Next Article in Journal
Access to Dental Care—A Survey from Dentists, People with Disabilities and Caregivers
Previous Article in Journal
Safe by Design Regulation for Academic Experimentation and Value Conflicts: An Exploration of Solution Directions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Health Studies in the Context of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining: A Scoping Review

1
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
2
University of Basel, P.O. Box, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland
3
Manhiça Health Research Centre, C.P. 1929 Maputo, Mozambique
4
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, P.O. Box, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
5
Faculty of Medicine, University Eduardo Mondlane, C.P. 257 Maputo, Mozambique
6
National Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, C.P. 264 Maputo, Mozambique
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(4), 1555; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041555
Submission received: 31 December 2020 / Revised: 25 January 2021 / Accepted: 3 February 2021 / Published: 6 February 2021

Abstract

:
Artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) is an important livelihood activity in many low- and middle-income countries. It is widely acknowledged that there are a myriad of health risk and opportunities associated with ASM. However, little is known with regard to which aspects of health have been studied in ASM settings. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed publications, using readily available electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) from inception to 14 July 2020. Relevant information was synthesized with an emphasis on human and environmental exposures and health effects in a context of ASM. Our search yielded 2764 records. After systematic screening, 176 health studies from 38 countries were retained for final analysis. Most of the studies (n = 155) focused on health in ASM extracting gold. While many of the studies included the collection of environmental and human samples (n = 154), only few (n = 30) investigated infectious diseases. Little attention was given to vulnerable groups, such as women of reproductive age and children. Our scoping review provides a detailed characterisation of health studies in ASM contexts. Future research in ASM settings should address health more comprehensively, including the potential spread of infectious diseases, and effects on mental health and well-being.

1. Introduction

Artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) is commonly defined as any mining activity of ore deposits that are considered not cost-effective for large-scale industrial extraction [1]. Although cross-country distinctions between artisanal mining and small-scale mining exist, both share a number of common characteristics [2]. For example, both artisanal mining and small-scale mining are activities predominantly pursued by the informal sector, usually involving a few to hundreds of individuals using basic equipment [3]. Consideration of health and safety measures in ASM working processes are low [3,4,5,6]. It is currently estimated that ASM activities are practiced by more than 40 million people in over 120 countries [4,7,8]. Most of the activities are concentrated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Africa, Asia, and the Americas [4,5]. Driven by a number of factors (e.g., demand for minerals, gold price, and poverty), the ASM sector shows a significant diversity in various dimensions: (i) demography (up to 50% of miners are women and 10% are children); (ii) origin of miners (mix of local communities and migrant mine workers); (iii) seasonality (e.g., rush mining due to discovery of new mineral deposits, resulting in rapid in-migration); (iv) legal status (e.g., 70–80% of ASM are informal in many countries); and (v) targeted commodities (e.g., gold, cobalt, coltan, and diamond) [7,8,9]. Despite the informal nature of activities, ASM represents a considerable share in global minerals and gemstones extraction. For instance, approximately half of the ASM miners are working in gold mines with a share of 20% of the global gold supply [2,8]. In addition to gold, ASM has a considerable global share in the supply of sapphire (80%), tantalum (26%), tin (25%), and diamonds (20%) [8]. Taken together, ASM is an important economic activity that provides livelihood opportunities for an estimated 80–150 million people [10,11].
Worldwide, ASM activities are on the rise. The activities are associated with both risks and opportunities for the health of miners, their families, surrounding communities, and populations living up- and downstream from ASM sites [2,5,12]. For instance, ASM can induce changes in people’s socio-economic status and potentially reduce poverty, and improve their ability to access health care and education [13,14]. Income from ASM employment may reduce food insecurity [15] and improve housing conditions, which may result in reduced transmission of vector-borne diseases, such as malaria [16] and improved respiratory health [17]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that health and environmental benefits may be achieved, should governments and other key players formalise the ASM sector, provide financial assistance, promote improved technologies, educate on environmental protection, and encourage artisanal miners to form associations [18,19].
However, positive effects on health associated with ASM activities are often overshadowed by negative impacts. It is interesting to note that concerns about risks associated with occupational exposures in mining settings have already been raised in the 17th century by Ramazzini [20]. More than two centuries later, the exposure of surrounding communities to diseases related to mining was reaffirmed by Rose [21] and Cole [22]. Today, ASM is still expanding and generally presents as a highly labour-intensive activity with low health and safety standards in place [23], exposing the ASM workforce—often including women of reproductive age and children [6,9,12]—to a range of chemical, physical, biological, biomechanical, and psychosocial hazards [5,12,24], frequently resulting in “rapid development of disease and premature death” [21]. In addition to the occupational environment, ASM-related health hazards also affect surrounding communities, including particularly vulnerable groups (e.g., children, women of reproductive age, and elderly) [2,8,25]. Indeed, health effects related to chemical exposure, such as mercury (Hg), cobalt (Co), arsenic (As), and lead (Pb), including neurological, renal, and autoimmune disorders, have been reported in occupationally and non-occupationally exposed individuals in ASM settings [24,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Moreover, mining-induced in-migration and changing life styles pose considerable health risks affecting miners and exposed communities [2,8,12,33,34].
Taken together, it is widely acknowledged that ASM activities affect human health in myriad direct and indirect ways. However, little is known about how exactly people’s health and well-being are affected by ASM contexts in different parts of the world. To our knowledge, most health-related research on ASM settings have focused on gold extraction (i.e., ASGM) and associated exposures to Hg [23,35,36,37,38,39]. Indeed, a considerable body of evidence is available on environmental and human exposure to Hg in ASGM contexts [24,29,35]. At the same time, many other health hazards and risks are likely to prevail in the context of ASM that received far less attention [40]. Similarly, health risks that are ubiquitous across any type of ASM might have been studied more frequently in ASGM context, as compared to effects that are specific to other minerals being extracted in ASM [23]. For example, few studies pertaining to health effects in ASM contexts have tempted to include exploitation other than gold, such as artisanal fluvial extraction of river sand and informal gasoline trade [40]. An overview of health studies in the context of ASM will not only enhance the understanding of which health aspects have been studied thus far, but will also allow to identify potential research gaps that can guide future research efforts in ASM.
This paper aims to provide a global overview of human health-related studies that have been carried out in ASM contexts, placing particular emphasis on those directly engaged in ASM activities, as well as those living within mining areas and surrounding populations. The research was guided by the following questions: (i) in which countries have ASM activities been conducted and what type of ASM contexts have been studied? (ii) What health effects and ASM-related exposures to health hazards (environmental or biomarkers) were studied? (iii) Which population groups were included in these studies? (iv) What type of environmental and human samples were collected? (v) What type of exposures were measured? (vi) Which signs, symptoms, diseases, injuries, and fatalities were investigated?

2. Materials and Methods

A scoping review was conducted targeting the peer-reviewed literature [41]. The search was oriented towards, but not limited to, epidemiological studies that investigated health issues such as communicable and non-communicable diseases, signs and symptoms, injuries, and fatalities in ASM contexts. Established health indices such as human biomonitoring (HBM), health risk assessment (HRA), and risk analysis (RA) that were applied in ASM settings, were also considered. Studies that were carried out in industrial mining contexts were deliberately not included in the current scoping review, as our focus was on ASM.

2.1. Search Terms and Strategy

Relevant studies were identified through a systematic search guided by the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation” [42]. Two steps were taken to develop the search terminology. First, the search terms were independently developed as an iterative process by two reviewers (H.C. and R.S.). Second, the two draft search terms were compared and consolidated into a final search strategy. Any disagreement was discussed with another two researchers (A.L. and M.S.W.). The final search strategy (in English only) consisted of two search term blocks: (i) ASMs related and (ii) health effects related terms (see Appendix A, Table A1).

2.2. Peer-Reviewed Literature Searches and Screening

We conducted the electronic literature search applying a systematic search strategy in three readily available electronic databases, namely (i) PubMed; (ii) Scopus; and (iii) Web of Science (WoS). No spatial, temporal, or language restriction was applied for the search term administered on 14 July 2020. The records retrieved from the three databases were pooled together and imported into EndNote version X9.2 (Thomson Reuters Corp.; New York City, NY, USA; https://endnote.com). Of note, the search strategy was amended to the specific features of the databases (see Appendix A, Table A1).
In a first step, records were de-duplicated based on authorship, title, and publication year of the articles identified in the different databases. For this purpose, automatic detection and hand curation was done using both EndNote and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office Standard 2016, version 16.0.4266.1001; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). In a second step, all records other than original research papers and reviews were excluded (i.e., conference proceedings, books, book chapters, editorials, opinion pieces, patents, and correspondences) using the reference type field in the EndNote software. In a third step, titles and abstracts of all records were independently screened by four reviewers, including three authors (H.C., P.A., and R.S.) and one collaborator (A.G.) using EndNote and Microsoft Excel for data management. Discrepancies were discussed in pairs (H.C.-R.S., H.C.-A.G., and H.C.-P.A.) until consensus was reached, if need be with input of an additional author (M.S.W.).
The remaining full texts were screened uniquely by H.C. with support, whenever needed, from M.S.W., applying the following set of inclusion criteria for the final selection of the relevant articles: (i) study was carried out in an ASM environment or an environment affected by ASM; (ii) study investigated human health outcomes and/or human health related indicators (environmental samples or human biomarkers); (iii) the articles is open access or accessible with the rights of the University of Basel (Basel, Switzerland). A post hoc approach for inclusion criteria was applied in order to focus on the comparison of quantitative epidemiological studies solely conducted in the context of ASM. Hence, qualitative studies, systematic reviews, and studies focusing on both ASM and other (illegal/informal) activities, such as farming and electronic waste recycling, were excluded for the current scoping review.

2.3. Data Extraction and Analysis

Two authors (H.C. and M.S.W.) developed the data charting form in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet for data extraction with the following variables: articles’ background data (author, year of publication, country, study type, study design, and natural resources extracted); characteristics of study population (age, age group, sex, and population groups); type of health-related samples taken (environmental samples and related pollutants, and human samples and related biomarkers); investigated health issues (signs and symptoms related to chemical exposures; adverse health conditions, and fatalities); and health risk indices (HRI), i.e., health indicators calculated to quantify human health risks associated with the environmental hazards [43,44]. Online electronic supplementary materials of included articles were accessed and screened for additional data extraction whenever necessary. Data extraction based on the full-text analysis was mostly driven by one researcher (H.C.). Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office Standard 2016, version 16.0.4266.1001, Microsoft Corporation; Redmond, WA, USA) was used for data entry and cleaning, and subsequently imported into STATA (Stata Corporation, version 14.2, LLC; College Station, TX, USA) for data analysis. Drawing on the concept put forth by Levac and colleagues [41], a descriptive thematic approach was used to characterise the included articles. Identified categories were summarised as frequencies and continuous variables as median and interquartile range (IQR). In cases where the characterisation of the articles refers to a sub-group of the total number of articles identified, the nominator (number of articles of interest [x]), denominator (total number of relevant articles [y]), and percentage (%; [x/y]) are specified in the results section. The number of studies per country were compiled using Microsoft Excel and exported into QGIS (version 3.14.0-Pi, Free Software Foundation, Inc.; Boston, MA, USA; https://qgis.org/en/site/) for illustration. In case multiple countries were reported in a single article, countries were counted separately. Similarly, the type of extracted commodities and number of reporting studies were compiled using Microsoft Excel. When more than one commodity was reported, a separate counting was done for each. PowerPoint (Microsoft Office Standard 2016, version 16.0.4266.1001, Microsoft Corporation; Redmond, WA, USA), was used for edition and final illustration of all figures.

3. Results

3.1. Overview of Studies

We identified a total of 2764 records based on PubMed, Scopus, and WoS. After de-duplication (1176 removed records), 1588 unique studies remained from which 1412 were excluded based on reference type (n = 289), title and abstract screening (n = 987), and full text screening (n = 136). Hence, 176 articles were deemed eligible for data extraction and analysis, as shown in the PRISMA flow chart (Figure 1). All articles included were in English with the exception of two that were in Spanish.

3.2. Study Characterization Regarding Country and Year of Publication

Panel A in Figure 2 shows the geographical distribution of the 176 included articles that present primary (n = 167) and secondary (n = 26) data from 38 countries. Most of the studies were conducted in Africa (n = 95; 16 countries), followed by Asia (n = 53; 10 countries) and Latin America and the Caribbean (n = 50; 11 countries). Only one study involved individuals from a European country [45]. The number of published articles per country ranged from 1 to 32. Ghana is the country with the largest number of published articles (n = 32).
While most of the studies focused on a single country (93.8% [165/176]), studies including more than one country (i.e., multi-centric studies) accounted for 6.2% [11/176]. Multi-centric studies involved two to five countries from Africa (n = 2), Africa and Asia (n = 8), and South America and Europe (n = 1).
The oldest paper identified was published in 1998 (Figure 2, Panel B). The median (IQR) of articles per year was 5 (range: 2–13). Two thirds of the articles (67% [118/176]) were published between 2015 and 2020, indicating an increasing trend in peer-reviewed ASM-related published articles in the last 5 years.

3.3. Study Characteristics Regarding Key Topics Covered

Of the 176 included health studies, most were related to HBM (n = 32), HRA (n = 30), and human health assessment (n = 26). Few studies (n = 4) presented medical case reports (Figure 3). The remaining studies were related to integrated approaches, comprising HBM and health assessment (HA) (n = 68), HA and HRA (n = 9), HBM, HRA and HA (n = 6) and HRA and HBM (n = 1). Of note, three out of four medical case reports were related to both HBM and HA [47,48,49].
A high diversity of types of health studies was observed (Figure 4). Based on the extracted data, we examined how included studies (n = 176) assessed health-related exposure and health effects from ASM activities. The following study type clusters were identified: (i) HA (i.e., medical investigation, n = 113); (ii) HBM (n = 110); (iii) HRA studies (n = 46); and (iv) medical case reports (n = 4). A large number of articles (n = 71) applied integrated environmental monitoring (EM) approaches, applying different combinations of HBM, HA, and HRA.
Exposure assessments were performed through examination of human samples, environmental samples (including biotic and food samples), and self-reported exposure through questionnaires. In all studies, samples were submitted to laboratory examination for chemical and biological hazards exposure assessment. Physical hazards exposure was mainly assessed through questionnaires and field observations. Of note, most of HRA studies (n = 45) investigated chemical hazard exposure, including heavy metals, metalloids, and trace elements.
In regards to the strategies applied for investigating health outcomes from ASM exposure, a broad range of approaches were employed (Figure 4). For instance, HBM studies were more focused on the level of internal body exposure to chemical hazards (e.g., Hg). Signs, symptoms, diseases, injuries, and fatalities were reported in the remaining study type clusters, except for HRA studies, which reported health risk indices. The main tools used to investigate health outcomes and other health-related indicators were: (i) laboratory analysis of samples (for pollutants, infections and physiologic parameters); (ii) questionnaires for self-reported health outcomes and health risk indices estimations using HRA tools; and (iii) medical examination.

3.3.1. Type of ASM as Function of Extracted Commodities

Figure 5 shows the type and number of commodities reported to be extracted in the ASM contexts investigated in the included articles. A total of 23 extracted commodities were reported. The large majority of identified studies were carried out in ASGM context (n = 155). Other less reported commodities, such as coltan, aluminium (Al), coal, diamond, lead (Pb), Hg, and tin (Sn) are also shown in Figure 5. Of note, 10 studies were conducted in ASM settings where more than one commodity was extracted, including gold (Au), diamond, and emerald, (n = 2) [50,51]; iron (Fe), Sn, and Al (n = 2) [44,52]; Pb and zinc (Zn) (n = 2) [53,54]; Au, limestone, and Al (n = 1) [55]; Au and copper (Cu) (n = 1) [56]; Au, Sn, cassiterite, coltan, and gemstones (n = 1) [57]; and Au, manganese (Mn), and bauxite (n = 1) [58].

3.3.2. Characteristics of Study Populations

All studies, except one [59], mentioned the gender of the study population (Table 1). Most (87.5% [154/176]) included males and females. Of those, half (50.6%; [75/152]) included individuals of all ages (i.e., from 6 months and above) followed by those including adults only (i.e., 18 years and above) (32.9% [50/152]). More than half of these studies (54.5% [6/11]) investigating health in female subjects only, were focused on specific subgroups, i.e., pregnant women (n = 5) [32,60,61,62,63] and women of reproductive age (n = 1) [64].
As shown in Table 1, almost half of the studies (48.3% [85/176]) included both miners and residents. Two-thirds of these studies (67.0% 57/85]) addressed population groups of all ages and a quarter (25.0%; [21/85]) focused on adults (aged ≥18 years) only. Few studies (5.7% [10/176]) investigated children’s health. Seven articles (4.0% [7/176]) did not mention the age of study subjects. The maximum reported age was 98 years [65]. Among those investigating health in children, one included children working in ASM [59].

3.4. Type of Investigated Samples and Health Effects

Overall, 154 studies were identified that analysed at least one type of environmental or human samples. Human biological samples were collected in 114 studies. Environmental samples of human health relevance were collected in 71 studies. Thirty-one studies comprised both environmental and human sampling. While Hg alone was investigated in 74.4% [131/176] of the studies, physical (e.g., dust, exposition, and landslide) and biological hazards (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), malaria, and soil-transmitted helminth infections) were investigated in 27 and 18 studies, respectively.

3.4.1. Environmental Samples and Related Pollutants

In all included studies (n = 176), 10 different types of environmental samples were collected and analysed. Soil (n = 36), water (n = 35), fish (n = 22), sediment (n = 21), and non-fish food (n = 15) were the most frequently collected environmental samples (Figure 6, Panel A).
Hg and Pb were the most investigated ASM-related pollutants. For instance, in water samples Hg and Pb concentration levels were assessed in 24 and 14 studies, respectively. The same pattern was observed for other environmental samples (Figure 6, Panel B). The highest diversity of assessed environmental pollutants was observed in soil samples (28 pollutants). Air samples were analysed exclusively for Hg concentration using both portable Hg detector devices [49,66] and laboratory air analysis [67]. One study investigating air pollution measured oxygen (O2) and carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations, and other physical parameters, such as temperature and dust concentration [68]. Other environmental pollutants reported in a few studies investigating soil, water, fish, sediment, and food samples are summarised in Appendix B, Table A2.
As part of Appendix B, Table A3 provides details on environmental pollutants determined in dust and ore samples and Figure A1 and Figure A2 give details on other environmental samples, such as non-eatable plants and tailings, respectively.

3.4.2. Human Samples and Related Biomarkers

Panel A in Figure 7 presents the different types of human samples and biomarkers (internal body exposure) investigated in the included studies. Overall, 11 types of human samples were collected and analysed for both exposure assessments and medical examinations of study participants. The three most investigated types of human samples are hair (n = 71), urine (n = 54), and blood (n = 51).
The diversity of pollutants assessed in hair (n = 46) was higher than in urine (n = 25) and blood (n = 13) (Figure 7, Panel B). Most biomarkers were reported in less than four articles each. Two studies contributed significantly to the diversity based on the assessment of hair-biomarkers [69,70]. Similarly, the diversity of pollutants revealed through urine biomarkers was mostly related to the study from Nkulu and colleagues [31], measuring the level of 25 different pollutants in urine. Hg levels measured in hair (n = 69), urine (n = 50), and blood (n = 36) were clearly the chemical exposure most assessed in the last two decades. The second most reported pollutant was the level of Pb (measured in blood, n = 8) and arsenic (measured in urine, n = 6). Moreover, breast milk samples were exclusively analysed for Hg concentration levels [71,72]. Other less reported chemicals are given in more detail for hair, urine, blood, and nail biomarkers in Appendix C, Table A4. The list and frequencies of physiological parameter measured in serum is provided in Appendix C, Table A5.
Besides chemical pollutants, blood, and urine samples were also analysed for other physiological parameters, such as blood lactate and cyanide [73,74], haematological parameters, and other blood chemistry [47,75], mitochondrial DNA, and other DNA mutations [48,76,77,78], immunological response to vaccines, and other immune-related proteins [50,79,80], renal and respiratory parameters [75,81], and infectious diseases, such as malaria [82] and HIV [47,83]. Saliva (cortisol salivary) [84], Buccal cells (DNA damage and mutations) [63,77], and stool samples (soil-transmitted helminths and Vibrio cholerae) [85,86] were also reported.

3.5. Adverse Health Conditions and Fatalities

Of the 176 studies included in our analysis, 144 (81.8%) reported at least one of the following three groups of health issues: (i) prevalence or incidence of diseases and other adverse health conditions (n = 97); (ii) signs and symptoms related to chemical exposures (n = 71), with Hg exposure being studied most often (n = 53); and (iii) musculoskeletal disorders, injuries, and fatalities (n = 37) (Figure 8). An integrated approach was applied in more than half of the studies (n = 74). For instance, a combination of two (n = 48) and three (n = 20) types of health issues were identified and six studies incorporated all four types of health issues [87,88,89,90,91] in their reports. Health effects from gold extraction activities alone were investigated in 84% [149/176] of the studies.

3.5.1. Signs and Symptoms Related to Chemical Exposure

The use of Hg and its health effects were the major issues in the studies that met our inclusion criteria. We identified 71 studies addressing at least one sign and symptom related to exposure to Hg and other metals. Notably, most of these studies (61.9% [44/71]) had a strong focus on Hg alone, while an additional 12.7% [9/71] focused on concomitant exposure to Hg and other metals, such as Pb and As. Two-thirds of the studies [47/71] investigated potential signs and symptoms of exposure to environmental contaminants. Forty-one out of 44 studies investigating neurological symptoms assessed Hg exposure in the affected population. Likewise, 21 and 19 studies of those investigating visual disorders (n = 27) and neuro-motor function disorders (n = 21) assessed Hg exposure, respectively. All studies reporting neuropsychological symptoms (n = 20) also assessed Hg exposure. Other signs and symptoms included pain, hearing disorders, stress, cognitive impairment, and intelligence quotient (Figure 8). Only three studies investigating signs and symptoms of cyanide exposure were identified [73,74,92].

3.5.2. Adverse Health Conditions

Our study sample revealed 34 subcategories of diseases and other adverse health conditions. As shown in Figure 8, the six most frequently studied subcategories were: (i) nutritional disorders (n = 38); (ii) respiratory disorders (n = 32); (iii) renal diseases (n = 31); (iv) gastrointestinal disorders (n = 29); (v) poisoning (n = 29); and (vi) cardiovascular diseases (n = 23). Thirty studies addressed at least one infectious disease, such as malaria (n = 15), tuberculosis (n = 11), HIV infections and STIs (n = 7), typhoid (n = 5), and pneumonia (n = 4). Details on other types of communicable diseases reported in less than four studies are provided in Table A6, Appendix D.

3.5.3. Musculoskeletal Disorders, Injuries, and Fatalities

Eleven types of musculoskeletal disorders, injuries, and fatalities were reported in 37 studies. Musculoskeletal disorders (n = 17) were most frequently reported, followed by wounds (n = 11) and burns or abrasions (n = 11). Fatalities were reported in 16 studies, of which 12 were conducted in African countries.

3.6. Health Risk Indices

As shown in Figure 9, five HRIs were reported in 46 studies out of 176, namely (i) hazard quotient (HQ); (ii) hazard index (HI); (iii) cancer risk (CR); (iv) permissible exposure limit (PEL); and (v) risk rating (RR). The most frequent health index was the HQ (n = 36) of which (88.9% [32/36]) were from studies assessing chemical exposure from environmental samples only. Both total and targeted HQ (T-HQ) were used in some studies. HI is the sum of all computed HQs [93] and was computed in 20 studies. Both HQ and HI are individual health risk estimation for non-carcinogenic endpoint of environmental contaminant exposure [94].
The following most estimated HRI was the CR (n = 21), which is a term used to characterise lifetime probability of developing any type of cancer disease [52]. Two synonyms are used for this estimate, such as incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) and incremental excess lifetime cancer risk (IELCR) [94,95]. This indicator was exclusively estimated by human health risk assessment studies. RR (n = 8) and PEL (n = 3) were the less estimated HRI.
Adding to the five previous estimates, the intake rate estimate (i.e., chronic daily intake, CDI) were also considered in about a third of the studies (n = 55). Three routes of pollutants intake were reported. Ingestion (n = 53) was reported most frequently, followed by inhalation (n = 18) and dermal absorption (n = 16). Furthermore, 12 studies considered the three intake routes in an integrated manner.

4. Discussion

A total of 176 articles from 38 countries in Africa, Asia, and the Americas were identified in our scoping review and subjected to in-depth analysis. Systematic classification of the studies revealed a heavy focus on health research in the context of ASGM. Consequently, Hg exposure and associated health-related effects in affected populations were by far the most investigated research topics. The transmission of infectious diseases, such as malaria, STIs (mainly HIV), and tuberculosis in ASM contexts has received comparatively little attention. Musculoskeletal disorders, wounds, and burns were the types of injuries mostly investigated. Only a few health studies specifically investigated vulnerable population groups, such as women of reproductive age and children.

4.1. Representativeness of Health Research in ASM

ASM is practiced in 124 countries, primarily in LMICs in Africa (n = 49 countries), Asia (n = 35 countries), and Latin America and the Caribbean (n = 29 countries). In Europe (n = 6 countries), Northern America (n = 3 countries), and Oceania (n = 2 countries), ASM is far less often pursued [4]. However, the 176 health-related research articles included in our scoping review represent only a third of the countries hosting ASM activities (37.9% in Latin America and the Caribbean, 33.7% in Africa, 28.6% in Asia, and 16.7% in Europe). None of the included studies were conducted in Northern America and Oceania. Hence, from two-thirds of the countries with ASM activities, no health-related research has been reported in the peer-reviewed literature. When considering that ASM contexts are hotspots for occupational risks and public health challenges [23,24], this finding clearly points out that health research in ASM is a neglected area of research in many countries hosting ASM activities.
There are several potential underlying reasons why health in the context of ASM lacks pointed research. First, despite the current trend in urban mining, such as gold jewellery manufactures [96], ASM operations are often performed in distant or difficult-to-access settings [2,8]. Hence, data collections at mining sites are challenging in terms of access, while financial and human resources for research are often constrained [35,36]. Second, ASM activities are generally informal and take place in contexts with high cultural sensitivities [8,97,98]. This poses challenges to accessing people involved in ASM, including vulnerable population groups such as women of reproductive age, children, and ethnic minorities. Third, research efforts that aimed to build on secondary data sources from ASM settings have faced challenges with data availability and quality. For instance, it was found that data availability and quality were limited for estimating disease burden and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to Hg use in ASGM in Zimbabwe and elsewhere [35,36]. Despite the many potential challenges faced with the implementation of health studies in ASM settings, the high public health relevance—more than 40 million being directly exposed to ASM [4]; many are vulnerable or marginalised groups [8]; and many potential health issues [8,12]—calls for the definition of a comprehensive global research agenda that promotes health research in ASM contexts. This also aligns with ongoing initiatives such as the Global Mercury Partnership and the agenda of the World Bank, which has already recognised this topic as a “big global data gap” [15].

4.2. Inclusion of Vulnerable Groups

In health studies carried out in ASM contexts, women of reproductive age and children were rarely investigated as stand-alone groups. Among the few studies identified that included vulnerable groups, none focused specifically on the health status of women of reproductive age or children who were directly involved in ASM activities. Hence, health research in ASM contexts largely missed out on the most vulnerable population groups. This is in contrast to existing literature that has long established the vulnerability of women of reproductive age and children in ASM [2,5,12,99]. The limited health data pertaining to these vulnerable groups may be due to fear of ethical issues when conducting research involving vulnerable population groups [100], the informal nature of the sector [12], as well as cultural sensitivities and high gender-based inequities [97], which renders these groups less reachable due to their fear and distrust of participating in research studies [101]. When considering that an estimated 30–50% women and more than one million children are directly involved in ASM activities [15], better targeting, and inclusion of vulnerable groups in health studies carried out in ASM communities is a pressing need [102].
In order to address these challenges, it is essential that ethical boards, national and local health authorities, local organisations working in ASM settings and, most importantly, ASM communities are involved in every phase of the research process [103]. Indeed, early involvement of ethical boards presents an opportunity for overcoming potential uncertainties on how to invite vulnerable individuals to serve as participants in health research in ASM contexts with all the required special justification [100,104]. The integration and support from multi-sectoral and multidisciplinary stakeholders, including collaboration with governmental and non-governmental organisations, indigenous populations, local leaders, and potential participants is a common practice and proven useful [49,105,106,107]. The value added of such multi-stakeholder engagement enhances trust between participants and scientists when conducting research involving vulnerable groups [100,101,105]. Independent of the context and chosen approach, it is critical to give the community´s voices and decisions equal importance in addressing issues related to limited health data on vulnerable groups [49,106].

4.3. Gaps Identified in Exposure Assessments

The systematic characterisation of the articles identified in our scoping review revealed a high diversity of exposure assessment approaches, comprising the sampling and analysis of 51 different chemical hazards in both environmental and human samples. While the systematic use of multiple biomarkers when assessing the effect of (environmental) pollutants has been suggested previously [108], the observed strong focus on Hg is striking. This finding may, at least partially, be explained by the adoption of the Minamata Convention on Mercury in 2013, which triggered considerable interest in Hg pollution and exposure in ASGM [102,109]. Indeed, three-quarters of the articles identified were published after the adoption of the Minamata Convention in 2013. At the same time, the emphasis on Hg use in ASGM may be overshadowing other important health issues that prevail in ASM communities, such as silicosis and tuberculosis, water- and vector-borne disease and sexual health issues, such as STIs, including HIV [23]. This is confirmed by a global study showing that ASM scholars and practitioners are more concerned with Hg exposure in ASM communities than other health hazards [14]. Indeed, Hg exposure and its toxicological consequences pose considerable health and environmental concerns due to the expansion of ASGM activities into urban and sub-urban communities [96,110]. With only one quarter of the health studies in ASM contexts that addressed other health issues than Hg exposure in ASGM, there might be an important research gap. Future studies should therefore make an effort to comparatively assess the public health relevance of different chemicals, biological, biomechanical, physical, and psychosocial hazards that occur simultaneously in ASM settings [2,5,16], for ultimately developing a research agenda that addresses all major health risks and opportunities in ASM.

4.4. Widening the Focus of Health Conditions Studied

Less than one in five articles identified studied communicable diseases, such as malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV in ASM contexts. When considering that 68.8% of the burden of disease in LMICs, where ASM is mostly practiced, is caused by communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases [111,112], this finding is surprising. Moreover, it is likely that these conditions are more prevalent in ASM settings compared to the countries’ average due to the remote environments and potentially weak local health systems [111,113]. Indeed, studies have shown that ASM settings are characterised by high prevalence of air-, water-, blood-, and vector-borne diseases [5,114,115], as well as STIs and HIV [5]. The observed “high polarity” in health-related studies in ASM context may be linked to limited concern on other health hazards beyond Hg among ASM experts worldwide [14]. As a consequence, today, we face a systematic health data gap in the ASM sector at both national and regional levels, and, thus, scarce knowledge about the existing relationship between ASM activities, and the effect of other harmful exposures to the environmental and human health; a situation that may even further deteriorate in the current and future scenario of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

4.5. Strengths and Limitations

This scoping review attempted to draw a general picture of research covered, thus far, with regard to health issues in ASM communities worldwide. Given the unrestricting nature of our piece (i.e., all types of ASM were included), we feel that our study makes a meaningful contribution to the literature, providing new insights into health research practice in ASM contexts. This scoping review, however, comes with several limitations. First, we did not include grey literature and peer-reviewed articles for which no titles and abstracts in English were available. Second, radiological studies, systematic reviews, and qualitative studies were, post hoc, excluded from data extraction and analysis due to time and human resources constraints. Third, due to the lack of standard terms for investigated adverse health conditions, such as symptoms of Hg intoxication among included studies [27,63,82,116], misclassification or entry duplication may have occurred during data extraction, which may inflect or deflect our findings. Fourth, we did not characterise the included articles in relation to the location where studies were conducted (e.g., rural vs. urban mining), which might have affected the interpretation of our results [45,49,96,110]. Fifth, we acknowledge that for conclusively judging the inclusion of vulnerable populations groups (e.g., women of reproductive age, children, and ethnic minorities) in health research in ASM contexts, a more holistic review is needed that does not only focus on published peer-reviewed literature.

5. Conclusions

Heath studies in ASM contexts have gained in popularity and diversity over the past two decades. At the same time, when considering the global magnitude of ASM practice, the number of health-related studies in ASM appears to be low and several specific contexts are not adequately represented in the existing body of literature. This also applies to ASM activities other than ASGM. Indeed, 88.1% of the articles identified are representing gold mining contexts, and, thus, other ASM commodities, such as coltan and cobalt, both showing increasing demand worldwide, are largely neglected. Furthermore, there is a dearth of studies that have focused on specific vulnerable population groups that are directly involved in ASM processes. In addition to a biased representation of ASM contexts and affected population groups, health studies in ASM communities show a heavy focus on Hg-related exposures and associated health effects, whilst communicable diseases and other health conditions not associated with Hg use have received relatively little attention. Future research efforts addressing the “global health data gap” in ASM contexts should diversify in terms of commodities and health issues studies, while also paying particular attention to the most vulnerable population groups.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, H.C. and M.S.W.; methodology, H.C., R.S., P.A., A.L., K.M., E.M. and M.S.W.; formal analysis, H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.C. and M.S.W.; writing—review and editing, H.C., R.S., P.A., A.L., K.M., J.U., E.M. and M.S.W.; visualisation, H.C., M.S.W. and P.A.; supervision, M.S.W.; funding acquisition, M.S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received funding from the Swiss Programme for Research on Global Issues for Development (r4d Programme, www.r4d.ch), which is a joint funding initiative of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) (grant number 169461).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to our colleague Belinda Nimako for input in developing the search strategy of the scoping review and Anaïs Galli (A.G.) for assistance in record screening.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, data collection, analyses and findings´ interpretation as well as in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Table A1. Search terminology for the three electronic databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Number of records as of 14 July 2020.
Table A1. Search terminology for the three electronic databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Number of records as of 14 July 2020.
DatabaseSearch Terminology and StrategyNumber of Records (14 July 2020)
PubMed((artisanal[TIAB 1] OR small-scale[TIAB]) AND (mining[TIAB] OR mine[TIAB] OR miner[TIAB] OR mining[Mesh])) AND (health *[TIAB] OR health *[Mesh 2] OR disease *[TIAB] OR disease *[Mesh] OR injur *[TIAB] OR wound *[TIAB] OR “Wounds and Injuries”[Mesh] OR infect *[TIAB] OR infect *[Mesh] OR inciden *[TIAB] OR incidence[Mesh] OR prevalen *[TIAB] OR prevalence[Mesh] OR death *[TIAB] OR death[Mesh] OR dead *[TIAB] OR die[TIAB] OR died[TIAB] OR dying[TIAB] OR mortal *[Mesh] OR fatal *[TIAB] OR surviv *[TIAB] OR survival[Mesh] OR safety[TIAB] OR “safety management”[Mesh] OR risk[TIAB] OR risk[Mesh] OR hazard[TIAB] OR poisoning[TIAB] OR poisoning[Mesh])438
Web of Science (all databases)TS 3 = (((artisanal OR small-scale) AND (mine OR miner OR mining)) AND (health OR disease * OR wound * OR injur * OR infect * OR inciden * OR prevalen * OR death * OR dead * OR die OR died OR dying OR mortal * OR fatal * OR surviv * OR safety OR risk OR hazard OR poison *))1274
Scopustitle-abs-key 4 (artisanal OR “small-scale” OR “small-scale” OR “small scale”) AND title-abs-key (mine OR miner OR mining) AND title-abs-key (health OR disease OR diseases OR wound * OR injur * OR infection * OR inciden * OR prevalen * OR death * OR dead * OR die OR died OR dying OR mortal * OR fatal * OR surviv * OR safety OR risk OR hazard OR poison *)1052
1 Specify the search for titles and abstracts; 2 specify medical subject headings (Mesh); 3 specify the search for topic; 4 specify the search for titles and abstracts and keywords.

Appendix B

Table A2. Type of environmental pollutants and frequency of reporting studies in soil, water, sediment, fish, and food samples. Frequencies are given for pollutants reported in up to four studies, each.
Table A2. Type of environmental pollutants and frequency of reporting studies in soil, water, sediment, fish, and food samples. Frequencies are given for pollutants reported in up to four studies, each.
Chemical Names and Symbols of PollutantsFrequency of Reporting Studies per Type of Environmental Samples
SoilWaterSedimentFishFood
Antimony (Sb)42200
Selenium (Se)43112
Aluminium (Al)32200
Barium (Ba)21000
Phosphorus (P)20000
Tin (Sn)21000
Titanium (Ti)22000
Calcium (Ca)10000
Cerium (Ce)11000
Lithium (Li)11000
Molybdenum (Mo)12110
Neodymium (Nd)11000
Silicon (Si)10000
Uranium (U)11000
Vanadium (V)11000
Yttrium (Y)11000
Zirconium (Zr)11000
Table A3. Type and frequency of reported pollutants in ore and dust samples. Twenty-four environmental pollutants were reported in each sample (ore; n = 7 and dust; n = 7). In dust samples, most pollutants were reported in one study [31]. Frequencies are given for pollutants reported in up to four studies, each.
Table A3. Type and frequency of reported pollutants in ore and dust samples. Twenty-four environmental pollutants were reported in each sample (ore; n = 7 and dust; n = 7). In dust samples, most pollutants were reported in one study [31]. Frequencies are given for pollutants reported in up to four studies, each.
Chemical Names and Symbols of PollutantsFrequency of Reporting Studies per Type of Environmental Samples
DustOre
Mercury (Hg)31
Lead (Pb)24
Aluminium (Al)11
Antimony (Sb)11
Arsenic (As)12
Cadmium (Cd)12
Cerium (Ce)11
Chromium (Cr)11
Cobalt (Co)11
Copper (Cu)11
Iron (Fe)11
Lanthanum (La)11
Manganese (Mn)12
Molybdenum (Mo)11
Neodymium (Nd)11
Nickel (Ni)11
Selenium (Se)11
Silicon (Si)10
Tin (Sn)11
Titanium (Ti)11
Uranium (U)01
Vanadium (V)11
Yttrium (Y)11
Zinc (Zn)11
Zirconium (Zr)11
Figure A1. Biomarkers determined in non-edible plants and frequency of reporting articles (n = 10). In total, 14 pollutants were reported. Note: As, arsenic; Ba, barium; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; Cr, chromium; Cu, copper; Fe, iron; Hg, mercury; Mn, manganese; Mo, molybdenum; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; Se, selenium; and Zn, zinc.
Figure A1. Biomarkers determined in non-edible plants and frequency of reporting articles (n = 10). In total, 14 pollutants were reported. Note: As, arsenic; Ba, barium; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; Cr, chromium; Cu, copper; Fe, iron; Hg, mercury; Mn, manganese; Mo, molybdenum; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; Se, selenium; and Zn, zinc.
Ijerph 18 01555 g0a1
Figure A2. Environmental pollutants measured in mine tailings samples (n = 7). Note: As, arsenic; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; Cr, chromium; Cu, copper; Fe, iron; Hg, mercury; Mn, manganese; Ni, nickel; Pb, plumb; Sb, antimony; Ti, titanium; and Zn, zinc.
Figure A2. Environmental pollutants measured in mine tailings samples (n = 7). Note: As, arsenic; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; Cr, chromium; Cu, copper; Fe, iron; Hg, mercury; Mn, manganese; Ni, nickel; Pb, plumb; Sb, antimony; Ti, titanium; and Zn, zinc.
Ijerph 18 01555 g0a2

Appendix C

Table A4. Type of chemical pollutants and frequency of reporting studies per type of human samples. Frequencies of reporting articles are given for pollutants reported in up to three studies, each.
Table A4. Type of chemical pollutants and frequency of reporting studies per type of human samples. Frequencies of reporting articles are given for pollutants reported in up to three studies, each.
Symbols of ChemicalsFrequenciesSymbols of ChemicalsFrequencies
HairUrineBloodNailsHairUrineBloodNails
Cd3231I1000
Co3221In1100
Cr3211Mg1000
Al2201Mo1100
Ca2000Nb1000
Cl2000Pd1010
Fe2000Pt1100
K2000Rb1000
Na2000Sb1101
P2000Se1201
S2000Sn1100
Si2000Sr1000
Ag1000Te1100
Au1001V1100
Ba1100W1000
Bi1100Y1000
Br1000Zr1000
Ce1000Be0100
Cs1000Li0100
Ga1000Tl0120
Ge1000U0110
Note: Ga, gallium; Ge, germanium; In, indium; Rb, rubidium; Sr, strontium; Te, tellurium; Tl, thallium.
Table A5. Physiologic parameters assessed in serum samples in eight studies.
Table A5. Physiologic parameters assessed in serum samples in eight studies.
Physiological ParameterFrequency
Micronutrients7
Autoantibody/IRP5
Creatinine4
ALT3
AST3
Urea3
Glucose2
HIV antibodies2
T42
TSH2
T31
Note: ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; IRP, immune-related proteins; T3, triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxine; and TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Appendix D

Table A6. Profile of communicable and non-communicable diseases reported in less than four studies, each.
Table A6. Profile of communicable and non-communicable diseases reported in less than four studies, each.
DiseasesFrequency
Hepatitis3
Typhoid3
Agnathia–otocephaly1
Bodily vibration syndrome1
Buruli ulcer1
Dengue1
Dermatophyte infections1
Hansen1
Heatstroke1
Hernia1
Infertility1
Sexual violence1

References

  1. Zvarivadza, T. Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining as a challenge and possible contributor to Sustainable Development. Resour. Policy 2018, 56, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hentschel, T.; Hruschka, F.; Priester, M. Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining: Challenges and Opportunities; International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) and WBCSD: London, UK, 2003; p. 80. ISBN 1-84369-470-0. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hinton, J.J. Communities and Small Scale Mining: An Integrated Review For Development Planning, 1st ed.; Walser, G., Ed.; Mining Department, World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; Volume 1, pp. 4–24. [Google Scholar]
  4. Artisanalmining.org. The Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining Knowledge Sharing Archive. Available online: http://artisanalmining.org/ (accessed on 4 September 2020).
  5. WHO. Environmental and Occupational Health Hazards Associated with Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 1, p. 26. ISBN 9789241510271. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mutemeri, N.; Walker, J.Z.; Coulson, N.; Watson, I. Capacity building for self-regulation of the Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM) sector: A policy paradigm shift aligned with development outcomes and a pro-poor approach. Extr. Ind. Soc. Int. J. 2016, 3, 653–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Buxton, A. Responding to the Challenge of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining: How Can Knowledge Networks Help? International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 2013; p. 30. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fritz, M.; McQuilken, J.; Collins, N.; Weldegiorgis, F. Global Trends in Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM): A Review of Key Numbers and Issues; Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development (IGF): Winnipeg, MA, Canada, 2018; p. 81. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hilson, G. Small-scale mining, poverty and economic development in sub-Saharan Africa: An overview. Resour. Policy 2009, 34, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Eftimie, A.; Heller, K.; Strongman, J.; Hinton, J.; Lahiri-Dutt, K.; Mutemeri, N. Gender Dimensions of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining: A Rapid Assessment Toolkit; Report Number: 67520; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; p. 128. [Google Scholar]
  11. Levin-Nally, E. Global Trends in Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining: What do these mean for Mongolia? Available online: https://www.levinsources.com/knowledge-centre/insights/global-trends-in-artisanal-and-small-scale-mining-what-do-these-mean-for-mongolia (accessed on 4 September 2020).
  12. Jennings, N.S. Social and Labour Issues in Small-Scale Mines. Report for Discussion at the Tripartite Meeting on Social and Labour Issues in Small-scale Mines; International Labour Organization (ILO): Geneve, Switzerland, 1999; Volume 1, p. 99. ISBN 92-2-111480-5. [Google Scholar]
  13. Langston, J.D.; Lubis, M.I.; Sayer, J.A.; Margules, C.; Boedhihartono, A.K.; Dirks, P.H.G.M. Comparative development benefits from small and large scale mines in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2015, 2, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Smith, N.M.; Ali, S.; Bofinger, C.; Collins, N. Human health and safety in artisanal and small-scale mining: An integrated approach to risk mitigation. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 129, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. World Bank. 2019 State of the Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining Sector; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2019; p. 85. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bradley, J.; Rehman, A.M.; Schwabe, C.; Vargas, D.; Monti, F.; Ela, C.; Riloha, M.; Kleinschmidt, I. Reduced Prevalence of Malaria Infection in Children Living in Houses with Window Screening or Closed Eaves on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gan, W.Q.; Sanderson, W.T.; Browning, S.R.; Mannino, D.M. Different types of housing and respiratory health outcomes. Prev. Med. Rep. 2017, 7, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dondeyne, S.; Ndunguru, E.; Rafael, P.; Bannerman, J. Artisanal mining in central Mozambique: Policy and environmental issues of concern. Resour. Policy 2009, 34, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Secretary-General, U. Small-Scale Mining Activities in Developing Countries and Economies in Transition: Report of the Secretary-General; E/C.7/1994/9; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1993; p. 30. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ramazzini, B. De morbis artificum diatriba [diseases of workers]. 1713. Am. J. Public Health 2001, 91, 1380–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rose, G. The History of Miners′ Diseases: A Medical and Social Interpretation. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1944, 125, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cole, F.J. The History of Miners′ Diseases. Nature 1944, 154, 161–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Basu, N.; Clarke, E.; Green, A.; Calys-Tagoe, B.; Chan, L.; Dzodzomenyo, M.; Fobil, J.; Long, R.N.; Neitzel, R.L.; Obiri, S.; et al. Integrated Assessment of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Ghana-Part 1: Human Health Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 5143–5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Afrifa, J.; Opoku, Y.K.; Sorkpor, R.D. The Clinical Importance of the Mercury Problem in Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining. Front Public Health 2019, 7, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ostfeld, R.S. Biodiversity loss and the ecology of infectious disease. Lancet Planet Health 2017, 1, e2–e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baeuml, J.; Bose-O’Reilly, S.; Gothe, R.M.; Lettmeier, B.; Roider, G.; Drasch, G.; Siebert, U. Human Biomonitoring Data from Mercury Exposed Miners in Six Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining Areas in Asia and Africa. Minerals 2011, 1, 122–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bose-O’Reilly, S.; Nowak, D.; Bernaudat, L.; Drasch, G. Signs and Symptoms of Mercury-Exposed Gold Miners. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2017, 30, 249–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pringle, J.D. The Unprecedented Lead-Poisoning Outbreak: Ethical Issues in a Troubling Broader Context. Public Health Ethics 2014, 7, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gibb, H.; O'Leary, K.G. Mercury Exposure and Health Impacts among Individuals in the Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining Community: A Comprehensive Review. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tirima, S.; Bartrem, C.; von Lindern, I.; von Braun, M.; Lind, D.; Anka, S.M.; Abdullahi, A. Food contamination as a pathway for lead exposure in children during the 2010-2013 lead poisoning epidemic in Zamfara, Nigeria. J. Environ. Sci. 2018, 67, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nkulu, C.B.L.; Casas, L.; Saenen, N.D.; Kayembe-Kitenge, T.; Ilunga, J.-M.L.; Nawrot, T.S.; Nemery, B. Sustainability of artisanal mining of cobalt in DR Congo. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nyanza, E.C.; Dewey, D.; Manyama, M.; Martin, J.W.; Hatfield, J.; Bernier, F.P. Maternal exposure to arsenic and mercury and associated risk of adverse birth outcomes in small-scale gold mining communities in Northern Tanzania. Environ. Int. 2020, 137, 105450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Stuckler, D.; Basu, S.; McKee, M.; Lurie, M. Mining and Risk of Tuberculosis in Sub-Saharan Africa. Am. J. Public Health 2011, 101, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ostfeld, R.S. Tropical forests and child health. Lancet Planet Health 2017, 1, e164–e165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Steckling, N.; Bose-O'Reilly, S.; Pinheiro, P.; Plass, D.; Shoko, D.; Drasch, G.; Bernaudat, L.; Siebert, U.; Hornberg, C. The burden of chronic mercury intoxication in artisanal small-scale gold mining in Zimbabwe: Data availability and preliminary estimates. Environ. Health 2014, 13, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Steckling, N.; Tobollik, M.; Plass, D.; Hornberg, C.; Ericson, B.; Fuller, R.; Bose-O'Reilly, S. Global Burden of Disease of Mercury Used in Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining. Ann. Glob. Health 2017, 83, 234–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Betancur-Corredor, B.; Loaiza-Usuga, J.C.; Denich, M.; Borgemeister, C. Gold mining as a potential driver of development in Colombia: Challenges and opportunities. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 199, 538–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wilson, M.L.; Renne, E.; Roncoli, C.; Agyei-Baffour, P.; Tenkorang, E.Y. Integrated Assessment of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Ghana—Part 3: Social Sciences and Economics. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 8133–8156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Esdaile, L.J.; Chalker, J.M. The Mercury Problem in Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining. Chemistry 2018, 24, 6905–6916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Basu, N.; Ayelo, P.A.; Djogbénou, L.S.; Kedoté, M.; Lawin, H.; Tohon, H.; Oloruntoba, E.O.; Adebisi, N.A.; Cazabon, D.; Fobil, J.; et al. Occupational and Environmental Health Risks Associated with Informal Sector Activities-Selected Case Studies from West Africa. New Solut. A J. Environ. Occup. Health Policy 2016, 26, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Levac, D.; Colquhoun, H.; O'Brien, K.K. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement. Sci. 2010, 5, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O'Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.J.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Dorne, J.-L.C.M.; Kass, G.E.N.; Bordajandi, L.R.; Amzal, B.; Bertelsen, U.; Castoldi, A.F.; Heppner, C.; Eskola, M.; Fabiansson, S.; Ferrari, P.; et al. Human risk assessment of heavy metals: Principles and applications. In Metal Ions in Toxicology: Effects, Interactions, Interdependencies; Sigel, A., Sigel, H., Sigel, R.K.O., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2011; Volume 8, pp. 27–60. [Google Scholar]
  44. Orisakwe, O.E.; Dagur, E.A.; Mbagwu, H.O.; Udowelle, N.A. Lead Levels in Vegetables from Artisanal Mining Sites of Dilimi River, Bukuru and Barkin Ladi North Central Nigeria: Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Assessment. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2017, 18, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Laffont, L.; Sonke, J.E.; Maurice, L.; Monrroy, S.L.; Chincheros, J.; Amouroux, D.; Behra, P. Hg speciation and stable isotope signatures in human hair as a tracer for dietary and occupational exposure to mercury. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 9910–9916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rembold, F.; Kerdiles, H.; Meroni, M.; Pérez-Hoyos, A.; Urbano, F.; Agudo, L.M.; Dimou, M.; Bande, A.; Vojnović, P.; Team, A. ASPA—Anomaly Hotspots of Agricultural Production. Available online: https://mars.jrc.ec.europa.eu/asap/files/gaul0_asap_v04.zip (accessed on 2 June 2020).
  47. Malek, A.A.K.; El Khoury, R.; Halabi-Tawil, M.; Choucair, J. Chronic Mercury Intoxication Masquerading as Systemic Disease: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Eur. J. Case Rep. Intern. Med. 2017, 4, 000632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Tony, K.K.; Vicky, M.K.; de Luca, C.; Paul, M.O.; Eric, K.I.; Sébastien, M.M.; Tim, N.; Lubaba Nkulu, C.B.; Nemery, B.; Devriendt, K. Agnathia otocephaly: A case from the Katanga Copperbelt. Birth Defects Res. 2020, 112, 1287–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bose-O’Reilly, S.; Schierl, R.; Nowak, D.; Siebert, U.; William, J.F.; Owi, F.T.; Ir, Y.I. A preliminary study on health effects in villagers exposed to mercury in a small-scale artisanal gold mining area in Indonesia. Environ. Res. 2016, 149, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Gardner, R.M.; Nyland, J.F.; Silva, I.A.; Ventura, A.M.; Souza, J.M.d.; Silbergeld, E.K. Mercury exposure, serum antinuclear/antinucleolar antibodies, and serum cytokine levels in mining populations in Amazonian Brazil: A cross-sectional study. Environ. Res. 2010, 110, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Motts, J.A.; Shirley, D.L.; Silbergeld, E.K.; Nyland, J.F. Novel biomarkers of mercury-induced autoimmune dysfunction: A cross-sectional study in Amazonian Brazil. Environ. Res. 2014, 132, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Orisakwe, O.E.; Dagur, E.A.; Mbagwu, H.O.C.; Udowelle, N.A.; Offor, S.J. Levels of some heavy metals in vegetables from artisanal mining sites of Dilimi River, Bukuru and Barkin Ladi North Central Nigeria: Any public health concern? Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig. 2018, 69, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, S.; Tian, S.; Li, K.; Wang, L.; Liang, T. Heavy metal bioaccessibility and health risks in the contaminated soil of an abandoned, small-scale lead and zinc mine. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 15044–15056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sun, Z.; Hu, Y.; Cheng, H. Public health risk of toxic metal(loid) pollution to the population living near an abandoned small-scale polymetallic mine. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 718, 137434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Getriana, A.; Achmadi, U.F.; Leometa, C.H. Behavioral mercury exposure of people in artisanal and small-scale gold mining site area at lebaksitu village, 2017. Indian J. Public Health Res. Dev. 2018, 9, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ohlander, J.; Huber, S.M.; Schomaker, M.; Heumann, C.; Schierl, R.; Michalke, B.; Jenni, O.G.; Caflisch, J.; Munoz, D.M.; von Ehrenstein, O.S.; et al. Risk factors for mercury exposure of children in a rural mining town in northern Chile. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Rustad, S.A.; Ostby, G.; Nordas, R. Artisanal mining, conflict, and sexual violence in Eastern DRC. Extr. Ind. Soc. Int. J. 2016, 3, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Darko, G.; Adjei, S.; Nkansah, M.A.; Borquaye, L.S.; Boakye, K.O.; Dodd, M. Accumulation and bioaccessibility of toxic metals in root tubers and soils from gold mining and farming communities in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ashe, K. Elevated Mercury Concentrations in Humans of Madre de Dios, Peru. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Nyanza, E.C.; Joseph, M.; Premji, S.S.; Thomas, D.S.K.; Mannion, C. Geophagy practices and the content of chemical elements in the soil eaten by pregnant women in artisanal and small scale gold mining communities in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014, 14, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Nyanza, E.C.; Bernier, F.P.; Manyama, M.; Hatfield, J.; Martin, J.W.; Dewey, D. Maternal exposure to arsenic and mercury in small-scale gold mining areas of Northern Tanzania. Environ. Res. 2019, 173, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nyanza, E.C.; Dewey, D.; Bernier, F.; Manyama, M.; Hatfield, J.; Martin, J.W. Validation of Dried Blood Spots for Maternal Biomonitoring of Nonessential Elements in an Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining Area of Tanzania. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 1285–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wickliffe, J.K.; Lichtveld, M.Y.; Zijlmans, C.W.; MacDonald-Ottevanger, S.; Shafer, M.; Dahman, C.; Harville, E.W.; Drury, S.; Landburg, G.; Ouboter, P. Exposure to total and methylmercury among pregnant women in Suriname: Sources and public health implications. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2021, 31, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gonzalez, D.J.X.; Arain, A.; Fernandez, L.E. Mercury exposure, risk factors, and perceptions among women of childbearing age in an artisanal gold mining region of the Peruvian Amazon. Environ. Res. 2019, 179, 108786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Santos, E.C.d.O.; Jesus, I.M.d.; Brabo, E.d.S.; Loureiro, E.C.B.; Mascarenhas, A.F.d.S.; Weirich, J.; Câmara, V.d.M.; Cleary, D. Mercury exposures in riverside Amazon communities in Para, Brazil. Environ. Res. 2000, 84, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Gyamfi, O.; Sorenson, P.B.; Darko, G.; Ansah, E.; Bak, J.L. Human health risk assessment of exposure to indoor mercury vapour in a Ghanaian artisanal small-scale gold mining community. Chemosphere 2020, 241, 125014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Cortes-Maramba, N.; Reyes, J.P.; Francisco-Rivera, A.T.; Akagi, H.; Sunio, R.; Panganiban, L.C. Health and environmental assessment of mercury exposure in a gold mining community in Western Mindanao, Philippines. J. Environ. Manag. 2006, 81, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mayala, L.P.; Veiga, M.M.; Khorzoughi, M.B. Assessment of mine ventilation systems and air pollution impacts on artisanal tanzanite miners at M-erelani, Tanzania. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 116, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Clemente, E.; Sera, K.; Futatsugawa, S.; Murao, S. PIXE analysis of hair samples from artisanal mining communities in the Acupan region, Benguet, Philippines. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2004, 219, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Murao, S.; Daisa, E.; Sera, K.; Maglambayan, V.B.; Futatsugawa, S. PIXE measurement of human hairs from a small-scale mining site of the Philippines. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2002, 189, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bose-O’Reilly, S.; Lettmeier, B.; Shoko, D.; Roider, G.; Drasch, G.; Siebert, U. Infants and mothers levels of mercury in breast milk, urine and hair, data from an artisanal and small-scale gold mining area in Kadoma/Zimbabwe. Environ. Res. 2020, 184, 109266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bose-O’Reilly, S.; Lettmeier, B.; Roider, G.; Siebert, U.; Drasch, G. Mercury in breast milk—A health hazard for infants in gold mining areas? Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2008, 211, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Knoblauch, A.M.; Farnham, A.; Ouoba, J.; Zanetti, J.; Müller, S.; Jean-Richard, V.; Utzinger, J.; Wehrli, B.; Brugger, F.; Diagbouga, S.; et al. Potential health effects of cyanide use in artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Burkina Faso. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Leung, A.M.; Lu, J.L. Environmental Health and Safety Hazards of Indigenous Small-Scale Gold Mining Using Cyanidation in the Philippines. Environ. Health Insights 2016, 10, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Osim, E.E.; Tandayi, M.; Chinyanga, H.M.; Matarira, H.T.; Mudambo, K.K.; Musabayane, C.T. Lung function, blood gases, pH and serum electrolytes of small-scale miners exposed to chrome ore dust on the Great Dyke in Zimbabwe. Trop. Med. Int. Health 1999, 4, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Berky, A.J.; Meyer, J.; Ortiz, E.; Weinhouse, C.; Pan, W.K. Epidemiological Survey on Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Mitochondrial DNA Damage in the Peruvian Amazon. In Proceedings of the Environmental Mutagenesis and Genomics Society 47th Annual Meeting, Westin Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA, 24–28 September 2016; p. S78. [Google Scholar]
  77. Rosales-Rimache, J.A.; Elizabeth Malca, N.; Alarcon, J.J.; Chavez, M.; Gonzales, M.A. Genotoxic damage among artisanal and small-scale mining workers exposed to mercury. Rev. Peru Med. Exp. Salud Publica 2013, 30, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  78. Berky, A.J.; Ryde, I.T.; Feingold, B.; Ortiz, E.J.; Wyatt, L.H.; Weinhouse, C.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Meyer, J.N.; Pan, W.K. Predictors of mitochondrial DNA copy number and damage in a mercury-exposed rural Peruvian population near artisanal and small-scale gold mining: An exploratory study. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2018, 60, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wyatt, L.; Permar, S.R.; Ortiz, E.; Berky, A.; Woods, C.W.; Amouou, G.F.; Itell, H.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Pan, W. Mercury Exposure and Poor Nutritional Status Reduce Response to Six Expanded Program on Immunization Vaccines in Children: An Observational Cohort Study of Communities Affected by Gold Mining in the Peruvian Amazon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Rodríguez, L.H.S.; Flórez-Vargas, O.; Rodríguez-Villamizar, L.A.; Fiallo, Y.V.; Stashenko, E.E.; Ramírez, G. Lack of autoantibody induction by mercury exposure in artisanal gold mining settings in Colombia: Findings and a review of the epidemiology literature. J. Immunotoxicol. 2015, 12, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Essien-Baidoo, J.A.S.; Ephraim, R.K.D.; Nkrumah, D.; Dankyira, D.O. Reduced egfr, elevated urine protein and low level of personal protective equipment compliance among artisanal small scale gold miners at Bibiani-Ghana: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Crompton, P.; Ventura, A.M.; De Souza, J.M.; Santos, E.; Strickland, G.T.; Silbergeld, E. Assessment of mercury exposure and malaria in a Brazilian Amazon riverine community. Environ. Res. 2002, 90, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sagaon-Teyssier, L.; Balique, H.; Diallo, F.; Kalampalikis, N.; Mora, M.; Bourrelly, M.; Suzan-Monti, M.; Spire, B.; Dembele Keita, B. Prevalence of HIV at the Kokoyo informal gold mining site: What lies behind the glitter of gold with regard to HIV epidemics in Mali? A community-based approach (the ANRS-12339 Sanu Gundo cross-sectional survey). BMJ Open 2017, 7, e016558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Green, A.; Jones, A.D.; Sun, K.; Neitzel, R.L. The Association between Noise, Cortisol and Heart Rate in a Small-Scale Gold Mining Community-A Pilot Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 9952–9966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Opare, J.; Ohuabunwo, C.; Afari, E.; Wurapa, F.; Sackey, S.; Der, J.; Afakye, K.; Odei, E. Outbreak of cholera in the East Akim Municipality of Ghana following unhygienic practices by small-scale gold miners, November 2010. Ghana. Med. J. 2012, 46, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Castilhos, Z.; Villas-Bôas, R.; Miranda, A.; Rodrigues-Filho, S.; Jesus, I.d.; Brabo, E.; Cesar, R.; Lima, M.; Beinhoff, C.; Faial, K.; et al. Human exposure and risk assessment associated with mercury contamination in artisanal gold mining areas in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 11255–11264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Elenge, M.M.; De Brouwer, C. Identification of hazards in the workplaces of Artisanal mining in Katanga. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2011, 24, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bartrem, C.; Tirima, S.; Lindern, I.v.; Braun, M.v.; Worrell, M.C.; Anka, S.M.; Abdullahi, A.; Moller, G. Unknown risk: Co-exposure to lead and other heavy metals among children living in small-scale mining communities in Zamfara State, Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2014, 24, 304–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Riaz, A.; Khan, S.; Muhammad, S.; Liu, C.; Shah, M.T.; Tariq, M. Mercury contamination in selected foodstuffs and potential health risk assessment along the artisanal gold mining, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Environ. Geochem Health 2018, 40, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Villalobos, N.F. Exposición a mercurio de las personas que trabajan en la minería artesanal de oro, Costa Rica, 2015-2016. Poblac. Y Salud Mesoam. 2019, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Diallo, M.; Soulama, M.; Compaore, N.A.; Kabore, D.S.R.; Ouedraogo, G.A.; Dakoure, P.W.H. Gold panner blast hand. Hand Surg. Rehabil. 2020, 39, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Coulibaly, G.; Sanou, G.; Sanon, M.; Lengani, A.H.Y.; Bonzi, J.Y.; Semde, A. Clinical, Paraclinical, and Evolutionary Profiles of Kidney Failure in Gold Miners Hospitalized in a Nephrological Service in a Sub-Saharan African Country. Int. J. Nephrol. 2020, 2020, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Umbangtalad, S.; Parkpian, P.; Visvanathan, C.; Delaune, R.D.; Jugsujinda, A. Assessment of Hg contamination and exposure to miners and schoolchildren at a small-scale gold mining and recovery operation in Thailand. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2007, 42, 2071–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bello, S.; Nasiru, R.; Garba, N.N.; Adeyemo, D.J. Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals exposure from Shanono and Bagwai artisanal gold mines, Kano state, Nigeria. Sci. Afr. 2019, 6, e00197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Johnbull, O.; Abbassi, B.; Zytner, R.G. Risk assessment of heavy metals in soil based on the geographic information system-Kriging technique in Anka, Nigeria. Environ. Eng. Res. 2019, 24, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Abbas, H.H.; Sakakibara, M.; Sera, K.; Arma, L.H. Mercury Exposure and Health Problems in Urban Artisanal Gold Mining (UAGM) in Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Geosciences 2017, 7, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Lyster, O.; Singo, J. Impacts of COVID-19 on women in ASM. Available online: https://www.levinsources.com/knowledge-centre/insights/impacts-covid-19-women-asm (accessed on 1 November 2020).
  98. Adewumi, A.J.; Laniyan, T.A.; Xiao, T.; Liu, Y.; Ning, Z. Exposure of children to heavy metals from artisanal gold mining in Nigeria: Evidences from bio-monitoring of hairs and nails. Acta Geochim. 2019, 39, 451–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hilson, G. Poverty traps in small-scale mining communities: The case of sub-Saharan Africa. Can. J. Dev. Stud. 2012, 33, 180–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Richter, M.S.; Groft, J.Ν.; Prinsloo, L. Ethical issues surrounding studies with vulnerable populations: A case study of South African street children. Int. J. Adolesc Med. Health 2007, 19, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Calys-Tagoe, B.N.L.; Clarke, E.; Robins, T.; Basu, N. A comparison of licensed and un-licensed artisanal and small-scale gold miners (ASGM) in terms of socio-demographics, work profiles, and injury rates. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. United Nations. Minamata Convention on Mercury, 1st ed.; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Volume 2, p. 50. [Google Scholar]
  103. Farnham, A.; Cossa, H.; Dietler, D.; Engebretsen, R.; Leuenberger, A.; Lyatuu, I.; Nimako, B.; Zabre, H.R.; Brugger, F.; Winkler, M.S. Investigating Health Impacts of Natural Resource Extraction Projects in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mozambique, and Tanzania: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. Jmir. Res. Protoc. 2020, 9, e17138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Rose, S. International Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2009, 170, 1451–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wurr, C.; Cooney, L. Ethical Dilemmas in Population-Level Treatment of Lead Poisoning in Zamfara State, Nigeria. Public Health Ethics 2014, 7, 298–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Calys-Tagoe, B.N.L.; Ovadje, L.; Clarke, E.; Basu, N.; Robins, T. Injury Profiles Associated with Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Tarkwa, Ghana. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 7922–7937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Harris, K.M. An integrative approach to health. Demography 2010, 47, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Tsangaris, C.; Kormas, K.; Strogyloudi, E.; Hatzianestis, I.; Neofitou, C.; Andral, B.; Galgani, F. Multiple biomarkers of pollution effects in caged mussels on the Greek coastline. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharm. 2010, 151, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Hilson, G.; Zolnikov, T.R.; Ortiz, D.R.; Kumah, C. Formalizing artisanal artisanal gold mining under the Minamata convention: Previewing the challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environ. Sci. Policy 2018, 85, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Niane, B.; Guedron, S.; Moritz, R.; Cosio, C.; Ngom, P.M.; Deverajan, N.; Pfeifer, H.R.; Pote, J. Human exposure to mercury in artisanal small-scale gold mining areas of Kedougou region, Senegal, as a function of occupational activity and fish consumption. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015, 22, 7101–7111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Abbasi, M.; Abbasifard, M.; Abbasi-Kangevari, M.; Abbastabar, H.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdelalim, A.; Abdollahi, M.; Abdollahpour, I.; et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1204–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. IHME. Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx): GBD Compare and Viz Hub. Available online: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ (accessed on 10 November 2020).
  113. Knoblauch, A.M.; Winkler, M.S.; Archer, C.; Divall, M.J.; Owuor, M.; Yapo, R.M.; Yao, P.A.; Utzinger, J. The epidemiology of malaria and anaemia in the Bonikro mining area, central Cote d'Ivoire. Malar. J. 2014, 13, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Nongrem, W.I.E.; Chhawna, V. An Exploratory Study of Health and Livelihood Conditions of Coal Workers in Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya. Indian J. Labour Econ. 2020, 63, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Tse, L.A.; Li, Z.M.; Wong, T.W.; Fu, Z.M.; Yu, I.T. High prevalence of accelerated silicosis among gold miners in Jiangxi, China. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2007, 50, 876–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Alcala-Orozco, M.; Caballero-Gallardo, K.; Olivero-Verbel, J. Mercury exposure assessment in indigenous communities from Tarapaca village, Cotuhe and Putumayo Rivers, Colombian Amazon. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 36458–36467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow chart indicating the number of articles that were searched in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS), screened, and included in the current scoping review (ASM, artisanal and small-scale mining).
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow chart indicating the number of articles that were searched in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS), screened, and included in the current scoping review (ASM, artisanal and small-scale mining).
Ijerph 18 01555 g001
Figure 2. Geographical and temporal distribution of included articles (n = 176) per country (A) and year of publication (B). Source: authors’ compilation from extracted data; national administrative boundaries dada ware obtained at Anomaly Hotspots of Agricultural Production (ASAP) (https://mars.jrc.ec.europa.eu/asap/files/gaul0_asap_v04.zip) [46].
Figure 2. Geographical and temporal distribution of included articles (n = 176) per country (A) and year of publication (B). Source: authors’ compilation from extracted data; national administrative boundaries dada ware obtained at Anomaly Hotspots of Agricultural Production (ASAP) (https://mars.jrc.ec.europa.eu/asap/files/gaul0_asap_v04.zip) [46].
Ijerph 18 01555 g002
Figure 3. Overview of the characteristics of the 176 included health studies. Three main approaches for studying health were employed, including (i) health assessment (HA); (ii) human biomonitoring (HBM); and (iii) health risk assessment (HRA). Overlaps indicate studies for which more than one approach was used.
Figure 3. Overview of the characteristics of the 176 included health studies. Three main approaches for studying health were employed, including (i) health assessment (HA); (ii) human biomonitoring (HBM); and (iii) health risk assessment (HRA). Overlaps indicate studies for which more than one approach was used.
Ijerph 18 01555 g003
Figure 4. Overview of the main study type clusters, and a conceptual framework of exposure assessment and health outcome investigation strategies. Overlaps exist between different approaches; hence, frequency exceeds the total of 176 included studies.
Figure 4. Overview of the main study type clusters, and a conceptual framework of exposure assessment and health outcome investigation strategies. Overlaps exist between different approaches; hence, frequency exceeds the total of 176 included studies.
Ijerph 18 01555 g004
Figure 5. Type of ASM studied as a function of extracted commodities. The numbers indicate the total of reporting studies. Note: Al, aluminium; Bau, bauxite; Cas, cassiterite; Co, cobalt; Cr, chrome; Cu, copper; Ge, gemstones; Lime, limestones; Mn, manganese; Peg, pegmatite; San, sandstones; Sph, sphalerite; and Tnz, tanzanite.
Figure 5. Type of ASM studied as a function of extracted commodities. The numbers indicate the total of reporting studies. Note: Al, aluminium; Bau, bauxite; Cas, cassiterite; Co, cobalt; Cr, chrome; Cu, copper; Ge, gemstones; Lime, limestones; Mn, manganese; Peg, pegmatite; San, sandstones; Sph, sphalerite; and Tnz, tanzanite.
Ijerph 18 01555 g005
Figure 6. Profile of investigated environmental samples and pollutants. Numbers are frequency of reporting articles. Panel (A), type of examined samples and Panel (B), type of investigated pollutants. Note: Hg, mercury; Pb, lead; Zn, zinc; As, Arsenic; Cd, cadmium; Cu, copper; Cr, chromium; Ni, nickel; Mn, manganese; Fe, iron; Co, cobalt; and (*) other environmental pollutants reported in few studies (e.g., 1 to 4 studies, each).
Figure 6. Profile of investigated environmental samples and pollutants. Numbers are frequency of reporting articles. Panel (A), type of examined samples and Panel (B), type of investigated pollutants. Note: Hg, mercury; Pb, lead; Zn, zinc; As, Arsenic; Cd, cadmium; Cu, copper; Cr, chromium; Ni, nickel; Mn, manganese; Fe, iron; Co, cobalt; and (*) other environmental pollutants reported in few studies (e.g., 1 to 4 studies, each).
Ijerph 18 01555 g006
Figure 7. Human samples and biomarker profile. Investigated biomarkers include heavy metals and metalloids. Numbers are frequency of reporting articles. Panel (A), type of examined samples and Panel (B), type of investigated pollutants. Note: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; Hg, mercury; Pb, lead; Zn, zinc; As, arsenic; Cu, copper; Ni, nickel; Mn, manganese; Ti, titanium; and (*) other chemical pollutants reported in few studies (e.g., 1 to 3 studies, each).
Figure 7. Human samples and biomarker profile. Investigated biomarkers include heavy metals and metalloids. Numbers are frequency of reporting articles. Panel (A), type of examined samples and Panel (B), type of investigated pollutants. Note: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; Hg, mercury; Pb, lead; Zn, zinc; As, arsenic; Cu, copper; Ni, nickel; Mn, manganese; Ti, titanium; and (*) other chemical pollutants reported in few studies (e.g., 1 to 3 studies, each).
Ijerph 18 01555 g007
Figure 8. Main and sub-categories of adverse health conditions investigated at both population and individual level in ASM settings. Note: DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; Hg, mercury, HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MSD, musculoskeletal disorders; and STIs, sexually transmitted infections. Other adverse health outcomes are reported in less than four studies, each.
Figure 8. Main and sub-categories of adverse health conditions investigated at both population and individual level in ASM settings. Note: DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; Hg, mercury, HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MSD, musculoskeletal disorders; and STIs, sexually transmitted infections. Other adverse health outcomes are reported in less than four studies, each.
Ijerph 18 01555 g008
Figure 9. Health risk indices reported 46 out of 176 included studies. Figures represent the number of studies reporting each index. Note: PEL, permissible exposure limit.
Figure 9. Health risk indices reported 46 out of 176 included studies. Figures represent the number of studies reporting each index. Note: PEL, permissible exposure limit.
Ijerph 18 01555 g009
Table 1. Distribution of study populations by age group, gender, and population groups (n = 176).
Table 1. Distribution of study populations by age group, gender, and population groups (n = 176).
Population CharacteristicsChildren
(<15 Years)
Adolescents
and Adults
(≥15 Years)
Adults
(≥18 Years)
All Ages
(≥6 Months)
Age Group Not DefinedTotal
Gender
Males and females81450775154
Female1521110
Male0091111
Gender not defined100001
Population groups
Miners and residents152157185
Miners08327552
Residents96815139
Total101961797176
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cossa, H.; Scheidegger, R.; Leuenberger, A.; Ammann, P.; Munguambe, K.; Utzinger, J.; Macete, E.; Winkler, M.S. Health Studies in the Context of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041555

AMA Style

Cossa H, Scheidegger R, Leuenberger A, Ammann P, Munguambe K, Utzinger J, Macete E, Winkler MS. Health Studies in the Context of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(4):1555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041555

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cossa, Hermínio, Rahel Scheidegger, Andrea Leuenberger, Priska Ammann, Khátia Munguambe, Jürg Utzinger, Eusébio Macete, and Mirko S. Winkler. 2021. "Health Studies in the Context of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining: A Scoping Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 4: 1555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041555

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop