot of concerns, as prolonged exposure to digital screens and electronic devices has been linked to physical health issues, such as eye strain, musculoskeletal problems, and sleep disturbances. Moreover, the blue light from screens can impact circadian rhythms, making it hard to fall asleep and reducing sleep quality [12].
This systematic review addresses the effect of digital connectivity on occupational well-being, specifically on smart working, burnout, and related health issues. This study seeks to provide a comprehensive and integrative understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of digital environments and possible approaches to a sustainable and employee-centric digital work atmosphere through a literature review [2].

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review followed the PRISMA checklist 2020 guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO ID 1040461 [13].

2.1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

In order to achieve a systematic and reproducible search for studies, we defined the inclusion and exclusion criteria presented below. Studies that were included in the review were those that (1) came from peer-reviewed studies; (2) were published in scientific journals; (3) presented clear methodologies; these could include observational, experimental, and systematic reviews and meta-analysis study designs; (4) evaluated effects and impacts from the increased digital connectivity related to burnout, insomnia, smart working, work–life balance, and work-related stress; and (5) were published from 2020, in order to capture articles throughout the pandemic. In the selection of studies, the exclusion criteria eliminated duplicates as a result of searching on different databases; studies that focused only on explaining the technical aspects of digital connectivity, without elucidating its effects on health or well-being; studies not available in English or Italian; studies not consultable in full text; and articles of opinion where the methodology of the study was not clear. Applying these selection criteria, 40 studies were ultimately included in the final analysis.

2.2. Data Extraction

Four major academic databases, namely PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, were utilized to identify relevant studies. The search strategy had the following keywords: digital connectivity, smart working, insomnia, burnout, well-being, social impact, COVID-19 pandemic, digital work, digital transformation, and work–life balance. As summarized in Table 1, 500 studies were initially retrieved from these databases. After the removal of duplicates and irrelevant articles, 200 studies were left for additional screening. A total of 100 studies were subjected to full-text evaluation, with 40 studies finally included in this meta-analysis. Furthermore, additional relevant information can be obtained by consulting Table A1, which contains the search string.

2.3. Results Interpretation

The identified studies were systematically examined and classified according to their design and thematic emphasis. We organized the study data by date until October 2023, and by topic, such as the source of occupational burnout and stress related to remote working, the relationship between digital connectivity and disrupted sleep such as insomnia, the effect of remote working on work–life balance and generalized well-being, and videoconferencing and digital communication tools’ psychological effects on employees. The studies synthesized findings from experimental and longitudinal studies to understand trends and causality, while systematic reviews and meta-analytic findings took a broader view of the topic.

2.4. Quality Assessment

A quality assessment was carried out based on criteria defined to ensure the reliability and validity of inducted studies. The evaluation focused on study design and methodological rigor, clarity and transparency in data collection and analysis, relevance to the research objectives, and robustness of statistical analyses and reported outcomes. Studies with poor methodologies, vague data, or no definitive results were eliminated to ensure that only high-quality studies were included in the final synthesis.
No formal risk of bias tool was applied due to the heterogeneity of study designs. Instead, studies were assessed narratively for clarity of aims, sample relevance, and data transparency.

3. Results

Finally, 40 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. A flow diagram following the principles of PRISMA, showing how we selected papers for further evaluation, is presented in Figure 1.
The results of these studies highlighted the benefits of digital connectivity, such as greater work flexibility and productivity, alongside negative effects, including greater digital fatigue, burnout, and sleep-related impairments. According to studies, remote working was adopted by employees with appropriate digital tools, enhancing efficiency and work–life balance. Yet overexposure to digital screens and long, responsive virtual meetings were often correlated with cognitive overload, eye strain, and increased stress levels. Additionally, employee satisfaction was swayed by digital access and infrastructure, as employees with stable Wi-Fi connectivity were 59 per cent more productive than those with interruptions.
So, the results varied widely between industries—a reminder to consider job roles and sector-specific demands. For instance, studies targeting healthcare professionals reported high levels of stress and burnout connected to ongoing digital communication, while studies that examined corporate employees revealed that flexible digital work arrangements resulted in better well-being. Also, workplace policies, like breaks from digital devices and ergonomic guidelines, proved to be effective in minimizing the adverse effects of extensive digital connectedness.
Table 2 depicts a summary of the selected studies, their main findings, and thematic focuses. As a systematic review, it highlights both the benefits and challenges around digital connectivity we now frequently experience in contemporary ways of working, and emphasizes the promise or need for balanced digital working strategies to promote employee well-being and productivity.

4. Discussion

This review demonstrates the complex, dual, and multifaceted nature of digital connectivity in contemporary space. It has been reported that numerous digital tools have proven beneficial, as they provide increased efficiency, cost savings, improved communication, etc., but this raises concerns related to employee well-being due to increased digitalization. While working from home, and hybrid working is more flexible than in-office working, digital connectivity has some side effects such as work–life imbalance, higher workload expectations, and loneliness [15]. The growth of digital connectivity is unprecedented, rising rapidly with the dawn of the post-COVID-19 era. As the pandemic has pushed organizations towards digitalization, scientists are just starting to glimpse how the architectural implications of this phenomenon will unfold over time. The former suggests the growing significance of digital fatigue, social isolation, and blurring of work–life balance as issues of concern. With the reliance on digital tools only set to escalate, there is a cost in terms of both talent and culture, and monitoring (and evaluating) these trends should be a key priority before they become entrenched in the corporate culture [46].
Burnout, one of the key consequences of extended digital connectivity, has become a leading challenge every organization must tackle. Excessive employee engagement in video calls, instant messaging, and other online activities leads to them becoming mentally exhausted and unproductive at work. From these insights, companies should implement practices that mitigate the adverse effects of digital burnout, such as mandatory breaks, establishing meeting limits, and promoting interpersonal communication styles. Additionally, organizations could explore innovative approaches to enhance employee engagement and morale, such as virtual team-building activities that foster connection and collaboration among remote workers [2,4].
Furthermore, company policies need to evolve to recognize the fallout of digital burnout. A trend that some organizations are already embracing is structured work schedules, where employees observe “offline hours” each day (during which they are not expected to respond to emails or attend meetings in virtual rooms). Creating a culture of digital well-being, where employees feel less likely to fear losing their job for not being available, can significantly improve job satisfaction and overall mental well-being. This cultural shift can also encourage employees to prioritize their mental health, ultimately leading to a more productive and satisfied workforce [30].
Other factors not to be overlooked are digital capital and digital diversity. As we have seen above, employees with poor internet infrastructure or limited access to digital tools struggle a lot to keep up with productivity and all the technological work that is conducted around the world today. To mitigate the risk of disparities in access to digital resources, organizations and policy makers should prioritize equitable access to the digital economy. This includes investing in infrastructure improvements and providing training programs to help all employees develop the necessary digital skills to thrive in a tech-driven environment. By fostering inclusivity in digital access, organizations can harness the full potential of their workforce and drive innovation [40,41].

5. Conclusions

This systematic review of the scientific literature emphasizes the dual-sided nature of connectivity in today’s digital work environments. As a digital work solution, it presents the transformation digital tools have made for the workplace, providing collaboration and efficiency opportunities; but at the end of the day, this review is an argument for fast adopters of digital work practices to implement a methodical approach with a certain set of guidelines to mitigate the risks of burnout, digital fatigue, and work-related stress.
New technologies have changed roles and work structures in such a way that requiring adaptability and digital literacy has become a must in the new workforce. In this new professional and global environment characterized by ever deeper embedding links between work and the citizen, employees need to balance the gregariousness of time tracking and virtual communication; it is thus paramount to learn how to successfully establish the border between work and personal life. Indeed, the reach of digital connectedness goes well beyond each worker alone at their desk; it extends to the nature of organizations themselves—affecting team cohesion, leadership styles, and potentially even the global culture of business. Businesses that are unable to adjust to these shifts would face decreased employee engagement and increased turnover rates, which would, in turn, lead to decreased productivity.
From a psychological standpoint, the effects of digital connectivity have demonstrated that excessive exposure to screens can lead to cognitive overload, stress, and emotional exhaustion. Real-time communication tools have birthed an expectation for businesses that we are always on, breaking the natural flow of work patterns, resulting in broken focus and less job satisfaction. Consequently, it is pertinent for organizations to identify these risks and adopt preventative measures to mitigate them with well-defined workplace policies and interventions by developing structured digital working practices, promoting digital detox initiatives, and facilitating peer interactions. Moreover, developing a corporate culture that understands the significance of mental health support and work–life balance will be key to achieving sustainable prosperity in a digitally connected world. Indeed, investing in employee training programs on digital well-being, time management, and stress reduction can help foster these attributes in the workforce even more.
However, this review presents several limitations that should be acknowledged. One key limitation is that this study presents a high heterogeneity, particularly in terms of study design, population characteristics, and outcome measures, which limits both the comparability and generalizability of the findings. Additional potential biases may be observed, such as the limited inclusion of gray literature and non-English language sources, which may have excluded relevant but unpublished or regionally disseminated studies. An additional limitation concerns the use of formal tools, as no formal risk of bias tool was applied due to the heterogeneity of the study designs. Instead, studies were assessed narratively for clarity of aims, sample relevance, and data transparency.
Data: Further research can also explore ways to measure the effectiveness of innovations produced within the virtual economy. Such analyses will be essential to shaping effective corporate policies. Companies need to constantly rethink the strategies around digital work as they respond to the evolving needs of their employees.
Moreover, as AI-driven tools are becoming more and more embedded in digital workspaces, it is critical for organizations to reflect on how automation and algorithmic management may influence employee autonomy, skills, and psychological safety. These dimensions should not be overlooked when designing sustainable and human-centered digital transformation strategies.
Those organizations that embrace a holistic approach to well-being as part of their digital transformation programs will fare better in this brave new world. Realigning the unintended effects of digital work will not only help employees be even happier at their jobs but will also positively impact the future of organizations at a macro level.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.B. and G.G.; methodology, G.B. and C.G.; software, G.B.; validation, G.B. and C.G.; formal analysis, G.B. and G.G.; investigation, G.B.; resources, G.B.; data curation, G.B.; writing—original draft preparation, G.B.; writing—review and editing, G.B., G.G., and N.M.; visualization, G.B.; supervision, G.G. and N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Search strings run in databases.
Table A1. Search strings run in databases.
DatabaseSearch String
PubMedALL = digital connectivity OR digital connectivity AND smart working OR digital connectivity AND insomnia OR digital connectivity AND burnout OR digital connectivity and well-being
Google ScholarALL = digital connectivity OR digital connectivity AND smart working OR digital connectivity AND social impact OR digital connectivity AND infrastructure sharing OR digital connectivity AND smart working burnout in the context OR digital connectivity AND COVID-19 OR digital connectivity AND infrastructure OR digital connectivity AND social impacts OR policy framework AND digital connectivity OR digital connectivity AND well-being OR COVID-19 pandemic digital work OR COVID-19 pandemic digital transformation OR digital transformation AND digital connectivity OR digital connectivity AND social media OR digital connectivity AND emotional implications OR digital connectivity AND sleep problems
Cochrane LibraryALL = digital connectivity OR digital connectivity AND smart working OR digital connectivity AND work
ScopusALL = digital connectivity OR digital connectivity AND smart working

References

  1. Sasaki, N.; Kuroda, R.; Tsuno, K.; Kawakami, N. Workplace responses to COVID-19 associated with mental health and work performance of employees in Japan. J. Occup. Health 2020, 62, e12134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shockley, K.M.; Allen, T.D.; Dodd, H.; Waiwood, A.M. Remote worker communication during COVID-19: The role of quantity, quality, and supervisor expectation-setting. J. Appl. Psychol. 2021, 106, 1466–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sharma, A.S. Work and Life Balance Post COVID-19’. In Advances in Psychology, Mental Health, and Behavioral Studies; Bansal, R., Ed.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 172–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Galanti, T.; Guidetti, G.; Mazzei, E.; Zappalà, S.; Toscano, F. Work From Home During the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Impact on Employees’ Remote Work Productivity, Engagement, and Stress. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2021, 63, e426–e432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dresp-Langley, B.; Hutt, A. Digital Addiction and Sleep. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abdeen, T.H.I.; Khalil, M.R.M. The Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction on the Relationship between Digital Connectivity and Job Performance. Open J. Bus. Manag. 2023, 11, 3539–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Evans, S.; Perry, E. An exploration of perceptions of online asynchronous and synchronous interprofessional education facilitation strategies. J. Interprofessional Care 2023, 37, 1010–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Garcia-Perez, A.; Cegarra-Navarro, J.G.; Sallos, M.P.; Martinez-Caro, E.; Chinnaswamy, A. Resilience in healthcare systems: Cyber security and digital transformation. Technovation 2023, 121, 102583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ren, R.; Qu, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhao, W.X.; She, Q.; Wu, H.; Wang, H.; Wen, J.-R. RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-ranking. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2110.07367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nguyen, M.H. Managing Social Media Use in an “Always-On” Society: Exploring Digital Wellbeing Strategies That People Use to Disconnect. Mass Commun. Soc. 2021, 24, 795–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yusuf, S.D.; Omojorla, V.; Umar, I.; Loko, A.Z. Implementation of a 220v Ac Overload and High Voltage Monitor Alert System with Auto Shut Down. Int. J. Eng. Mod. Technol. 2023, 8, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brown, M.R.; Coombes, P.J.; Rodriguez, D.K.J.; Hickman, A.P.I.; Keating, D.S. Effectiveness of Exercise Via Telehealth for Chronic Disease: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Exercise Interventions Delivered Via Videoconferencing. J. Clin. Exerc. Physiol. 2024, 13, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nadler, R. Understanding “Zoom fatigue”: Theorizing spatial dynamics as third skins in computer-mediated communication. Comput. Compos. 2020, 58, 102613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Majumdar, P.; Biswas, A.; Sahu, S. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown: Cause of sleep disruption, depression, somatic pain, and increased screen exposure of office workers and students of India. Chronobiol. Int. 2020, 37, 1191–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bailenson, J.N. Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technol. Mind Behav. 2021, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fauville, G.; Luo, M.; Queiroz, A.C.M.; Bailenson, J.N.; Hancock, J. Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 2021, 4, 100119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bennett, A.A.; Campion, E.D.; Keeler, K.R.; Keener, S.K. Videoconference fatigue? Exploring changes in fatigue after videoconference meetings during COVID-19. J. Appl. Psychol. 2021, 106, 330–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Okabe-Miyamoto, K.; Durnell, E.; Howell, R.T.; Zizi, M. Did zoom bomb? Negative video conferencing meetings during COVID -19 undermined worker subjective productivity. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 3, 1067–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, C.; Yu, M.C.; Marin, S. Exploring public sentiment on enforced remote work during COVID-19. J. Appl. Psychol. 2021, 106, 797–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ivanov, D. Supply Chain Viability and the COVID-19 pandemic: A conceptual and formal generalisation of four major adaptation strategies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 59, 3535–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roberts, J.K.; Pavlakis, A.E.; Richards, M.P. It’s More Complicated Than It Seems: Virtual Qualitative Research in the COVID-19 Era. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2021, 20, 16094069211002959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bleakley, A.; Rough, D.; Edwards, J.; Doyle, P.; Dumbleton, O.; Clark, L.; Rintel, S.; Wade, V.; Cowan, B.R. Bridging social distance during social distancing: Exploring social talk and remote collegiality in video conferencing. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2021, 37, 404–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Battisti, E.; Alfiero, S.; Leonidou, E. Remote working and digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Economic–financial impacts and psychological drivers for employees. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 150, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Johnson, K.G.; Sullivan, S.S.; Nti, A.; Rastegar, V.; Gurubhagavatula, I. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sleep medicine practices. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2021, 17, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chanana, N.; Sangeeta. Employee engagement practices during COVID-19 lockdown. J. Public Aff. 2021, 21, e2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Döring, N.; Moor, K.D.; Fiedler, M.; Schoenenberg, K.; Raake, A. Videoconference Fatigue: A Conceptual Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gutiérrez, L.A.; Kim, T.; Partola, S.; Kuttner, P.J.; Niang, A.; Yanagui, A.; Hernández, L.; López, G.R.; Mayer-Glenn, J. Community-Centered School Leadership: Radical Care and Aperturas During COVID-19. AERA Open 2022, 8, 23328584221096465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Raake, A.; Fiedler, M.; Schoenenberg, K. De Moor, and N. Döring. Technological Factors Influencing Videoconferencing and Zoom Fatigue. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2202.01740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Van Zoonen, W.; Sivunen, A.E. The impact of remote work and mediated communication frequency on isolation and psychological distress. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 2021, 31, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Parker, J.S.; Haskins, N.; Clemons, A.; McClure, E.; Washington, J. Early career Black women in school-based mental health fields: Understanding their experiences of workplace discrimination. J. Sch. Psychol. 2022, 92, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tsai, C.-H.; Chen, P.-C.; Liu, D.-S.; Kuo, Y.-Y.; Hsieh, T.-T.; Chiang, D.-L.; Lai, F.; Wu, C.-T. Panic Attack Prediction Using Wearable Devices and Machine Learning: Development and Cohort Study. JMIR Med. Inform. 2022, 10, e33063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Costin, A.; Roman, A.F.; Balica, R.-S. Remote work burnout, professional job stress, and employee emotional exhaustion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1193854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Thompson, S.M.; Keenan-Miller, D.; Dunn, D.; Hersh, J.; Saules, K.K.; Graham, S.R.; Bell, D.J.; Hames, J.L.; Wray, A.; Hiraoka, R.; et al. Preferences for and acceptability of telesupervision among health service psychology trainees. Train. Educ. Prof. Psychol. 2023, 17, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bailey, D.R.; Almusharraf, N.; Almusharraf, A. Video conferencing in the e-learning context: Explaining learning outcome with the technology acceptance model. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2022, 27, 7679–7698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martínez-Líbano, J.; Yeomans, M.-M. Emotional Exhaustion Variables in Trainee Teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2023, 13, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Choung, Y.; Chatterjee, S.; Pak, T.-Y. Digital financial literacy and financial well-being. Financ. Res. Lett. 2023, 58, 104438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Palos-Sanchez, P.R.; Baena-Luna, P.; Silva-O’Connor, D. Exploring employees’ beliefs regarding the potential benefits of virtual worlds for group cohesion: Gather town. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2022, 82, 24943–24965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, X.; Al Mamun, A.; Hoque, M.E.; Hussain, W.M.H.W.; Yang, Q. Work design, employee well-being, and retention intention: A case study of China’s young workforce. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Deng, H.; Duan, S.X.; Wibowo, S. Digital technology driven knowledge sharing for job performance. J. Knowl. Manag. 2022, 27, 404–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Charoenporn, V.; Charernboon, T. Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Zoom Exhaustion and Fatigue Scale (ZEF-T). Fatigue Biomed. Health Behav. 2023, 11, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Luebstorf, S.; Allen, J.A.; Eden, E.; Kramer, W.S.; Reiter-Palmon, R.; Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. Digging into “Zoom Fatigue”: A Qualitative Exploration of Remote Work Challenges and Virtual Meeting Stressors. Merits 2023, 3, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stukovnik, V.; Vuk, V.; Horvat, M.; Pizzulin, V.V. Videoconferencing and Sleep Quality in Slovenian University Students: Is There a Mediating Role of Zoom Fatigue? CEPS J. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xiao, T.; Pan, M.; Xiao, X.; Liu, Y. The relationship between physical activity and sleep disorders in adolescents: A chain-mediated model of anxiety and mobile phone dependence. BMC Psychol. 2024, 12, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Delgado, L.C.; Guerra, P.; Perakakis, P.; Vera, M.N.; del Paso, G.R.; Vila, J. Treating chronic worry: Psychological and physiological effects of a training programme based on mindfulness. Behav. Res. Ther. 2010, 48, 873–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Litchfield, I.; Shukla, D.; Greenfield, S. Impact of COVID-19 on the digital divide: A rapid review. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e053440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 22 00845 g001
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Ijerph 22 00845 g001
Table 1. Study selection.
Table 1. Study selection.
PhaseNumber of StudiesReason for Selection or Exclusion
Studies initially identified~500Retrieved from Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library.
Studies after duplicate removal and screening~200Exclusion of duplicates and non-relevant articles.
Full-text studies assessed for eligibility~100Retained based on methodological rigor and relevance.
Final studies included~40High-quality studies used for PRISMA-based review.
Table 2. Summary of the selected studies.
Table 2. Summary of the selected studies.
Author(s)YearStudy ObjectiveMethodologyMain Findings
Nadler, R. [14]2020Examine the impact of videoconferencing on communication and cognitive fatigue.Literature review.Videoconferencing can increase cognitive fatigue due to the lack of non-verbal cues and the extra effort needed to process information.
Sasaki, N. et al. [1]2020Investigate the impact of remote work on employees’ mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.Cross-sectional study with online questionnaires.Remote work is associated with lower psychological stress levels compared to in-office work during the pandemic.
Majumdar, P. et al. [15]2020Examine screen exposure and mental fatigue in remote workers.Experimental study measuring cognitive fatigue.Extended screen time significantly increases mental fatigue.
Bailenson, J.N. [16]2021Analyze the causes of "Zoom fatigue" and propose solutions to mitigate it.Theoretical analysis based on previous studies.Excessive close-up eye contact, constant self-view, and restricted mobility contribute to videoconference fatigue.
Fauville, G. et al. [17]2021Develop and validate the "Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale" (ZEF) to measure videoconference-related fatigue.Empirical study with participants using videoconferencing tools.The ZEF scale is a valid tool for measuring fatigue associated with video conferencing use.
Bennett, A.A. et al. [18]2021Explore changes in fatigue after videoconference meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic.Longitudinal study with pre- and post-meeting surveys.Videoconference meetings are linked to increased fatigue, especially when prolonged without breaks.
Okabe-Miyamoto, K. et al. [19]2021Examine the effect of constant connectivity on employee productivity during the pandemic.Quantitative study with online surveys.Costant connecivity is associated with a decrease in perceived productivity.
Zhang, Y. et al. [20]2021Investigate the impact of videoconferencing on workers’ mental health.Cross-sectional study with psychological questionnaires.Frequent videoconferencing is correlated with symptoms of anxiety and depression.
Nguyen, T. et al. [10]2021Assess the effect of videoconferencing on stress management in remote teams.Qualitative study with manager interviews.Videoconferencing can be stressful for remote teams, requiring specific management strategies.
Ivanov, D. et al. [21]2021Investigate the impact of videoconfere on information security in organizations.Case study with security incident analysis.Videoconferencing can increase information security risks if not managed properly.
Shockley, K.M. et al. [2]2021Investigate the effect of remote work on employee well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.Cross-sectional study with online surveys.Remote work has mixed effects on well-being, improving work-life balance for some but increasing burnout for others.
Galanti, T. et al. [4]2021Analyze the effect of remote work on employee well-being and work-life balance during the COVID-19 pandemic.Quantitative study with employee surveys.Remote work improved work-life balance but also increased feelings of isolation and burnout.
Roberts, J.K. et al. [22]2021Investigate the effect of constant connectivity on cognitive load.Experimental study with cognitive task performance.Constant connectivity increases cognitive load compared to face-to-face communication.
Dresp-Langley, B. et al. [5]2022Analyze the impact of prolonged digital device use on sleep during the pandemic.Observational study with sleep monitoring.Increased digital device use, especially before bedtime, is associated with reduced sleep quality and higher insomnia rates.
Bleakley, A. et al. [23]2022Investigate how videoconferencing affects team collaboration.Experimental study with team tasks.Videoconferencing reduces collaboration efficiency due to delayed communication.
Battisti, E. et al. [24]2021Examine the effect of digital connectivity on employees’ time management.Quantitative study with work-time analysis.Digital connectivity can lead to inefficient time management and work overload.
Johnson, K.J. et al. [25]2021Examine digital platform use and sleep disorders during COVID-19.Prospective cohort study.Prolonged digital platform use was associated with insomnia.
Chanana, N. et al. [26]2021Examining the role of hyper-connectivity to digital devices in employee engagement.Survey-based study with remote workers.Hyper-connectivity can reduce engagement due to cognitive overload.
Döring, N. et al. [27]2022Examine the association between hyper-connectivity use and eye fatigue.Experimental study with ocular measurements.Prolonged hyper-connectivity is linked to symptoms of eye strain, highlighting the need for regular breaks.
Alvarez-Gutierrez, L. et al. [28]2022Examine the effect of digital connectivity on leadership effectiveness.Interviews with remote team leaders.Leaders find it harder to build rapport and trust through videoconferencing.
Raake, A. et al. [29]2022Explore coping strategies for videoconferencing fatigue.Meta-analysis of existing studies.Strategies like reducing screen time and incorporating breaks help mitigate fatigue.
Van Zoonen, W. et al. [30]2022Analyze the psychological effects of prolonged virtual communication.Longitudinal study with mental health assessments.Prolonged virtual communication is linked to higher stress and anxiety levels.
Park, E. S. et al. [31]2023Investigate the impact of remote work policies on employee satisfaction.Large-scale employee survey.Flexible remote work policies increase satisfaction, but excessive videoconferencing negates benefits.
Tsai, H. H.. et al. [32]2023Analyze the relationship between digital connectivity and social isolation.Longitudinal study.Digital connectivity can increase feelings of social isolation.
Costin, A. et al. [33]2023Assess the impact of digital connectivity on productivity and employee well-being.Longitudinal study.Effective digital connectivity was crucial for productivity but led to burnout and digital fatigue.
Thompson, S.M. et al. [34]2022Analyze the impact of hyper-connectivity on job satisfaction.Longitudinal study.Excessive hyper-connectivity can reduce job satisfaction over time.
Evans, H. et al. [7]2023Assess the impact of virtual backgrounds on videoconferencing fatigue.Experimental study.Virtual backgrounds can reduce visual fatigue but may increase cognitive strain.
Bailey, D. R. et al. [35]2023Analyze videoconferencing’s effect on learning engagement.Longitudinal study.Videoconferencing can decrease student engagement compared to in-person learning.
Martinez et al. [36]2023Analyze the impact of remote work on mental health among teachers.Cross-sectional study.Remote teachers reported higher burnout than in-person teachers.
Choung, Y. et al. [37]2023Investigate digital connectivity’s effect on well-being in the financial sector.Mixed-method study.Stable digital connectivity improved productivity but increased stress.
Garcia-Perez, A. et al. [8]2023Explore digital connectivity’s impact on healthcare workers’ well-being.Qualitative study.Digital connectivity made separating work from life harder, increasing stress.
Palos-Sanchez, P. R. et al. [38]2023Investigate videoconferencing’s effect on team cohesion.Mixed-method study.Videoconferencing can reduce team trust and cohesion.
Chen, W. H. et al. [39]2023Assess the impact of virtual team meetings on innovation.Case study with R&D teams.Virtual meetings limit spontaneous idea exchange, reducing innovation.
Deng, H. et al. [40]2023Assess digital communication’s impact on job performance.Mixed-method study with employee feedback.Digital communication tools improve efficiency but increase stress.
Charoenporn, V. et al. [41]2023Evaluate how AI-driven tools can reduce videoconferencing fatigue.Experimental study using AI-assisted communication.AI tools that summarize meetings reduce cognitive strain and improve efficiency.
Luebstorf, S. et al. [42]2023Examine strategies to reduce digital fatigue in remote workers.Experimental study.Regular breaks and adjusting screen time significantly reduce digital fatigue.
Štukovnik, V. et al. [43]2024Assess the effect of hyper-connectivity on employees’ sleep quality.Observational study.Hyper-connectivity is associated with reduced sleep quality.
Xiao, T. et al. [44]2024Examine digital device use and sleep disorders.Observational study.Prolonged device use is correlated with sleep disturbances.
Delgado, K. et al. [45]2024Analyze videoconferencing’s impact on professional training.Qualitative study.Videoconferencing is less effective than in-person training.
Brown, T. et al. [12]2024Analyze the impact of hyper-connectivity on posture and musculoskeletal pain.Ergonomic study with postural assessments.Hyper-connectivity is linked to poor posture and increased musculoskeletal pain.
A meta-analysis was not conducted due to the heterogeneity among the included studies in terms of design, outcome measures, and populations investigated. Therefore, a narrative synthesis was deemed more appropriate to preserve the interpretative validity of the findings.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bondanini, G.; Giovanelli, C.; Mucci, N.; Giorgi, G. The Dual Impact of Digital Connectivity: Balancing Productivity and Well-Being in the Modern Workplace. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060845

AMA Style

Bondanini G, Giovanelli C, Mucci N, Giorgi G. The Dual Impact of Digital Connectivity: Balancing Productivity and Well-Being in the Modern Workplace. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025; 22(6):845. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060845

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bondanini, Giorgia, Cristina Giovanelli, Nicola Mucci, and Gabriele Giorgi. 2025. "The Dual Impact of Digital Connectivity: Balancing Productivity and Well-Being in the Modern Workplace" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 22, no. 6: 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060845

APA Style

Bondanini, G., Giovanelli, C., Mucci, N., & Giorgi, G. (2025). The Dual Impact of Digital Connectivity: Balancing Productivity and Well-Being in the Modern Workplace. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(6), 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060845

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop