Next Article in Journal
A Retrospective Cohort Study of Lung Cancer Incidences and Epidemiological Analysis in Saudi Arabian Population from 2006–2016
Next Article in Special Issue
Variation of the Occurrence of Physical Restraint Use in the Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Journal
Conducting In-Depth Interviews via Mobile Phone with Persons with Common Mental Disorders and Multimorbidity: The Challenges and Advantages as Experienced by Participants and Researchers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nurses’ Views on the Use of Physical Restraints in Intensive Care: A Qualitative Study
Article

Physical Restraint Use in Intensive Care Units: Exploring the Decision-Making Process and New Proposals. A Multimethod Study

1
Transplant National Organization, Health Ministry, 28029 Madrid, Spain
2
Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain
3
Carlos III Health Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Elisa Ambrosi and Federica Canzan
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(22), 11826; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211826
Received: 30 September 2021 / Revised: 4 November 2021 / Accepted: 8 November 2021 / Published: 11 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Use of Physical Restraints in Clinical Practice)
Aim: The general aim of this study was to explore the decision-making process followed by Intensive Care Unit (ICU) health professionals with respect to physical restraint (PR) administration and management, along with the factors that influence it. Method: A qual-quant multimethod design was sequenced in two stages: an initial stage following a qualitative methodology; and second, quantitative with a predominant descriptive approach. The multicenter study was undertaken at 17 ICUs belonging to 11 public hospitals in the Madrid region (Spain) across the period 2015 through 2019. The qualitative stage was performed from an interpretative phenomenological perspective. A total of eight discussion groups (DG) were held, with the participation of 23 nurses, 12 patient care nursing assistants, and seven physicians. Intentional purposive sampling was carried out. DG were tape-recorded and transcribed. A thematic analysis of the latent content was performed. In the quantitative stage, we maintained a 96-h observation period at each ICU. Variables pertaining to general descriptive elements of each ICU, institutional pain-agitation/sedation-delirium (PAD) monitoring policies and elements linked to quality of PR use were recorded. A descriptive analysis was performed, and the relationship between the variables was analyzed. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Findings: A total of 1070 patients were observed, amounting to a median prevalence of PR use of 19.11% (min: 0%–max: 44.44%). The differences observed between ICUs could be explained by a difference in restraint conceptualization. The various actors involved jointly build up a health care culture and a conceptualization of the terms “safety-risk”, which determine decision-making about the use of restraints at each ICU. These shared meanings are the germ of beliefs, values, and rituals which, in this case, determine the greater or lesser use of restraints. There were different profiles of PR use among the units studied: preventive restraints versus “Zero” restraints. The differences corresponded to aspects such as: systematic use of tools for assessment of PAD; interpretation of patient behavior; the decision-making process, the significance attributed to patient safety and restraints; and the feelings generated by PR use. The restraint–free model requires an approach to safety from a holistic perspective, with the involvement of all team members and the family. View Full-Text
Keywords: restraint; physical; critical care; intensive care units; restraint; physical/standards; PAD assessment; multicenter study; multimethod research; mixed-method research restraint; physical; critical care; intensive care units; restraint; physical/standards; PAD assessment; multicenter study; multimethod research; mixed-method research
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Acevedo-Nuevo, M.; González-Gil, M.T.; Martin-Arribas, M.C. Physical Restraint Use in Intensive Care Units: Exploring the Decision-Making Process and New Proposals. A Multimethod Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211826

AMA Style

Acevedo-Nuevo M, González-Gil MT, Martin-Arribas MC. Physical Restraint Use in Intensive Care Units: Exploring the Decision-Making Process and New Proposals. A Multimethod Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(22):11826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Acevedo-Nuevo, María, María T. González-Gil, and María C. Martin-Arribas. 2021. "Physical Restraint Use in Intensive Care Units: Exploring the Decision-Making Process and New Proposals. A Multimethod Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 22: 11826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211826

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop