Next Article in Journal
Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Volleyball Athletes Following a COVID-19 Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
First Insight into Nutraceutical Properties of Local Salento Cichorium intybus Varieties: NMR-Based Metabolomic Approach
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Thallium Contamination of Drinking Water: Health Implications in a Residential Cohort Study in Tuscany (Italy)

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(8), 4058; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084058
by Daniela Nuvolone 1,*, Davide Petri 1, Maria Cristina Aprea 2, Silvano Bertelloni 3, Fabio Voller 1 and Ida Aragona 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(8), 4058; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084058
Submission received: 10 March 2021 / Revised: 25 March 2021 / Accepted: 9 April 2021 / Published: 12 April 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript aimed to assess the medium- to long-term health effects of chronic exposure to low to medium levels of thallium, through  the reconstruction of residential histories and data from administrative health database. The sampling startegy as well methods used for data analysis were well detailed in a step wise way. However the manuscripts can still be improved by addressing these comments:

. The keywords must be arranged alphabetically

. In the discussion section the relevant literature must be used to support related results from the study, however some parts of the discussion reads more like a literature review than discussion section.

.The conclusion could be better improved by highlighting the main findings in the discussion rather the conclusion being written in a generic manner.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

 

Reviewer 2 Report

Line 13: Change the word “activated”

L15”  with that of those” rephrase it

L36: add its before levels

L36-38: It needs to be rephrased

L46” bones, kidneys and nervous system.” Any reference? Example?

L194: “15940 men and 17768” show by percentage

Table 1: show the population number as % not by numbers, what the Person-Years means? I recommend showing the 0 years old by less than 1

The person in years does not make sense to me. DO you mean 18900 kids enter to the municipality? If entered what's the relation with thallium

What d you mean by” Socio-economic status “ It is not clear

Table 3 is not clear. Authors must clean the table with two decimal and removing irrelevant disease or infrequent cases. This applies to all other tables as well.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

 

Reviewer 3 Report

This is a high quality manuscript. However, the section "Discussion" can be divided into several subsections.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Back to TopTop