Next Article in Journal
Identifying and Addressing Implicit Ageism in the Co-Design of Services for Aging People
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of COVID-19 on Urban Mobility and Parking Demand Distribution: A Global Review with Case Study in Melbourne, Australia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Discussions of Flavored ENDS Sales Restrictions: Themes Related to Circumventing Policies on Reddit

1
Truth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, DC 20001, USA
2
NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60603, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(13), 7668; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137668
Submission received: 29 April 2022 / Revised: 10 June 2022 / Accepted: 17 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022

Abstract

:
Objective: To examine conversations among JUUL users on Reddit related to restrictions on flavored ENDS and the shifting policy landscape. Methods: Posts and comments (n = 166,169) between May 2019 and May 2020 on the subreddit r/JUUL were scraped using pushshift.io API. Keyword filters were used to identify texts discussing flavored ENDS products (n = 33,884 texts). These were further narrowed down to texts discussing flavor policy workaround strategies (n = 7429) and N-gram analysis was performed. Finally, findings from the N-gram analysis were triangulated through qualitative review of a separate sample of texts (n = 488) from the flavor policy-related posts and comments. Results: Overall activity on the subreddit r/JUUL peaked around the time of the EVALI outbreak (September 2019) and when FDA issued guidance restricting flavored ENDS product sales (January 2020). The N-gram analysis revealed an active discussion of banned products one can “still get” or “JUUL compatible” alternatives, including specific brands, brick and mortar locations, and specific flavors. Ten dominant themes emerged from the qualitative review, with some posts containing more than one theme. Conclusion: Many users turned to Reddit for information related to the shifting regulatory landscape concerning flavored ENDS. Discussions focused on both legal alternatives to banned products as well as illegal means of acquiring JUUL pods, including residual retail supply, online, and mail vendors.

1. Introduction

Ongoing efforts to restrict the availability of flavored tobacco products necessitates careful examination of the public response to a rapidly evolving electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) marketplace. In the wake of the e-cigarette or vaping use-related lung injury (EVALI) outbreak in September 2019, electronic cigarette manufacturer JUUL voluntarily removed flavored pods aside from tobacco and menthol from the U.S. market [1]. JUUL’s voluntary withdrawal was followed up by FDA guidance in January 2020 which removed all flavored pod-based ENDS from the marketplace [2]. At the time, JUUL was the most popular reusable e-cigarette on the market, attracting a large number of users through their flavored and high nicotine strength products [3,4]. This shift in the policy landscape resulted in bare shelves inevitably leaving users of JUUL’s popular flavored pods with questions and motivation to find alternative products.
Flavored Tobacco Product (FTP) policies play a critical role in reducing the access and availability of these products [5], particularly given the tobacco industry’s historical targeting of youth using flavored products that are easier to initiate and thus more likely to lead to sustained use [6]. However, unintended consumer adaptations to FTP restrictions such as switching to alternative products or identifying alternative supply sources can undermine the effectiveness of such policies [7]. As a result, continuous evaluation of consumer responses to policy changes is an essential component of evidence-based policy making [8]. Thus, examining JUUL pod user responses during the course of policy implementation can inform how to optimize the policy and its public health benefits [9].
Since the initial ban on flavored pods, many users simply switched to alternative flavored products [10]. Bans that were initially imposed locally led to increased internet sales and cross-border purchases of the banned flavors [11]. JUUL users reported using generic pods or disposable products, stockpiling banned flavors, and purchasing banned flavors from stores that illegally sold them [11,12]. Moreover, new disposable flavored products took over JUUL’s market share, exposing a loophole wherein such disposable devices were not subject to the flavor restrictions as they were technically different products [13]. Such loopholes in the sales environment and the potential for substituting products undermined the intention of the new FTP policy in addition to leaving unanswered questions for users navigating a sudden absence of their preferred product.
The abrupt change in the product landscape caused by the flavored pod ban likely lead users to rely on social media platforms for up-to-date information. Changes at the societal level, such as a shift in policy banning a popular product, can lead people to mediated channels [14], particularly social media [15,16], to understand the implications of such changes on their lives. Given inconsistent information about ENDS in general has been shown to drive users to social media [17], we suggest that such a dramatic shift in the ENDS product landscape would lead JUUL users to social media to investigate and understand how the flavored pod-based ENDS ban would affect them. Because policy and regulation is one of the major themes discussed on ENDS-related social media, analyzing such discourse around the time of policy implementation can offer useful and unobtrusive access to public sentiment and response to regulatory action [17]. We can leverage these immediate responses and resulting changes in use behaviors to identify gaps and address them in future policy iterations.
Not surprisingly, a robust community of JUUL users on Reddit, a popular moderated, forum-based social media platform, provided lots of discussion about the new FTP restrictions, as users sought information regarding how the newly imposed ban affects them, as well as instrumental support regarding the residual availability of newly banned products, replacement alternatives, and other means of adjusting to or even evading the consequences of the new flavor policy. Examining these discussions can help to evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of this policy. Though by no means immune to the limitations of data from other social media platforms, posts from Reddit are often detailed and candid and focus on shared experiences rather than punchy sound bites [18], and thus may be better suited to capture the nuances of day-to-day experiences related to navigating a changing product landscape. Reddit has been used in recent years to track the popularity of various flavors, underage use, and even potential effects of flavored ENDS products [19,20,21,22,23].
This study aims to leverage Reddit discussions among JUUL users to better examine how they responded to real-time changes in FTP policies. Although the rise in popularity of disposable flavored products is likely the direct result of the most recent wave of FTP policies [10], understanding how users of the affected products leverage informal communication channels such as Reddit during such a transitionary period can potentially help to more effectively anticipate unintended consequences of future FTP policies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Procedure

To examine how users of flavored ENDS responded to shifting FTP policies, we collected, parsed, and analyzed posts and comments from r/JUUL using the third-party archive of Reddit content, pushshift.io API, to scrape all posts and comments between 1 May 2019 and 31 May 2020. Although we were primarily interested in the time period from August 2019 to January 2020, which included EVALI, JUUL’s voluntary removal of flavored pods, and the FDA’s guidance to ban flavored pods, we gathered the whole year of data to place these events within the context of the whole year. Two keyword filters were validated and used to narrow the total sample of texts down to those related to flavors and then further to those associated with FTP policies. Analyses of post and comment volume over time, N-gram analysis of relevant content identified by our keyword filters, and qualitative analysis of content identified by human coders were used to systematically examine the most common responses to the recently imposed regulations. All validated search parameters are available in the Supplementary Table S1.

2.2. Data Acquisition and Classification

An initial corpus of n = 166,169 texts (posts and comments) was retrieved from r/JUUL for further classification. Keyword filters were first used to identify texts discussing flavored ENDS products, and then further filtered to identify FTP policy-related content. For the flavor filter, n = 2500 posts were dual coded for correct identification of flavored ENDS product relevance (kalpha = 0.92). The filter performed well in accurately identifying flavor-related content (precision = 0.87, recall = 1, F1 = 0.93). This initial filter yielded a flavor-related corpus of n = 33,884 texts. We then used a keyword filter to identify policy-related texts from within the flavor-related corpus. To evaluate the accuracy of this keyword filter, n = 200 posts were dual coded for the correct identification of relevant content. The coders were reliable (kalpha = 0.88), and the filter was sufficiently accurate (precision = 0.88, recall = 0.76, F1 = 0.82). N-gram analysis was then performed on n = 7429 texts that our filters categorized as about FTP policies to provide insight into the content of these discussions through identifying the most common one, two, and three-word phrases.
To triangulate findings from our N-gram analysis, we randomly sampled n = 2000 texts from the 33,884 flavor-related texts for human coding. Two independent coders reliably (kalpha = 0.88) identified n = 488 texts related to FTP policy workarounds which were set aside for qualitative examination. All discrepancies were adjudicated by the study’s lead analyst. This extra round of human coding was performed to assure that qualitative examination would be conducted only on relevant content. In doing so, we both corroborate and add context and nuance to findings from our machine-driven approach.

2.3. Analyses

Three sets of analyses were conducted to further examine our data. First, using our filters, we graphed text volume by month for flavor and FTP policy-related content as a proportion of total content on the r/JUUL subreddit to visualize the relationship between the inciting event, EVALI, the ensuing ban on flavored pod devices, and the resulting discussion on Reddit. Next, we identified the most frequent words, bigrams, and trigrams (two and three word sets) among the n = 7429 texts identified by our relevance filters to better understand the content of FTP policy-related discussions. Finally, to triangulate inferences based on N-gram analysis, we qualitatively examined a subsample of n = 488 texts identified by human coders as about FTP work around strategies.

3. Results

3.1. Temporal Analysis through Visualization

Figure 1 provides a visualization contextualizing FTP policy workaround discussion during the five-month period, including the EVALI outbreak in September 2019, the subsequent halting of flavored pod sales by JUUL, and culminating in FDA guidance to remove flavored pods from the market in January 2020, within overall activity on the r/JUUL subreddit from May 2019 to May 2020. Overall activity on the JUUL subreddit increased consistently beginning in June of 2019, with a sharp increase and initial peak coinciding with media coverage of EVALI [24,25], reaching a zenith in November 2019 shortly after JUUL announced voluntary removal of its flavored pods from the market, and then declining sharply beginning January 2019 following the FDA’s guidance to remove all flavored pods from the market. General flavor discussions followed a similar pattern, minus the initial peak associated with EVALI. Finally, although not as dramatic as the peaks in the two broader categories, FTP policy workaround discussion steadily increased from May through November of 2019, peaking in November. A second peak in late January coincided with the FDA’s announcement.

3.2. N-Gram Analysis

Table 1 provides the most common words, bigrams, and trigrams suggesting an active discussion of what sort of pods one can “still get”, whether there were “JUUL compatible” alternatives including specific brands (e.g., Mr. Fog Pods) and brick and mortar locations (e.g., gas station, local vape shop), presumably in an effort to locate specific pod flavors (e.g., mint, mango). Phrases such as “black market THC” and “black market pods” indicate significant discussion of illicit markets, though N-gram analysis does not make clear whether these conversations were in reference to the role of illicit THC (i.e., tetrahydrocannabinol) cartridges in the EVALI outbreak, active attempts to gain access to illicit sources of newly unavailable pods, or a combination of the two.

3.3. Qualitative Analysis

The qualitative review revealed ten dominant themes across workaround-related content, with some posts containing more than one theme. More than one in three posts (39%) were seeking advice on disposable or refillable substitute brands that offered newly unavailable flavors, including 5.9% which named specific refillable pod device brands including Caliburn (9), Smok (7), Voopoo (1), Novo (7), and Vuse (5). One post mentioned OVNS, a refillable pod brand that is compatible with JUUL devices. Advice on product availability in localities where the ban had recently gone into effect (e.g., Massachusetts, Michigan, etc.) was sought in 23% of posts. Furthermore, 20% of posts inquired about how to acquire products online, while 16% concerned the ability to import products from abroad (e.g., Canada, Russia, and UK). Other topics were present in fewer than 5% of reviewed posts. For example, 4% discussed stockpiling or bulk buying and 2.5% sought advice on counterfeit, third-party, and off-brand pods. Fewer than 1% of posts concerned petitioning authorities regarding the newly imposed regulations, substituting other tobacco products including cigarettes and smokeless products, obtaining products from friends or family, and modifying unflavored pods using accessories or “slip-tips”. Thematic analysis reaffirmed findings from the N-gram analysis showing an overwhelming majority of discussions related to the newly imposed flavor restrictions were focused on the availability of alternatives and how to obtain them. Discussions of a “black market” identified in N-gram analysis were revealed to focus on the role of illicit market THC pods in the EVALI outbreak, decrying that a ban on flavored pods would inevitably lead to an illicit market, as well as seeking potential illicit market sources. The prominence of “mango” and “mint” in our N-gram analysis was indicative of the two most popular JUUL pod flavors [26] also being the most sought-out in FTP policy workaround-related discussions on Reddit.

4. Discussion

This study describes the content of discussions by flavored JUUL pod users to the evolving flavored product restrictions in real time. Significant spikes in usage of the r/JUUL subreddit corresponding to EVALI, JUUL’s voluntary removal of flavored pods, and again following issuance of FDA guidance suggest that the r/JUUL subreddit is a popular online platform for users to discuss product and policy shifts related to ENDS. The period between the EVALI outbreak and the FDA guidance removing flavored pods from the market saw a substantial increase in both overall activity on the subreddit as well as discussions related to the implications of the flavor ban. Qualitative review of these posts revealed that 95% of them concerned either alternative means of acquiring newly banned flavors or soliciting similar alternative products. Although there was some discussion of illicit markets, most discussions blamed the illicit market of THC cartridges for the new restrictions on JUUL pods. These findings highlight both the utility of Reddit for evaluating the public’s response and the potential limitations of newly enacted FTP policy.
The findings also highlight the need for comprehensive flavor restrictions given the almost instantaneous response of JUUL pod users to identify alternative flavored products. Although JUUL was credited with the popularity of ENDS with youth, disposable flavored ENDS brands quickly filled the void left by JUUL pods [10]. Discussions about alternatives and residual supply were among the most common topics of discussion related to the new flavor restrictions. It is noteworthy that two of the brands identified in our qualitative analysis as alternatives include Vuse and Smok, which were identified as two of the four most popular brands with youth along with JUUL and puff bar [27]. Consistent with previous research [28,29], the implications of this quick response to identify alternative products strongly indicates flavors as a crucial component for using ENDS products. Thus, effective flavor policy should focus not only on the specific products currently used by youth and young adults [30], but rather focus more broadly on anticipating the consumer response and market innovations by restricting all flavored products including low-cost-of-entry flavored pod devices and disposables.
Although discourse surrounding tobacco regulation spans a variety of social media platforms, Reddit may be of particular use in examining more in-depth discussions. Reddit currently has over 440 million active users [31], but most importantly allows for long posts on moderated, topic-specific forums called subreddits, which can be discussed in depth by an anonymous user-base. Thus, Reddit offers a valuable starting place to monitor discussions that may help uncover consumer strategies used to circumvent recent federal and local FTP policies. This study documents how JUUL users learned their preferred pods would be removed from the market, turned to Reddit for information on alternatives, switched to a variety of alternative products, and even gave rise to a new market segment of disposable flavored products. The emergence of DIY communities for mixing flavors [32], legal debates over what is and is not a tobacco product and thus subject to tobacco regulations [33,34,35], and the ability of ENDS manufacturers to adapt to new regulations through unanticipated loopholes [36] highlights the need for expedient means of monitoring policy evasion strategies.

Limitations and Future Directions

Although this study has many strengths, it is not without limitations. First, the selection biases inherent in social media sampling limits the generalizability of these findings. However, triangulating the findings in this study with data from other sources serves to support these findings, which highlight the quick market shift to disposable flavored brands such as Puff Bar [10]. Secondly, our use of machine learning classifiers to identify flavor policy evasion content within the broader corpus of the whole subreddit lacks precision, since classification algorithms are based on probability and thus subject to misclassification. However, we adhere to rigid criteria for evaluating the quality of these classifiers using both human coders and established conventions, as well as a subsequent qualitative examination of a subsample of posts to provide more nuance than machine coding alone can provide. This study should not be interpreted as an exhaustive examination of FTP policy workaround discussion on Reddit, as we focused on the JUUL-specific subreddit without examining more general ENDS subreddits identified by previous research [37]. Finally, the anonymity of Reddit users limits the generalizability of our findings. However, previous research identified a significant overlap in users of the now-removed r/underageJuul subreddit and r/JUUL [21], strongly suggesting that much of the examined discussion was among young and even teenage users.

5. Conclusions

Flavors are consistently identified as the leading reason for tobacco product trial and use, particularly among young people [26,30]. As a result, restricting flavors is an important objective for helping to reduce tobacco use. However, piecemeal approaches to flavor policy are unlikely to be effective [38], as tech-savvy users can turn to an expansive information economy on social media platforms such as Reddit to identify gaps and loopholes in existing FTP policies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph19137668/s1, Table S1. Validated search parameters used to identify posts mentioning flavors and flavor workarounds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.K.; methodology, G.K., H.T., M.F. and S.E.; validation, G.K., H.T. and M.F.; formal analysis, G.K.; investigation G.K., H.T. and M.F.; data curation, G.K.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S. and P.K.; writing—review and editing, N.S., P.K., G.K., H.T., M.F., S.E. and B.S.; visualization, H.T.; supervision, N.S., S.E. and B.S.; project administration, N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding for this study has been provided by Truth Initiative.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the use of publicly available data.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the third author. The data are a proprietary of NORC are not publicly available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Juul Labs Inc. JUUL Labs Suspends Sale of Non-Tobacco, Non-Menthol-Based Flavors in the U.S.; Juul Labs Inc.: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Finalizes Enforcement Policy on Unauthorized Flavored Cartridge-Based e-Cigarettes That Appeal to Children, Including Fruit and Mint; Food and Drug Administration: White Oak, MA, USA, 2020.
  3. Ali, F.R.M.; Vallone, D.; Seaman, E.L.; Cordova, J.; Diaz, M.C.; Tynan, M.A.; Trivers, K.F.; King, B.A. Evaluation of Statewide Restrictions on Flavored e-Cigarette Sales in the US From 2014 to 2020. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e2147813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, J.; Duan, Z.; Kwok, J.; Binns, S.; Vera, L.E.; Kim, Y.; Szczypka, G.; Emery, S.L. Vaping versus JUULing: How the extraordinary growth and marketing of JUUL transformed the US retail e-cigarette market. Tob. Control 2019, 28, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Donovan, E.; Folger, S.; Akbar, M.; Schillo, B. Classifying the comprehensiveness of flavoured tobacco sales restrictions: Development and application of a tool to examine US state and local tobacco policies. Tob. Control 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Audrain-McGovern, J.; Strasser, A.A.; Wileyto, E.P. The impact of flavoring on the rewarding and reinforcing value of e-cigarettes with nicotine among young adult smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016, 166, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Rogers, T.; Brown, E.M.; Siegel-Reamer, L.; Rahman, B.; Feld, A.L.; Patel, M.; Vallone, D.; Schillo, B.A. A comprehensive qualitative review of studies evaluating the impact of local US laws restricting the sale of flavored and menthol tobacco products. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2022, 24, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Levy, D.T.; Tam, J.; Kuo, C.; Fong, G.T.; Chaloupka, F. Research full report: The impact of implementing tobacco control policies: The 2017 tobacco control policy scorecard. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 2018, 24, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chung-Hall, J.; Fong, G.T.; Meng, G.; Cummings, K.M.; Hyland, A.; O’Connor, R.J.; Quah, A.C.K.; Craig, L.V. Evaluating the impact of menthol cigarette bans on cessation and smoking behaviours in Canada: Longitudinal findings from the Canadian arm of the 2016–2018 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys. Tob. Control 2021, 31, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dai, H.; Hao, J. Online popularity of JUUL and Puff Bars in the USA: 2019–2020. Tob. Control 2022, 31, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, Y.; Lindblom, E.N.; Salloum, R.G.; Ward, K.D. The impact of a comprehensive tobacco product flavor ban in San Francisco among young adults. Addict. Behav. Rep. 2020, 11, 100273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yingst, J.M.; Bordner, C.R.; Hobkirk, A.L.; Hoglen, B.; Allen, S.I.; Krebs, N.M.; Houser, K.R.; Livelsberger, C.; Foulds, J. Response to flavored cartridge/pod-based product ban among adult JUUL users:“You get nicotine however you can get it”. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leventhal, A.M.; Dai, H. Prevalence of flavored e-cigarette use among subpopulations of adults in the United States. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2021, 113, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ball-Rokeach, S.J. Media system dependency theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jang, K.; Baek, Y.M. When information from public health officials is untrustworthy: The use of online news, interpersonal networks, and social media during the MERS outbreak in South Korea. Health Commun. 2019, 34, 991–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, Y.-C.; Jung, J.-Y. SNS dependency and interpersonal storytelling: An extension of media system dependency theory. New Media Soc. 2017, 19, 1458–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kwon, M.; Park, E. Perceptions and sentiments about electronic cigarettes on social media platforms: Systematic review. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020, 6, e13673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Manikonda, L.; Beigi, G.; Liu, H.; Kambhampati, S. Twitter for sparking a movement, reddit for sharing the moment:# metoo through the lens of social media. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1803.08022. [Google Scholar]
  19. Brett, E.I.; Stevens, E.M.; Wagener, T.L.; Leavens, E.L.S.; Morgan, T.L.; Cotton, W.D.; Hébert, E.T. A content analysis of JUUL discussions on social media: Using Reddit to understand patterns and perceptions of JUUL use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019, 194, 358–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, L.; Zhan, Y.; Li, Q.; Zeng, D.D.; Leischow, S.J.; Okamoto, J. An examination of electronic cigarette content on social media: Analysis of e-cigarette flavor content on Reddit. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 14916–14935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zhan, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Okamoto, J.M.; Zeng, D.D.; Leischow, S.J. Underage JUUL use patterns: Content analysis of Reddit messages. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019, 21, e13038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Luo, J.; Chen, L.; Lu, X.; Yuan, J.; Xie, Z.; Li, D. Analysis of potential associations of JUUL flavours with health symptoms based on user-generated data from Reddit. Tob. Control 2021, 30, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lu, X.; Chen, L.; Yuan, J.; Luo, J.; Luo, J.; Xie, Z.; Li, D. User perceptions of different electronic cigarette flavors on social media: Observational study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e17280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Karlamangla, S. Hundreds of People Nationwide Fall Ill from Vaping, Including One Death in L.A. County. Los Angeles Times, 6 September 2019. Available online: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-09-06/vaping-death-los-angeles-county(accessed on 6 June 2022).
  25. LaVito, A. Death Toll Rises from Mysterious Lung Illnesses Linked to Vaping, Prompting CDC to Sound Alarm on e-Cigarettes; CNBC: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  26. Morean, M.E.; Bold, K.W.; Kong, G.; Camenga, D.R.; Jackson, A.; Simon, P.; Davis, D.R.; Krishnan-Sarin, S. High school students’ use of JUUL pod flavors before and after JUUL implemented voluntary sales restrictions on certain flavors in 2018. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0243368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. An e-Cigarette Market Update: Flavored Products Remain Widely Available Three Months after Court-Ordered Deadline for Fda to Rule on Marketing Applications; Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  28. Landry, R.L.; Groom, A.L.; Vu, T.-H.T.; Stokes, A.C.; Berry, K.M.; Kesh, A.; Hart, J.L.; Walker, K.L.; Giachello, A.L.; Sears, C.G. The role of flavors in vaping initiation and satisfaction among US adults. Addict. Behav. 2019, 99, 106077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Pepper, J.K.; Ribisl, K.M.; Brewer, N.T. Adolescents’ interest in trying flavoured e-cigarettes. Tob. Control 2016, 25, ii62–ii66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zare, S.; Nemati, M.; Zheng, Y. A systematic review of consumer preference for e-cigarette attributes: Flavor, nicotine strength, and type. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Statista. Regional Distribution of Desktop Traffic to Reddit.com as of June 2021, by Country; Statista: Hamburg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  32. Inverse. The DIY Vape Juice Scene Is Booming after Bans Threaten Flavors Nationwide; Inverse: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  33. Maloney, J. Puff Bar defies FDA crackdown on fruity e-cigarettes by ditching the tobacco. Wall Str. J. 2021. Available online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/puff-bar-defies-fda-crackdown-on-fruity-e-cigarettes-by-ditching-the-tobacco-11614681003 (accessed on 29 June 2021).
  34. Jordt, S.-E. Synthetic Nicotine Has Arrived; BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen-Sankey, J.; Ganz, O.; Seidenberg, A.; Choi, K. Effect of a ‘tobacco-free nicotine’claim on intentions and perceptions of Puff Bar e-cigarette use among non-tobacco-using young adults. Tob. Control 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chu, K.-H.; Hershey, T.B.; Sidani, J.E. Collaborative Public Health Strategies to Combat e-Cigarette Regulation Loopholes. JAMA Pediatr. 2021, 175, 1102–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Barker, J.O.; Rohde, J.A. Topic clustering of e-cigarette submissions among Reddit communities: A network perspective. Health Educ. Behav. 2019, 46, 59S–68S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gaiha, S.M.; Halpern-Felsher, B. Stemming the tide of youth E-cigarette use: Promising progress in the development and evaluation of E-cigarette prevention and cessation programs. Addict. Behav. 2021, 120, 106960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Temporal graphs comparing trends of the volume of activity on r/JUUL related to flavors and strategies to evade flavored product restrictions as well as all activity on the subreddit. (Top) FTP policy workaround discussion (blue) as a portion of flavor discussion (orange) as a portion of all activity on the subreddit (gray). (Bottom) The all activity (gray) portion is removed to better visualize the variation in FTP policy workaround discussion (blue) as a portion of all flavor-related discussion (orange).
Figure 1. Temporal graphs comparing trends of the volume of activity on r/JUUL related to flavors and strategies to evade flavored product restrictions as well as all activity on the subreddit. (Top) FTP policy workaround discussion (blue) as a portion of flavor discussion (orange) as a portion of all activity on the subreddit (gray). (Bottom) The all activity (gray) portion is removed to better visualize the variation in FTP policy workaround discussion (blue) as a portion of all flavor-related discussion (orange).
Ijerph 19 07668 g001
Table 1. Most frequently used terms (n-grams) related to flavored electronic cigarette policy restrictions workarounds.
Table 1. Most frequently used terms (n-grams) related to flavored electronic cigarette policy restrictions workarounds.
UnigramnBigramnTrigramn
juul6964juul pods1044juul compatible pods211
pods6577black market644black market thc184
get3969mint pods495mint juul pods68
like3239mango pods491black market carts66
mint3224compatible pods342get mango pods58
mango2899juul compatible341get mint pods55
pod1940juul pod222market thc carts53
flavors1770flavored pods217mango juul pods52
flavor1762like juul215black market pods42
menthol1552virginia tobacco214menthol juul pods40
one1441jewel mint208nic salt juice38
tobacco1365juul mint199market thc cartridges38
still1248get mango191local gas station35
good1236gas station190jewel mint diamond35
would1235throat hit1863rd party pods34
pack1216market thc184juul mango pods33
juice1171juul mango176salt nic juice32
know1116mint menthol172pods juul compatible32
people1114get mint166get flavored pods31
also1111salt nic163juul brand pods31
vape1098feel like162mr fog pods31
got1084menthol pods156flavored juul pods30
really1066taste like153local vape shop28
even1065tobacco menthol144third party pods28
nicotine1033still get143pod juice jewel28
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silver, N.; Kucherlapaty, P.; Kostygina, G.; Tran, H.; Feng, M.; Emery, S.; Schillo, B. Discussions of Flavored ENDS Sales Restrictions: Themes Related to Circumventing Policies on Reddit. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137668

AMA Style

Silver N, Kucherlapaty P, Kostygina G, Tran H, Feng M, Emery S, Schillo B. Discussions of Flavored ENDS Sales Restrictions: Themes Related to Circumventing Policies on Reddit. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(13):7668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137668

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silver, Nathan, Padmini Kucherlapaty, Ganna Kostygina, Hy Tran, Miao Feng, Sherry Emery, and Barbara Schillo. 2022. "Discussions of Flavored ENDS Sales Restrictions: Themes Related to Circumventing Policies on Reddit" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 13: 7668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137668

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop