The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Gender between Job Satisfaction and Task Performance
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Job Satisfaction as a Dimension of Well-Being
1.2. The Link of Job Satisfaction with Task Performance
1.3. The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior
1.4. The Role of Gender
1.5. The Relation with Other Characteristics
1.6. Research Questions and Hypotheses
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Design and Procedure
2.2. Participants
2.3. Measures
Variable | Definition | Measure (N Items) | Subscales (N Items) |
---|---|---|---|
JS | Extent to which employees feel their work is fulfilling and increases their sense of self-worth [3] | Workplace Well-being Questionnaire (31) [2] | Work satisfaction (10), Respect for the employee (7), Employer care (7), Intrusion of work into private life (7) |
OCB | A set of discretionary employee extra-role behaviors, which are not formally required in their job [18] | Organizational Citizenship Behavior scale (15) [63] | Altruism (6), Civic virtue (4), Conscientiousness (5) 1 |
TP | Proficiency with which employees carry out the core tasks of their job [8] | Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (18) [65] | Task performance (5), Contextual performance (8), Counterproductive work behavior (5) |
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Items of the Survey Questionnaires
References
- Faragher, E.B.; Cass, M.; Cooper, C.L. The relationship between job satisfaction and health: A meta-analysis. Occup. Environ. Med. 2005, 62, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyett, M.P.; Parker, G.B. Further examination of the properties of the workplace well-being questionnaire (WWQ). Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 124, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, G.B.; Hyett, M.P. Measurement of well-being in the workplace: The development of the work well-being questionnaire. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2011, 199, 394–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 141–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Addabbo, T.; Solinas, G. Non-standard employment and quality of work: Towards new forms of measurement. In Non-Standard Employment and Quality of Work: The Case of Italy; Addabbo, T., Solinas, G., Eds.; Physica-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 233–260. [Google Scholar]
- Murphy, K.R. Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time? Hum. Perform. 1989, 2, 183–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javed, H.A.; Jaffari, A.A.; Rahim, M. Leadership styles and employees’ job satisfaction: A case from the private banking sector of Pakistan. J. Asian Bus. Strategy 2014, 4, 41. [Google Scholar]
- Campbell, J.P. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology; Dunnette, M.D., Hough, L.M., Eds.; Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 687–732. [Google Scholar]
- Koopmans, L.; Bernaards, C.M.; Hildebrandt, V.H.; de Vet, H.C.; van der Beek, A.J. Measuring individual work performance: Identifying and selecting indicators. Work 2014, 48, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Judge, T.A.; Thoresen, C.J.; Bono, J.E.; Patton, G.K. The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychol. Bull. 2001, 127, 376–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bin, A.S.; Shmailan, A. The relationship between job satisfaction, job performance and employee engagement: An explorative study. Issues Bus. Manag. Econ. 2015, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Riketta, M. The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2008, 93, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alessandri, G.; Borgogni, L.; Latham, G.P. A dynamic model of the longitudinal relationship between job satisfaction and supervisor-rated job performance. Appl. Psychol. 2017, 66, 207–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aziri, B. Job satisfaction: A literature review. Manag. Res. Pract. 2011, 3, 77–86. [Google Scholar]
- Eagly, A.H.; Chaiken, S. The Psychology of Attitudes; Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers: Fort Worth, TX, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Organ, D.W. Organizational citizenship behavior: Recent trends and developments. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2018, 80, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemakumara, M.G. The impact of job satisfaction on organizational citizenship behavior: A review of literature. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2020, 11, 49–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Organ, D.W. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome; Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com: Rowman & Littlefield Group: Lanham, MD, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Azmi, F.T.; Desai, K.; Jayakrishnan, K. Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB): A comprehensive literature review. Sumedha J. Manag. 2016, 5, 102–117. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, N.P.; Whiting, S.W.; Podsakoff, P.M.; Blume, B.D. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 2009, 94, 122–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Davila, M.C.; Finkelstein, M.A. Organizational citizenship behavior and well-being: Preliminary results. Int. J. Appl. Psychol. 2013, 3, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
- Glomb, T.M.; Bhave, D.P.; Miner, A.G.; Wall, M. Doing good, feeling good: Examining the role of organizational citizenship behaviors in changing mood. Pers. Psychol. 2011, 64, 191–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Werner, J.M. Dimensions that make a difference: Examining the impact of in-role and extra-role behaviors on supervisory ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 1994, 79, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, T.D.; Rush, M.C. The effects of organizational citizenship on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. J. Appl. Psychol. 1998, 83, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wayne, S.J.; Shore, L.M.; Bommer, W.H.; Tetrick, L.E. The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 87, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Law, K.S.; Hackett, R.D.; Wang, D.; Chen, Z.X. Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 2005, 48, 420–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mohammad, J.; Quoquab, F.; Mohamad, A.A. Job satisfaction and organisational citizenship behaviour: An empirical study at higher learning institutions. Asian Acad. Manag. J. 2011, 16, 159–165. [Google Scholar]
- Greenberg, J.; Scott, K.S. Why do workers bite the hands that feed them? Employee theft as a social exchange process. In Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews; Staw, B.M., Cummings, L.L., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; JAI Press: Stamford, CT, USA, 1996; Volume 18, pp. 111–156. [Google Scholar]
- Harrison, D.A.; Newman, D.A.; Roth, P.L. How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Acad. Manag. J. 2006, 49, 305–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kristian, B.; Ferijani, A. The effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on employee performance with OCB as the intervening variables. J. Manag. Bus. Environ. 2020, 2, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setiawan, D.P.; Gunawan, H. The effect of job satisfaction and organization commitment to job performance through organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) as meditation variable (Empiris study on pt. Bank Mandiri at Jakarta). Bus. Entrep. Rev. 2019, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fransen, E.; Plantenga, J.; Vlasblom, J.D. Why do women still earn less than men? Decomposing the Dutch gender pay gap, 1996–2006. Appl. Econ. 2012, 44, 4343–4354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eurostat. The Gender Pay-Gap Situation in the EU. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/gender-equality/equal-pay/gender-pay-gap-situation-eu_en (accessed on 20 June 2020).
- Mackey, J.D.; Roth, P.L.; Van Iddekinge, C.H.; McFarland, L.A. A meta-analysis of gender proportionality effects on job performance. Group Organ. Manag. 2019, 44, 578–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sousa-Poza, A.; Sousa-Poza, A.A. Gender differences in job satisfaction in Great Britain, 1991–2000: Permanent or transitory? Appl. Econ. Lett. 2003, 10, 691–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiser, L.C. Gender-job satisfaction differences across Europe: An indicator for labour market modernization. Int. J. Manpow. 2007, 28, 75–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, D.; Perrucci, C.C. Job satisfaction: Impact of gender, race, worker qualifications, and work context. Res. Sociol. Work 2010, 20, 39–58. [Google Scholar]
- Perugini, C.; Vladisavljević, M. Gender inequality and the gender-job satisfaction paradox in Europe. Labour Econ. 2019, 60, 129–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Clark, A.E. Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work? Labour Econ. 1997, 4, 341–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattingly, M.J.; Blanchi, S.M. Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The US experience. Soc. Forces 2003, 81, 999–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aryee, S.; Srinivas, E.S.; Tan, H.H. Rhythms of life: Antecedents and outcomes of work-family balance in employed parents. J. Appl. Psychol. 2005, 90, 132–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasir, R.; Fatimah, O.; Mohammadi, M.S.; Shahrazad, W.S.; Khairudin, R.; Halim, F.W. Demographic variables as moderators in the relationship between job satisfaction and task performance. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2011, 19, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
- Callaghan, C. Gender moderation of intrinsic research productivity antecedents in South African academia. Pers. Rev. 2017, 46, 572–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, P.S.; Bergeron, D.M.; Bolino, M.C. No obligation? How gender influences the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 2020, 105, 1338–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurtessis, J.N.; Eisenberger, R.; Ford, M.T.; Buffardi, L.C.; Stewart, K.A.; Adis, C.S. Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. J. Manag. 2017, 43, 1854–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nasir, R.; Mohammadi, M.S.; Wan Shahrazad, W.S.; Fatimah, O.; Khairudin, R.; Halim, F. Relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and task performance. Soc. Sci. 2011, 6, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, T.W.H.; Feldman, D.C. The relationships of age with job attitudes: A meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 2010, 63, 677–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobrow Riza, S.; Ganzach, Y.; Liu, Y. Time and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study of the differential roles of age and tenure. J. Manag. 2018, 44, 2558–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ng, T.W.H.; Feldman, D.C. The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 2008, 93, 392–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.K.; McDowell, J.; Vargas, P. How old I feel matters: Examining age-related differences in motives and organizational citizenship behavior. J. Park Recreat. Adm. 2015, 33, 20–39. [Google Scholar]
- Mitonga-Monga, J.; Flotman, A.; Cilliers, F.V.N. Organisational citizenship behaviour among railway employees in a developing country: Effects of age, education, and tenure. S. Afr. Bus. Rev. 2017, 21, 385–406. [Google Scholar]
- Alessandri, G.; Truxillo, D.M.; Tisak, J.; Fagnani, C.; Borgogni, L. Within-individual age-related trends, cycles, and event-driven changes in job performance: A career-span perspective. J. Bus. Psychol. 2019, 1, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Fabra, M.E.; Camisón, C. Direct and indirect effects of education on job satisfaction: A structural equation model for the Spanish case. Econ. Educ. Rev. 2009, 28, 600–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solomon, B.C.; Nikolaev, B.N.; Shepherd, D.A. Does educational attainment promote job satisfaction? The bittersweet trade-offs between job resources, demands, and stress. J. Appl. Psychol. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, T.W.H.; Feldman, D.C. How broadly does education contribute to job performance? Pers. Psychol. 2009, 62, 89–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thorsteinson, T.J. Job attitudes of part-time vs. full-time workers: A meta-analytic review. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2003, 76, 151–177. [Google Scholar]
- Ng, T.W.; Feldman, D.C. Long work hours: A social identity perspective on meta-analysis data. J. Organ. Behav. 2008, 29, 853–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, K.; Chelladurai, P. Comparison of part-time workers and full-time workers: Commitment and citizenship behaviors in Korean sport organizations. J. Sport Manag. 2003, 17, 394–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, T.W.; Feldman, D.C. Does longer job tenure help or hinder job performance? J. Vocat. Behav. 2013, 83, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brief, A.P.; Weiss, H.M. Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2002, 53, 279–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- LePine, J.A.; Erez, A.; Johnson, D.E. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 87, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fan, W.; Yan, Z. Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argentero, P.; Cortese, C.G.; Ferretti, M.S. An evaluation of organizational citizenship behavior: Psychometric characteristics of the Italian version of Podsakoff et al.’s scale. TPM Test. Psychom. Methodol. Appl. Psychol. 2008, 15, 61–75. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; Mackenzie, S.B.; Moorman, R.H.; Fetter, R. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Leadersh. Q. 1990, 1, 107–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koopmans, L.; Bernaards, C.M.; Hildebrandt, V.H.; Van Buuren, S.; Van der Beek, A.J.; de Vet, H.C. Improving the individual work performance questionnaire using rasch analysis. J. Appl. Meas. 2014, 15, 160–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koopmans, L.; Bernaards, C.M.; Hildebrandt, V.H.; van Buuren, S.; van der Beek, A.J.; de Vet, H.C. Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2013, 62, 6–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 2008, 40, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryu, E.; Cheong, J. Comparing indirect effects in difference groups in single-group and multi-group structural equation models. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 747. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, L.T.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Modeling 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franke, G.H. “The whole is more than the sum of its parts”: The effects of grouping and randomizing items on the reliability and validity of questionnaires. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 1997, 13, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schell, K.L.; Oswald, F.L. Item grouping and item randomization in personality measurement. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2013, 55, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etzel, J.M.; Holland, J.; Nagy, G. The internal and external validity of the latent vocational interest circumplex: Structure, relationships with self-concepts, and robustness against item-order effects. J. Vocat. Behav. 2021, 124, 103520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpenter, N.C.; Berry, C.M.; Houston, L. A meta-analytic comparison of self-reported and other-reported organizational citizenship behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 2014, 35, 547–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demerouti, E.; Xanthopoulou, D.; Tsaousis, I.; Bakker, A.B. Disentangling task and contextual performance: A multitrait-multimethod approach. J. Pers. Psychol. 2014, 13, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bethlehem, J. Selection bias in web surveys. Int. Stat. Rev. 2010, 78, 161–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castellacci, F.; Viñas-Bardolet, C. Internet use and job satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 90, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brady, G.M.; Truxillo, D.M.; Cadiz, D.M.; Rineer, J.R.; Caughlin, D.E.; Bodner, T. Opening the black box: Examining the nomological network of work ability and its role in organizational research. J. Appl. Psychol. 2020, 105, 637–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barattucci, M.; Teresi, M.; Pietroni, D.; Iacobucci, S.; Lo Presti, A.; Pagliaro, S. Ethical climate(s), distributed leadership, and work outcomes: The mediating role of organizational identification. Front. Psychol. 2021, 11, 3987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stankevičiūtė, Ž.; Staniškienė, E.; Ramanauskaitė, J. The impact of job insecurity on organisational citizenship behaviour and task performance: Evidence from robotised furniture sector companies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaakobi, E.; Weisberg, J. Organizational citizenship behavior predicts quality, creativity, and efficiency performance: The roles of occupational and collective efficacies. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Memon, M.A.; Sallaeh, R.; Baharom, M.N.R.; Md Nordin, S.; Ting, H. The relationship between training satisfaction, organisational citizenship behaviour, and turnover intention. J. Organ. Eff. People Perform. 2017, 4, 267–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ocampo, L.; Acedillo, V.; Bacunador, A.M.; Balo, C.C.; Lagdameo, Y.J.; Tupa, N.S. A historical review of the development of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and its implications for the twenty-first century. Pers. Rev. 2018, 47, 821–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foote, D.A.; Li-Ping, T. Job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB): Does team commitment make a difference in self-directed teams? Manag. Decis. 2008, 46, 933–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rotundo, M.; Sackett, P.R. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of performance: A policycapturing approach. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 87, 66–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Characteristic | |
---|---|
Age, mean (SD) | 36.30 (12.35) |
Gender, n (%) | |
Men | 235 (45.37) |
Women | 283 (54.63) |
Education, n (%) | |
Low-to-medium | 279 (53.86) |
High | 239 (46.14) |
Work status, n (%) | |
Full-time | 389 (75.10) |
Part-time | 129 (24.90) |
Organizational tenure (months), mean (SD) | 101.19 (118.45) |
Gender | ANOVA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Men (n = 235) | Women (n = 283) | F (1,516) | p | Cohen’s d | |
JS, mean (SD) | 33.91 (8.45) | 35.94 (8.45) | 7.35 | <0.001 | 0.24 |
OCB, mean (SD) | 84.45 (11.75) | 89.22 (10.33) | 24.21 | <0.001 | 0.43 |
TP, mean (SD) | 19.66 (3.17) | 19.26 (3.00) | 2.16 | 0.14 | 0.13 |
JS | OCB | TP | |
---|---|---|---|
Age | 0.07 | 0.12 * | 0.14 * |
Education | 0.01 | −0.02 | −0.08 |
Work status | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
Organizational tenure | 0.05 | 0.11 * | 0.18 ** |
Effect | Males | Females | Wald Statistic | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Job satisfaction → Task performance | 0.14 (0.06) | 0.14 (0.06) | 0.003 | 0.96 |
Job satisfaction → Organizational citizenship behavior | 0.21 (0.06) | 0.27 (0.06) | 0.12 | 0.73 |
Organizational citizenship behavior → Task performance | 0.29 (0.06) | 0.36 (0.05) | 3.22 | 0.07 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Casu, G.; Mariani, M.G.; Chiesa, R.; Guglielmi, D.; Gremigni, P. The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Gender between Job Satisfaction and Task Performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189499
Casu G, Mariani MG, Chiesa R, Guglielmi D, Gremigni P. The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Gender between Job Satisfaction and Task Performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(18):9499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189499
Chicago/Turabian StyleCasu, Giulia, Marco Giovanni Mariani, Rita Chiesa, Dina Guglielmi, and Paola Gremigni. 2021. "The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Gender between Job Satisfaction and Task Performance" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 18: 9499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189499