1. Introduction
Physical inactivity has been found to be among the main factors that increase disease and mortality rates, causing 6–10% of major non-communicable diseases worldwide [
1,
2]. In contrast, physical activity (PA) has been found to provide many health benefits [
3]—both physical [
4,
5,
6] and psychological [
7,
8,
9,
10]—and contribute to the prevention and reduction of risks associated with several diseases [
11,
12,
13,
14]. Due to the importance of PA, the World Health Organization (WHO) has established guidelines for PA practice, with variations for different age and population groups [
15]. Physical inactivity is defined as failure to accumulate at least 150 min of moderate PA or 75 min of vigorous PA or the combination of both intensities per week, whereas being physically active is related to complying the guidelines established by the WHO [
16].
Globally, it is estimated that 3 out of 10 people aged 15 or more do not meet the recommendation of at least 150 min of moderate PA per week [
17]. Moreover, recent research continues to find that women engage in less PA than men [
18,
19]. On the one hand, stereotypes and gender roles are among the main factors contributing to this situation and that PA remains particularly male-oriented, which in turn may lead to greater drop out among women [
20]. On the other hand, women are often directed towards taking responsibility for caregiving tasks and putting the needs of others before their own. This often results in little room for leisure [
21,
22] or low-quality leisure [
23], which may affect their level of PA. Additionally, inactivity is heightened among working-age women due to the diversity of situations that occur at that life stage, such as entering the labour market, leaving parents’ home, motherhood, or caregiving [
24,
25,
26,
27]. Due to the plurality of factors and the interaction between them, women should be considered a heterogeneous group with diverse realities [
28]. Accordingly, in addition to the feminist perspective on leisure and active life, socio-ecological perspectives could be of great use to address and understand this complexity, as they emphasise the relationships that people have with their physical and socio-cultural environment [
29,
30].
Public institutions generally aim to promote PA among the entire population [
31,
32]. However, despite many existing studies regarding the factors associated with inactivity and PA among different age groups [
33,
34,
35] and especially among adult women [
36,
37], conducting a contextualised assessment before designing, developing, and implementing public policies to promote PA among women is still necessary and beneficial [
38]. While considerable progress has been made in identifying women’s PA patterns, there is still a need to develop questionnaires that are meaningful to women, culturally relevant, short, and easily understood by people from diverse backgrounds [
39]. In this regard, an ad hoc questionnaire may be an appropriate tool to learn about women’s perceptions of PA. Thus, public institutions responsible for promoting PA could have accurate initial information on the needs perceived by those involved and be able to accordingly propose effective actions. However, in addition to being adapted to the context of intervention, self-administered questionnaires that assess PA in adults should be easy to fill out for the target population and yield verified validity and measurement properties [
40]. The aforementioned authors note the existence of numerous scales and questionnaires that assess PA in adults but stress that it is up to the researchers themselves to determine which questionnaire best suits their purposes. Consequently, available measurement tools may not always respond to the complexity of the study context, lack evidence of reliability or validity, or simply not be useful for the institution responsible for developing and implementing PA policies [
40].
Considering the above, having questionnaires to determine both inactivity and PA levels that are validated and specific for distinct population groups seems to be essential. Therefore, the aims of the study were: (a) to design an ad hoc multidimensional tool to assess leisure time physical activity (LTPA) and leisure time sedentary behaviours of adult women (18–65 years) from Gipuzkoa (Spain); (b) to analyse the questionnaire’s content validity, ecological validity, and internal consistency; and (c) to describe LTPA and sedentary behaviours of adult women from Gipuzkoa.
4. Discussion
The main purpose of this study was to develop a valid multidimensional questionnaire to measure and describe LTPA participation and sedentary behaviours of adult women in Gipuzkoa as a basis for the implementation of specific policies by the Provincial Council of Gipuzkoa to promote PA. Though self-administered questionnaires designed to measure PA level and assess sedentary behaviours among adults [
40,
53,
54,
55,
56,
57], according to Ainsworth [
39], the design and validation of ad hoc questionnaires aimed exclusively at women is still needed. These questionnaires should address the gender-specific barriers to LTPA participation perceived by women and consider their heterogeneous and diverse nature [
28]. Likewise, socio-ecological perspectives [
30] might help understand the reasons behind these women’s physical inactivity based on their circumstances and provide relevant information about their physical and socio-cultural environment. Therefore, we tried to ensure that the data extracted from the GWPAQ represent the complex reality of adult women of Gipuzkoa. With this approach, it would be possible to identify and understand the factors leading women to inactivity and provide public institutions with evidence aimed at designing, developing, and implementing suitable strategies for PA promotion.
4.1. Content Validity, Ecological Validity, and Internal Consistency
Questionnaire validation is necessary before application and is usually carried out by researchers [
55,
57,
58]. One of the most common methodologies is content validation [
59]. In the present study, six experts designed the questionnaire, which was later assessed by an expert panel in women’s PA promotion. Their contribution led to modifications of content, adequacy, and clarity in several dimensions and items. Furthermore, given the questionnaire was aimed at a specific population—the adult women of Gipuzkoa—its ecological validity was assessed by three sport management experts, as Sabariego et al. [
60] did. Their main contributions were related to content contextualisation and barriers to LTPA in terms of usefulness, suitability, and coherence. Lastly, the internal consistency of all items was evaluated, with acceptable results. Though results for dimensions D1, D3 active, and D3 inactive were good or very good, results for dimensions D2 and D4 were poor. In the case of D2, a two-item dimension regarding sedentary habits asking about the total level of sedentariness in one question and about the level of sedentariness during leisure time in the other may have conditioned internal consistency. Similarly, the questions in D4 (family-life balance for LTPA participation) are addressed to two different aspects (partner and family), which may have led to lower internal consistency.
4.2. Dimension 1. Level of LTPA
PA has numerous health benefits and can contribute to prevent several diseases [
61,
62,
63]. Among women, it has been found to aid in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, colon and breast cancer, and fatigue reduction, among others [
64,
65,
66]. In the present study, active women not only performed more LTPA than inactive women overall, but they also performed more LTPA regardless of the intensity. Consistent with general PA levels among women [
17], almost one-third of the participants did not reach the minimum recommendations for total PA, and LTPA participation of inactive women at low, moderate, and vigorous intensities was very low. Although more than two-thirds of the participants considered themselves active, average moderate-intensity PA practice was less than 150 min per week. In addition, the average time dedicated to vigorous-intensity PA was only slightly more than recommended (between 75 and 150 min) among active women. Due to its countless benefits, it seems necessary to encourage PA among all women [
67] by promoting policies that support active life through the collaboration of different institutions and agents [
68].
4.3. Dimension 2. Sedentary Habits
Like physical inactivity, sedentary habits increase the risk of mortality, especially when adults sit for more than seven hours per day. Both are factors in the development of diseases such as colon and breast cancer, diabetes, and coronary heart disease [
69,
70]. Almost half of the participants in both the active and inactive groups sat for over six hours per day on average, which is consistent with the results obtained by Strain et al. [
71]. In terms of sedentary behaviours during leisure time, most participants in both groups spent less than two hours per day watching TV, using the computer, reading, or doing similar activities. However, Prince et al. [
72] found that women aged 18–65 spent approximately three hours per day doing these types of activities. Policies aimed at reducing sedentary behaviour and increasing LTPA are needed, as they contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular disease and premature mortality [
73], among other benefits.
4.4. Dimension 3. Active Women and Motives for and Types of LTPA
Understanding both the type of LTPA and the reasons that motivate it is useful to adapt public PA promotion policies and programmes to the needs of the population. Active women in this study engaged in LTPA to be fit, to prevent or improve health issues, to improve mood, to lose or maintain weight, or to simply enjoy exercise for entertainment. This partially matches the results obtained by Larsen et al. [
74], where improving fitness was found to be the most important reason, followed by enjoyment and improving sports performance. Furthermore, several studies have found that women tend to engage in PA motivated by aspects related to physical appearance, physical and psychological well-being, and self-esteem [
75]. Engaging in PA mainly for appearance and body weight control issues, however, may lead to body image dissatisfaction, unhealthy eating habits, or low self-esteem [
76]. Therefore, although PA may help to improve body image in some cases, it is important to focus on the physical and psychological health benefits and the pleasure it brings [
77].
The type of LTPA that was mostly performed by the active women in this study were non-competitive individual and/or outdoor activities. Frequency was mostly three or more times per week either alone or with family and friends. Although team sports offer an opportunity for socialisation and an enjoyable environment [
78], many women do not find competitive PA attractive and prefer to focus on the social, physical, and psychological benefits [
79,
80]. Many programmes have been conducted to promote PA among women by using a variety of activities, with positive results [
81,
82,
83,
84]. Therefore, although activity type may influence participation, it is important to also consider factors such as intensity, frequency, or the physical and social environment where it takes place.
4.5. Dimension 3. Inactive Women and Barriers to LTPA and Intention to Change
A better understanding of the motives for why inactive people struggles to comply with PA recommendations could help develop strategies and resources to overcome these barriers. In this study, lack of time was the main motive why inactive women quit or did not practice enough LTPA. Laziness, tiredness due to work or studies, excessive workload, prioritising time spent with the family, and family responsibilities were other reasons for not being physically active. According to some studies, lack of time limits LTPA participation and is also closely linked to work requirements, family and home-related care work, and resulting tiredness [
85,
86]. Gender differences in leisure quality are smaller in countries with more egalitarian role expectations, institutionalised egalitarian norms regarding caregiving, and greater political power for women [
23]. In turn, the greater the equality between women and men, the more LTPA women engage in [
87]. Therefore, it may be necessary to establish policies aimed at reducing gender inequalities in this area, too, since LTPA participation is affected by a combination of factors.
Furthermore, despite that over a quarter of inactive women stated that they did not engage in any activity or had done it for less than two years before giving it up, most of them were interested in and willing to restart LTPA. Additionally, and according to Glanz et al. [
88] and Hayotte et al. [
89], it is important to identify the life-stage each person is at in regard to their intention to engage in LTPA so as to implement individually tailored strategies.
4.6. Dimension 3. Participation in Women-Only Programmes (Inactive and Active Groups)
Most of the participants (both active and inactive) had not participated in any women-only PA programmes. This type of schemes can be particularly effective, as they not only yield physical and psychological benefits but provide a safe and supportive space for women to engage in an activity with each other [
90,
91]. However, other studies have found that despite the implementation of PA promotion campaigns at the national level, difficulties in adapting to each environment may hinder implementation at the local level [
92]. Developing programmes based on participants’ needs and their environment favours their implementation and success [
38].
4.7. Dimension 4. Family-Life Balance for LTPA Participation
Many women often take on caregiving responsibilities and lack time for LTPA [
82,
93]. Particularly, women with children under 6 years of age are more likely to be inactive due to the time-consuming nature of childcare tasks, resulting in little time for personal leisure activities [
94,
95]. In line with the aforementioned studies, more than two-thirds of the inactive women in the current study were mothers or were in charge of a child. Having the support of partners, family, or friends can help with work-life balance and being able to devote time to LTPA [
96,
97]. Women in the active group reported higher family and spousal support to participate in LTPA, which indicates that having a support network might help to increase the level of LTPA and maintain it over time.
However, other studies [
98,
99,
100] have found that some mothers who left their children in someone else’s care felt guilty and even selfish. At the same time, however, they felt that LTPA participation was positive both for themselves and for their family, as not only did they set an example, but they transferred the happiness and enjoyment generated through LTPA to the rest of the family [
98,
99,
100]. For this reason, LTPA-encouraging policies should focus on improving work-family balance, encouraging partners and family/friends to support women in LTPA practice, and aiming to reduce any negative care-related feelings of guilt and neglect.
5. Conclusions
Based on the results of this study, the GWPAQ has proven a valid instrument for the assessment of LTPA among adult women of Gipuzkoa. This questionnaire somewhat meets the need to create ad hoc tools aimed exclusively at the study of women’s LTPA. On the other hand, it appears that one-third of the women in Gipuzkoa are inactive, and the difference in the time dedicated to LTPA between inactive and active women is statistically significant. Likewise, a large proportion of active and inactive women spend more than seven hours per day sitting down. This illustrates the need to increase time devoted to LTPA not only for the physical, psychological, and social benefits it entails but also to minimise the harmful effects of sedentary habits. Additionally, several barriers to LTPA were identified. Therefore, to make LTPA promotion effective, it is important to address the many needs and interests of women and to factor in their reality and physical and socio-cultural environments. Lastly, the results obtained in this study regarding work-life balance seem to show that family and partner support may be key when it comes to LTPA, and it is therefore advisable to develop policies that favour the management of women’s personal, family, and working lives.