Next Article in Journal
An Analysis of the Factors behind Rural Residents’ Satisfaction with Residential Waste Management in Jiangxi, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Climate Anxiety, Loneliness and Perceived Social Isolation
Previous Article in Journal
What Is on Your Gig Radar? Toward a Hierarchical Structure of Coping
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Visual Elements of Tobacco Packaging on Health Risk Perceptions of Youth Groups
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Relationship between Health-Related Fitness and Quality of Life in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

1
School of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China
2
The Third Unit, Department of Hepatology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
3
School of Physical Education, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan 030000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(21), 14215; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114215
Submission received: 16 September 2022 / Revised: 25 October 2022 / Accepted: 26 October 2022 / Published: 31 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Challenges and Crucial Topics for 2030 Public Health)

Abstract

:
Background: It is well known that patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) suffer from impaired quality of life (QoL) and decreased health-related fitness. Studies on the relationship between them have been scarce. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed in 104 NAFLD patients. Liver fat content and fibrosis were assessed using transient elastography. Health-related fitness was measured by fitness test. VO2max was determined by YMCA submaximal cycle ergometer test. Body composition was tested by bioimpedance analysis. QoL was evaluated using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36). Results: Most patients had severe liver steatosis without significant fibrosis. Most of them exhibited poor health-related fitness. Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that body compositions (waist circumference, hip circumference, percent body fat, percent skeletal muscle, visceral fat area) dependently contributed to QoL (health transition, role limitation due to physical problem, general health, physical functioning and vitality). VO2max was positively related with physical functioning. Conclusion: For NAFLD patients, decreased health-related fitness was associated with impaired QoL both in the physical and mental dimension. Our results indicate that visceral fat together with muscle mass and VO2max could serve as individual exercise intervention targets to improve QoL.

1. Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a highly prevalent liver disease affecting about 25% of the adult population worldwide [1]. In addition to the serious outcomes, such as end-stage liver disease and promoting incidence of metabolic trait, NAFLD also decreases the quality of life (QoL) [2]. In our outpatient group, a large proportion of NAFLD patients sought medical advice due to symptoms associated with low QoL.
QoL is a broad ranging concept affected in a complex way by a person’s physical health, psychological state, level of independence, social relationships and their relationship to salient features of their environment [3]. Previous studies have shown that patients with NAFLD suffered a lot from the impaired QoL [4,5,6]. The prominent manifestation is fatigue, which is not paralleled with liver function [7]. The determinants of QoL are complex, including disease and treatment, health care provision or psychological variables [8]. It is well accepted that health-related fitness is closely associated with QoL in the general population [9,10].
Health-related fitness usually includes cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), muscular strength and endurance, body composition and flexibility. It has been reported that patients with NAFLD present reduced CRF and muscular strength [11]. However, whether reduced health-related physical fitness is also a cause of impaired QoL has not been fully studied.
Therefore, we carried out the cross-sectional study to investigate the association between health-related fitness and QoL in NAFLD patients. The results may help to discover the additional cause of low QoL and facilitate development and implementation of specific exercise intervention to improve QoL.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This was a single-center cross-sectional study from October 2021 to September 2022. The guidelines on ‘Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)’ were chosen to guide this study. The study was in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethical Committee of Beijing Youan Hospital (approval number: 2018-095). All patients provided written informed consent form to have their data used (anonymously) for research purposes.

2.2. Participants

NAFLD patients came from the outpatient clinic of Beijing Youan Hospital. Prior to enrolment, eligible patients had a medical screen to exclude uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease or other contraindications to exercise testing as outlined in the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines [12]. The inclusion criteria were: (1) age ≥18 years; (2) fatty liver diagnosed by B-type ultrasound or liver biopsy. The exclusion criteria were: (1) contraindications to exercise testing; (2) significant orthopedic or neuromuscular limitations; (3) unwillingness to participate; (4) alcohol consumption ≥30 g/ day (males) or ≥20 g/day (females); (5) coexisting with other liver diseases, such as hepatitis B and C, autoimmune liver diseases, secondary fatty liver due to specific drugs, etc.; (6) could not complete the physical fitness evaluation. Finally, 124 cases were screened, and 104 patients were included (Figure 1).

2.3. Data Collection

2.3.1. NAFLD Definition and Classification

The presence of fatty liver was assessed by B-type ultrasound. Partial patients were confirmed by liver biopsy. Liver fat content and fibrosis were measured by Fibroscan 502 touch device (Echosens, Paris, France). As to the value of controlled attenuated parameter (CAP), liver steatosis was classified into 3 grades: mild liver steatosis: 238–258 db/m, moderate liver steatosis: 259–292 db/m, severe liver steatosis: >292 db/m. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was used to assess the severity of liver fibrosis.

2.3.2. Assessment of Quality of Life

QoL was assessed using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36), its reliability and validity have been verified on Chinese in mainland China [13]. SF-36 is a multipurpose and short-form health survey, which is commonly used to evaluate patients’ QoL in clinical practice, including NAFLD patients [14,15,16]. A total of eight domains were evaluated in this questionnaire, including physical functioning (PF), role limitation due to physical problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role limitation due to emotional problem (RE) and mental health (MH). Additionally, the eight health domains can be used to provide a physical component summary score (PCS) and a mental component summary score (MCS). In addition to these eight domains, patients’ health transition (HT) will also be investigated. Each domain is scored from 0 to 100, so that the lowest score represents low QoL and vice versa [17].

2.3.3. Assessment of Health-Related Fitness

Muscular strength was tested using grip strength (GS). GS was detected twice by hand grip dynamometer (EH101, CAMRY, Guangdong, China) with the dominant hand. The higher value was recorded as GS [18]. Relative grip strength (RGS) is the ratio of grip strength to BMI [19]. BMI was calculated using the Quetlet’s formula: BMI = Weight (kg)/Height (m)2. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 [20]. The results were evaluated according to the National Physical Fitness Evaluation Standard (2003) [18].
Cardiorespiratory fitness test was carried out using the YMCA power car scheme (YMCA Submaximal Cycle Ergometer Test) [21]. The stable heart rates of study participants were controlled between 110 beats per minute (bpm) and 70% of the heart rate reserve (85% of the age-predicted heart rate) in the continuous tests, and the heart rates at the 45–60 s of the 2nd and 3rd minute were recorded. If the heart rate changed more than 5 bpm, the movement was extended for 1 min at this power. The heart rate and power of 2 points in continuous stages with stable heart rates of 110 bpm or more were selected as a straight line. The extended line of the straight line was used to determine the predicted maximum power corresponding to the age-predicted maximum heart rate, and then the VO2max was calculated according to the standard formula. The results were evaluated according to Leonard A. Kaminsky’s study [22].
Flexibility was assessed using sitting forward flexion (SFF) by sitting on a flexibility measuring instrument (TQQ-IIA, XDHT, Beijing, China) with their heels positioned at the edge of the device. Patients then bent forward at the waist with their hands outstretched in front of them to push the measuring instrument as far as possible past their feet. The better distance of two tests was recorded. The results were evaluated according to the National Physical Fitness Evaluation Standard (2003) [18].
Percent body fat (PBF), skeletal muscle mass and visceral fat area (VFA) were estimated by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody720, InBody, Seoul, Korea). Percent skeletal muscle (PSM) is the ratio of skeletal muscle mass to the total weight.
Waist circumference (WC) is one of the indicators of central obesity [23], and it was measured at the midpoint between the lower rib cage and iliac crest. The hip circumference (HC) was measured at the level of maximum extension of the buttocks while the participant stood upright with the feet held together. WC and HC were measured using a non-stretchable fiberglass tape [24]. The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated as waist circumference divided by hip circumference. Central obesity was defined as waist circumference (≥90 cm for men and ≥80 cm for women) [25].

2.3.4. Assessments and Definitions of Other Variables

Demographic data, past medical history and laboratory data including liver function, fasting blood sugar (FBS) and blood lipid profile were collected. T2DM was diagnosed when: FBS ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, HbA1c ≥ 6.5% or OGTT 2 h blood sugar ≥ 11.1 mmol/L, or taking hypoglycemic drugs [26]. Dyslipidemia was diagnosed when elevated blood lipids met at least one of the following: TC ≥ 6.22 mmol/L, TG ≥ 2.26 mmol/L, LDL-C ≥ 4.14 mmol/L or HDL-C < 1.04 mmol/L or under antihyperlipidemic treatment [27]. Hyperuricemia was defined as serum uric acid above 420.0 µmol/L in males and 360.0 µmol/L in females or use of uric acid lowering drugs [28]. Hypertension was defined as an average systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or average diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg or as the use of antihypertension medication [29].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (v 26.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Normal distribution continuous data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences in variables between genders and grades of liver steatosis were calculated using independent-sample t test. Percentages were used to summarize categorical variables, and data were compared by chi-squared test. Trends and associations between health-related fitness and QoL were evaluated using Pearson’s analysis of correlation. To identify potential predictive factors for QoL, multiple linear regression analyses were performed using a stepwise procedure. All dimensions of QoL were selected and represented as dependent variables. Statistically significant variables of health-related fitness after Pearson correlation were selected as independent variables and were adjusted for sex, age, comorbidity and degree of liver steatosis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Patients

A total of 124 NAFLD patients were screened, and 104 cases were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 37.0 ± 9.7 years. Male patients accounted for 78.8%. Mean BMI was 28.6 ± 3.8 kg/m2. The proportion of severe hepatic steatosis in men and women were 81.7% and 81.8%, respectively (Table 1). Compared with other dimensions of QoL, HT and GT scores are relatively low (Figure 2).

3.2. Characteristics of Health-Related Fitness

VO2max levels were lower than average in 91.5% of males and 80.0% of female NAFLD patients. There were 48.8% of male patients and 50% of female patients with GS lower than grade 3 (medium level). Meanwhile, there were 86.6% of male patients and 59.1% of female patients with SFF lower than grade 3 (medium level). No patient achieved grade 5 of SFF (Table 2).
The dimensions of QoL, including GH, HT, PF, RP, PCS and VT were found to be correlated with indicators of health-related fitness. The correlations were listed in Table 3.
As listed in Table 4, WC, PBF, PSM and VO2max, HC, PSM and VFA contributed significantly to HT, GH, PF, RP, PCS and VT with an adjusted beta of −0.278, −0.337, 0.321 and 0.211, 0.230, 0.215 and −0.200, respectively.

4. Discussion

NAFLD is a highly prevalent liver disease which affects about one quarter of adults worldwide. In addition to the risk of progression to end-stage liver disease, NAFLD can also impact life quality in many ways in the early stage. It has been reported that demographics, clinical parameters and severity of disease were all related to QoL [8]. Few studies have explored the influence of health-related fitness on QoL of NAFLD patients. From our research, we discovered that the majority of patients exhibited low health-related fitness and QoL. PSM, VO2max and HC were positively associated with different physical-related dimensions of QoL; meanwhile, PBF, WC and VFA exhibited negative correlation. VFA was the only indicator that was associated with the mental-related dimension of QoL. These findings deepened our knowledge of the importance of health-related fitness to NAFLD patients and revealed the potential link of exercise intervention with QoL improvement through enhancing health-related fitness.
The study was performed in the outpatient clinic of a hepatology hospital. Most of NAFLD patients came to the clinic due to occurrence or progression of fatty liver disease, elevation of liver enzymes or symptoms such as fatigue, dull pain of right upper abdomen, etc. After medical assessment by a hepatologist, patients were transferred to an exercise physiologist and acquired exercise intervention after physical fitness assessment. Patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. In our cohort, male patients accounted for 78.8% and were much younger than female patients. Obese patients accounted for 84.6%. Most patients had dyslipidemia, while the proportion of T2DM, hypertension and hyperuricemia were relatively low. Most patients had elevated ALT/AST/γ-GT and severe liver steatosis without obvious fibrosis. The manifestations indicated that most of the patients were in the early stage of NAFLD.
In the study, three indicators of health-related fitness were analyzed in detail. VO2max is the gold standard for assessing CRF, which is viewed as the fifth vital sign due to the close relationship with the incidence of cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality, and mortality rates attributable to various cancers [30]. The mean level of VO2max was 31.8 ± 5.9 mL/kg/min, and only three cases (3.0%) were above the average level according to the international standard [22]. The fact of low VO2max in NALFD was also observed in previous studies. In the study by Li Hao et al., the average VO2max was 31.19 ± 4.51 mL/kg/min in 224 male Chinese NAFLD patients, in which VO2max was also determined by YMCA test. In an American study, VO2max was 26.8 ± 7.4 mL/kg/min which included 37 patients in which VO2max was determined by Bruce test [31]. In a UK study, the VO2 peak was determined by Cortex metalyser 3B instrument. The mean VO2max was 34.4 ± 7.3 mL/kg/min lean body mass in male and 29.0 ± 7.6 mL/kg/min lean body mass in female [32]. In those studies, VO2max was significantly lower in NAFLD than in healthy control. Furthermore, we compared VO2max between the two groups of patients with mild to moderate and severe liver steatosis, VO2max was not influenced by severity of steatosis. The result was similar to the American study. In summary, we deduced that NAFLD exhibited worse CRF but not related with the severity of liver steatosis. The mechanism of CRF reduction in NAFLD was not clear. Afolabi’s study indicated that in NAFLD patients, hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction was related to CRF reduction [30].
GS is one of the indicators of muscle mass and strength. In our study, GS lower than grade 3 (medium level) was seen in 48.8% of male and 50% of female NAFLD patients, indicating that muscle mass and strength reduction was very common in NAFLD patients although their age is relatively young. A Korean study also discovered the relationship between GS and QoL in general population [33]. The association between liver and muscle has been fully studied. Skeletal muscle has been regarded as an important endocrine organ for postprandial glucose utilization and secretion of myokines mediating crosstalk between muscle, liver, adipose tissue, and other organs [34]. Sarcopenia has been verified as one of the risk factors of NAFLD development [35]. In a prospective cohort, low GS and muscle mass contributed to development of severe NAFLD [36]. In their study, severe NAFLD was defined as hospitalization or death due to NAFLD. In our study, patients in both groups were young and all at early stage of NAFLD without fibrosis. It’s reasonable that no difference was found between the mild to moderate and severe liver steatosis group.
Flexibility refers to the intrinsic properties of body tissues that determine maximal joint range of motion without causing injury. Studies have found the relationship between cardiometabolic health and SFF [37]. For many years, flexibility has been classified as a major component of physical fitness by many countries [38]. Flexibility determination is also a basis of exercise intervention. In our study, flexibility was evaluated by sitting forward flexion. There were 86.6% of male and 59.1% of female with SFF lower than grade 3. No patient achieved grade 5 of SFF. The results indicated that stretching exercise should also be additional addressed.
The general concept of quality of life was considered a useful adjunct to traditional concepts of health and functional status [39]. Given the accumulating evidence, NAFLD patients experience an impaired QoL, which is significantly lower than the general population [40] and hepatitis C patients [41]. Lower QoL of NAFLD has been verified to be related with elder age, female, low income and educational level, obesity, T2DM, fibrosis and cirrhosis, but not affected by liver enzymes or serum albumin [8]. In our population, the dimensions were also not affected by steatosis severity. The five dimensions, including HT, GH, PF, RP and VT were positively related with PSM, VO2max and HC, while negatively related with WC, PBF and VFA in a dependent way. The results were consistent to a study in an American cohort [40]. They discovered a positive correlation of lean body mass, dry lean mass and skeletal muscle with PF, role limitations due to physical health (equal to RP in the paper), emotional well-being (equal to MH in the paper), emotional problems (equal to RE in the paper) and SF scales. Meanwhile, BMI and body fat mass was proven to be negatively correlated with PF, RP, energy/fatigue (equal to VT in the paper), pain (equal to BP in the paper) and GH scales [40]. In summary of both their research and ours, lower QoL of NAFLD was mainly influenced by increase of fatty issue and decrease of muscle. Interestingly, we found that VFA was an independent factor of VT. As previously reported, lower levels of chronic system inflammation in NAFLD and obesity are the cause of the reduction of VT [42]. The results indicated that for the patients with low VT, intervention aiming to decrease VFA should be emphasized. In addition, we also found that as a marker of aerobic ability, VO2max was an independent factor of PF together with PSM. Altogether, exercise focusing on decreasing visceral fat and increasing VO2max and muscle mass will benefit both the physical and mental dimensions of QoL.
There were also several limitations of our study. First, this is a single center study with small sample size. Second, this study did not include sociodemographic information, such as educational background, smoking habit, physical activity or medical status. Third, the subjects were all in early stage of NAFLD. Hence, there was no chance to fully analyze the relationship between QoL and NAFLD severity. Because of the limitations, our results need to be further verified in the future.

5. Conclusions

In summary, in this study, we show that (1) NAFLD patients’ health-related fitness is poor. (2) Health-related fitness influences quality of life directly, body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness are major risk factors for reduced quality of life. For NAFLD patients with reduced quality of life, exercise interventions should be targeted at reducing visceral fat and increasing muscle mass and VO2max.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.W. and H.R.; methodology, L.W. and H.R.; validation, J.Z. and Y.L.; formal analysis, L.W.; investigation, J.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, L.W.; writing—review and editing, H.R.; supervision, W.Y.; project administration, H.Z.; funding acquisition, L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Capitals’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (No. 2017YB024; 2022-2Z-2187).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Youan Hospital (ethics number: 2018-095).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent form was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request to qualified researchers from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge all the participants for their time and patience. Thank the Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education of Exercise and Physical Fitness of Beijing Sport University for providing the testing equipment. Also thank Lixia Qiu, Xiaofei Du and Zhenhuan Cao for helping recruit patients and Xin Wang for fitness testing and questionnaire investigation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ALPalkaline phosphatase
ALTalanine aminotransferase
ASTaspartate aminotransferase
BMIbody mass index
BPbodily pain
CAPcontinuous attenuation parameter
CRFcardiorespiratory fitness
FBSfast glucose sugar
GHgeneral health
GSgrip strength
HChip circumference
HDL-Chigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol
HThealth transition
LDL-Clow-density lipoprotein cholesterol
LSMliver stiffness measurement
MCSmental component summary score
MHmental health
PBFpercent body fat
PCSphysical component summary score
PFphysical functioning
PSMpercent skeletal muscle mass
RErole limitation due to emotional problem
RGSrelative grip strength
RProle limitation due to physical problems
SFsocial functioning
SFFsitting forward flexion
SF-3636-item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire
TCtotal cholesterol
TGtriglyceride
VFAvisceral fat area
VO2maxmaximal oxygen uptake
VTvitality
WCwaist circumference
WHRwaist-to-hip ratio
γ-GTγ-glutamyl transferase

References

  1. Fan, J.G.; Wei, L.; Zhuang, H.; National Workshop on Fatty Liver and Alcoholic Liver Disease; Chinese Society of Hepatology; Chinese Medical Association; Fatty Liver Disease Expert Committee; Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Cai, W.; Feng Chen, D.; et al. Guidelines of prevention and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (2018, China). J. Dig. Dis. 2019, 20, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. David, K.; Kowdley, K.V.; Unalp, A.; Kanwal, F.; Brunt, E.M.; Schwimmer, J.B.; NASH CRN Research Group. Quality of life in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Baseline data from the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network. Hepatology 2009, 49, 1904–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Flanagan, S.; Damery, S.; Combes, G. The effectiveness of integrated care interventions in improving patient quality of life (QoL) for patients with chronic conditions. An overview of the systematic review evidence. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2017, 15, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Afendy, A.; Kallman, J.B.; Stepanova, M.; Younoszai, Z.; Aquino, R.D.; Bianchi, G.; Marchesini, G.; Younossi, Z.M. Predictors of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009, 30, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, H.J.; Chu, H.; Lee, S. Factors influencing on health-related quality of life in South Korean with chronic liver disease. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2018, 16, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, R.; Fan, J.G.; Shi, J.P.; Mao, Y.M.; Wang, B.Y.; Zhao, J.M.; Lu, L.G.; Zhong, B.H.; Zou, Z.S.; Xu, Y.Q.; et al. Health-related quality of life in Chinese population with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A national multicenter survey. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2021, 19, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Golabi, P.; Otgonsuren, M.; Cable, R.; Felix, S.; Koenig, A.; Sayiner, M.; Younossi, Z.M. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is associated with impairment of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL). Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2016, 14, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ozawa, N.; Sato, K.; Sugimura, A.; Maki, S.; Tanaka, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Ito, T.; Ishizu, Y.; Kuzuya, T.; Honda, T.; et al. Quality of Life in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Structure and related factors focusing on illness uncertainty. Jpn. J. Nurs. Sci. 2021, 18, e12415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ruiz, J.R.; Castro-Pinero, J.; Artero, E.G.; Ortega, F.B.; Sjostrom, M.; Suni, J.; Castillo, M.J. Predictive validity of health-related fitness in youth: A systematic review. Br. J. Sports Med. 2009, 43, 909–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, K.; Vaara, J.P.; Vasankari, T.; Hakkinen, A.; Mantysaari, M.; Kyrolainen, H. Muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness are associated with health-related quality of life among young adult men. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hao, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zeng, Z. Association between Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Relative Grip Strength with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e923015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Exercise Testing and Prescription; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, L.; Wang, H.M.; Shen, Y. Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: Translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalisation. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2003, 57, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Martinez-Urbistondo, D.; San Cristobal, R.; Villares, P.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A.; Babio, N.; Corella, D.; Del Val, J.L.; Ordovas, J.M.; Alonso-Gomez, A.M.; Warnberg, J.; et al. Role of NAFLD on the Health Related QoL Response to Lifestyle in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: The PREDIMED Plus Cohort. Front. Endocrinol. Lausanne 2022, 13, 868795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alrasheed, M.; Guo, J.J.; Lin, A.C.; Wigle, P.R.; Hardee, A.; Hincapie, A.L. The effect of polypharmacy on quality of life in adult patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the United States. Qual. Life Res. 2022, 31, 2481–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kennedy-Martin, T.; Bae, J.P.; Paczkowski, R.; Freeman, E. Health-related quality of life burden of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A robust pragmatic literature review. J. Patient Rep. Outcomes 2017, 2, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ware, J.E., Jr.; Sherbourne, C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care 1992, 30, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. General Administration of Sport of China. Handbook of National Physical Fitness Standards; People’s Sports Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cho, J.; Lee, I.; Park, D.H.; Kwak, H.B.; Min, K. Relationships between Socioeconomic Status, Handgrip Strength, and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Middle-Aged Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eslam, M.; Sarin, S.K.; Wong, V.W.; Fan, J.G.; Kawaguchi, T.; Ahn, S.H.; Zheng, M.H.; Shiha, G.; Yilmaz, Y.; Gani, R.; et al. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Hepatol. Int. 2020, 14, 889–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ofusa, Y.; Golding, L.A. YMCA Fitness Testing and Assessment Manual; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaminsky, L.A.; Arena, R.; Myers, J. Reference Standards for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Measured with Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: Data From the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise National Database. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2015, 90, 1515–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Xue, R.; Li, Q.; Geng, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, F.; Zhang, S. Abdominal obesity and risk of CVD: A dose-response meta-analysis of thirty-one prospective studies. Br. J. Nutr. 2021, 126, 1420–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sharma, M.; Kulkarni, A.; Kumar, P.; Nori, V.B.; Jagtap, N.; Gupta, R.; Reddy, D.N.; Rao, P.N. Difference in lifestyle and metabolic profile of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with raised alanine amino-transferases between obese and non-overweight subjects. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alberti, K.G.; Zimmet, P.; Shaw, J.; Group, I.D.F.E.T.F.C. The metabolic syndrome--a new worldwide definition. Lancet 2005, 366, 1059–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alberti, K.G.; Zimmet, P.Z. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet. Med. 1998, 15, 539–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Joint Committee for Guideline Revision. 2016 Chinese guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia in adults. J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 2018, 15, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fang, J.; Alderman, M.H. Serum uric acid and cardiovascular mortality the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study, 1971–1992. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA 2000, 283, 2404–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. James, P.A.; Oparil, S.; Carter, B.L.; Cushman, W.C.; Dennison-Himmelfarb, C.; Handler, J.; Lackland, D.T.; LeFevre, M.L.; MacKenzie, T.D.; Ogedegbe, O.; et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: Report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA 2014, 311, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ross, R.; Blair, S.N.; Arena, R.; Church, T.S.; Despres, J.P.; Franklin, B.A.; Haskell, W.L.; Kaminsky, L.A.; Levine, B.D.; Lavie, C.J.; et al. Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016, 134, e653–e699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Krasnoff, J.B.; Painter, P.L.; Wallace, J.P.; Bass, N.M.; Merriman, R.B. Health-related fitness and physical activity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2008, 47, 1158–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Afolabi, P.R.; Scorletti, E.; Calder, P.C.; Byrne, C.D. Factors independently associated with cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2020, 40, 2998–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shin, H.S. Association between periodontal status and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a Korean adult population: A nationwide cross-sectional study. J. Periodontol. 2020, 91, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pratesi, A.; Tarantini, F.; Di Bari, M. Skeletal muscle: An endocrine organ. Clin. Cases Miner. Bone Metab. 2013, 10, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kim, G.; Lee, S.E.; Lee, Y.B.; Jun, J.E.; Ahn, J.; Bae, J.C.; Jin, S.M.; Hur, K.Y.; Jee, J.H.; Lee, M.K.; et al. Relationship Between Relative Skeletal Muscle Mass and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A 7-Year Longitudinal Study. Hepatology 2018, 68, 1755–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Petermann-Rocha, F.; Gray, S.R.; Forrest, E.; Welsh, P.; Sattar, N.; Celis-Morales, C.; Ho, F.K.; Pell, J.P. Associations of muscle mass and grip strength with severe NAFLD: A prospective study of 333,295 UK Biobank participants. J. Hepatol. 2022, 76, 1021–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Battista, F.; Ermolao, A.; van Baak, M.A.; Beaulieu, K.; Blundell, J.E.; Busetto, L.; Carraca, E.V.; Encantado, J.; Dicker, D.; Farpour-Lambert, N.; et al. Effect of exercise on cardiometabolic health of adults with overweight or obesity: Focus on blood pressure, insulin resistance, and intrahepatic fat-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 2021, 22 (Suppl. S4), e13269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nuzzo, J.L. The Case for Retiring Flexibility as a Major Component of Physical Fitness. Sports Med. 2020, 50, 853–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. The World Health Organization. Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Soc. Sci. Med. 1998, 46, 1569–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Samala, N.; Desai, A.; Vilar-Gomez, E.; Smith, E.R.; Gawrieh, S.; Kettler, C.D.; Pike, F.; Chalasani, N. Decreased Quality of Life Is Significantly Associated With Body Composition in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 18, 2980–2988.e2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Younossi, Z.M.; Stepanova, M.; Lawitz, E.J.; Reddy, K.R.; Wai-Sun Wong, V.; Mangia, A.; Muir, A.J.; Jacobson, I.; Djedjos, C.S.; Gaggar, A.; et al. Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Experience Severe Impairment of Health-Related Quality of Life. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 114, 1636–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gerber, L.H.; Weinstein, A.A.; Mehta, R.; Younossi, Z.M. Importance of fatigue and its measurement in chronic liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 3669–3683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of patients’ selection.
Figure 1. Flow chart of patients’ selection.
Ijerph 19 14215 g001
Figure 2. Radar chart of QoL scores in different dimensions with NAFLD patients.
Figure 2. Radar chart of QoL scores in different dimensions with NAFLD patients.
Ijerph 19 14215 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of patients with NAFLD.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients with NAFLD.
VariablesAll
(N = 104)
GenderDegree of Liver Steatosis
Male (N = 82)Female (N = 22)Mild to Moderate (N = 19)Severe (N = 85)
Demographic data
Age (years)37.0 ± 9.734.5 ± 7.446.4 ± 11.5 **38.0 ± 11.236.8 ± 9.4
Height (cm)173.4 ± 8.3176.5 ± 6.2162.1 ± 4.5 **172.7 ± 9.2173.6 ± 8.2
Weight (kg)86.1 ± 15.890.4 ± 13.970.3 ± 11.9 **84.8 ± 16.286.4 ± 15.8
BMI (kg/m2)28.6 ± 3.829.1 ± 3.626.7 ± 3.9 **28.2 ± 3.728.6 ± 3.8
Obesity, n (%)88 (84.6%)74 (90.2%)14 (63.6%) **18 (94.7%)70 (82.4%)
Central obesity, n (%)99 (95.2%)79 (96.3%)20 (90.9%)18 (94.7%)81 (95.3%)
Comorbidities
T2DM, n (%)9 (8.7%)7 (8.5%)2 (9.1%)1 (5.30%)8 (9.40%)
Dyslipidemia, n (%)78 (75.0%)62 (75.6%)16 (72.7%)14 (73.70%)64 (75.30%)
Hypertension, n (%)7 (6.7%)4 (4.90%)3 (13.6%)3 (15.80%)4 (4.70%)
Hyperuricemia, n (%)24 (23.1%)23 (28.0%)1 (4.5%) **3 (15.80%)21 (24.70%)
Laboratory data
ALT (U/L)74.5 ± 54.583.4 ± 56.441.5 ± 28.9 **54.3 ± 40.479.1 ± 56.3
AST (U/L)43.0 ± 23.846.1 ± 25.031.4 ± 13.7 **40.2 ± 26.743.6 ± 23.2
γ-GT (U/L)64.2 ± 65.064.1 ± 69.864.3 ± 43.749.7 ± 42.267.4 ± 68.8
ALP (U/L)81.8 ± 20.482.3 ± 20.179.7 ± 22.079.3 ± 17.482.3 ± 21.1
FBS (mmol/L)5.4 ± 0.75.4 ± 0.75.5 ± 0.65.3 ± 0.45.5 ± 0.7
TG (mmol/L)2.2 ± 2.42.3 ± 2.71.6 ± 0.61.6 ± 0.62.3 ± 2.6
TC (mmol/L)5.3 ± 1.15.3 ± 1.25.4 ± 0.95.3 ± 0.85.3 ± 1.2
LDL-C (mmol/L)1.1 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.3
HDL-C (mmol/L)3.4 ± 2.13.4 ± 2.33.3 ± 0.9 **3.2 ± 0.83.4 ± 2.3
Uric acid (μmol/L)425.8 ± 88.5449.8 ± 81.4336.4 ± 47.6 **431.7 ± 87.2424.4 ± 89.3
CAP (dB/m)329.8 ± 37.4331.5 ± 36.9323.7 ± 39.4271.3 ± 16.4342.9 ± 26.5 ##
LSM (kPa)6.4 ± 2.36.5 ± 2.46.0 ± 1.76.3 ± 2.46.4 ± 2.3
Health-related fitness
PBF (%)31.9 ± 5.730.4 ± 4.937.5 ± 5.0 **31.3 ± 4.632.0 ± 5.9
VFA (cm2)124.6 ± 39.0122.5 ± 38.9132.2 ± 39.5116.9 ± 27.3126.3 ± 41.1
PSM (%)38.2 ± 3.639.3 ± 2.934.0 ± 2.8 **38.4 ± 3.138.1 ± 3.7
WC (cm)99.4 ± 10.7101.5 ± 9.591.2 ± 11.3 **97.7 ± 11.299.7 ± 10.7
HC (cm)105.1 ± 7.1106.2 ± 6.6101.2 ± 7.7 **104.6 ± 7.2105.2 ± 7.2
WHR0.9 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.00.9 ± 0.1 **0.9 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.1
VO2max (mL/kg/min)31.8 ± 5.932.1 ± 6.130.7 ± 5.133.3 ± 7.831.4 ± 5.4
RGS1.2 ± 0.51.3 ± 0.50.8 ± 0.3 **1.3 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.5
GS (kg)40.6 ± 10.144.3 ± 7.526.8 ± 5.4 **39.6 ± 11.140.8 ± 9.9
SFF (cm)-2.9 ± 8.7-3.7 ± 8.50.0 ± 9.00.5 ± 8.4−3.7 ± 8.7
Quality of life
HT40.4 ± 27.340.2 ± 25.440.9 ± 34.147.4 ± 24.938.8 ± 27.7
PCS78.4 ± 12.879.5 ± 12.874.0 ± 12.278.0 ± 11.278.4 ± 13.2
GH54.3 ± 24.656.1 ± 26.347.6 ± 14.953.5 ± 19.854.4 ± 25.6
PF91.3 ± 7.892.5 ± 7.286.8 ± 8.2 **92.1 ± 5.891.1 ± 8.1
RP83.2 ± 29.484.5 ± 28.578.4 ± 33.081.6 ± 31.083.5 ± 29.3
BP84.7 ± 16.485.1 ± 17.283.1 ± 13.484.7 ± 16.485.1 ± 17.2
MCS72.6 ± 16.674.0 ± 15.767.4 ± 19.173.8 ± 16.772.3 ± 16.7
MH66.5 ± 15.767.2 ± 14.763.8 ± 18.964.2 ± 20.167.0 ± 14.6
VT67.9 ± 15.968.7 ± 15.364.8 ± 17.967.6 ± 21.467.9 ± 14.5
SF83.5 ± 15.684.8 ± 15.478.8 ± 16.084.2 ± 15.483.4 ± 15.8
RE72.4 ± 36.775.2 ± 35.162.1 ± 41.578.9 ± 33.771.0 ± 37.4
** p < 0.01, comparison between female and male group. ## p < 0.01, comparison between mild to moderate group and severe liver steatosis group.
Table 2. Grades of health-related fitness in NAFLD patients (N = 104).
Table 2. Grades of health-related fitness in NAFLD patients (N = 104).
VariablesProportion (%) χ2P
VO2max
GenderPoorFairAverageGoodExcellent6.4560.168
Male, n (%)57 (69.5%)18 (22.0%)5 (6.1%)0 (0.0%)2 (2.4%)
Female, n (%)12 (60.0%)4 (20.0%)3 (15.0%)1 (5.0%)0 (0.0%)
All, n (%)69 (67.6%)22 (21.6%)8 (7.8%)1 (1.0%)2 (2.0%)
Grip strength
GenderGrade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 52.4550.783
Male, n (%)16 (19.5%)22 (26.8%)28 (34.1%)9 (11.0%)5 (6.1%)
Female, n (%)3 (13.6%)8 (36.4%)6 (27.3%)4 (18.2%)1 (4.5%)
All, n (%)19 (18.3%)30 (28.8%)34 (32.7%)13 (12.5%)6 (5.8%)
Sitting forward flexion
GenderGrade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 513.0150.011
Male, n (%)22 (26.8%)23 (28.0%)6 (7.3%)5 (6.1%)0 (0.0%)
Female, n (%)4 (18.2%)3 (13.6%)8 (36.4%)1 (4.5%)0 (0.0%)
All, n (%)26 (25.0%)26 (25.0%)14 (13.5%)6 (5.8%)0 (0.0%)
P for comparison between female and male group.
Table 3. Correlation between health-related fitness and QoL (N = 104).
Table 3. Correlation between health-related fitness and QoL (N = 104).
VariablesHTPCSGHPFRPBPMCSMHVTSFRE
BMI−0.193 *0.000−0.187−0.1020.211 *−0.0510.0090.035−0.054−0.0480.045
PBF−0.199 *−0.197 *−0.337 **−0.380 **0.054−0.029−0.079−0.015−0.190−0.083−0.019
VFA−0.245 *−0.109−0.313 **−0.298 **0.1490.004−0.046−0.014−0.200 *−0.0880.046
PSM0.1710.215 *0.315 **0.392 **−0.0160.0430.1000.0330.1920.0950.044
WC−0.278 **−0.032−0.199 *−0.1110.146−0.013−0.0130.022−0.140−0.0530.051
HC−0.202 *0.057−0.184−0.0790.230 *0.0780.050−0.005−0.134−0.0140.157
WHR−0.274 **−0.113−0.144−0.0930.006−0.102−0.0550.050−0.084−0.053−0.063
VO2max0.1190.1340.242 *0.318 **−0.006−0.0830.013−0.0020.1120.099−0.066
RGS0.0350.1260.0320.0500.1050.1330.1730.0850.1450.1220.162
SFF0.0340.0030.0700.044−0.0740.0140.1310.0930.198 *0.0170.105
GS−0.1320.1410.0420.1500.1470.0420.1150.0590.0650.1110.107
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table 4. Multiple regression analysis of quality of life.
Table 4. Multiple regression analysis of quality of life.
Dependent Variable Unstandardized CoefficientsStandardized Coefficients95% CIP
BStandard ErrorβLowerUpper
HTIntercept110.49824.161 62.575158.4220.004
WC−0.7060.242−0.278−1.185−0.226
GHIntercept100.44212.977 74.703126.1810.004
PBF−1.4490.401−0.337−2.243−0.654
PFIntercept56.1047.493 33.43868.821<0.001
PSM0.6900.2040.3210.2861.094
VO2max0.2780.1250.2110.0300.526
RPIntercept−16.49241.884 −99.56866.5840.019
HC0.9480.3980.2300.1601.737
PCSIntercept49.24713.142 23.18075.3140.028
PSM0.7620.3430.2150.0831.441
VTIntercept78.0185.149 67.80588.2320.003
VFA−0.0810.039−0.200−0.160−0.003
Adjusted for sex, age, comorbidity and degree of liver steatosis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Yan, W.; Ren, H. The Relationship between Health-Related Fitness and Quality of Life in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114215

AMA Style

Wang L, Zhang J, Liu Y, Zhou H, Yan W, Ren H. The Relationship between Health-Related Fitness and Quality of Life in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(21):14215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114215

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Lina, Jing Zhang, Yali Liu, Huixuan Zhou, Wenjing Yan, and Hong Ren. 2022. "The Relationship between Health-Related Fitness and Quality of Life in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 21: 14215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114215

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop