Next Article in Journal
Automatic Markerless Motion Detector Method against Traditional Digitisation for 3-Dimensional Movement Kinematic Analysis of Ball Kicking in Soccer Field Context
Next Article in Special Issue
Effectiveness of a Tailored Fall-Prevention Program for Discharged Older Patients: A Multicenter, Preliminary, Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Kovács, K.; Kovács, K.E. Using the Behavioural Regulation in an Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ–2) in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence of Reliability, Sociocultural Background, and the Effect on Sports Activity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11834
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Ai-Chi Practice on Balance and Left Cerebellar Activation during High Working Memory Load Task in Older People: A Controlled Pilot Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 3
10.3390/ijerph19031171
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Body Composition on Gait Variability Varies with Age: Interaction by Hierarchical Moderated Regression Analysis

by
Yungon Lee
1,2,3 and
Sunghoon Shin
1,2,3,*
1
Research Institute of Human Ecology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Korea
2
Neuromuscular Control Laboratory, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Korea
3
School of Kinesiology, College of Human Ecology & Kinesiology, Yeungnam University, 221ho, 280 Daehak-ro, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(3), 1171; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031171
Submission received: 2 December 2021 / Revised: 14 January 2022 / Accepted: 18 January 2022 / Published: 21 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Movement Disorders and Falls in Older Persons)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Although body composition has been found to affect various motor functions (e.g., locomotion and balance), there is limited information on the effect of the interaction between body composition and age on gait variability. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of body composition on gait according to age. A total of 80 men (40 young and 40 older males) participated in the experiment. Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and gait parameters were measured with seven-dimensional inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors as each participant walked for 6 min at their preferred pace. Hierarchical moderated regression analysis, including height as a control variable and age as a moderator variable, was performed to determine whether body composition could predict gait parameters. In young males, stride length decreased as body fat percentage (BFP) increased (R2 = 13.4%), and in older males, stride length decreased more markedly as BFP increased (R2 = 26.3%). However, the stride length coefficient of variation (CV) of the older males increased significantly as BFP increased (R2 = 16.2%), but the stride length CV of young males did not change even when BFP increased. The increase in BFP was a factor that simultaneously caused a decrease in gait performance and an increase in gait instability in older males. Therefore, BFP is more important for a stable gait in older males.

1. Introduction

Human locomotion is a complex process caused by interactions of the neuromuscular system [1]. Human gait is affected by changes in the central nervous system (CNS), sensory-motor system control, or body composition [2,3,4,5]. In general, evidence from basic, clinical, and epidemiological studies points to aging-induced CNS degradation as an important contributor to mobility limitation in older persons without overt neurological disease [3]. In addition, sensory signals in the sensory-motor system compensate for the deteriorated walking performance of older persons by strengthening the transmission of gait commands [6]. In contrast, changes in body composition, such as body fat and muscle mass, deteriorate gait performance [7,8,9,10]. For example, compared to healthy controls, young adults with a higher body mass index (BMI) showed an increase in stance phase duration (2.9%) and double support time (18.2%) [11], and middle-aged men with high body fat showed a decrease in stride length (9.5%) [12]. In addition, the stride length while walking decreased in older persons with low leg muscle mass [8], and as the leg muscle mass decreased, the maximum heel clearance (40%) in young adults decreased [10].
In general, changes in gait with neurological aging, which exist in older persons without specific neurological diseases, are considered part of a natural aging process [13]. For example, healthy older individuals generally walk with a shorter step length and wider step width than healthy adults [14]. In healthy older individuals, body fat is a potential physical factor that can change the gait mechanism. For example, a previous study reported that the higher the BMI, the lower the joint power at the ankle in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction and the higher the joint power at the hip in the medio-lateral (ML) direction at the preferred walking speed [15]. As an increased force in the AP direction in gait mainly induces an efficient gait, an unnecessary increase in joint power in the ML direction reflects an inefficient gait in obese older persons. In particular, it has been shown that direct joint burden due to increased load can lead to neuromuscular degeneration of the lower extremities (i.e., knee arthritis) in older men [16]. Therefore, given the effects of body composition on gait and the interaction between aging and body composition, the effects of body composition on gait are likely to be even more severe in older persons, who are more sensitive to changes in body composition.
Recently, gait variability has been reported as a relatively stronger predictor of neuromuscular system deterioration or aging than walking performance [17]. Gait variability, known as fluctuations in human movement [18], can be quantified as the standard deviation (SD) or the coefficient of variation (CV) of spatiotemporal gait parameters [19,20]. In general, gait variability increases with age [21]. For example, the step time SD and step length SD linearly increased with age for the older persons between 60 and 86 years of age, regardless of height, weight, and presence of chronic disease [22]. In addition, older persons showed increased stride width SD compared to young adults regardless of walking speed (slow, normal, and fast) [23]. As age-induced gait variability is closely related to mobility restriction or fall risk [24,25,26], finding the factors contributing to gait variability in advance can reduce mobility restriction or fall risk during gait [27]. Therefore, gait variability is an important indicator that must be considered when evaluating the interaction between body composition and age.
It seems that human gait can be considerably changed by the interaction of body composition and age, but the interaction between these two factors was not clear in previous studies. In particular, it is unclear whether gait variability increases or decreases because of the interaction between body composition and age. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of body composition on gait according to age. To confirm the effect of age more clearly, the effect of gender must be excluded. A previous study found that height-controlled gait speed and stride length did not differ solely by gender in young and older adults [28,29]. As a result, this study’s gender was limited to men. Finally, we hypothesized that the effect of body composition on gait varies with age and is expected to have a significant impact on gait variability in older males.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

This study was designed as a cross-sectional study. A total of 80 male subjects participated in the gait experiment and were divided into a young male group (n = 40) and an older male group (n = 40) (Figure 1). Participants were selected from a pool of healthy male adults living in the community. The recruitment method used was a community notice. Participants were chosen based on their ability to walk independently and their willingness to engage in physical activity. Those with a neuromuscular disease who had an artificial joint or metal device inserted were excluded. A random sampling method was used to select participants. Young men ranged in age from 20 to 30 years [30], while older men ranged in age from 55 to 85 years [31,32,33,34,35]. Due to time constraints, two young men who did not receive their assigned intervention were dropped out. One older man was unable to participate due to back pain. In addition, one older man dropped out of the experiment due to dizziness while walking, but no side effects were reported by any of the subjects after the study was completed. Their specific physical characteristics are presented in Table 1. This study was conducted in a university indoor gymnasium. After their body composition was evaluated, all of the participants participated in the gait experiment. The participants signed an informed consent form prior to participating in the experiment. This study was approved by a Bioethics Committee (IRB-2018-09-003-002).

2.2. Body Composition

Body composition was measured using an InBody 520 (Biospace Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea). The InBody 520 estimates the body composition of the human body based on bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The bioelectrical resistance method is useful in body composition research because the electrode in contact with the human body measures the resistance value (impedance) of the body through electrical current [36]. It, therefore, allows for easy and non-invasive measurement of body composition [37,38]. The participants climbed on the InBody, faced the front, and stood in an upright position for approximately 60 s. Finally, the body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage (BFP), and skeletal muscle mass (SMM) were determined from the results of the body composition analysis.

2.3. Gait

Gait was measured using a seven-dimensional (three-dimensional accelerometer + three-dimensional gyroscope + one-dimensional barometer) inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors (Physilog5®, GaitUp™, Lausanne, Switzerland). The study participants walked a straight course in the gym at their preferred speed for 6 min with 7-axis IMU sensors attached to the instep of both feet in a vertical direction. After 6 min, gait kinematic data were collected from the IMU sensor, and average gait speed, stride time, and stride length were obtained. Furthermore, gait variability parameters, which were indexed by the coefficient of variation (CV) of gait variables obtained, were calculated as (standard deviation/mean) × 100.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

First, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test of normality was performed, and the physical characteristics, body composition, and gait of the young and older male groups were compared using the independent sample t-test and Mann–Whitney test. The reason for conducting the t-test and Mann-Whitney test in advance was to extract the potential influencing factors on the gait. VIF (variance inflation factor) was accessed for independent variables. All data were converted to Z-values (normalized) before being entered into the regression model. Hierarchical moderated regression analysis was performed to determine whether body composition can predict the performance and variability of spatiotemporal gait variables. In this case, height and age were considered as the control variable and moderator variable, respectively. First, in Model 1 of the hierarchical moderated regression analysis, the independent variables (BFP and SMM) and the control variable (height) were input. Subsequently, in Model 2, the moderator variable (age) was included. Then, in Model 3, the interaction variables (BFP and SMM × age) were added. Finally, if there was an interaction effect (i.e., a significant moderating effect) from Model 3, the young and older male groups were separated, and each linear regression analysis was performed and presented as a graph (Figure 2). The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05, and SPSS 23 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The sample size for the multiple regression analysis was calculated using G * power 3.1.9.4 software (Heinrich Heine Düsseldorf University, Düsseldorf, Germany) set to a significance level (α) = 0.05, power (1 − β) = 0.80, and medium effect size (f2) = 0.15. Therefore, the optimal sample size required was estimated to be 77 persons. In the regression model, the effect size was calculated as Cohen’s f2, and the f2 values were categorized as small (0.02–0.14), medium (0.15–0.34), and large (≥0.35) sizes [39].

3. Results

3.1. Independent Sample T-Test and Mann–Whitney Test

The results of these tests are presented in Table 1. Demographic information revealed significant differences in age, height, and weight between young and older males (p < 0.05). In addition, there was a significant difference in BFP and SMM between young and older males in terms of body composition (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in gait speed, stride time, stride length, stride time CV, and stride length CV between young and older males.

3.2. Hierarchical Moderated Regression Analysis

Table 2 shows the results of the hierarchical moderated regression analysis used to predict stride length. The predictor variable affecting stride length in Model 1 was BFP (R2 = 0.185; p < 0.01; f2 = 0.22), and the predictor variable affecting stride length in Model 2 was also BFP (R2 = 0.197; p < 0.01; f2 = 0.25). In Model 3, the predictors affecting stride length were BFP and the interaction variable (BFP × age) (R2 = 0.268; p < 0.01; f2 = 0.37). The results of the interaction effects are presented in Figure 2A. In the young male group, the stride length was significantly shorter as the BFP increased (R2 = 0.134; p < 0.05; f2 = 0.15), and in the older male group, the stride length was significantly smaller as the BFP increased (R2 = 0.263; p < 0.01; f2 = 0.36). However, none of the predictors of body composition affected the stride time.
Table 3 shows the results of the hierarchical moderated regression analysis for predicting the stride length CV. In Model 1, there were no predictors affecting stride length CV, but in Model 2, the predictors affecting stride length CV were BFP and SMM (R2 = 0.125; p < 0.05; f2 = 0.14). In Model 3, the predictors affecting stride length CV were BFP, SMM, and age, and the interaction variable (BFP × age) (R2 = 0.202; p < 0.01; f2 = 0.25). The results of the interaction effect are shown in Figure 2B. In the older male group, the stride length CV increased significantly as the BFP increased (R2 = 0.162; p < 0.01; f2 = 0.19), but there was no significant change in the stride length CV in the young male group. However, none of the predictors of body composition affected the stride time CV.

4. Discussion

This study aimed to confirm the relationship between body composition measured by the BIA and the kinematic gait variables measured by the IMU sensor during 6-min ground walking in young and older males. Specifically, the purpose of this study was to investigate how the effect of body composition on gait varies with age, which is a moderator variable. We hypothesized that the effect of body composition on gait variability would differ according to age. The results of this study can be summarized as follows.
First, there was a tendency for stride length to decrease as BFP increased, regardless of age, but the effect was significantly greater in the older males group. In the regression analysis, the explanatory power of BFP for stride length in young males was 13.4%, and the explanatory power of BFP for stride length in older males was 26.3% (Figure 2A). Some of the causes of the interaction between BFP and age have been considered in previous studies. For example, although BMI and BFP are the same for young and older adults, obesity sites tend to differ according to age [40], resulting in different gait mechanisms. Obesity in older persons mainly consists of abdominal obesity (i.e., the state of accumulation of visceral fat) [40], and abdominal obesity in the older persons is particularly detrimental to physiological changes (decreased metabolism, increased inflammation, and hormonal imbalance), resulting in senescence syndrome (frailty syndrome) or sarcopenia [41,42]. These diseases tend to cause a decline in lower extremity muscle strength [43,44], and it is possible that this obesity-induced decline in lower extremity muscle strength in older persons significantly reduces the stride length in gait. In addition, it is possible that the direct joint burden caused by weight gain in the older persons changes the biomechanical characteristics of gait. The increase in the range of rotation in the hip in the ML direction and the decrease in the peak joint moment in the ankle in the AP direction during walking in obese older persons fundamentally impede forward walking [15], resulting in a decrease in stride length. In addition, the gait strategy for preventing falls due to obesity in the two age groups may be different [45]. Although young adults adopt an active and bold gait strategy despite weight gain [10], obese older persons exhibit a passive gait pattern that significantly reduces speed, widens stride width, and slightly lengthens stance duration [15,46]. This passive gait of obese older individuals is considered an effort to secure stability from the risk of falling by reducing the stride length. These findings are similar to those of previous studies that obese older individuals exhibit reduced stride length [45,46,47,48], suggesting that gait changes due to obesity may vary according to age. Hence, an increase in BFP appears to decrease the stride length of the older males more than that of relatively young males.
Second, this study showed that the effects of BFP on gait variability in young and older males are different. The increase in BFP increased the stride length CV in the older males but did not affect the stride length CV in young males. In other words, in the regression analysis, the explanatory power of BFP for the stride length CV of young males was 0.1%, but the explanatory power of BFP for the stride length CV of the older males was 16.2% (Figure 2B). There are several possible reasons for these findings. In general, an increase in BFP in the older persons increases the body fat mass of the lower extremities while decreasing the muscle mass of the lower extremities [49]. This reduction in muscle strength is known to increase motor variability as it is associated with fewer motor units and higher firing rates [50,51]. Therefore, a decrease in lower extremity muscle strength due to an increase in BFP in the older persons may have increased the stride length CV [52]. In addition, an increase in body fat mass in older persons tends to worsen cognitive function [53]. This cognitive decline is due to decreased cognitive processing speed and attention [54,55]. In particular, a decrease in cognitive processing speed disrupts the regular pattern of gait control related to the CNS [56], and attention segmentation has been reported to significantly deteriorate accommodative ability in gait timing [57]. Although this study did not evaluate the cognitive function of the older persons, it is possible that the cognitive decline due to the increase in BFP in older persons increased the stride length CV. In addition, the physical pressure of the joint due to weight-bearing can sometimes damage the surrounding tissues [58], and this lowering of proprioception in the older persons can impact the position or movement of the lower extremities in contact with the ground during locomotion [59]. Therefore, the decline in proprioception in older persons can be considered a contributing factor to the increase in stride length CV. The findings of this study were similar to those of a previous study, in which the step length variability increased as the BMI of the older persons increased [60], suggesting that the effect of BFP on gait variability differs according to age. Hence, an increase in BFP appears to significantly increase the stride length CV only in older males.
Finally, this study found that body composition had no relationship with stride time or stride time CV. That is, increasing BFP decreased stride length, a spatial parameter of both young and old men, and increased stride length CV in older men, but it had no effect on the temporal parameters, stride time, and stride time CV. According to the findings of previous studies, regardless of age, the stride parameter has a more significant correlation with the obesity factor in the spatial variable than in the temporal variable [11,12,15,46,47,48].

5. Study Limitations

This study has strengths and limitations. We consider it a strength that gait was assessed during 6 min natural walking not short length walking in the lab which could be close to real walking. However, we did not measure angular kinematic and kinetic data, so there were limitations to interpreting the results from multi-joint mechanisms during gait. The subjects in this study were all males. Gender was not taken into account. It was possible to reduce the gender deviation, but there could be differences in the results by gender. Thus there is a limit to generalizing the conclusion.

6. Conclusions

The effect of BFP on stride length CV differed significantly by age in this study. Stride length CV increased significantly with increasing BFP in older men, but there was no change in stride length CV with increasing BFP in younger men. BFP does not determine time parameters, which are typically expressed as stride mean and CV. This means that an increase in BFP reduced young men’s walking ability slightly but had no effect on gait stability. However, in older men, this resulted in both poor gait performance and gait instability. This does not imply changes in coordinate patterns that structurally alter stride time variability, which is an important feature of locomotion. Our findings support the effect of mechanical BFP impairment on gait regularity in the older persons, as evidenced by a BFP-dependent increase in spatial gait variability in obese older persons, despite the fact that obesity does not cause fundamental changes in temporal coordination patterns. In conclusion, although it has no effect on temporal modulation during gait, managing BFP, a body composition index, is more important in older men than in younger men for stable gait.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; formal analysis, Y.L.; investigation, Y.L.; methodology, S.S. and Y.L.; software, S.S. and Y.L.; validation, S.S. and Y.L.; visualization, S.S. and Y.L.; resources, S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S. and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, S.S. and Y.L.; supervision, S.S.; project administration, S.S.; funding acquisition, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2021R1A6A1A03040177).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Yeungnam University (IRB-2018-09-003-002).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Brantley, J.A.; Luu, T.P.; Nakagome, S.; Zhu, F.; Contreras-Vidal, J.L. Full body mobile brain-body imaging data during unconstrained locomotion on stairs, ramps, and level ground. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 180133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Monfort, S.M.; Pan, X.; Loprinzi, C.L.; Lustberg, M.B.; Chaudhari, A.M. Exploring the roles of central and peripheral nervous system function in gait stability: Preliminary insights from cancer survivors. Gait Posture 2019, 71, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rosso, A.L.; Studenski, S.A.; Chen, W.G.; Aizenstein, H.J.; Alexander, N.B.; Bennett, D.A.; Black, S.E.; Camicioli, R.; Carlson, M.C.; Ferrucci, L. Aging, the central nervous system, and mobility. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med. Sci. 2013, 68, 1379–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Valentine, R.J.; Misic, M.M.; Rosengren, K.S.; Woods, J.A.; Evans, E.M. Sex impacts the relation between body composition and physical function in older adults. Menopause 2009, 16, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sweeney, D.; Quinlan, L.R.; Browne, P.; Richardson, M.; Meskell, P.; ÓLaighin, G. A technological review of wearable cueing devices addressing freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Sensors 2019, 19, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ghai, S.; Ghai, I.; Effenberg, A.O. Effect of rhythmic auditory cueing on aging gait: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Dis. 2018, 9, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. de Souza, S.A.F.; Faintuch, J.; Valezi, A.C.; Sant’Anna, A.F.; Gama-Rodrigues, J.J.; de Batista Fonseca, I.C.; Souza, R.B.; Senhorini, R.C. Gait cinematic analysis in morbidly obese patients. Obes. Surg. 2005, 15, 1238–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Muehlbauer, T.; Granacher, U.; Borde, R.; Hortobagyi, T. Non-discriminant relationships between leg muscle strength, mass and gait performance in healthy young and old adults. Gerontology 2018, 64, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Volpato, S.; Bianchi, L.; Lauretani, F.; Lauretani, F.; Bandinelli, S.; Guralnik, J.M.; Zuliani, G.; Ferrucci, L. Role of muscle mass and muscle quality in the association between diabetes and gait speed. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 1672–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lee, Y.; Shin, S. Effect of body composition on gait performance and variability of 20 year young adults: A preliminary study. J. Korean Soc. Study Phys. Educ. 2018, 23, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lai, P.P.; Leung, A.K.; Li, A.N.; Zhang, M. Three-dimensional gait analysis of obese adults. Clin. Biomech. 2008, 23, S2–S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Choi, H.; Lim, J.; Lee, S. Body fat-related differences in gait parameters and physical fitness level in weight-matched male adults. Clin. Biomech. 2021, 81, 105243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Herssens, N.; Verbecque, E.; Hallemans, A.; Vereeck, L.; Van Rompaey, V.; Saeys, W. Do spatiotemporal parameters and gait variability differ across the lifespan of healthy adults? A systematic review. Gait Posture 2018, 64, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aboutorabi, A.; Arazpour, M.; Bahramizadeh, M.; Hutchins, S.W.; Fadayevatan, R. The effect of aging on gait parameters in able-bodied older subjects: A literature review. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2016, 28, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ko, S.-u.; Stenholm, S.; Ferrucci, L. Characteristic gait patterns in older adults with obesity—Results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J. Biomech. 2010, 43, 1104–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Michalakis, K.; Goulis, D.; Vazaiou, A.; Mintziori, G.; Polymeris, A.; Abrahamian-Michalakis, A. Obesity in the ageing man. Metabolism 2013, 62, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hausdorff, J.M. Gait variability: Methods, modeling and meaning. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2005, 2, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Socie, M.J.; Sosnoff, J.J. Gait variability and multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Int. 2013, 2013, 645197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Brach, J.S.; Berlin, J.E.; VanSwearingen, J.M.; Newman, A.B.; Studenski, S.A. Too much or too little step width variability is associated with a fall history in older persons who walk at or near normal gait speed. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2005, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Brach, J.S.; Perera, S.; Studenski, S.; Katz, M.; Hall, C.; Verghese, J. Meaningful change in measures of gait variability in older adults. Gait Posture 2010, 31, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kyvelidou, A.; Kurz, M.J.; Ehlers, J.L.; Stergiou, N. Aging and partial body weight support affects gait variability. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2008, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Callisaya, M.L.; Blizzard, L.; Schmidt, M.D.; McGinley, J.L.; Srikanth, V.K. Ageing and gait variability—A population-based study of older people. Age Ageing 2010, 39, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Grabiner, P.C.; Biswas, S.T.; Grabiner, M.D. Age-related changes in spatial and temporal gait variables. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2001, 82, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maki, B.E. Gait changes in older adults: Predictors of falls or indicators of fear? J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1997, 45, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rosano, C.; Brach, J.; Studenski, S.; Longstreth Jr, W.; Newman, A.B. Gait variability is associated with subclinical brain vascular abnormalities in high-functioning older adults. Neuroepidemiology 2007, 29, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Brach, J.S.; Studenski, S.A.; Perera, S.; VanSwearingen, J.M.; Newman, A.B. Gait variability and the risk of incident mobility disability in community-dwelling older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2007, 62, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Callisaya, M.L.; Blizzard, L.; McGinley, J.L.; Schmidt, M.D.; Srikanth, V.K. Sensorimotor factors affecting gait variability in older people—a population-based study. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med. Sci. 2010, 65, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lee, D.Y.; Seo, S.G.; Kim, E.J.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, K.M.; Choi, I.H. Inter-segmental motions of the foot in healthy adults: Gender difference. J. Orthop. Sci. 2016, 21, 804–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yang Sun, P.; Ji-Won, K.; Yuri, K.; Moon-Seok, K. Effect of age and sex on gait characteristics in the Korean elderly people. Iran. J. Public Health 2018, 47, 666. [Google Scholar]
  30. Han, S.H.; Kim, C.O.; Kim, K.J.; Jeon, J.; Chang, H.; Kim, E.S.; Park, H. Quantitative analysis of the bilateral coordination and gait asymmetry using inertial measurement unit-based gait analysis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Van Ancum, J.M.; Jonkman, N.H.; van Schoor, N.M.; Tressel, E.; Meskers, C.G.; Pijnappels, M.; Maier, A.B. Predictors of metabolic syndrome in community-dwelling older adults. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Stathokostas, L.; McDonald, M.W.; Little, R.; Paterson, D.H. Flexibility of older adults aged 55–86 years and the influence of physical activity. J. Aging Res. 2013, 2013, 743843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Won, J.; Alfini, A.J.; Weiss, L.R.; Michelson, C.S.; Callow, D.D.; Ranadive, S.M.; Gentili, R.J.; Smith, J.C. Semantic memory activation after acute exercise in healthy older adults. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2019, 25, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Stumme, J.; Jockwitz, C.; Hoffstaedter, F.; Amunts, K.; Caspers, S. Functional network reorganization in older adults: Graph-theoretical analyses of age, cognition and sex. NeuroImage 2020, 214, 116756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. de Zubicaray, G.I.; Rose, S.E.; McMahon, K.L. The structure and connectivity of semantic memory in the healthy older adult brain. Neuroimage 2011, 54, 1488–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Anderson, L.J.; Erceg, D.N.; Schroeder, E.T. Utility of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for assessment of total and regional body composition varies between men and women. Nutr. Res. 2012, 32, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Buckinx, F.; Mouton, A.; Reginster, J.-Y.; Croisier, J.-L.; Dardenne, N.; Beaudart, C.; Nelis, J.; Lambert, E.; Appelboom, G.; Bruyère, O. Relationship between ambulatory physical activity assessed by activity trackers and physical frailty among nursing home residents. Gait Posture 2017, 54, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, L.; Hui, S.S.-C. Validity of four commercial bioelectrical impedance scales in measuring body fat among Chinese children and adolescents. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 614858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  40. Schwartz, R.S.; Shuman, W.P.; Bradbury, V.L.; Cain, K.C.; Fellingham, G.W.; Beard, J.C.; Kahn, S.E.; Stratton, J.R.; Cerqueira, M.D.; Abrass, I.B. Body fat distribution in healthy young and older men. J. Gerontol. 1990, 45, M181–M185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Castillo, C.; Carnicero, J.A.; de la Torre, M.Á.; Amor, S.; Guadalupe-Grau, A.; Rodríguez-Mañas, L.; García-García, F.J. Nonlinear relationship between waist to hip ratio, weight and strength in elders: Is gender the key? Biogerontology 2015, 16, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zamboni, M.; Mazzali, G.; Fantin, F.; Rossi, A.; Di Francesco, V. Sarcopenic obesity: A new category of obesity in the elderly. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2008, 18, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Batista, F.S.; de Oliveira Gomes, G.A.; Neri, A.L.; Guariento, M.E.; Cintra, F.A.; da Luz Rosario de Sousa, M.; D’Elboux, M.J. Relationship between lower-limb muscle strength and frailty among elderly people. Sao Paulo Med. J. 2012, 130, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Menant, J.; Weber, F.; Lo, J.; Sturnieks, D.; Close, J.; Sachdev, P.; Brodaty, H.; Lord, S. Strength measures are better than muscle mass measures in predicting health-related outcomes in older people: Time to abandon the term sarcopenia? Osteoporos. Int. 2017, 28, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shin, S. Analysis of the effect of obesity on gait performance and variability in old adults. Korean J. Phys. Educ. 2014, 53, 759–767. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mickle, K.J.; Steele, J.R. Obese older adults suffer foot pain and foot-related functional limitation. Gait Posture 2015, 42, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Messier, S.P.; Ettinger, W.H.; Doyle, T.E.; Morgan, T.; James, M.K.; O’Toole, M.L.; Burns, R. Obesity: Effects on gait in an osteoarthritic population. J. Appl. Biomech. 1996, 12, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gonzalez, M.; Gates, D.H.; Rosenblatt, N.J. The impact of obesity on gait stability in older adults. J. Biomech. 2020, 100, 109585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Koster, A.; Ding, J.; Stenholm, S.; Caserotti, P.; Houston, D.K.; Nicklas, B.J.; You, T.; Lee, J.S.; Visser, M.; Newman, A.B. Does the amount of fat mass predict age-related loss of lean mass, muscle strength, and muscle quality in older adults? J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med. Sci. 2011, 66, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. de C Hamilton, A.F.; Jones, K.E.; Wolpert, D.M. The scaling of motor noise with muscle strength and motor unit number in humans. Exp. Brain Res. 2004, 157, 417–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sosnoff, J.J.; Newell, K.M. Are age-related increases in force variability due to decrements in strength? Exp. Brain Res. 2006, 174, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shin, S.; Valentine, R.J.; Evans, E.M.; Sosnoff, J.J. Lower extremity muscle quality and gait variability in older adults. Age Ageing 2012, 41, 595–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Kanaya, A.M.; Lindquist, K.; Harris, T.B.; Launer, L.; Rosano, C.; Satterfield, S.; Yaffe, K. Total and regional adiposity and cognitive change in older adults: The Health, Aging and Body Composition (ABC) study. Arch. Neurol. 2009, 66, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Salthouse, T.A. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol. Rev. 1996, 103, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Lawson, R.A.; Yarnall, A.J.; Duncan, G.W.; Breen, D.P.; Khoo, T.K.; Williams-Gray, C.H.; Barker, R.A.; Collerton, D.; Taylor, J.-P.; Burn, D.J. Cognitive decline and quality of life in incident Parkinson’s disease: The role of attention. Park. Relat. Disord. 2016, 27, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Hsieh, K.L.; Sun, R.; Sosnoff, J.J. Cognition is associated with gait variability in individuals with multiple sclerosis. J. Neural Transm. 2017, 124, 1503–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sheridan, P.L.; Solomont, J.; Kowall, N.; Hausdorff, J.M. Influence of executive function on locomotor function: Divided attention increases gait variability in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2003, 51, 1633–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Tashani, O.; Astita, R.; Sharp, D.; Johnson, M. Body mass index and distribution of body fat can influence sensory detection and pain sensitivity. Eur. J. Pain 2017, 21, 1186–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Riskowski, J.; Mikesky, A.; Bahamonde, R.E.; Alvey III, T.; Burr, D.B. Proprioception, gait kinematics, and rate of loading during walking: Are they related? J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2005, 5, 379. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Jayakody, O.; Breslin, M.; Srikanth, V.; Callisaya, M. Medical, sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with gait variability: A longitudinal population-based study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijerph 19 01171 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart showing the experimental design of this study.
Figure 1. Flowchart showing the experimental design of this study.
Ijerph 19 01171 g001
Ijerph 19 01171 g002 550
Figure 2. Interaction graphs for hierarchical moderated regression analysis. The association between normalized gait variables ((A): gait performance and (B): gait variability) and normalized BFP according to age (young and older males). The linear regression line for older males is red, and that for young males is green. The black line is the 95% confidence interval of the regression line. BFP: body fat percentage; CV: coefficient of variation.
Figure 2. Interaction graphs for hierarchical moderated regression analysis. The association between normalized gait variables ((A): gait performance and (B): gait variability) and normalized BFP according to age (young and older males). The linear regression line for older males is red, and that for young males is green. The black line is the 95% confidence interval of the regression line. BFP: body fat percentage; CV: coefficient of variation.
Ijerph 19 01171 g002
Table
Table 1. Demographic information of the male participants.
Table 1. Demographic information of the male participants.
CharacteristicsYoung (n = 40)Older (n = 40)Total (n = 80)p-Value
Age (years)22.25 ± 2.2374.05 ± 6.8648.15 ± 26.55<0.001 *
Height (cm)174.94 ± 5.05168.35 ± 5.38171.64 ± 6.15<0.001 *
Weight (kg)73.98 ± 10.5369.23 ± 8.1571.60 ± 9.660.027 *
BMI (kg/m2)23.35 ± 4.0824.55 ± 2.7623.95 ± 3.51NS
BFP (%) 17.06 ± 6.3226.28 ± 5.2521.67 ± 7.41<0.001 *
SMM (kg)34.73 ± 3.6228.02 ± 3.2531.38 ± 4.80<0.001 *
Gait speed (m/s)1.27 ± 0.111.27 ± 0.171.27 ± 0.15NS
Stride time (s)1.06 ± 0.071.03 ± 0.051.05 ± 0.06NS
Stride length (m)1.34 ± 0.081.30 ± 0.171.32 ± 0.13NS
Stride time CV (%)2.18 ± 0.492.37 ± 0.672.27 ± 0.59NS
Stride length CV (%)3.48 ± 0.703.61 ± 1.173.54 ± 0.96NS
Data are mean ± SD. BMI: body mass index; BFP: body fat percentage; SMM: skeletal muscle mass. CV: coefficient of variation. * indicates significant difference (p < 0.05). NS: not significant. The p-values are significant differences between young and older males.
Table
Table 2. Summary of the results of the hierarchical moderated regression analysis for predicting stride length mean (m).
Table 2. Summary of the results of the hierarchical moderated regression analysis for predicting stride length mean (m).
PredictorsTotal (n = 80)
Model 1Model 2Model 3
βpβpβp
Height (cm)0.231NS0.190NS0.114NS
BFP (%)−0.3970.001 ***−0.4850.001 ***−0.5630.001 ***
SMM (kg)−0.222NS−0.088NS−0.093NS
Age (years) 0.193NS0.216NS
BFP × Age −0.2770.010 **
SMM × Age −0.037NS
R2 block 1 = 0.185ΔR2 = 0.185
R2 block 2 = 0.197ΔR2 = 0.012
R2 block 3 = 0.268ΔR2 = 0.071
BFP: body fat percentage; SMM: skeletal muscle mass. ΔR2: R-square change. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. NS: not significant.
Table
Table 3. Summary of the results of the hierarchical moderated regression analysis for predicting stride length CV (%).
Table 3. Summary of the results of the hierarchical moderated regression analysis for predicting stride length CV (%).
PredictorsTotal (n = 80)
Model 1Model 2Model 3
βpβpβp
Height (cm)0.149NS0.227NS0.305NS
BFP (%)0.171NS0.3360.026 *0.4160.007 **
SMM (kg)−0.284NS−0.5360.022 *−0.5310.019 *
Age (years) −0.363NS−0.3860.036 *
BFP × Age 0.2900.010 **
SMM × Age 0.032NS
R2 block 1 = 0.081ΔR2 = 0.081
R2 block 2 = 0.125ΔR2 = 0.044
R2 block 3 = 0.202ΔR2 = 0.077
BFP: body fat percentage; SMM: skeletal muscle mass. ΔR2: R-square change. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. NS: not significant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, Y.; Shin, S. The Effect of Body Composition on Gait Variability Varies with Age: Interaction by Hierarchical Moderated Regression Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031171

AMA Style

Lee Y, Shin S. The Effect of Body Composition on Gait Variability Varies with Age: Interaction by Hierarchical Moderated Regression Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(3):1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Yungon, and Sunghoon Shin. 2022. "The Effect of Body Composition on Gait Variability Varies with Age: Interaction by Hierarchical Moderated Regression Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 3: 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop