Next Article in Journal
The Sizes of Spine Curvatures of Children That Practice Selected Sports
Next Article in Special Issue
Dietary Intake of Salt from Meat Products in Serbian Population
Previous Article in Journal
Psychosocial Risk in COVID Context: The Impact of Economic Factors and Labour Protection Policy (ERTEs) in Spain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Food Safety Behaviours among Food Handlers in Different Food Service Establishments in Montenegro
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Correlation Analysis of Microbial Contamination and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Raw Milk and Dairy Products

Research Unit of Food Safety, Chinese Academy of Medical Science (2019RU014), NHC Key Laborarory of Food Safety Risk Assessment, China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing 100022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 1825; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031825
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 10 January 2023 / Accepted: 15 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023

Abstract

:
Microbial contamination in raw milk and dairy products can detrimentally affect product quality and human health. In this study, the aerobic plate count, aerobic Bacillus abundance, thermophilic aerobic Bacillus abundance, and alkaline phosphatase activity were determined in 435 raw milk, 451 pasteurized milk, and 617 sterilized milk samples collected from 13 Chinese provinces (or municipalities). Approximately 9.89% and 2.22% of raw milk and pasteurized milk samples exceeded the threshold values for the aerobic plate count, respectively. The proportions of aerobic Bacillus in raw milk, pasteurized milk, and sterilized milk were 54.02%, 14.41%, and 1.30%, respectively. The proportions of thermophilic aerobic Bacillus species were 7.36% in raw milk and 4.88% in pasteurized milk samples, and no bacteria were counted in sterilized milk. Approximately 36.18% of raw milk samples contained >500,000 mU/L of alkaline phosphatase activity, while 9.71% of pasteurized milk samples contained >350 mU/L. For raw milk, there was a positive correlation between the aerobic plate count, the aerobic Bacillus abundance, and the alkaline phosphatase activity, and there was a positive correlation between the aerobic Bacillus abundance, the thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count, and the alkaline phosphatase activity. For pasteurized milk, there was a positive correlation between the aerobic plate count, the aerobic Bacillus abundance, and the thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count; however, the alkaline phosphatase activity had a negative correlation with the aerobic plate count, the aerobic Bacillus abundance, and the thermophilic aerobic Bacillus abundance. These results facilitate the awareness of public health safety issues and the involvement of dairy product regulatory agencies in China.

1. Introduction

Microbial contamination of raw milk and dairy products is an important source of foodborne pathogens that can adversely affect human health [1,2]. The microbial contamination of raw milk can affect the safety and the quality of dairy products from the source [3]. During the processing of dairy products, microorganisms from several sources (e.g., personnel, water, equipment, additives, and packaging materials) can cause contamination [4]. Milk microbial contamination is also responsible for significant economic losses at various points throughout the milk production chain [5]. Compared with other commodities, dairy products are easily contaminated and subject to rapid deterioration [4].
The most common bacterial spores in dairy products belong to the genus Bacillus. Mesophilic and thermophilic aerobic Bacillus species are of particular concern because of their high heat resistance and the high thermal stability of their degradation enzymes [6]. Some species of the genus Bacillus have been implicated in food-borne diseases. For example, B. cereus was reported as the causative agent in a large food poisoning outbreak attributed to pasteurized milk [7]. At mesophilic temperatures, some facultative thermophiles, such as B. subtilis, B. licheniformis, and B. pumilus, can also produce toxins [8]. Spoilage caused by Bacillus species has been reported, even in commercially sterilized milk [7].
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP; EC 3.1.3.1), an enzyme that is naturally found in raw milk, can be denatured by pasteurization temperatures. Alkaline phosphatase activity has been used to confirm the efficacy of pasteurization in dairy products. Thus, a dairy product that contains an insignificant amount of active enzyme or no enzyme at all is considered properly pasteurized [9].
The aims of this study were: (i) to investigate microbial contamination and alkaline phosphatase activity in raw milk, pasteurized milk, and sterilized milk collected from 13 Chinese provinces, and (ii) to clarify the correlation between the aerobic plate count, aerobic Bacillus abundance, thermophilic aerobic Bacillus abundance, and alkaline phosphatase activity. The findings of this study provide theoretical and practical support for elucidating the microbiological quality of raw, pasteurized, and sterilized milk in China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

A total of 435 raw milk, 451 pasteurized milk, and 617 sterilized milk samples were collected randomly from 13 Chinese provinces (or municipalities). One province collected 105–189 samples (Supplementary Table S1), consisting of raw milk, pasteurized milk, and sterilized milk samples. The volume of each sample was 500 mL. The sampling sites included dairy farms, dairy factories, supermarkets, retail shops, online stores, farmer’s markets, and restaurants. The sample collection and the investigation were conducted from April to September 2021.

2.2. Microbiological Analyses and Enzymatic Activity Assays

The determination of the aerobic plate count was conducted following the Chinese national food safety standard [GB 4789.2-2016] [10]. Briefly, a 25 g raw milk or dairy product sample was added into 225 mL of 0.85% saline solution and homogenized for 2 min to prepare a 10−1 dilution. Serial dilutions were prepared with 0.85% saline solution. Three suitable serial dilutions were selected according to the contamination status of the samples. Next, 1 mL was aliquoted from each diluent, transferred into agar medium, and incubated for 48 h at 36 °C. All the colonies appearing on the plates were enumerated. The data were reported as log CFU/g of raw milk or dairy product. The limit of detection (LOD) of this method was 1 log10 CFU/mL.
The plate counts of aerobic Bacillus and thermophilic aerobic Bacillus were determined according to the methods of NEN 6813:2014 [11] and NEN 6809:2014 [12].
For aerobic Bacillus detection, a 25 g raw milk or dairy product sample was added into 225 mL of phosphate buffer and homogenized for 2 min to prepare a 10−1 dilution. A 10 mL diluted sample was transferred into a sterile tube, which was incubated in an 80 °C water bath for 10 min and then cooled in a 20 °C freezer. The cooled sample was diluted serially with phosphate buffer. Three suitable serial dilutions were selected according to the contamination status of the samples. Next, 1 mL was aliquoted from each diluent, transferred into milk plate count (MPC) agar medium, and incubated for 48 h at 36 °C. All the colonies appearing on the plates were enumerated. The data were reported as log CFU/g of raw milk or dairy product. The LOD of this method was 1 log10 CFU/mL.
For thermophilic aerobic Bacillus detection, a 25 g raw milk or dairy product sample was added into 225 mL of phosphate buffer and homogenized for 2 min to prepare a 10−1 dilution. A 10 mL diluted sample was transferred into a sterile tube, which was incubated in a 100 °C water bath for 30 min and then cooled in a 20 °C freezer. The cooled sample was diluted serially with phosphate buffer. Three suitable serial dilutions were selected according to the contamination status of the samples. Next, 1 mL was aliquoted from each diluent, transferred into dextrose tryptone agar (DTA) medium, and incubated for 48 h at 36 °C. All the colonies appearing on the plates were enumerated. The data were reported as log CFU/g of raw milk or dairy product. The LOD of this method was 1 log10 CFU/mL.
The alkaline phosphatase activity in raw milk and pasteurized milk was measured according to a modified chemiluminescent method [13]. Briefly, a 100 μL milk sample was added into a vial containing 0.5 mL of predispensed chemiluminescent substrate (Beijing Biotai, China) in buffer. The contents in the vial were mixed for 5 s, and the vial was attached to a NovaLUM adapter (Charm Sciences, Lawrence, MA, USA) and inserted upright into a NovaLUM analyzer. The fast alkaline phosphatase (F-AP) channel specific to the matrix in the NovaLUM analyzer was activated. The F-AP channel was equipped with a built-in timer and temperature monitor to complete the analysis in 45 s for raw milk or dairy product samples. The LOD of this method was 1.30 log10 mU/L (20 mU/L), and the LOQ was 1.78 log10 mU/L (60 mU/L).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum values, and 25th and 75th percentiles were calculated for each microbiological parameter using SPSS 16.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) [14]. Spearman’s correlation analysis was conducted using R, and a p value < 0.05 was indicative of a significant correlation. The values of the aerobic plate count, aerobic Bacillus count, and thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count <LOD were considered as 0, while the values of alkaline phosphatase activity <LOQ were also considered as 0. The correlation graph was produced using an online tool (http://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/plot_basic_corrplot_corrlation_plot_082, (accessed on 7 January 2023)) [15].

3. Results

3.1. Microbiological and Enzymatic Activity Analyses

The results of the microbiological and enzymatic activity analyses of raw and pasteurized milk are outlined in Table 1, and the results of sterilized milk are outlined in Table 2.
The contamination levels of the raw milk samples varied widely. The mean and median values of the aerobic plate count were far below the threshold set by the Chinese national food safety standard [GB19301-2010] (6.30 log10 CFU/mL). Approximately 9.89% (43/435) of samples had a contamination level higher than the threshold value. The proportions of aerobic Bacillus and thermophilic aerobic Bacillus were 54.02% (235/435) and 7.36% (32/435) in raw milk samples, respectively. Approximately 36.18% (157/434) of raw milk samples contained >500,000 mU/L (5.70 log10 mU/L) alkaline phosphatase activity.
For the pasteurized milk samples, the mean and median values of the aerobic plate count were far below the threshold (5.00 log10 CFU/mL). However, 2.22% (10/451) of samples showed a contamination level that was higher than the threshold value, indicating the low hygienic status of milk. The proportions of aerobic Bacillus and thermophilic aerobic Bacillus were 14.41% (65/451) and 4.88% (22/451) in pasteurized milk samples, respectively. The maximum values were 5.30 log10 CFU/mL and 3.81 log10 CFU/mL for the counts of aerobic Bacillus and thermophilic aerobic Bacillus, respectively. Approximately 9.71% (43/443) of pasteurized milk samples contained >350 mU/L (2.54 log10 CFU/mL) of alkaline phosphatase activity. Of the 43 samples, only 2 (4.65%) samples showed aerobic Bacillus count >1 log10 CFU/mL, and 1 (2.33%) sample showed thermophilic aerobic Bacillus above the LOD.
The contamination levels of the sterilized milk samples were very low. The proportion of aerobic Bacillus was 4.05% (25/617). The contamination of aerobic Bacillus in sterilized milk was 1.30% (8/617). The maximum values were 2.32 log10 CFU/mL and 1.34 log10 CFU/mL for the aerobic plate count and the aerobic Bacillus count, respectively. No thermophilic aerobic Bacillus was counted in the samples.

3.2. Correlation Analysis of Microbial Contamination and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity

The correlogram based on the Spearman correlation analysis revealed the influence of the aerobic plate count, counts of aerobic Bacillus and thermophilic aerobic Bacillus, alkaline phosphatase activity after comparing one to another for raw milk (Figure 1) and pasteurized milk (Figure 2), respectively.
For raw milk, there were positive correlations between the aerobic plate count, the aerobic Bacillus abundance, and the alkaline phosphatase activity (all p < 0.05), and the aerobic Bacillus abundance had positive correlations with the thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count and the alkaline phosphatase activity (both p < 0.05). Thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count was irrelevant in raw milk in the determination of correlations with the aerobic plate count and the alkaline phosphatase activity, respectively (both p > 0.05). The largest p value (0.29) was observed for the positive correlation between the aerobic plate count and the aerobic Bacillus abundance.
For pasteurized milk, there were positive correlations between the aerobic plate count, the aerobic Bacillus abundance, and the thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count (all p < 0.05); however, the alkaline phosphatase activity had negative correlations with the aerobic plate count, the aerobic Bacillus abundance, and the thermophilic aerobic Bacillus abundance (all p > 0.05). Similar to raw milk, the largest p value (0.36) was observed for the positive correlation between the aerobic plate count and the aerobic Bacillus abundance.

4. Discussion

Raw milk safety is crucial for both farmers’ income and human health, as well as for consumers paying more for safer dairy products [18]. Microbial contamination of raw milk originating from farms can increase spoilage and wastage and adversely affect producers, traders, and consumers [19]. The aerobic plate count is an important criterion for evaluating the microbial quality of raw milk as well as the degree of food freshness [20]. This criterion reflects the standards of primary operation procedures that include collection, transportation, and storage [18]. In our survey, nearly 10% of raw milk samples exceeded the Chinese legal limit (≤2 × 106 CFU/ mL). Although the legal limit is far below those of the EU and USA (<1 × 105 CFU/mL) [20], these results indicate that more attention should be given at the farm level, as most microorganisms are introduced into final dairy products at this stage.
Pasteurization does not have a significant impact on the nutritional value of raw milk [21]. This process is essential for ensuring the safety of milk and increasing its shelf life, because it reduces most heat-resistant and all other non-spore-forming microbes to safer levels, thereby increasing the safety and shelf-life. Factors affecting the shelf-life of pasteurized milk include storage temperature, post-pasteurization contamination, growth behaviors of contaminating bacteria, and incidence of Bacillus occurrence [22]. In most countries, the legal limits for aerobic plate count in pasteurized milk range from 5 × 103 to 5 × 105 CFU/mL [23]. According to the legal limit of China (<1 × 105 CFU/mL), approximately 2.22% of samples exceeded this threshold value, indicating the low hygienic status of milk. The acceptance limit for the aerobic plate count in pasteurized milk is ≤2 × 104 CFU/mL [23]. Although milk pasteurization is regarded as an effective method to eliminate foodborne pathogens, some reports on pathogen contamination in pasteurized milk clearly indicate that pasteurization alone is not the ultimate solution for the control of milk-borne pathogens [22,24,25]. However, pasteurization is still an optimized method that minimizes bacterial contamination and maintains high nutritive value [17].
Sterilized milk is created by heating milk through an ultra-high temperature process. This process can destroy nearly all microbes in milk, thereby increasing the shelf-life [26]. To achieve the legal microbe limit for sterilized milk in China (GB25190-2010), milk must be sterilized [27]. In this survey, only 4% of sterilized milk samples showed an aerobic plate count ≥1 log10 CFU/mL. A previous study demonstrated that most microorganisms present in sterilized milk were heat-treatment-resistant strains or those that originated from post-sterilization contamination [23].
The genus Bacillus is capable of overcoming the heat barrier during the sterilization of milk [28]. Some of these microorganisms can produce highly heat-resistant endospores, which may survive the ultra-high temperature process [6]. The aerobic Bacillus could not only affect the shelf-life of pasteurized and sterilized milk but is also associated with defects such as off flavors, sweet curdling, and bitter cream [6]. A previous study demonstrated that soiling on the udder and the teats is the major source of aerobic Bacillus contamination [8]. In this study, the proportions of aerobic Bacillus in raw milk, pasteurized milk, and sterilized milk were 54.02%, 14.41%, and 1.30%, respectively. Our results also showed that the proportions of thermophilic aerobic Bacillus were 7.36% and 4.88% in raw milk and pasteurized milk, respectively. A survey conducted in Tunisia found a high degree of diversity, both phenotypic and genotypic, among Bacillus isolates from milk samples. Seven Bacillus species, Bacillus cereus predominantly, were identified in pasteurized milk and sterilized milk and posed the risk of milk-borne illness to consumers [28]. Thus, it is important to minimize aerobic Bacillus contamination at the farm level. Moreover, our results showed that the aerobic plate count had a positive correlation with the aerobic Bacillus count in raw milk, and also had positive correlations with the aerobic Bacillus count and the thermophilic aerobic Bacillus in sterilized milk. Thus, good hygiene practices for the interior or the exterior of the udder and milking instruments during the milk production process must be implemented.
Alkaline phosphatase is a heat-sensitive enzyme found in raw milk that is used as a marker for the efficacy of thermal pasteurization. The absence of alkaline phosphatase activity has been used to confirm the benefits of pasteurization in dairy products for the past 80 years. A product that contains a small amount of active enzyme or no enzyme at all is considered properly pasteurized [9]. In our survey, a total of 36.18% of raw milk samples contained >500,000 mU/L alkaline phosphatase activity, which indicated widespread active enzyme. However, the value was decreased dramatically for pasteurized milk, with only 9.71% of samples containing >350 mU/L alkaline phosphatase activity based on EU guidelines (nos. 1664/2006 and 2074/2005), showing a good sterilizing effect. In the study of Ziobro and McElroy [9], nearly 14% (5/36) of pasteurized milk products showed >350 mU/L enzyme activity, which was higher than the value in this study.
The thermal denaturation parameters for alkaline phosphatase activity in milk were similar to those of heat-resistant milk pathogens [9]. Our results showed that alkaline phosphatase activity showed weak positive correlations with the aerobic plate count and the aerobic Bacillus count in raw milk. By contrast, the alkaline phosphatase activity showed weak negative correlations with the aerobic plate count, the aerobic Bacillus count, and even the thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count in pasteurized milk. Alkaline phosphatase has greater heat resistance than most aerobic microorganisms. Therefore, most microorganisms will inactivate more rapidly than this enzyme during thermal degradation. Our results of alkaline phosphatase activity showed a weak negative correlation with the thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count, although these microorganisms have more thermal resistance. These results indicated that the alkaline phosphatase activity had a weak correlation with the microbial loads. Thus, enzyme activity is only an indicator of temperature and time of the heat treatment, and not an indicator of microorganisms present. A previous study indicated that the alkaline phosphatase activity assay was affected by many factors, including the composition of the product and the presence of microbial alkaline phosphatase [29]. However, our results showed that of the 43 (9.71%) pasteurized milk samples containing alkaline phosphatase activity >350 mU/L, only 2.22% samples showed aerobic plate count exceeded the legal limit (1 × 105 CFU/mL) and 4.65% and 2.33% samples showed aerobic Bacillus count and thermophilic aerobic Bacillus > 1 log10 CFU/mL, respectively. These results illustrate that the alkaline phosphatase activity was a good indicator of the effectiveness of thermal pasteurization. Thus, detection and identification of the species of thermophilic aerobic Bacillus are necessary for the pasteurized milk samples with high alkaline phosphatase activity.

5. Conclusions

The output and consumption of dairy products in China have increased greatly in recent decades, and Chinese consumers have expressed increased demand for safe and healthy dairy products. Compared with other foods, dairy products are easily contaminated with microorganisms at farm, transportation, process, and storage stages and subject to rapid deterioration and foodborne diseases. Thus, further national-scale surveys of microbial contamination are needed for raw milk and dairy products.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the microbiological quality of raw milk and dairy products from 13 major dairy production and consumption provinces in China. Our results indicate that raw milk showed high microorganism contamination; however, the pasteurized milk and sterilized milk were sufficiently sterilized. In this study, we also improved our understanding about the correlation between microbial contamination and alkaline phosphatase activity. This study recommends that further studies be carried out to identify the contamination sources and the microorganism species contaminating pasteurized milk and sterilized milk.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph20031825/s1, Table S1: Sampling amount for each province.

Author Contributions

Sampling, microbiological, and enzymatic activity analyses, Z.P., Y.L., S.Y., L.Y. and D.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.P.; writing—review and editing, Z.P. and D.Y.; funding acquisition, Z.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32172314; 22193064) and the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Science (CIFMS 2019-I2M-5-024).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Belli, P.; Cantafora, A.; Stella, S.; Barbieri, S.; Crimella, C. Microbiological survey of milk and dairy products from a small scale dairy processing unit in Maroua (Cameroon). Food Control 2013, 32, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Keba, A.; Rolon, M.L.; Tamene, A.; Dessie, K.; Vipham, J.; Kovac, J.; Zewdu, A. Review of the prevalence of foodborne pathogens in milk and dairy products in Ethiopia. Int. Dairy J. 2020, 109, 104762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Berhanu, L.; Gume, B.; Kassa, T.; Dadi, L.S.; Tegegne, D.; Getnet, M.; Bediru, H.; Getaneh, A.; Suleman, S.; Mereta, S.T. Microbial quality of raw cow milk and its predictors along the dairy value chain in Southwest Ethiopia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 350, 109228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wu, X.; Lu, Y.; Xu, H.; Lv, M.; Hu, D.; He, Z.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Feng, Y. Challenges to improve the safety of dairy products in China. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 76, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Boor, K.J.; Wiedmann, M.; Murphy, S.; Alcaine, S. A 100-Year Review: Microbiology and safety of milk handling. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 9933–9951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Benahmed, M.; Leguerinel, I.; Moussa-Boudjemaa, B. Biodiversity, spoilage capacity and heat resistance of mesophilic aerobic spores isolated from milk powders marketed in Algeria. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2020, 73, 771–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sadiq, F.A.; Flint, S.; Yuan, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, T.; He, G. Propensity for biofilm formation by aerobic mesophilic and thermophilic spore forming bacteria isolated from Chinese milk powders. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 262, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sadiq, F.A.; Li, Y.; Liu, T.; Flint, S.; Zhang, G.; Yuan, L.; Pei, Z.; He, G. The heat resistance and spoilage potential of aerobic mesophilic and thermophilic spore forming bacteria isolated from Chinese milk powders. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 238, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ziobro, G.C.; McElroy, K.M. Fluorometric detection of active alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyl transferase in fluid dairy products from multiple species. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 892–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ying, L.; Pei, X.; Zhang, X.; Wu, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Ma, G.; Chen, Q.; Liang, H.; Yang, D. A surveillance of microbiological contamination on raw poultry meat at retail markets in China. Food Control 2019, 104, 99–104. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, H.; Tao, Y.; Gao, D.; Liu, G.; Chen, C.; Ren, N.; van Lier, J.B.; de Kreuk, M. Microbial population dynamics in response to increasing loadings of pre-hydrolyzed pig manure in an expanded granular sludge bed. Water Res. 2015, 87, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Eijlander, R.T.; Hekezen, R.V.; Bienvenue, A.; Girard, V.; Hoornstra, E.; Johnson, N.B.; Meyer, R.; Wagendorp, A.; Walker, D.C.; Wells-Bennik, M.H.J. Spores in dairy—New insights in detection, enumeration and risk assessment. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2019, 72, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Albillos, S.M.; Reddy, R.; Salter, R. Evaluation of alkaline phosphatase detection in dairy products using a modified rapid chemiluminescent method and official methods. J. Food Prot. 2011, 74, 1144–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. SPSS 16.0, Command Syntax Reference; SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2007.
  15. Che, L.; Yu, C.; Chen, G.; Lin, J.; Xie, Z.; Xia, T.; Luo, W.; Cai, X.; Liu, S. The Inflammatory Response Induced by RELMβ Upregulates IL-8 and IL-1β Expression in Bronchial Epithelial Cells in COPD. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. 2021, 16, 2503–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhu, Z.; Zhu, X.; Kong, F.; Guo, W. A rapid method on identifying disqualified raw goat’s milk based on total bacterial count by using dielectric spectra. J. Food Eng. 2018, 239, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ding, R.; Yang, S.; Geng, L.; Liu, Y.; He, B.; Liu, L.; Yue, X.; Wu, R.; Wu, J. Characterization of the core microflora and nutrient composition in packaged pasteurized milk products during storage. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 1279–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Knight-Jones, T.; Hang’Ombe, M.; Songe, M.; Sinkala, Y.; Grace, D. Microbial Contamination and Hygiene of Fresh Cow’s Milk Produced by Smallholders in Western Zambia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Martin, N.H.; Torres-Frenzel, P.; Wiedmann, M. Invited review: Controlling dairy product spoilage to reduce food loss and waste. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 1251–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Parseelan, A.; Muthu, S.; Kannan, P.; Ayyasamy, E.; Narayanan, R. Aerobic Plate Count of Milk and Dairy Products Marketed in Different Zones of Chennai. Int. J. Livest. Res. 2019, 9, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martini, M.; Salari, F.; Altomonte, I.; Ragona, G.; Piazza, A.; Gori, R.; Casati, D.; Brajon, G. Effects of pasteurization and storage conditions on donkey milk nutritional and hygienic characteristics. J. Dairy Res. 2018, 85, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lau, S.; Trmcic, A.; Martin, N.H.; Wiedmann, M.; Murphy, S.I. Development of a Monte Carlo simulation model to predict pasteurized fluid milk spoilage due to post-pasteurization contamination with gram-negative bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 1978–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Islam, M.A.; Roy, S.; Nabi, A.; Solaiman, S.; Rahman, M.; Huq, M.; Siddiquee, N.A.; Ahmed, N. Microbiological quality assessment of milk at different stages of the dairy value chain in a developing country setting. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 278, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhai, Z.; Cui, C.; Li, X.; Yan, J.; Sun, E.; Wang, C.; Guo, H.; Hao, Y. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and antibiotic resistance gene transfer of Bacillus strains isolated from pasteurized milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 106, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jia, Z.; Huang, L.; Wei, Z.; Yao, Y.; Fang, T.; Li, C. Dynamic kinetic analysis of growth of Listeria monocytogenes in pasteurized cow milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 2654–2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yang, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Wang, L.; Pang, L.; Zhang, D.; Man, C.; Jiang, Y. Assessment of the production of Bacillus cereus protease and its effect on the quality of ultra-high temperature-sterilized whole milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 6577–6587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xing, Q.; Fu, X.; Liu, Z.; Cao, Q.; You, C. Contents and evolution of potential furfural compounds in milk-based formula, ultra-high temperature milk and pasteurised yoghurt. Int. Dairy J. 2021, 120, 105086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aouadhi, C.; MAa Roufi, A.; Mejri, S. Incidence and characterisation of aerobic spore-forming bacteria originating from dairy milk in Tunisia. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2014, 67, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Patil, M.P.; Nagvekar, A.S.; Ingole, S.D.; Bharucha, S.V.; Palve, V.T. Somatic cell count and alkaline phosphatase activity in milk for evaluation of mastitis in buffalo. Vet. World 2015, 8, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Correlation between the aerobic plate count, aerobic Bacillus count, thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count, and alkaline phosphatase activity of raw milk samples. The p values are shown in circles. The p value > 0.05 is shown in the crossover line, and the other p values are <0.05. APC: aerobic plate count; AB: aerobic Bacillus count; TAB: thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count; APA: alkaline phosphatase activity.
Figure 1. Correlation between the aerobic plate count, aerobic Bacillus count, thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count, and alkaline phosphatase activity of raw milk samples. The p values are shown in circles. The p value > 0.05 is shown in the crossover line, and the other p values are <0.05. APC: aerobic plate count; AB: aerobic Bacillus count; TAB: thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count; APA: alkaline phosphatase activity.
Ijerph 20 01825 g001
Figure 2. Correlation between the aerobic plate count, aerobic Bacillus count, thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count, and alkaline phosphatase activity of pasteurized milk samples. The p values are shown in circles. All the p values are <0.05. APC: aerobic plate count; AB: aerobic Bacillus count; TAB: thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count; APA: alkaline phosphatase activity.
Figure 2. Correlation between the aerobic plate count, aerobic Bacillus count, thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count, and alkaline phosphatase activity of pasteurized milk samples. The p values are shown in circles. All the p values are <0.05. APC: aerobic plate count; AB: aerobic Bacillus count; TAB: thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count; APA: alkaline phosphatase activity.
Ijerph 20 01825 g002
Table 1. Microbiological results and threshold values for raw and pasteurized milk.
Table 1. Microbiological results and threshold values for raw and pasteurized milk.
Item *MilkMean ± SD ^MedianMinMax25th Perc.75th Perc.Threshold ValuesOver-Limit Ratio
APC log10 CFU/mLRaw4.55 ± 1.434.37<18.153.155.536.30 #9.89% (43/435)
Pasteurized2.83 ± 1.32<1<18.15<125.00 &2.22% (10/451)
AB log10 CFU/mLRaw2.00 ± 0.82<1<15.04<11.71__
Pasteurized1.67 ± 0.76<1<15.30<1<1__
TAB log10 CFU/mLRaw1.49 ± 0.44<1<12.48<1<1__
Pasteurized1.61 ± 0.76<1<13.81<1<1__
APA log10 mU/LRaw5.59 ± 0.405.651.966.685.515.82__
Pasteurized2.22 ± 0.38<1.78<1.783.53<1.782.082.54 @9.71% (43/443)
* APC: aerobic plate count; AB: aerobic Bacillus count; TAB: thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count; APA: alkaline phosphatase activity. ^ The mean ± SD only determined the value ≥LOD for APC, AB, and TAB or ≥LOQ for APA. # GB19301-2010 [16]. & GB19645-2010 [17]. @ Commission Regulation (EC) No 1664/2006 of 6 November 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 2074/2005 [13].
Table 2. Microbiological results and threshold values for sterilized milk.
Table 2. Microbiological results and threshold values for sterilized milk.
Item *Mean ± SD ^MedianMinMax25th Perc.75th Perc.
APC log10 CFU/mL1.45 ± 0.45<1<12.32<1<1
AB log10 CFU/mL1.08 ± 0.15<1<11.34<1<1
TAB log10 CFU/mL<1<1<1<1<1<1
* APC: aerobic plate count; AB: aerobic Bacillus count; TAB: thermophilic aerobic Bacillus count. ^ The mean ± SD only determined the value ≥LOD for APC, AB, and TAB.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, Z.; Li, Y.; Yan, L.; Yang, S.; Yang, D. Correlation Analysis of Microbial Contamination and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Raw Milk and Dairy Products. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1825. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031825

AMA Style

Peng Z, Li Y, Yan L, Yang S, Yang D. Correlation Analysis of Microbial Contamination and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Raw Milk and Dairy Products. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(3):1825. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031825

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Zixin, Ying Li, Lin Yan, Shuran Yang, and Dajin Yang. 2023. "Correlation Analysis of Microbial Contamination and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Raw Milk and Dairy Products" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 3: 1825. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031825

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop