Next Article in Journal
Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Health—A Cross-Sectional Survey Study
Previous Article in Journal
Human Gut Microbiota Plasticity throughout the Life Course
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 2
10.3390/ijerph20021462
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Plantar Flexor Stretching on Static and Dynamic Balance in Healthy Adults

by
Eui-Young Jung
1,†,
Jin-Hwa Jung
2,†,
Hwi-Young Cho
3,* and
Sung-Hyeon Kim
1,*
1
Department of Health Science, Gachon University Graduate School, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Occupational Therapy, Semyung University, Jecheon 27136, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Physical Therapy, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work as first authors.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1462; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021462
Submission received: 20 December 2022 / Revised: 10 January 2023 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 13 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Sport and Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Stretching can affect balance ability by generating biomechanical and physiological changes in the postural muscles. Stretching of the lower extremity muscles can greatly affect posture maintenance strategies and balance ability. However, the relationship between stretching and balance ability has not been clarified. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of plantar flexor stretching on balance ability. Forty-four healthy young adults were randomly assigned to four groups (static stretching, dynamic stretching, ballistic stretching, and control). Ankle joint range of motion, static balance ability, and dynamic balance ability were evaluated before, immediately after, and 20 min after stretching. Stretching did not affect balance ability in the open-eye condition. After stretching, the sway area was significantly reduced in the closed-eye condition (p < 0.05). After stretching, the reach distance of dynamic balance ability increased significantly (p < 0.05). The results show that plantar flexor stretching can positively affect balance ability. Therefore, plantar flexor stretching should be considered a rehabilitation method to improve balance.

1. Introduction

Balance is defined as the ability to maintain the center of mass within a base of support [1,2], and maintenance of balance is considered an essential factor for people to perform functional movements in daily life and recreational activities [3,4]. Functional movements include actions performed in daily life, such as sitting, standing, and gait, and various work or sports-related movements. These movements are performed and evaluated based on static and dynamic balance [5]. Static balance is the ability of an individual to maintain a certain posture against external and internal stimuli properly, and dynamic balance is the ability to maintain posture when moving weight or performing vigorous activities [5]. People with damage to the musculoskeletal system and nervous system, such as patients with plantar fasciitis or hip fracture, show a decrease in balance ability [6,7] and decreased balance reduces functional movement and increases the rate of falls, a major risk factor for injury and death [8]. Therefore, restoring and enhancing balance ability is essential for patients with musculoskeletal and nervous system injuries, the elderly, and people who require improvement of functional movements due to other problems.
Various forms of rehabilitation, including strengthening and stretching, are used to improve balance ability [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Multicomponent home-based rehabilitation, including strength, stretching, and balance, taking into account the individual’s home environment, was effective in improving balance and mobility in elderly patients after hip fracture surgery [9]. Similar to the improvement in balance ability through the application of various interventions, resistance strength training has been reported to be effective in improving balance and gait and functional movements, including chair rise and stair climbing [10]. Additionally, stretching is performed to warm-up and improve flexibility in clinic and sports facilities [17,18,19,20,21]. Stretching can cause adaptive changes in the range of motion (ROM), sensory perception, and passive torque by generating biomechanical and physiological changes in the muscles [22,23,24]. These adaptive changes in the lower body, including the calf muscles, can affect postural maintenance strategies and balance ability [25]. However, the effect of stretching on balance ability has yet to be clarified. Therefore, it is important to investigate the effects of postural muscle stretching on balance ability.
Various studies have investigated the relationship between stretching and balance. However, these studies reported inconsistent results on the relationship between the two factors. Martínez-Jiménez et al. [26] reported that static balance ability was improved after static stretching of the lower extremities in healthy adults. On the other hand, Lima et al. [27] reported that static balance ability decreased with an increase in ROM after stretching in young healthy adults. Additionally, Nelson et al. [28] suggested improvement in dynamic balance after stretching exercises, but there was no significant change after nonstretched intervention in nonbalance-trained individuals. Behm et al. [12] reported that muscle activity in healthy male university students after intermittent stretching was not significant, while balance and reaction/movement time was impaired. The difference in these results may be due to differences in the balance ability measurement method used to evaluate the stretching effect between previous studies. However, until now, the effect of different stretching methods on balance ability is unclear.
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of plantar flexor stretching on balance ability in healthy adults.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

Healthy young adults were recruited through bulletin boards, subway advertisements, and social network services. The inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: (1) having not received balance training; and (2) a score of 28 or higher on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) having not undergone lower extremity or lower back surgery within the past year; (2) pain or disease in the lower limbs or lower back; (3) a difference of more than 1 cm in leg length; (4) limited balance ability or vestibular function; (5) ankle joint being out of normal alignment; and (6) neurological or musculoskeletal disorders. A total of 62 people volunteered for the study; of them, 44 participated in the study. Participants signed the research consent form after being informed about the study procedures, benefits, and risks of side effects. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gachon University (number: 1044396-202108-HR-177-01).
The sample size was calculated using G-power software (version 3.1.9.4; Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany) [29,30]. The effect size f was set to 0.25, alpha level was set to 0.05, and power was set to 0.8 [31]. Consequently, a sample size of 40 was required. Considering a dropout rate of 10%, 45 participants were required.

2.2. Procedure

This study was a single-blind randomized controlled trial. A flow chart in this study is shown in Figure 1. Before the participants were assigned to groups, their general characteristics (gender, age, height, weight, dominant foot, and leg length) were recorded. The dominant foot was defined as that used more than twice during the following actions: (1) kicking a ball; (2) climbing a step box; and (3) stepping on a target. The participants were stratified by gender and dominant foot and divided into four blocks. They were then randomly assigned to one of four groups (static stretch group, dynamic stretch group, ballistic stretch group, and control). Assessments were performed at three time-points (pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 20 min after the intervention). All interventions were performed by physical therapists with more than three years of clinical experience. All assessments were performed by a separate researcher who did not participate in the intervention.

2.3. Intervention

All stretching groups repeated four 45 s stretches with a 15 s rest between sets [32,33]. The control group was allowed to sit on a chair and rest for the same duration as the intervention time in the stretching group (4 min).

2.3.1. Static Stretching

The participants placed both hands on the wall in front of them and their dominant leg one step back (Figure 2A). They were then asked to shift their weight forward while keeping the heel of the back leg on the floor. After shifting their weight until just before uncomfortable sensations occurred, they were asked to maintain their posture.

2.3.2. Ballistic Stretching

After assuming the same posture as for static stretching, the participants were instructed to move up and down using a rebound at the end of the ROM (Figure 2B). They were instructed to repeat the active movement twice per second (2–5°).

2.3.3. Dynamic Stretching

After assuming the same posture as for static stretching, the participants were instructed to repeatedly raise and lower the heel of the dominant leg (Figure 2C,D). They were instructed to repeat the active movement once per second.

2.4. Measurements

The evaluation was performed before and after stretching and 20 min after stretching. All evaluation methods were performed after familiarization with ≥10 min of pre-stretching practice.

2.4.1. Ankle Joint ROM

Passive joint ROM of dorsiflexion of the ankle joint was evaluated using a goniometer with high reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.68–0.89). The ROM for dorsiflexion was measured as the angle between the line connecting the fibula head and outer malleolus and the longitudinal axis of the 5th metatarsal bone [34].

2.4.2. Balance Ability

Balance ability was evaluated using static and dynamic balance. Static balance was evaluated using an AMTI AccuSway force plate with high reliability (ICC, 0.91–0.99) [35]. During the static balance assessment, the participants were instructed to: (1) turn the dominant foot about 15° outward; (2) look at the sign at eye level located 2 m in front; (3) cross both hands and fix them in front of the chest; and (4) lift the feet of the non-dominant leg more than 10 cm from the floor. Static balance was measured by perturbation of the center of pressure for 20 s. As for the resulting data, the data for the middle 10 s were used in the analysis. Static balance was repeatedly measured three times each with the eyes open and closed.
Dynamic balance was evaluated using the Y-balance test with high reliability (ICC, 0.82–0.87) [36]. During the dynamic balance assessment, participants were instructed to (1) align the tip of the big toe of the dominant leg with the cross shape marked in the center; (2) lift the non-dominant leg and stand on one leg; (3) fix both hands next to the waist; and (4) reach the non-dominant leg to the maximum extent in three directions (frontal, lateral posterior, medial posterior). The measurements were repeated three times for each direction. The resulting data were standardized by dividing the reach by leg length.

2.5. Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software (version 25.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used for normality testing. The participants’ general characteristics were compared using the chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance. Balance ability was compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance, and the significance level was corrected using Tukey’s honest significant difference test. Significance was set at α = 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Patients’ General Characteristics

Forty-four participants completed the study; there were no dropouts. The participants’ general characteristics are presented in Table 1.

3.2. Balance Ability

3.2.1. Static Balance Ability

The static balance ability in the eyes-open condition is shown in Table 2. There was no intergroup difference in static balance ability in the eyes-open condition. The static balance ability in the eyes-closed condition is shown in Table 3. With the eyes closed, the sway area differed significantly before versus after the intervention in the stretching group (p < 0.05). The dynamic stretching group showed additional significant changes in sway velocity (p < 0.05). However, no significant intergroup differences were noted.

3.2.2. Dynamic Balance Ability

Dynamic balance ability is presented in Table 4. All reach distances in the three directions showed significant improvements in the stretching group (p < 0.05). The stretching group showed a significant difference from the control group in the anterior direction (p < 0.05). No significant differences were noted between the stretching groups.

3.3. Ankle Joint ROM

The ROM of the ankle joints is listed in Table 5. The stretching group showed a significant improvement in ankle joint ROM, and a significant difference from the control group was noted. In contrast, no significant differences were noted between the stretching groups.

4. Discussion

This study aimed to investigate the effects of plantar flexor stretching on static and dynamic balance in healthy adults. In all stretching groups, ankle joint ROM, balance ability in the eyes-closed condition, and dynamic balance ability improved after the intervention. Differences among stretching types appeared only in sway velocity in the eyes-closed condition; none were seen in other variables. These results suggest that stretching of the ankle plantar flexors can improve balance ability regardless of type.
Stretching induces biomechanical and physiological changes within the muscles that can alter muscle activation, strength, and kinesthetic awareness [23,24,37]. It can also cause viscoelastic changes in the muscle-tendon unit, resulting in increased muscle length and joint ROM. These factors can affect postural control.
Several studies, including that of Ryan et al. [38], reported improvements in balance after stretching [26,28,39]. In contrast, our results showed no significant change in static balance in the eyes-open condition after stretching. However, our results showed that static balance in the eyes-closed condition and dynamic balance significantly improved. Unlike the Ryan et al. study, which applied stretching to multiple joints and muscles, this study applied stretching to a single muscle. This difference indicates that stretching a single muscle has a weaker effect on balance in a stable situation than stretching multiple muscles. On the other hand, stretching a single muscle can affect balance ability in more challenging situations (increased dependence on somatosensory and dynamic situations).
Depending on the stretching time, this effect can be observed in several ways. Lewis et al. [40] reported that stretching for >2 min did not affect static balance ability. Behm et al. [12] reported a decrease in static balance ability after stretching for more than 2 min in four muscles. Conversely, studies that applied stretching within 1 min reported improvements in static balance [38,39]. This suggests that, due to the viscoelastic characteristics of the muscle, the biomechanical and physiological responses to the muscle appear differently depending on stretching time, which may have different effects on balance ability [41]. Stretching at an appropriate time can prevent unnecessary movement and improve balance by increasing muscle sensory input, sensitivity, and ROM [23,24,42]. Conversely, long-term stretching can lead to a decrease in balance ability by reducing the passive torque of the muscles required to maintain posture [43]. This study applied stretching for 3 min (four 45 s sessions), which is relatively longer than that used in previous studies. However, since the intervention was applied to a single muscle, it did not induce a decline in static balance ability; thus, it is thought to have shown a trend similar to that reported by Lewis [40]. In addition, long-term stretching is thought to increase the ankle joint ROM and improve ankle motion, leading to an improved ability to maintain dynamic equilibrium [42,44].
Previous studies reported differences in balance ability depending on stretching type. However, our study found no difference according to stretching type. As mentioned above, this is considered due to the application of long-term stretching in this study. Since we applied long-term stretching, the muscle elongation and stimulation reached the anatomical limit regardless of stretching type. As a result, no difference was noted between stretching groups in ankle joint ROM or balance ability.
This study confirmed the effect of plantar flexor stretching on balance. However, our study had some limitations. First, because the sample size was small, it is difficult to generalize the study’s results. Second, this study included a limited population. We included only young adults, a high proportion of whom were male. These results may differ for different age groups and gender ratios. Third, the anatomical changes in the muscles and differences in body composition were not evaluated. We indirectly measured muscle changes due to stretching by measuring ankle ROM. As a result, the factors that cause stretching to affect balance other than muscle length and joint angle could not be identified directly. Finally, different stretching times were not applied. The physiological and anatomical effects on the muscles may vary depending on the stretching type and duration. Future studies should analyze changes in balance ability under various intervention conditions.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study show that stretching of the plantar flexor muscle improves static balance ability in the eyes-closed condition as well as the dynamic balance ability. Therefore, plantar flexor stretching should be considered a rehabilitation method to improve balance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.-Y.J. and H.-Y.C.; methodology, E.-Y.J., S.-H.K. and H.-Y.C.; visualization, E.-Y.J.; writing—original draft, E.-Y.J. and S.-H.K.; data curation, J.-H.J. and S.-H.K.; investigation, J.-H.J. and S.-H.K.; validation, H.-Y.C.; and writing—review and editing, H.-Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a Semyung University Research Grant of 2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gachon University (number: 1044396-202108-HR-177-01).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We express our deep gratitude to all participants and the researchers who performed the measurement and analysis of the experiment in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shumway-Cook, A.; Horak, F.B. Assessing the influence of sensory interaction of balance. Suggestion from the field. Phys. Ther. 1986, 66, 1548–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. In, T.S.; Jung, J.H.; Jang, S.H.; Kim, K.H.; Jung, K.S.; Cho, H.Y. Effects of Light Touch on Balance in Patients with Stroke. Open Med. 2019, 14, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Shin, H.J.; Jung, J.H.; Kim, S.H.; Hahm, S.C.; Cho, H.Y. A Comparison of the Transient Effect of Complex and Core Stability Exercises on Static Balance Ability and Muscle Activation during Static Standing in Healthy Male Adults. Healthcare 2020, 8, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Johansson, J.; Nordström, A.; Gustafson, Y.; Westling, G.; Nordström, P. Increased postural sway during quiet stance as a risk factor for prospective falls in community-dwelling elderly individuals. Age Ageing 2017, 46, 964–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Muehlbauer, T.; Grundmann, A.; Vortkamp, L.; Schedler, S. Effect of balance training on static and dynamic balance performance in male adolescents: Role of training frequency. BMC Res. Notes 2022, 15, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Petrofsky, J.; Donatelli, R.; Laymon, M.; Lee, H. Greater Postural Sway and Tremor during Balance Tasks in Patients with Plantar Fasciitis Compared to Age-Matched Controls. Healthcare 2020, 8, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lee, H.; Lee, S.H. Effectiveness of multicomponent home-based rehabilitation in older patients after hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Nurs. 2023, 32, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pua, Y.H.; Ong, P.H.; Clark, R.A.; Matcher, D.B.; Lim, E.C. Falls efficacy, postural balance, and risk for falls in older adults with falls-related emergency department visits: Prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2017, 17, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lee, H.; Lee, S.H. Effectiveness of Multicomponent Home-Based Rehabilitation in Elderly Patients after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, C.J.; Latham, N.K. Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009, 2009, CD002759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hess, J.A.; Woollacott, M. Effect of high-intensity strength-training on functional measures of balance ability in balance-impaired older adults. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 2005, 28, 582–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Behm, D.G.; Bambury, A.; Cahill, F.; Power, K. Effect of acute static stretching on force, balance, reaction time, and movement time. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2004, 36, 1397–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Costa, P.B.; Graves, B.S.; Whitehurst, M.; Jacobs, P.L. The acute effects of different durations of static stretching on dynamic balance performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2009, 23, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lim, K.I.; Nam, H.C.; Jung, K.S. Effects on hamstring muscle extensibility, muscle activity, and balance of different stretching techniques. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2014, 26, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chatzopoulos, D.; Galazoulas, C.; Patikas, D.; Kotzamanidis, C. Acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on balance, agility, reaction time and movement time. J. Sport. Sci. Med. 2014, 13, 403–409. [Google Scholar]
  16. Leblebici, H.; Yarar, H.; Aydın, E.M.; Zorlu, Z.; Ertaş, U.; Kıngır, M.E. The acute effects of different stretching on dynamic balance performance. Int. J. Sport. Stud. 2017, 7, 153–159. [Google Scholar]
  17. Malliaropoulos, N.; Papalexandris, S.; Papalada, A.; Papacostas, E. The role of stretching in rehabilitation of hamstring injuries: 80 athletes follow-up. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2004, 36, 756–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Page, P. Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation. Int. J. Sport. Phys. Ther. 2012, 7, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pescatello, L.S.; Riebe, D.; Thompson, P.D. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shellock, F.G.; Prentice, W.E. Warming-up and stretching for improved physical performance and prevention of sports-related injuries. Sport. Med. 1985, 2, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Small, K.; Mc Naughton, L.; Matthews, M. A systematic review into the efficacy of static stretching as part of a warm-up for the prevention of exercise-related injury. Res. Sport. Med. 2008, 16, 213–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Trajano, G.S.; Nosaka, K.; Blazevich, A.J. Intermittent stretch reduces force and central drive more than continuous stretch. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2014, 46, 902–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Walsh, G.S. Effect of static and dynamic muscle stretching as part of warm up procedures on knee joint proprioception and strength. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2017, 55, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Avela, J.; Kyröläinen, H.; Komi, P.V. Altered reflex sensitivity after repeated and prolonged passive muscle stretching. J. Appl. Physiol. 1999, 86, 1283–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, K.B.; Park, Y.H.; Song, E.K.; Yoon, T.R.; Jung, K.I. Static and dynamic postural balance after successful mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2010, 91, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Martínez-Jiménez, E.M.; Losa-Iglesias, M.E.; Díaz-Velázquez, J.I.; Becerro-De-Bengoa-Vallejo, R.; Palomo-López, P.; Calvo-Lobo, C.; López-López, D.; Rodríguez-Sanz, D. Acute Effects of Intermittent Versus Continuous Bilateral Ankle Plantar Flexor Static Stretching on Postural Sway and Plantar Pressures: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Lima, B.N.; Lucareli, P.R.; Gomes, W.A.; Silva, J.J.; Bley, A.S.; Hartigan, E.H.; Marchetti, P.H. The acute effects of unilateral ankle plantar flexors static- stretching on postural sway and gastrocnemius muscle activity during single-leg balance tasks. J. Sports. Sci. Med. 2014, 13, 564–570. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nelson, A.G.; Kokkonen, J.; Arnall, D.A.; Li, L. Acute stretching increases postural stability in nonbalance trained individuals. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2012, 26, 3095–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.G.; Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Aanalysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  32. Unick, J.; Kieffer, H.S.; Cheesman, W.; Feeney, A. The acute effects of static and ballistic stretching on vertical jump performance in trained women. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2005, 19, 206–212. [Google Scholar]
  33. O’Sullivan, K.; Murray, E.; Sainsbury, D. The effect of warm-up, static stretching and dynamic stretching on hamstring flexibility in previously injured subjects. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2009, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Krause, D.A.; Cloud, B.A.; Forster, L.A.; Schrank, J.A.; Hollman, J.H. Measurement of ankle dorsiflexion: A comparison of active and passive techniques in multiple positions. J. Sport Rehabil. 2011, 20, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Muehlbauer, T.; Roth, R.; Mueller, S.; Granacher, U. Intra and intersession reliability of balance measures during one-leg standing in young adults. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2011, 25, 2228–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kinzey, S.J.; Armstrong, C.W. The reliability of the star-excursion test in assessing dynamic balance. J. Orthop. Sport. Phys. Ther. 1998, 27, 356–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Horak, F.B. Postural orientation and equilibrium: What do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing 2006, 35 (Suppl 2), ii7–ii11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ryan, E.E.; Rossi, M.D.; Lopez, R. The effects of the contract-relax-antagonist-contract form of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on postural stability. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2010, 24, 1888–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Palmer, T.B.; Agu-Udemba, C.C.; Palmer, B.M. Acute effects of static stretching on passive stiffness and postural balance in healthy, elderly men. Physician Sportsmed. 2018, 46, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lewis, N.L.; Brismée, J.M.; James, C.R.; Sizer, P.S.; Sawyer, S.F. The effect of stretching on muscle responses and postural sway responses during computerized dynamic posturography in women and men. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2009, 90, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Avela, J.; Finni, T.; Liikavainio, T.; Niemelä, E.; Komi, P.V. Neural and mechanical responses of the triceps surae muscle group after 1 h of repeated fast passive stretches. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004, 96, 2325–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hoch, M.C.; Staton, G.S.; McKeon, P.O. Dorsiflexion range of motion significantly influences dynamic balance. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2011, 14, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ross, S.E.; Guskiewicz, K.M.; Gross, M.T.; Yu, B. Balance measures for discriminating between functionally unstable and stable ankles. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2009, 41, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Davlin, C.D. Dynamic balance in high level athletes. Percept. Mot. Ski. 2004, 98, 1171–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 20 01462 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart in this study.
Figure 1. Flow chart in this study.
Ijerph 20 01462 g001
Ijerph 20 01462 g002 550
Figure 2. Stretching position. (A). Static stretching. (B). Ballistic stretching. (C). Dynamic stretching: raising the heel. (D). Dynamic stretching: lowering the heel.
Figure 2. Stretching position. (A). Static stretching. (B). Ballistic stretching. (C). Dynamic stretching: raising the heel. (D). Dynamic stretching: lowering the heel.
Ijerph 20 01462 g002
Table
Table 1. Participants’ general characteristics.
Table 1. Participants’ general characteristics.
VariableSGDGBGCGp Value
Gender a,* (M/F)9/29/29/29/21.000
Side a,* (Rt./Lt.)11/010/19/210/10.532
Age b,# (years)26.09 ± 1.7626.27 ± 1.6826.73 ± 2.1527.45 ± 3.170.507
Height b,# (cm)169.82 ± 7.55174.35 ± 7.98172.09 ± 7.11173.64 ± 6.330.481
Weight b,# (kg)71.64 ± 14.2477.18 ± 19.7667.64 ± 11.3171.34 ± 9.950.485
BMI b,# (kg/m2)24.63 ± 3.2725.07 ± 4.6522.69 ± 2.3823.56 ± 2.130.326
CAIT b,# (score)29.00 ± 0.8928.82 ± 0.8729.45 ± 0.8229.00 ± 0.890.374
BG, ballistic stretch group; BMI, body mass index; CAIT, Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool; CG, control group; DG, dynamic stretch group; F, female; LT., left; M, male; Rt., right; SG, static stretch group. a Expressed as number of participants; b Expressed as mean ± standard deviation. * Analyzed using the chi-square test; # Analyzed using one-way analysis of variance.
Table
Table 2. Static balance ability in the eyes-open condition.
Table 2. Static balance ability in the eyes-open condition.
VariablePre-InterventionPost-InterventionFollow-UpANOVA
p Value		Post-Hoc
Pre vs. PostPre vs. FollowPost vs. Follow
Sway area (mm2)SG6.21 ± 2.376.91 ± 2.507.22 ± 2.600.7590.8530.7590.906
DG7.40 ± 2.117.67 ± 2.618.91 ± 3.160.9770.5420.207
BG8.00 ± 3.747.01 ± 1.846.83 ± 2.320.7310.6930.969
CG8.22 ± 2.569.67 ± 7.989.42 ± 9.160.6310.7740.933
Path length (mm)SG43.03 ± 9.4843.24 ± 6.5142.62 ± 8.200.5000.9980.9910.913
DG50.66 ± 13.7750.44 ± 10.0149.50 ± 9.050.9980.9300.809
BG45.15 ± 7.7043.38 ± 9.8042.07 ± 9.480.8630.6010.667
CG52.41 ± 15.1956.18 ± 15.8051.93 ± 15.120.1540.8150.052
Sway velocity (mm/s)SG4.30 ± 0.954.32 ± 0.654.26 ± 0.820.6480.9980.9910.906
DG5.07 ± 1.385.04 ± 1.004.95 ± 0.910.9980.9290.796
BG4.51 ± 0.774.34 ± 0.984.21 ± 0.950.8570.5970.646
CG5.24 ± 1.525.62 ± 1.585.19 ± 1.510.1340.8380.093
ANOVA, analysis of variance; BG, ballistic stretch group; CG, control group; DG, dynamic stretch group; SG, static stretch group.
Table
Table 3. Static balance ability in the eyes-closed condition.
Table 3. Static balance ability in the eyes-closed condition.
VariablePre-InterventionPost-InterventionFollow-UpANOVA
p Value		Post-Hoc
Pre vs. PostPre vs. FollowPost vs. Follow
Sway area (mm2)SG23.02 ± 7.3018.90 ± 6.0421.91 ± 6.960.2570.0390.8880.294
DG25.97 ± 11.0321.10 ± 7.8222.19 ± 5.700.0420.2630.605
BG26.05 ± 7.5722.41 ± 5.4824.28 ± 6.310.0460.7390.618
CG24.91 ± 7.4823.28 ± 8.2624.41 ± 7.930.9880.8020.837
Path length (mm)SG83.54 ± 19.3882.23 ± 18.6083.73 ± 21.660.8260.9540.9990.888
DG97.22 ± 19.9183.33 ± 14.3588.17 ± 18.710.0090.1200.304
BG88.27 ± 19.2483.37 ± 17.7783.77 ± 16.390.5230.5690.992
CG78.93 ± 29.7877.14 ± 27.7975.93 ± 28.110.9160.7760.925
Sway velocity (mm/s)SG8.35 ± 1.948.22 ± 1.868.37 ± 2.170.3650.9540.9990.888
DG9.72 ± 1.998.33 ± 1.438.82 ± 1.870.0090.1220.305
BG8.83 ± 1.928.34 ± 1.788.38 ± 1.640.5260.5740.992
CG9.14 ± 2.358.92 ± 1.998.80 ± 2.080.8790.7370.933
ANOVA, analysis of variance; BG, ballistic stretch group; CG, control group; DG, dynamic stretch group; SG, static stretch group.
Table
Table 4. Dynamic balance ability.
Table 4. Dynamic balance ability.
VariablePre-InterventionPost-InterventionFollow-UpANOVA
p Value		Post-Hoc
Pre vs. PostPre vs. FollowPost vs. Follow
YANTSG69.46 ± 7.0772.08 ± 7.16 a72.74 ± 8.17 a0.016<0.0010.0020.393
DG68.01 ± 6.2970.57 ± 6.52 a70.21 ± 6.80 a0.0420.0460.412
BG68.36 ± 4.4570.94 ± 3.88 a70.57 ± 3.72 a<0.001<0.0010.060
CG66.58 ± 6.2667.03 ± 6.3066.72 ± 6.030.7440.9860.805
YMEDSG103.19 ± 11.51106.88 ± 10.97106.27 ± 12.12<0.0010.0010.0170.729
DG98.62 ± 7.14103.80 ± 8.63104.63 ± 7.70<0.001<0.0010.563
BG99.58 ± 8.22105.25 ± 8.00107.05 ± 7.03<0.001<0.0010.077
CG104.07 ± 11.71104.14 ± 11.58104.47 ± 10.540.9980.9270.910
YLATSG99.27 ± 12.57103.37 ± 13.15102.95 ± 13.85<0.001<0.0010.0020.849
DG94.07 ± 10.73100.06 ± 10.88100.94 ± 10.73<0.001<0.0010.488
BG93.57 ± 9.3397.84 ± 8.8498.07 ± 7.97<0.001<0.0010.138
CG98.05 ± 15.3698.57 ± 13.9799.72 ± 14.140.8350.2370.297
YSUMSG90.64 ± 9.2194.11 ± 9.0893.99 ± 10.00<0.001<0.001<0.0010.969
DG86.90 ± 7.3693.48 ± 8.1091.93 ± 7.81<0.001<0.0010.294
BG87.17 ± 6.6991.34 ± 6.3491.90 ± 5.58<0.001<0.0010.342
CG89.57 ± 9.5789.91 ± 9.0390.30 ± 8.800.8170.5230.732
ANOVA, analysis of variance; BG, ballistic stretch group; CG, control group; DG, dynamic stretch group; SG, static stretch group; YANT, Y-balance test anterior side; YLAT, Y-balance test lateral-posterior side; YMED, Y-balance test medial-posterior side; YSUM, Y-balance test sum. a Indicates significant difference from control group (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 5. Ankle joint ROM.
Table 5. Ankle joint ROM.
VariablePre-InterventionPost-InterventionFollow-UpANOVA
p-Value		Post-Hoc
Pre vs. PostPre vs. FollowPost vs. Follow
ROMSG18.46 ± 3.7723.42 ± 3.63 a22.36 ± 3.50<0.001<0.001<0.0010.021
DG19.70 ± 2.5424.27 ± 2.31 a23.33 ± 2.97 a<0.001<0.0010.045
BG18.58 ± 3.2923.21 ± 3.69 a22.67 ± 3.30 a<0.001<0.0010.332
CG18.70 ± 3.9618.79 ± 3.9318.67 ± 3.950.9740.9970.945
ANOVA, analysis of variance; BG, ballistic stretch group; CG, control group; DG, dynamic stretch group; ROM, range of motion; SG, static stretch group. a Indicates significant difference from control group (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, E.-Y.; Jung, J.-H.; Cho, H.-Y.; Kim, S.-H. Effects of Plantar Flexor Stretching on Static and Dynamic Balance in Healthy Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1462. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021462

AMA Style

Jung E-Y, Jung J-H, Cho H-Y, Kim S-H. Effects of Plantar Flexor Stretching on Static and Dynamic Balance in Healthy Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(2):1462. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021462

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jung, Eui-Young, Jin-Hwa Jung, Hwi-Young Cho, and Sung-Hyeon Kim. 2023. "Effects of Plantar Flexor Stretching on Static and Dynamic Balance in Healthy Adults" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 2: 1462. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021462

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop