Next Article in Journal
Can Exhaled Carbon Monoxide Be Used as a Marker of Exposure? A Cross-Sectional Study in Young Adults
Next Article in Special Issue
Scar Tissue after a Cesarean Section—The Management of Different Complications in Pregnant Women
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Fast Test Based on Biometric Signals to Assess Mental Fatigue at the Workplace—A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Determinants of Psychosocial Resilience Resources in Obese Pregnant Women with Threatened Preterm Labor—A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 22
10.3390/ijerph182211892
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Readiness for Birth Control in Improving Women Health Status: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Modern Contraceptives Methods for Family Planning Practices

by
Adnan Muhammad Shah
1,2,3,
KangYoon Lee
1,* and
Javaria Nisa Mir
4
1
Department of Computing Engineering, Gachon University, Seoul 13120, Korea
2
Department of Management Sciences, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology, Islamabad 44320, Pakistan
3
Charles E. Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA
4
Faculty of Management Science, Riphah International University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(22), 11892; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211892
Submission received: 15 September 2021 / Revised: 5 November 2021 / Accepted: 5 November 2021 / Published: 12 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Obstetrics and Gynecology in Public Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Pakistan is the world’s sixth most populated country, with a population of approximately 208 million people. Despite this, just 25% of legitimate couples say they have used modern contraceptive methods. A large body of literature has indicated that sexual satisfaction is a complex and multifaceted concept, since it involves physical and cultural components. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of influencing factors in terms of contraceptive self-efficacy (CSE), contraceptive knowledge, and spousal communication on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for family planning (FP) under the moderating role of perceived barriers. Methods: Data were collected using an adopted questionnaire issued to married women of reproductive age belonging to the Rawalpindi and Neelum Valley regions in Pakistan. The sample consisted of 250 married women of reproductive age. SPSS was used to analyze the respondents’ feedback. Results: The findings draw public attention towards CSE, contraceptive knowledge, and spousal communication, because these factors can increase the usage of modern methods for FP among couples, leading to a reduction in unwanted pregnancies and associated risks. Regarding the significant moderation effect of perceived barriers, if individuals (women) are highly motivated (CSE) to overcome perceived barriers by convincing their husbands to use contraceptives, the probability to adopt modern contraceptive methods for FP practices is increased. Conclusions: Policymakers should formulate strategies for the involvement of males by designing male-oriented FP program interventions and incorporating male FP workers to reduce communication barriers between couples. Future research should address several other important variables, such as the desire for additional child, myths/misconceptions, fear of side effects, and partner/friend discouragement, which also affect the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices.

1. Background

Pakistan is the world’s sixth most populated country, with a population of 208 million people at the time of writing [1]. The Pakistani government is concerned about population growth because it is related to economic and social consequences of unrestrained expansion [2,3]. Failure to control the rate of reproduction and rapid population expansion has negative consequences for development indices such as education, poverty, and life expectancy, especially for mother and child health [4]. Beginning in the 1960s, the country became a pioneer in the field of family planning (FP) among developing countries. Fifty years later, the program is still struggling to increase the use of modern contraceptives. The current contraceptive prevalence rate in Pakistan is 34%, compared to 62% in India and 56% in Bangladesh [5,6]. For years, the low and stagnant prevalence of contraception in Pakistan has been a source of academic debate [7]. Much has been written about Pakistan’s sluggish adoption of modern contraception methods, highlighting cultural hurdles, inconsistent political support, and service delivery failures [7,8]. The majority of the research has focused on service delivery problems, with the assumption that increasing contraceptive provision would improve contraceptive use [8,9,10,11].
The gradual increase in contraceptive rates in Pakistan compared to other nations in the region has been a hotly debated topic among demographers and other academics, with many speculating that inconsistencies in political support and a lackluster FP policy are to blame [11,12]. Researchers recommend that communication between couples should be encouraged because it increases the adoption of FP practices [13,14,15]. A recent study indicated that there is a need for modern contraceptive prevalence in Pakistan, which requires an increased uptake of contraceptives (National Institute of Population Studies (NIPS)) [16]. Pakistan has been facing the issue of FP for decades [17]. About 17% of married women in Pakistan have modern contraceptive prevalence for FP, and this rate is higher among rural areas. The demand for FP has reduced over the last 5 years, currently at 52% whilst it was 55% in 2012–2013. Pakistan has a 34% contraceptive prevalence rate, and the use of modern contraceptive methods has not increased since 2013 [16]. The literature shows that knowledge on contraceptives has profound effects on the FP practices [18]. Due to a lack of appropriate knowledge about contraceptive methods, women cannot get desired results [19].
Women’s self-efficacy and knowledge about the appropriate use and the side effects of contraceptive methods, a couple’s communication, and combined decisions are positive predictors of contraceptive use [20]. Women’s education and power to make decisions are significantly associated with the use of contraceptives [21]. Previous literature has indicated low contraceptive use in Pakistan, and there is an urgent need to explore factors which can help to improve FP practices and modern contraceptive prevalence necessary for FP practices [22]. Contraceptive self-efficacy (CSE), contraceptive knowledge, and spousal communication are found to be associated with FP practices [23]. Self-efficacy theory suggests that an individual’s belief in his own competence to perfectly perform any behavior is affected by several moderators and barriers, either personal or social [24]. Therefore, researchers have suggested that while assessing self-efficacy, the impact of perceived barriers on health behavior estimation must be examined [25]. Researchers have also reported several reasons for why improving contraceptive knowledge might improve contraceptive use [26]. Spousal communication is the determinant of FP practices, but there is need to assess this connection in the context of developing countries [13]. Because a lack of communication and counselling is affecting couples’ and women’s decision-making ability regarding fertility preferences [14], the current study attempts to assess the impact of these variables on women’s perceptions regarding the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices.
Numerous economists and researchers continue to doubt Pakistan’s ability to significantly boost the adoption of modern FP practices because of religious norms, social liberalism, and preferences for large family systems. Therefore, several gaps are observed in the policies and structure of programs related to FP practices in Pakistan [8,11] and other developing regions [27,28]. The unavailability of contraceptives, especially in rural areas, users’ dissatisfaction, low service quality, lack of proper guidance concerning the methods selected, religious factors, and a lack of knowledge, funding, and collaboration between public and private sector facilities providing FP services have been quoted as barriers that cause a low prevalence of contraceptive measures [10,17]. Since the context of this study is Pakistan, it is worth noting that FP in Pakistan is entirely female-oriented [29]. Programs that target only a single sex tend to fail to achieve its targets [13]. Therefore, all these issues need to be investigated, because they are affecting population control activities in the country. The theoretical foundation of this study is based on a combined health belief model, social cognitive theory, and the theory of planned behavior. In this regard, this study attempts to examine different predictors in the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices. This study will provide a thorough understanding of these factors, which will be helpful for the control of fertility.
The current study aims to explore the impact of spousal communication, contraceptive knowledge, and CSE on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices in a developing country context, such as Pakistan. In addition, the moderating role of perceived barriers is, for the first time, theorized and tested to determine the relationship between contraceptive knowledge, spousal communication, CSE, and the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices. The findings of the current study would be helpful for policymakers in implementing and revising policies to further improve FP programs.
The rest of the sections in the current study are arranged as follows: Section 2 presents a literature review and hypotheses; Section 3 covers the proposed methodology, including sample and data collection, the measurement of variables, common method bias, and control variables; Section 4 explains the data analysis and results; finally, Section 5 discusses the results of the study, sheds light on practical implications, and recommends a direction for future research.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Contraceptive Self-Efficacy (CSE) and Family Planning (FP) Practices

Levinson, as cited in [30], defined CSE as “it is the strength of a young woman’s conviction that she should and could exercise control within sexual and contraceptive situations to prevent an unintended pregnancy, if that is what she desires” (p. 9). Following the self-efficacy theory, the concept of CSE was developed to measure women’s self-efficacy and its impact on their reproductive health. The extant literature indicates that women with higher self-efficacy are more independent in the selection and practice of modern contraceptive methods [31,32]. CSE is important because it stimulates individual behavior related to the use of modern contraceptives, therefore helping to prevent major public health issues by prompting the use of modern contraceptives [31]. Contraceptive acceptance is higher among females with higher CSE [33,34,35]. CSE enables women to manage all resistance related to FP practices [25]. Findings from previous research also reveal that CSE increases contraceptive adherence [20]. The above explanations suggest that CSE is a strong predictor of the use of modern contraceptive for FP practices. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that:
Hypothesis 1 (H1).
Contraceptive self-efficacy has a positive impact on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices.

2.2. Contraceptive Knowledge and Family Planning (FP) Practices

Contraceptive knowledge was defined by Nsubuga et al. [36] as “the state of awareness of contraceptive methods, any specific types and the source of contraceptive”. Contraceptive knowledge enables women to easily access FP services [37]. It is reported that counselling increases contraceptive awareness, which modifies people’s attitudes towards the use of contraceptives [38]. Efficient contraceptive knowledge helps in changing people’s perceptions and decisions about FP [39]. Researchers have also found that educated women are more aware of contraceptive methods and FP practices, which ultimately increases the use of contraceptives among females [40]. It is also reported that females with good contraceptive knowledge practiced different methods effectively [41]. In contrast, individuals with a lack of contraceptive knowledge will discontinue contraceptive use due to its side effects or method failures [42]. According to a recent survey, 3/4th of the overall urban population is aware of FP practices, but a low level of awareness among rural population was reported [16]. Well-aware and knowledgeable individuals regarding different contraceptive methods have a tendency to solve different FP issues [43,44,45], such as intercourse and the method not changing the woman’s menstrual periods [46], intrauterine device and implant [47], and female sterilization [48].
Contraceptive knowledge in terms of awareness about the available contraceptive methods helps people in choosing the best and effective contraceptives practices, and also changes people’s fertility preferences [49]. It has been noted that people who are aware of implants and breastfeeding as contraceptive methods were more interested in the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices [50]. Studies in the context of a developing country, such as Pakistan, highlighted the gap between contraceptive knowledge and FP practice [17,51]. This gap is because of a lack of knowledge about the benefits and availability, as well as misinformation, of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices. Major sources delivering contraceptive knowledge include healthcare centers, friends, family, and media [52]. Therefore, based on the available literature, it can be hypothesized that:
Hypothesis 2 (H2).
Contraceptive knowledge has a positive impact on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices.

2.3. Spousal Communication and Family Planning (FP) Practices

Backman, as cited in [53], stated that “spousal communication in the marital dyad is generally defined as the frequency of discussion between spouses, as reported by one or both partners” (p. 5). Communication between spouses plays an important role in the continuous adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices. Partner communication appeared as a topic of interest regarding FP practices. In this regard, researchers found a positive association between spousal communication and FP practices [54,55,56]. Another study reported husbands as key decision makers for getting access to health and FP services. A husband’s education level is significantly associated with the current use of contraceptives. The location of service providers, the quality of services, women’s age, and financial status also determine the use of contraceptives [4].
FALAH (Family Advancement for Life and Health) is already working on male involvement in FP programs. An analysis of program outcomes found that engaging Pakistani men in FP practices to support and encourage their wives to use FP services and introducing male contraceptive methods can increase the utilization and acceptance of FP practices among the population [57]. Similarly, Khan et al. [58] stated that husband approval is a strong predictor of the use of contraceptives. Spousal communication helps in coping with psychological barriers and reduces emotional strains that discourage the use of contraceptives [59]. It helps couples in decision making concerning an appropriate family size, and enhances positive intentions towards modern contraceptive methods for FP practices. Thus, it can be hypothesized that:
Hypothesis 3 (H3).
Spousal communication has a positive impact on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices.

2.4. Moderating Role of Perceived Barriers

Glasgow [60] defined perceived barriers as “A person’s estimation of the level of challenge of social, personal, environmental, and economic obstacles to a specified behavior” (p. 1). In the literature, the concept of perceived barriers has been extensively used with the health belief model (HBM). Perceived barriers have been used in many theories, including HBM, social cognitive theory, and social-ecological theory [60]. The integrated impact of multiple barriers hamper women from accessing reproductive health services. The restricted mobility of women by family [42] and a lack of communication between couples are factors that hamper women from using contraceptives [61]. Additionally, barriers restrain women’s ability to practice contraceptive methods. Most of the time, women that desire to limit their fertility by using contraceptives are influenced by religious and cultural hindrances [11,62]. They have to face great resistance from social barriers comparative to financial issues [63,64].
Women’s perceptions about contraceptive use, fear of their husbands’ negative response, and FP practices are perceived as an unacceptable act by society; therefore, culture limits the use of contraceptives among women [65]. Another study conducted by researchers in Pakistan declared that reasons for not using contraceptives include a desire for a baby boy (19%), fear of a health risk (29%), and lack of partner support and consideration of them as un-Islamic (14%); similar findings were found in other studies [66,67]. Interpersonal violence [68], cost, shyness, desire for a baby boy and a large family size [69], fear of sin, sterility [70], misinterpretation, husband and in-laws disapproval, prevailing myths, and social norms are all factors that contribute to the low intention of adopting of FP practices [66,71].
Fear of privacy breach, stigmatization, and FP service providers’ attitudes negatively affect the adoption of modern FP practices among women, despite them having knowledge about contraceptive use [72,73]. Spousal communication increases FP practices, but in-laws’ pressure, low parity, and administrative issues weaken this relationship [74]. Men’s disinterest and lack of knowledge about contraceptives, female financially dependency, and physical violence discourage women to communicate with their husbands about FP practices, which ultimately causes the low prevalence or lack of use of contraceptive methods [75]. Despite having information about several available FP methods, a low use of contraceptives has been noted among couples of rural areas due to misconceptions about risks associated with contraceptive methods [76]. Family environments also define women’s behavior towards FP practices [77]. A woman’s autonomy to make decisions about any aspect of her life is strongly influenced by the stratified family structure [78]. All these barriers contribute towards modern contraceptive prevalence for FP practices, in which women do not want to conceive for a period of time but still do not use any contraceptives [79]. Based on the above literature, it is argued whether perceived barriers act as moderator in the relationship between CSE, contraceptive knowledge, spousal communication, and FP practices or not. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that:
Hypothesis 4 (H4).
Perceived barriers moderate the relationship between contraceptive self-efficacy and the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices.
Hypothesis 5 (H5).
Perceived barriers moderate the relationship between contraceptive knowledge and the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices.
Hypothesis 6 (H6).
Perceived barriers moderate the relationship between spousal communication and the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices.
The research model of the study is presented in Figure 1.

3. Methodology

3.1. Sample and Data Collection

Women of reproductive age are the main target of FP practices in Pakistan due to higher needs for the use of contraceptives at this age. The adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP is a key variable in current research. Using a convenience sampling technique, data were collected from married women of reproductive age from the Rawalpindi and Neelum Valley regions in Pakistan through distributed questionnaires. Convenience sampling has the advantages of being inexpensive, efficient, and easy to use. We selected the aforementioned sampling locations because both these regions are highly prevalent in terms of FP practices. Additionally, the travel restrictions implemented during the COVID-19 outbreak made it difficult for the authors to visit other areas for data collection. We decided to collect data using both self-administered questionnaires and social circles from these areas to distribute our questionnaire to the relevant samples. A cover letter was attached, declaring the purpose of the research and asking participants at the time they join the study for relevant and historical information on spousal communication and decision making regarding FP practices. A screening question was also placed at the beginning of the survey to clearly ask whether respondents belonged to these regions and they knew the contraceptive methods used in FP practices. Confidentiality, anonymity, and voluntary participation were also ensured.
A total number of 340 questionnaires were distributed. The authors believe that the sampling size was appropriate due to the COVID-19 restrictions and respondents’ hesitation to respond to specific questions because of cultural and religious beliefs [11]. Out of the 292 questionnaires that were returned 42 were not useable, making the valid response rate 73.5%. The contraceptive prevalence rate in our sample was 41.28%.
As shown in Table 1, the majority of the women participants were literate (86.8%), most were non-working (63.6%), the majority of the women were in the age range of 24 to 35 years (78.3%), and the majority of the women got married in the age range of 18–25 years (72%). Most of the participants were residents of a rural area (70%), and most were Muslim (95.6%). The majority of the participants’ husbands were literate (95.2%) and working (97.2%). Of the respondents, 48% of them had a maximum of two–three children and (25%) had four or more children. Of the women, 92% of them reported having a good health status and 72.4% reported that their husbands were the head of the household. Of the respondents, 62.3% responded that their husbands were highly involvement in decision making regarding pregnancy, while 64.8% responded that they have spousal communication regarding FP and birth spacing.

3.2. Measurements

All the study variables were measured on a 5-point Likert scale. All constructs were measured on a Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agree = 5.
Constructs such as contraceptive self-efficacy (CSE) were measured using a 7-item scale developed by Prata et al. [80]. One sample item which was measured was “I can use a modern contraceptive method to prevent pregnancy”. Contraceptive knowledge (CK) was measured by using a 7-item scale developed by Lincoln et al. [81]. One sample item which was measured was “I am aware that health education is important for women who want to use contraception”. Spousal communication (SC) was measured using a 5-item scale developed by Wegs et al. [82]. One sample item which was measured was “I and my spouse discuss things that happened during the day”. Modern FP practices were measured using a 7-item scale developed by Lincoln, Mohammadnezhad, and Khan [81]. One sample item which was measured was “I often use one of the contraceptives to prevent unplanned pregnancy”. Perceived barriers (PB) were measured using a 14-item scale developed by Sen et al. [83]. One sample item which was measured was “Contraceptive measures are too expensive for me”. The details of all constructs and their corresponding items are presented in Appendix A, Table A1. According to the criteria defined by Fornell and Larcker [84], the composite reliability values for all constructs were above the threshold (i.e., 0.70).

3.3. Common Method Bias

A common bias test was performed by taking into account Harman’s single factor [85]. Five constructs with their corresponding non-removed items were tested using an exploratory factor analysis by Harman’s single-factor test and analyzed with an unrotated factor solution. It was shown that there is no question about the common method bias in the current research data due to no emerging factor being reported, and 41.451% (less than 50%) variance was documented for the first factor, as suggested by Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, and Podsakoff [85].

3.4. Control Variables

A one-way ANOVA was performed to control the variation in the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices on the basis of demographic variables used in the study. Results obtained from one-way ANOVA (see Table 2) indicated no significant differences in the adoption of contraceptive methods for FP practices (dependent variable) across qualification (F = 0.880, p > 0.05), profession (F = 3.371, p > 0.05), age at time of marriage (F = 2.881, p > 0.05), religion (F = 1.495, p > 0.05), health status (F = 1.267, p > 0.05), husband’s qualification (F = 1.496, p > 0.05), husband’s profession (F = 0.897, p > 0.05), and head of household (F = 0.399, p > 0.05).
At the same time, the one-way ANOVA indicated significant differences in FP across region (F = 19.089, p < 0.05), area of residence (F = 19.089, p < 0.05), current age (F = 2.682, p < 0.05), and number of children (F = 7.984, p < 0.05). Subsequently, factors identified as significant were entered as control variables in step 1 of a regression analysis for a single dependent variable.

4. Results

Means, standard deviations, scale reliabilities (bold diagonal entries), and correlation matrices are presented in Table 3. Reliabilities for all constructs were greater than the cutoff value (i.e., α ≥ 0.7), which indicates acceptable reliability [86]. The results also revealed that all the absolute values of the correlation coefficients and the VIF statistics for each individual variable are less than 0.5 and 10, respectively [86]. Hence, multicollinearity is not a serious problem in the study, and the results are reliable. Table 3 also indicates that CSE is significantly positively correlated with modern FP practices (r = 0.48, p < 0.01) providing support for proposed hypothesis 1. Contraceptive knowledge is significantly positively correlated with modern FP practices (r = 0.34, p < 0.01), which provides support for proposed hypothesis 2. Modern FP practices are significantly positively correlated with spousal communication (r = 0.22, p < 0.01), which provides support for proposed hypothesis 3. Perceived barriers are not correlated with modern FP practices (r = 0.092, p = ns). Control variables, such as area of residence, region, current age, and number of children are positively correlated with modern FP practices.
A multiple regression analysis was run to check the relationship between variables in the proposed model of this study. Table 4 shows the results of the regression analysis for the controls, direct effects, and moderating variable. The findings reveal that control variables, such as area of residence (β = 0.126, p < 0.01), region (β = 0.256, p < 0.05), current age (β = 0.325, p < 0.01), and number of children (β = 0.258, p < 0.05) significantly influence modern FP practices. The results show a significant positive impact of CSE on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices (β = 0.551, p < 0.001). Thus, hypothesis 1 is accepted. The regression analysis shows that there is a significant positive impact of contraceptive knowledge on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices as (β = 0.226, p < 0.01); thus, hypothesis 2 is accepted. In addition, the results indicate that spousal communication has a significant positive impact on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices as (β = 0.184, p < 0.01), thus leading towards the acceptance of hypothesis 3. Analysis shows that perceived barriers have no significant direct effect on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices as (β = 0.049, p = ns).
Hypotheses 4, 5, and 6 were tested using moderated regression analysis. Where control variables were entered in step 1, independent and moderator variables were entered in step 2, and interaction terms were entered in step 3. Results show that in the third step after incorporating for interaction terms, such as contraceptive self-efficacy×perceived barriers, the results (β = 0.168, p < 0.05) lead to the rejection of hypothesis 4, that higher perceived barriers weaken the relationship between contraceptive self-efficacy and the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices in such a way that the relationship is weaker when the perceived barrier is high.
Result shows that FP practices in women with high CSE will be higher even in the presence of high perceived barriers. In addition, regression analysis shows that by incorporating interaction terms in the model for contraceptive knowledge×perceived barriers (β = −0.020, p = ns) and for spousal communication×perceived barriers (β = 0.037, p = ns) in the model, hypotheses 5 and 6 are not accepted. These results indicate that perceived barriers are not moderating the relationship between contraceptive knowledge and the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices or that between spousal communication and the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices.
The interaction effect in Figure 2 shows that the relationship between CSE and the adoption of modern FP practices was stronger in the presence of high perceived barriers (in dashed red line) than in the presence of low perceived barriers (in solid blue line); thus, hypothesis 4 is rejected.

5. Discussion

The purpose of this study was to investigate the causal effect of different factors (i.e., CSE, contraceptive knowledge, and spousal communication) that influence the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices. Additionally, the moderating role of perceived barriers was also examined in the relationships between aforementioned constructs [31,32]. The findings were in support of previous studies conducted by scholars [20,25], where similar findings were reported.
Contraceptive knowledge as awareness was found to have a significant positive impact on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices. These findings were in line with previous studies findings [37,40]. This is because contraceptive knowledge among women encourages them to adopt modern methods for FP services and choose suitable method for practice. A good level of contraceptive knowledge improves the modern contraceptive prevalence. Contraceptive knowledge modifies people’s perceptions about FP practices [39]. Furthermore, the majority respondents were literate, so they valued contraceptive knowledge as an important factor for FP practices. Thus, it is quite logical to infer that the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP in Pakistan can be enhanced by increasing comprehensive knowledge about contraceptive measures among women.
Similarly, spousal communication also has a positive impact on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices. Spousal communication is an effective way to involve males in FP practices and support women’s decisions about fertility preferences. Partner support and encouragement is a key determinant of FP practices [87]. The current findings were in line with previous studies [54,55,56,88]. As discussed in the literature, good spousal communication and encouragement by their partners allows women to make decisions about desired family size, usability, selection, and awareness of all available FP methods, which results in a reduction in contraceptive discontinuation and their low prevalence. This situation usually happens because of public dissatisfaction and a fear of opposition. Introducing male-oriented FP methods could help in increasing the uptake of FP practices by couples.
The results of moderated regression analysis show that the relationship between CSE and the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices is moderated by perceived barriers. Since the perceived barriers were used as moderators between the relationship of CSE and modern FP practices for the first time, the findings of the current study are supported by evidence from previous studies [20,25,61], where they declared that women with higher CSE are motivated and can convince men to use contraceptives. The adoption of any health behavior is dependent on individuals’ intentions to adopt that specific behavior. If an individual has strong intentions to practice or adopt a specific health behavior as well as the self-efficacy to overcome his/her perceived obstacles, the probability to adopt a specific health behavior increases [89,90]. As in the current study, participants reported higher CSE; therefore, the presence of barriers cannot reduce their intentions to practice modern FP methods.
The results of the interactive effect of perceived barriers and contraceptive knowledge show that perceived barriers do not moderate the relationship between contraceptive knowledge and the adoption of modern FP practices, which contradicts a proposed hypothesis. This result is in accordance with the common-sense model [91]. The model explains that human behavior is determined by the process of learning. Before adopting any health behavior, an individual assesses its pros and cons through cognition. For example, if individuals have to get treatment for a disease they will think about its cost, prognosis, and benefits, and then make decisions about action. Comprehensive knowledge about threats associated with health behavior reduces fear and leads to the adoption of that behavior [92]. As the participants of this study reported a higher level of contraceptive knowledge, it can thus be concluded, based on the previous literature, that high contraceptive knowledge among women helps them to make informed choices, overcome fears, and motivate them towards adopting modern FP practices.
The results of the interactive effect between perceived barriers and spousal communication were not significant, which shows that perceived barriers were not moderating the relationship between spousal communication and the adoption of modern FP practices. Since the literature shows that spousal communication about using contraceptives and involving the male partner in decision making about fertility preferences directly influences efforts for limiting fertility, they help women in overcoming perceived barriers as the fear of opposition is being shared by both partners [93]. Evidence from previous studies [94,95] also reveals that dynamics of spousal communication have a positive effect on contraceptive behavior; thus, these result are in line with the findings of the current study. Spousal discussion boosts modern FP use and consequently reduces fertility and maternal mortality rate.

5.1. Practical Implications

The findings provide several implications for practice. It is recommended that policymakers should incorporate modern contraceptive FP program models as a strategy to enhance the contraceptive prevalence rate. Special consideration should be given to spousal communication, and couples should be encouraged to discuss the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices. Awareness campaigns should be launched that highlight the benefits of spousal discussion about ideal family size, societal pressures, complications related to closely spaced deliveries, unsafe abortion, the risks of maternal and child mortality, malnutrition among children, and modern FP practices. Policymakers should also formulate policies for male involvement in modern FP programs across the country by introducing improved male-oriented methods and incorporating male FP workers to reduce communication barriers and shyness (as shown by a program that has been launched by FALAH in Pakistan and reported positive outcomes) [57]. FP program stakeholders should focus on promoting contraceptive knowledge among women to promote the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices.
Understanding different factors in the adoption of modern FP practices is necessary in formulating more suitable policies for public health [8,96]. As the use of FP is high in educated and urbanized people, there is a need to focus on slums and rural areas with a low literacy rate as well as how their perceptions about ideal family size change [88]. As the findings indicated that improving contraceptive knowledge leads towards FP practices, this study provides baseline information to policymakers towards the value of gaining comprehensive knowledge to increase the use of FP [97]. This study also draws public attention towards spousal discussion because it can increase the usage of modern methods for FP among couples, leading to a reduction in unwanted pregnancies and associated risks. In addition, our findings highlight the need for proper fund allocation as well as the provision of training and refresher courses for female health workers [98]. Furthermore, counselling intervention should be introduced to involve in-laws in programs to reduce barriers toward the adoption of modern methods for FP practices [99,100]. This study attempts to assist the Pakistani government in reaching its national development goals of enhancing maternal and reproductive health through the increased use of modern contraceptives.

5.2. Limitations and Directions for Future Research

This paper has several limitations. First, the findings of current study were predisposing to recall bias as data were self-reported by respondents rather than dyads, etc. Future studies should ensure that the way questions are worded does not influence the answers of participants due to the possible risk of recall bias. Second, as the majority of the respondents belonged to the Rawalpindi and Neelum Valley regions, the findings may not be generalizable due to the smaller sample size and convenience sampling technique using a specific targeted group, which lack external validity. Future studies should run the analysis using a larger dataset. Third, the current study is limited and not able to measure several other important variables (i.e., the desire for an additional child, myths/misconceptions, fear of side effects, and partner/friend discouragement) which also affect the use of contraceptives. Future researchers are required to conduct studies on the approval of modern FP practices by couples and their association with contraceptive knowledge and barriers in acquiring contraceptive knowledge. Fourth, since the current study employed a statistical method due to the authors’ limitations in using advanced statistical tools, future studies may use PLS-SEM as an advanced statistical tool, which seems much more appropriate, especially when analyzing possible moderation. Finally, for formulating comprehensive strategies about couple counselling to overcome the knowledge and practice gap and to dispel misconceptions about contraceptives, researchers should conduct qualitative studies on spousal communication and contraceptive knowledge.

6. Conclusions

To conclude, the empirical analysis supported three hypotheses proposed in this study. The results indicated that CSE, contraceptive knowledge, and spousal communication positively impact the adoption of modern contraceptive methods for FP practices. In particular, the higher CSE in women motivates them to adopt modern contraceptive methods for FP practices. It also encourages women to overcome all the barriers, which limit their access to FP services. CSE helps women to understand the importance of FP practices that are important in maintaining the gap between child births. It supports women in decision making about fertility preferences, which helps them to recover their health from previous pregnancies and provide better care to their children.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.N.M.; methodology, J.N.M.; software, J.N.M.; validation, A.M.S. and K.L.; formal analysis, J.N.M.; investigation, J.N.M.; resources, A.M.S.; data curation, J.N.M. and A.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.N.M. and A.M.S.; writing—review and editing, A.M.S.; visualization, K.L.; supervision, K.L.; project administration, K.L.; funding acquisition, K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program (IITP-2021-2017-0-01630), and the work (No. 2020-0-01907, Development of Smart Signage Technology for Automatic Classification of Untact Examination and Patient Status Based on AI) was supervised by the IITP (Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Management Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan (FMS/RSL/ERC/107 on 11 August 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Constructs along with their corresponding items.
Table A1. Constructs along with their corresponding items.
Construct and ItemsSource
Contraceptive Self-Efficacy (CSE)[80]
CSE1: I can use a modern contraceptive method to prevent pregnancy.
CSE2: I can consistently use (method of interest).
CSE3: I feel confident that I can obtain an effective birth spacing method.
CSE4: I can talk to my partner about using modern contraceptive to prevent pregnancy.
CSE5: I feel comfortable talking with a health care provider about birth space method.
CSE6: I can convince my partner to use the modern FP practices.
CSE7: I can use modern FP practices even if my partner disagrees.
Contraceptive Knowledge (CK)[81]
CK1: I use birth control pills that are effective even if I misses taking them for two or three days in a row.
CK2: I believe female sterilization is one way to avoid pregnancy.
CK3: I am aware that health education is important for women who want to use contraception.
CK4: I believe the contraceptive pills do not guarantee 100% protection.
CK5: If I feel the side effects of using one kind of contraceptive pill, I will be switching to another type that might help me.
CK6: I believe using both a condom and the pill is a very effective contraceptive.
CK7: I believe the pill increases a woman’s risk of ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer.
Spousal Communication (SC)[82]
SC1: I and my spouse discuss things that happened during the day.
SC2: I and my spouse often discuss worries or feelings.
SC3: I and my spouse often discuss what to spend household money on.
SC4: I and my spouse discuss when to have children.
SC5: I and my spouse discuss whether to use modern FP practices or not.
Family Planning (FP) practices[81]
FP1: I often visit a health center for FP services.
FP2: I often use one of the contraceptives (A) to prevent unplanned pregnancy.
FP3: I had any unplanned pregnancy due to lack of contraceptive (A) use.
FP4: I use contraceptives (A) every time when I do not intend to get pregnant.
FP5: I use different types of contraceptives (A).
FP6: My current method of contraceptives (A) changes from time to time.
FP7: I often practice traditional contraceptive methods including herbal and breast feeding if I do not use any contraceptives (A).
Perceived Barriers (PB)[83]
PB1: Contraceptive (A) use is not suitable for me.
PB2: Contraceptive use (A) may be painful for me.
PB3: Contraceptive use (A) is time-consuming for me.
PB4: Contraceptive use (A) disturbs my sex life.
PB5: Contraceptive measures (A) are too expensive for me.
PB6: I am concerned about having a bad reaction by using contraceptive measures (A).
PB7: Prolonged use of contraceptive measures (A) affects me negatively.
PB8: Contraceptive measures (A) affect my husband negatively.
PB9: Contraceptive measures (A) affect attitudes of people towards me negatively.
PB10: I find it embarrassing to use contraceptive measures (A).
PB11: Contraceptive use (A) does not fit in with our culture.
PB12: I believe the contraceptive use (A) is not hygienic.
PB13: My husband does not want contraceptive use (A).
PB14: I cannot talk to a male health professional about contraceptive use (A).
Contraceptive Methods (A): Pill, IUCD, condom, periodic abstinence, withdrawal, female sterilization, male sterilization, implants.

References

  1. Statista. Pakistan: Total Population from 2016 to 2026. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/383245/total-population-of-pakistan/ (accessed on 1 October 2021).
  2. Population Council. Landscape Analysis of Family Planning Situation in Pakistan: Brief Summary of Findings: September, 2016; Population Council: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Government of Pakistan. Family Planning 2020 Commitment; Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination: Islamabad, Pakistan, 2017; p. FP2020.
  4. Azmat, S.K.; Ali, M.; Ishaque, M.; Mustafa, G.; Hameed, W.; Khan, O.F.; Abbas, G.; Temmerman, M.; Munroe, E. Assessing predictors of contraceptive use and demand for family planning services in underserved areas of Punjab province in Pakistan: Results of a cross-sectional baseline survey. Reprod. Health 2015, 12, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. International Institute for Population Sciences. National family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–2006: India; International Institute for Population Sciences: Mumbai, India, 2007; Volume 1.
  6. National Institute of Population Studies. The DHS Program; ICF: Rockville, MD, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cleland, J.; Bernstein, S.; Ezeh, A.; Faundes, A.; Glasier, A.; Innis, J. Family planning: The unfinished agenda. Lancet 2006, 368, 1810–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ataullahjan, A.; Mumtaz, Z.; Vallianatos, H. Family planning in Pakistan: A site of resistance. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019, 230, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sathar, Z.A. Family planning: A missing priority in Pakistan’s health sector? Lancet 2013, 381, 2140–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kanwal Aslam, S.; Zaheer, S.; Qureshi, M.S.; Aslam, S.N.; Shafique, K. Socio-Economic Disparities in Use of Family Planning Methods among Pakistani Women: Findings from Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ataullahjan, A.; Mumtaz, Z.; Vallianatos, H. Family planning, Islam and sin: Understandings of moral actions in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019, 230, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Singh, S.; Darroch, J.E.; Ashford, L.S. Adding It Up: The Costs and Benefits of Investing in Sexual and reproductive Health 2014; Alan Guttmacher Institute: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. Becker, S. Couples and Reproductive Health: A Review of Couple Studies. Stud. Fam. Plan. 1996, 27, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sharan, M.; Valente, T.W. Spousal communication and family planning adoption: Effects of a radio drama serial in Nepal. Int. Fam. Plan. Perspect. 2002, 28, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Blanc, A.K. The Effect of Power in Sexual Relationships on Sexual and Reproductive Health: An Examination of the Evidence. Stud. Fam. Plan. 2001, 32, 189–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. NIPS. Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18; NIPS: Islamabad, Pakistan; ICF: Rockville, MD, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ali, M.; Azmat, S.K.; Hamza, H.B. Assessment of modern contraceptives continuation, switching and discontinuation among clients in Pakistan: Study protocol of 24-months post family planning voucher intervention follow up. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2018, 18, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Sufian, A.J. Determinants of contraceptive knowledge and family planning services in Bangladesh. Genus 1992, 48, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Mustafa, G.; Azmat, S.K.; Hameed, W.; Ali, S.; Ishaque, M.; Hussain, W.; Ahmed, A.; Munroe, E. Family Planning Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Married Men and Women in Rural Areas of Pakistan: Findings from a Qualitative Need Assessment Study. Int. J. Reprod. Med. 2015, 2015, 190520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Tomaszewski, D.; Aronson, B.D.; Kading, M.; Morisky, D. Relationship between self-efficacy and patient knowledge on adherence to oral contraceptives using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). Reprod. Health 2017, 14, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Saleem, S.; Bobak, M. Women’s autonomy, education and contraception use in Pakistan: A national study. Reprod. Health 2005, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shartzer, A.; Courtot, B.; McMorrow, S.; Benatar, S.; Kenney, G.M. Knowledge Gaps and Misinformation about Birth Control Methods Persist in 2016; Health Policy Center: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ip, W.-Y.; Sin, L.L.; Chan, D.S. Contraceptive self-efficacy and contraceptive knowledge of Hong Kong Chinese women with unplanned pregnancy. J. Clin. Nurs. 2009, 18, 2416–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 1977, 84, 191–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Peyman, N.; Hidarnia, A.; Ghofranipour, F.; Kazemnezhad, A.; Oakley, D.; Khodaee, G.; Aminshokravi, F. Self-efficacy: Does it predict the effectiveness of contraceptive use in Iranian women? East. Mediterr. Health J. 2009, 15, 1254–1262. [Google Scholar]
  26. Singh, A.; Singh, K.K.; Verma, P. Knowledge, attitude and practice GAP in family planning usage: An analysis of selected cities of Uttar Pradesh. Contracept. Reprod. Med. 2016, 1, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Murphy, E. Diffusion of Innovations: Family Planning in Developing Countries. J. Health Commun. 2004, 9, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mbizvo, M.T.; Phillips, S.J. Family planning: Choices and challenges for developing countries. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014, 28, 931–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sheraz, A.; Williams, R. Islam and Family Planning: Perceptions and Practices (A Pilot Study in Sialkot and Chakwal Districts); National Institute of Population Studies: Islamabad, Pakistan, 2010.
  30. Miller, A.D. Positive Deviance, Contraceptive Self-Efficacy and Social Desirability in Sexually Active Adolescent Females: A Mixed Methods Approach; University of Louisville: Louisville, KY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hamidi, O.P.; Deimling, T.; Lehman, E.; Weisman, C.; Chuang, C. High Self-Efficacy Is Associated with Prescription Contraceptive Use. Women Health Issues 2018, 28, 509–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Levinson, R.A.; Wan, C.K.; Beamer, L.J. The Contraceptive Self-Efficacy Scale: Analysis in Four Samples. J. Youth Adolesc. 1998, 27, 773–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Longmore, M.A.; Manning, W.D.; Giordano, P.C.; Rudolph, J.L. Contraceptive self-efficacy: Does it influence adolescents’ contraceptive use? J. Health Soc. Behav. 2003, 44, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Aitken, K.L. Do Aspects of Personality Determine Sexually Responsible Behaviour and Contraceptive Self-Efficacy among Adolescent Females? University of Canterbury: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  35. Levinson, R.A. Contraceptive self-efficacy: A perspective on teenage girls’ contraceptive behavior. J. Sex Res. 1986, 22, 347–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nsubuga, H.; Sekandi, J.N.; Sempeera, H.; Makumbi, F.E. Contraceptive use, knowledge, attitude, perceptions and sexual behavior among female University students in Uganda: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Women Health 2016, 16, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ikechebelu, J.I.; Joe-Ikechebelu, N.N.; Obiajulu, F.N. Knowledge, attitude and practice of family planning among Igbo women of south-eastern Nigeria. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2005, 25, 792–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cavallaro, F.L.; Benova, L.; Owolabi, O.O.; Ali, M. A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: What works and what doesn’t? BMJ Sex. Reprod. Health 2020, 46, 254–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Ajong, A.B.; Njotang, P.N.; Kenfack, B.; Yakum, M.N.; Mbu, E.R. Knowledge of women in family planning and future desire to use contraception: A cross sectional survey in Urban Cameroon. BMC Res. Notes 2016, 9, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Muhoza, D.N.; Rutayisire, P.C.; Umubyeyi, A. Measuring the success of family planning initiatives in Rwanda: A multivariate decomposition analysis. J. Popul. Res. 2016, 33, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Somba, M.J.; Mbonile, M.; Obure, J.; Mahande, M.J. Sexual behaviour, contraceptive knowledge and use among female undergraduates’ students of Muhimbili and Dar es Salaam Universities, Tanzania: A cross-sectional study. BMC Women Health 2014, 14, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Jabeen, S.; Rathor, A.; Riaz, M.; Zakar, R.; Fischer, F. Demand- and supply-side factors associated with the use of contraceptive methods in Pakistan: A comparative study of demographic and health surveys, 1990–2018. BMC Women Health 2020, 20, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Simmons, R.G.; Jennings, V. Fertility awareness-based methods of family planning. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2020, 66, 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rasmussen, P.V.; Magyari, M.; Moberg, J.Y.; Bøgelund, M.; Jensen, U.F.A.; Madsen, K.G. Patient awareness about family planning represents a major knowledge gap in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2018, 24, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Sila, J.; Larsen, A.M.; Kinuthia, J.; Owiti, G.; Abuna, F.; Kohler, P.K.; John-Stewart, G.; Pintye, J. High Awareness, Yet Low Uptake, of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Within Family Planning Clinics in Kenya. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2020, 34, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jackson, A.V.; Karasek, D.; Dehlendorf, C.; Foster, D.G. Racial and ethnic differences in women’s preferences for features of contraceptive methods. Contraception 2016, 93, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Polis, C.B.; Curtis, K.M.; Hannaford, P.C.; Phillips, S.J.; Chipato, T.; Kiarie, J.N.; Westreich, D.J.; Steyn, P.S. An updated systematic review of epidemiological evidence on hormonal contraceptive methods and HIV acquisition in women. AIDS 2016, 30, 2665–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kavanaugh, M.L.; Jerman, J. Contraceptive method use in the United States: Trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014. Contraception 2018, 97, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Pazol, K.; Zapata, L.B.; Tregear, S.J.; Mautone-Smith, N.; Gavin, L.E. Impact of Contraceptive Education on Contraceptive Knowledge and Decision Making: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2015, 49, S46–S56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Eliason, S.; Baiden, F.; Quansah-Asare, G.; Graham-Hayfron, Y.; Bonsu, D.; Phillips, J.; Awusabo-Asare, K. Factors influencing the intention of women in rural Ghana to adopt postpartum family planning. Reprod. Health 2013, 10, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Bibi, S.; Memon, A.; Memon, Z.; Bibi, M. Contraceptive knowledge and practices in two districts of Sindh, Pakistan: A hospital based study. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2008, 15, 21–30. [Google Scholar]
  52. Jaffery, H.O.; Tufail, S.; Aslam, P.; Qamar, S.; Mushtaq, Q.; Qanwal, R. Knowledge, attitude and practice of family planning among pakistani women attending a tertiary care hospital. Pak. Armed Forces Med. J. 2019, 69, 329–333. [Google Scholar]
  53. Link, C.F. Spousal Communication and Contraceptive Use in Rural Nepal: An Event History Analysis. Stud. Fam. Plan. 2011, 42, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Balaiah, D.; Naik, D.; Ghule, M.; Tapase, P. Determinants of spacing contraceptive use among couples in Mumbai: A male perspective. J. Biosoc. Sci. 2005, 37, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kaggwa, E.B.; Diop, N.; Storey, J.D. The role of individual and community normative factors: A multilevel analysis of contraceptive use among women in union in Mali. Int. Fam. Plan. Perspect. 2008, 34, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Klomegah, R. Spousal Communication, Power, and Contraceptive Use in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Marriage Fam. Rev. 2006, 40, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ashfaq, S.; Sadiq, M. Engaging the Missing Link: Evidence from FALAH for Involving Men in Family Planning in Pakistan—Case Study; Population Council: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  58. Khan, M.S.; Hashmani, F.N.; Ahmed, O.; Khan, M.; Ahmed, S.; Syed, S.; Qazi, F. Quantitatively evaluating the effect of social barriers: A case-control study of family members’ opposition and women’s intention to use contraception in Pakistan. Emerg. Themes Epidemiol. 2015, 12, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Speizer, I.S. Are husbands a barrier to women’s family planning use? The case of Morocco. Soc. Biol. 1999, 46, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Glasgow, R.E. Perceived Barriers to Self-Management and Preventive Behaviors. Available online: https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/research/constructs/barriers.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2021).
  61. Kiani, M.F.K. Motivation and Involvement of Men in Family Planning in Pakistan. Pak. Dev. Rev. 2003, 42, 197–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Shaikh, B.T.; Azmat, S.K.; Mazhar, A. Family planning and contraception in Islamic countries: A critical review of the literature. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2013, 63, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
  63. Campbell, M.; Sahin-Hodoglugil, N.N.; Potts, M. Barriers to Fertility Regulation: A Review of the Literature. Stud. Fam. Plan. 2006, 37, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Phillips, J.F.; Hossain, M.B.; Arends-Kuenning, M. The Long-term Demographic Role of Community-based Family Planning in Rural Bangladesh. Stud. Fam. Plan. 1996, 27, 204–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Casterline, J.B.; Sathar, Z.A.; ul Haque, M. Obstacles to Contraceptive Use in Pakistan: A Study in Punjab. Stud. Fam. Plan. 2001, 32, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tabassum, A.; Manj, Y.N.; Gunjial, T.R.; Nazir, S. Perceptions of rural women about contraceptive usage in district Khushab, Punjab. JPMA 2016, 66, 1577–1581. [Google Scholar]
  67. Camphuijsen, M.; Wallaart, K. Overcoming Barriers to Family Planning in Pakistan: Lessons from Stories of Change and a Literature Review; Oxfam Novib: Islamabad, Pakistan, 2016; p. 19. [Google Scholar]
  68. Bergmann, J.N.; Stockman, J.K. How does intimate partner violence affect condom and oral contraceptive Use in the United States?: A systematic review of the literature. Contraception 2015, 91, 438–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Zafar, M.I.; Ullah, M.H.; Abbasi, S. Fertility Regulating Behaviour: A Study of Rural Punjab-Pakistan. J. Appl. Sci. 2003, 3, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sahin, H.A.; Sahin, H.G. Reasons for not using family planning methods in Eastern Turkey. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2003, 8, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Anwar, S.; Aslam, Z.; Qureshi, S.; Riaz, Q. Unmet Needs for Family Planning. J. Rawalpindi Med Coll. Stud. Suppl. 2015, 19, 55–58. [Google Scholar]
  72. Regmi, P.R.; van Teijlingen, E.; Simkhada, P.; Acharya, D.R. Barriers to Sexual Health Services for Young People in Nepal. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2010, 28, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Sinai, I.; Omoluabi, E.; Jimoh, A.; Jurczynska, K. Unmet need for family planning and barriers to contraceptive use in Kaduna, Nigeria: Culture, myths and perceptions. Cult. Health Sex. 2020, 22, 1253–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Stephenson, R.; Hennink, M. Barriers to family planning service use among the urban poor in Pakistan. Asia-Pac. Popul. J. 2004, 19, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Mosha, I.; Ruben, R.; Kakoko, D. Family planning decisions, perceptions and gender dynamics among couples in Mwanza, Tanzania: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Chipeta, E.K.; Chimwaza, W.; Kalilani-Phiri, L. Contraceptive knowledge, beliefs and attitudes in rural Malawi: Misinformation, misbeliefs and misperceptions. Malawi Med. J. 2010, 22, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Dansereau, E.; Schaefer, A.; Hernández, B.; Nelson, J.; Palmisano, E.; Ríos-Zertuche, D.; Woldeab, A.; Zúñiga, M.P.; Iriarte, E.M.; Mokdad, A.H.; et al. Perceptions of and barriers to family planning services in the poorest regions of Chiapas, Mexico: A qualitative study of men, women, and adolescents. Reprod. Health 2017, 14, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Jejeebhoy, S.J.; Sathar, Z.A. Women’s Autonomy in India and Pakistan: The Influence of Religion and Region. Popul. Dev. Rev. 2001, 27, 687–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vishnu Prasad, R.; Venkatachalam, J.; Singh, Z. Unmet Needs of Family Planning among Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Rural Area of Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, South India. J. Obstet. Gynecol. India 2016, 66, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Prata, N.; Bell, S.; Fraser, A.; Carvalho, A.; Neves, I. Partner support for family planning and modern contraceptive use in Luanda, Angola. Afr. J. Reprod. Health 2017, 21, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Lincoln, J.; Mohammadnezhad, M.; Khan, S. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Family Planning Among Women of Reproductive Age in Suva, Fiji in 2017. J. Women Health Care 2018, 7, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wegs, C.; Creanga, A.A.; Galavotti, C.; Wamalwa, E. Community dialogue to shift social norms and enable family planning: An evaluation of the family planning results initiative in Kenya. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sen, S.; Cetinkaya, A.; Cavuslar, A. Perceptıon scale of barrıers to contraceptıve use: A methodologıcal study. Fertil. Res. Pract. 2017, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hair, J.; Black, W.; Babin, B.; Anderson, R. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson: New York, NY, USA, 2010; p. 816. [Google Scholar]
  87. Najafi-Sharjabad, F.; Rahman, H.A.; Hanafiah, M.; Yahya, S.Z.S. Spousal communication on family planning and perceived social support for contraceptive practices in a sample of Malaysian women. Iran. J. Nurs. Midwifery Res. 2014, 19, S19–S27. [Google Scholar]
  88. Orji, E.O.; Ojofeitimi, E.O.; Olanrewaju, B.A. The role of men in family planning decision-making in rural and urban Nigeria. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2007, 12, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 1977; p. 578. [Google Scholar]
  90. Ajzen, I. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior; Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1985; pp. 11–39. [Google Scholar]
  91. Leventhal, H.; Diefenbach, M.; Leventhal, E.A. Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cogn. Ther. Res. 1992, 16, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Scrimshaw, S.; Bandura, A.; Fishbein, M. Speaking of Health: Assessing Health Communication Strategies for Diverse Populations; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2002; p. 376. [Google Scholar]
  93. Hartmann, M.; Gilles, K.; Shattuck, D.; Kerner, B.; Guest, G. Changes in Couples’ Communication as a Result of a Male-Involvement Family Planning Intervention. J. Health Commun. 2012, 17, 802–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hajason, J.Z.; Piña, K.; Raveloharimisy, J.L. The Influence of Family Dynamics on Contraceptive Use in Madagascar and the Ensuing Impact on Family Well-Being; MEASURE Evaluation PRH: Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2013; 17p. [Google Scholar]
  95. Rimal, R.N.; Sripad, P.; Speizer, I.S.; Calhoun, L.M. Interpersonal communication as an agent of normative influence: A mixed method study among the urban poor in India. Reprod. Health 2015, 12, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Azmat, S.K.; Mustafa, G.; Hameed, W.; Ali, M.; Ahmed, A.; Bilgrami, M. Barriers and perceptions regarding different contraceptives and family planning practices amongst men and women of reproductive age in rural Pakistan: A qualitative study. Pak. J. Public Health 2012, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  97. Asif, M.F.; Pervaiz, Z. Socio-demographic determinants of unmet need for family planning among married women in Pakistan. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Rabbani, F.; Shipton, L.; Aftab, W.; Sangrasi, K.; Perveen, S.; Zahidie, A. Inspiring health worker motivation with supportive supervision: A survey of lady health supervisor motivating factors in rural Pakistan. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2016, 16, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Yousafzai, A.K.; Rasheed, M.A.; Rizvi, A.; Armstrong, R.; Bhutta, Z.A. Effect of integrated responsive stimulation and nutrition interventions in the Lady Health Worker programme in Pakistan on child development, growth, and health outcomes: A cluster-randomised factorial effectiveness trial. Lancet 2014, 384, 1282–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Aransiola, J.O.; Akinyemi, A.I.; Fatusi, A.O. Women’s perceptions and reflections of male partners and couple dynamics in family planning adoption in selected urban slums in Nigeria: A qualitative exploration. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijerph 18 11892 g001 550
Figure 1. Research model.
Figure 1. Research model.
Ijerph 18 11892 g001
Ijerph 18 11892 g002 550
Figure 2. Interactive effect of contraceptive self-efficacy and perceived barriers on FP practices. CSE = contraceptive self-efficacy; PB = perceived barriers.
Figure 2. Interactive effect of contraceptive self-efficacy and perceived barriers on FP practices. CSE = contraceptive self-efficacy; PB = perceived barriers.
Ijerph 18 11892 g002
Table
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents.
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents.
CharacteristicsN (250)n (%)
Women’s Education
Illiterate3313.2%
Literate21786.8%
Employment Status (Wife)
Employed women9136.4%
Unemployed women15963.6%
Age of Women (Years)
≤243714.6%
>24 to 3519578.3%
>35187.1%
Age of Women at Time of Marriage
>256726.9%
>18 to 2518072%
≤1831.1%
Area Demographics
Urban areas7530%
Rural areas17570%
Religion
Muslim23995.6%
Non-Muslim114.4%
Husbands’ Education
Illiterate23895.2%
Literate124.8%
Employment Status (Husband)
Employed husband24397.2%
Unemployed husband72.8%
Number of Living Children
0–1 child6827%
2–3 children12048%
4 or more children6225%
Health Status
Healthy23092%
Unhealthy208%
Household Head
Husband18172.4%
Wife6927.6%
Decision Making Regarding Pregnancy
Husband decides15662.3%
Mother-in-law decides41.6%
Respondent (woman) decides218.5%
Both (husband and wife) decide6927.6%
Spousal Communication Regarding Family Planning and Birth Spacing
No8835.2%
Yes16264.8%
Table
Table 2. One-way ANOVA.
Table 2. One-way ANOVA.
Modern Family Planning Practices
Source of VariationF-Statisticp-Value
Qualification0.8800.510
Profession3.3710.068
Area of residence19.0890.000
Region19.0890.000
Current age2.6820.047
Age at time of marriage2.8810.091
Religion1.4950.226
Husband’s qualification1.4960.180
Husband’s profession0.8970.354
No. of children7.9840.000
Health status1.2670.261
Head of household0.3990.754
Table
Table 3. Means, standard deviations, correlations, and reliabilities.
Table 3. Means, standard deviations, correlations, and reliabilities.
Variables1234567891011121314151617
1. CSE(0.83)
2. CK0.413 **(0.80)
3. SC0.129 *0.321 **(0.78)
4. FP0.481 **0.344 **0.223 **(0.97)
5. PB0.006 ns0.236 **0.106 ns0.092 ns(0.75)
6. Qual.0.041 ns0.012 ns0.023 ns0.025 ns0.037 ns1.00
7. Prof.0.231 ns0.125 ns0.145 ns0.236 ns0.061 ns0.652 ns1.00
8. AoR0.062 **0.054 *0.031 *0.027 **0.014 **0.031 *0.045 **1.00
9. Reg.0.265 **0.222 **0.256 *0.362 **0.451 *0.325 **0.322 *0.316 **1.00
10. CA0.126 *0.215 *0.279 *0.043 **0.201 *0.006 *0.325 *0.122 **0.421 **1.00
11. ATM0.011 ns0.022 ns0.043 ns0.054 ns0.134 ns0.147 ns0.242 ns0.327 ns0.362 ns0.370 ns1.00
12. Relig.0.12 ns0.42 ns0.20 ns0.07 ns0.33 ns0.013 ns0.52 ns0.103 ns0.321 ns0.254 ns0.115 ns1.00
13. HQ0.33 ns0.11 ns0.256 ns0.125 ns0.269 ns0.112 ns0.325 ns0.225 ns0.124 ns0.254 ns0.365 ns0.105 ns1.00
14. HP0.269 ns0.171 ns0.002 ns0.185 ns0.125 ns0.145 ns0.062 ns0.069 ns0.065 ns0.025 ns0.032 ns0.277 ns0.253 ns1.00
15. NC0.107 **0.116 *0.223 *0.178 *0.121 *0.452 **0.128 *0.248 **0.179 **0.125 *0.326 *0.028 **0.369 **0.459 **1.00
16. HS0.025 ns0.036 ns0.269 *0.002 ns0.003 ns0.003 ns0.045 ns0.010 ns0.019 ns0.018 ns0.017 ns0.369 ns0.269 ns0.369 ns0.269 ns1.00
17. HH0.012 ns0.009 ns0.23 ns0.051 ns0.023 ns0.021 ns0.026 ns0.027 ns0.025 ns0.034 ns0.317 ns0.212 ns0.415 ns0.025 ns0.145 ns0.259 ns1.00
Mean3.163.593.313.142.152.871.981.222.582.672.350.5672.502.893.000.610.67
S.D0.690.590.990.870.820.780.610.690.230.250.490.060.710.550.960.030.11
Notes: n = 250; alpha reliabilities are given in parentheses. p < 0.05. S.D = standard deviation, CSE = contraceptive self-efficacy, CK = contraceptive knowledge, SC = spousal communication, PB = perceived barriers, Qual = qualification, Prof. = profession, AoR = area of residence, Reg. = region, CA = current age, ATM = age at time of marriage, Relig. = religion, HQ = husband’s qualification, HP = husband’s profession, NC = No. of children, HS = health status, and HH = head of household. **, correlation is significant at the 0.01 level; *, correlation is significant at the 0.05 level. ns = correlation is not significant.
Table
Table 4. Hierarchical moderated regression analysis.
Table 4. Hierarchical moderated regression analysis.
Modern Family Planning Practices
PredictorsΒR2∆R2
Step 1
Control variables 0.082
Qualification0.065 ns
Profession0.01 ns
Area of residence0.126 **
Region0.256 *
Current age0.325 **
Age at time of marriage0.125 ns
Religion0.144 ns
Husband’s qualification0.136 ns
Husband’s profession0.225 ns
No. of children0.258 *
Health status0.452 ns
Head of household0.201ns
Step 2
Contraceptive self-efficacy0.551 ***0.4480.366 ***
Contraceptive knowledge0.226 *
Spousal communication0.184 **
Perceived barriers0.049ns
Step 3
CSE × PB0.168 **0.4420.016 ns
CK × PB−0.020 ns
SC × PB0.037 ns
Notes: ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; and *, p < 0.05. CSE = contraceptive self-efficacy, CK = contraceptive knowledge, SC = spousal communication, and PB = perceived barriers. ns = not significant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shah, A.M.; Lee, K.; Nisa Mir, J. Exploring Readiness for Birth Control in Improving Women Health Status: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Modern Contraceptives Methods for Family Planning Practices. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11892. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211892

AMA Style

Shah AM, Lee K, Nisa Mir J. Exploring Readiness for Birth Control in Improving Women Health Status: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Modern Contraceptives Methods for Family Planning Practices. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(22):11892. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211892

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shah, Adnan Muhammad, KangYoon Lee, and Javaria Nisa Mir. 2021. "Exploring Readiness for Birth Control in Improving Women Health Status: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Modern Contraceptives Methods for Family Planning Practices" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 22: 11892. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211892

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop