Next Article in Journal
Effects of Seven-Year Fertilization Reclamation on Bacterial Community in a Coal Mining Subsidence Area in Shanxi, China
Previous Article in Journal
The Interaction between Lockdown-Specific Conditions and Family-Specific Variables Explains the Presence of Child Insomnia during COVID-19: A Key Response to the Current Debate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Maternal Active and Secondhand Smoking during Pregnancy on Childhood Obesity at 3 Years of Age: A Nested Case–Control Study from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS)

1
Center for Birth Cohort Studies, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
2
Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
3
Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Shirakawa Kosei General Hospital, Fukushima 961-0005, Japan
5
Fukushima Regional Centre for the Japan Environmental and Children’s Study, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
6
Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membership of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group is provided in Acknowledgments.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(23), 12506; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312506
Submission received: 7 October 2021 / Revised: 23 November 2021 / Accepted: 24 November 2021 / Published: 27 November 2021

Abstract

:
Maternal smoking during pregnancy is a risk factor for childhood obesity; however, the combined effect of secondhand smoking during pregnancy on children in the early years is unclear. We examined the effects of maternal active and secondhand smoking during pregnancy on childhood obesity in a large population-based cohort. A nested case–control study originating from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study was performed. The maternal smoking status was collected via self-administered questionnaires during mid/late pregnancy. Obesity in children was determined based on BMI measured at 3 years of age. In total, 4875 cases and 19,491 controls were included in the analyses. Conditional logistic regression models with a significance level of 5% (two-tailed test) were used to test the association. The proportion of mothers who continued smoking and who were exposed to secondhand smoking daily during pregnancy were 3.9% and 13.0% in cases and 2.9% and 10.8% in controls, respectively. Continuous maternal smoking was associated with increased odds of obesity compared to those who never smoked or quit smoking before the pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.92). The odds increased further when combined with secondhand smoking. The promotion of non-smoking among family members, in public and workplace could benefit pregnant women and offspring.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of overweight or obesity in children under 5 years of age has increased dramatically in the last two decades worldwide, from 32 million in 1990 to 38 million in 2019 [1]. It is an important public health concern to prevent childhood obesity as it can increase the risk of various disorders, such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and respiratory diseases in the later part of life [2].
Maternal smoking during pregnancy has been reported as a risk factor for childhood obesity [3,4,5]. Children born to mothers who smoke were found to become obese by 2 years of age at the earliest among low-income populations in the United States [6]. Overweight at 3 years of age was also reported among children whose mothers smoked during early pregnancy among low-income and disadvantaged populations in the United States [7,8]. In Japan, it has been reported that maternal smoking is associated with childhood obesity at 5 years of age, and that the effect persists until 9−10 years of age [9,10,11].
Prenatal exposure to secondhand smoke is also reported as a risk factor of childhood obesity [12]; however, it is not clear what is the effect of the combination of maternal active smoking and secondhand smoking on childhood obesity. There was a decline in the maternal smoking rate during pregnancy in Japan to 2.7% in 2017, owing to the success of various public health interventions [13]. In contrast, exposure to secondhand smoke remains high. The International Tobacco Control (ITC) Japan Wave 1 Survey (Feb–Mar 2018) reported the smoking prevalence rate in workplaces, restaurants, and bars as 49%, 55%, and 83%, respectively [14]. Therefore, it is important to understand the significance of secondhand smoke on child health.
The present study aims to investigate (i) whether maternal active and secondhand smoking during pregnancy increases the offspring’s risk of obesity at 3 years of age in the Japanese population and (ii) how effects of maternal active and secondhand smoking interact with each other.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Setting and Population

The present study was a nested case–control study originating from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS), which is an ongoing nationwide prospective birth cohort study launched in January 2011. Its detailed protocols have been published elsewhere [15,16]. Between 2011 and 2014, 15 Regional Centres across the nation recruited pregnant women who resided in the catchment areas of the centres, had expected due dates between 1 August 2011 and mid-2014 and had no difficulty in understanding Japanese [15]. Their partners and offspring were also recruited and followed-up by the Regional Centres. Assessments at baseline and 1 year after study inception showed representativeness of the study population to the general Japanese population [17,18].
Among the participants of the JECS, only singleton children were included in the present study, as singleton babies were considered to have different birth weights and growth patterns after birth compared to multiple-birth babies [19,20]. Children who had their heights and weights measured at 3 years of age (33 to < 39 months) were included in the analyses. A large number of study participants (n = 30,548, 31.0%) did not have their anthropometry measurements recorded at proper timing and had to be excluded from the study. We performed a nested case–control study to improve comparability between two groups in response to a large number of participants who did not have their anthropometry measured. Each case (defined as obesity at 3 years of age determined as >95 percentile in Body Mass Index: BMI) was frequently matched with four controls (defined as non-obesity at 3 years of age) by gestational week, birth weight, and maternal age without replacement. Caliper width for gestational week, birth weight, and maternal age was set as 1 week, 300 g, and 5 years, respectively.

2.2. Measure of Exposure

The information on the smoking status of the parents and secondhand smoke exposure was collected using self-administered questionnaires at early and mid/late pregnancy. The present study used the information collected at mid/late pregnancy to ensure capturing smoking status from conception to the time of responding to the questionnaires. The questionnaires were mailed or handed out by co-operating health care providers to each woman and were submitted to the Regional Centres. The expectant mothers were asked to choose whether they or their partners had ever smoked, quit smoking before pregnancy, quit smoking after pregnancy, or were still smoking. For secondhand smoking, the expectant mothers answered how often they inhaled tobacco smoke at home, workplace, or any other indoor places before and during pregnancy, respectively, by choosing frequency from either ‘seldom’, ‘one day per week’, ‘two to three days per week’, ‘four to six days per week’ or ‘every day’. ‘One day per week’ to ‘four to six days per week’ were re-categorised as ‘several times per week’. We also created a variable that was a combination of maternal active and secondhand smoking during pregnancy.

2.3. Outcome Definitions and Measurements

The primary outcome was childhood obesity at 3 years of age. A child was considered to be obese when their BMI was >95 percentile according to the child growth standards of the World Health Organization (WHO) according to sex [21]. We decided to use the WHO growth chart to maintain comparability across different countries by using the global standard. The BMI was calculated based on the height and weight reported via self-administered questionnaires. To minimise measurement errors, caregivers were asked to report the most recent height and weight that were measured at well-child visits or at hospitals and mention the date of measurement, if available. If unavailable, height and weight measured at nursery schools or homes were entered. Only birth weight was extracted from medical record transcripts from the co-operating healthcare providers.

2.4. Measure of Covariates

Maternal body weight as well as the health-related behaviours of mothers, such as alcohol and food consumption, were considered as maternal factors that influence the body composition of offspring [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Consumption of Omega-3 fatty acid that is included in red-fish during pregnancy can reduce risk of low birth weight [27] and can lower the risk of obesity at a later time in life. Therefore, we included frequency of red-fish consumption between conception to mid/late pregnancy based on self-reported Food Frequency Questionnaire. Socioeconomic status was also reported to be associated with obesity and considered in this study [28,29,30]. Adiposity rebound before 3 years of age was also considered in the present study. Children whose BMI at 3 years of age was greater than BMI at 1.5, 2 or 2.5 years—whichever available—were considered to have rebound adiposity before 3 years of age. Adiposity rebound was first defined by Rolland-Cachera et al. as rapid growth in body fat after the first phase of growth in adipose tissues in the first year of life [31]. The earlier occurrence of adiposity rebound was reported to be a predictor of future obesity in children [32,33]. Overall, sex of the child, adiposity rebound, maternal obesity before pregnancy, maternal job type at conception, maternal educational level, family income, alcohol drinking status of the mother during pregnancy, maternal fish intake during pregnancy, child’s attendance at nursery school by 1 year of age, and breastfeeding were identified as possible confounders. Breastfeeding was categorized into (1) exclusive breastfeeding, (2) mixed (combination of breastmilk and formula milk), and (3) formula milk only, for up to 6 months of age. Child sex, maternal height and weight before pregnancy were recorded at the co-operating healthcare provider where the mother gave birth. Maternal BMI was categorised into four groups: <18.5 kg/m2 (underweight), 18.5 to <25 kg/m2 (normal), 25 to <30 kg/m2 (overweight), and ≥30 kg/m2 (obese). All other covariates were collected from mothers or caregivers via self-administered questionnaires at entry, mid/late pregnancy, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after childbirth.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

The dataset of jecs-ta-20190930 was used for analyses. First, the distributions and frequency of exposures, outcomes, and covariates according to cases and controls were analysed and summarised as proportions (percentages) or means as appropriate. Univariate analyses were then performed to assess the association of obesity at 3 years of age to maternal smoking during pregnancy and other covariates, respectively, using a conditional logistic regression model. Multivariate analyses were performed by adding all covariates to evaluate the associations between maternal smoking during pregnancy and child obesity using a conditional logistic regression model. We selected covariates on a priori hypothesis basis, and included all the covariates in the multivariate model unless there was evidence of multicollinearity. The interaction between sex of the child and maternal smoking on obesity was further examined by using the likelihood ratio test (LRT), as it was previously reported that the risk of childhood obesity might differ by sex [10]. Finally, we examined the association between the combination of maternal active and secondhand smoking during pregnancy and childhood obesity. LRT was applied to examine multiplicative and additive interaction between maternal active and secondhand smoking. A significance level of 5% with a two-tailed test was applied for all statistical tests. All analyses were performed using STATA/MP 16.1.

2.6. Ethics Approval

This study complied with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research involving Human Subjects that was promulgated by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. The JECS protocol was approved by the Ministry of the Environment’s Institutional Review Board on Epidemiological Studies (no. 100406001) and approved by the ethics committees of all participating institutions. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

3. Results

Among the 100,304 registered live births, multiple births (n = 1891) were excluded. Among 98,413 children, 30,548 who did not have their weights and heights measured at 3 years of age (33 to < 39 months) were excluded (Figure 1). Among those that were excluded, the proportions of children exposed to tobacco smoke and those at a lower socioeconomic status were higher compared to those that were included (Table 1). In total, 4875 cases and 19,491 controls were identified and included in the analyses. Among them, 12.6% of cases and 14.6% of controls had their weights and heights measured at well-child visits or at hospitals. The majority had undergone anthropometric measurements at nursery schools (58.5% of cases and 55.9% of controls). The characteristics of the study participants are summarised in Table 2. The proportion of mothers and fathers who continued smoking during pregnancy was 3.9% and 46.1% of cases, respectively, and 2.9% and 42.8% of controls, respectively. Mothers who were exposed to secondhand smoking every day during pregnancy accounted for 13.0% of cases and 10.8% of controls. Almost half of the children were male in both cases (52.6%) and controls (52.9%). More than half of the mothers in both groups were employed. Maternal obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) was 4.7% in the cases and 2.2% in the controls. There were significant differences in birth weight and gestational week at birth between cases and controls (p < 0.001).
Table 3 summarises the results of univariate and multivariate analyses on the association between childhood obesity and maternal active smoking during pregnancy, and childhood obesity and other covariates. In univariate analyses, children had higher odds of being obese at 3 years of age when their mothers quit smoking after pregnancy (odds ratio (OR), 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11–1.35) or continued smoking during pregnancy (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.18–1.65) compared to those whose mothers never smoked or quit smoking before pregnancy. In the multivariate analysis, exposure to secondhand smoking before pregnancy was excluded due to a strong correlation between secondhand smoking before pregnancy and secondhand smoking during pregnancy. After adjusting for covariates, continuous maternal smoking during pregnancy was still associated with an increased risk of obesity (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01–1.92) relative to mothers who never smoked or quit smoking before pregnancy. Exposure to secondhand smoking during pregnancy was also associated with higher odds of obesity among those who were exposed everyday (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01–1.50) compared to non-exposure. There was no multiplicative interaction in the effects on childhood obesity between maternal smoking during pregnancy and child sex (LRT: p = 0.988), and between maternal smoking and exposure to secondhand smoking during pregnancy (LRT: p = 0.142).
Nonetheless, an additive interaction existed between maternal smoking and secondhand smoking (LRT: p = 0.033). The odds of obesity tended to be higher when a higher exposure to maternal active and secondhand smoking was combined compared to the group with no maternal active smoking and seldom exposure to secondhand smoking (Table 4).

4. Discussion

The present study showed that continuous maternal smoking during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of childhood obesity at 3 years of age in the Japanese population, which has a relatively low prevalence of obesity compared to the global average [34,35]. The result was consistent with those of previous studies that showed an association between maternal smoking and childhood obesity in other countries [3,4,9,36]. It was believed that increased concentrations of nicotine and carbon monoxide in the uterus increase the risk of intrauterine growth retardation and a low birth weight [37,38]. Then, slow growth during the foetal and infant period could lead to a rapid weight gain and obesity in childhood [39]. Contrastingly, this study showed that maternal smoking could increase the risk of obesity as early as 3 years irrespective of birthweight. The independent effect of maternal smoking from birthweight in this study underscored the epigenetic effect of maternal smoking on obesity. Dissimilar to several studies that reported sex-related differences in the likelihood of obesity [9,40], there was no difference in the effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on childhood obesity by children’s sex in the present study.
The present study also showed that there was additive interaction between maternal active and secondhand smoking, and the odds of obesity further increased when both the exposures were combined: high frequent exposure to both maternal active and secondhand smoking had higher odds of obesity. The odds of childhood obesity associated with secondhand smoking were lower than those associated with maternal smoking during pregnancy, suggesting that maternal smoking might have a greater impact on childhood adiposity due to intrauterine influence [41]. However, the impact of secondhand smoking on child health could be tremendous given its high proportion among pregnant women. These results suggest the importance of adopting measures to simultaneously prevent both maternal active and secondhand smoking to reduce childhood obesity.
The high smoking prevalence among expectant fathers in Japan (>40%) is also concerning [13]; however, its association with obesity disappeared after adjusting for secondhand smoking. Fathers may have avoided smoking at home, but we are unable to know this fact because the place of smoking was not asked in the study.
The present study had several limitations. First, the smoking status of the parents was self-reported; therefore, there might have been underreporting [42,43]. Nonetheless, the smoking status was asked before the outcome was measured. Therefore, the underreporting occurred non-differentially as per the outcome status, and this might have led to an underestimation of the effects of smoking on childhood obesity. Therefore, we believe that underreporting did not influence our conclusions. Second, the intensity of smoking, such as the quantification of cigarette consumption per day, was not measured; therefore, the exposure intensity might differ even among mothers who continued to smoke during pregnancy. There might have been variation in the level of tobacco exposure within the same exposure group in this study. This also applies to the level of exposure to secondhand smoking, as the average time duration of exposure per day was not investigated. Thirdly, only one fifths of participants had undergone anthropometric measurements at well-child visits or hospitals; therefore, there might have been measurement errors. However, there was not a large difference in the distribution of the place of measurement between cases and controls, and the measurement error may have arisen non-differentially. We, therefore, believe that the measurement error did not influence our conclusions. Fourth, a large amount of the study population was excluded due to the lack of anthropometric data. The excluded had a higher prevalence of smoking as well as maternal obesity and were at a lower socioeconomic status compared to those included. Therefore, the study population was biased towards people at less risk of childhood obesity. Finally, the present study did not consider environmental factors after birth such as eating habits during early childhood. It has been reported that children born to mothers who smoke tend to consume more calories [6,44], and nutrition during early life may be related to rapid growth in body weight in early life. However, considering the purpose of the present study was to examine effects of prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke from perspectives of epigenetics, the exclusion of eating habits after birth would be reasonable.
These limitations did not change the interpretation of the association between maternal active and secondhand smoking and childhood obesity in the present study. It is necessary to support cigarette cessation before and during pregnancy to prevent childhood obesity. Measures to prevent secondhand smoking in public and workplaces should also be intensified.

5. Conclusions

Our findings suggested that continuous maternal smoking during pregnancy and exposure to secondhand smoking can increase the risk of childhood obesity at 3 years of age in Japan. It is necessary to support both mothers and family members with cigarette cessation before and during pregnancy to prevent childhood obesity. Measures to prevent secondhand smoking in public and workplaces should also be intensified.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H. and Z.Y.; Methodology, S.H., R.S. and Z.Y.; Formal Analysis, S.H.; Data Curation, S.O. and M.K.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, S.H.; Writing—Review and Editing, R.S., Y.A., T.O., R.K., H.Y., K.M., H.H., K.H., M.S. and Z.Y.; Supervision, Z.Y.; Project Administration, S.O.; Funding Acquisition, Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was funded by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. The findings and conclusions of this study are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the government.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The JECS protocol was approved by the Ministry of the Environment’s Institutional Review Board on Epidemiological Studies (no. 100406001) and approved by the ethics committees of all participating institutions.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data Availability Statement

The data were unsuitable for public deposition due to ethical restrictions and the legal framework of Japan. It is prohibited by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Act no. 57 of 30 May 2003, amended on 9 September 2015) to publicly deposit data containing personal information. Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects enforced by the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare also restrict the open sharing of epidemiologic data. All inquiries about access to data should be sent to [email protected]. Shoji F. Nakayama, JECS Programme Office, National Institute for Environmental Studies, is responsible for handling inquiries sent to this e-mail address.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate all the study participants, research co-ordinators and researchers who worked to maintain the JECS. Members of the JECS Group as of 2021: Michihiro Kamijima (principal investigator, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan), Shin Yamazaki (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan), Yukihiro Ohya (National Centre for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan), Reiko Kishi (Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan), Nobuo Yaegashi (Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan), Koichi Hashimoto (Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan), Chisato Mori (Chiba University, Chiba, Japan), Shuichi Ito (Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan), Zentaro Yamagata (University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan), Hidekuni Inadera (University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan), Takeo Nakayama (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan), Hiroyasu Iso (Osaka University, Suita, Japan), Masayuki Shima (Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan), Youichi Kurozawa (Tottori University, Yonago, Japan), Narufumi Suganuma (Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan), Koichi Kusuhara (University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan) and Takahiko Katoh (Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Facts and Figures on Childhood Obesity. Available online: https://www.who.int/end-childhood-obesity/facts/en/ (accessed on 23 April 2020).
  2. Daniels, S.R. Complications of obesity in children and adolescents. Int. J. Obes. 2009, 33, S60–S65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Oken, E.; Levitan, E.B.; Gillman, M.W. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and child overweight: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Obes. 2008, 32, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Rayfield, S.; Plugge, E. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between maternal smoking in pregnancy and childhood overweight and obesity. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2016, 71, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Riedel, C.; Fenske, N.; Müller, M.J.; Plachta-Danielzik, S.; Keil, T.; Grabenhenrich, L.; von Kries, R. Differences in BMI z-scores between offspring of smoking and nonsmoking mothers: A longitudinal study of German children from birth through 14 years of age. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Whitaker, R.C. Predicting preschooler obesity at birth: The role of maternal obesity in early pregnancy. Pediatrics 2004, 114, e29–e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Adams, A.K.; Harvey, H.E.; Prince, R.J. Association of maternal smoking with overweight at age 3 y in American Indian children. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 82, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oken, E.; Huh, S.Y.; Taveras, E.M.; Rich-Edwards, J.W.; Gillman, M.W. Associations of maternal prenatal smoking with child adiposity and blood pressure. Obes. Res. 2005, 13, 2021–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Suzuki, K.; Ando, D.; Sato, M.; Tanaka, T.; Kondo, N.; Yamagata, Z. The association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and childhood obesity persists to the age of 9–10 years. J. Epidemiol. 2009, 19, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Suzuki, K.; Sato, M.; Zheng, W.; Shinohara, R.; Yokomichi, H.; Yamagata, Z. Childhood Growth Trajectories According to Combinations of Pregestational Weight Status and Maternal Smoking during Pregnancy: A Multilevel Analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118538. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mizutani, T.; Suzuki, K.; Kondo, N.; Yamagata, Z. Association of maternal lifestyles including smoking during pregnancy with childhood obesity. Obesity 2007, 15, 3133–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Qureshi, R.; Jadotte, Y.; Zha, P.; Porter, S.A.; Holly, C.; Salmond, S.; Watkins, E.A. The association between prenatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and childhood obesity: A systematic review. JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement. Rep. 2018, 16, 1643–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Review Meeting Members. Mid-Term Review of the Healthy Parents and Children 21 (2nd Phase) (Japanese only). 2019. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/11901000/000614300.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2020).
  14. Sansone, G.; Fong, G.T.; Meng, G.; Craig, L.V.; Xu, S.S.; Quah, A.C.; Ouimet, J.; Mochizuki, Y.; Yoshimi, I.; Tabuchi, T. Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Public Places and Support for Smoke-Free Laws in Japan: Findings from the 2018 ITC Japan Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kawamoto, T.; Nitta, H.; Murata, K.; Toda, E.; Tsukamoto, N.; Hasegawa, M.; Yamagata, Z.; Kayama, F.; Kishi, R.; Ohya, Y.; et al. Rationale and study design of the Japan environment and children’s study (JECS). BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Nakayama, S.F.; Michikawa, T.; Sekiyama, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Nishihama, Y. Japan environment and children’s study (JECS): Concept, protocol and current status. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 720–728. [Google Scholar]
  17. Michikawa, T.; Nitta, H.; Nakayama, S.F.; Ono, M.; Yonemoto, J.; Tamura, K.; Suda, E.; Ito, H.; Takeuchi, A.; Kawamoto, T. The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS): A preliminary report on selected characteristics of approximately 10,000 pregnant women recruited during the first year of the study. J. Epidemiol. 2015, 25, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Michikawa, T.; Nitta, H.; Nakayama, S.F.; Yamazaki, S.; Isobe, T.; Tamura, K.; Suda, E.; Ono, M.; Yonemoto, J.; Iwai-Shimada, M.; et al. Baseline profile of participants in the Japan environment and children’s study (JECS). J. Epidemiol. 2018, 28, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Siervo, M.; Horta, B.L.; Stephan, B.C.M.; Victora, C.G.; Wells, J.C. First-Borns Carry a Higher Metabolic Risk in Early Adulthood: Evidence from a Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wells, J.C.; Hallal, P.C.; Reichert, F.F.; Dumith, S.C.; Menezes, A.M.; Victora, C.G. Associations of Birth Order With Early Growth and Adolescent Height, Body Composition, and Blood Pressure: Prospective Birth Cohort From Brazil. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 174, 1028–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. World Health Organization. Body Mass Index-for-Age. World Health Organization. 2014. Available online: https://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/bmi_for_age/en/ (accessed on 24 September 2020).
  22. Kong, L.; Nilsson, I.A.K.; Gissler, M.; Lavebratt, C. Associations of Maternal Diabetes and Body Mass Index with Offspring Birth Weight and Prematurity. JAMA Pediatr. 2019, 173, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Longmore, D.K.; Barr, E.L.M.; Lee, I.L.; Barzi, F.; Kirkwood, M.; Whitbread, C.; Hampton, V.; Graham, S.; van Dokkum, P.; Connors, C.; et al. Maternal body mass index, excess gestational weight gain, and diabetes are positively associated with neonatal adiposity in the Pregnancy and Neonatal Diabetes Outcomes in Remote Australia (PANDORA) study. Pediatr. Obes. 2019, 14, e12490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Andres, A.; Hull, H.R.; Shankar, K.; Casey, P.H.; Cleves, M.A.; Badger, T.M. Longitudinal body composition of children born to mothers with normal weight, overweight, and obesity. Obesity 2015, 23, 1252–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Riaz, M.; Lewis, S.; Naughton, F.; Ussher, M. Predictors of smoking cessation during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 2018, 113, 610–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, A.; Machiorlatti, M.; Krebs, N.M.; Muscat, J.E. Socioeconomic differences in nicotine exposure and dependence in adult daily smokers 14 Economics 1402 Applied Economics. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 375. [Google Scholar]
  27. Middleton, P.; Gomersall, J.C.; Gould, J.F.; Shepherd, E.; Olsen, S.F.; Makrides, M. Omega-3 fatty acid addition during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 11, CD003402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Apovian, C.M. Obesity: Definition, comorbidities, causes, and burden. Am. J. Manag. Care 2016, 22, s176–s185. [Google Scholar]
  29. Newton, S.; Braithwaite, D.; Akinyemiju, T.F. Socio-economic status over the life course and obesity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kim, T.J.; Von Dem Knesebeck, O. Income and obesity: What is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e019862. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rolland-Cachera, M.F.; Deheeger, M.; Bellisle, F.; Sempé, M.; Guilloud-Bataille, M.; Patois, E. Adiposity rebound in children: A simple indicator for predicting obesity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1984, 39, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Boeke, C.E.; Mantzoros, C.S.; Hughes, M.D.; Rifas-Shiman, S.; Villamor, E.; Zera, C.A.; Gillman, M.W. Differential associations of leptin with adiposity across early childhood. Obesity 2013, 21, 1430–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Arisaka, O.; Sairenchi, T.; Ichikawa, G.; Koyama, S. Increase of body mass index (BMI) from 1.5 to 3 years of age augments the degree of insulin resistance corresponding to BMI at 12 years of age. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 30, 455–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. World Health Organization. Obesity and Overweight. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed on 13 November 2021).
  35. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare. National Health and Nutrition Survey 2019. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10900000/000687163.pdf (accessed on 13 November 2021).
  36. Ino, T.; Shibuya, T.; Saito, K.; Ohtani, T. Effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on body composition in offspring. Pediatr. Int. 2011, 53, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Secker-Walker, R.H.; Vacek, P.M. Relationships between cigarette smoking during pregnancy, gestational age, maternal weight gain, and infant birthweight. Addict. Behav. 2003, 28, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jauniaux, E.; Burton, G.J. Morphological and biological effects of maternal exposure to tobacco smoke on the feto-placental unit. Early Hum. Dev. 2007, 83, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Barker, D.J.P. Obesity and early life. Obes. Rev. 2007, 8, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Weinheimer, C.; Wang, H.; Comstock, J.M.; Singh, P.; Wang, Z.; Locklear, B.A.; Goodwin, K.L.; Maschek, J.A.; Cox, J.E.; Baack, M.L.; et al. Maternal Tobacco Smoke Exposure Causes Sex-Divergent Changes in Placental Lipid Metabolism in the Rat. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 27, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Riedel, C.; Schönberger, K.; Yang, S.; Koshy, G.; Chen, Y.C.; Gopinath, B.; Ziebarth, S.; von Kries, R. Parental smoking and childhood obesity: Higher effect estimates for maternal smoking in pregnancy compared with paternal smoking—A meta-analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 43, 1593–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Shipton, D.; Tappin, D.M.; Vadiveloo, T.; Crossley, J.A.; Aitken, D.A.; Chalmers, J. Reliability of self reported smoking status by pregnant women for estimating smoking prevalence: A retrospective, cross sectional study. BMJ 2009, 339, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Tong, V.T.; Althabe, F.; Alemán, A.; Johnson, C.C.; Dietz, P.M.; Berrueta, M.; Morello, P.; Colomar, M.; Buekens, P.; Sosnoff, C.S.; et al. Accuracy of self-reported smoking cessation during pregnancy. Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2015, 94, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cummings, J.R.; Gearhardt, A.N.; Miller, A.L.; Hyde, L.W.; Lumeng, J.C. Maternal nicotine dependence is associated with longitudinal increases in child obesogenic eating behaviors. Pediatr. Obes. 2019, 14, e12541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Selection of study participants.
Figure 1. Selection of study participants.
Ijerph 18 12506 g001
Table 1. Comparison of characteristics of children whose heights and weights were measured and not measured at 3 years of age.
Table 1. Comparison of characteristics of children whose heights and weights were measured and not measured at 3 years of age.
VariableNot Measured
(n = 30,548)
Measured
(n = 67,865)
p-Value
(chi-Square)
Maternal smoking during pregnancy
   Never or quit smoking before pregnancy21,300 (69.7)57,039 (84.1)<0.001
   Quit smoking after pregnancy5249 (17.2)7885 (11.6)
   Continue smoking2241 (7.3)2180 (3.2)
   Missing data1758 (5.8)761 (1.1)
Paternal smoking during pregnancy
   Never or quit smoking before pregnancy12,079 (39.5)35,708 (52.6)<0.001
   Quit smoking after pregnancy872 (2.9)1894 (2.8)
   Continue smoking15,368 (50.3)28,974 (42.7)
   Missing data2229 (7.3)1289 (1.9)
Exposure to secondhand smoking before pregnancy
   Rare12,865 (42.1)35,384 (52.1)<0.001
   Several times per week9435 (30.9)21,360 (31.5)
   Everyday7077 (23.2)10,547 (15.5)
   Missing data1171 (3.8)574 (0.9)
Exposure to secondhand smoking during pregnancy
   Rare16,207 (53.1)43,748 (64.5)<0.001
   Several times per week7622 (25.0)16,403 (24.2)
   Everyday5233 (17.1)7202 (10.6)
   Missing data1486 (4.9)512 (0.8)
Child sex
   Male15,740 (51.5)34,694 (51.1)
   Female14,790 (48.4)33,171 (48.9)
   Unknown3 (0.01)-
   Missing15 (0.1)-
Birthweight (g)2997.8 [469.2]3034.5 [394.9]<0.001 *
Gestational week at birth (week)38.6 [2.0]38.9 [1.4]<0.001 *
Breastfeeding during first 6 months
   Exclusive8257 (27.0)24,935 (36.7)<0.001
   Mixed15,594 (51.1)40,841 (60.2)
   Formula808 (2.7)1275 (1.9)
   Missing data5889 (19.3)814 (1.2)
Attendance to nursery school by 1 year of age
   Yes5372 (17.6)18,382 (27.1)<0.001
   No16,720 (54.7)47,973 (70.7)
   Missing data8456 (27.7)1510 (2.2)
Maternal age at entry (year)29.8 [5.3]31.2 [4.9]<0.001 *
Maternal job type at conception
   Employed17,392 (56.9)43,743 (64.5)<0.001
   Housewife8974 (29.4)18,777 (27.7)
   Students, unemployed or others2121 (6.9)3367 (5.0)
   Missing data2061 (6.8)1978 (2.9)
Maternal educational attainment
   Elementary to junior high-school13,766 (45.1)22,756 (33.5)<0.001
   Under-graduate14,876 (48.7)43,341 (63.9)
   Post-graduate279 (0.9)1131 (1.7)
   Missing data1627 (5.3)637 (0.9)
Income (million yen)
   <4 12,306 (40.3)23,843 (35.1)<0.001
   4–68242 (27.0)21,430 (31.6)
   6–83463 (11.3)10,832 (16.0)
   ≥82310 (7.6)7384 (10.9)
   Missing data4227 (13.8)4376 (6.5)
Marital status at registration
   Married27,627 (90.4)64,892 (95.6)<0.001
   Single, divorced or widowed1802 (5.9)2408 (3.6)
   Missing data1119 (3.7)565 (0.8)
Maternal BMI before pregnancy (kg/m2)21.5 [3.6]21.1 [3.2]
   <18.5 (underweight)5002 (16.4)10,911 (16.1)<0.001
   18.5–25 (normal)21,530 (70.5)50,371 (74.2)
   25–30 (overweight)2912 (9.5)5076 (7.5)
   ≥30 (obesity)1017 (3.3)1465 (2.2)
   Missing data87 (0.3)42 (0.1)
Maternal drinking during pregnancy
   No9512 (31.1)22,656 (33.4)<0.001
   Quit 18,415 (60.3)42,610 (62.8)
   Continue904 (3.0)1802 (2.7)
   Missing data1717 (5.6)797 (1.2)
Maternal diabetes or gestational diabetes
   No29,291 (95.9)65,756 (96.9)0.448
   Yes968 (3.2)2109 (3.1)
   Missing data289 (0.9)-
Values are number (%) or mean [SD]; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; * t-test was applied.
Table 2. Characteristics of the study participants (n = 24,366).
Table 2. Characteristics of the study participants (n = 24,366).
VariableCases (n = 4875)Controls (n = 19,491)
Maternal smoking during pregnancy
   Never or quit smoking before pregnancy3971 (81.5)16,458 (84.4)
   Quit smoking after pregnancy669 (13.7)2290 (11.8)
   Continue smoking188 (3.9)565 (2.9)
   Missing data47 (1.0)178 (0.9)
Paternal smoking during pregnancy
   Never or quit smoking before pregnancy2417 (49.6)10,260 (52.6)
   Quit smoking after pregnancy128 (2.6)550 (2.8)
   Continue smoking2245 (46.1)8338 (42.8)
   Missing data85 (1.7)343 (1.8)
Exposure to secondhand smoking before pregnancy
   Rare2385 (48.9)10,250 (52.6)
   Several times per week1601 (32.8)6188 (31.8)
   Everyday875 (18.0)2988 (15.3)
   Missing data14 (0.3)65 (0.3)
Exposure to secondhand smoking during pregnancy
   Rare2942 (60.4)12,587 (64.6)
   Several times per week1272 (26.1)4677 (24.0)
   Everyday633 (13.0)2119 (10.8)
   Missing data28 (0.6)108 (0.6)
Child sex
   Male2562 (52.6)10,309 (52.9)
   Female2313 (47.5)9182 (47.1)
Birthweight (g) 13182.5 [391.8]3123.6 [389.0]
Gestational week at birth (week) 138.9 [1.4]39.0 [1.3]
Breastfeeding during first 6 months
   Exclusive1689 (34.7)7238 (37.1)
   Mixed3006 (61.7)11,662 (59.8)
   Formula124 (2.5)365 (1.9)
   Missing data56 (1.2)226 (1.2)
Attendance to nursery school by 1 year of age
   Yes1441 (29.6)5290 (27.1)
   No3316 (68.0)13,780 (70.7)
   Missing data118 (2.4)421 (2.2)
Adiposity rebound before 3 years of age
   No2030 (41.6)13,242 (67.9)
   Yes2645 (54.3)5519 (28.3)
   Missing data200 (4.1)730 (3.8)
Maternal age at entry (year) 131.1 [4.9]31.2 [4.8]
Maternal job type at conception
   Employed3213 (65.9)12,633 (64.8)
   Housewife1305 (26.8)5530 (28.4)
   Students, unemployed or others225 (4.6)893 (4.6)
   Missing data132 (2.7)435 (2.2)
Maternal educational level
   Elementary to junior high-school1772 (36.4)6506 (33.4)
   Under-graduate2984 (61.2)12,501 (64.1)
   Post-graduate81 (1.7)341 (1.8)
   Missing data38 (0.8)143 (0.7)
Income (million yen)
   <4 1743 (35.8)6831 (35.1)
   4–61513 (31.0)6145 (31.5)
   6–8784 (16.1)3123 (16.0)
   ≥8519 (10.6)2177 (11.0)
   Missing data316 (6.5)1215 (6.2)
Maternal BMI before pregnancy (kg/m2)22.2 (3.8)21.2 (3.2)
   <18.5 (underweight)434 (8.9)3002 (15.4)
   18.5–25 (normal)3629 (74.4)14,541 (74.6)
   25–30 (overweight)583 (12.0)1511 (7.8)
   ≥30 (obesity)227 (4.7)431 (2.2)
   Missing data2 (0.1)6 (0.1)
Maternal drinking during pregnancy
   No1584 (32.5)6499 (33.3)
   Quit 3131 (64.2)12,260 (62.9)
   Continue121 (2.5)535 (2.7)
   Missing data39 (0.8)197 (1.0)
Maternal fish intake during pregnancy
   Less than once a month1005 (20.6)3827 (19.6)
   Several times a month1071 (22.0)4663 (23.9)
   Once a week1186 (24.3)4781 (24.5)
   More than once a week1559 (32.0)6014 (30.9)
   Missing data54 (1.1)206 (1.1)
Values are number (%) or mean [SD]; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index. 1 p-values of t-tests to compare means between cases and controls produced were <0.001 for birth weight and gestational week at birth, and 0.228 for maternal age at entry.
Table 3. Odds ratios of being obese at 3 years of age in relation with maternal smoking during pregnancy and other variables with conditional logistic regression models (n = 24,366).
Table 3. Odds ratios of being obese at 3 years of age in relation with maternal smoking during pregnancy and other variables with conditional logistic regression models (n = 24,366).
Smoking Status during PregnancyCrude OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR a
(95% CI)
n = 17,788
Maternal smoking during pregnancy
   Never or quit smoking before pregnancy1.001.00
   Quit smoking after pregnancy1.22 (1.11–1.35)1.14 (0.95–1.37)
   Continue smoking1.40 (1.18–1.65)1.39 (1.01–1.92)
Paternal smoking during pregnancy
   Never or quit smoking before pregnancy1.001.00
   Quit smoking after pregnancy0.98 (0.81–1.20)0.86 (0.61–1.21)
   Continue smoking1.15 (1.08–1.23)1.03 (0.91–1.17)
Exposure to secondhand smoking before pregnancy
   Seldom1.00 - b
   Several times per week1.12 (1.04–1.20)-
   Everyday1.27 (1.16–1.38)-
Exposure to secondhand smoking during pregnancy
   Seldom1.001.00
   Several times per week1.17 (1.09–1.26)1.14 (0.99–1.30)
   Everyday1.29 (1.17–1.42)1.23 (1.01–1.50)
BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratios; CI, confidence interval. a Adjusted for all other variables in the table, child sex, breastfeeding, attendance to nursery school by 1 year of age, adiposity rebound before 3 years of age, maternal job type at conception, maternal educational level, income, maternal BMI before pregnancy (kg/m2), maternal drinking during pregnancy, maternal fish intake during pregnancy, birthweight (continuous variable), maternal age at entry (continuous variable) and gestational week at birth (continuous variable). b Omitted from the multivariable analysis due to collinearity with exposure to secondhand smoking during pregnancy.
Table 4. Odds ratios of being obese at 3 years of age in relation with combination of maternal active and secondhand smoking during pregnancy (n = 17,824).
Table 4. Odds ratios of being obese at 3 years of age in relation with combination of maternal active and secondhand smoking during pregnancy (n = 17,824).
Maternal Smoking during PregnancyExposure to Secondhand Smoking during Pregnancy
SeldomSeveral Times per WeekEveryday
Never or quit smoking before pregnancy1.001.11 (0.97–1.27)1.23 (0.98–1.55)
Quit smoking after pregnancy1.11 (0.97–1.27)1.30 (0.98–1.73)1.59 (1.17–2.15)
Continue smoking1.23 (0.98–1.55)1.59 (1.17–2.15)1.60 (1.06–2.39)
Values are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals). Adjusted for paternal smoking during pregnancy, child sex, breastfeeding, attendance to nursery school by 1 year of age, adiposity rebound before 3 years of age, maternal job type at conception, maternal educational level, income, maternal BMI before pregnancy (kg/m2), maternal drinking during pregnancy, maternal fish intake during pregnancy, birthweight (continuous variable), maternal age at entry (continuous variable) and gestational week at birth (continuous variable).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Horiuchi, S.; Shinohara, R.; Otawa, S.; Kushima, M.; Akiyama, Y.; Ooka, T.; Kojima, R.; Yokomichi, H.; Miyake, K.; Hirai, H.; et al. Influence of Maternal Active and Secondhand Smoking during Pregnancy on Childhood Obesity at 3 Years of Age: A Nested Case–Control Study from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12506. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312506

AMA Style

Horiuchi S, Shinohara R, Otawa S, Kushima M, Akiyama Y, Ooka T, Kojima R, Yokomichi H, Miyake K, Hirai H, et al. Influence of Maternal Active and Secondhand Smoking during Pregnancy on Childhood Obesity at 3 Years of Age: A Nested Case–Control Study from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(23):12506. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312506

Chicago/Turabian Style

Horiuchi, Sayaka, Ryoji Shinohara, Sanae Otawa, Megumi Kushima, Yuka Akiyama, Tadao Ooka, Reiji Kojima, Hiroshi Yokomichi, Kunio Miyake, Hiroyuki Hirai, and et al. 2021. "Influence of Maternal Active and Secondhand Smoking during Pregnancy on Childhood Obesity at 3 Years of Age: A Nested Case–Control Study from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS)" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 23: 12506. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312506

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop