Psychodrama Group Therapy for Social Issues: A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Procedure
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.3. Coding the Publications
3. Results
3.1. Scientific Production and Quality of the Publications
3.2. Problems Treated
Study | Sample | Variables | Measures | Outcomes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carbonell y Parteleno-Barehmi, 1999 [70] | Subclinical | Depression, verbal aggression, delinquent behavior, thought problems, somatic complaints, social (withdrawn) problems, attention-seeking behaviors, and phobic-anxious behavior | YSR | PD/CG post: Withdrawn: F = 10.47 *; anxious/depressed: F = 5.97 *; somatic: F = 1.04; social problems: F = 4.02; thought problems: F = 2.88; Attention problems: F = 0.14; delinquent behavior: F = 1.96; aggressive: F = 3.72. | Pre/Post |
Singal, 2003 [65] | Clinical | Impulsivity, empathy, self-esteem, oppositional behaviors | MFFT BEES SEI CRS-R JI | PD/CG post: Latency response: F = 7.69 *; error: F = 0.46; empathy: F = 1.78; self-esteem: F = 0.56; CRS-R, parents’ reports: oppositional subscale: F = 6.07 *, cognitive problems/inattention subscale: F = 0.04, hyperactivity subscale: F = 0.57, and ADHD index subscale: F = 1.47. CRS-R, teachers’ reports: oppositional subscale: F = 11.83 *, cognitive problems/inattention subscale: F = 0.21, hyperactivity subscale: F = 1.13, and ADHD index subscale: F = 0.54. | Pre/Post |
Karataş y Gökçakan, 2009a [67] | Subclinical | Physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, hostility, indirect aggression, total aggression | Aggression Scale | CBT/CG. Total aggression: F = 117.092 *; physical aggression: F = 37.74 *; anger: F = 50.04 *; hostility: F = 27.23 *; indirect aggression: F = 24.04 *. PD/CG post: Total aggression: F = 65.10 *; anger: F = 20.17 *; hostility: F = 18.59 *; indirect aggression: F = 40.99 *. CBT/PD post: Total aggression: F =15.22 *; physical aggression: F = 28.02 *; anger: F = 10.67 * Non-significant differences; post-test/follow-up in both experimental groups. | Pre/Post/3-month follow-up |
Karataş y Gökçakan, 2009b [68] | Subclinical | Physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, hostility, indirect aggression, total aggression | Aggression Scale | Total aggression: F = 65.11 ***; physical aggression: F = 3.38; verbal aggression: F = 1.85; anger: F = 20.17 ***; hostility: F = 18.59 ***; indirect aggression: F = 40.99 *** Non-significant differences; post-test/follow-up in P group | Pre/Post/3-month follow-up |
Smokowski y Bacallao, 2009 [69] | Subclinical | Parent-adolescent conflict, oppositional defiant problems, anxious-depressed problems | CBCL CBQ-20 | Oppositional defiant behavior: F = 5.50 ***; Anxious-depressed behavior: F = 3.80 **; Parent-adolescent conflict: F = 4.10 ***; Total problems: F = 3.30 * | Pre/12-month follow-up |
Dogan, 2010 [64] | Community | Anxiety, avoidance | ECR-R | PD pre/post: Anxiety: z = −2.36 *; Avoidance: z = −1.51. CG pre/post: Anxiety: z = −1.60; Avoidance: z = −0.80. | Pre/post |
Gatta et al., 2010 [63] | Clinical | Psychic suffering and behavioral disorders | SCL-90-R | PD pre/post: SOM: z =−2.02 *; O-C: z = −0.53; IntSens: z = −0.41; DEP: z = −1.16; ANX: z = −1.63 *; HOS: z = −1.08; PHOB: z = −0.63; PAR: z = −1.35; PSY: z = −2.03 *; GSI: z = −1.99 *. GC pre/post: SOM: z =−1.35; O-C: z = −0.27; IntSens: z = −0.54; DEP: z = −0.67; ANX: z = −0,67; HOS: z = −0.55; PHOB: z = −0.36; PAR: z = −0.73; PSY: z = 0.00; GSI: z = −0.52. | Pre/post |
Sproesser et al., 2010 [66] | Clinical | Depression, anxiety and Parkinsonism symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional functioning, and social functioning | BDI STAI PDQL | Depression. PD, pre (M = 23, StD = 12), post (M = 9, StD = 9); CG, (M = 11, StD = 6), post (M = 12, StD = 6) ** Anxiety. PD, pre (M = 49, StD = 11), post (M = 34, StD = 11); CG, pre (M = 43, StD = 12), post (M = 46, StD = 14) ** Quality of life. PD, pre (M = 95, StD = 16), post (M = 77, StD = 22); CG, pre (M = 94, StD = 31), post (M = 97, StD = 27) *. | Pre/post |
Karataş, 2011 [62] | Subclinical | Aggression, problem solving | CRBDS | PD/CG post: Aggression: U = 17.00 *; Problem solving: U = 2.50 *. PD/IG post: Aggression: U = 28.00 *; Problem solving: U = 0.00 *. | Pre/post/ 2.5-month follow-up |
Kähönen et al. 2012 [73] | Subclinical | Sense of coherence | OLQ-13 | PD/CG: F = 4.03 *; between second and third measurements: F = 7.78 *; PD/analytic groups: F = 3.00 *; analytic/CG, non-significant differences; six-month follow-up: analytic/PD: F = 4.36 *. | Pre/middle/post/ 6-month follow-up |
Karataş, 2014 [75] | Community | Bienestar subjetivo; desesperanza | SWS BHS | PD/GC post: Subjective well-being: U = 0.00*; Hopelessness: U = 10.00 *. PD/PG post; Subjective well-being: U = 0.00 *; Hopelessness: U = 2.50 *. Follow-up. Effect was not long-term in subject well-being (z = −2.83) *; effect was a long term in hopelessness (z = −0.93). | Pre/post/seg. 2.5-month follow-up |
Dehnavi et al., 2016 [61] | Clinical | Quality of life | SF-36 | PD/CG: Quality of life: F = 93.84 ***. | Pre/post |
Kähönen et al. 2016 [71] | Subclinical | Burnout, psychological well-being | BBI SPWB | PD/CG post: autonomy: F = 3.17 **; personal growth: F = 3.03 **. PD/analytic group post: mean change: F = 3.92 ***; Purpose in life: F = −3.36 **. PD/analytic group, follow-up mean change: F = −3.10 **. | Pre/post |
Özbas y Tel, 2016 [72] | Subclinical | Psychological empowerment, work empowerment, burnout | PES CWEQ–II MBI | Empowerment, pre/post/follow-up: F = 24.00 ***, structural empowerment, pre/post/follow-up: F = 3.86 *; emotional exhaustion, pre/post/follow-up: F = 38.55 ***, desensitization, pre/post/follow-up: F = 12.80 ***, personal achievement, pre/post/follow-up: F = 10.34 ***; empowerment, PD/CG: F = 38.00 ***; structural empowerment, PD/CG: F = 3.50; emotional exhaustion, PD/CG: F = 40.33 ***; desensitization, PD/CG: F = 24.08 ***; personal achievement, PD/CG: F = −9.68 ***. | Pre/post/ 3-month follow-up |
Dogan, 2018 [74] | Community | Empathic tendency scores | ETS | PD pre/post: ETS: z = −3.18 ***; PD/CG post: ETS: U = 28.50 ** | Pre/post |
3.3. Methodological Characteristics of the Research Carried Out
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lambert, M.; Bergin, A. The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change; Bergin, A., Garfield, S., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 143–189. [Google Scholar]
- Beitman, B.D.; Dongmei, Y. Learning Psychotherapy Seminar Leader’s Manual: A Time-Efficient, Research-Based and Outcome-Measured Psychotherapy Training Program; Norton: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Bécache, A. Un centre de santé mentale: La MGEN de Lyon [A center of mental health: The MGEN of Lyon]. L’Information Psychiatr. 1980, 56, 1071–1138. [Google Scholar]
- Bermudez de Castro, P.R. Psychodramatic Psychotherapy Group. From Practice to Theory. Rev. Clin. Contemp. 2010, 1, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carman, M.B.; Nordin, S.R. Psychodrama: A therapeutic modality for the elderly in nursing homes. Clin. Gerontol. 1984, 3, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapsambelis, V. Psychoanalytic Approaches to Psychotic Disorders in a Public Mental Health System. Br. J. Psychother. 2019, 35, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gold award: Mental health services for the deaf–St. Elizabeths Hospital, Washington, D.C. Hosp. Community Psychiatry 1978, 29, 674–677.
- Menzies, D.E. Henderson and beyond: Did the Northfield experiments influence Henderson Hospital and its Legacy? Group Anal. 2018, 51, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, J.L. Psicodrama; Paidós: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Parrish, M.M. The effect of short term psychodrama on chronic schizophrenic patients. Group Psychother. 1959, 12, 15–26. [Google Scholar]
- Olsson, P.A. Psychodrama and the Treatment of Narcissistic and Borderline Patients. Psychodyn. Psychiatry 2018, 46, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nazar, F.J.; Zare-Bahramabadi, M.; Delavar, A.; Gilan, N.R. Efficacy of psychodrama techniques in internalizing symptoms (anxiety, Depression and somatization) among adolescent girls victims of bullying in Kermanshah. J. Maz. Univ. Med. Sci. 2014, 24, 142–148. [Google Scholar]
- Robins, K. The Effectiveness of Group and Psychodrama Therapies with Female Survivors of Sexual Trauma. Ph.D. Thesis, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Majzlanová, K. Application of psychodrama with people addicted to alcohol. Ceska Slov. Psychiatr. 2013, 109, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
- Duffy, T.K. Psychodrama in beginning recovery: An illustration of goals and methods. Alcohol. Treat. Q. 1990, 7, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gump, L.R. The application of primary preventive mental health principles to the college community. Community Ment. Health J. 1973, 9, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, W.-L.; Liu, Y.-S.; Yang, C.-F. Drama Therapy Counseling as Mental Health Care of College Students. Int. J. Environ. Public Health 2019, 16, 3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Moreno, J.L. Psicoterapia de Grupo y Psicodrama; Fondo Cultura Económica: Mexico City, México, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Rojas-Bermúdez, J. Teoría y Técnicas Psicodramáticas; Paidós: Barcelona, Spain, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Moreno, J.L. Psychodramatic production techniques; the technique of role reversal, the mirror technique, the double technique and the dream technique transcript of a didactic session. Group Psychother. 1952, 4, 243–273. [Google Scholar]
- Moreno, J.L. Psychodramatic treatment of psychoses. Sociometry 1940, 3, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, J.L. Psychodramatic treatment of marriage problems. Sociometry 1940, 3, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozdel, O.; Atesci, F.; Oguzhanoglu, N.K. An anorexia nervosa case and an approach to this case with pharmacotherapy and psychodrama techniques. Turk Psikiyatr. Derg. 2003, 14, 153–159. [Google Scholar]
- Orkibi, H.; Feniger-Schaal, R. Integrative systematic review of psychodrama psychotherapy research: Trends and methodological implications. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, 0212575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kipper, D.A.; Ritchie, T.D. The Effectiveness of Psychodramatic Techniques: A Meta-Analysis. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 2003, 7, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Buchanan, D.R. Psychodrama: A humanistic approach to psychiatric treatment for the elderly. Hosp. Community Psychiatry 1982, 33, 220–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wieser, M.A. Die Meta-Analyse zur Psychodrama-Psychotherapie in “Psychotherapie im Wandel” von Grawe, Donati und Bernauer. Psychother. Forum 2006, 14, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castelo, P.; Blesa, H.; de Oliveira, C.; Soares, L. Produção de artigos em Psicodrama no Brasil: Revisão sistemática (1996–2014) Production of Brazilian Psychodrama Articles: Systematic Review (1996–2014). Rev. Bras. Psicodrama 2015, 23, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wieser, M.A. Studies on Treatment Effects of Psychodrama Therapy Ordered on the Basis of ICD-10. In Psychodrama: Advances in Theory and Practice; Baim, C., Burmeister, J., Maciel, M., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 271–292. [Google Scholar]
- Cruz, A.; Sales, C.M.D.; Alves, P.; Moita, G. The Core Techniques of Morenian Psychodrama: A Systematic Review of Literature. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Ding, F.; Chen, D.; Zhang, X.; Shen, K.; Fan, Y.; Li, L. Intervention effect of psychodrama on depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis based on Chinese samples. Arts Psychother. 2020, 69, 101661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kellermann, P.F. Outcome research in classical psychodrama. Small Group Res. 1987, 18, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kipper, D.A. Trends in the research on the effectiveness of psychodrama: Retrospect and prospect. Group Psychother. Psychodrama Sociom. 1978, 31, 5–18. [Google Scholar]
- D’Amato, R.C.; Dean, R.S. Psychodrama research-therapy and theory: A critical analysis of an arrested modality. Psychol. Sch. 1988, 25, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puetz, T.W.; Morley, C.A.; Herring, M.P. Effects of Creative Arts Therapies on Psychological Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients with Cancer. Jama Intern. Med. 2013, 173, 960–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fortin, I.; Meilleur, D. Aménagement du cadre dans la psychothérapie psychanalytique de groupe auprès des adolescents: Regard sur la littérature des 30 dernières années. The framework set up in psychoanalytic group therapy with teenager: A review of the literature of the last 30 years. Neuropsychiatr L’Enfance L’Adolescence 2013, 61, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruddy, R.A.; Dent-Brown, K. Drama therapy for schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soo, S.; Moayyedi, P.; Deeks, J.J.; Delaney, B.; Lewis, M.; Forman, D. WITHDRAWN: Psychological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orkibi, H.; Azoulay, B.; Snir, S.; Regev, D. Adolescents’ Dramatic Engagement Predicts their In-Session Productive Behaviors: A Psychodrama Change Process Study. Arts Psychother. 2017, 55, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrow, G.S. The effects of psychodrama group therapy on role behavior of schizophrenic patients. Group Psychother. 1951, 3, 316–320. [Google Scholar]
- Saúl, L.Á.; López-González, M.A.; Moreno-Pulido, A.; Corbella, S.; Compañ, V.; Feixas, G. Bibliometric Review of the Repertory Grid Technique: 1998–2007. J. Constr. Psychol. 2012, 25, 112–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubio-Garay, F.; López-González, M.A.; Amor, P.J.; Carrasco, M.A. Prevalencia de la Violencia en el Noviazgo: Una Revisión Sistemática. The Prevalence of Dating Violence: A systematic Review. Psychol. Pap. 2017, 38, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Montesano, A.; López-González, M.A.; Saúl, L.Á.; Feixas, G. A review of cognitive conflicts research: A meta-analytic study of prevalence and relation to symptoms. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2015, 11, 2997–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Urrútia, G.; Bonfill, X. Declaración PRISMA: Una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Med. Clínica 2010, 135, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A.; Group, P.-P. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martín, J.L.R.; Garces, A.T.; Seoane, T. Revisiones Sistemáticas en las Ciencias de la Vida. El Concepto Salud a Través de la Síntesis de la Evidencia Científica; Fiscam: Castilla-La Mancha, Spain, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Meca, J.; Marín-Martínez, F.; López-López, J.A. Meta-análisis e intervención psicosocial basada en la evidencia [Meta-analysis and evidence based psychosocial intervention]. Psychosoc. Interv. 2011, 20, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Munn, Z.; Stern, C.; Aromataris, E.; Lockwood, C.; Jordan, Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2018, 18, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rousseau, C.; Beauregard, C.; Daignault, K.; Petrakos, H.; Thombs, B.D.; Steele, R.; Vasiliadis, H.M.; Hechtman, L. A cluster randomized-controlled trial of a classroom-based drama workshop program to improve mental health outcomes among immigrant and refugee youth in special classes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Styła, R. Differences in effectiveness of intensive treatment programmes for neurotic and personality disorders. Is it worth monitoring effectiveness of a therapeutic team? Psychiatr. Pol. 2014, 48, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aytemur, Z.A.; Pişmişoǧlu, B.; Kilinç, O.; Pişmişoǧlu, E.; Hacievliyagil, S.S.; Karaman, C. Intensive clinic intervention plus psychodrama in smoking cessation and effects on cessation outcome. Turk. Klin. J. Med Sci. 2012, 32, 630–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Treadwell, T.W.; Reisch, E.E.; Travaglini, L.E.; Kumar, V.K. The effectiveness of collaborative story building and telling in facilitating group cohesion in a college classroom setting. Int. J. Group Psychother. 2011, 61, 502–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oğuzhanoğlu, N.K.; Sözeri-Varma, G.; Karadağ, F.; Tümkaya, S.; Efe, M.; Kıroğlu, Y. Prefrontal cortex neurochemical metabolite levels in major depression and the effects of treatment: An HMRS study. Turk. J. Psychiatry 2014, 25, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, D.W.; Pressley-Mcgruder, G.; Jones, V.F.; Potter, D.; Rowland, M.; Currie, M.; Gale, B. Evaluation of an innovative tool for child sexual abuse education. J. Child Sex. Abuse 2013, 22, 379–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kipper, D.A.; Giladi, D. Effectiveness of Structured Psychodrama and Systematic Desensitization in Reducing Test Anxiety. J. Couns. Psychol. 1978, 25, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beauvais, A.M.; Özbaş, A.A.; Wheeler, K. End-of-life psychodrama: Influencing nursing students’ communication skills, attitudes, emotional intelligence and self-reflection. J. Psyc. Nurs. 2019, 10, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, E.M.; Antonio, R.; Soares, M.B.; Moreno, J.L. Psychodramatic psychotherapy combined with pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder: An open and naturalistic study. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. 2006, 28, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ragsdale, K.G.; Cox, R.D.; Finn, P.; Eisler, R.M. Effectiveness of short-term specialized inpatient treatment for war-related posttraumatic stress disorder: A role for adventure-based counseling and psychodrama. J. Trauma Stress. 1996, 9, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wells, G.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomized Studies in Meta-Analyses; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, B.H.; Ciliska, D.; Dobbins, M.; Micucci, S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: Providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 2004, 1, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dehnavi, S.; Bajelan, M.; Pardeh, S.J.; Khodaviren, H.; Dehnavi, Z. The Effectiveness of Psychodrama in Improving Quality of Life among Opiate-dependent Male Patients. Int. J. Med Res. Health Sci. 2016, 5, 243–247. [Google Scholar]
- Karataş, Z. Investigating the Effects of Group Practice Performed using Psychodrama Techniques on Adolescents’ conflict Resolution Skills. Kuram Uygul. Eğitim Bilimleri 2011, 11, 609–614. [Google Scholar]
- Gatta, M.; Lara, D.Z.; Lara, D.C.; Andrea, S.; Paolo, T.C.; Giovanni, C.; PierAntonio, B. Analytical psychodrama with adolescents suffering from psycho-behavioral disorder: Short-term effects on psychiatric symptoms. Arts Psychother. 2010, 37, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dogan, T. The effects of psychodrama on young adults’ attachment styles. Arts Psychother. 2010, 37, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singal, S. The efficacy of psychodrama in the treatment of oppositional and defiant adolescents. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Sproesser, E.; Viana, M.A.; Quagliato, E.; de Souza, E. The effect of psychotherapy in patients with PD: A controlled study. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2010, 16, 298–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karataş, Z.; Gökçakan, Z. A Comparative Investigation of the Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Group Practices and Psychodrama on Adolescent Aggression. Kuram Uygul. Eğitim Bilimleri 2009, 9, 1441–1452. [Google Scholar]
- Karataş, Z.; Gökçakan, Z. The Effect of Group-Based Psychodrama Therapy on Decreasing the Level of Aggression in Adolescents. Turk. Psikiyatr. Derg. 2009, 20, 357–366. [Google Scholar]
- Smokowski, P.R.; Bacallao, M. Entre Dos Mundos/Between two Worlds Youth violence Prevention comparing Psychodramatic and Support Group Delivery Formats. Small Group Res. 2009, 40, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carbonell, D.M.; Parteleno-Barehmi, C. Psychodrama Groups for Girls Coping with Trauma. Int. J. Group Psychother. 1999, 49, 285–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kähönen, K.; Muotka, J.; Näätänen, P.; Salmela-Aro, K. Psykologinen hyvinvointi työuupuneiden ryhmäpsykoterapeuttisessa intervetiossa Psychological well-being in a group psychotherapy intervention for employees with burnout. Psykologia 2016, 51, 262–273. [Google Scholar]
- Özbaş, A.A.; Tel, H. The effect of a psychological empowerment program based on psychodrama on empowerment perception and burnout levels in oncology nurses: Psychological empowerment in oncology nurses. Palliat. Supportive Care 2016, 14, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kähönen, K.; Naatanen, P.; Tolvanen, A.; Salmela-Aro, K. Development of sense of coherence during two group interventions. Scand. J. Psychol. 2012, 53, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dogan, T. The effects of the psychodrama in instilling empathy and self-awareness: A pilot study. PsyCh J. 2018, 7, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karataş, Z. Effects of Psychodrama Practice on University Students’ Subjective Well-Being and Hopelessness. Eğitim Bilim 2014, 39, 117–128. [Google Scholar]
- Lopez-Gonzalez, M.A. Evaluación de la actividad científica de la técnica psicológica de la rejilla a través de indicadores bibliométricos. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Gratacós Torras, M.; Pousa Tomàs, E. Interventions to Improve Therapeutic Adherence in Subjects with Schizophrenia. Psychol. Pap. 2018, 39, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Litwińska-Rączka, K. Jacob Levy Moreno’s Psychodrama as a Work Technique For Treating Patients in Group and Individual Psychotherapy. Curr. Probl. Psychiatry 2018, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shearon, E.M. Psychodrama with children. Acta Paedopsychiatr. 1980, 45, 253–268. [Google Scholar]
- Ron, Y. Psychodrama’s Role in Alleviating Acute Distress: A Case Study of an Open Therapy Group in a Psychiatric Inpatient Ward. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, e2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foulkes, S.H. Therapeutic Group Analysis; Karnac Books: London, UK, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Okamoto, A. Psychodrama as a form of psychotherapy: Identifying trends of psychodrama practices among practitioners in the US. Ph.D. Thesis, Alliant International University, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Amatruda, M.-J. Conflict Resolution and Social Skill Development with Children. J. Group Psychother. Psychodrama Sociom. 2006, 58, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maslach, C.; Jackson, S.E. MBI: Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual; University of California, Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Ozturkcu, O.S.K.; Sertoz, O.O.; Gokengin, G.B.; Sagin, H.; Gulbahar, O.; Ciceklioglu, M. Is it possible to decrease the burnout level of hospital office staff by communication skills training using therapy techniques? Dusunen Adam 2018, 31, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gökkaya, F.; Özdel, O. The effectiveness of psychodrama therapy in reducing school counselors’ occupational burnout. Anadolu Psikiyatr. Derg. 2016, 17, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenzel, A.; Berchick, E.R.; Tenhave, T.; Halberstadt, S.; Brown, G.K.; Beck, A.T. Predictors of suicide relative to other deaths in patients with suicide attempts and suicide ideation: A 30-year prospective study. J. Affect. Disord. 2011, 132, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nicholas, M.W. The Use of Psychodrama and Sociometry Techniques in Psychodynamic and Other Process Groups. Int. J. Group Psychother. 2017, 67, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fernández-Ballesteros, R. Los autoinformes [self-report inventories]. In Introducción a la Evaluación Psicológica; Pirámide: Madrid, Spain, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Boutron, I.; Altman, D.G.; Moher, D.; Schulz, K.F.; Ravaud, P.; CONSORT NPT Group. CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts. Ann. Intern. Med. 2017, 167, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jendričko, T.; Prosen, S. Expectations and perception of the psychotherapy process and outcome. Psychotherapeutic factors and the psychodrama specificities in psychodrama group participants at a psychiatric hospital. Z. Psychodrama Soziom. 2020, 19, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kushnir, A.; Orkibi, H. Concretization as a Mechanism of Change in Psychodrama: Procedures and Benefits. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, S.F. A Review of Psychodrama and Group Process. Int. J. Soc. Work Hum. Serv. Pract. 2013, 1, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Year | Authors | Affiliation | Country | Doc. Type | Journal | Quality Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1999 | Carbonell, Dina M. | Bridgewater State University | USA | Article | International Journal of Group Psychotherapy | SJR (99) = Q2: 0.429. |
Parteleno-Barehmi, Ceil | Wheelock College, Boston | |||||
2003 | Singal, Sally | McGill University | Canada | Thesis | ||
2009a | Karataş, Zeynep | Mehmet Akif Ersoy University | Turkey | Article | Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice | SJR (09) = Q4: 0.111. |
Gökçakan, Zafer | Mersin University | |||||
2009b | Karataş, Zeynep | Mehmet Akif Ersoy University | Turkey | Article | Turkish Journal of Psychiatry | |
Gökçakan, Zafer | Mersin University | |||||
2009 | Smokowski, Paul R. | U. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | USA | Article | Small Group Research | SJR (09) = Q2: 0.763. JCR (09) = 0.683 |
Bacallao, Martica | U. of North Carolina at Greensboro | |||||
2010 | Dogan, Turkan | University of Baskent | Turkey | Article | Arts in Psychotherapy | SJR (10) = Q3: 0.256. JCR (10) = 0.609 |
2010 | Gatta, Michela | University of Padua | Italy | Article | Arts in Psychotherapy | SJR (10) = Q3: 0.256. JCR (10) = 0.609 |
Lara, Dal Zotto | University of Padua | |||||
Lara, Del Col | ULSS 16 Padua | |||||
Andrea, Spoto | University of Padua | |||||
Paolo, Testa Costantino | ULSS 16 Padua | |||||
Giovanni, Ceranto | ULSS 16 Padua | |||||
Rosaria, Sorgato | ULSS 16 Padua | |||||
Carolina, Bonafede | ULSS 16 Padua | |||||
Pier Antoni, Battistella | ULSS 16 Padua | |||||
2010 | Sproesser, Erika | University of Campinas | Brazil | Article | Parkinsonism and Related Disorders | SJR (09) = Q1: 1.05. JCR (09) = 2.406 |
Viana, Maura A. | ||||||
Quagliato, Elizabet M.A.B. | ||||||
de Souza, Elisabete A. P. | ||||||
2011 | Karataş, Zeynep | Mehmet Akif Ersoy University | Turkey | Article | Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice | SJR (11) = Q3: 0.200. |
2012 | Kähönen, Kari | University of Jyväskyla | Finland | Article | Personality and Social Psychology | SJR (12) = Q1: 5.689. JCR (12) = 4.877 |
Naatanen, Petri | University of Jyväskyla | |||||
Tolvanen, Asko | University Central Hospital | |||||
Salmela-Aro, Katariina | University of Helsinki | |||||
2014 | Karataş, Zeynep | Mehmet Akif Ersoy University | Turkey | Article | Eğitim ve Bilim | SJR (14) = Q3: 0.276. |
2016 | Dehnavi, Saeed | Islamic Azad University | Iran | Article | International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences | |
Bajelan, Mahin | ||||||
Pardeh, Setareh Javaher | ||||||
Khodaviren, Hamideh | ||||||
Dehnavi, Zahra | ||||||
2016 | Kähönen, Kari | University of Jyväskyla | Finland | Article | Psykologia | |
Muotka, Joona | University of Jyväskyla | |||||
Näätänen, Petri | University of Jyväskyla | |||||
Salmela-Aro, Katariina | University of Helsinki | |||||
2016 | Özbaş, Azize Atli | Hacettepe University | Turkey | Article | Palliative and Supportive Care | SJR (16) = Q2: 0.500. JCR (16) = 1.199 |
Tel, Havva | Cumhuriyet University | |||||
Azoulay, Bracha | University of Haifa | |||||
Snir, Sharon | Tel Hai College | |||||
Regev, Dafna | University of Haifa | |||||
2018 | Dogan, Turkan | Hacettepe University | Turkey | Article | PsyCh Journal | SJR (18) = Q3: 0.401. JCR (18) = 0.717 |
Authors | Year | G1 | SD | G2 | Ca | G3 | G4 | G5 | Wa | Wb | G6 | Ia | Ib | Aa | Ab | Ac | GG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carbonelly and Parteleno-Barehmi | 1999 | ++ | RCT | +++ | No | +++ | ++ | +++ | Yes | 82% | +++ | 93% | Yes | Middle School | Yes | Yes | +++ |
Singal | 2003 | +++ | RCT | +++ | No | +++ | ++ | +++ | Yes | 100% | +++ | 100% | Yes | High School | Yes | Yes | +++ |
Karataş and Gökçakan | 2009a | ++ | RCT | +++ | No | +++ | ++ | +++ | Yes | 97.2% | +++ | 96.0% | CT | High School | Yes | Yes | +++ |
Karataş and Gökçakan | 2009b | +++ | RCT | +++ | No | +++ | + | +++ | Yes | 95.8% | +++ | 91.6% | Yes | High School | Yes | Yes | ++ |
Smokowski and Bacallao | 2009 | +++ | RCT | +++ | No | +++ | ++ | +++ | Yes | CT | ++ | CT | Yes | Latino communities | Yes | Yes | +++ |
Dogan, | 2010 | + | RCT | +++ | CT | +++ | ++ | +++ | Yes | 65% | ++ | 69% | CT | University | Yes | Yes | ++ |
Gatta et al. | 2010 | + | q-RCT | +++ | No | +++ | + | +++ | Yes | 100% | +++ | 100% | Yes | Public Health Services | Yes | Yes | ++ |
Sproesser et al. | 2010 | ++ | RCT | +++ | CT | +++ | ++ | +++ | Yes | 100% | +++ | 100% | CT | University Hospital | Yes | No | +++ |
Karataş | 2011 | + | RCT | +++ | No | +++ | ++ | +++ | Yes | 100% | +++ | 100% | CT | High School | Yes | Yes | ++ |
Kähönen et al. | 2012 | ++ | RCT | +++ | CT | + | ++ | +++ | Yes | 82% | +++ | 79% | CT | Healthcare Service | Yes | Yes | ++ |
Karataş | 2014 | ++ | RCT | +++ | No | +++ | ++ | +++ | Yes | 100% | +++ | 100% | Yes | University | Yes | Yes | +++ |
Dehnavi et al. | 2016 | ++ | RCT | +++ | CT | +++ | ++ | +++ | Yes | CT | + | CT | CT | Addiction Treatment Clinic | Yes | No | ++ |
Kähönen et. al. | 2016 | ++ | RCT | +++ | CT | + | ++ | +++ | Yes | 100% | +++ | 100% | CT | Occupational Health Care | Yes | Yes | ++ |
Özbas and Tel | 2016 | ++ | RCT | +++ | No | +++ | + | +++ | Yes | 90% | +++ | 78.9% | Yes | University Hospital | Yes | Yes | ++ |
Dogan | 2018 | +++ | RCT | +++ | CT | + | ++ | +++ | Yes | 100% | +++ | 100% | Yes | University | Yes | Yes | +++ |
Study | Sample | SD | Session Structure | Treatment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | Age | |||||||||||
w | m | NSD | TNS | IBS | LOI | EG | (n) | CG | (n) | |||
Carbonell y Parteleno-Barehmi, 1999 [70] | 26 | 0 | 11–13 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | 20 | PD | (12) | WL | (14) |
Singal, 2003 [65] | 18 | 6 | 12–17 | 60–120′ | 1 | 12 | 7 | 12 | PD | (13) | WL | (11) |
Karataş y Gökçakan, 2009a [67] | 13 | 23 | 13–14 | 90–120′ | 1 | 14 | 7 | 14 | PD CBT | (12) (12) | CG | (12) |
Karataş y Gökçakan, 2009b [68] | 12 | 11 | 13–14 | 90–120′ | 1 | 14 | 7 | 14 | PD | (11) | CG | (12) |
Smokowski y Bacallao, 2009 [69] | 54 | 27 | 14 | 180′ | 1 | 8 | 7 | 8 | PD | (56) | SG | (25) |
Dogan, 2010 [64] | 15 | 5 | 23–29 | 120′ | 1 | 12 | 7 | 12 | PD | (11) | CG | (09) |
Gatta et al., 2010 [63] | 4 | 8 | 15–18 | 75′ | 1 | 12 | 7 | 12 | PPD | (06) | CG | (06) |
Sproesser et al., 2010 [66] | 7 | 9 | 49–53 | 90′ | 1 | 12 | 15 | 24 | PD | (08) | WL | (08) |
Karataş, 2011 [62] | 18 | 18 | 14–17 | 90–120′ | 1 | 10 | 7 | 10 | PD | (12) | CG IG | (12) (12) |
Kähönen et al., 2012 [73] | 70 | 24 | 31–59 | 90′ | 4 | 64 | 15 | 32 | PD AG | (30) (32) | CG | (32) |
Karataş, 2014 [75] | 45 | N.A. | 90–120′ | 1 | 12 | 7 | 12 | PD | (15) | CG PG | (15) (15) | |
Dehnavi et al., 2016 [61] | 0 | 30 | 20–52 | 120′ | 1 | 12 | N.A. | 6 | PD | (15) | CG | (15) |
Kähönen et. al., 2016 [71] | 70 | 24 | 33–59 | 90′ | 4 | 64 | 15 | 32 | PD AG | (30) (32) | CG | (32) |
Özbas y Tel, 2016 [72] | 82 | 0 | 18–37 | 120′ | 1 | 10 | 7 | 10 | PD | (38) | CG | (44) |
Dogan, 2018 [74] | 22 | 1 | 23–39 | 180′ | 1 | 12 | 7 | 12 | PD | (14) | CG | (09) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
López-González, M.A.; Morales-Landazábal, P.; Topa, G. Psychodrama Group Therapy for Social Issues: A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094442
López-González MA, Morales-Landazábal P, Topa G. Psychodrama Group Therapy for Social Issues: A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(9):4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094442
Chicago/Turabian StyleLópez-González, M. Angeles, Pedro Morales-Landazábal, and Gabriela Topa. 2021. "Psychodrama Group Therapy for Social Issues: A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 9: 4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094442
APA StyleLópez-González, M. A., Morales-Landazábal, P., & Topa, G. (2021). Psychodrama Group Therapy for Social Issues: A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094442