Next Article in Journal
Biomechanics Analysis of the Firefighters’ Thorax Movement on Personal Protective Equipment during Lifting Task Using Inertial Measurement Unit Motion Capture
Next Article in Special Issue
Predictors of Students’ Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impact of Coping Strategies, Sense of Coherence, and Social Support
Previous Article in Journal
Future Perspectives of Ectopic Pregnancy Treatment—Review of Possible Pharmacological Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Cross-Sectional Study to Examine the Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers in Kuwait
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Workplace Wellbeing and Quality of Life Perceived by Portuguese Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Protective Factors and Stressors

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(21), 14231; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114231
by Francisco Sampaio 1,2,*, Ricardo Salgado 3, Matteo Antonini 3, Philippe Delmas 3, Annie Oulevey Bachmann 3, Ingrid Gilles 4 and Claudia Ortoleva Bucher 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(21), 14231; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114231
Submission received: 5 October 2022 / Revised: 24 October 2022 / Accepted: 25 October 2022 / Published: 31 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for inviting me to review the article entitled “Workplace Wellbeing and Quality of Life Perceived by Portuguese Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Protective Factors and Stressors”. This study aims to explore the relationship between factors such as resilience, social or professional support and perceived stress factors or psychosocial risks in the workplace and the quality of life and well-being in the workplace as perceived by Portuguese nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the following, I will make some comments that I hope will be useful to the authors:

 

1.      In the introductory section, the authors should briefly expand and justify the concept of quality of life and professional well-being under the umbrella of a salutogenic model, since these will be the variables addressed as the main outcomes of the study.

2.      To facilitate the reader's understanding in the results section, it should be made clear that the dimensions social support from colleagues, social support from supervisor, and job satisfaction have an inverse interpretation to the others (although the authors already mention this adequately in the methods section).

3.      In the discussion section, and thinking about the implications of the results for the post-pandemic period, it would be good to highlight the comparison of results with studies carried out during the pandemic period and the comparison of results with pre-pandemic studies.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you very much for your relevant recommendations. We are sure they helped improved the overall quality of the paper. You can find attached a point-by-point response to all your comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors, before publication, the manuscript needs to be improved. Details in the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you very much for your relevant recommendations. We are sure they helped improved the overall quality of the paper. You can find attached a point-by-point response to all your comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Accept in present form.

Back to TopTop