Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached review report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The work entitled:" HPV Vaccine Hesitancy and Influencing Factors Among University Students in China: A Cross-sectional Survey Based on Cs Model"  done by Huang etal is not well presented and is of moderate importance. There are some points should be addressed before being published.

1- in the introduction, the research question and the research hypothesis are need to be clarified.

2- In introduction, no information about previous similar works which is so many.

3- In introduction, the author need to clarify the challenges more.

4- In methods, clarify the sample size

5- Little English errors, please go over the manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper has been improved very well in this revision. The authors have addressed most of my comments. Well done!

One last comment is that, if possible, I hope the authors could explain or discuss that why the survey data shows low rates of HPV vaccine hesitancy in female students in the universities of China but in practice the overall HPV vaccine rate in the target population remains low in China ? 

  

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

It is ok now 

Author Response

We are grateful to the reviewer for the careful reading of the paper and the constructive suggestions for improving our work.

Thanks again to the reviewer for the support and affirmation of the article. 

All the authors