Next Article in Journal
Why Do New Parents Stop Practising Sport? A Retrospective Study towards the Determinants of Dropping Out after Becoming a Parent
Previous Article in Journal
The Utility of Data Collected as Part of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficacy of Low-Cost Sensor Networks at Detecting Fine-Scale Variations in Particulate Matter in Urban Environments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Optimizing the Indoor Air Quality in Historical Buildings: Strategies for Environmental Improvement and Public Health Enhancement

1
Italian Society of Environmental Medicine (SIMA), Viale di Porta Vercellina, 9, 20123 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Salento, Via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
3
International WELL Building Institute, New York, NY 10001, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(3), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030341
Submission received: 23 February 2024 / Accepted: 27 February 2024 / Published: 14 March 2024
The endeavor to maintain and enhance the indoor air quality (IAQ) in historical buildings transcends the traditional boundaries of cultural heritage preservation, emerging as a pivotal public health concern. These structures, which stand as testaments to the rich and diverse tapestry of human history, are often beleaguered by air quality challenges, which can pose substantial health risks to both visitors and staff. The intricate nature of these structures, coupled with their age and the materials used in their construction, often results in a unique set of IAQ issues. These range from the accumulation of dust and particulate matter to the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants, which can emanate from the building materials themselves, artifacts housed, and visitors [1].
Furthermore, the presence of other pollutants such as mold, dust, and chemical vapors as a result of conservation practices can create an environment detrimental to human health. The research [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] has shown that prolonged exposure to poor IAQ can lead to a range of health problems, including respiratory issues, allergies, and even more severe chronic conditions. This is particularly concerning in historical buildings, which are not only workplaces but also popular tourist destinations, drawing large numbers of visitors who may be unaware of their potential air quality hazards. The challenge is to address IAQ issues at historical sites without compromising their integrity.
Protecting the health of individuals working in historical buildings is an essential aspect of enhancing their IAQ. These individuals, including curators, conservationists, conservation scientists, scholars, administrative staff, and maintenance crews, spend significant amounts of time within these environments, making them particularly susceptible to the long-term effects of poor air quality. Prolonged exposure to pollutants such as dust, mold spores, chemical vapors from conservation materials, and even potentially harmful emissions from aging building materials can lead to chronic respiratory issues, allergies, and other health concerns [5,6,12].
From an environmental chemistry perspective, the first step in safeguarding the health of workers in historical buildings involves a comprehensive assessment of the air quality. This includes identifying and quantifying the various pollutants present, such as VOCs, particulate matter, and biological contaminants like mold, using advanced monitoring techniques. Equally, advanced analytical techniques, like gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), can be employed to accurately detect and measure pollutant levels. Once they are identified, the source of these pollutants must be addressed.
For instance, if certain building materials or preservation chemicals are significant sources of VOCs, alternatives with lower emission rates must be sought out. In terms of environmental medicine, the focus shifts to understanding the health implications of these pollutants and implementing strategies to mitigate their impact. Regular health screenings and monitoring for staff working in these environments can help with the early detection of potential health issues. Additionally, educating staff about the symptoms of exposure to various pollutants and the importance of protective measures is crucial. This could include training on the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE), such as masks and gloves, especially during conservation processes, which might involve the release of harmful substances.
Innovative technologies also play a pivotal role in sanitizing indoor environments in historical buildings. One such technology is the use of advanced HVAC systems with HEPA filters and UV-C light sanitization [13,14,15,16]. HEPA filters are highly effective in trapping particulate matter, including mold spores and dust, while UV-C light has been proven to inactivate a wide range of microorganisms, thus reducing the biological load in the air. Furthermore, the integration of smart sensors and IoT (Internet of Things) [17,18] technology with new AI (Artificial Intelligence) and Neural Network algorithms [19] can enable real-time monitoring of the IAQ, allowing for prompt responses to any deterioration in air quality.
Another innovative approach is the use of photocatalytic and electrocatalytic oxidation (PCO and ECO) technologies [20,21,22]. With these technologies, a photocatalyst, typically titanium dioxide, is utilized to oxidize organic pollutants in the air, converting them into harmless substances like water and carbon dioxide. PCO systems can be particularly effective in reducing the concentration of VOCs and other organic compounds in the air.
Additionally, the implementation of green cleaning practices in historical buildings can significantly reduce the introduction of new pollutants. This involves using cleaning products that are environmentally friendly and free from harsh chemicals, which may contribute to poor IAQ. Moreover, adopting practices like controlled ventilation during cleaning and conservation processes can help by minimizing the concentration of pollutants in the air.
In addition to technical and health-focused strategies, it is imperative for policymakers, governments, and international organizations such as UNESCO, ICOM, ICCROM, and the European Union to shape and enforce policies that prioritize indoor air quality in historical buildings [23,24]. These entities should collaborate to establish comprehensive guidelines and standards for IAQ management at cultural heritage sites. This includes setting permissible levels for various pollutants, mandating regular air quality assessments, and enforcing the use of environmentally friendly materials and practices in conservation efforts.
Funding and resources are crucial to this endeavor. Governments and international bodies should allocate specific funds dedicated to improving the IAQ in historical buildings. This financial support could be used for upgrading HVAC systems, implementing advanced air purification technologies, and conducting essential research on environmental chemistry and medicine pertaining to IAQ. Furthermore, incentivizing research and development in this field can lead to the innovation of more effective and sustainable solutions.
The relevant policy frameworks should also include educational and training programs for staff working in these buildings, ensuring they are well informed about IAQ issues and mitigation measures. Additionally, these policies should encourage public awareness campaigns to educate visitors about the importance of IAQ to preserving both cultural heritage and public health.
Moreover, international cooperation is key in this realm. Sharing knowledge, research findings, and best practices between countries and institutions through international conferences, workshops, and collaborative research projects can lead to more effective and globally applicable solutions.
Finally, it is essential for these policies to be dynamic and adaptable. As new research emerges and technologies evolve, policies should be revisited and revised accordingly to ensure they remain effective and relevant. By taking a proactive and collaborative approach, policymakers, governments, and international organizations can significantly contribute to safeguarding the indoor air quality of historical buildings, thereby protecting both cultural heritage and the health of those who work in and visit these treasured sites.
In conclusion, optimizing the indoor air quality in historical buildings requires a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach. By combining insights from environmental chemistry and environmental medicine with the latest developments in air purification and monitoring technologies, it is possible to create a safer and healthier environment for those who work in these culturally significant spaces. This not only protects the health of staff and visitors but also contributes to the preservation of these historical treasures for future generations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Greco, E.; Ciliberto, E.; Verdura, P.D.; Lo Giudice, E.; Navarra, G. Nanoparticle-Based Concretes for the Restoration of Historical and Contemporary Buildings: A New Way for CO2 Reduction in Architecture. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2016, 122, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gligorovski, S.; Weschler, C.J. The Oxidative Capacity of Indoor Atmospheres. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 13905–13906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bernstein, J.A.; Alexis, N.; Bacchus, H.; Bernstein, I.L.; Fritz, P.; Horner, E.; Li, N.; Mason, S.; Nel, A.; Oullette, J.; et al. The Health Effects of Nonindustrial Indoor Air Pollution. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 121, 585–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Weschler, C.J.; Nazaroff, W.W. SVOC Exposure Indoors: Fresh Look at Dermal Pathways. Indoor Air 2012, 22, 356–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hulin, M.; Simoni, M.; Viegi, G.; Annesi-Maesano, I. Respiratory Health and Indoor Air Pollutants Based on Quantitative Exposure Assessments. Eur. Respir. J. 2012, 40, 1033–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hamanaka, R.B.; Mutlu, G.M. Particulate Matter Air Pollution: Effects on the Cardiovascular System. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Brook, R.D.; Rajagopalan, S.; Pope, C.A.; Brook, J.R.; Bhatnagar, A.; Diez-Roux, A.V.; Holguin, F.; Hong, Y.; Luepker, R.V.; Mittleman, M.A.; et al. Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update to the Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010, 121, 2331–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Morawska, L.; Afshari, A.; Bae, G.N.; Buonanno, G.; Chao, C.Y.H.; Hänninen, O.; Hofmann, W.; Isaxon, C.; Jayaratne, E.R.; Pasanen, P.; et al. Indoor Aerosols: From Personal Exposure to Risk Assessment. Indoor Air 2013, 23, 462–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Weschler, C.J.; Nazaroff, W.W. Dermal Uptake of Organic Vapors Commonly Found in Indoor Air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 1230–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Raub, J.A.; Mathieu-Nolf, M.; Hampson, N.B.; Thom, S.R. Carbon Monoxide Poisoning—A Public Health Perspective. Toxicology 2000, 145, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Miller, M.R.; Shaw, C.A.; Langrish, J.P. From Particles to Patients: Oxidative Stress and the Cardiovascular Effects of Air Pollution. Future Cardiol. 2012, 8, 577–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lucattini, L.; Poma, G.; Covaci, A.; de Boer, J.; Lamoree, M.H.; Leonards, P.E.G. A Review of Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) in the Indoor Environment: Occurrence in Consumer Products, Indoor Air and Dust. Chemosphere 2018, 201, 466–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cattai, F.; D’Orazio, A.; Sbardella, G. A Systematic Review on the Application of Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation to HVAC Systems. Energies 2023, 16, 7569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pigeot-Remy, S.; Lazzaroni, J.C.; Simonet, F.; Petinga, P.; Vallet, C.; Petit, P.; Vialle, P.J.; Guillard, C. Survival of Bioaerosols in HVAC System Photocatalytic Filters. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 144, 654–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mathur, G. Energy Consumption of Titanium Dioxide & Ultraviolet Germicidal (UV-C) Photocatalytic Air Purification System for Automotive Cabins; SAE Technical Papers; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  16. D’Orazio, A.; D’Alessandro, D. Air Bio-Contamination Control in Hospital Environment by UV-C Rays and HEPA Filters in HVAC Systems. Ann. Di Ig. Med. Prev. E Di Comunita 2020, 32, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vermesan, O.; Friess, O. Internet of Things: Converging Technologies for Smart Environments; River Publishers: Aalborg, Denmark, 2013; ISBN 9788792982735. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mumtaz, R.; Zaidi, S.M.H.; Shakir, M.Z.; Shafi, U.; Malik, M.M.; Haque, A.; Mumtaz, S.; Zaidi, S.A.R. Internet of Things (Iot) Based Indoor Air Quality Sensing and Predictive Analytic—A COVID-19 Perspective. Electronics 2021, 10, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marcianò, A.; Chen, D.; Fabrocini, F.; Fields, C.; Greco, E.; Gresnigt, N.; Jinklub, K.; Lulli, M.; Terzidis, K.; Zappala, E. Quantum Neural Networks and Topological Quantum Field Theories. Neural Networks 2022, 153, 164–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Greco, E.; Ciliberto, E.; Cirino, A.M.E.; Capitani, D.; Di Tullio, V. A New Preparation of Doped Photocatalytic TiO2 Anatase Nanoparticles: A Preliminary Study for the Removal of Pollutants in Confined Museum Areas. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2016, 122, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Greco, E.; Shang, J.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, T. Synthesis of Polyacetylene-like Modified Graphene Oxide Aerogel and Its Enhanced Electrical Properties. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 20948–20954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Greco, E.; Balsamo, S.A.; Maccarrone, G.; Mello, D.; Ciliberto, E.; Shang, J.; Zhu, T. Gold-Core Lithium-Doped Titania Shell Nanostructures for Plasmon-Enhanced Visible Light Harvesting with Photocatalytic Activity. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2020, 22, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ahmed Abdul-Wahab, S.A.; En, S.C.F.; Elkamel, A.; Ahmadi, L.; Yetilmezsoy, K. A Review of Standards and Guidelines Set by International Bodies for the Parameters of Indoor Air Quality. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2015, 6, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tham, K.W. Indoor Air Quality and Its Effects on Humans—A Review of Challenges and Developments in the Last 30 Years. Energy Build. 2016, 130, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Piscitelli, P.; Miani, A.; Mecca, S.; Hodgton, R. Optimizing the Indoor Air Quality in Historical Buildings: Strategies for Environmental Improvement and Public Health Enhancement. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030341

AMA Style

Piscitelli P, Miani A, Mecca S, Hodgton R. Optimizing the Indoor Air Quality in Historical Buildings: Strategies for Environmental Improvement and Public Health Enhancement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(3):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Piscitelli, Prisco, Alessandro Miani, Saverio Mecca, and Rachel Hodgton. 2024. "Optimizing the Indoor Air Quality in Historical Buildings: Strategies for Environmental Improvement and Public Health Enhancement" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 3: 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030341

APA Style

Piscitelli, P., Miani, A., Mecca, S., & Hodgton, R. (2024). Optimizing the Indoor Air Quality in Historical Buildings: Strategies for Environmental Improvement and Public Health Enhancement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(3), 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop