Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Protective Gloves on Manual Dexterity in Cold Environments—A Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Treated Wastewater Irrigation on the Metabolism of Barley Grown in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions
Previous Article in Journal
Through the Second Wave: Analysis of the Psychological and Perceptive Changes in the Italian Population during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mild Hydrothermal Synthesis of 11Å-TA from Alumina Extracted Coal Fly Ash and Its Application in Water Adsorption of Heavy Metal Ions (Cu(II) and Pb(II))
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

From Conventional Disinfection to Antibiotic Resistance Control—Status of the Use of Chlorine and UV Irradiation during Wastewater Treatment

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(3), 1636; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031636
by Muhammad Umar
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(3), 1636; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031636
Submission received: 13 December 2021 / Revised: 22 January 2022 / Accepted: 29 January 2022 / Published: 31 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Second Edition of Municipal Wastewater Treatment)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Only a minor detail, despite the fact that the article is well structured, I suggest to the author to use more diagrams/figures if not, improve the quality of the existing ones.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for taking time and providing highly valuable feedback. Our responses to reviewer’s comments are highlighted in blue in the response file. The changes made in the revised marked manuscript file are also highlighted in blue.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript describes the use of different disinfection techniques applied in wastewater treatment plants for the removal of ARB and ARG. Although this is a very relevant topic, being in the top 10 list of the WHO, the manuscript itself is at times confusing and difficult to read. Therefore, prior to publication the author should revise the manuscript and arrange it in a more readable format. The author also states that hydrogen peroxide is extensively used in wastewater treatment plants. To the best of my knowledge, this technique is not extensively used and if so, this sentence requires references. Additionally, the figures need some explanation as the legends or the text says very little about them, the author adds abbreviations without writing them in full first (please check this) and throughout the text, several typos exist (check for instance, concentration).

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for taking time and providing highly valuable feedback. Our responses to reviewer’s comments are highlighted in blue in the response file. The changes made in the revised marked manuscript file are also highlighted in blue.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The work is a review of 63 literature items. The topic of work is important to human health and the environment.

Wastewater reuse has traditionally been considered safe after treatment by a combi-nation of physicochemical and biological treatments.  However, microbial inactivation alone is not sufficient for ensuring safety of treated wastewater since genes may still be present, even after dis-infection. Importantly, the current disinfection processes are not designed to damage genes which make antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) a serious concern since they enable micro-organisms to become resistant to antibiotics.

Municipal wastewater is regarded as one of the main sources of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and ARGs in aquatic environment. That is why the work on this topic are very important and should be of great interest to the readers.

 

The research is interesting and original, the work is written correctly, the text is clear and easy to read, the layout is logical and the conclusions are correct. There is no unnecessary self-citation at work.  The work can be published

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for taking time and providing highly valuable feedback. Our responses to reviewer’s comments are highlighted in blue in the response file. The changes made in the revised marked manuscript file are also highlighted in blue.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop