Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity in Laos Using a Three-Dimensional Tetrahedron Model
Previous Article in Journal
Incidence Characteristics and Histological Types of Head and Neck Cancer among Adults in Central Sudan: A Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Structural Equation Modeling to Examine Pathways between Physical Activity and Sleep Quality among Chinese TikTok Users
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

What Drives the Influence of Health Science Communication Accounts on TikTok? A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(21), 13815; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113815
by Ran Liu 1,2, Tianan Yang 2,3, Wenhao Deng 2,3, Xiaoyan Liu 4 and Jianwei Deng 2,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(21), 13815; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113815
Submission received: 26 August 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 24 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue TikTok and Public Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper provide an interesting topic - usage of social media in healthcare - especially TikTalk

Suggestions: 

underline the aim of study

clarify the choice and the reason why the focus of the research is on Tik Talk and not on another social network

whether there is a procedure related to the protection of patient data when using this social network

the limitations of the study are explained

it is not clear whether this social network is suggested as an official channel of communication in the function of information of importance for public health

what are the risks and dangers of using social networks

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper presented is of high quality and methodologically well thought out. Nevertheless, I think that the introduction could be made shorter and a section on the literature review should be created and  developed. On the other hand, it is not enough to say that the results contribute to the literature review, it is necessary to conform these data to what exists in the literature review.
On page 4, there is a figure on research mode, which I think would be better in a chapter on work methodology and not at the end of the introduction.

Finally, the questions I was going to ask about the research design of this paper have already been presented by the authors in the chapter on limitations and future research. I think this chapter should come after the conclusions and not before.

The conclusions should also be improved, because what is there is too similar to the abstract text.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop