Next Article in Journal
Is a Forensic Cohabitation Program Recovery-Oriented? A Logic Model Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Voice Navigation Created by VIP Improves Spatial Performance in People with Impaired Vision
Previous Article in Journal
Poor School-Related Well-Being among Adolescents with Disabilities or ADHD
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation into the Effects of Backrest Angle and Stick Location on Female Strength

Department of Occupational Safety and Health, China Medical University, Taichung City 40604, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010007
Submission received: 6 October 2021 / Revised: 5 December 2021 / Accepted: 14 December 2021 / Published: 21 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human-Computer Interaction, Ergonomics and Health)

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of backrest angle and hand maneuver direction on maximum hand strength and to recommend a strength value for the hand-controlled stick of an aircraft. Methods: Forty-eight female subjects were recruited to perform simulated forward–backward and adduction–abduction maneuvers using control sticks. Each subject was free from musculoskeletal disorders and pain. The independent variables included four control maneuvers (forward, backward, adduction, abduction), two right-hand control stick locations (central, side), and three backrest angles (90°, 103°, 108°). The dependent variable was maximum hand strength. Results: The maximum strength for forward maneuvers with both central and side sticks was strongest at a 90° backrest angle (p < 0.001). The maximum strength for adduction maneuvers with both central and side sticks was also strongest at a 90° backrest angle (p < 0.001). On the other hand, the highest strength was observed at a 108° backrest angle when pulling the stick backward (p < 0.001). The abduction strength was significantly stronger than the adduction strength with a central stick (p < 0.001), but the adduction strength was significantly stronger than the abduction strength with a side stick (p < 0.001–p = 0.017). The forward and abduction strength were significantly different in different locations (p < 0.001). The recommended strength in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) by the US FAA is higher than the strength values observed in this study. Conclusions: The backrest angle, directions, and location affected the muscular strength. The recommended values should be reevaluated and adjusted for Taiwanese pilots.
Keywords: aircraft controller; design; maximum strength aircraft controller; design; maximum strength

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lo, V.E.-W.; Chao, S.-M. Investigation into the Effects of Backrest Angle and Stick Location on Female Strength. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010007

AMA Style

Lo VE-W, Chao S-M. Investigation into the Effects of Backrest Angle and Stick Location on Female Strength. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lo, Victor Ei-Wen, and Shu-Min Chao. 2022. "Investigation into the Effects of Backrest Angle and Stick Location on Female Strength" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010007

APA Style

Lo, V. E.-W., & Chao, S.-M. (2022). Investigation into the Effects of Backrest Angle and Stick Location on Female Strength. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010007

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop