Next Article in Journal
Minority Identity, Othering-Based Stress, and Sexual Violence
Previous Article in Journal
Weekday and Weekend Differences in Eating Habits, Physical Activity and Screen Time Behavior among a Sample of Primary School Children: The “Seven Days for My Health” Project
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Variability in Healthcare Expenditure According to the Stratification of Adjusted Morbidity Groups in the Canary Islands (Spain)

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(7), 4219; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074219
by Maria Consuelo Company-Sancho 1,2,*, Víctor M. González-Chordá 3 and María Isabel Orts-Cortés 2,4,5
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(7), 4219; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074219
Submission received: 5 March 2022 / Revised: 29 March 2022 / Accepted: 30 March 2022 / Published: 1 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Health Economics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors, 

Please find attached the review report.

Best regards,

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear author,

  • why do the authors present the years 2017 and 2018 in the study? please justify your choice,
  • Aren't two years a short period to compare and draw conclusions?
  • I recommend finalizing the conclusion of the article
  • references not processed according to journal instructions, edit.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper is focused on healthcare costs model, developing an interesting
integrated approach.
The approach is well explained and the example allows readers to understand the whole problem, and also to replicate it.
Despite the paper is well presented and structured, I suggest introducing the main results in the abstract in brief, so that it is possible to have an idea about the overall ones.
Moreover, the introduction, in the presented form, is quite negligible. I suggest restructuring it explaining in-depth the problem.
The English form has to be revised for the presence of some typos. The literature review appears not completely updated.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop