Next Article in Journal
Emotionality Stigma, Sociocultural Factors, and Health Inequities in Urban Adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
Community Asset Mapping: Promoting Inclusion and Equity and Countering Stigma in Applied Substance Use Research
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Diet for Human and Planetary Health: Why We Should Consider Limiting Meat?

1
Divsion of Liver Disease & Transplant Hepatology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Regional Medical Center, Riverdale, GA 30274, USA
3
West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
4
Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(10), 1499; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22101499
Submission received: 30 May 2025 / Revised: 1 September 2025 / Accepted: 17 September 2025 / Published: 29 September 2025

Abstract

Climate change is currently the most significant threat to public health, and human activities are the major contributing factor. There is an urgent need to prioritize mitigation strategies at both personal and public policy levels. There is a general lack of belief that changes at a personal level would have a significant effect. However, it is vital to recognize the importance of food consumption on one’s personal footprint and how it can be used as a key feature in mitigation efforts. The Center for Sustainable Systems at the University of Michigan projects that reducing meat consumption per individual by 50% reduces an individual’s carbon footprint by 35% per day and reducing by 90% cuts an individual’s carbon footprint by 51% per day. Additionally, high meat consumption has been associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and colorectal cancer. In contrast, plant-based diets are linked to better health outcomes and lower mortality rates. This article is a narrative review and reviews current evidence on the health and environmental impacts of meat-based diets and highlights the potential benefits of plant-forward dietary patterns. These findings support the integration of dietary recommendations into climate and public health strategies. Promoting plant-based diets through clinical guidance and policy initiatives may offer a cost-effective, scalable approach to advancing both population health and environmental sustainability.
Keywords: meat-based diet; plant-based diets; human health; sustainability; biodiversity meat-based diet; plant-based diets; human health; sustainability; biodiversity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moparty, H.; Pala, M.; Ampolu, S.; Gayam, S. Diet for Human and Planetary Health: Why We Should Consider Limiting Meat? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22101499

AMA Style

Moparty H, Pala M, Ampolu S, Gayam S. Diet for Human and Planetary Health: Why We Should Consider Limiting Meat? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025; 22(10):1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22101499

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moparty, Hamsika, Manya Pala, Sahaja Ampolu, and Swapna Gayam. 2025. "Diet for Human and Planetary Health: Why We Should Consider Limiting Meat?" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 22, no. 10: 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22101499

APA Style

Moparty, H., Pala, M., Ampolu, S., & Gayam, S. (2025). Diet for Human and Planetary Health: Why We Should Consider Limiting Meat? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(10), 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22101499

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop