Next Article in Journal
Are We Teaching Nurses to Be Racist towards Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples? A Critical Race Document Analysis of Discrete Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Courses
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Antecedents and Consequences of Affective and Cognitive Ruminations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 18
10.3390/ijerph191811454
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Prevalence of Mental Health Problems among Patients Treated by Emergency Medical Teams: Findings from J-SPEED Data Regarding the West Japan Heavy Rain 2018

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11454; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811454
by Yui Yumiya 1, Odgerel Chimed-Ochir 1, Akihiro Taji 1, Eisaku Kishita 2, Kouki Akahoshi 3, Hisayoshi Kondo 3, Akinori Wakai 3, Kayoko Chishima 3, Yoshiki Toyokuni 3, Yuichi Koido 3, Hirokazu Tachikawa 4, Sho Takahashi 4, Sayaka Gomei 5,6, Yuzuru Kawashima 3,6 and Tatsuhiko Kubo 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Pedro Melo
Reviewer 2:
Giovanna Caparello
Reviewer 3:
Amanda Losi
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11454; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811454
Submission received: 4 August 2022 / Revised: 9 September 2022 / Accepted: 9 September 2022 / Published: 12 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Public Health Statistics and Risk Assessment)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors, thank you for presenting this important study developed from your team. 

I have some suggestions to improve your manuscript:

1) In the introduction, consider incorporate the aims of your study;

2) in the results, consider put the description of figures after the figure presentation. It is more friendly and comprehensive for the reader;

3) Maybe in the conclusions you can incorporate, although the limitations presented in the end of the results, the contributions for research, clinical practice and for society (considering the improvement of the quality of the assistance to these kinds of citizens after a disaster period. 

4) There is any explicit reference to ethical procedures and authorizations. Can you incorporate these information?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Material and Methods are well described, but the authors could explain the statistical method used also under the Figures. I mean just, to indicate the method used.

I suggest increasing the bibliography, especially in the discussion, which should be better argued.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors, 

Many thanks for the opportunity to read your paper: it is well done and very interesting

Introduction, in a simple way, presents the topic

methods are correct and well reported

Statistics: those who have no high level of medical statistics find some difficulties: please improve the text and make it easier to understand.

Results are precise with nice graph plots

Discussion: 

Do you think that the absence of a shared decision-making process could have a role in all mental diseases? Could this problem have made worse the situation ? ( doi: 10.1111/jep.13300. Epub 2019 Oct 29. PMID: 31661726) (I'm not the author)

Conclusions are adequate 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop