Next Article in Journal
Using Heart Rate Variability Methods for Health-Related Outcomes in Outdoor Contexts: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
Physical Activity and Sleep in Adults and Older Adults in Southern Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Public Engagement in Digital Recommendations for Promoting Healthy Parental Behaviours from Preconception through the First 1000 Days
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bodily Practices and Healthy Bodies: Representations of Gymnastics in a Brazilian Women’s Magazine (1940–1950)
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Determinants of Outdoor Time in Children and Youth: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal and Intervention Studies

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1328; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021328
by Richard Larouche 1,*, Madeline Kleinfeld 1, Ulises Charles Rodriguez 1, Cheryl Hatten 2, Victoria Hecker 1, David R. Scott 3, Leanna Marie Brown 1, Ogochukwu K. Onyeso 1, Farzana Sadia 1 and Hanako Shimamura 4
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1328; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021328
Submission received: 8 December 2022 / Revised: 8 January 2023 / Accepted: 9 January 2023 / Published: 11 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health-Related Physical Activity and Exercise)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Very interesting and high-quality review. I only suggest format improvements, not content, which are as comments in the attached file.


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is basically well written and the study was conducted in a serious and rigorous manner. The topic being investigated is though not academically interesting. More work has to be done to justify the reason for the need to understanding about OT, as its benefits of OT are quite obvious. OT in children and youth (aged 0-17 years) sounds way too broad. I do not feel like it is a homogeneous group at all. There are also too many tables and most of them are too long therefore difficult for readers to follow. Not necessary to include the main results of each study (Table 2). It is also not necessary to list out all the determinants in each study (Table 3).

Author Response

Please see the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

see file attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop